Lee C Mercer, Mirna Al-Masri, Diana Rocha, Laura M König, Max Western
Digital behavioral change interventions (DBCIs) for weight-related behaviors may be less effective in disadvantaged populations, potentially widening health inequalities despite increased access. Limited research has explored the psychosocial mechanisms that may contribute to this divide. Following JBI guidelines for conducting scoping reviews, we conducted an electronic search on Embase, PubMed, APA PsycInfo, Web of Science, and SCOPUS on March 8, 2023, including studies published since 1990. The mechanisms of action ontology was used for deductive coding of the mechanisms discussed. The protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/ctua5). After initial screening of 17,503 papers, 21 studies met inclusion criteria, including RCTs, pre-post studies, systematic reviews, qualitative studies, cross-sectional, pilot, and feasibility studies. A second screen of 7840 articles in June 2025 identified three further studies that met the inclusion criteria. Socioeconomic inequalities and ethnicity were the predominant focus. Environment, motivation, and social influences were frequently cited mechanisms. However, mechanisms are inconsistently conceptualized and measured, highlighting a gap in explanatory research on the digital health divide.
针对体重相关行为的数字行为改变干预措施(dbci)在弱势群体中可能效果较差,尽管增加了获取途径,但可能扩大健康不平等。有限的研究探索了可能导致这种差异的社会心理机制。根据JBI的范围审查指南,我们于2023年3月8日在Embase、PubMed、APA PsycInfo、Web of Science和SCOPUS上进行了电子检索,包括1990年以来发表的研究。采用动作本体的机制对所讨论的机制进行演绎编码。该方案已在开放科学框架(https://osf.io/ctua5)上注册。在对17503篇论文进行初步筛选后,21项研究符合纳入标准,包括随机对照试验、前后研究、系统评价、定性研究、横断面研究、试点研究和可行性研究。2025年6月对7840篇文章进行了第二次筛选,确定了另外三项符合纳入标准的研究。社会经济不平等和种族问题是主要焦点。环境、动机和社会影响是经常被提及的机制。然而,机制的概念化和测量不一致,突出了数字健康鸿沟解释性研究的差距。
{"title":"A Scoping Review of the Mechanisms Influencing Socioeconomic Disparities in Outcomes of Digital Interventions for Weight-Related Behaviors.","authors":"Lee C Mercer, Mirna Al-Masri, Diana Rocha, Laura M König, Max Western","doi":"10.1111/obr.70121","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.70121","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Digital behavioral change interventions (DBCIs) for weight-related behaviors may be less effective in disadvantaged populations, potentially widening health inequalities despite increased access. Limited research has explored the psychosocial mechanisms that may contribute to this divide. Following JBI guidelines for conducting scoping reviews, we conducted an electronic search on Embase, PubMed, APA PsycInfo, Web of Science, and SCOPUS on March 8, 2023, including studies published since 1990. The mechanisms of action ontology was used for deductive coding of the mechanisms discussed. The protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/ctua5). After initial screening of 17,503 papers, 21 studies met inclusion criteria, including RCTs, pre-post studies, systematic reviews, qualitative studies, cross-sectional, pilot, and feasibility studies. A second screen of 7840 articles in June 2025 identified three further studies that met the inclusion criteria. Socioeconomic inequalities and ethnicity were the predominant focus. Environment, motivation, and social influences were frequently cited mechanisms. However, mechanisms are inconsistently conceptualized and measured, highlighting a gap in explanatory research on the digital health divide.</p>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e70121"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147429474","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Henrietta E Graham, Claire D Madigan, Kajal Gokal, Jessica F Large, James Sanders, Chris J McLeod, Natalie Pearson, Amanda J Daley
Introduction: Reducing childhood overweight and obesity prevalence is a global public health priority. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of behavioral weight management interventions delivered or referred to by health care providers in primary care settings.
Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of behavioral interventions published up to 05/01/2026, involving participants < 18 years with overweight or obesity, were identified through Cochrane, MEDLINE, PubMed, and PsychINFO. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Meta-analyses calculated pooled mean differences in zBMI and BMI using random effects models. The primary outcome was zBMI change at 12 months; secondary outcomes included zBMI changes at program end, last follow-up, and BMI at 12 months.
Results: Fifty-nine RCTs (n = 10,454) were included; 23 trials (n = 3241) contributed to the primary outcome. At 12 months, the pooled mean difference in zBMI was -0.08 (95% CI -0.13 to -0.03, p < 0.01), favoring intervention groups. At program end (n = 30), the mean difference was -0.15 (95% CI -0.22 to -0.08), and at last follow-up (n = 37), -0.08 (95% CI -0.15 to -0.02). BMI at 12 months showed a mean difference of -0.37 (95% CI -0.72 to -0.01). Interventions referred to community settings achieved greater zBMI reductions (-0.14 [95% CI -0.2 to -0.08]) than those delivered within primary care (0.04 [95% CI -0.10 to 0.18]).
Conclusions: Behavioral weight management interventions for children delivered or referred to by health care professionals in primary care led to modest reductions in zBMI. Referrals to community-based interventions (e.g., HENRY) may yield greater improvements.
前言:减少儿童超重和肥胖患病率是全球公共卫生的优先事项。本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了初级保健机构卫生保健提供者提供或提及的行为体重管理干预措施的有效性。方法:纳入截至2026年1月5日已发表的行为干预随机对照试验(rct)。结果:纳入59项rct (n = 10,454);23项试验(n = 3241)对主要结局有贡献。在12个月时,zBMI的汇总平均差异为-0.08 (95% CI -0.13至-0.03,p)。结论:对初级保健保健专业人员分娩或转诊的儿童进行行为体重管理干预导致zBMI适度降低。转介到基于社区的干预措施(例如HENRY)可能会产生更大的改善。
{"title":"A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials of Behavioral Interventions for the Management of Overweight and Obesity in Children That Are Delivered or Referred to by Health Providers in Primary Care.","authors":"Henrietta E Graham, Claire D Madigan, Kajal Gokal, Jessica F Large, James Sanders, Chris J McLeod, Natalie Pearson, Amanda J Daley","doi":"10.1111/obr.70119","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.70119","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Reducing childhood overweight and obesity prevalence is a global public health priority. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of behavioral weight management interventions delivered or referred to by health care providers in primary care settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of behavioral interventions published up to 05/01/2026, involving participants < 18 years with overweight or obesity, were identified through Cochrane, MEDLINE, PubMed, and PsychINFO. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Meta-analyses calculated pooled mean differences in zBMI and BMI using random effects models. The primary outcome was zBMI change at 12 months; secondary outcomes included zBMI changes at program end, last follow-up, and BMI at 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-nine RCTs (n = 10,454) were included; 23 trials (n = 3241) contributed to the primary outcome. At 12 months, the pooled mean difference in zBMI was -0.08 (95% CI -0.13 to -0.03, p < 0.01), favoring intervention groups. At program end (n = 30), the mean difference was -0.15 (95% CI -0.22 to -0.08), and at last follow-up (n = 37), -0.08 (95% CI -0.15 to -0.02). BMI at 12 months showed a mean difference of -0.37 (95% CI -0.72 to -0.01). Interventions referred to community settings achieved greater zBMI reductions (-0.14 [95% CI -0.2 to -0.08]) than those delivered within primary care (0.04 [95% CI -0.10 to 0.18]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Behavioral weight management interventions for children delivered or referred to by health care professionals in primary care led to modest reductions in zBMI. Referrals to community-based interventions (e.g., HENRY) may yield greater improvements.</p>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e70119"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147388930","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Hezekiah C T Au, Yang Jing Zheng, Gia Han Le, Sabrina Wong, Kayla M Teopiz, Angela T H Kwan, Joshua D Rosenblat, Rodrigo B Mansur, Hayun Choi, Roger S McIntyre
Introduction: Increased risk of suicidality has been reported in association with glucagon-like peptide receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) prescription. Herein, we conducted a comprehensive review evaluating reports of GLP-1 RA prescription and suicidality.
Methods: Relevant articles were retrieved from OVID (Medline, EMBASE, AMED, PsycINFO, JBI EBP Database), PubMed, and Web of Science from inception to May 20, 2024. Primary research examining the association between GLP-1 RAs (i.e., dulaglutide, exenatide, liraglutide, lixisenatide, semaglutide, tirzepatide) and suicidality were included for analysis.
Results: Our findings indicate liraglutide (reported odds ratio [ROR] = 3.26, 95% CI = 2.53, 4.22) and semaglutide (ROR = 1.73; 95% CI = 0.30, 0.80) are significantly associated with a greater odds ratio of reported suicidal ideation. Similarly, tirzepatide was associated with greater odds of reported suicidal ideation; however, this was nonsignificant (ROR = 1.49; 95% CI = -0.41, 1.21). Similarly, semaglutide (ROR = 8.81; 95% CI = 3.69, 21.04) and liraglutide (ROR = 3.74; 95% CI = 1.23, 11.38) are also associated with a greater odds ratio of reported suicidal depression. No significant association between other GLP-1 RAs and suicidality was observed.
Discussion: Reports of aspects of suicidality and exposure to select GLP-1 RAs exist; notwithstanding, no causality between GLP-1 RA exposure and suicidality is apparent.
导言:据报道,与胰高血糖素样肽受体激动剂(GLP-1 RA)处方相关的自杀风险增加。在此,我们对GLP-1 RA处方和自杀行为的报告进行了综合评价。方法:检索OVID (Medline、EMBASE、AMED、PsycINFO、JBI EBP数据库)、PubMed、Web of Science自成立以来至2024年5月20日的相关文章。研究GLP-1 RAs(即杜拉鲁肽、艾塞那肽、利拉鲁肽、利西塞那肽、西马鲁肽、替西帕肽)与自杀倾向之间关系的初步研究纳入分析。结果:我们的研究结果表明,利拉鲁肽(报告的比值比[ROR] = 3.26, 95% CI = 2.53, 4.22)和西马鲁肽(报告的比值比[ROR] = 1.73, 95% CI = 0.30, 0.80)与报告的自杀意念的较大比值比显著相关。同样,替西帕肽与报告的自杀意念的更高几率相关;然而,这是不显著的(ROR = 1.49; 95% CI = -0.41, 1.21)。同样,西马鲁肽(ROR = 8.81; 95% CI = 3.69, 21.04)和利拉鲁肽(ROR = 3.74; 95% CI = 1.23, 11.38)也与报告的自杀性抑郁症的优势比较大相关。其他GLP-1 RAs与自杀行为无显著关联。讨论:有关于自杀和暴露于特定GLP-1 RAs的报告;尽管如此,GLP-1 RA暴露与自杀之间没有明显的因果关系。
{"title":"Association of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Suicidality: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Hezekiah C T Au, Yang Jing Zheng, Gia Han Le, Sabrina Wong, Kayla M Teopiz, Angela T H Kwan, Joshua D Rosenblat, Rodrigo B Mansur, Hayun Choi, Roger S McIntyre","doi":"10.1111/obr.70120","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.70120","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Increased risk of suicidality has been reported in association with glucagon-like peptide receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) prescription. Herein, we conducted a comprehensive review evaluating reports of GLP-1 RA prescription and suicidality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Relevant articles were retrieved from OVID (Medline, EMBASE, AMED, PsycINFO, JBI EBP Database), PubMed, and Web of Science from inception to May 20, 2024. Primary research examining the association between GLP-1 RAs (i.e., dulaglutide, exenatide, liraglutide, lixisenatide, semaglutide, tirzepatide) and suicidality were included for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings indicate liraglutide (reported odds ratio [ROR] = 3.26, 95% CI = 2.53, 4.22) and semaglutide (ROR = 1.73; 95% CI = 0.30, 0.80) are significantly associated with a greater odds ratio of reported suicidal ideation. Similarly, tirzepatide was associated with greater odds of reported suicidal ideation; however, this was nonsignificant (ROR = 1.49; 95% CI = -0.41, 1.21). Similarly, semaglutide (ROR = 8.81; 95% CI = 3.69, 21.04) and liraglutide (ROR = 3.74; 95% CI = 1.23, 11.38) are also associated with a greater odds ratio of reported suicidal depression. No significant association between other GLP-1 RAs and suicidality was observed.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Reports of aspects of suicidality and exposure to select GLP-1 RAs exist; notwithstanding, no causality between GLP-1 RA exposure and suicidality is apparent.</p>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e70120"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147369028","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Xinran Xie, Yunhe Mao, Minghui Sun, Xinyu Zou, Yan Yang, Yiyuan Gao, Wei Xu, Lan Zhang, Leticia Kawano-Dourado, Arnav Agarwal, Jiafeng Li, Xia Hong, Yufang Bi, Ying Liu, Jing An, Jiahui Ma, Yuzi Cao, Kailei Nong, Jiyun Guo, Jing Zeng, Mengnan Zhao, Yibin Zhang, Qinbo Yang, Baihai Su, Changzheng Yuan, Changjian Qiu, Gordon Guyatt, Sheyu Li
Background: The efficacy of individual cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) components for managing pediatric obesity remains unclear. This study systematically evaluated the impacts of CBT and its constituent techniques in this population.
Method: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL from inception to July 17, 2024, for randomized controlled trials comparing CBT techniques or usual care targeting obesity management in children and adolescents with overweight or obesity. Component network meta-analyses provided estimates of effects of each component on obesity-related outcomes. We rated the certainty of evidence using modified GRADE approaches.
Results: We included 125 trials with 16,513 children and adolescents. For conceptual level components, compared with minimal education, behavioral therapy probably reduces body fat percentage (MD, -1.16%; 95% CI, -1.68% to -0.64%), waist circumference (MD, -1.70 cm; 95% CI, -2.74 to -0.67 cm), and improves quality of life (SMD, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.03-0.30). For technical-level components, when compared with minimal education, parental involvement (MD, -0.09; 95% CI, -0.16 to -0.03) and stimulus control (MD, -0.07; 95% CI, -0.12 to -0.01) probably reduce body mass index (BMI) z-score. Preplanning (MD, -3.05%; 95% CI, -5.82% to -0.28%) and feedback (MD, -2.73%; 95% CI, -5.31% to -0.14%) probably reduce body fat percentage, whereas device monitoring, problem-solving, rule-setting, and relaxation training might increase body fat percentage.
Interpretation: Behavioral therapy alone is likely effective for pediatric obesity management, irrespective of cognitive therapy integration. Techniques such as parental involvement, stimulus control, preplanning, and feedback should be prioritized in CBT.
{"title":"Cognitive Behavioral Interventions for Children and Adolescents With Overweight or Obesity: A Systematic Review and Component Network Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Xinran Xie, Yunhe Mao, Minghui Sun, Xinyu Zou, Yan Yang, Yiyuan Gao, Wei Xu, Lan Zhang, Leticia Kawano-Dourado, Arnav Agarwal, Jiafeng Li, Xia Hong, Yufang Bi, Ying Liu, Jing An, Jiahui Ma, Yuzi Cao, Kailei Nong, Jiyun Guo, Jing Zeng, Mengnan Zhao, Yibin Zhang, Qinbo Yang, Baihai Su, Changzheng Yuan, Changjian Qiu, Gordon Guyatt, Sheyu Li","doi":"10.1111/obr.70118","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.70118","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The efficacy of individual cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) components for managing pediatric obesity remains unclear. This study systematically evaluated the impacts of CBT and its constituent techniques in this population.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL from inception to July 17, 2024, for randomized controlled trials comparing CBT techniques or usual care targeting obesity management in children and adolescents with overweight or obesity. Component network meta-analyses provided estimates of effects of each component on obesity-related outcomes. We rated the certainty of evidence using modified GRADE approaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 125 trials with 16,513 children and adolescents. For conceptual level components, compared with minimal education, behavioral therapy probably reduces body fat percentage (MD, -1.16%; 95% CI, -1.68% to -0.64%), waist circumference (MD, -1.70 cm; 95% CI, -2.74 to -0.67 cm), and improves quality of life (SMD, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.03-0.30). For technical-level components, when compared with minimal education, parental involvement (MD, -0.09; 95% CI, -0.16 to -0.03) and stimulus control (MD, -0.07; 95% CI, -0.12 to -0.01) probably reduce body mass index (BMI) z-score. Preplanning (MD, -3.05%; 95% CI, -5.82% to -0.28%) and feedback (MD, -2.73%; 95% CI, -5.31% to -0.14%) probably reduce body fat percentage, whereas device monitoring, problem-solving, rule-setting, and relaxation training might increase body fat percentage.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Behavioral therapy alone is likely effective for pediatric obesity management, irrespective of cognitive therapy integration. Techniques such as parental involvement, stimulus control, preplanning, and feedback should be prioritized in CBT.</p>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e70118"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147369031","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background and objectives: Childhood obesity is a global public health issue with strong familial and intergenerational transmission. However, existing syntheses often overlook the active role of parents and fail to assess outcomes beyond the child. This systematic review and meta-analysis specifically investigate the effects of family-based interventions, which position parents as active co-agents of change, on health outcomes for both children with obesity and their parents.
Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. Six databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) targeting children with obesity and at least one family member. Primary outcomes were children's BMI z-score and parental BMI; secondary outcomes included other adiposity measures and dietary behaviors. Outcomes for both children and parents were synthesized. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on intervention characteristics. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2, and evidence certainty was evaluated using GRADE.
Results: Twenty RCTs with 1740 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The interventions demonstrated a significant reduction in children's BMI z-score. Additional benefits were observed for long-term BMI z-score and percentage of total body fat. The most effective interventions commonly integrate health education, behavioral strategies, and motivational support. Subgroup analyses indicated that interventions positioning parents as active co-participants, rather than mere supporters, yielded larger effects. However, no significant effects were found on parental BMI.
Conclusion: This study demonstrates that family-based interventions can confer significant benefits for children with obesity. Their success hinges on strategically framing parents as active co-agents and integrating motivational strategies.
{"title":"Effects of Family-Based Intervention for Childhood Obesity on Parental and Offspring Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Ying Zhang, Luojie Pang, Shenglan Yang, Jing Wu","doi":"10.1111/obr.70122","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.70122","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Childhood obesity is a global public health issue with strong familial and intergenerational transmission. However, existing syntheses often overlook the active role of parents and fail to assess outcomes beyond the child. This systematic review and meta-analysis specifically investigate the effects of family-based interventions, which position parents as active co-agents of change, on health outcomes for both children with obesity and their parents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. Six databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) targeting children with obesity and at least one family member. Primary outcomes were children's BMI z-score and parental BMI; secondary outcomes included other adiposity measures and dietary behaviors. Outcomes for both children and parents were synthesized. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on intervention characteristics. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2, and evidence certainty was evaluated using GRADE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty RCTs with 1740 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The interventions demonstrated a significant reduction in children's BMI z-score. Additional benefits were observed for long-term BMI z-score and percentage of total body fat. The most effective interventions commonly integrate health education, behavioral strategies, and motivational support. Subgroup analyses indicated that interventions positioning parents as active co-participants, rather than mere supporters, yielded larger effects. However, no significant effects were found on parental BMI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that family-based interventions can confer significant benefits for children with obesity. Their success hinges on strategically framing parents as active co-agents and integrating motivational strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e70122"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147353121","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Samira Behboudi-Gandevani, Tommy Haugan, Nayla Cristina Do Vale Moreira, Ellen Christin Arntzen, Moira Strand Hutchinson, Melanie Nichols, Razieh Bidhendi-Yarandi
Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify common life-course body mass index (BMI) trajectories (childhood/adulthood to adulthood) and their impact on risk of cancer overall and cancer at different sites in adulthood.
Methods: Observational studies were identified that assessed the association of BMI trajectories with cancer risks from databases published in English. The pooled effect sizes were estimated using a random-effects model.
Findings: A total of 24 eligible studies were included in the meta-analysis. Transitioning from normal weight to obesity was significantly associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer (effect size [ES] = 1.170, 95% CI: 1.096, 1.245), pancreatic cancer (ES = 1.337, 95% CI: 1.247, 1.426), kidney cancer (ES = 2.122, 95% CI: 1.619, 2.624), and liver cancer (ES = 1.777, 95% CI: 1.261, 2.293), compared to those in the stable normal weight trajectory. No significant difference in the risk of breast or prostate cancer was observed when comparing various BMI trajectories to a stable normal BMI trajectory.
Conclusion: The findings suggest that lifetime BMI trajectories influence cancer risk, with a transition from normal BMI to higher levels associated with an increased risk of cancer. The impact varied by trajectory and cancer type. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.
{"title":"Life Course Trajectories of Body Mass Index and Risk of Cancer in Adulthood: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Samira Behboudi-Gandevani, Tommy Haugan, Nayla Cristina Do Vale Moreira, Ellen Christin Arntzen, Moira Strand Hutchinson, Melanie Nichols, Razieh Bidhendi-Yarandi","doi":"10.1111/obr.70114","DOIUrl":"10.1111/obr.70114","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify common life-course body mass index (BMI) trajectories (childhood/adulthood to adulthood) and their impact on risk of cancer overall and cancer at different sites in adulthood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Observational studies were identified that assessed the association of BMI trajectories with cancer risks from databases published in English. The pooled effect sizes were estimated using a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 24 eligible studies were included in the meta-analysis. Transitioning from normal weight to obesity was significantly associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer (effect size [ES] = 1.170, 95% CI: 1.096, 1.245), pancreatic cancer (ES = 1.337, 95% CI: 1.247, 1.426), kidney cancer (ES = 2.122, 95% CI: 1.619, 2.624), and liver cancer (ES = 1.777, 95% CI: 1.261, 2.293), compared to those in the stable normal weight trajectory. No significant difference in the risk of breast or prostate cancer was observed when comparing various BMI trajectories to a stable normal BMI trajectory.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that lifetime BMI trajectories influence cancer risk, with a transition from normal BMI to higher levels associated with an increased risk of cancer. The impact varied by trajectory and cancer type. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e70114"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147363585","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Flavio T Vieira, ZhiDi Deng, Manfred J Muller, Giovanna G L Bergamasco, Sarah Cawsey, Melania Manco, Steven B Heymsfield, Carla M Prado, Andrea M Haqq
Introduction: Weight loss results in reduced energy expenditure (EE) due to body composition alterations (e.g., fat-free mass and fat mass losses) and mass-independent adaptations in EE (e.g., hormones). Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) are indicated for obesity management; however, their effects on EE remain unclear.
Methods: In this scoping review, we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, ProQuest, and Cochrane Library (inception to October 2025) for studies that investigated the effects of GLP-1RA (mono or combination therapy) on EE in humans.
Results: Twenty-three studies were included, 10 assessed GLP-1RA monotherapy (4 exenatide, 4 liraglutide, 1 semaglutide, 1 beinaglutide) and 13 combination therapy (11 dual, 2 triple agonists); drug regimen heterogeneity was high. Most studies assessed resting metabolic rate (RMR); 4 used 24-h whole-room indirect calorimetry; and none applied doubly labeled water. Eight studies (34.8%) concluded that GLP-1RA mono or combination therapy had non-significant effects on EE. Combination with glucagon produced varied impacts on EE components (RQ [n = 3], RMR [n = 1], and sleep metabolic rate [n = 1]), whereas combination with glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) decreased RQ and increased fat utilization (n = 1). Eleven studies (47.8%) produced inconclusive results due to the applied statistical analyses.
Conclusion: Acute or chronic GLP-1RA monotherapy does not appear to impact EE independent of weight loss. Combining GLP-1RA with glucagon or GIP may impact EE in different ways, requiring further exploration.
体重减轻导致能量消耗(EE)减少,这是由于身体成分的改变(如无脂肪质量和脂肪质量损失)和EE的质量独立适应(如激素)。胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)适用于肥胖管理;然而,它们对情感表达的影响尚不清楚。方法:在这一范围综述中,我们检索了MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, ProQuest和Cochrane Library(成立至2025年10月),以研究GLP-1RA(单药或联合治疗)对人类情感表达的影响。结果:纳入23项研究,10项评估GLP-1RA单药治疗(4项艾塞那肽,4项利拉鲁肽,1项semaglutide, 1项beinaglutide)和13项联合治疗(11项双激动剂,2项三联激动剂);药物方案异质性高。大多数研究评估静息代谢率(RMR);4 .采用24小时全室间接量热法;没有人使用双标签水。8项研究(34.8%)得出GLP-1RA单药或联合治疗对EE无显著影响的结论。与胰高血糖素联合使用会对EE组分(RQ [n = 3]、RMR [n = 1]和睡眠代谢率[n = 1])产生不同的影响,而与葡萄糖依赖性胰岛素性多肽(GIP)联合使用会降低RQ并增加脂肪利用率(n = 1)。11项研究(47.8%)由于应用统计分析结果不确定。结论:急性或慢性GLP-1RA单药治疗似乎不影响独立于体重减轻的EE。GLP-1RA与胰高血糖素或GIP联用可能以不同方式影响EE,有待进一步探索。
{"title":"Effects of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (Mono and Combination Therapy) on Energy Expenditure: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Flavio T Vieira, ZhiDi Deng, Manfred J Muller, Giovanna G L Bergamasco, Sarah Cawsey, Melania Manco, Steven B Heymsfield, Carla M Prado, Andrea M Haqq","doi":"10.1111/obr.70116","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.70116","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Weight loss results in reduced energy expenditure (EE) due to body composition alterations (e.g., fat-free mass and fat mass losses) and mass-independent adaptations in EE (e.g., hormones). Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) are indicated for obesity management; however, their effects on EE remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this scoping review, we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, ProQuest, and Cochrane Library (inception to October 2025) for studies that investigated the effects of GLP-1RA (mono or combination therapy) on EE in humans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three studies were included, 10 assessed GLP-1RA monotherapy (4 exenatide, 4 liraglutide, 1 semaglutide, 1 beinaglutide) and 13 combination therapy (11 dual, 2 triple agonists); drug regimen heterogeneity was high. Most studies assessed resting metabolic rate (RMR); 4 used 24-h whole-room indirect calorimetry; and none applied doubly labeled water. Eight studies (34.8%) concluded that GLP-1RA mono or combination therapy had non-significant effects on EE. Combination with glucagon produced varied impacts on EE components (RQ [n = 3], RMR [n = 1], and sleep metabolic rate [n = 1]), whereas combination with glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) decreased RQ and increased fat utilization (n = 1). Eleven studies (47.8%) produced inconclusive results due to the applied statistical analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Acute or chronic GLP-1RA monotherapy does not appear to impact EE independent of weight loss. Combining GLP-1RA with glucagon or GIP may impact EE in different ways, requiring further exploration.</p>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e70116"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147353159","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-12-10DOI: 10.1111/obr.70037
Yee Teng Lee, Ayça Akan, Dilara Beyza Önel, Evelyn Medawar, Daria E A Jensen, Arno Villringer, A Veronica Witte
Obesity is intricately associated with the gut microbiome, and emerging research suggests that lifestyle interventions, such as dietary changes and active lifestyle, can significantly affect the composition and function of the gut microbiome. However, evidence demonstrating a causal link between these changes and long-term weight loss or metabolic improvements remains limited. This systematic review investigates how overweight- and obesity-targeted interventions, such as dietary modifications, physical activity, supplementation with prebiotics and probiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), manipulate gut microbiome diversity and composition, major metabolites, and weight status. We conducted a systematic literature search and included 87 out of 255 randomized clinical trials with 6086 adults aged 18-84 with a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2. The quality of the included RCTs ranged from very low to moderate risk of bias. Most interventions did not cause any significant changes in microbial alpha or beta diversity, however, positive associations between prebiotic consumption and abundance of Actinobacteria and Bifidobacterium were observed, and intake of probiotics was related to increased levels of Lactobacillus and reduced body weight and body fat. We did not observe strong evidence for associations between SCFA levels, gut microbiome, and obesity. Overall, diversity and heterogeneity in reported outcomes, both in methods and results, were large. Taken together, our findings suggest that overweight- and obesity-targeted dietary interventions of at least 4 weeks, particularly those involving prebiotics and probiotics, have the potential to beneficially alter the gut microbiome, although standardized protocols and harmonized reporting are needed to confirm this through meta-analysis.
{"title":"Impacts of Lifestyle and Microbiota-Targeted Interventions for Overweight and Obesity on the Human Gut Microbiome: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Yee Teng Lee, Ayça Akan, Dilara Beyza Önel, Evelyn Medawar, Daria E A Jensen, Arno Villringer, A Veronica Witte","doi":"10.1111/obr.70037","DOIUrl":"10.1111/obr.70037","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Obesity is intricately associated with the gut microbiome, and emerging research suggests that lifestyle interventions, such as dietary changes and active lifestyle, can significantly affect the composition and function of the gut microbiome. However, evidence demonstrating a causal link between these changes and long-term weight loss or metabolic improvements remains limited. This systematic review investigates how overweight- and obesity-targeted interventions, such as dietary modifications, physical activity, supplementation with prebiotics and probiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), manipulate gut microbiome diversity and composition, major metabolites, and weight status. We conducted a systematic literature search and included 87 out of 255 randomized clinical trials with 6086 adults aged 18-84 with a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. The quality of the included RCTs ranged from very low to moderate risk of bias. Most interventions did not cause any significant changes in microbial alpha or beta diversity, however, positive associations between prebiotic consumption and abundance of Actinobacteria and Bifidobacterium were observed, and intake of probiotics was related to increased levels of Lactobacillus and reduced body weight and body fat. We did not observe strong evidence for associations between SCFA levels, gut microbiome, and obesity. Overall, diversity and heterogeneity in reported outcomes, both in methods and results, were large. Taken together, our findings suggest that overweight- and obesity-targeted dietary interventions of at least 4 weeks, particularly those involving prebiotics and probiotics, have the potential to beneficially alter the gut microbiome, although standardized protocols and harmonized reporting are needed to confirm this through meta-analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e70037"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12926627/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145720283","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-10-04DOI: 10.1111/obr.70029
Yuan-Hai Sun, Ya-Qian Feng, Sun-Ying Cheng, Ling-Huan Li, Han-Bing Li
Adipose tissue thermogenesis, both uncoupling protein 1 (UCP1)-dependent and independent thermogenesis, plays a critical role in the homeostasis of whole-body metabolism. Emerging evidence demonstrates that key nodes in adipose tissue thermogenesis can be regulated by dynamic and reversible N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification, which is one of the most prevalent and extensively studied RNA modifications. Furthermore, its dysregulation drives the pathogenesis of obesity and related metabolic disorders. In this review, we elucidate the role and molecular mechanisms of m6A modification in adipose tissue thermogenesis, highlight potential therapeutic strategies for promoting thermogenic remodeling of adipose tissue through targeting m6A modification, and discuss future research directions in this field. The insights provide clues for translational research aimed at developing m6A-based therapies for metabolic diseases.
脂肪组织产热,既包括解偶联蛋白1 (uncoupling protein 1, UCP1)依赖性产热,也包括非依赖性产热,在全身代谢的稳态中起关键作用。新的证据表明,脂肪组织产热的关键节点可以通过动态和可逆的n6 -甲基腺苷(m6A)修饰来调节,这是最普遍和广泛研究的RNA修饰之一。此外,它的失调驱动肥胖和相关代谢紊乱的发病机制。本文综述了m6A修饰在脂肪组织产热中的作用及分子机制,重点阐述了靶向m6A修饰促进脂肪组织产热重塑的潜在治疗策略,并讨论了该领域未来的研究方向。这些见解为旨在开发基于m6的代谢性疾病疗法的转化研究提供了线索。
{"title":"An Insight Into Adipose Tissue Thermogenesis Regulated by N<sup>6</sup>-Methyladenosine: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications.","authors":"Yuan-Hai Sun, Ya-Qian Feng, Sun-Ying Cheng, Ling-Huan Li, Han-Bing Li","doi":"10.1111/obr.70029","DOIUrl":"10.1111/obr.70029","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adipose tissue thermogenesis, both uncoupling protein 1 (UCP1)-dependent and independent thermogenesis, plays a critical role in the homeostasis of whole-body metabolism. Emerging evidence demonstrates that key nodes in adipose tissue thermogenesis can be regulated by dynamic and reversible N<sup>6</sup>-methyladenosine (m<sup>6</sup>A) modification, which is one of the most prevalent and extensively studied RNA modifications. Furthermore, its dysregulation drives the pathogenesis of obesity and related metabolic disorders. In this review, we elucidate the role and molecular mechanisms of m<sup>6</sup>A modification in adipose tissue thermogenesis, highlight potential therapeutic strategies for promoting thermogenic remodeling of adipose tissue through targeting m<sup>6</sup>A modification, and discuss future research directions in this field. The insights provide clues for translational research aimed at developing m<sup>6</sup>A-based therapies for metabolic diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e70029"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145224654","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-10-29DOI: 10.1111/obr.70034
{"title":"Correction to \"Clinical Significance and Therapeutic Approach Concerning Various Abdominal Adipose Tissue Irregularities in End-Stage Liver Disease\".","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/obr.70034","DOIUrl":"10.1111/obr.70034","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e70034"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145399370","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}