首页 > 最新文献

Tobacco Induced Diseases最新文献

英文 中文
Examining longitudinal associations between initial perceptions and experiences with electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) use and use patterns among adults who smoke and recently initiated ENDS. 研究使用电子尼古丁输送系统(ENDS)的最初看法和经验与吸烟成年人和最近开始使用ENDS的人的使用模式之间的纵向联系。
IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-09-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.18332/tid/193009
Michelle Mavreles Ogrodnick, Nikita G Kute, Vuong Van Do, Paige Wiley, Katherine Henderson, Claire A Spears, Terry F Pechacek, Scott R Weaver

Introduction: Limited data exist on factors associated with concurrent use patterns of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) and cigarettes. We examined longitudinally perceptions and experiences with ENDS in relationship to concurrent use patterns among established, recent smokers who recently initiated ENDS.

Methods: Participant recruitment took place using paid digital advertisements on social media. Between December 2020 and October 2021, 303 adults aged ≥21 years from across the US who currently or recently smoked and had initiated ENDS use within the past 30 days or reinitiated ENDS use after more than one year of non-use were surveyed. Multinomial logistic regressions were conducted to analyze association between the outcome of current use pattern at follow-up at 1 month [rejectors (discontinued ENDS, continued smoking), primary smokers (concurrent users, mostly smoke), dual user (similar smoking and ENDS use), primary vapers (concurrent users, mostly vape), and switchers (discontinued smoking, continued using ENDS) or quitters (discontinued both smoking and ENDS] and perceptions of and experiences with ENDS predictors at baseline.

Results: At follow-up at 1 to 2 months after initiating ENDS, 20% were rejectors, 31% were primary smokers, 13% were dual users, 19% were primary vapers, and 17% were switchers/quitters. Perceiving ENDS as less harmful than smoking or being uncertain and as equally or more enjoyable smoking, experiencing a lot or complete reduction in cravings to smoking and in irritability with ENDS use, liking the taste of ENDS, and being satisfied with vaping were associated with higher odds of quitting smoking compared to rejecting ENDS or mostly smoking at follow-up at 1 month.

Conclusions: Findings highlight the importance of initial ENDS perceptions and experiences when examining tobacco outcomes and potentially for developing policies and interventions targeting smoking cessation. ENDS initiators are differentiating into distinct use patterns based on these factors within a short period of time.

导言:有关同时使用电子尼古丁输送系统(ENDS)和香烟的相关因素的数据有限。我们纵向研究了最近开始使用ENDS的已吸烟者对ENDS的看法和体验与同时使用模式的关系:通过社交媒体上的付费数字广告招募参与者。2020 年 12 月至 2021 年 10 月期间,对全美 303 名年龄≥21 岁的成年人进行了调查,他们目前或最近吸烟,并在过去 30 天内开始使用 ENDS 或在超过一年未使用后重新开始使用 ENDS。我们进行了多项式逻辑回归,以分析随访 1 个月时当前使用模式的结果[拒绝者(停止使用 ENDS,继续吸烟)、主要吸烟者(同时使用,主要吸烟)、双重使用者(吸烟和使用 ENDS 相似)、主要吸食者(同时使用,主要吸食)、转换者(停止吸烟,继续使用 ENDS)或戒烟者(同时停止吸烟和 ENDS)]与基线时对 ENDS 预测因素的看法和经验之间的关联:在开始使用 ENDS 1 到 2 个月后的随访中,20% 的人拒绝使用,31% 的人主要吸烟,13% 的人双重使用,19% 的人主要吸食,17% 的人转换/戒烟。与拒绝使用ENDS或在1个月的随访中主要吸烟相比,认为ENDS的危害小于吸烟或不确定吸烟的危害,以及认为吸烟同样或更令人愉快,使用ENDS后对吸烟的渴望和烦躁感大量减少或完全消失,喜欢ENDS的味道,以及对吸食电子烟感到满意,都与更高的戒烟几率有关:研究结果凸显了ENDS最初的认知和体验对于研究烟草结果以及制定戒烟政策和干预措施的重要性。ENDS初始使用者在短时间内会根据这些因素形成不同的使用模式。
{"title":"Examining longitudinal associations between initial perceptions and experiences with electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) use and use patterns among adults who smoke and recently initiated ENDS.","authors":"Michelle Mavreles Ogrodnick, Nikita G Kute, Vuong Van Do, Paige Wiley, Katherine Henderson, Claire A Spears, Terry F Pechacek, Scott R Weaver","doi":"10.18332/tid/193009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/193009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Limited data exist on factors associated with concurrent use patterns of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) and cigarettes. We examined longitudinally perceptions and experiences with ENDS in relationship to concurrent use patterns among established, recent smokers who recently initiated ENDS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participant recruitment took place using paid digital advertisements on social media. Between December 2020 and October 2021, 303 adults aged ≥21 years from across the US who currently or recently smoked and had initiated ENDS use within the past 30 days or reinitiated ENDS use after more than one year of non-use were surveyed. Multinomial logistic regressions were conducted to analyze association between the outcome of current use pattern at follow-up at 1 month [rejectors (discontinued ENDS, continued smoking), primary smokers (concurrent users, mostly smoke), dual user (similar smoking and ENDS use), primary vapers (concurrent users, mostly vape), and switchers (discontinued smoking, continued using ENDS) or quitters (discontinued both smoking and ENDS] and perceptions of and experiences with ENDS predictors at baseline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At follow-up at 1 to 2 months after initiating ENDS, 20% were rejectors, 31% were primary smokers, 13% were dual users, 19% were primary vapers, and 17% were switchers/quitters. Perceiving ENDS as less harmful than smoking or being uncertain and as equally or more enjoyable smoking, experiencing a lot or complete reduction in cravings to smoking and in irritability with ENDS use, liking the taste of ENDS, and being satisfied with vaping were associated with higher odds of quitting smoking compared to rejecting ENDS or mostly smoking at follow-up at 1 month.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings highlight the importance of initial ENDS perceptions and experiences when examining tobacco outcomes and potentially for developing policies and interventions targeting smoking cessation. ENDS initiators are differentiating into distinct use patterns based on these factors within a short period of time.</p>","PeriodicalId":23202,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Induced Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11427937/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142354499","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Smoked, smokeless, and poly-tobacco use during pregnancy in relation to infant mortality in Cambodia: Findings from a nationwide sample. 柬埔寨孕期吸烟、无烟和多烟草使用与婴儿死亡率的关系:全国抽样调查结果。
IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-09-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.18332/tid/191718
Jiahao Peng, Anne Berit Petersen, David Shavlik, Daliao Xiao, Daravuth Yel, They Kheam, Pramil N Singh

Introduction: Maternal cigarette smoking during pregnancy is an established risk factor for adverse maternal, fetal, and infant outcomes. In contrast, maternal smokeless tobacco use (i.e. e-cigarettes, snus, betel quid, iqmik) during pregnancy has a more complex risk profile due to its potential use as a smoking cessation aid or to reduce the harm from smoking tobacco. The overall aim of this study was to investigate the association between smoked, smokeless, and poly-tobacco (smoked + smokeless) use during pregnancy and infant mortality, in a national sample of women in Cambodia.

Methods: The study used data from the National Adult Tobacco Survey of Cambodia (NATSC) that employed sampling methods and tobacco survey items from the CDC Global Adult Tobacco Survey but also included a supplement on reproductive health and birthing history. We selected 5342 women of the NATSC who reported complete data on at least one pregnancy, and our unit of analysis was the 15998 pregnancies from these women. We conducted a multivariable logistic regression to relate tobacco use to infant mortality. Taylor linearized variance estimators were used to account for clustering by sampling unit and mother.

Results: We found that smokeless tobacco in the form of a betel quid was the most common form of tobacco used during pregnancy. In multivariable logistic regression, we found increased odds of infant death for all tobacco use categories (smoked, smokeless), but that the strongest effects were seen for habits that included smokeless tobacco (relative to never use of tobacco in any form): exclusive use of smokeless tobacco (adjusted odds ratio, AOR=2.08; 95% CI: 1.15-3.76), and poly-tobacco use (AOR=5.68; 95% CI: 1.03-31.46). In more detailed analyses that considered the composition of the betel quid (tobacco, areca nut/leaf, slaked lime), we found that even chewing of tobacco leaves with no processing or additives was associated with a three-fold increase in odds of infant death relative to a never user (AOR=3.05; 95% CI: 1.45-6.45).

Conclusions: We found that even among those pregnant women who limited their nicotine habit to chewing tobacco leaves with no processing or additives, there remained higher odds of fetal or infant death from that pregnancy.

介绍:孕产妇在妊娠期间吸烟是导致孕产妇、胎儿和婴儿不良结局的既定风险因素。相比之下,妊娠期母亲使用无烟烟草(即:电子烟、鼻烟、槟榔、伊克米克)具有更复杂的风险特征,因为它可能被用作戒烟辅助工具或减少吸烟的危害。本研究的总体目标是调查柬埔寨全国妇女样本中孕期吸烟、无烟和多烟草(吸烟+无烟)使用与婴儿死亡率之间的关系:研究使用了柬埔寨全国成人烟草调查(NATSC)的数据,该调查采用了美国疾病预防控制中心全球成人烟草调查的抽样方法和烟草调查项目,但也包括有关生殖健康和分娩史的补充内容。我们从 NATSC 调查中选取了 5342 名报告了至少一次怀孕完整数据的妇女,以这些妇女的 15998 次怀孕为分析单位。我们进行了多变量逻辑回归,将烟草使用与婴儿死亡率联系起来。我们使用泰勒线性化方差估计器来考虑抽样单位和母亲的聚类:结果:我们发现槟榔片形式的无烟烟草是孕期最常使用的烟草形式。在多变量逻辑回归中,我们发现所有烟草使用类别(有烟、无烟)的婴儿死亡几率都会增加,但包括无烟烟草在内的习惯(相对于从未使用任何形式的烟草)的影响最大:完全使用无烟烟草(调整后的几率比,AOR=2.08;95% CI:1.15-3.76),以及多种烟草使用(AOR=5.68;95% CI:1.03-31.46)。在对槟榔的成分(烟草、槟榔/叶、熟石灰)进行更详细的分析时,我们发现即使是咀嚼未经加工或添加剂的烟叶,婴儿死亡的几率也会比从不吸烟者增加三倍(AOR=3.05;95% CI:1.45-6.45):我们发现,即使孕妇的尼古丁使用习惯仅限于咀嚼未经加工或添加剂的烟叶,其妊娠期胎儿或婴儿死亡的几率仍然较高。
{"title":"Smoked, smokeless, and poly-tobacco use during pregnancy in relation to infant mortality in Cambodia: Findings from a nationwide sample.","authors":"Jiahao Peng, Anne Berit Petersen, David Shavlik, Daliao Xiao, Daravuth Yel, They Kheam, Pramil N Singh","doi":"10.18332/tid/191718","DOIUrl":"10.18332/tid/191718","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Maternal cigarette smoking during pregnancy is an established risk factor for adverse maternal, fetal, and infant outcomes. In contrast, maternal smokeless tobacco use (i.e. e-cigarettes, snus, betel quid, iqmik) during pregnancy has a more complex risk profile due to its potential use as a smoking cessation aid or to reduce the harm from smoking tobacco. The overall aim of this study was to investigate the association between smoked, smokeless, and poly-tobacco (smoked + smokeless) use during pregnancy and infant mortality, in a national sample of women in Cambodia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study used data from the National Adult Tobacco Survey of Cambodia (NATSC) that employed sampling methods and tobacco survey items from the CDC Global Adult Tobacco Survey but also included a supplement on reproductive health and birthing history. We selected 5342 women of the NATSC who reported complete data on at least one pregnancy, and our unit of analysis was the 15998 pregnancies from these women. We conducted a multivariable logistic regression to relate tobacco use to infant mortality. Taylor linearized variance estimators were used to account for clustering by sampling unit and mother.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that smokeless tobacco in the form of a betel quid was the most common form of tobacco used during pregnancy. In multivariable logistic regression, we found increased odds of infant death for all tobacco use categories (smoked, smokeless), but that the strongest effects were seen for habits that included smokeless tobacco (relative to never use of tobacco in any form): exclusive use of smokeless tobacco (adjusted odds ratio, AOR=2.08; 95% CI: 1.15-3.76), and poly-tobacco use (AOR=5.68; 95% CI: 1.03-31.46). In more detailed analyses that considered the composition of the betel quid (tobacco, areca nut/leaf, slaked lime), we found that even chewing of tobacco leaves with no processing or additives was associated with a three-fold increase in odds of infant death relative to a never user (AOR=3.05; 95% CI: 1.45-6.45).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found that even among those pregnant women who limited their nicotine habit to chewing tobacco leaves with no processing or additives, there remained higher odds of fetal or infant death from that pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23202,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Induced Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11418014/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142308627","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Changes of campus tobacco control environment and the impact on tobacco control behaviors among secondary school personnel in Shanghai, China. 中国上海中学生校园控烟环境的变化及其对控烟行为的影响。
IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-09-20 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.18332/tid/191763
Nuo Chen, Luojia Dai, Juanjuan Wang, Lulu Zhang, Jingfen Zhu

Introduction: Youth smoking is a serious public health problem. Nevertheless, a rigorous tobacco-free environment within schools, combined with exemplary tobacco control behavior among school personnel can effectively contribute to reducing adolescent smoking. This study compared the tobacco control environment in Shanghai secondary schools in 2017 and 2021, and explored how the tobacco control environment influenced the tobacco control behaviors of school personnel.

Methods: Two cross-sectional studies were conducted from October to December 2017 and October to December 2021, using stratified cluster random sampling method, and 2403 and 1761 valid questionnaires were collected, respectively. The chi-squared test was used to test the differences between categorical variables. Binary logistic regression was conducted using survey data from 2021 to explore the influencing factors of staff's tobacco control behaviors.

Results: Compared with 2017, the percentages of staff members who were current smokers, had smoked on campus in the past year and were exposed to secondhand smoke (SHS) on campus in the past 7 days in 2021 decreased by 2.95%, 2.30% and 8.91%, respectively. However, the proportion of personnel who knew the school had organized tobacco control education decreased. Furthermore, school personnel who had received tobacco control education and agreed the school should strictly prohibit students from smoking (AOR=1.64; 95% CI: 1.25-2.15) were more likely to inform about the harm of tobacco to students. Those who had participated in tobacco control education activities or tobacco control trainings (AOR=1.87; 95% CI: 1.30-2.69) and believed that the school did not strictly prohibit either students (AOR=0.30; 95% CI: 0.22-0.41) or personnel (AOR=0.46; 95% CI: 0.36-0.59) from smoking were more inclined to stop students from smoking.

Conclusions: Compared with 2017, the rates of smoking and secondhand smoke exposure among school personnel decreased in 2021, but some schools still lacked comprehensive education on tobacco control behaviors for the staff. Enhancing the health literacy and strengthening tobacco control education among staff were effective strategies to encouraging their active adoption of tobacco control behaviors.

引言青少年吸烟是一个严重的公共卫生问题。然而,学校内严格的无烟环境与学校工作人员模范的控烟行为相结合,可以有效地减少青少年吸烟。本研究比较了2017年和2021年上海市中学的控烟环境,并探讨了控烟环境如何影响学校工作人员的控烟行为:采用分层整群随机抽样方法,分别于2017年10月至12月和2021年10月至12月进行了两次横断面研究,回收有效问卷2403份和1761份。采用卡方检验法检验分类变量之间的差异。利用2021年的调查数据进行二元逻辑回归,探讨员工控烟行为的影响因素:与2017年相比,2021年目前吸烟、过去一年在校园内吸烟和过去7天在校园内接触二手烟(SHS)的教职工比例分别下降了2.95%、2.30%和8.91%。但是,知道学校组织过控烟教育的人员比例有所下降。此外,接受过控烟教育并同意学校应严格禁止学生吸烟的学校工作人员(AOR=1.64;95% CI:1.25-2.15)更有可能向学生宣传烟草的危害。参加过控烟教育活动或控烟培训(AOR=1.87;95% CI:1.30-2.69),并认为学校没有严格禁止学生(AOR=0.30;95% CI:0.22-0.41)或人员(AOR=0.46;95% CI:0.36-0.59)吸烟的人更倾向于阻止学生吸烟.结论:与2017年相比,2021年学校教职工吸烟率和二手烟暴露率有所下降,但部分学校仍缺乏对教职工的全面控烟行为教育。提高教职工健康素养、加强控烟教育是鼓励教职工积极采取控烟行为的有效策略。
{"title":"Changes of campus tobacco control environment and the impact on tobacco control behaviors among secondary school personnel in Shanghai, China.","authors":"Nuo Chen, Luojia Dai, Juanjuan Wang, Lulu Zhang, Jingfen Zhu","doi":"10.18332/tid/191763","DOIUrl":"10.18332/tid/191763","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Youth smoking is a serious public health problem. Nevertheless, a rigorous tobacco-free environment within schools, combined with exemplary tobacco control behavior among school personnel can effectively contribute to reducing adolescent smoking. This study compared the tobacco control environment in Shanghai secondary schools in 2017 and 2021, and explored how the tobacco control environment influenced the tobacco control behaviors of school personnel.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two cross-sectional studies were conducted from October to December 2017 and October to December 2021, using stratified cluster random sampling method, and 2403 and 1761 valid questionnaires were collected, respectively. The chi-squared test was used to test the differences between categorical variables. Binary logistic regression was conducted using survey data from 2021 to explore the influencing factors of staff's tobacco control behaviors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with 2017, the percentages of staff members who were current smokers, had smoked on campus in the past year and were exposed to secondhand smoke (SHS) on campus in the past 7 days in 2021 decreased by 2.95%, 2.30% and 8.91%, respectively. However, the proportion of personnel who knew the school had organized tobacco control education decreased. Furthermore, school personnel who had received tobacco control education and agreed the school should strictly prohibit students from smoking (AOR=1.64; 95% CI: 1.25-2.15) were more likely to inform about the harm of tobacco to students. Those who had participated in tobacco control education activities or tobacco control trainings (AOR=1.87; 95% CI: 1.30-2.69) and believed that the school did not strictly prohibit either students (AOR=0.30; 95% CI: 0.22-0.41) or personnel (AOR=0.46; 95% CI: 0.36-0.59) from smoking were more inclined to stop students from smoking.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with 2017, the rates of smoking and secondhand smoke exposure among school personnel decreased in 2021, but some schools still lacked comprehensive education on tobacco control behaviors for the staff. Enhancing the health literacy and strengthening tobacco control education among staff were effective strategies to encouraging their active adoption of tobacco control behaviors.</p>","PeriodicalId":23202,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Induced Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11413989/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142296212","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prevalence, mortality and risk factors for self-reported COPD among smokers and never smokers, NHANES 1999-2018. 吸烟者和从不吸烟者自述慢性阻塞性肺病的患病率、死亡率和风险因素,NHANES 1999-2018 年。
IF 3.7 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI: 10.18332/tid/192745
Xiaohua Li,Minwei Xue,Donggang Xu,Caiyun Fan,Jianquan Zhang
INTRODUCTIONCigarette smoke is the main risk factor for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but 25% to 50% of cases occur in non-smokers. In the US, limited recent national data compare COPD prevalence between smokers and never smokers. Furthermore, our study seeks to explore the prevalence and mortality of self-reported COPD among smokers (including current smokers and ex-smokers) and never smokers in the US from 1999 to 2018, and to identify the risk factors and differences.METHODSThis cross-sectional analysis used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2018. Age-standardized prevalence of self-reported COPD among current smokers, ex-smokers, and never smokers was calculated using sample weights and 2010 US Census estimates. Risk factors were evaluated through weighted logistic regression models. Subsequently, participants who enrolled in the study cohort were followed until 31 December 2019, to determine all-cause mortality rates.RESULTSBetween 1999 and 2018, the weighted prevalence of COPD among current smokers, ex-smokers, and never smokers in the U.S. was 12.6%, 9.6%, and 4.1%, respectively. The mortality rates observed were 21.1% among current smokers with COPD, 29% among ex-smokers with COPD, and 12% among never smokers with COPD. Over this period, among the general population in the U.S., the proportion of current smokers has declined, the proportion of never smokers has increased, and the proportion of ex-smokers has remained relatively stable. From 1999 to 2018, COPD prevalence rose from 13.7% to 21.9% among current smokers, stayed at 10.1% among ex-smokers, and dropped from 4.9% to 3.3% among never smokers. Independent risk factors for COPD across all groups included being female, older, and lower income. In particular, US citizens and non-Hispanic Whites (among ex-smokers and never smokers) were at higher risk compared to their counterparts.CONCLUSIONSThe prevalence and all-cause mortality of COPD among current smokers and ex-smokers remain elevated. Although the prevalence of COPD among never smokers is gradually declining, it continues to be significant, thereby maintaining a substantial burden of disease. Furthermore, common independent risk factors for COPD across current smokers, ex-smokers, and never smokers include female gender, advanced age, lower income, and deviations from normal body weight whether overweight or underweight.
导言吸烟是慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)的主要危险因素,但 25% 至 50% 的病例发生在非吸烟者身上。在美国,对吸烟者和从不吸烟者的慢性阻塞性肺病患病率进行比较的最新全国性数据非常有限。此外,我们的研究旨在探讨 1999 年至 2018 年美国吸烟者(包括当前吸烟者和戒烟者)和从不吸烟者之间自我报告的慢性阻塞性肺病的患病率和死亡率,并确定风险因素和差异。使用样本权重和 2010 年美国人口普查估计值计算了当前吸烟者、戒烟者和从不吸烟者中自我报告的慢性阻塞性肺病年龄标准化患病率。通过加权逻辑回归模型对风险因素进行了评估。随后,对加入研究队列的参与者进行随访,直至 2019 年 12 月 31 日,以确定全因死亡率。结果1999 年至 2018 年间,美国当前吸烟者、戒烟者和从不吸烟者中 COPD 的加权患病率分别为 12.6%、9.6% 和 4.1%。在患有慢性阻塞性肺病的当前吸烟者中,死亡率为 21.1%;在患有慢性阻塞性肺病的已戒烟者中,死亡率为 29%;在患有慢性阻塞性肺病的从不吸烟者中,死亡率为 12%。在此期间,在美国普通人群中,当前吸烟者的比例有所下降,从不吸烟者的比例有所上升,而曾经吸烟者的比例相对稳定。从 1999 年到 2018 年,慢性阻塞性肺病的患病率在当前吸烟者中从 13.7% 上升到 21.9%,在戒烟者中保持在 10.1%,而在从不吸烟者中从 4.9% 下降到 3.3%。在所有群体中,慢性阻塞性肺病的独立风险因素包括女性、年龄较大和收入较低。尤其是美国公民和非西班牙裔白人(在戒烟者和从不吸烟者中)与同类人群相比风险更高。结论目前吸烟者和戒烟者中慢性阻塞性肺病的患病率和全因死亡率仍然很高。虽然慢性阻塞性肺病在从不吸烟者中的发病率正在逐渐下降,但其发病率仍然很高,因此仍然存在很大的疾病负担。此外,在当前吸烟者、戒烟者和从不吸烟者中,慢性阻塞性肺病的常见独立风险因素包括女性性别、高龄、低收入以及偏离正常体重(超重或体重不足)。
{"title":"Prevalence, mortality and risk factors for self-reported COPD among smokers and never smokers, NHANES 1999-2018.","authors":"Xiaohua Li,Minwei Xue,Donggang Xu,Caiyun Fan,Jianquan Zhang","doi":"10.18332/tid/192745","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/192745","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTIONCigarette smoke is the main risk factor for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but 25% to 50% of cases occur in non-smokers. In the US, limited recent national data compare COPD prevalence between smokers and never smokers. Furthermore, our study seeks to explore the prevalence and mortality of self-reported COPD among smokers (including current smokers and ex-smokers) and never smokers in the US from 1999 to 2018, and to identify the risk factors and differences.METHODSThis cross-sectional analysis used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2018. Age-standardized prevalence of self-reported COPD among current smokers, ex-smokers, and never smokers was calculated using sample weights and 2010 US Census estimates. Risk factors were evaluated through weighted logistic regression models. Subsequently, participants who enrolled in the study cohort were followed until 31 December 2019, to determine all-cause mortality rates.RESULTSBetween 1999 and 2018, the weighted prevalence of COPD among current smokers, ex-smokers, and never smokers in the U.S. was 12.6%, 9.6%, and 4.1%, respectively. The mortality rates observed were 21.1% among current smokers with COPD, 29% among ex-smokers with COPD, and 12% among never smokers with COPD. Over this period, among the general population in the U.S., the proportion of current smokers has declined, the proportion of never smokers has increased, and the proportion of ex-smokers has remained relatively stable. From 1999 to 2018, COPD prevalence rose from 13.7% to 21.9% among current smokers, stayed at 10.1% among ex-smokers, and dropped from 4.9% to 3.3% among never smokers. Independent risk factors for COPD across all groups included being female, older, and lower income. In particular, US citizens and non-Hispanic Whites (among ex-smokers and never smokers) were at higher risk compared to their counterparts.CONCLUSIONSThe prevalence and all-cause mortality of COPD among current smokers and ex-smokers remain elevated. Although the prevalence of COPD among never smokers is gradually declining, it continues to be significant, thereby maintaining a substantial burden of disease. Furthermore, common independent risk factors for COPD across current smokers, ex-smokers, and never smokers include female gender, advanced age, lower income, and deviations from normal body weight whether overweight or underweight.","PeriodicalId":23202,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Induced Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142253345","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Associations of weight control related behaviors with current cigarette smoking among Chinese adolescents: Results from an ongoing school-based survey in Zhejiang province. 中国青少年体重控制相关行为与当前吸烟的关系:浙江省正在进行的一项校本调查的结果。
IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-09-14 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.18332/tid/192001
Meng Wang, Jue Xu, Haiping Fang, Liping Yang, Tao Yang, Jianqiang Fan, Xiaofu Du, Chunxiao Xu, Yunqi Guan, Jieming Zhong, Min Yu

Introduction: Previous studies have suggested that adolescents may smoke cigarettes to control weight, but relevant research is scarce in Chinese youth. This study was conducted to examine the associations of weight control related behaviors with cigarette smoking in Chinese students.

Methods: This was a secondary analysis of data for 24835 middle and high school students drawn from the 2022 Zhejiang Youth Risk Behavior Survey of China which collected self-reported information of cigarette smoking, weight control strategies and other health-related behaviors. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate the adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the study associations.

Results: Overall, there were 998 (4.02%) current cigarette smokers in this wave of the Zhejiang YRBS (2022). Neither trying to control weight nor healthy weight control behavior of exercising was associated with current cigarette smoking (AOR=1.15; 95% CI: 0.97-1.37 and AOR=1.01; 95% CI: 0.85-1.20, respectively). Meanwhile, unhealthy weight control behaviors of taking laxatives (AOR=1.52; 95% CI: 1.03-2.26), taking diet pills (AOR=1.82; 95% CI: 1.26-2.62), dieting (AOR=1.24; 95% CI: 1.04-1.49), and fasting (AOR=1.81; 95% CI: 1.40-2.34) were significantly associated with increased odds of current cigarette smoking.

Conclusions: Screening and developing interventions for unhealthy weight control behaviors should be considered as part of smoking prevention programs among adolescents.

导言:以往的研究表明,青少年吸烟可能是为了控制体重,但针对中国青少年的相关研究却很少。本研究旨在探讨中国学生控制体重的相关行为与吸烟的关系:本研究对 2022 年中国浙江省青少年危险行为调查中 24835 名初高中学生的数据进行了二次分析,该调查收集了学生关于吸烟、体重控制策略和其他健康相关行为的自我报告信息。研究使用多变量逻辑回归模型估算了研究相关性的调整赔率(AOR)和 95% 的置信区间(CI):在这一波浙江省青年健康状况调查(2022年)中,共有998人(4.02%)目前吸烟。试图控制体重或运动的健康体重控制行为均与当前吸烟无关(AOR=1.15;95% CI:0.97-1.37 和 AOR=1.01;95% CI:0.85-1.20)。同时,服用泻药(AOR=1.52;95% CI:1.03-2.26)、服用减肥药(AOR=1.82;95% CI:1.26-2.62)、节食(AOR=1.24;95% CI:1.04-1.49)和禁食(AOR=1.81;95% CI:1.40-2.34)等不健康的体重控制行为与目前吸烟的几率增加显著相关:结论:在青少年吸烟预防计划中,应考虑对不健康的体重控制行为进行筛查并制定干预措施。
{"title":"Associations of weight control related behaviors with current cigarette smoking among Chinese adolescents: Results from an ongoing school-based survey in Zhejiang province.","authors":"Meng Wang, Jue Xu, Haiping Fang, Liping Yang, Tao Yang, Jianqiang Fan, Xiaofu Du, Chunxiao Xu, Yunqi Guan, Jieming Zhong, Min Yu","doi":"10.18332/tid/192001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/192001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Previous studies have suggested that adolescents may smoke cigarettes to control weight, but relevant research is scarce in Chinese youth. This study was conducted to examine the associations of weight control related behaviors with cigarette smoking in Chinese students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a secondary analysis of data for 24835 middle and high school students drawn from the 2022 Zhejiang Youth Risk Behavior Survey of China which collected self-reported information of cigarette smoking, weight control strategies and other health-related behaviors. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate the adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the study associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, there were 998 (4.02%) current cigarette smokers in this wave of the Zhejiang YRBS (2022). Neither trying to control weight nor healthy weight control behavior of exercising was associated with current cigarette smoking (AOR=1.15; 95% CI: 0.97-1.37 and AOR=1.01; 95% CI: 0.85-1.20, respectively). Meanwhile, unhealthy weight control behaviors of taking laxatives (AOR=1.52; 95% CI: 1.03-2.26), taking diet pills (AOR=1.82; 95% CI: 1.26-2.62), dieting (AOR=1.24; 95% CI: 1.04-1.49), and fasting (AOR=1.81; 95% CI: 1.40-2.34) were significantly associated with increased odds of current cigarette smoking.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Screening and developing interventions for unhealthy weight control behaviors should be considered as part of smoking prevention programs among adolescents.</p>","PeriodicalId":23202,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Induced Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11401605/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142296211","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An observational study of the marketing practice of e-cigarette specialty stores in two large cities in China: Is there potential to normalize the use of e-cigarettes? 对中国两大城市电子烟专卖店营销行为的观察研究:是否有可能使电子烟的使用正常化?
IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-09-14 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.18332/tid/191840
Hui Deng, Ling Fang, Lingyun Zhang, Sisi Wen, Shuai Zhang, Fan Wang, Pinpin Zheng

Introduction: Supervision measures in China have designated offline retail as the only legal channel for the sale and advertising of e-cigarettes. Specialty stores, exclusively selling vaping devices and e-liquids, are professionally designed to showcase company images and provide the best examples of e-cigarette marketing strategies. The goal was to analyze the retail marketing practice of e-cigarette specialty stores and provide a scientific reference for future e-cigarette point-of-sale regulation.

Methods: On-site observations were conducted in specialty stores among the popular business districts of Chengdu and Shanghai, China, from January to May 2021. 'Dianping', known as 'Chinese Yelp', was used to identify 8 business districts in Shanghai and 5 in Chengdu as observation sites. Two trained observers visited each store in the identified business districts. The data were collected with a checklist, which consisted of 5 sections with 37 items, including basic information, marketing practice, age restriction and health warnings.

Results: In total, 161 e-cigarette specialty stores, including 82 specialty stores in Shanghai and 79 in Chengdu, were identified. Of these stores, 156 were single-brand retailers and 5 were multi-brand retailers. Each store displayed e-cigarette products, which were visible from outside the store. The most common e-cigarette products were rechargeable kits and nicotine-containing e-liquids, which were available at all specialty stores. Frequent forms of promotion were free e-liquid samples (100%) and slogans (57.8%). Signage stating prohibition of minor use and purchase was presented at 141 (87.6%) specialty stores. Relatively few specialty stores (31.7%) displayed health warnings.

Conclusions: E-cigarette specialty stores featured highly visible product displays, varied product selections, abundant marketing materials, free trial services, absent entry restrictions for minors, and a lack of health warnings. Policymakers should move to reduce youth exposure to e-cigarette products and marketing in the retail environment by strengthening regulations on product display and marketing.

导言:中国的监管措施规定,线下零售是电子烟销售和广告的唯一合法渠道。专卖店专门销售电子烟设备和电子烟液,经过专业设计,展示公司形象,是电子烟营销策略的最佳范例。我们的目标是分析电子烟专卖店的零售营销实践,为今后的电子烟销售点监管提供科学参考:方法:2021 年 1 月至 5 月,对中国成都和上海热门商业区的电子烟专卖店进行了现场观察。通过被称为 "中国 Yelp "的 "大众点评",确定了上海的 8 个商圈和成都的 5 个商圈作为观察点。两名训练有素的观察员在确定的商圈内走访了每家商店。数据收集采用核对表的形式,核对表由 5 个部分共 37 个项目组成,包括基本信息、营销行为、年龄限制和健康警示:结果:总共确定了 161 家电子烟专卖店,其中上海 82 家,成都 79 家。其中,156 家为单一品牌零售商,5 家为多品牌零售商。每家专卖店都展示了电子烟产品,这些产品在店外就能看到。最常见的电子烟产品是充电套装和含尼古丁的电子烟液,所有专卖店都有售。最常见的促销方式是免费电子烟样品(100%)和标语(57.8%)。有 141 家(87.6%)专卖店打出了禁止未成年人使用和购买的标语。展示健康警示的专卖店相对较少(31.7%):电子烟专卖店的特点是产品陈列醒目、产品选择多样、营销材料丰富、提供免费试用服务、不限制未成年人进入以及缺乏健康警示。政策制定者应通过加强对产品展示和营销的监管,减少青少年在零售环境中接触电子烟产品和营销的机会。
{"title":"An observational study of the marketing practice of e-cigarette specialty stores in two large cities in China: Is there potential to normalize the use of e-cigarettes?","authors":"Hui Deng, Ling Fang, Lingyun Zhang, Sisi Wen, Shuai Zhang, Fan Wang, Pinpin Zheng","doi":"10.18332/tid/191840","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/191840","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Supervision measures in China have designated offline retail as the only legal channel for the sale and advertising of e-cigarettes. Specialty stores, exclusively selling vaping devices and e-liquids, are professionally designed to showcase company images and provide the best examples of e-cigarette marketing strategies. The goal was to analyze the retail marketing practice of e-cigarette specialty stores and provide a scientific reference for future e-cigarette point-of-sale regulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>On-site observations were conducted in specialty stores among the popular business districts of Chengdu and Shanghai, China, from January to May 2021. 'Dianping', known as 'Chinese Yelp', was used to identify 8 business districts in Shanghai and 5 in Chengdu as observation sites. Two trained observers visited each store in the identified business districts. The data were collected with a checklist, which consisted of 5 sections with 37 items, including basic information, marketing practice, age restriction and health warnings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 161 e-cigarette specialty stores, including 82 specialty stores in Shanghai and 79 in Chengdu, were identified. Of these stores, 156 were single-brand retailers and 5 were multi-brand retailers. Each store displayed e-cigarette products, which were visible from outside the store. The most common e-cigarette products were rechargeable kits and nicotine-containing e-liquids, which were available at all specialty stores. Frequent forms of promotion were free e-liquid samples (100%) and slogans (57.8%). Signage stating prohibition of minor use and purchase was presented at 141 (87.6%) specialty stores. Relatively few specialty stores (31.7%) displayed health warnings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>E-cigarette specialty stores featured highly visible product displays, varied product selections, abundant marketing materials, free trial services, absent entry restrictions for minors, and a lack of health warnings. Policymakers should move to reduce youth exposure to e-cigarette products and marketing in the retail environment by strengthening regulations on product display and marketing.</p>","PeriodicalId":23202,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Induced Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11401606/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142296210","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Geographical location, cigarette risk perceptions, and current smoking among older US adults. 美国老年人的地理位置、吸烟风险认知和当前吸烟情况。
IF 3.7 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI: 10.18332/tid/191827
Jenny E Ozga,Cassandra A Stanton,James D Sargent,Alexander W Steinberg,Zhiqun Tang,Laura M Paulin
INTRODUCTIONCigarette smoking and smoking-related lung disease are more common in rural (vs urban) areas of the United States (US). This study examined relationships between geographical location, cigarette risk perceptions, and current smoking among older adults who are at greatest risk of developing smoking-related lung disease.METHODSThe study was a secondary data analysis of 12126 respondents aged ≥40 years from Wave 5 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study. Weighted descriptive statistics and Poisson regressions assessed current smoking (vs never or former) as a function of geographical location in a stepwise fashion, first unadjusted, then adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics, and finally for both sociodemographic characteristics and cigarette risk perceptions (4-item scale), in three separate models. Sensitivity analyses examined whether individual risk perceptions items had a greater impact on the association between geographical location and current smoking.RESULTSCurrent smoking was more common among rural (20.6%) than urban (17.6%) residents. The risk ratio (RR) for rural (vs urban) residence on current smoking decreased from 1.17 (95% CI: 1.03-1.32) to 1.14 (95% CI: 1.01-1.29) to 1.08 (95% CI: 0.96-1.21) across the stepwise models. Lower cigarette risk perceptions confounded the rural-current smoking association and was an independent risk factor for smoking (adjusted RR, ARR=2.15; 95% CI: 1.94-2.18). In sensitivity analyses, believing that cigarettes are very or extremely (vs somewhat, slightly, or not at all) harmful to health and agreeing (vs not agreeing) that secondhand smoke causes lung disease in people who do not smoke, confounded the rural-current smoking association whereas beliefs about smoking causing lung cancer or lung disease in people who smoke did not.CONCLUSIONSLower cigarette risk perceptions among rural residents confounded the positive association between rural residence and current smoking. Results from sensitivity analyses highlight potential targets for communication campaigns aimed at promoting more accurate perceptions of the harmful health consequences of cigarette smoking.
简介在美国农村地区(相对于城市地区),吸烟和与吸烟相关的肺部疾病更为常见。本研究探讨了地理位置、卷烟风险认知与最易患吸烟相关肺病的老年人当前吸烟情况之间的关系。方法本研究对烟草与健康人口评估研究第 5 波中年龄≥40 岁的 12126 名受访者进行了二次数据分析。通过加权描述性统计和泊松回归,在三个独立模型中逐步评估了当前吸烟(与从不吸烟或曾经吸烟)与地理位置的关系,首先是未调整,然后是调整社会人口特征,最后是调整社会人口特征和卷烟风险认知(4 项量表)。敏感性分析检验了单个风险认知项目是否对地理位置与当前吸烟之间的关系有更大的影响。结果当前吸烟的农村居民(20.6%)比城市居民(17.6%)更常见。在逐步模型中,农村(与城市)居民与当前吸烟的风险比(RR)从1.17(95% CI:1.03-1.32)降至1.14(95% CI:1.01-1.29),再降至1.08(95% CI:0.96-1.21)。较低的卷烟风险认知混淆了农村与当前吸烟的关系,是吸烟的一个独立风险因素(调整RR,ARR=2.15;95% CI:1.94-2.18)。在敏感性分析中,认为香烟对健康非常有害或极其有害(vs 稍微有害、轻微有害或完全有害)以及同意(vs 不同意)二手烟会导致不吸烟者肺部疾病的观点会混淆农村居民与当前吸烟的关系,而认为吸烟会导致肺癌或吸烟者肺部疾病的观点则不会混淆农村居民与当前吸烟的关系。敏感性分析的结果突出了旨在促进人们更准确地认识吸烟对健康的有害影响的宣传活动的潜在目标。
{"title":"Geographical location, cigarette risk perceptions, and current smoking among older US adults.","authors":"Jenny E Ozga,Cassandra A Stanton,James D Sargent,Alexander W Steinberg,Zhiqun Tang,Laura M Paulin","doi":"10.18332/tid/191827","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/191827","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTIONCigarette smoking and smoking-related lung disease are more common in rural (vs urban) areas of the United States (US). This study examined relationships between geographical location, cigarette risk perceptions, and current smoking among older adults who are at greatest risk of developing smoking-related lung disease.METHODSThe study was a secondary data analysis of 12126 respondents aged ≥40 years from Wave 5 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study. Weighted descriptive statistics and Poisson regressions assessed current smoking (vs never or former) as a function of geographical location in a stepwise fashion, first unadjusted, then adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics, and finally for both sociodemographic characteristics and cigarette risk perceptions (4-item scale), in three separate models. Sensitivity analyses examined whether individual risk perceptions items had a greater impact on the association between geographical location and current smoking.RESULTSCurrent smoking was more common among rural (20.6%) than urban (17.6%) residents. The risk ratio (RR) for rural (vs urban) residence on current smoking decreased from 1.17 (95% CI: 1.03-1.32) to 1.14 (95% CI: 1.01-1.29) to 1.08 (95% CI: 0.96-1.21) across the stepwise models. Lower cigarette risk perceptions confounded the rural-current smoking association and was an independent risk factor for smoking (adjusted RR, ARR=2.15; 95% CI: 1.94-2.18). In sensitivity analyses, believing that cigarettes are very or extremely (vs somewhat, slightly, or not at all) harmful to health and agreeing (vs not agreeing) that secondhand smoke causes lung disease in people who do not smoke, confounded the rural-current smoking association whereas beliefs about smoking causing lung cancer or lung disease in people who smoke did not.CONCLUSIONSLower cigarette risk perceptions among rural residents confounded the positive association between rural residence and current smoking. Results from sensitivity analyses highlight potential targets for communication campaigns aimed at promoting more accurate perceptions of the harmful health consequences of cigarette smoking.","PeriodicalId":23202,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Induced Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142253348","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
On the extension of the use of a standard operating procedure for nicotine, glycerol and propylene glycol analysis in e-liquids using mass spectrometry. 关于推广使用质谱分析电子液体中尼古丁、甘油和丙二醇的标准操作程序。
IF 3.7 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI: 10.18332/tid/191823
Alessia Turina,Alice Passoni,Silvano Gallus,Alessandra Lugo,Walther Klerx,Reinskje Talhout,Ranti Fayokun,Constantine Vardavas,Enrico Davoli
INTRODUCTIONStandard operating procedures (SOP), accessible to several laboratories, are essential for product verification. EU-JATC (European-Joint Action on Tobacco Control) SOP and the WHO TobLabNet (World Health Organization Tobacco Laboratories Network) SOP (SOP11) are available standard methodologies to measure nicotine, glycerol, and propylene glycol, and propose mass spectrometer (MS) as an alternative method to flame ionization detector (FID). This study conducted a comparison between FID and MS concentration results, following the MS method described in SOP11.METHODSIn May 2020, five test e-liquids in replicates (A-E) were prepared at the Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri and sent, with SOP 11, validation document and results datasheet to 32 different laboratories all over the world from WHO TobLabNet and EU-JATC (18 from JATC, ten from WHO TobLabNet and four academic laboratories). Among thirty-two independent laboratories that participated in the study, results were received from 30 laboratories.RESULTSThe e-liquids analyses, using the two approaches, were compared. Of the 30 laboratories surveyed, 21 utilized the FID approach exclusively, 7 opted for MS detection, and 2 employed both methods. The findings demonstrated that the gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) method offers comparable analytical capabilities regarding accuracy and precision for nicotine, glycerol, and propylene glycol to the FID approach. Through Pearson's correlation test with r≃1 showing a positive correlation between GC-FID and GC-MS data, and the Student's t-test, no significant differences between the two approaches were revealed, showing p>0.005 for almost all three analytes in all samples.CONCLUSIONSThis study indicates that it is possible to apply the available EU-JATC SOP and the WHO TobLabNet SOP11 even in laboratories that do not have access to an FID, for example, to analyze flavors, trace compounds or carcinogenic, mutagenic, or toxic for reproduction (CMR) in electronic cigarette liquids.
引言 标准操作程序(SOP)对产品验证至关重要,多个实验室均可使用。EU-JATC(欧洲烟草控制联合行动)标准操作程序和 WHO TobLabNet(世界卫生组织烟草实验室网络)标准操作程序(SOP11)是测量尼古丁、甘油和丙二醇的可用标准方法,并建议用质谱仪(MS)作为火焰离子化检测器(FID)的替代方法。2020 年 5 月,马里奥-内格里农业科学研究所制备了五种测试电子液体的重复样品(A-E),并连同 SOP 11、验证文件和结果数据表发送给来自世界卫生组织 TobLabNet 和欧盟-JATC 的全球 32 个不同实验室(18 个来自 JATC,10 个来自世界卫生组织 TobLabNet,4 个来自学术实验室)。在参与研究的 32 家独立实验室中,有 30 家实验室提供了结果。在接受调查的 30 家实验室中,21 家实验室完全采用了 FID 方法,7 家实验室选择了 MS 检测方法,2 家实验室同时采用了这两种方法。研究结果表明,气相色谱-质谱(GC-MS)方法在尼古丁、甘油和丙二醇的准确度和精确度方面的分析能力与 FID 方法相当。通过皮尔逊相关性检验(r≃1)和学生 t 检验,GC-FID 和 GC-MS 数据之间呈正相关,两种方法之间无显著差异,所有样品中几乎所有三种分析物的 p 均大于 0.005。结论本研究表明,即使在没有 FID 的实验室,也可以应用现有的 EU-JATC SOP 和 WHO TobLabNet SOP11 分析电子烟液体中的香精、痕量化合物或致癌、致突变或生殖毒性(CMR)。
{"title":"On the extension of the use of a standard operating procedure for nicotine, glycerol and propylene glycol analysis in e-liquids using mass spectrometry.","authors":"Alessia Turina,Alice Passoni,Silvano Gallus,Alessandra Lugo,Walther Klerx,Reinskje Talhout,Ranti Fayokun,Constantine Vardavas,Enrico Davoli","doi":"10.18332/tid/191823","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/191823","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTIONStandard operating procedures (SOP), accessible to several laboratories, are essential for product verification. EU-JATC (European-Joint Action on Tobacco Control) SOP and the WHO TobLabNet (World Health Organization Tobacco Laboratories Network) SOP (SOP11) are available standard methodologies to measure nicotine, glycerol, and propylene glycol, and propose mass spectrometer (MS) as an alternative method to flame ionization detector (FID). This study conducted a comparison between FID and MS concentration results, following the MS method described in SOP11.METHODSIn May 2020, five test e-liquids in replicates (A-E) were prepared at the Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri and sent, with SOP 11, validation document and results datasheet to 32 different laboratories all over the world from WHO TobLabNet and EU-JATC (18 from JATC, ten from WHO TobLabNet and four academic laboratories). Among thirty-two independent laboratories that participated in the study, results were received from 30 laboratories.RESULTSThe e-liquids analyses, using the two approaches, were compared. Of the 30 laboratories surveyed, 21 utilized the FID approach exclusively, 7 opted for MS detection, and 2 employed both methods. The findings demonstrated that the gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) method offers comparable analytical capabilities regarding accuracy and precision for nicotine, glycerol, and propylene glycol to the FID approach. Through Pearson's correlation test with r≃1 showing a positive correlation between GC-FID and GC-MS data, and the Student's t-test, no significant differences between the two approaches were revealed, showing p>0.005 for almost all three analytes in all samples.CONCLUSIONSThis study indicates that it is possible to apply the available EU-JATC SOP and the WHO TobLabNet SOP11 even in laboratories that do not have access to an FID, for example, to analyze flavors, trace compounds or carcinogenic, mutagenic, or toxic for reproduction (CMR) in electronic cigarette liquids.","PeriodicalId":23202,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Induced Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142186058","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of smoking conventional cigarettes and using heated tobacco products on the olfactory and gustatory function in healthy young adults: A cross-sectional study. 比较吸传统香烟和使用加热烟草制品对健康年轻人嗅觉和味觉功能的影响:横断面研究
IF 3.7 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI: 10.18332/tid/192524
Ella Sever,Daniela Kovačević Pavičić,Aleksandar Pupovac,Ema Saltović,Stjepan Špalj,Irena Glažar
INTRODUCTIONSmoking has a negative impact on the chemosensory function. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of smoking experience and type of tobacco products on gustatory and olfactory function.METHODSThis study included 30 conventional cigarette smokers, 30 heated tobacco products (HTPs) users, and 30 non-smokers. Olfactory function was assessed with a 'Sniffin' Sticks Screening 12 Test' while the taste function was assessed with 'taste strips' for the basic tastes of sweet, sour, salty, and bitter. The lifetime exposure to smoking was calculated using the Brinkman index (BI).RESULTSConventional cigarette smokers demonstrated decreased olfactory function in comparison to non-smokers (median: 10 vs 11; p=0.001) but HTPs users did not differ between those two groups. Overall gustatory function was lower in conventional cigarette smokers (median: 9.5) and HTPs users (median: 10) than in non-smokers (median: 14; p<0.001). A difference was detected in the sour, salty and bitter taste but without significant difference between HTPs users and conventional cigarette smokers. Negative linear correlations were found between the BI and olfactory function, overall gustatory function, sour, salty, and bitter taste (r= -0.317 - -0.585; p≤0.002). In multiple linear regression, BI was the only predictor of olfactory dysfunction when controlling for the effect of tobacco products, age, and gender accounting for 11% of variance (p=0.024, R2=0.123). For gustatory dysfunction, BI was the strongest predictor followed by gender and tobacco products accounting for 11%, 5%, and 4% (p<0.001, R2=0.259).CONCLUSIONSOlfactory and gustatory function are adversely associated with smoking, more depending on BI than tobacco product.
引言吸烟对化学感觉功能有负面影响。本研究的目的是评估吸烟经历和烟草制品类型对味觉和嗅觉功能的影响。方法本研究包括 30 名传统卷烟吸烟者、30 名加热烟草制品(HTPs)使用者和 30 名非吸烟者。嗅觉功能通过 "嗅棒筛查 12 项测试 "进行评估,味觉功能则通过 "味条 "对甜、酸、咸、苦等基本味道进行评估。结果与非吸烟者相比,传统吸烟者的嗅觉功能下降(中位数:10 vs 11;P=0.001),但 HTPs 使用者在这两组人之间没有差异。传统吸烟者(中位数:9.5)和 HTPs 使用者(中位数:10)的总体味觉功能低于非吸烟者(中位数:14;P<0.001)。在酸、咸和苦味方面发现了差异,但 HTPs 使用者与传统吸烟者之间没有显著差异。BI 与嗅觉功能、总体味觉功能、酸味、咸味和苦味之间呈负线性相关(r= -0.317 -0.585; p≤0.002)。在多元线性回归中,当控制了烟草制品、年龄和性别的影响后,BI 是嗅觉功能障碍的唯一预测因子,占方差的 11%(p=0.024,R2=0.123)。结论嗅觉和味觉功能与吸烟有不利关系,更多取决于嗅觉和味觉功能而非烟草制品。
{"title":"Comparison of smoking conventional cigarettes and using heated tobacco products on the olfactory and gustatory function in healthy young adults: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Ella Sever,Daniela Kovačević Pavičić,Aleksandar Pupovac,Ema Saltović,Stjepan Špalj,Irena Glažar","doi":"10.18332/tid/192524","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/192524","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTIONSmoking has a negative impact on the chemosensory function. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of smoking experience and type of tobacco products on gustatory and olfactory function.METHODSThis study included 30 conventional cigarette smokers, 30 heated tobacco products (HTPs) users, and 30 non-smokers. Olfactory function was assessed with a 'Sniffin' Sticks Screening 12 Test' while the taste function was assessed with 'taste strips' for the basic tastes of sweet, sour, salty, and bitter. The lifetime exposure to smoking was calculated using the Brinkman index (BI).RESULTSConventional cigarette smokers demonstrated decreased olfactory function in comparison to non-smokers (median: 10 vs 11; p=0.001) but HTPs users did not differ between those two groups. Overall gustatory function was lower in conventional cigarette smokers (median: 9.5) and HTPs users (median: 10) than in non-smokers (median: 14; p<0.001). A difference was detected in the sour, salty and bitter taste but without significant difference between HTPs users and conventional cigarette smokers. Negative linear correlations were found between the BI and olfactory function, overall gustatory function, sour, salty, and bitter taste (r= -0.317 - -0.585; p≤0.002). In multiple linear regression, BI was the only predictor of olfactory dysfunction when controlling for the effect of tobacco products, age, and gender accounting for 11% of variance (p=0.024, R2=0.123). For gustatory dysfunction, BI was the strongest predictor followed by gender and tobacco products accounting for 11%, 5%, and 4% (p<0.001, R2=0.259).CONCLUSIONSOlfactory and gustatory function are adversely associated with smoking, more depending on BI than tobacco product.","PeriodicalId":23202,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Induced Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142186059","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative study of lung cancer between smokers and nonsmokers: A real-world study based on the whole population from Tianjin City, China. 吸烟者与非吸烟者肺癌比较研究:基于中国天津市全体人口的真实世界研究。
IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-09-09 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.18332/tid/192191
Wenlong Zheng, Guohong Jiang, Chong Wang, Luning Xun, Chengfeng Shen, Shuang Zhang, Hui Zhang, Qingxin Zhou, Meiqiu Xie, Xiaodan Xue, Dezheng Wang, Jun Lv

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and changing trends of non-smokers with lung cancer (LC) based on data from a population-wide cancer registry in northern China.

Methods: The study used LC incidence and follow-up data from 2010 to 2019 from the Cancer Registry System of Tianjin city, which included 82769 cases. Trends in the incidence and proportion of non-smokers with LC were examined by joinpoint regression analysis. Life table and Cox survival analyses were used to calculate the survival rates and compare the death hazard ratios (HRs) in different groups, respectively.

Results: Among the 82769 new diagnosis cases of LC during 2010 to 2019, there were 34589 (41.8%) current smokers, 14913 (18.0%) ex-smokers, 28123 (34.0%) non-smokers, and 5144 (6.2%) unknowns. The proportion of non-smokers changed slightly from 2010 (35.36%) to 2019 (36.87%) (annual percentage change, APC= -0.01%, p>0.05). This proportion declined in men (2010 vs 2019; 22.06% vs 20.66%) and increased in women (2010 vs 2019; 53.02% vs 62.35%), and in the 0-44 years age group it showed an upward trend from 2015 to 2019 (APC=4.82%, 95% CI: 1.8-7.9). Compared with smokers with LC, non-smokers with LC were predominantly females (64.15% vs 27.26%), had a predominantly adenocarcinoma histological subtypes (76.71% vs 42.22%), and had a 20% lower risk of death than smokers (HR=0.80; 95% CI: 0.78-0.81).

Conclusions: The proportion of non-smokers with LC was relatively high in northern China, with an increasing trend in the proportion of females and younger age groups. Non-smokers with LC had different epidemiological and clinical characteristics compared with smokers with LC.

简介:本研究的目的是根据中国北方人口癌症登记数据,研究非吸烟者肺癌(LC)的患病率、临床特征和变化趋势:本研究的目的是基于中国北方全人群癌症登记数据,研究非吸烟者肺癌(LC)的患病率、临床特征和变化趋势:研究使用了天津市肿瘤登记系统 2010 年至 2019 年的肺癌发病率和随访数据,共纳入 82769 例病例。通过连接点回归分析研究了非吸烟者中 LC 发病率和比例的变化趋势。采用生命表和Cox生存分析法分别计算不同组别的生存率和比较死亡危险比(HRs):在2010年至2019年期间新诊断的82769例LC病例中,有34589人(41.8%)为现吸烟者,14913人(18.0%)为戒烟者,28123人(34.0%)为非吸烟者,5144人(6.2%)为未知者。非吸烟者的比例从 2010 年(35.36%)到 2019 年(36.87%)略有变化(年度百分比变化,APC=-0.01%,P>0.05)。该比例在男性中有所下降(2010 vs 2019; 22.06% vs 20.66%),在女性中有所上升(2010 vs 2019; 53.02% vs 62.35%),在 0-44 岁年龄组中,该比例从 2015 年到 2019 年呈上升趋势(APC=4.82%,95% CI:1.8-7.9)。与患有肺癌的吸烟者相比,患有肺癌的非吸烟者以女性为主(64.15% vs 27.26%),组织学亚型以腺癌为主(76.71% vs 42.22%),死亡风险比吸烟者低20%(HR=0.80;95% CI:0.78-0.81):在中国北方,非吸烟者中患 LC 的比例相对较高,女性和年轻群体的比例呈上升趋势。与吸烟者相比,非吸烟者 LC 患者具有不同的流行病学和临床特征。
{"title":"Comparative study of lung cancer between smokers and nonsmokers: A real-world study based on the whole population from Tianjin City, China.","authors":"Wenlong Zheng, Guohong Jiang, Chong Wang, Luning Xun, Chengfeng Shen, Shuang Zhang, Hui Zhang, Qingxin Zhou, Meiqiu Xie, Xiaodan Xue, Dezheng Wang, Jun Lv","doi":"10.18332/tid/192191","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/192191","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and changing trends of non-smokers with lung cancer (LC) based on data from a population-wide cancer registry in northern China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study used LC incidence and follow-up data from 2010 to 2019 from the Cancer Registry System of Tianjin city, which included 82769 cases. Trends in the incidence and proportion of non-smokers with LC were examined by joinpoint regression analysis. Life table and Cox survival analyses were used to calculate the survival rates and compare the death hazard ratios (HRs) in different groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 82769 new diagnosis cases of LC during 2010 to 2019, there were 34589 (41.8%) current smokers, 14913 (18.0%) ex-smokers, 28123 (34.0%) non-smokers, and 5144 (6.2%) unknowns. The proportion of non-smokers changed slightly from 2010 (35.36%) to 2019 (36.87%) (annual percentage change, APC= -0.01%, p>0.05). This proportion declined in men (2010 vs 2019; 22.06% vs 20.66%) and increased in women (2010 vs 2019; 53.02% vs 62.35%), and in the 0-44 years age group it showed an upward trend from 2015 to 2019 (APC=4.82%, 95% CI: 1.8-7.9). Compared with smokers with LC, non-smokers with LC were predominantly females (64.15% vs 27.26%), had a predominantly adenocarcinoma histological subtypes (76.71% vs 42.22%), and had a 20% lower risk of death than smokers (HR=0.80; 95% CI: 0.78-0.81).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proportion of non-smokers with LC was relatively high in northern China, with an increasing trend in the proportion of females and younger age groups. Non-smokers with LC had different epidemiological and clinical characteristics compared with smokers with LC.</p>","PeriodicalId":23202,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Induced Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11382349/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142296213","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Tobacco Induced Diseases
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1