Spine Surgery and Related Research最新文献

Introduction: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) with a major curve at the main thoracic (MT) area is classified as Lenke type 1, 2, or 3 depending on the flexibility of the proximal thoracic (PT) curve and lumbar curve. No definite classification has been established for a major curve at the PT spine. The purpose of this study is to investigate the radiographic characteristics before and after correction surgery for AIS with a major curve at the PT area.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study at a single academic institution. Twelve patients with a major curve at the PT spine participated in our study and followed for at least two years after surgery. We evaluated the pre- and postoperative Cobb angles of the curve, curve range, location of the apex, sagittal parameters, and shoulder balance-related parameters. All patients were treated by posterior correction and fusion surgery using pedicle screw constructs.

Results: The patients were classified as having a double-curve (DC) type, in which the MT curve was structural, or a single-curve (SC) type, in which the MT curve was corrected to less than 25° on supine side-bending films. The mean correction rates for the PT curve were favorable in both groups (DC, 65.7%±9.6%; SC, 39.2%±4.9%). The mean Cobb angle of the lumbar curve improved in the DC group (preoperative, 17.1°±4.0°; postoperative, 5.0°±4.2°) but deteriorated in the SC group (preoperative, 7.1°±1.2°; postoperative, 12.4°±4.4°) after surgery.

Conclusions: We illustrated the postoperative radiographical changes of 12 consecutive patients with the major curve at the PT curve. Although posterior correction and fusion surgery corrected the PT curve satisfactorily in both DC and SC patients, the Cobb angle of the lumbar curve deteriorated after surgery in all SC patients. Surgeons need to pay attention to the fusion area, especially LIV, when operating the SC curve type.

Introduction: This study aims to investigate risk factors for cage subsidence following minimally invasive lateral corpectomy for osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Methods: Eight males and 13 females (77.2±6.0 years old) with osteoporotic vertebral fractures who underwent single corpectomy using a wide-footprint expandable cage with at least a 1-year follow-up were retrospectively included. The endplate cage (EC) angle was defined as the angle between the vertebral body's endplate and the cage's base on the cranial and caudal sides. A sagittal computed tomography scan was performed immediately after surgery and at the final follow-up, with cage subsidence defined as subsidence of ≥2 mm on the cranial or caudal side. Risk factors were analyzed by dividing cases into groups with (n=6) and without (n=15) cage subsidence.

Results: No significant differences were noted in age, bone mineral density, number of fixed vertebrae, sagittal parameters, preoperative and final kyphosis angle, amount of kyphosis angle correction, bone union, screw loosening, and number of other vertebral fractures preoperatively and 1-year postoperatively between the two groups. No difference was noted in cranial EC angle, but a significant difference was noted in caudal EC angle in the group with (10.7±4.1°) and without (4.7±4.2°) subsidence (P=0.008). Logistic regression analysis with the dependent variable as presence or absence of subsidence showed that caudal EC angle (>7.5°) was a significant factor (odds ratio: 20, 95% confidence interval: 1.655-241.7, P=0.018).

Conclusions: In minimally invasive lateral corpectomy for osteoporotic vertebral fractures, a cage tilted more than 7.5° to the caudal vertebral endplate is a risk factor for cage subsidence. The cage should be placed as perpendicular to the endplate as possible, especially to the caudal vertebral body, to avoid cage subsidence.

Introduction: Patients with cerebral palsy (CP) may receive intrathecal baclofen (ITB) to reduce muscle spasticity and dystonia. It can be challenging to identify the proper dose of ITB, and anecdotally these dosing needs may change after spinal fusion surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the need for changes in ITB dosing following a spinal fusion in pediatric neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS) patients and identify predisposing factors for those changes.

Methods: This was a retrospective case-control study of NMS patients with an ITB pump who later received a spinal fusion surgery. Dosing changes and the indications for the changes were postoperatively noted. Demographics, preoperative factors, and surgical factors were evaluated for correlation with dosing changes.

Results: A total of 49 patients were included in this study. Most had no change in ITB dose (71.4%), and others required a change that averaged about 10%. Male patients, those with larger pumps, and those that had a longer hospital stay were more likely to require a decrease in dose. Complications were similar between groups. Three catheters were revised during surgery: two continued on the same dose and one required an increase in dose after surgery.

Conclusions: Spinal fusion after ITB pump placement is feasible and safe. Most patients did not require dosing changes after spine fusion; however, careful evaluation postoperatively remains prudent.

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of condoliase injection therapy (CIT) for lateral lumbar disc herniation (LLDH).

Methods: This retrospective study included 157 of 180 enrolled patients (70 males, 87 females; mean age: 52.6±16.9 years). These patients were divided into two groups (group L: LLDH, group M: medial LDH [subligamentous and transligamentous]). From baseline to 1 year after injection (final follow-up), leg pain was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) and the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scoring for CIT's clinical efficacy of CIT. Radiography and magnetic resonance imaging conducted before and 3 months after the injection were assessed. Patients with a VAS improvement of ≥50% at the final follow-up were defined as responders. The responder and nonresponder LLDH groups were also compared.

Results: Groups L and M showed comparable responder rates (75.0% and 77.4%, respectively) (P=0.80). VAS and JOA scores at 1 year showed no significant differences between the groups (P=0.82 and 0.80, respectively). VAS score at 1 month after injection reduced considerably in the responder group compared with that in the nonresponder group (19.7 vs. 66.0, P<0.01) and continued to decrease at the last follow-up (3.5 vs. 52.0, P<0.001). Nonresponders had significantly lower disc heights after 3 months. However, intervertebral instability, alignment, and disc degeneration did not differ between the responders and nonresponders.

Conclusions: The response rate of CIT for LLDH was comparable to that for medial LDH. Therefore, CIT is an effective treatment for LLDH.