Sophia M Blaauwendraad, Arwen S J Kamphuis, Francisco Javier Ruiz-Ojeda, Marco Brandimonte-Hernández, Eduard Flores-Ventura, Marieke Abrahamse-Berkeveld, Maria Carmen Collado, Janna A van Diepen, Patricia Iozzo, Karen Knipping, Carolien A van Loo-Bouwman, Ángel Gil, Romy Gaillard
Background: Early-life exposures might negatively affect fetal and infant development, predisposing children to obesity. This study aimed to systematically identify and evaluate risk factors for childhood obesity in preconception, pregnancy, and infancy, and assess their potential for future prediction and prevention strategies.
Methods: This systematic review (PROSPERO, CRD42022355152) included longitudinal studies from selected electronic databases published between inception and August 17th, 2022, identifying maternal, paternal, or infant risk factors from preconception until infancy for childhood obesity between 2 and 18 years. Screening and data extraction were conducted using standardized forms. We assessed risk factor quality on modifiability and predictive power using a piloted criteria template from ILSI-Europe-Marker-Validation-Initiative.
Findings: We identified 172 publications from observational and five publications from intervention studies involving n = 1,879,971 children from 37, predominantly high-income, countries. Average reported childhood obesity prevalence was 11.1%. Pregnancy and infancy risk factors were mostly studied. We identified 59 potential risk factors; 23 were consistently associated. Strongest risk factors were: higher maternal prepregnancy weight (n = 28/31 publications with positive associations), higher gestational weight gain (n = 18/21), maternal smoking during pregnancy (n = 23/29), higher birth weight (n = 20/28), large-size-for-gestational-age-at-birth (n = 17/18), no breastfeeding (n = 20/31), and higher infant weight gain (n = 12/12). Level of evidence was generally moderate due to unreliable exposure measurement, short follow-up/loss to follow-up, and risk of confounding.
Interpretation: We identified seven early-life risk factors, which were strongly associated with childhood obesity, and can contribute to future prediction and prevention strategies. These findings support the implementation of prevention strategies targeting these risk factors from a clinical and population perspective, where possible integrated with implementation studies.
{"title":"Risk Factors in the First 1000 Days of Life Associated With Childhood Obesity: A Systematic Review and Risk Factor Quality Assessment.","authors":"Sophia M Blaauwendraad, Arwen S J Kamphuis, Francisco Javier Ruiz-Ojeda, Marco Brandimonte-Hernández, Eduard Flores-Ventura, Marieke Abrahamse-Berkeveld, Maria Carmen Collado, Janna A van Diepen, Patricia Iozzo, Karen Knipping, Carolien A van Loo-Bouwman, Ángel Gil, Romy Gaillard","doi":"10.1111/obr.70025","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.70025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early-life exposures might negatively affect fetal and infant development, predisposing children to obesity. This study aimed to systematically identify and evaluate risk factors for childhood obesity in preconception, pregnancy, and infancy, and assess their potential for future prediction and prevention strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review (PROSPERO, CRD42022355152) included longitudinal studies from selected electronic databases published between inception and August 17th, 2022, identifying maternal, paternal, or infant risk factors from preconception until infancy for childhood obesity between 2 and 18 years. Screening and data extraction were conducted using standardized forms. We assessed risk factor quality on modifiability and predictive power using a piloted criteria template from ILSI-Europe-Marker-Validation-Initiative.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We identified 172 publications from observational and five publications from intervention studies involving n = 1,879,971 children from 37, predominantly high-income, countries. Average reported childhood obesity prevalence was 11.1%. Pregnancy and infancy risk factors were mostly studied. We identified 59 potential risk factors; 23 were consistently associated. Strongest risk factors were: higher maternal prepregnancy weight (n = 28/31 publications with positive associations), higher gestational weight gain (n = 18/21), maternal smoking during pregnancy (n = 23/29), higher birth weight (n = 20/28), large-size-for-gestational-age-at-birth (n = 17/18), no breastfeeding (n = 20/31), and higher infant weight gain (n = 12/12). Level of evidence was generally moderate due to unreliable exposure measurement, short follow-up/loss to follow-up, and risk of confounding.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>We identified seven early-life risk factors, which were strongly associated with childhood obesity, and can contribute to future prediction and prevention strategies. These findings support the implementation of prevention strategies targeting these risk factors from a clinical and population perspective, where possible integrated with implementation studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e70025"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145555844","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Natasha Nalucha Mwala, Jos W Borkent, Carliene van Dronkelaar, Jeanne J F A In 't Hulst, Barbara S van der Meij, Maarten R Soeters, Marian A E de van der Schueren
Rationale: The global rise in obesity presents a major public health challenge, commonly associated with an increased risk of noncommunicable diseases. Paradoxically, individuals with obesity, particularly older adults and those with comorbidities, are also at risk of malnutrition. This coexistence, driven by inadequate nutritional intake, chronic inflammation, and immune dysfunction, highlights the need to understand these overlapping health risks. Obesity complicates the identification and management of malnutrition. This review examines current screening and diagnostic methods for malnutrition in individuals with obesity.
Methods: A systematic scoping review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. Literature was searched using a comprehensive strategy across the EBSCOhost database.
Results: From 2097 search results, 41 studies with 420,498 participants met the inclusion criteria. Three main methods for assessing malnutrition risk/nutritional status emerged: blood markers, malnutrition screening tools, and physical/etiologic assessments. The diagnostic criteria described were typically based on healthy weight reference values, lacking obesity-specific cutoff values. Only two studies introduced tools tailored to individuals with obesity: the Nutrition Health Outcomes Questionnaire and the Just a Nutritional Screening Tool.
Conclusion: Current malnutrition screening and diagnostic methods lack reliability, validity, and appropriate reference values for individuals with obesity. This limits their effectiveness in accurately identifying malnutrition risk in this population. Adjusting cutoff values for key indicators such as weight loss and muscle mass is vital to improve the accuracy of malnutrition diagnosis and ensure appropriate clinical management for individuals with obesity.
{"title":"Screening and Diagnosis of Malnutrition in Individuals With Obesity: A Scoping Review of Current Methods.","authors":"Natasha Nalucha Mwala, Jos W Borkent, Carliene van Dronkelaar, Jeanne J F A In 't Hulst, Barbara S van der Meij, Maarten R Soeters, Marian A E de van der Schueren","doi":"10.1111/obr.70033","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.70033","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>The global rise in obesity presents a major public health challenge, commonly associated with an increased risk of noncommunicable diseases. Paradoxically, individuals with obesity, particularly older adults and those with comorbidities, are also at risk of malnutrition. This coexistence, driven by inadequate nutritional intake, chronic inflammation, and immune dysfunction, highlights the need to understand these overlapping health risks. Obesity complicates the identification and management of malnutrition. This review examines current screening and diagnostic methods for malnutrition in individuals with obesity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic scoping review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. Literature was searched using a comprehensive strategy across the EBSCOhost database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2097 search results, 41 studies with 420,498 participants met the inclusion criteria. Three main methods for assessing malnutrition risk/nutritional status emerged: blood markers, malnutrition screening tools, and physical/etiologic assessments. The diagnostic criteria described were typically based on healthy weight reference values, lacking obesity-specific cutoff values. Only two studies introduced tools tailored to individuals with obesity: the Nutrition Health Outcomes Questionnaire and the Just a Nutritional Screening Tool.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current malnutrition screening and diagnostic methods lack reliability, validity, and appropriate reference values for individuals with obesity. This limits their effectiveness in accurately identifying malnutrition risk in this population. Adjusting cutoff values for key indicators such as weight loss and muscle mass is vital to improve the accuracy of malnutrition diagnosis and ensure appropriate clinical management for individuals with obesity.</p>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e70033"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145555816","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Very few studies exist examining the effects of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) in patients with obesity, which is notable given that mTBI represents ~80% of all recorded TBIs. Given that approximately 40% of US adults have an obese body mass index (with predictions that this proportion will continue to increase), it would be prudent to focus efforts on targeted treatments for this growing subpopulation of patients with TBI. Authors have postulated that higher preinjury inflammation, as observed in the patient with obesity, could lead to greater spikes in acute inflammation following traumatic brain injury and higher chances of prolonged inflammation. Evidence to support this hypothesis has emerged recently, but this body of research has limitations such as evaluating TBI outcomes at variable timepoints along with an underappreciation of the heterogeneity of TBI outcomes. Our goal was to identify gaps where future work is needed by synthesizing the state-of-the-science across these clinical variabilities. In this scoping review, we summarize the available literature across different TBI severities and time from injury before providing a brief summary of basic science evidence on the topic and opportunities for future research.
{"title":"Clinical Outcomes in the Patient With Traumatic Brain Injury and Comorbid Obesity: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Shawn R Eagle, Erin Kershaw","doi":"10.1111/obr.70040","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.70040","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Very few studies exist examining the effects of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) in patients with obesity, which is notable given that mTBI represents ~80% of all recorded TBIs. Given that approximately 40% of US adults have an obese body mass index (with predictions that this proportion will continue to increase), it would be prudent to focus efforts on targeted treatments for this growing subpopulation of patients with TBI. Authors have postulated that higher preinjury inflammation, as observed in the patient with obesity, could lead to greater spikes in acute inflammation following traumatic brain injury and higher chances of prolonged inflammation. Evidence to support this hypothesis has emerged recently, but this body of research has limitations such as evaluating TBI outcomes at variable timepoints along with an underappreciation of the heterogeneity of TBI outcomes. Our goal was to identify gaps where future work is needed by synthesizing the state-of-the-science across these clinical variabilities. In this scoping review, we summarize the available literature across different TBI severities and time from injury before providing a brief summary of basic science evidence on the topic and opportunities for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e70040"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145547405","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Amira Hassan, Hayley Breare, Megan E Rollo, Barbara A Mullan, Christina M Pollard, Deborah A Kerr, Satvinder S Dhaliwal, Andrea Begley
Introduction: Digital health interventions are effective for weight management and improving dietary intake, but studies in culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) and Indigenous populations are limited. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness of digital health interventions on body weight and dietary intake outcomes in CALD and Indigenous populations.
Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were searched on December 28, 2022 (PROSPERO: CRD42023394058). Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in high-income English-speaking countries with free-living adults ≥ 18 years. Trials had to report both weight and dietary outcomes, with ≥ 50% participants from CALD/Indigenous backgrounds or outcomes reported by race/ethnicity. Two reviewers independently screened records. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. Results were synthesized descriptively and presented in graphs and tables.
Results: From the 1984 records identified, nine RCTs were included, which involved a total of 2716 participants. Eight trials were conducted in the United States, and only one trial included Indigenous participants. Significant body weight changes occurred in three trials. Significant diet quality changes occurred in three trials. Most trials had high retention rates (≥ 80%) but low intervention adherence (< 50%). Risk of bias was low for most trials.
Conclusion: Limited evidence supports the effectiveness of digital health interventions for improving body weight and dietary intake outcomes in CALD and Indigenous populations. The predominance of US-based trials, female-dominated samples, and hybrid intervention designs limits generalizability. Future research should prioritize inclusive practices and standalone digital designs to establish effectiveness in these populations.
数字健康干预措施对体重管理和改善饮食摄入是有效的,但对文化和语言多样性(CALD)和土著人口的研究有限。本系统综述的目的是评估数字健康干预对CALD和土著人口体重和饮食摄入结果的有效性。方法:于2022年12月28日检索MEDLINE、Embase、Scopus和Cochrane数据库(PROSPERO: CRD42023394058)。纳入标准是在高收入英语国家进行的随机对照试验(rct),受试者为≥18岁的自由生活成年人。试验必须报告体重和饮食结果,≥50%的受试者来自CALD/土着背景或按种族/民族报告的结果。两名审稿人独立筛选记录。使用Cochrane RoB 2工具评估偏倚风险。对结果进行描述性综合,并以图形和表格的形式呈现。结果:从确定的1984项记录中,纳入9项随机对照试验,共涉及2716名受试者。在美国进行了八项试验,其中只有一项试验包括土著参与者。在三个试验中出现了显著的体重变化。在三个试验中出现了显著的饮食质量变化。大多数试验的保留率高(≥80%),但干预依从性低(结论:有限的证据支持数字健康干预对改善CALD和土著人口体重和饮食摄入结果的有效性)。美国试验、女性为主的样本和混合干预设计的优势限制了通用性。未来的研究应优先考虑包容性实践和独立的数字设计,以在这些人群中建立有效性。
{"title":"Effectiveness of Digital Health Interventions on Body Weight and Dietary Intake Outcomes Among Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) and Indigenous Populations: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Amira Hassan, Hayley Breare, Megan E Rollo, Barbara A Mullan, Christina M Pollard, Deborah A Kerr, Satvinder S Dhaliwal, Andrea Begley","doi":"10.1111/obr.70035","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.70035","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Digital health interventions are effective for weight management and improving dietary intake, but studies in culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) and Indigenous populations are limited. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness of digital health interventions on body weight and dietary intake outcomes in CALD and Indigenous populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were searched on December 28, 2022 (PROSPERO: CRD42023394058). Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in high-income English-speaking countries with free-living adults ≥ 18 years. Trials had to report both weight and dietary outcomes, with ≥ 50% participants from CALD/Indigenous backgrounds or outcomes reported by race/ethnicity. Two reviewers independently screened records. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. Results were synthesized descriptively and presented in graphs and tables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the 1984 records identified, nine RCTs were included, which involved a total of 2716 participants. Eight trials were conducted in the United States, and only one trial included Indigenous participants. Significant body weight changes occurred in three trials. Significant diet quality changes occurred in three trials. Most trials had high retention rates (≥ 80%) but low intervention adherence (< 50%). Risk of bias was low for most trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Limited evidence supports the effectiveness of digital health interventions for improving body weight and dietary intake outcomes in CALD and Indigenous populations. The predominance of US-based trials, female-dominated samples, and hybrid intervention designs limits generalizability. Future research should prioritize inclusive practices and standalone digital designs to establish effectiveness in these populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e70035"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145436698","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Correction to \"Clinical Significance and Therapeutic Approach Concerning Various Abdominal Adipose Tissue Irregularities in End-Stage Liver Disease\".","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/obr.70034","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.70034","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e20001"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145399370","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}