首页 > 最新文献

Tobacco Induced Diseases最新文献

英文 中文
Associations of weight control related behaviors with current cigarette smoking among Chinese adolescents: Results from an ongoing school-based survey in Zhejiang province. 中国青少年体重控制相关行为与当前吸烟的关系:浙江省正在进行的一项校本调查的结果。
IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-09-14 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.18332/tid/192001
Meng Wang, Jue Xu, Haiping Fang, Liping Yang, Tao Yang, Jianqiang Fan, Xiaofu Du, Chunxiao Xu, Yunqi Guan, Jieming Zhong, Min Yu

Introduction: Previous studies have suggested that adolescents may smoke cigarettes to control weight, but relevant research is scarce in Chinese youth. This study was conducted to examine the associations of weight control related behaviors with cigarette smoking in Chinese students.

Methods: This was a secondary analysis of data for 24835 middle and high school students drawn from the 2022 Zhejiang Youth Risk Behavior Survey of China which collected self-reported information of cigarette smoking, weight control strategies and other health-related behaviors. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate the adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the study associations.

Results: Overall, there were 998 (4.02%) current cigarette smokers in this wave of the Zhejiang YRBS (2022). Neither trying to control weight nor healthy weight control behavior of exercising was associated with current cigarette smoking (AOR=1.15; 95% CI: 0.97-1.37 and AOR=1.01; 95% CI: 0.85-1.20, respectively). Meanwhile, unhealthy weight control behaviors of taking laxatives (AOR=1.52; 95% CI: 1.03-2.26), taking diet pills (AOR=1.82; 95% CI: 1.26-2.62), dieting (AOR=1.24; 95% CI: 1.04-1.49), and fasting (AOR=1.81; 95% CI: 1.40-2.34) were significantly associated with increased odds of current cigarette smoking.

Conclusions: Screening and developing interventions for unhealthy weight control behaviors should be considered as part of smoking prevention programs among adolescents.

导言:以往的研究表明,青少年吸烟可能是为了控制体重,但针对中国青少年的相关研究却很少。本研究旨在探讨中国学生控制体重的相关行为与吸烟的关系:本研究对 2022 年中国浙江省青少年危险行为调查中 24835 名初高中学生的数据进行了二次分析,该调查收集了学生关于吸烟、体重控制策略和其他健康相关行为的自我报告信息。研究使用多变量逻辑回归模型估算了研究相关性的调整赔率(AOR)和 95% 的置信区间(CI):在这一波浙江省青年健康状况调查(2022年)中,共有998人(4.02%)目前吸烟。试图控制体重或运动的健康体重控制行为均与当前吸烟无关(AOR=1.15;95% CI:0.97-1.37 和 AOR=1.01;95% CI:0.85-1.20)。同时,服用泻药(AOR=1.52;95% CI:1.03-2.26)、服用减肥药(AOR=1.82;95% CI:1.26-2.62)、节食(AOR=1.24;95% CI:1.04-1.49)和禁食(AOR=1.81;95% CI:1.40-2.34)等不健康的体重控制行为与目前吸烟的几率增加显著相关:结论:在青少年吸烟预防计划中,应考虑对不健康的体重控制行为进行筛查并制定干预措施。
{"title":"Associations of weight control related behaviors with current cigarette smoking among Chinese adolescents: Results from an ongoing school-based survey in Zhejiang province.","authors":"Meng Wang, Jue Xu, Haiping Fang, Liping Yang, Tao Yang, Jianqiang Fan, Xiaofu Du, Chunxiao Xu, Yunqi Guan, Jieming Zhong, Min Yu","doi":"10.18332/tid/192001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/192001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Previous studies have suggested that adolescents may smoke cigarettes to control weight, but relevant research is scarce in Chinese youth. This study was conducted to examine the associations of weight control related behaviors with cigarette smoking in Chinese students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a secondary analysis of data for 24835 middle and high school students drawn from the 2022 Zhejiang Youth Risk Behavior Survey of China which collected self-reported information of cigarette smoking, weight control strategies and other health-related behaviors. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate the adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the study associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, there were 998 (4.02%) current cigarette smokers in this wave of the Zhejiang YRBS (2022). Neither trying to control weight nor healthy weight control behavior of exercising was associated with current cigarette smoking (AOR=1.15; 95% CI: 0.97-1.37 and AOR=1.01; 95% CI: 0.85-1.20, respectively). Meanwhile, unhealthy weight control behaviors of taking laxatives (AOR=1.52; 95% CI: 1.03-2.26), taking diet pills (AOR=1.82; 95% CI: 1.26-2.62), dieting (AOR=1.24; 95% CI: 1.04-1.49), and fasting (AOR=1.81; 95% CI: 1.40-2.34) were significantly associated with increased odds of current cigarette smoking.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Screening and developing interventions for unhealthy weight control behaviors should be considered as part of smoking prevention programs among adolescents.</p>","PeriodicalId":23202,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Induced Diseases","volume":"22 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11401605/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142296211","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An observational study of the marketing practice of e-cigarette specialty stores in two large cities in China: Is there potential to normalize the use of e-cigarettes? 对中国两大城市电子烟专卖店营销行为的观察研究:是否有可能使电子烟的使用正常化?
IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-09-14 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.18332/tid/191840
Hui Deng, Ling Fang, Lingyun Zhang, Sisi Wen, Shuai Zhang, Fan Wang, Pinpin Zheng

Introduction: Supervision measures in China have designated offline retail as the only legal channel for the sale and advertising of e-cigarettes. Specialty stores, exclusively selling vaping devices and e-liquids, are professionally designed to showcase company images and provide the best examples of e-cigarette marketing strategies. The goal was to analyze the retail marketing practice of e-cigarette specialty stores and provide a scientific reference for future e-cigarette point-of-sale regulation.

Methods: On-site observations were conducted in specialty stores among the popular business districts of Chengdu and Shanghai, China, from January to May 2021. 'Dianping', known as 'Chinese Yelp', was used to identify 8 business districts in Shanghai and 5 in Chengdu as observation sites. Two trained observers visited each store in the identified business districts. The data were collected with a checklist, which consisted of 5 sections with 37 items, including basic information, marketing practice, age restriction and health warnings.

Results: In total, 161 e-cigarette specialty stores, including 82 specialty stores in Shanghai and 79 in Chengdu, were identified. Of these stores, 156 were single-brand retailers and 5 were multi-brand retailers. Each store displayed e-cigarette products, which were visible from outside the store. The most common e-cigarette products were rechargeable kits and nicotine-containing e-liquids, which were available at all specialty stores. Frequent forms of promotion were free e-liquid samples (100%) and slogans (57.8%). Signage stating prohibition of minor use and purchase was presented at 141 (87.6%) specialty stores. Relatively few specialty stores (31.7%) displayed health warnings.

Conclusions: E-cigarette specialty stores featured highly visible product displays, varied product selections, abundant marketing materials, free trial services, absent entry restrictions for minors, and a lack of health warnings. Policymakers should move to reduce youth exposure to e-cigarette products and marketing in the retail environment by strengthening regulations on product display and marketing.

导言:中国的监管措施规定,线下零售是电子烟销售和广告的唯一合法渠道。专卖店专门销售电子烟设备和电子烟液,经过专业设计,展示公司形象,是电子烟营销策略的最佳范例。我们的目标是分析电子烟专卖店的零售营销实践,为今后的电子烟销售点监管提供科学参考:方法:2021 年 1 月至 5 月,对中国成都和上海热门商业区的电子烟专卖店进行了现场观察。通过被称为 "中国 Yelp "的 "大众点评",确定了上海的 8 个商圈和成都的 5 个商圈作为观察点。两名训练有素的观察员在确定的商圈内走访了每家商店。数据收集采用核对表的形式,核对表由 5 个部分共 37 个项目组成,包括基本信息、营销行为、年龄限制和健康警示:结果:总共确定了 161 家电子烟专卖店,其中上海 82 家,成都 79 家。其中,156 家为单一品牌零售商,5 家为多品牌零售商。每家专卖店都展示了电子烟产品,这些产品在店外就能看到。最常见的电子烟产品是充电套装和含尼古丁的电子烟液,所有专卖店都有售。最常见的促销方式是免费电子烟样品(100%)和标语(57.8%)。有 141 家(87.6%)专卖店打出了禁止未成年人使用和购买的标语。展示健康警示的专卖店相对较少(31.7%):电子烟专卖店的特点是产品陈列醒目、产品选择多样、营销材料丰富、提供免费试用服务、不限制未成年人进入以及缺乏健康警示。政策制定者应通过加强对产品展示和营销的监管,减少青少年在零售环境中接触电子烟产品和营销的机会。
{"title":"An observational study of the marketing practice of e-cigarette specialty stores in two large cities in China: Is there potential to normalize the use of e-cigarettes?","authors":"Hui Deng, Ling Fang, Lingyun Zhang, Sisi Wen, Shuai Zhang, Fan Wang, Pinpin Zheng","doi":"10.18332/tid/191840","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/191840","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Supervision measures in China have designated offline retail as the only legal channel for the sale and advertising of e-cigarettes. Specialty stores, exclusively selling vaping devices and e-liquids, are professionally designed to showcase company images and provide the best examples of e-cigarette marketing strategies. The goal was to analyze the retail marketing practice of e-cigarette specialty stores and provide a scientific reference for future e-cigarette point-of-sale regulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>On-site observations were conducted in specialty stores among the popular business districts of Chengdu and Shanghai, China, from January to May 2021. 'Dianping', known as 'Chinese Yelp', was used to identify 8 business districts in Shanghai and 5 in Chengdu as observation sites. Two trained observers visited each store in the identified business districts. The data were collected with a checklist, which consisted of 5 sections with 37 items, including basic information, marketing practice, age restriction and health warnings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 161 e-cigarette specialty stores, including 82 specialty stores in Shanghai and 79 in Chengdu, were identified. Of these stores, 156 were single-brand retailers and 5 were multi-brand retailers. Each store displayed e-cigarette products, which were visible from outside the store. The most common e-cigarette products were rechargeable kits and nicotine-containing e-liquids, which were available at all specialty stores. Frequent forms of promotion were free e-liquid samples (100%) and slogans (57.8%). Signage stating prohibition of minor use and purchase was presented at 141 (87.6%) specialty stores. Relatively few specialty stores (31.7%) displayed health warnings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>E-cigarette specialty stores featured highly visible product displays, varied product selections, abundant marketing materials, free trial services, absent entry restrictions for minors, and a lack of health warnings. Policymakers should move to reduce youth exposure to e-cigarette products and marketing in the retail environment by strengthening regulations on product display and marketing.</p>","PeriodicalId":23202,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Induced Diseases","volume":"22 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11401606/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142296210","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Geographical location, cigarette risk perceptions, and current smoking among older US adults. 美国老年人的地理位置、吸烟风险认知和当前吸烟情况。
IF 3.7 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI: 10.18332/tid/191827
Jenny E Ozga,Cassandra A Stanton,James D Sargent,Alexander W Steinberg,Zhiqun Tang,Laura M Paulin
INTRODUCTIONCigarette smoking and smoking-related lung disease are more common in rural (vs urban) areas of the United States (US). This study examined relationships between geographical location, cigarette risk perceptions, and current smoking among older adults who are at greatest risk of developing smoking-related lung disease.METHODSThe study was a secondary data analysis of 12126 respondents aged ≥40 years from Wave 5 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study. Weighted descriptive statistics and Poisson regressions assessed current smoking (vs never or former) as a function of geographical location in a stepwise fashion, first unadjusted, then adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics, and finally for both sociodemographic characteristics and cigarette risk perceptions (4-item scale), in three separate models. Sensitivity analyses examined whether individual risk perceptions items had a greater impact on the association between geographical location and current smoking.RESULTSCurrent smoking was more common among rural (20.6%) than urban (17.6%) residents. The risk ratio (RR) for rural (vs urban) residence on current smoking decreased from 1.17 (95% CI: 1.03-1.32) to 1.14 (95% CI: 1.01-1.29) to 1.08 (95% CI: 0.96-1.21) across the stepwise models. Lower cigarette risk perceptions confounded the rural-current smoking association and was an independent risk factor for smoking (adjusted RR, ARR=2.15; 95% CI: 1.94-2.18). In sensitivity analyses, believing that cigarettes are very or extremely (vs somewhat, slightly, or not at all) harmful to health and agreeing (vs not agreeing) that secondhand smoke causes lung disease in people who do not smoke, confounded the rural-current smoking association whereas beliefs about smoking causing lung cancer or lung disease in people who smoke did not.CONCLUSIONSLower cigarette risk perceptions among rural residents confounded the positive association between rural residence and current smoking. Results from sensitivity analyses highlight potential targets for communication campaigns aimed at promoting more accurate perceptions of the harmful health consequences of cigarette smoking.
简介在美国农村地区(相对于城市地区),吸烟和与吸烟相关的肺部疾病更为常见。本研究探讨了地理位置、卷烟风险认知与最易患吸烟相关肺病的老年人当前吸烟情况之间的关系。方法本研究对烟草与健康人口评估研究第 5 波中年龄≥40 岁的 12126 名受访者进行了二次数据分析。通过加权描述性统计和泊松回归,在三个独立模型中逐步评估了当前吸烟(与从不吸烟或曾经吸烟)与地理位置的关系,首先是未调整,然后是调整社会人口特征,最后是调整社会人口特征和卷烟风险认知(4 项量表)。敏感性分析检验了单个风险认知项目是否对地理位置与当前吸烟之间的关系有更大的影响。结果当前吸烟的农村居民(20.6%)比城市居民(17.6%)更常见。在逐步模型中,农村(与城市)居民与当前吸烟的风险比(RR)从1.17(95% CI:1.03-1.32)降至1.14(95% CI:1.01-1.29),再降至1.08(95% CI:0.96-1.21)。较低的卷烟风险认知混淆了农村与当前吸烟的关系,是吸烟的一个独立风险因素(调整RR,ARR=2.15;95% CI:1.94-2.18)。在敏感性分析中,认为香烟对健康非常有害或极其有害(vs 稍微有害、轻微有害或完全有害)以及同意(vs 不同意)二手烟会导致不吸烟者肺部疾病的观点会混淆农村居民与当前吸烟的关系,而认为吸烟会导致肺癌或吸烟者肺部疾病的观点则不会混淆农村居民与当前吸烟的关系。敏感性分析的结果突出了旨在促进人们更准确地认识吸烟对健康的有害影响的宣传活动的潜在目标。
{"title":"Geographical location, cigarette risk perceptions, and current smoking among older US adults.","authors":"Jenny E Ozga,Cassandra A Stanton,James D Sargent,Alexander W Steinberg,Zhiqun Tang,Laura M Paulin","doi":"10.18332/tid/191827","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/191827","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTIONCigarette smoking and smoking-related lung disease are more common in rural (vs urban) areas of the United States (US). This study examined relationships between geographical location, cigarette risk perceptions, and current smoking among older adults who are at greatest risk of developing smoking-related lung disease.METHODSThe study was a secondary data analysis of 12126 respondents aged ≥40 years from Wave 5 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study. Weighted descriptive statistics and Poisson regressions assessed current smoking (vs never or former) as a function of geographical location in a stepwise fashion, first unadjusted, then adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics, and finally for both sociodemographic characteristics and cigarette risk perceptions (4-item scale), in three separate models. Sensitivity analyses examined whether individual risk perceptions items had a greater impact on the association between geographical location and current smoking.RESULTSCurrent smoking was more common among rural (20.6%) than urban (17.6%) residents. The risk ratio (RR) for rural (vs urban) residence on current smoking decreased from 1.17 (95% CI: 1.03-1.32) to 1.14 (95% CI: 1.01-1.29) to 1.08 (95% CI: 0.96-1.21) across the stepwise models. Lower cigarette risk perceptions confounded the rural-current smoking association and was an independent risk factor for smoking (adjusted RR, ARR=2.15; 95% CI: 1.94-2.18). In sensitivity analyses, believing that cigarettes are very or extremely (vs somewhat, slightly, or not at all) harmful to health and agreeing (vs not agreeing) that secondhand smoke causes lung disease in people who do not smoke, confounded the rural-current smoking association whereas beliefs about smoking causing lung cancer or lung disease in people who smoke did not.CONCLUSIONSLower cigarette risk perceptions among rural residents confounded the positive association between rural residence and current smoking. Results from sensitivity analyses highlight potential targets for communication campaigns aimed at promoting more accurate perceptions of the harmful health consequences of cigarette smoking.","PeriodicalId":23202,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Induced Diseases","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142253348","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
On the extension of the use of a standard operating procedure for nicotine, glycerol and propylene glycol analysis in e-liquids using mass spectrometry. 关于推广使用质谱分析电子液体中尼古丁、甘油和丙二醇的标准操作程序。
IF 3.7 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI: 10.18332/tid/191823
Alessia Turina,Alice Passoni,Silvano Gallus,Alessandra Lugo,Walther Klerx,Reinskje Talhout,Ranti Fayokun,Constantine Vardavas,Enrico Davoli
INTRODUCTIONStandard operating procedures (SOP), accessible to several laboratories, are essential for product verification. EU-JATC (European-Joint Action on Tobacco Control) SOP and the WHO TobLabNet (World Health Organization Tobacco Laboratories Network) SOP (SOP11) are available standard methodologies to measure nicotine, glycerol, and propylene glycol, and propose mass spectrometer (MS) as an alternative method to flame ionization detector (FID). This study conducted a comparison between FID and MS concentration results, following the MS method described in SOP11.METHODSIn May 2020, five test e-liquids in replicates (A-E) were prepared at the Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri and sent, with SOP 11, validation document and results datasheet to 32 different laboratories all over the world from WHO TobLabNet and EU-JATC (18 from JATC, ten from WHO TobLabNet and four academic laboratories). Among thirty-two independent laboratories that participated in the study, results were received from 30 laboratories.RESULTSThe e-liquids analyses, using the two approaches, were compared. Of the 30 laboratories surveyed, 21 utilized the FID approach exclusively, 7 opted for MS detection, and 2 employed both methods. The findings demonstrated that the gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) method offers comparable analytical capabilities regarding accuracy and precision for nicotine, glycerol, and propylene glycol to the FID approach. Through Pearson's correlation test with r≃1 showing a positive correlation between GC-FID and GC-MS data, and the Student's t-test, no significant differences between the two approaches were revealed, showing p>0.005 for almost all three analytes in all samples.CONCLUSIONSThis study indicates that it is possible to apply the available EU-JATC SOP and the WHO TobLabNet SOP11 even in laboratories that do not have access to an FID, for example, to analyze flavors, trace compounds or carcinogenic, mutagenic, or toxic for reproduction (CMR) in electronic cigarette liquids.
引言 标准操作程序(SOP)对产品验证至关重要,多个实验室均可使用。EU-JATC(欧洲烟草控制联合行动)标准操作程序和 WHO TobLabNet(世界卫生组织烟草实验室网络)标准操作程序(SOP11)是测量尼古丁、甘油和丙二醇的可用标准方法,并建议用质谱仪(MS)作为火焰离子化检测器(FID)的替代方法。2020 年 5 月,马里奥-内格里农业科学研究所制备了五种测试电子液体的重复样品(A-E),并连同 SOP 11、验证文件和结果数据表发送给来自世界卫生组织 TobLabNet 和欧盟-JATC 的全球 32 个不同实验室(18 个来自 JATC,10 个来自世界卫生组织 TobLabNet,4 个来自学术实验室)。在参与研究的 32 家独立实验室中,有 30 家实验室提供了结果。在接受调查的 30 家实验室中,21 家实验室完全采用了 FID 方法,7 家实验室选择了 MS 检测方法,2 家实验室同时采用了这两种方法。研究结果表明,气相色谱-质谱(GC-MS)方法在尼古丁、甘油和丙二醇的准确度和精确度方面的分析能力与 FID 方法相当。通过皮尔逊相关性检验(r≃1)和学生 t 检验,GC-FID 和 GC-MS 数据之间呈正相关,两种方法之间无显著差异,所有样品中几乎所有三种分析物的 p 均大于 0.005。结论本研究表明,即使在没有 FID 的实验室,也可以应用现有的 EU-JATC SOP 和 WHO TobLabNet SOP11 分析电子烟液体中的香精、痕量化合物或致癌、致突变或生殖毒性(CMR)。
{"title":"On the extension of the use of a standard operating procedure for nicotine, glycerol and propylene glycol analysis in e-liquids using mass spectrometry.","authors":"Alessia Turina,Alice Passoni,Silvano Gallus,Alessandra Lugo,Walther Klerx,Reinskje Talhout,Ranti Fayokun,Constantine Vardavas,Enrico Davoli","doi":"10.18332/tid/191823","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/191823","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTIONStandard operating procedures (SOP), accessible to several laboratories, are essential for product verification. EU-JATC (European-Joint Action on Tobacco Control) SOP and the WHO TobLabNet (World Health Organization Tobacco Laboratories Network) SOP (SOP11) are available standard methodologies to measure nicotine, glycerol, and propylene glycol, and propose mass spectrometer (MS) as an alternative method to flame ionization detector (FID). This study conducted a comparison between FID and MS concentration results, following the MS method described in SOP11.METHODSIn May 2020, five test e-liquids in replicates (A-E) were prepared at the Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri and sent, with SOP 11, validation document and results datasheet to 32 different laboratories all over the world from WHO TobLabNet and EU-JATC (18 from JATC, ten from WHO TobLabNet and four academic laboratories). Among thirty-two independent laboratories that participated in the study, results were received from 30 laboratories.RESULTSThe e-liquids analyses, using the two approaches, were compared. Of the 30 laboratories surveyed, 21 utilized the FID approach exclusively, 7 opted for MS detection, and 2 employed both methods. The findings demonstrated that the gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) method offers comparable analytical capabilities regarding accuracy and precision for nicotine, glycerol, and propylene glycol to the FID approach. Through Pearson's correlation test with r≃1 showing a positive correlation between GC-FID and GC-MS data, and the Student's t-test, no significant differences between the two approaches were revealed, showing p>0.005 for almost all three analytes in all samples.CONCLUSIONSThis study indicates that it is possible to apply the available EU-JATC SOP and the WHO TobLabNet SOP11 even in laboratories that do not have access to an FID, for example, to analyze flavors, trace compounds or carcinogenic, mutagenic, or toxic for reproduction (CMR) in electronic cigarette liquids.","PeriodicalId":23202,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Induced Diseases","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142186058","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of smoking conventional cigarettes and using heated tobacco products on the olfactory and gustatory function in healthy young adults: A cross-sectional study. 比较吸传统香烟和使用加热烟草制品对健康年轻人嗅觉和味觉功能的影响:横断面研究
IF 3.7 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI: 10.18332/tid/192524
Ella Sever,Daniela Kovačević Pavičić,Aleksandar Pupovac,Ema Saltović,Stjepan Špalj,Irena Glažar
INTRODUCTIONSmoking has a negative impact on the chemosensory function. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of smoking experience and type of tobacco products on gustatory and olfactory function.METHODSThis study included 30 conventional cigarette smokers, 30 heated tobacco products (HTPs) users, and 30 non-smokers. Olfactory function was assessed with a 'Sniffin' Sticks Screening 12 Test' while the taste function was assessed with 'taste strips' for the basic tastes of sweet, sour, salty, and bitter. The lifetime exposure to smoking was calculated using the Brinkman index (BI).RESULTSConventional cigarette smokers demonstrated decreased olfactory function in comparison to non-smokers (median: 10 vs 11; p=0.001) but HTPs users did not differ between those two groups. Overall gustatory function was lower in conventional cigarette smokers (median: 9.5) and HTPs users (median: 10) than in non-smokers (median: 14; p<0.001). A difference was detected in the sour, salty and bitter taste but without significant difference between HTPs users and conventional cigarette smokers. Negative linear correlations were found between the BI and olfactory function, overall gustatory function, sour, salty, and bitter taste (r= -0.317 - -0.585; p≤0.002). In multiple linear regression, BI was the only predictor of olfactory dysfunction when controlling for the effect of tobacco products, age, and gender accounting for 11% of variance (p=0.024, R2=0.123). For gustatory dysfunction, BI was the strongest predictor followed by gender and tobacco products accounting for 11%, 5%, and 4% (p<0.001, R2=0.259).CONCLUSIONSOlfactory and gustatory function are adversely associated with smoking, more depending on BI than tobacco product.
引言吸烟对化学感觉功能有负面影响。本研究的目的是评估吸烟经历和烟草制品类型对味觉和嗅觉功能的影响。方法本研究包括 30 名传统卷烟吸烟者、30 名加热烟草制品(HTPs)使用者和 30 名非吸烟者。嗅觉功能通过 "嗅棒筛查 12 项测试 "进行评估,味觉功能则通过 "味条 "对甜、酸、咸、苦等基本味道进行评估。结果与非吸烟者相比,传统吸烟者的嗅觉功能下降(中位数:10 vs 11;P=0.001),但 HTPs 使用者在这两组人之间没有差异。传统吸烟者(中位数:9.5)和 HTPs 使用者(中位数:10)的总体味觉功能低于非吸烟者(中位数:14;P<0.001)。在酸、咸和苦味方面发现了差异,但 HTPs 使用者与传统吸烟者之间没有显著差异。BI 与嗅觉功能、总体味觉功能、酸味、咸味和苦味之间呈负线性相关(r= -0.317 -0.585; p≤0.002)。在多元线性回归中,当控制了烟草制品、年龄和性别的影响后,BI 是嗅觉功能障碍的唯一预测因子,占方差的 11%(p=0.024,R2=0.123)。结论嗅觉和味觉功能与吸烟有不利关系,更多取决于嗅觉和味觉功能而非烟草制品。
{"title":"Comparison of smoking conventional cigarettes and using heated tobacco products on the olfactory and gustatory function in healthy young adults: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Ella Sever,Daniela Kovačević Pavičić,Aleksandar Pupovac,Ema Saltović,Stjepan Špalj,Irena Glažar","doi":"10.18332/tid/192524","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/192524","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTIONSmoking has a negative impact on the chemosensory function. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of smoking experience and type of tobacco products on gustatory and olfactory function.METHODSThis study included 30 conventional cigarette smokers, 30 heated tobacco products (HTPs) users, and 30 non-smokers. Olfactory function was assessed with a 'Sniffin' Sticks Screening 12 Test' while the taste function was assessed with 'taste strips' for the basic tastes of sweet, sour, salty, and bitter. The lifetime exposure to smoking was calculated using the Brinkman index (BI).RESULTSConventional cigarette smokers demonstrated decreased olfactory function in comparison to non-smokers (median: 10 vs 11; p=0.001) but HTPs users did not differ between those two groups. Overall gustatory function was lower in conventional cigarette smokers (median: 9.5) and HTPs users (median: 10) than in non-smokers (median: 14; p<0.001). A difference was detected in the sour, salty and bitter taste but without significant difference between HTPs users and conventional cigarette smokers. Negative linear correlations were found between the BI and olfactory function, overall gustatory function, sour, salty, and bitter taste (r= -0.317 - -0.585; p≤0.002). In multiple linear regression, BI was the only predictor of olfactory dysfunction when controlling for the effect of tobacco products, age, and gender accounting for 11% of variance (p=0.024, R2=0.123). For gustatory dysfunction, BI was the strongest predictor followed by gender and tobacco products accounting for 11%, 5%, and 4% (p<0.001, R2=0.259).CONCLUSIONSOlfactory and gustatory function are adversely associated with smoking, more depending on BI than tobacco product.","PeriodicalId":23202,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Induced Diseases","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142186059","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative study of lung cancer between smokers and nonsmokers: A real-world study based on the whole population from Tianjin City, China. 吸烟者与非吸烟者肺癌比较研究:基于中国天津市全体人口的真实世界研究。
IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-09-09 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.18332/tid/192191
Wenlong Zheng, Guohong Jiang, Chong Wang, Luning Xun, Chengfeng Shen, Shuang Zhang, Hui Zhang, Qingxin Zhou, Meiqiu Xie, Xiaodan Xue, Dezheng Wang, Jun Lv

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and changing trends of non-smokers with lung cancer (LC) based on data from a population-wide cancer registry in northern China.

Methods: The study used LC incidence and follow-up data from 2010 to 2019 from the Cancer Registry System of Tianjin city, which included 82769 cases. Trends in the incidence and proportion of non-smokers with LC were examined by joinpoint regression analysis. Life table and Cox survival analyses were used to calculate the survival rates and compare the death hazard ratios (HRs) in different groups, respectively.

Results: Among the 82769 new diagnosis cases of LC during 2010 to 2019, there were 34589 (41.8%) current smokers, 14913 (18.0%) ex-smokers, 28123 (34.0%) non-smokers, and 5144 (6.2%) unknowns. The proportion of non-smokers changed slightly from 2010 (35.36%) to 2019 (36.87%) (annual percentage change, APC= -0.01%, p>0.05). This proportion declined in men (2010 vs 2019; 22.06% vs 20.66%) and increased in women (2010 vs 2019; 53.02% vs 62.35%), and in the 0-44 years age group it showed an upward trend from 2015 to 2019 (APC=4.82%, 95% CI: 1.8-7.9). Compared with smokers with LC, non-smokers with LC were predominantly females (64.15% vs 27.26%), had a predominantly adenocarcinoma histological subtypes (76.71% vs 42.22%), and had a 20% lower risk of death than smokers (HR=0.80; 95% CI: 0.78-0.81).

Conclusions: The proportion of non-smokers with LC was relatively high in northern China, with an increasing trend in the proportion of females and younger age groups. Non-smokers with LC had different epidemiological and clinical characteristics compared with smokers with LC.

简介:本研究的目的是根据中国北方人口癌症登记数据,研究非吸烟者肺癌(LC)的患病率、临床特征和变化趋势:本研究的目的是基于中国北方全人群癌症登记数据,研究非吸烟者肺癌(LC)的患病率、临床特征和变化趋势:研究使用了天津市肿瘤登记系统 2010 年至 2019 年的肺癌发病率和随访数据,共纳入 82769 例病例。通过连接点回归分析研究了非吸烟者中 LC 发病率和比例的变化趋势。采用生命表和Cox生存分析法分别计算不同组别的生存率和比较死亡危险比(HRs):在2010年至2019年期间新诊断的82769例LC病例中,有34589人(41.8%)为现吸烟者,14913人(18.0%)为戒烟者,28123人(34.0%)为非吸烟者,5144人(6.2%)为未知者。非吸烟者的比例从 2010 年(35.36%)到 2019 年(36.87%)略有变化(年度百分比变化,APC=-0.01%,P>0.05)。该比例在男性中有所下降(2010 vs 2019; 22.06% vs 20.66%),在女性中有所上升(2010 vs 2019; 53.02% vs 62.35%),在 0-44 岁年龄组中,该比例从 2015 年到 2019 年呈上升趋势(APC=4.82%,95% CI:1.8-7.9)。与患有肺癌的吸烟者相比,患有肺癌的非吸烟者以女性为主(64.15% vs 27.26%),组织学亚型以腺癌为主(76.71% vs 42.22%),死亡风险比吸烟者低20%(HR=0.80;95% CI:0.78-0.81):在中国北方,非吸烟者中患 LC 的比例相对较高,女性和年轻群体的比例呈上升趋势。与吸烟者相比,非吸烟者 LC 患者具有不同的流行病学和临床特征。
{"title":"Comparative study of lung cancer between smokers and nonsmokers: A real-world study based on the whole population from Tianjin City, China.","authors":"Wenlong Zheng, Guohong Jiang, Chong Wang, Luning Xun, Chengfeng Shen, Shuang Zhang, Hui Zhang, Qingxin Zhou, Meiqiu Xie, Xiaodan Xue, Dezheng Wang, Jun Lv","doi":"10.18332/tid/192191","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/192191","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and changing trends of non-smokers with lung cancer (LC) based on data from a population-wide cancer registry in northern China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study used LC incidence and follow-up data from 2010 to 2019 from the Cancer Registry System of Tianjin city, which included 82769 cases. Trends in the incidence and proportion of non-smokers with LC were examined by joinpoint regression analysis. Life table and Cox survival analyses were used to calculate the survival rates and compare the death hazard ratios (HRs) in different groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 82769 new diagnosis cases of LC during 2010 to 2019, there were 34589 (41.8%) current smokers, 14913 (18.0%) ex-smokers, 28123 (34.0%) non-smokers, and 5144 (6.2%) unknowns. The proportion of non-smokers changed slightly from 2010 (35.36%) to 2019 (36.87%) (annual percentage change, APC= -0.01%, p>0.05). This proportion declined in men (2010 vs 2019; 22.06% vs 20.66%) and increased in women (2010 vs 2019; 53.02% vs 62.35%), and in the 0-44 years age group it showed an upward trend from 2015 to 2019 (APC=4.82%, 95% CI: 1.8-7.9). Compared with smokers with LC, non-smokers with LC were predominantly females (64.15% vs 27.26%), had a predominantly adenocarcinoma histological subtypes (76.71% vs 42.22%), and had a 20% lower risk of death than smokers (HR=0.80; 95% CI: 0.78-0.81).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proportion of non-smokers with LC was relatively high in northern China, with an increasing trend in the proportion of females and younger age groups. Non-smokers with LC had different epidemiological and clinical characteristics compared with smokers with LC.</p>","PeriodicalId":23202,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Induced Diseases","volume":"22 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11382349/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142296213","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Awareness and use of nicotine pouches in a nationwide sample of adults in Poland. 波兰全国成年人对尼古丁袋的认识和使用情况。
IF 3.7 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI: 10.18332/tid/192522
Mateusz Jankowski,Vaughan W Rees
INTRODUCTIONNicotine pouches are a new type of nicotine-containing product that have been marketed in many countries worldwide, generating growing acceptance among consumers. The aim of this study was to assess factors associated with public awareness and use of nicotine pouches among adults in Poland.METHODSA cross-sectional survey was conducted with a nationally representative sample of 1080 adults in Poland (February 2024). Awareness of nicotine pouches, history of use, current (past 30-day) use of nicotine pouches, as well as perception of harm was assessed using a purpose-designed questionnaire.RESULTSAwareness of nicotine pouches was reported by 24% of the sample, while 9.2% reported ever having used a nicotine pouch product, and 4.3% using a nicotine pouch in the past 30 days. Among all respondents, 60.7% perceived nicotine pouches as harmful as combustible cigarettes, 28.2% perceived nicotine pouches as less harmful, and 11% as more harmful than combustible cigarettes. In multivariable logistic regression model, women (adjusted odds ratio, AOR=1.40; 95% CI: 1.03-1.91; p<0.05), individuals aged <60 years (p<0.05), current tobacco smokers (AOR=2.59; 95% CI: 1.75-3.82; p<0.001), former tobacco smokers (AOR=1.53; 95% CI: 1.01-2.32; p<0.05) and ever users of e-cigarette or heated tobacco (AOR=2.90; 95% CI: 2.07-4.05; p<0.001) were more likely to declare that had ever heard of nicotine pouches. Moreover, individuals aged <60 years (p<0.05), occupationally active individuals (AOR=1.82; 95% CI: 1.01-3.31; p<0.05), current tobacco smokers (AOR=2.71; 95% CI: 1.48-4.97; p<0.01), and ever users of e-cigarette or heated tobacco (AOR=5.29; 95% CI: 2.96-9.44; p<0.001) were more likely to declare ever use of nicotine pouches.CONCLUSIONSThis study provides the first national data on public awareness and use (ever and current) of nicotine pouches in Poland. Young adults, current smokers, and ever e-cigarette and heated tobacco users are at higher risk of ever use of nicotine pouches, so policy interventions are needed to protect young people from nicotine pouch marketing and nicotine initiation.
导言尼古丁袋是一种新型的含尼古丁产品,已在全球许多国家上市,越来越多的消费者开始接受这种产品。本研究旨在评估与波兰成年人对尼古丁烟嘴的公众认知和使用相关的因素。结果24%的样本表示了解尼古丁袋,9.2%的样本表示曾经使用过尼古丁袋产品,4.3%的样本表示在过去30天内使用过尼古丁袋。在所有受访者中,60.7%认为尼古丁袋与可燃卷烟一样有害,28.2%认为尼古丁袋危害较小,11%认为尼古丁袋比可燃卷烟危害更大。在多变量逻辑回归模型中,女性(调整后的几率比,AOR=1.40;95% CI:1.03-1.91;p<0.05)、年龄小于 60 岁者(p<0.05)、目前吸烟者(AOR=2.59;95% CI:1.75-3.82;p<0.001)、曾经吸烟者(AOR=1.53;95% CI:1.01-2.32;p<0.05)和曾经使用电子烟或加热烟草者(AOR=2.90;95% CI:2.07-4.05;p<0.001)更有可能声称听说过尼古丁袋。此外,年龄小于 60 岁(p<0.05)、职业活跃者(AOR=1.82;95% CI:1.01-3.31;p<0.05)、目前吸烟者(AOR=2.71;95% CI:1.48-4.97;p<0.01)、曾经使用电子烟或加热烟草者(AOR=5.结论本研究首次提供了波兰公众对尼古丁袋的认知和使用(曾经使用和目前使用)的全国性数据。年轻成年人、当前吸烟者、电子烟和加热烟草使用者曾经使用尼古丁袋的风险较高,因此需要采取政策干预措施,保护年轻人免受尼古丁袋营销和尼古丁启蒙的影响。
{"title":"Awareness and use of nicotine pouches in a nationwide sample of adults in Poland.","authors":"Mateusz Jankowski,Vaughan W Rees","doi":"10.18332/tid/192522","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/192522","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTIONNicotine pouches are a new type of nicotine-containing product that have been marketed in many countries worldwide, generating growing acceptance among consumers. The aim of this study was to assess factors associated with public awareness and use of nicotine pouches among adults in Poland.METHODSA cross-sectional survey was conducted with a nationally representative sample of 1080 adults in Poland (February 2024). Awareness of nicotine pouches, history of use, current (past 30-day) use of nicotine pouches, as well as perception of harm was assessed using a purpose-designed questionnaire.RESULTSAwareness of nicotine pouches was reported by 24% of the sample, while 9.2% reported ever having used a nicotine pouch product, and 4.3% using a nicotine pouch in the past 30 days. Among all respondents, 60.7% perceived nicotine pouches as harmful as combustible cigarettes, 28.2% perceived nicotine pouches as less harmful, and 11% as more harmful than combustible cigarettes. In multivariable logistic regression model, women (adjusted odds ratio, AOR=1.40; 95% CI: 1.03-1.91; p<0.05), individuals aged <60 years (p<0.05), current tobacco smokers (AOR=2.59; 95% CI: 1.75-3.82; p<0.001), former tobacco smokers (AOR=1.53; 95% CI: 1.01-2.32; p<0.05) and ever users of e-cigarette or heated tobacco (AOR=2.90; 95% CI: 2.07-4.05; p<0.001) were more likely to declare that had ever heard of nicotine pouches. Moreover, individuals aged <60 years (p<0.05), occupationally active individuals (AOR=1.82; 95% CI: 1.01-3.31; p<0.05), current tobacco smokers (AOR=2.71; 95% CI: 1.48-4.97; p<0.01), and ever users of e-cigarette or heated tobacco (AOR=5.29; 95% CI: 2.96-9.44; p<0.001) were more likely to declare ever use of nicotine pouches.CONCLUSIONSThis study provides the first national data on public awareness and use (ever and current) of nicotine pouches in Poland. Young adults, current smokers, and ever e-cigarette and heated tobacco users are at higher risk of ever use of nicotine pouches, so policy interventions are needed to protect young people from nicotine pouch marketing and nicotine initiation.","PeriodicalId":23202,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Induced Diseases","volume":"55 6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142224353","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
E-cigarette use and associated factors among adults aged 18-44 years in China: Findings from an online survey. 中国 18-44 岁成年人的电子烟使用情况及相关因素:在线调查的结果。
IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-09-07 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.18332/tid/191994
Xiaochen Yang, Xiaoyue Zhang, Lanchao Zhang, Wangnan Cao, Chengqian Zhang, Xiangsu Wang, Shiyuan Wang, Chun Chang

Introduction: There needs to be more up-to-date evidence on the prevalence of e-cigarette use among Chinese adults. This study aims to investigate the prevalence and associated factors of e-cigarette use among adults aged 18-44 years in China.

Methods: Cross-sectional design and convenience sampling were used. The data for this study were obtained from an online survey conducted in mainland China from April to May 2023. The target population was adults aged 18-44 years. Descriptive analysis was employed to report the prevalence of e-cigarette use, while adjusted multivariable logistic regression was performed to examine the association between e-cigarette use and related factors.

Results: A total of 4256 participants were included in this study; 12.9% were current e-cigarette users, 5.9% were frequent users, and 7.0% were occasional users. The descriptive analysis results indicated that males and cigarette users had a higher prevalence of e-cigarette use. Multivariable analysis showed that e-cigarette use was significantly associated with female gender (AOR=0.76, 95% CI: 0.60-0.96), those aged 25-34 years with monthly income 6000-8999 CNY (AOR=2.01; 95% CI: 1.18-3.41), those aged 25-34 years with monthly income ≥9000 CNY (AOR=2.20; 95% CI: 1.26-3.82), college or undergraduate degree (AOR=1.91; 95% CI: 1.22-3.00), urban residence (AOR=1.72; 95% CI: 1.34-2.20), being a current smoker (AOR=3.32; 95% CI: 2.64-4.16), perception of harm (AOR=0.66; 95% CI: 0.60-0.73), and perception of benefit (AOR=2.31; 95% CI: 2.04-2.61).

Conclusions: The prevalence of current e-cigarette use among adults in China was 12.9% within our sample. In addition to sociodemographic factors, individuals with a higher perception of the harm associated with e-cigarettes were less likely to engage in e-cigarette consumption. Conversely, individuals who perceive the 'benefits' of e-cigarettes more favorably use them. Targeted interventions, such as health education, are recommended to help adults develop a correct understanding of e-cigarettes and lower the prevalence of e-cigarette use.

导言:关于电子烟在中国成年人中的使用率,需要更多的最新证据。本研究旨在调查中国 18-44 岁成年人使用电子烟的流行率和相关因素:方法:采用横断面设计和便利抽样。研究数据来自 2023 年 4 月至 5 月在中国大陆进行的在线调查。目标人群为 18-44 岁的成年人。研究采用了描述性分析来报告电子烟的使用率,同时进行了调整后的多变量逻辑回归来研究电子烟使用与相关因素之间的关系:本研究共纳入了 4256 名参与者,其中 12.9% 是电子烟的经常使用者,5.9% 是频繁使用者,7.0% 是偶尔使用者。描述性分析结果表明,男性和吸烟者使用电子烟的比例较高。多变量分析表明,电子烟的使用与女性性别(AOR=0.76,95% CI:0.60-0.96)、月收入 6000-8999 元的 25-34 岁人群(AOR=2.01;95% CI:1.18-3.41)、月收入≥9000 元的 25-34 岁人群(AOR=2.20;95% CI:1.26-3.82)、大专或本科学历(AOR=1.91;95% CI:1.22-3.00)、城市居民(AOR=1.72;95% CI:1.34-2.20)、目前吸烟(AOR=3.32;95% CI:2.64-4.16)、危害感(AOR=0.66;95% CI:0.60-0.73)和获益感(AOR=2.31;95% CI:2.04-2.61):在我们的样本中,中国成年人当前使用电子烟的流行率为12.9%。除社会人口学因素外,对电子烟相关危害认知较高的人较少吸食电子烟。相反,认为电子烟有 "益处 "的人则更倾向于使用电子烟。建议采取健康教育等有针对性的干预措施,帮助成年人正确认识电子烟,降低电子烟的使用率。
{"title":"E-cigarette use and associated factors among adults aged 18-44 years in China: Findings from an online survey.","authors":"Xiaochen Yang, Xiaoyue Zhang, Lanchao Zhang, Wangnan Cao, Chengqian Zhang, Xiangsu Wang, Shiyuan Wang, Chun Chang","doi":"10.18332/tid/191994","DOIUrl":"10.18332/tid/191994","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There needs to be more up-to-date evidence on the prevalence of e-cigarette use among Chinese adults. This study aims to investigate the prevalence and associated factors of e-cigarette use among adults aged 18-44 years in China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional design and convenience sampling were used. The data for this study were obtained from an online survey conducted in mainland China from April to May 2023. The target population was adults aged 18-44 years. Descriptive analysis was employed to report the prevalence of e-cigarette use, while adjusted multivariable logistic regression was performed to examine the association between e-cigarette use and related factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4256 participants were included in this study; 12.9% were current e-cigarette users, 5.9% were frequent users, and 7.0% were occasional users. The descriptive analysis results indicated that males and cigarette users had a higher prevalence of e-cigarette use. Multivariable analysis showed that e-cigarette use was significantly associated with female gender (AOR=0.76, 95% CI: 0.60-0.96), those aged 25-34 years with monthly income 6000-8999 CNY (AOR=2.01; 95% CI: 1.18-3.41), those aged 25-34 years with monthly income ≥9000 CNY (AOR=2.20; 95% CI: 1.26-3.82), college or undergraduate degree (AOR=1.91; 95% CI: 1.22-3.00), urban residence (AOR=1.72; 95% CI: 1.34-2.20), being a current smoker (AOR=3.32; 95% CI: 2.64-4.16), perception of harm (AOR=0.66; 95% CI: 0.60-0.73), and perception of benefit (AOR=2.31; 95% CI: 2.04-2.61).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The prevalence of current e-cigarette use among adults in China was 12.9% within our sample. In addition to sociodemographic factors, individuals with a higher perception of the harm associated with e-cigarettes were less likely to engage in e-cigarette consumption. Conversely, individuals who perceive the 'benefits' of e-cigarettes more favorably use them. Targeted interventions, such as health education, are recommended to help adults develop a correct understanding of e-cigarettes and lower the prevalence of e-cigarette use.</p>","PeriodicalId":23202,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Induced Diseases","volume":"22 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11380161/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142155035","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Outdoor secondhand smoke exposure in public places frequented by minors in the urban area of Hangzhou City, China: A cross-sectional study. 中国杭州市城区未成年人经常出入的公共场所的户外二手烟暴露情况:一项横断面研究。
IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-09-05 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.18332/tid/192129
Yuhuan Sun, Dahui Wang, Yang Yi, Hongkun Chen, Yuchen Zhou, Geyao Huang, Falin Zhao

Introduction: Hangzhou Public Places Smoking Control Regulations (2019) have been gradually adopted, which explicitly stipulate that smoking is strictly prohibited in the outdoor areas of educational and healthcare institutions for minors. However, there are few studies reporting the exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) in outdoor public places for minors in the urban area of Hangzhou City.

Methods: We aimed to assess the exposure to SHS in public spaces frequented by minors using on-site observations and questionnaires. In this cross-sectional study, the area was divided into core and non-core areas based on the spatial distribution and development process of the city. The core areas included the West Lake commercial district, extending to the Qiantang River, while non-core areas were located beyond this radius. Using stratified random sampling, 30 public places in each area were selected as observation sites. On-site observations measured SHS exposure and smoking control, and questionnaires were administered to 6 individuals at each site. The results were compared between the two investigation methods.

Results: Among the 57 valid observation points, 24.6% (14/57) did not display any no-smoking signs. Outdoor SHS exposure rate from on-site observation P1 (observing someone smoking or smelling tobacco smoke), on-site observation P2 (observing someone smoking or smelling tobacco smoke or seeing cigarette butts) and questionnaire survey P3, were 59.6% (95% CI: 45.7-72.2), 91.1% (95% CI: 79.7-96.7) and 41.0% (95% CI: 35.5-46.7), respectively.

Conclusions: The outdoor SHS exposure in areas frequented by minors in the urban district of Hangzhou City remains high, coupled with a lack of awareness of SHS risks among underage individuals. Therefore, controlling outdoor SHS exposure in these key areas is a critical public health issue in Hangzhou, requiring further tobacco control efforts. On-site observation is an important and supplementary research method to investigate outdoor SHS exposure, especially to describe the SHS exposure of focus areas.

导读:《杭州市公共场所控制吸烟条例(2019年版)》已逐步通过:杭州市公共场所控制吸烟条例(2019年)》已逐步获得通过,其中明确规定教育和医疗卫生机构的室外区域严禁未成年人吸烟。然而,很少有研究报道杭州市城区未成年人在室外公共场所的二手烟(SHS)暴露情况:方法:我们采用现场观察和问卷调查的方法,评估未成年人经常出入的公共场所的二手烟暴露情况。在这项横断面研究中,根据城市的空间分布和发展进程,我们将研究区域划分为核心区和非核心区。核心区域包括西湖商业区,一直延伸到钱塘江,而非核心区域则位于此半径范围之外。通过分层随机抽样,在每个区域选择了 30 个公共场所作为观测点。现场观察测量 SHS 暴露和控烟情况,并在每个地点对 6 个人进行问卷调查。两种调查方法的结果进行了比较:结果:在 57 个有效观察点中,24.6%(14/57)没有显示任何禁烟标志。现场观察 P1(观察到有人吸烟或闻到烟草烟雾)、现场观察 P2(观察到有人吸烟或闻到烟草烟雾或看到烟头)和问卷调查 P3 的室外 SHS 暴露率分别为 59.6% (95% CI: 45.7-72.2)、91.1% (95% CI: 79.7-96.7) 和 41.0% (95% CI: 35.5-46.7):结论:在杭州市区未成年人经常出现的区域,室外可吸入颗粒物(SHS)暴露量居高不下,而且未成年人对SHS风险缺乏认识。因此,控制这些重点区域的室外 SHS 暴露是杭州市一个重要的公共卫生问题,需要进一步开展控烟工作。现场观察是调查室外 SHS 暴露,尤其是描述重点区域 SHS 暴露的重要补充研究方法。
{"title":"Outdoor secondhand smoke exposure in public places frequented by minors in the urban area of Hangzhou City, China: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Yuhuan Sun, Dahui Wang, Yang Yi, Hongkun Chen, Yuchen Zhou, Geyao Huang, Falin Zhao","doi":"10.18332/tid/192129","DOIUrl":"10.18332/tid/192129","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hangzhou Public Places Smoking Control Regulations (2019) have been gradually adopted, which explicitly stipulate that smoking is strictly prohibited in the outdoor areas of educational and healthcare institutions for minors. However, there are few studies reporting the exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) in outdoor public places for minors in the urban area of Hangzhou City.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We aimed to assess the exposure to SHS in public spaces frequented by minors using on-site observations and questionnaires. In this cross-sectional study, the area was divided into core and non-core areas based on the spatial distribution and development process of the city. The core areas included the West Lake commercial district, extending to the Qiantang River, while non-core areas were located beyond this radius. Using stratified random sampling, 30 public places in each area were selected as observation sites. On-site observations measured SHS exposure and smoking control, and questionnaires were administered to 6 individuals at each site. The results were compared between the two investigation methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 57 valid observation points, 24.6% (14/57) did not display any no-smoking signs. Outdoor SHS exposure rate from on-site observation P1 (observing someone smoking or smelling tobacco smoke), on-site observation P2 (observing someone smoking or smelling tobacco smoke or seeing cigarette butts) and questionnaire survey P3, were 59.6% (95% CI: 45.7-72.2), 91.1% (95% CI: 79.7-96.7) and 41.0% (95% CI: 35.5-46.7), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The outdoor SHS exposure in areas frequented by minors in the urban district of Hangzhou City remains high, coupled with a lack of awareness of SHS risks among underage individuals. Therefore, controlling outdoor SHS exposure in these key areas is a critical public health issue in Hangzhou, requiring further tobacco control efforts. On-site observation is an important and supplementary research method to investigate outdoor SHS exposure, especially to describe the SHS exposure of focus areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":23202,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Induced Diseases","volume":"22 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11375629/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142141197","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sociodemographic inequalities in cigarette, smokeless tobacco, waterpipe tobacco, and electronic cigarette use among adolescents aged 12-16 years in 114 countries: A cross-sectional analysis. 114 个国家 12-16 岁青少年使用香烟、无烟烟草、水烟和电子烟的社会人口不平等现象:横断面分析。
IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-09-02 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.18332/tid/191824
Mohammed Jawad, Wei Li, Filippos T Filippidis

Introduction: The majority of users of tobacco and nicotine products start using them in adolescence. In order to keep equity considerations at the forefront of tobacco control, it is crucial to assess whether inequalities in prevalence of tobacco and nicotine use exist among adolescents globally.

Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of Global Youth Tobacco Survey (GYTS) data from 538644 school-based adolescents (79.3% aged 13-15 years) in 114 countries (2013-2019). Data were collected on current (past 30-day) use of cigarettes, smokeless tobacco, waterpipe tobacco and electronic cigarettes. We used weighted Poisson regression models adjusted for sex, pocket money, and age to assess differences in prevalence of current use between boys and girls, and between students with high versus low pocket money.

Results: Although there was substantial regional variation, in most countries boys were statistically significantly more likely to report current use of all assessed products (ranging from 50.0% of countries for waterpipe tobacco to 73.3% of countries for electronic cigarettes). Inequalities by sex were less pronounced in Europe compared to other regions. Inequalities by pocket money were less consistent; students with more pocket money were more likely to report current use of cigarettes (vs those with less pocket money) in 61.8% of the countries, but more likely to report current use of smokeless tobacco in only 18.3% of countries.

Conclusions: Globally, boys and adolescents with more pocket money are generally more likely to use a range of tobacco and nicotine products. However, these patterns are not universal and local variations should be taken into consideration to design effective and equitable tobacco control policies.

简介大多数烟草和尼古丁产品使用者都是从青少年时期开始使用的。为了将公平因素放在烟草控制的首位,评估全球青少年烟草和尼古丁使用率是否存在不平等至关重要:我们对全球青少年烟草调查(GYTS)数据进行了二次分析,这些数据来自 114 个国家的 538644 名在校青少年(79.3% 年龄在 13-15 岁之间)(2013-2019 年)。调查收集了当前(过去 30 天)使用香烟、无烟烟草、水烟和电子烟的数据。我们使用调整了性别、零花钱和年龄的加权泊松回归模型来评估男生和女生之间以及零花钱多和零花钱少的学生之间当前使用率的差异:尽管地区间差异很大,但在大多数国家,从统计学角度看,男生更有可能报告目前使用所有评估产品(从50.0%的国家使用水烟到73.3%的国家使用电子烟)。与其他地区相比,欧洲的性别不平等现象并不明显。在61.8%的国家中,拥有较多零花钱的学生更有可能报告目前使用香烟(与拥有较少零花钱的学生相比),但只有18.3%的国家中,拥有较多零花钱的学生更有可能报告目前使用无烟烟草:在全球范围内,零花钱较多的男孩和青少年一般更有可能使用各种烟草和尼古丁产品。然而,这些模式并不具有普遍性,在制定有效、公平的烟草控制政策时应考虑当地的差异。
{"title":"Sociodemographic inequalities in cigarette, smokeless tobacco, waterpipe tobacco, and electronic cigarette use among adolescents aged 12-16 years in 114 countries: A cross-sectional analysis.","authors":"Mohammed Jawad, Wei Li, Filippos T Filippidis","doi":"10.18332/tid/191824","DOIUrl":"10.18332/tid/191824","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The majority of users of tobacco and nicotine products start using them in adolescence. In order to keep equity considerations at the forefront of tobacco control, it is crucial to assess whether inequalities in prevalence of tobacco and nicotine use exist among adolescents globally.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a secondary analysis of Global Youth Tobacco Survey (GYTS) data from 538644 school-based adolescents (79.3% aged 13-15 years) in 114 countries (2013-2019). Data were collected on current (past 30-day) use of cigarettes, smokeless tobacco, waterpipe tobacco and electronic cigarettes. We used weighted Poisson regression models adjusted for sex, pocket money, and age to assess differences in prevalence of current use between boys and girls, and between students with high versus low pocket money.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although there was substantial regional variation, in most countries boys were statistically significantly more likely to report current use of all assessed products (ranging from 50.0% of countries for waterpipe tobacco to 73.3% of countries for electronic cigarettes). Inequalities by sex were less pronounced in Europe compared to other regions. Inequalities by pocket money were less consistent; students with more pocket money were more likely to report current use of cigarettes (vs those with less pocket money) in 61.8% of the countries, but more likely to report current use of smokeless tobacco in only 18.3% of countries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Globally, boys and adolescents with more pocket money are generally more likely to use a range of tobacco and nicotine products. However, these patterns are not universal and local variations should be taken into consideration to design effective and equitable tobacco control policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23202,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Induced Diseases","volume":"22 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11367622/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142120691","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Tobacco Induced Diseases
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1