Pub Date : 2022-11-16DOI: 10.14712/24646830.2021.21
Petr Eliáš
The article analyses two Czech translations of T. S. Eliot’s The Waste Land, both by members of the Group 42. Jiřina Hauková and Jindřich Chalupecký were the first to translate a complete text, including author’s notes. Jiří Kolář and Jiří Kotalík translated the fifth part of the poem. After a brief introduction describing the genesis of the original text and listing the existing Czech translations, the article analyses both translations separately, as well as in comparison, considering all the relevant criteria. Through a detailed analysis of the poetic devices used by Eliot and his translators, the article delivers a complex description of the methods used by respective translators showing that Hauková and Chalupecký emphasize meaning to the detriment of sound, the translation lacking rhythm and rhymes. The version by Kolář and Kotalík is much more condensed, rhythmical, and more accomplished.
{"title":"Pustá země T. S. Eliota ve dvou českých překladech","authors":"Petr Eliáš","doi":"10.14712/24646830.2021.21","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14712/24646830.2021.21","url":null,"abstract":"The article analyses two Czech translations of T. S. Eliot’s The Waste Land, both by members of the Group 42. Jiřina Hauková and Jindřich Chalupecký were the first to translate a complete text, including author’s notes. Jiří Kolář and Jiří Kotalík translated the fifth part of the poem. After a brief introduction describing the genesis of the original text and listing the existing Czech translations, the article analyses both translations separately, as well as in comparison, considering all the relevant criteria. Through a detailed analysis of the poetic devices used by Eliot and his translators, the article delivers a complex description of the methods used by respective translators showing that Hauková and Chalupecký emphasize meaning to the detriment of sound, the translation lacking rhythm and rhymes. The version by Kolář and Kotalík is much more condensed, rhythmical, and more accomplished.","PeriodicalId":234203,"journal":{"name":"AUC PHILOLOGICA","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126832031","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-11-16DOI: 10.14712/24646830.2021.29
Miroslava Melicherčíková
The current emergency caused by the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has necessitated distance interpreting training. This paper presents data collected from two online questionnaires distributed among students of translation and interpreting at the Department of English and American Studies, Faculty of Arts at Matej Bel University in Banská Bystrica, Slovakia. The first online questionnaire (May–June 2020) was filled in by 26 respondents who completed 10 weeks of distance interpreting training in the summer semester of the 2019/2020 academic year. The second, identically structured, online questionnaire (December 2020–January 2021) was filled in by 36 respondents who completed distance interpreting training (10 weeks) at the same department in the winter semester of the 2020/2021 academic year. The paper also presents data on three interpreting teachers, which come from an e-mail survey and map the level of their ability to work with technology, their time availability, experience with online interpreting, or changes in approach and methods during distance interpreting training. The paper focuses on several aspects of distance interpreting training from students’ point of view, such as the form of interpreting training; frequency and regularity of tasks; time preparation; form, frequency, and contribution of the feedback; ideal training model; pros and cons of distance vs. traditional training; recommendations for its improvement. It tries to determine whether distance interpreting training can compete with traditional training from students’ point of view. Based on the questionnaire findings, recommendations for streamlining such training in the future are presented.
{"title":"Dištančná výučba tlumočníckych predmetov počas dvoch semestrov z pohľadu študentov","authors":"Miroslava Melicherčíková","doi":"10.14712/24646830.2021.29","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14712/24646830.2021.29","url":null,"abstract":"The current emergency caused by the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has necessitated distance interpreting training. This paper presents data collected from two online questionnaires distributed among students of translation and interpreting at the Department of English and American Studies, Faculty of Arts at Matej Bel University in Banská Bystrica, Slovakia. The first online questionnaire (May–June 2020) was filled in by 26 respondents who completed 10 weeks of distance interpreting training in the summer semester of the 2019/2020 academic year. The second, identically structured, online questionnaire (December 2020–January 2021) was filled in by 36 respondents who completed distance interpreting training (10 weeks) at the same department in the winter semester of the 2020/2021 academic year. The paper also presents data on three interpreting teachers, which come from an e-mail survey and map the level of their ability to work with technology, their time availability, experience with online interpreting, or changes in approach and methods during distance interpreting training. The paper focuses on several aspects of distance interpreting training from students’ point of view, such as the form of interpreting training; frequency and regularity of tasks; time preparation; form, frequency, and contribution of the feedback; ideal training model; pros and cons of distance vs. traditional training; recommendations for its improvement. It tries to determine whether distance interpreting training can compete with traditional training from students’ point of view. Based on the questionnaire findings, recommendations for streamlining such training in the future are presented.","PeriodicalId":234203,"journal":{"name":"AUC PHILOLOGICA","volume":"151 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127287862","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-11-16DOI: 10.14712/24646830.2021.22
Zuzana Šťastná
The contrastive analysis of two modern Czech translations of John Keats’s The Eve of St. Agnes by Jiřina Hauková (1961) and Hana Žantovská (1977) shows differences on three levels: the translators’ refashioning of the Spenserian stanza, different preferences in rendering Keats’s imagery, and different levels of deliberate archaizing in lexical choices and syntax, especially in direct speeches. Žantovská’s version is more euphonious with a higher percentage of full rhymes and, with a rhyming scheme of ababcdcdd and a final alexandrine line, keeps closer to the original rhythmical and rhyming pattern. It also keeps closer to the original in preserving the highly stylized nature of most direct speeches in the poem. Hauková’s earlier version relies more on imperfect rhyming or assonance and departs more radically from the Spenserian scheme, with a rhyming pattern of ababcdcdc, and a frequent lack of a clear caesura in the last line. It also tends to make the direct speeches less ornate and, even outside direct a dress, resorts less frequently to highly formal, poeticized or archaic lexical choices or syntax. Žantovská’s rendering of Keats’s imagery shows preference for precision and logical consistency while the poetic effects in Hauková’s version depend more often on combining seemingly disparate images and notions.
{"title":"The Eve of St. Agnes ve dvou novějších českých překladech","authors":"Zuzana Šťastná","doi":"10.14712/24646830.2021.22","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14712/24646830.2021.22","url":null,"abstract":"The contrastive analysis of two modern Czech translations of John Keats’s The Eve of St. Agnes by Jiřina Hauková (1961) and Hana Žantovská (1977) shows differences on three levels: the translators’ refashioning of the Spenserian stanza, different preferences in rendering Keats’s imagery, and different levels of deliberate archaizing in lexical choices and syntax, especially in direct speeches. Žantovská’s version is more euphonious with a higher percentage of full rhymes and, with a rhyming scheme of ababcdcdd and a final alexandrine line, keeps closer to the original rhythmical and rhyming pattern. It also keeps closer to the original in preserving the highly stylized nature of most direct speeches in the poem. Hauková’s earlier version relies more on imperfect rhyming or assonance and departs more radically from the Spenserian scheme, with a rhyming pattern of ababcdcdc, and a frequent lack of a clear caesura in the last line. It also tends to make the direct speeches less ornate and, even outside direct a dress, resorts less frequently to highly formal, poeticized or archaic lexical choices or syntax. Žantovská’s rendering of Keats’s imagery shows preference for precision and logical consistency while the poetic effects in Hauková’s version depend more often on combining seemingly disparate images and notions.","PeriodicalId":234203,"journal":{"name":"AUC PHILOLOGICA","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121863581","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-11-16DOI: 10.14712/24646830.2021.26
Ivana Čeňková
Everyone is talking about artificial intelligence today, and it is a topic that hits the headlines. International research and projects include it in their terms of reference in the hunt for subsidies. It is well established in numerous industrial sectors and is presented as an integral part of new technologies. In short, it enters all areas of human activity and is becoming an unavoidable and omnipresent subject in 21st century society, and in the everyday lives of all of us. But do we really know what it means – or will mean – for us, and notably for interpreters? Will it influence or change interpreter training and the whole profession? If so, how? The author will be taking a layman’s view of this subject and put these questions (among many others) to students and interpreter trainers at the Institute of Translation Studies, Charles University and to Czech interpreters on the local and European market to see what they think, what they know, and how they view the future. After going through and analysing all the 77 answers from the sample, the author presents the results of this survey and will attempt to draw conclusions which will be preliminary, as this area is developing at breakneck speed.
{"title":"Umělá inteligence a tlumočníci – víme, co nás čeká?","authors":"Ivana Čeňková","doi":"10.14712/24646830.2021.26","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14712/24646830.2021.26","url":null,"abstract":"Everyone is talking about artificial intelligence today, and it is a topic that hits the headlines. International research and projects include it in their terms of reference in the hunt for subsidies. It is well established in numerous industrial sectors and is presented as an integral part of new technologies. In short, it enters all areas of human activity and is becoming an unavoidable and omnipresent subject in 21st century society, and in the everyday lives of all of us. But do we really know what it means – or will mean – for us, and notably for interpreters? Will it influence or change interpreter training and the whole profession? If so, how? The author will be taking a layman’s view of this subject and put these questions (among many others) to students and interpreter trainers at the Institute of Translation Studies, Charles University and to Czech interpreters on the local and European market to see what they think, what they know, and how they view the future. After going through and analysing all the 77 answers from the sample, the author presents the results of this survey and will attempt to draw conclusions which will be preliminary, as this area is developing at breakneck speed.","PeriodicalId":234203,"journal":{"name":"AUC PHILOLOGICA","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130132042","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-11-16DOI: 10.14712/24646830.2021.34
Ivo Petrů
Book review on Tomáš Svoboda (ed.) (2019) Překlady pro EU. Institucionální překlad v kontextu institucí a orgánů Evropské unie, Praha: Nakladatelství Milada Karez.
关于 Tomáš Svoboda（编辑）（2019 年）《欧盟翻译：欧盟机构和组织背景下的机构翻译》的书评，布拉格：Milada Karez 出版社。
{"title":"Tomáš Svoboda (ed.) (2019) Překlady pro EU. Institucionální překlad v kontextu institucí a orgánů Evropské unie","authors":"Ivo Petrů","doi":"10.14712/24646830.2021.34","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14712/24646830.2021.34","url":null,"abstract":"Book review on Tomáš Svoboda (ed.) (2019) Překlady pro EU. Institucionální překlad v kontextu institucí a orgánů Evropské unie, Praha: Nakladatelství Milada Karez.","PeriodicalId":234203,"journal":{"name":"AUC PHILOLOGICA","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129026900","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-11-16DOI: 10.14712/24646830.2021.32
Michal Dvorecký
Book review on Oľga Wrede (2020) Theoretisch-pragmatische Reflexionen zur interlingualen Übersetzung ausgewählter Textsorten des Strafprozessrechts, Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovač.
Pub Date : 2022-11-16DOI: 10.14712/24646830.2021.30
Analía Rosa Cuadrado Rey
This article is related to the study of specialized translation, specifically to lexical and phraseological variation in legal translation. In fact, this study arises from the need to delve deeper into the study of Spanish phraseological units using larger corpora, considering the varieties that reflect the convergences and divergences of this language throughout the places where it is spoken. To this end, the paper approaches sentences using a comparative corpus-based approach analysing phraseological units used in Argentine and Spain. The research provides a brief contextualization of the legal systems of the selected countries, and, by using corpus linguistics, the PUs are extracted and compared. The main objective is to detect similarities and differences at the phraseological level in both languages and to provide functional equivalents in German that can be useful for students and translators. The findings show that at the methodological level corpus linguistics is a useful tool for the identification of PUs in specialized texts. Furthermore, the analysis of the examples from the corpus of sentences shows the evidence of lexical variants referring to the same reality both within a single variety of Spanish and between different varieties. This consequently determines the need to further study the PUs of Spanish by using a more extensive corpus, considering the different countries in which Spanish is an official language.
{"title":"Estudio de la variación fraseológica diatópica del español de España y de Argentina basado en corpus de sentencias: propuestas de traducción al alemán","authors":"Analía Rosa Cuadrado Rey","doi":"10.14712/24646830.2021.30","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14712/24646830.2021.30","url":null,"abstract":"This article is related to the study of specialized translation, specifically to lexical and phraseological variation in legal translation. In fact, this study arises from the need to delve deeper into the study of Spanish phraseological units using larger corpora, considering the varieties that reflect the convergences and divergences of this language throughout the places where it is spoken. To this end, the paper approaches sentences using a comparative corpus-based approach analysing phraseological units used in Argentine and Spain. The research provides a brief contextualization of the legal systems of the selected countries, and, by using corpus linguistics, the PUs are extracted and compared. The main objective is to detect similarities and differences at the phraseological level in both languages and to provide functional equivalents in German that can be useful for students and translators. The findings show that at the methodological level corpus linguistics is a useful tool for the identification of PUs in specialized texts. Furthermore, the analysis of the examples from the corpus of sentences shows the evidence of lexical variants referring to the same reality both within a single variety of Spanish and between different varieties. This consequently determines the need to further study the PUs of Spanish by using a more extensive corpus, considering the different countries in which Spanish is an official language.","PeriodicalId":234203,"journal":{"name":"AUC PHILOLOGICA","volume":"64 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125946117","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-11-16DOI: 10.14712/24646830.2021.25
Karolína Strnadová
This paper presents the particularities of translations of Czech literature into Spanish published in Mexico and focuses on the role of the translator in the translation-publishing process and on the genesis of a translation. The first aim is to discuss the particularities of literary translation from Czech into Spanish in relation to the book market in Spanish-speaking countries and to draw attention to the role of Spain and the different contexts of translation production outside this country. The second objective of this paper is to give voice to the five interviewed translators and, with the help of the obtained material and their statements, to interpret the relevant particularities of translation-publishing process on the axis author – original – translator – publisher – translation – reader. The main part of the paper consists of individual testimonies of contemporary translators whose Spanish translations of one or more Czech literary titles were published in Mexico. The testimonies, obtained by the method of interview, brought a new insight into the topic of Mexican translations of Czech literature and valuable information on the circumstances of a particular translation work’s genesis. The source of the presented results and the quoted translators’ statements is the research by Strnadová (2021) presented in the rigorosum thesis Translations of Czech Literature in Mexico, taking into account the Czech translations of Mexican literature.
{"title":"Překlady české literatury v Mexiku: příběhy geneze překladu z pohledu překladatelů","authors":"Karolína Strnadová","doi":"10.14712/24646830.2021.25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14712/24646830.2021.25","url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents the particularities of translations of Czech literature into Spanish published in Mexico and focuses on the role of the translator in the translation-publishing process and on the genesis of a translation. The first aim is to discuss the particularities of literary translation from Czech into Spanish in relation to the book market in Spanish-speaking countries and to draw attention to the role of Spain and the different contexts of translation production outside this country. The second objective of this paper is to give voice to the five interviewed translators and, with the help of the obtained material and their statements, to interpret the relevant particularities of translation-publishing process on the axis author – original – translator – publisher – translation – reader. The main part of the paper consists of individual testimonies of contemporary translators whose Spanish translations of one or more Czech literary titles were published in Mexico. The testimonies, obtained by the method of interview, brought a new insight into the topic of Mexican translations of Czech literature and valuable information on the circumstances of a particular translation work’s genesis. The source of the presented results and the quoted translators’ statements is the research by Strnadová (2021) presented in the rigorosum thesis Translations of Czech Literature in Mexico, taking into account the Czech translations of Mexican literature.","PeriodicalId":234203,"journal":{"name":"AUC PHILOLOGICA","volume":"134 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116585558","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-11-16DOI: 10.14712/24646830.2021.23
Stanislav Rubáš
In the present paper, the author has carried out a comparative analysis of Boris Pasternak’s rendering of Hamlet, which first appeared in 1940 and was republished time and again between 1941 and 1957, sometimes with major cuts and revisions. Recounting the disturbing history of the most famous Shakespearean translation in the Russian language and re-evaluating previous research on it, the author arrives at a conclusion that Pasternak’s Hamlet, by and large, aims at holding a mirror up to the times of the Stalinist Russia. The translation’s extensive political engagement is documented by juxtaposing Shakespeare’s original with Pasternak’s striking allusions to the times of terror in which he had to live.
{"title":"Pasternakův Hamlet a Stalinova hrůzovláda","authors":"Stanislav Rubáš","doi":"10.14712/24646830.2021.23","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14712/24646830.2021.23","url":null,"abstract":"In the present paper, the author has carried out a comparative analysis of Boris Pasternak’s rendering of Hamlet, which first appeared in 1940 and was republished time and again between 1941 and 1957, sometimes with major cuts and revisions. Recounting the disturbing history of the most famous Shakespearean translation in the Russian language and re-evaluating previous research on it, the author arrives at a conclusion that Pasternak’s Hamlet, by and large, aims at holding a mirror up to the times of the Stalinist Russia. The translation’s extensive political engagement is documented by juxtaposing Shakespeare’s original with Pasternak’s striking allusions to the times of terror in which he had to live.","PeriodicalId":234203,"journal":{"name":"AUC PHILOLOGICA","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127643410","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：