Laura M König, Cynthia C Forbes, Heide Busse, Ann DeSmet, Dorothy Szinay, Jin Wan, Zhirui Guo, Eline S Smit
Mobile health interventions are promising behavior change tools, but they might benefit deprived populations less due to disparities in intervention uptake, engagement, and effectiveness. Evidence so far mainly stems from clinical trials, which may suffer from selection bias. This systematic review investigated differences in uptake of, engagement with, and effectiveness of exclusively mobile interventions for diet, physical activity, and sedentary behavior in adults and real-life contexts. Five databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Web of Science) were searched from inception to November 2023. Records were independently screened by two authors. Observational studies including adults were considered if they reported on uptake, engagement, or effectiveness of an exclusively mobile intervention and examined outcomes by at least one inequality indicator included in the PROGRESS-Plus framework. Of the 9707 identified records, 87 publications reporting on 88 studies were included. Most studies reported on intervention uptake and examined multiple inequality indicators. Younger age and higher socioeconomic position were mostly associated with increased uptake, although these differences did not translate to engagement or effectiveness. Results for other inequality indicators were mixed, and some (e.g., migration and sexual orientation) were rarely studied. Evidence regarding social inequality remains mixed, although some barriers to uptake, such as access to the required technology and digital literacy, exist. Research urgently needs to address potential inequalities beyond age, gender/sex, and socioeconomic position to ensure that mobile interventions do not widen existing health inequalities.
移动卫生干预措施是有希望改变行为的工具,但由于干预措施的接受、参与和有效性方面的差异,它们对贫困人口的益处可能较少。目前的证据主要来自临床试验,可能存在选择偏差。本系统综述调查了在成人和现实生活环境中,对饮食、身体活动和久坐行为进行专门移动干预的吸收、参与和有效性的差异。五个数据库(CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, PubMed和Web of Science)从成立到2023年11月进行了检索。记录由两位作者独立筛选。包括成人在内的观察性研究,如果他们报告了单独移动干预的接受、参与或有效性,并通过PROGRESS-Plus框架中至少一个不平等指标检查了结果,则被考虑。在确定的9707份记录中,纳入了87份出版物,报告了88项研究。大多数研究报告了干预措施的接受情况,并检查了多个不平等指标。年龄越小,社会经济地位越高,接受程度越高,尽管这些差异并不能转化为参与度或有效性。其他不平等指标的结果好坏参半,有些指标(例如移徙和性取向)很少得到研究。有关社会不平等的证据仍然好坏参半,尽管存在一些障碍,例如获得所需的技术和数字素养。研究迫切需要解决年龄、性别/性别和社会经济地位之外的潜在不平等问题,以确保流动干预措施不会扩大现有的卫生不平等。
{"title":"Inequalities in Exclusively Mobile Interventions Targeting Weight-Related Behaviors: Systematic Review of Observational Studies.","authors":"Laura M König, Cynthia C Forbes, Heide Busse, Ann DeSmet, Dorothy Szinay, Jin Wan, Zhirui Guo, Eline S Smit","doi":"10.1111/obr.70057","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.70057","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mobile health interventions are promising behavior change tools, but they might benefit deprived populations less due to disparities in intervention uptake, engagement, and effectiveness. Evidence so far mainly stems from clinical trials, which may suffer from selection bias. This systematic review investigated differences in uptake of, engagement with, and effectiveness of exclusively mobile interventions for diet, physical activity, and sedentary behavior in adults and real-life contexts. Five databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Web of Science) were searched from inception to November 2023. Records were independently screened by two authors. Observational studies including adults were considered if they reported on uptake, engagement, or effectiveness of an exclusively mobile intervention and examined outcomes by at least one inequality indicator included in the PROGRESS-Plus framework. Of the 9707 identified records, 87 publications reporting on 88 studies were included. Most studies reported on intervention uptake and examined multiple inequality indicators. Younger age and higher socioeconomic position were mostly associated with increased uptake, although these differences did not translate to engagement or effectiveness. Results for other inequality indicators were mixed, and some (e.g., migration and sexual orientation) were rarely studied. Evidence regarding social inequality remains mixed, although some barriers to uptake, such as access to the required technology and digital literacy, exist. Research urgently needs to address potential inequalities beyond age, gender/sex, and socioeconomic position to ensure that mobile interventions do not widen existing health inequalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e70057"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145686693","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rubén Fernández-Rodríguez, Balma Boira-Nacher, María Eugenia Visier-Alfonso, Ana Torres-Costoso, Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno, Jonatan R Ruiz
Background: Time-restricted eating (TRE) limits food intake to a specific daily window and has gained popularity, showing modest benefits for cardiometabolic health. However, perspectives and experiences from adults and healthcare professionals about TRE remain underexplored but are vital for successful implementation in research and clinical practice.
Objective: To synthesize qualitative evidence on participants' and healthcare professionals' experiences and perceptions of TRE, with a gender-based analytical lens.
Methods: A systematic search was conducted on four databases from their inception until March 2025, searching for studies reporting qualitative analysis of the perceptions and experiences associated with TRE in adults and healthcare professionals. Methodological quality was appraised using the CASP checklist. Thematic synthesis was applied to extract overarching themes, with additional gender-based analysis. Confidence in the findings was assessed using the GRADE-CERQual approach.
Results: Thirteen articles including 225 participants (aged between 18 and 74 years), of which 22 were health professionals and dietitians were included. Three themes were found: motivation; barriers and facilitators, including three subthemes in each: biological, psychological and socio-cultural. Women's perspectives were commonly related to disappointment with previous diet and body dissatisfaction as motivators, food craving and emotional eating behaviors as barriers, and improvement of healthy eating habits and hunger control as facilitators. Otherwise, men were more motivated by managing appetite with shorter eating windows and found routine and day planning as key facilitators.
Conclusion: Perceptions and experiences of TRE are shaped by diverse motivators and challenges. Tailored, gender-sensitive approaches to support TRE integration in clinical practice are needed. PROSPERO Registry Number: CRD420250649633.
{"title":"Understanding Participants' and Health Professionals' Perceptions and Experiences of Time-Restricted Eating: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Evidence.","authors":"Rubén Fernández-Rodríguez, Balma Boira-Nacher, María Eugenia Visier-Alfonso, Ana Torres-Costoso, Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno, Jonatan R Ruiz","doi":"10.1111/obr.70061","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.70061","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Time-restricted eating (TRE) limits food intake to a specific daily window and has gained popularity, showing modest benefits for cardiometabolic health. However, perspectives and experiences from adults and healthcare professionals about TRE remain underexplored but are vital for successful implementation in research and clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To synthesize qualitative evidence on participants' and healthcare professionals' experiences and perceptions of TRE, with a gender-based analytical lens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted on four databases from their inception until March 2025, searching for studies reporting qualitative analysis of the perceptions and experiences associated with TRE in adults and healthcare professionals. Methodological quality was appraised using the CASP checklist. Thematic synthesis was applied to extract overarching themes, with additional gender-based analysis. Confidence in the findings was assessed using the GRADE-CERQual approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen articles including 225 participants (aged between 18 and 74 years), of which 22 were health professionals and dietitians were included. Three themes were found: motivation; barriers and facilitators, including three subthemes in each: biological, psychological and socio-cultural. Women's perspectives were commonly related to disappointment with previous diet and body dissatisfaction as motivators, food craving and emotional eating behaviors as barriers, and improvement of healthy eating habits and hunger control as facilitators. Otherwise, men were more motivated by managing appetite with shorter eating windows and found routine and day planning as key facilitators.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Perceptions and experiences of TRE are shaped by diverse motivators and challenges. Tailored, gender-sensitive approaches to support TRE integration in clinical practice are needed. PROSPERO Registry Number: CRD420250649633.</p>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e70061"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145675974","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sophia M. Blaauwendraad, Arwen S. J. Kamphuis, Francisco Javier Ruiz-Ojeda, Marco Brandimonte-Hernández, Eduard Flores-Ventura, Marieke Abrahamse-Berkeveld, Maria Carmen Collado, Janna A. van Diepen, Patricia Iozzo, Karen Knipping, Carolien A. van Loo-Bouwman, Ángel Gil, Romy Gaillard