Schizophrenia Research最新文献

Background

Antipsychotic polypharmacy (APP) is frequently prescribed for schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. Despite the inconsistent findings on efficacy, APP may be beneficial for subgroups of psychotic patients. This meta-analysis of individual patient data investigated moderators of efficacy and tolerability of APP in adult patients with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders.

Design

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Randomized Trials until September 1, 2022, for randomized controlled trials comparing APP with antipsychotic monotherapy. We estimated the effects with a one-stage approach for patient-level moderators and a two-stage approach for study-level moderators, using (generalized) linear mixed-effects models. Primary outcome was treatment response, defined as a reduction of 25 % or more in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) score. Secondary outcomes were study discontinuation, and changes from baseline on the PANSS total score, its positive and negative symptom subscale scores, the Clinical Global Impressions Scale (CGI), and adverse effects.

Results

We obtained individual patient data from 10 studies (602 patients; 31 % of all possible patients) and included 599 patients in our analysis. A higher baseline PANSS total score increased the chance of a response to APP (OR = 1.41, 95 % CI 1.02; 1.94, p = 0.037 per 10-point increase in baseline PANSS total), mainly driven by baseline positive symptoms. The same applied to changes on the PANSS positive symptom subscale and the CGI severity scale. Extrapyramidal side effects increased significantly where first and second-generation antipsychotics were co-prescribed. Study discontinuation was comparable between both treatment arms.

Conclusions

APP was effective in severely psychotic patients with high baseline PANSS total scores and predominantly positive symptoms. This effect must be weighed against potential adverse effects.

Multiomics approaches have significantly aided the identification of molecular signatures in complex neuropsychiatric disorders. Lipidomics, one of the newest additions in the -omics family, sheds light on lipid profiles and is an emerging methodological tool to study schizophrenia pathobiology, as lipid dysregulation has been repeatedly observed in schizophrenia.

In this review, we performed a detailed literature search for lipidomics studies in schizophrenia. Following elaborate inclusion/exclusion criteria, we focused on human studies in schizophrenia and schizophrenia-related diagnoses in brain and blood specimens, including serum plasma, platelets and red blood cells. Eighteen studies fulfilled our inclusion criteria, of which five were conducted in the brain, 12 in peripheral material and one in both. Here, we first provide background on lipidomics and the main lipid categories addressed, review in detail the included literature and look for common lipidomics patterns in brain and the periphery that emerge from these studies. Furthermore, we highlight current limitations in schizophrenia lipidomics research and underline the need for following up on lipidomics results with complementary molecular approaches.

Introduction

Many articles suggest that clozapine was strongly associated with a higher incidence of new-onset diabetes mellitus, and the issue has remained unsettled. Many articles have compared clozapine with FGAs, but few have compared clozapine with SGAs. We aimed to compare the risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus in adults with schizophrenia treated with clozapine and other SGAs.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive search of databases from their inception up until August 26, 2023. The specific databases include PubMed, Embase and others. We included non-randomized controlled trials involving the use of SGAs such as clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, amisulpride, and zotepine, with a focus on new-onset diabetes mellitus as an outcome. We utilized odds ratio with 95 % credible intervals (95 % CI) as our effect size measures. The study protocol is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42024511280.

Results

We included 7 studies with sufficient data to include in the meta-analysis. A total of eight studies with 641,48 participants met the eligibility criteria. The OR of the incidence rates of new-onset diabetes between clozapine and olanzapine was 0.95 (95 % CI:[0.82–1.09]), between clozapine and risperidone was 1.25 (95 % CI: [1.09–1.44]), between clozapine and quetiapine was 1.44 (95 % CI: [0.92–2.25]).

Conclusion

In patients with schizophrenia, clozapine has been found to have a higher rate of new-onset diabetes mellitus compared to risperidone. However, there was no significant difference in incidence rate between clozapine versus olanzapine and quetiapine. These findings can assist clinicians in balancing the risks and benefits of those drugs.

Introduction

Catatonia, documented since the 19th century, remains a significant challenge in terms of recognition and treatment. Over the last two decades, ketamine has brought new perspectives to psychiatry, sparking widespread interest. Concurrently, catatonia has attracted heightened scientific attention. Preliminary evidence suggests the therapeutic potential of ketamine for catatonia.

Methods

We systematically searched Medline/PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Lilacs, and Cochrane Library databases, as well as Google Scholar, for studies with ketamine or its enantiomers as intervention for catatonia, with no restrictions to underlying diagnosis, date, language, or study design.

Results

Twenty articles were included, encompassing a total of 25 catatonic patients receiving ketamine or esketamine. Predominantly female (61.9 %), with a mean age of 44.4 years, patients mostly exhibited manifestations compatible with the retarded subtype of catatonia. Mood disorders were the most prevalent underlying diagnoses. Ketamine was primarily administered intravenously over a 40-minute period and in multiple-dosing schemes. Mean response and remission rates of catatonic manifestations for the whole sample were 80 % and 44 %, respectively, with no reports of worsening catatonic features or psychotic symptoms. Only one patient discontinued treatment due to intolerable dissociative effects.

Conclusion

Challenging the conventional contraindication of ketamine in psychotic disorders, current evidence highlights its potential efficacy, particularly in treating catatonia. Pending further research, we advocate reevaluating this contraindication, as it may offer a promising therapeutic option, especially for challenging cases. Preliminary evidence suggests potentially greater benefits for catatonic patients with underlying mood disorders compared to primary psychotic disorders.