首页 > 最新文献

Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal最新文献

英文 中文
The Populist Fantasy: American Ethno-Nationalism and the Dysphoria of the Body Politic 民粹主义幻想:美国民族民族主义与身体政治的焦虑
Pub Date : 2019-07-29 DOI: 10.5325/SOUNDINGS.102.2-3.0226
Daniel Miller
Abstract:This article offers an analysis of the populism that is currently ascendent in U.S. politics and society, which takes an ethno-nationalist form. This article argues that contemporary American ethno-nationalism is fantastical in character, rather than being based on empirical political or social concerns. Bringing together the well-established image of the social as the “body politic,” Slavoj Žižek’s theory of political fantasy, and the insights of transgender theory, the article argues that contemporary American ethno-nationalism represents a dysphoric response to a social body experienced as fundamentally misshapen or deformed.
摘要:本文分析了当前在美国政治和社会中兴起的以民族主义为表现形式的民粹主义。本文认为,当代美国的种族民族主义在本质上是幻想的,而不是基于经验性的政治或社会关注。将社会作为“政治体”的良好形象、斯拉沃伊Žižek的政治幻想理论和跨性别理论的见解结合在一起,文章认为,当代美国的种族民族主义代表了对一个从根本上被视为畸形或变形的社会体的一种不安的反应。
{"title":"The Populist Fantasy: American Ethno-Nationalism and the Dysphoria of the Body Politic","authors":"Daniel Miller","doi":"10.5325/SOUNDINGS.102.2-3.0226","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/SOUNDINGS.102.2-3.0226","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article offers an analysis of the populism that is currently ascendent in U.S. politics and society, which takes an ethno-nationalist form. This article argues that contemporary American ethno-nationalism is fantastical in character, rather than being based on empirical political or social concerns. Bringing together the well-established image of the social as the “body politic,” Slavoj Žižek’s theory of political fantasy, and the insights of transgender theory, the article argues that contemporary American ethno-nationalism represents a dysphoric response to a social body experienced as fundamentally misshapen or deformed.","PeriodicalId":231294,"journal":{"name":"Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121793541","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
What Do People Want? Unscrambling Populism 人们想要什么?民粹主义解读
Pub Date : 2019-07-29 DOI: 10.5325/SOUNDINGS.102.2-3.0111
J. Pieterse
Abstract:Should a discussion of populism be concerned with populism, along with revulsion of its various extremisms, or should it rather be concerned with the failure of institutions and the misbehavior of elites in a world in which eight billionaires own as much as half the world population? The former option will yield a totally different and probably somewhat more predictable discussion than the latter, which may include “from bad to worse.” A third option is that different types of market economies yield different types of populism, including pluto-populism. This discussion follows the latter two options.
摘要:关于民粹主义的讨论应该关注民粹主义及其对各种极端主义的厌恶,还是应该关注在一个八个亿万富翁拥有世界一半人口的世界里,制度的失败和精英的不当行为?前一种选择将产生一种完全不同的,可能在某种程度上比后一种更可预测的讨论,其中可能包括“从坏到更坏”。第三种选择是,不同类型的市场经济产生不同类型的民粹主义,包括富豪民粹主义。本讨论遵循后两个选项。
{"title":"What Do People Want? Unscrambling Populism","authors":"J. Pieterse","doi":"10.5325/SOUNDINGS.102.2-3.0111","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/SOUNDINGS.102.2-3.0111","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Should a discussion of populism be concerned with populism, along with revulsion of its various extremisms, or should it rather be concerned with the failure of institutions and the misbehavior of elites in a world in which eight billionaires own as much as half the world population? The former option will yield a totally different and probably somewhat more predictable discussion than the latter, which may include “from bad to worse.” A third option is that different types of market economies yield different types of populism, including pluto-populism. This discussion follows the latter two options.","PeriodicalId":231294,"journal":{"name":"Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132676093","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Ethics, Identity, and Political Mediation in Right-Wing American Populism 美国右翼民粹主义中的伦理、认同与政治调解
Pub Date : 2019-07-29 DOI: 10.5325/SOUNDINGS.102.2-3.0158
Allen Dunn
Abstract:This article discusses the ethics of right-wing populism. Using the works of psychologist Jonathan Haidt, it argues that there is a fundamental difference in the ethical orientations of right-wing populists and their liberal opponents. This difference helps explain the populist distrust of deliberative dialogue. It also sheds light on the political polarization that has resulted from the recent culture wars.
摘要:本文探讨右翼民粹主义的伦理问题。利用心理学家乔纳森·海特(Jonathan Haidt)的作品,该书认为右翼民粹主义者和他们的自由派对手在道德取向上存在根本差异。这种差异有助于解释民粹主义者对协商对话的不信任。它还揭示了最近文化战争导致的政治两极分化。
{"title":"Ethics, Identity, and Political Mediation in Right-Wing American Populism","authors":"Allen Dunn","doi":"10.5325/SOUNDINGS.102.2-3.0158","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/SOUNDINGS.102.2-3.0158","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article discusses the ethics of right-wing populism. Using the works of psychologist Jonathan Haidt, it argues that there is a fundamental difference in the ethical orientations of right-wing populists and their liberal opponents. This difference helps explain the populist distrust of deliberative dialogue. It also sheds light on the political polarization that has resulted from the recent culture wars.","PeriodicalId":231294,"journal":{"name":"Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128033361","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Populism—A Crux or Crisis of Politics? Laclau versus Arendt 民粹主义——政治的症结还是危机?拉克劳与阿伦特之争
Pub Date : 2019-07-29 DOI: 10.5325/SOUNDINGS.102.2-3.0128
E. Ziarek
Abstract:This article juxtaposes Laclau’s defense of left-wing populism with Arendt’s theory of democratic alliances and political action. This juxtaposition adds two new questions to the debates on populism: First, what is the relation between popular political demands and populist identities? Second, is popular agency synonymous with popular sovereignty? Ultimately at stake in this debate is the articulation of political engagements that are able to provide an alternative to the right-wing mobilization of populism.
摘要:本文将拉克劳对左翼民粹主义的辩护与阿伦特的民主联盟和政治行动理论进行对比分析。这种并置给关于民粹主义的争论增加了两个新问题:第一,大众政治诉求与民粹主义身份之间的关系是什么?第二,人民代理是否等同于人民主权?这场辩论的最终利害攸关之处在于,能否为右翼动员民粹主义提供一种替代方案的政治参与。
{"title":"Populism—A Crux or Crisis of Politics? Laclau versus Arendt","authors":"E. Ziarek","doi":"10.5325/SOUNDINGS.102.2-3.0128","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/SOUNDINGS.102.2-3.0128","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article juxtaposes Laclau’s defense of left-wing populism with Arendt’s theory of democratic alliances and political action. This juxtaposition adds two new questions to the debates on populism: First, what is the relation between popular political demands and populist identities? Second, is popular agency synonymous with popular sovereignty? Ultimately at stake in this debate is the articulation of political engagements that are able to provide an alternative to the right-wing mobilization of populism.","PeriodicalId":231294,"journal":{"name":"Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128751578","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What’s the Matter with Populism? Feasting on the Remains of the Religious Right 民粹主义有什么问题?享用宗教权利的遗迹
Pub Date : 2019-07-29 DOI: 10.5325/SOUNDINGS.102.2-3.0261
J. Robbins
Abstract:This article provides a critical assessment of the populist nationalism associated with President Donald Trump. Using Thomas Frank’s “What’s the Matter with Kansas?” as an inspiration, it makes the argument that Trump’s populism is in fact a cover for a corporatist agenda. Further, it argues that the evangelical right’s support of Trump exposes the sense of white grievance that has animated its political mobilization from the start.
摘要:本文对与唐纳德·特朗普总统相关的民粹民族主义进行了批判性评估。引用托马斯·弗兰克的《堪萨斯怎么了?》作为一种灵感,它提出了这样的观点:特朗普的民粹主义实际上是社团主义议程的幌子。此外,它还认为,福音派右翼对特朗普的支持暴露了白人的不满情绪,这种情绪从一开始就激发了他们的政治动员。
{"title":"What’s the Matter with Populism? Feasting on the Remains of the Religious Right","authors":"J. Robbins","doi":"10.5325/SOUNDINGS.102.2-3.0261","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/SOUNDINGS.102.2-3.0261","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article provides a critical assessment of the populist nationalism associated with President Donald Trump. Using Thomas Frank’s “What’s the Matter with Kansas?” as an inspiration, it makes the argument that Trump’s populism is in fact a cover for a corporatist agenda. Further, it argues that the evangelical right’s support of Trump exposes the sense of white grievance that has animated its political mobilization from the start.","PeriodicalId":231294,"journal":{"name":"Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123603926","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Response to Daniel Miller, “The Populist Fantasy: American Ethno-Nationalism and the Dysphoria of the Body Politic” 对丹尼尔·米勒《民粹主义的幻想:美国民族主义与政治体的焦虑》的回应
Pub Date : 2019-07-29 DOI: 10.5325/SOUNDINGS.102.2-3.0253
K. Rees
Abstract:This response to Daniel Miller’s theoretical-philosophical reflection on the nature of a democratic social body offers a critique anchored in an empirically grounded comparative framework. Incorporating various internationally recognized benchmarks of political freedoms and civil liberties into Miller’s already well-developed analytical framework, which draws substantially on queer theory, provides a potentially stronger normative foundation for the discussion.
摘要:本文对丹尼尔·米勒关于民主社会主体本质的理论哲学反思的回应,提供了一种基于经验基础的比较框架的批判。将各种国际公认的政治自由和公民自由的基准纳入米勒已经发展完善的分析框架中,该框架主要借鉴了酷儿理论,为讨论提供了潜在的更强大的规范基础。
{"title":"Response to Daniel Miller, “The Populist Fantasy: American Ethno-Nationalism and the Dysphoria of the Body Politic”","authors":"K. Rees","doi":"10.5325/SOUNDINGS.102.2-3.0253","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/SOUNDINGS.102.2-3.0253","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This response to Daniel Miller’s theoretical-philosophical reflection on the nature of a democratic social body offers a critique anchored in an empirically grounded comparative framework. Incorporating various internationally recognized benchmarks of political freedoms and civil liberties into Miller’s already well-developed analytical framework, which draws substantially on queer theory, provides a potentially stronger normative foundation for the discussion.","PeriodicalId":231294,"journal":{"name":"Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal","volume":"65-66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134457821","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
“Populism” versus “Popular”: A Response to Ziarek’s “Populism—A Crux or Crisis of Politics?” “民粹主义”与“大众”:对齐亚雷克《民粹主义——政治的症结还是危机?》的回应
Pub Date : 2019-07-29 DOI: 10.5325/SOUNDINGS.102.2-3.0152
Tijen Demirel-Pegg
Abstract:This article discusses two main issues Ziarek highlights regarding populist social movements. The first one is the exclusionary stance populist movements take when contending for power in a democratic society. The second one is the repressive response to contenders when populist movements are in power. The underlying characteristic in both issues is that populists movements assume an anti-pluralist stance against other contending alternatives. Therefore, the distinction between “popular” and “populist” is an important one.
摘要:本文讨论了Ziarek强调的关于民粹主义社会运动的两个主要问题。首先是民粹主义运动在民主社会中争夺权力时采取的排他性立场。第二个是当民粹主义运动掌权时,对竞争者的压制性回应。这两个问题的潜在特征是,民粹主义运动对其他竞争对手采取了反多元主义立场。因此,区分“大众”和“民粹”是一个很重要的问题。
{"title":"“Populism” versus “Popular”: A Response to Ziarek’s “Populism—A Crux or Crisis of Politics?”","authors":"Tijen Demirel-Pegg","doi":"10.5325/SOUNDINGS.102.2-3.0152","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/SOUNDINGS.102.2-3.0152","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article discusses two main issues Ziarek highlights regarding populist social movements. The first one is the exclusionary stance populist movements take when contending for power in a democratic society. The second one is the repressive response to contenders when populist movements are in power. The underlying characteristic in both issues is that populists movements assume an anti-pluralist stance against other contending alternatives. Therefore, the distinction between “popular” and “populist” is an important one.","PeriodicalId":231294,"journal":{"name":"Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal","volume":"203 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133936611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Response to Peg Birmingham’s “Democracy, Populism, and the Production of Superfluousness: Three Lessons from Arendt’s Origins of Totalitarianism” 对佩格·伯明翰《民主、民粹主义与多余生产:阿伦特极权主义起源的三个教训》的回应
Pub Date : 2019-07-29 DOI: 10.5325/SOUNDINGS.102.2-3.0196
M. Morgan
{"title":"Response to Peg Birmingham’s “Democracy, Populism, and the Production of Superfluousness: Three Lessons from Arendt’s Origins of Totalitarianism”","authors":"M. Morgan","doi":"10.5325/SOUNDINGS.102.2-3.0196","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/SOUNDINGS.102.2-3.0196","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":231294,"journal":{"name":"Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal","volume":"138 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133079627","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Response to Allen Dunn’s “Ethics, Identity, and Political Mediation in Right-Wing American Populism” 对艾伦·邓恩《美国右翼民粹主义中的伦理、身份与政治调解》的回应
Pub Date : 2019-07-29 DOI: 10.5325/SOUNDINGS.102.2-3.0170
M. Bradley
Abstract:Allen Dunn’s article is based on American right-wing populist groups that feel undermined and alienated. Right-wing populist groups feel a sense of abandonment and that their real (or perceived) demands are not being addressed by the government. Dunn’s article could have advanced this conversation by addressing questions such as these: How does a federalist democracy like the United States reconcile opposition voices (or ideological-minority voices)? Likewise, who defines liberty, oppression, and subversion or fairness in society? And since all populist (left- and right-wing) groups tend to be anti-pluralist, how can political mediation in American-style democracy exist?
摘要:艾伦·邓恩的文章是基于美国右翼民粹主义团体感到被削弱和疏远。右翼民粹主义团体有一种被抛弃的感觉,他们真正的(或被认为的)要求没有得到政府的解决。邓恩的文章本可以通过解决以下问题来推进这一对话:像美国这样的联邦制民主国家如何调和反对派的声音(或意识形态上的少数派的声音)?同样,谁来定义社会中的自由、压迫、颠覆或公平?既然所有民粹主义(左翼和右翼)团体都倾向于反多元主义,那么美式民主的政治调解又如何存在呢?
{"title":"Response to Allen Dunn’s “Ethics, Identity, and Political Mediation in Right-Wing American Populism”","authors":"M. Bradley","doi":"10.5325/SOUNDINGS.102.2-3.0170","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/SOUNDINGS.102.2-3.0170","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Allen Dunn’s article is based on American right-wing populist groups that feel undermined and alienated. Right-wing populist groups feel a sense of abandonment and that their real (or perceived) demands are not being addressed by the government. Dunn’s article could have advanced this conversation by addressing questions such as these: How does a federalist democracy like the United States reconcile opposition voices (or ideological-minority voices)? Likewise, who defines liberty, oppression, and subversion or fairness in society? And since all populist (left- and right-wing) groups tend to be anti-pluralist, how can political mediation in American-style democracy exist?","PeriodicalId":231294,"journal":{"name":"Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal","volume":"2013 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128013550","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reflective Equilibrium, Judgments of Coherence, and Judgments of Beauty 反思性平衡、连贯性判断与美感判断
Pub Date : 2019-01-19 DOI: 10.5325/SOUNDINGS.102.1.0031
Devon Brickhouse-Bryson
Abstract:Reflective equilibrium is a powerful and popular method of theory evaluation. This article argues that the judgments of coherence required by the method are unexplained by the going accounts of reflective equilibrium and that they are best understood as a species of judgments of beauty. It argues that the distinctive feature of judgments of beauty is that they are unprincipled and yet nevertheless possible and that judgments of coherence share this distinctive feature. This conclusion entails that reflective equilibrium is a partially aesthetic method of theory evaluation and that part of using the method is evaluating candidate theories by their beauty.
摘要:反思均衡是一种强大而流行的理论评价方法。本文认为,该方法所要求的一致性判断是由反射平衡的持续描述所解释的,并且它们最好被理解为一种美的判断。它认为美的判断的显著特征是它们是无原则的,但仍然是可能的,而连贯性的判断也有这个显著特征。这一结论表明,反思平衡是一种部分美学的理论评价方法,使用这种方法的一部分是根据理论的美来评价候选理论。
{"title":"Reflective Equilibrium, Judgments of Coherence, and Judgments of Beauty","authors":"Devon Brickhouse-Bryson","doi":"10.5325/SOUNDINGS.102.1.0031","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/SOUNDINGS.102.1.0031","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Reflective equilibrium is a powerful and popular method of theory evaluation. This article argues that the judgments of coherence required by the method are unexplained by the going accounts of reflective equilibrium and that they are best understood as a species of judgments of beauty. It argues that the distinctive feature of judgments of beauty is that they are unprincipled and yet nevertheless possible and that judgments of coherence share this distinctive feature. This conclusion entails that reflective equilibrium is a partially aesthetic method of theory evaluation and that part of using the method is evaluating candidate theories by their beauty.","PeriodicalId":231294,"journal":{"name":"Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126059680","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
期刊
Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1