Steven Lindsey, Tim P Moran, Meredith A Stauch, Alexis L Lynch, Kristen Grabow Moore
Background: Training programs for advanced practice providers (APP) often have significant variability in their curriculum, including electrocardiogram (ECG) education. Despite limitations in formal ECG training, APPs in the emergency department (ED) may be the first practitioner to interpret an ECG. Foundations of Emergency Medicine (FoEM) offers free, open-access curricula that are widely used for resident education. We sought to improve APP ECG interpretation skills by implementing the FoEM ECG I course.
Methods: This was a single-site, pre- and post-intervention study of 23 APPs at our high-acuity, urban ED. In the fall of 2020, APP learners enrolled in a FoEM ECG I course led by faculty and senior resident instructors. The course consisted of six virtual, small-group, active-learning ECG workshops. Participants completed a 15-question multiple-choice test before, immediately after, and six months post-intervention to quantify knowledge acquisition. Additionally, a pre- and post-intervention knowledge, attitudes, and practices survey was administered on ECG interpretation skills and to evaluate the course. We evaluated change in ECG knowledge scores using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Changes in self-assessed knowledge were evaluated using an ordinal logistic mixed-effects regression.
Results: A total of 23 APPs enrolled in the course. Knowledge assessments showed APPs improved from the pre-test (median 9/15, interquartile range [IQR] 7-11) to the post-test (median 12/15, IQR 10-13; P = 0.001). Test scores did not significantly change from the post-test to the delayed post-test (median 12/15, IQR 12-13; P = 0.30). Respondents' subjective rating of their skill did not significantly change (P = 0.06). Respondents reported no change in their likelihood of approaching an attending when uncertain of the correct interpretation of an ECG (P = 0.16). Overall, 91% were satisfied with the course and 96% agreed that the course difficulty was appropriate.
Conclusion: The FoEM ECG course provided a standardized curriculum that improved APP knowledge for interpreting ECGs. Despite this, the course did not alter APPs' willingness to approach physicians for guidance with interpretation of abnormal ECGs. These findings may inform expansion of this concept for other programs who desire formalized APP ECG education.
{"title":"Bridging the Gap: Evaluation of an Electrocardiogram Curriculum for Advanced Practice Clinicians.","authors":"Steven Lindsey, Tim P Moran, Meredith A Stauch, Alexis L Lynch, Kristen Grabow Moore","doi":"10.5811/westjem.18085","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.18085","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Training programs for advanced practice providers (APP) often have significant variability in their curriculum, including electrocardiogram (ECG) education. Despite limitations in formal ECG training, APPs in the emergency department (ED) may be the first practitioner to interpret an ECG. Foundations of Emergency Medicine (FoEM) offers free, open-access curricula that are widely used for resident education. We sought to improve APP ECG interpretation skills by implementing the FoEM ECG I course.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-site, pre- and post-intervention study of 23 APPs at our high-acuity, urban ED. In the fall of 2020, APP learners enrolled in a FoEM ECG I course led by faculty and senior resident instructors. The course consisted of six virtual, small-group, active-learning ECG workshops. Participants completed a 15-question multiple-choice test before, immediately after, and six months post-intervention to quantify knowledge acquisition. Additionally, a pre- and post-intervention knowledge, attitudes, and practices survey was administered on ECG interpretation skills and to evaluate the course. We evaluated change in ECG knowledge scores using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Changes in self-assessed knowledge were evaluated using an ordinal logistic mixed-effects regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 23 APPs enrolled in the course. Knowledge assessments showed APPs improved from the pre-test (median 9/15, interquartile range [IQR] 7-11) to the post-test (median 12/15, IQR 10-13; <i>P</i> = 0.001). Test scores did not significantly change from the post-test to the delayed post-test (median 12/15, IQR 12-13; <i>P</i> = 0.30). Respondents' subjective rating of their skill did not significantly change (<i>P</i> = 0.06). Respondents reported no change in their likelihood of approaching an attending when uncertain of the correct interpretation of an ECG (<i>P</i> = 0.16). Overall, 91% were satisfied with the course and 96% agreed that the course difficulty was appropriate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The FoEM ECG course provided a standardized curriculum that improved APP knowledge for interpreting ECGs. Despite this, the course did not alter APPs' willingness to approach physicians for guidance with interpretation of abnormal ECGs. These findings may inform expansion of this concept for other programs who desire formalized APP ECG education.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 2","pages":"155-159"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11000549/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140859076","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Factors Associated with Overutilization of Computed Tomography Cervical Spine Imaging.","authors":"Tessy La Torre Torres, Jonathan McGhee","doi":"10.5811/westjem.18570","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.18570","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 2","pages":"301"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11000542/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140870773","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jessica R Balderston, Taylor Brittan, Bruce J Kimura, Chen Wang, Jordan Tozer
Introduction: The use of a reliable scoring system for quality assessment (QA) is imperative to limit inconsistencies in measuring ultrasound acquisition skills. The current grading scale used for QA endorsed by the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) is non-specific, applies irrespective of the type of study performed, and has not been rigorously validated. Our goal in this study was to determine whether a succinct, organ-specific grading scale designed for lung-specific QA would be more precise with better interobserver agreement.
Methods: This was a prospective validation study of an objective QA scale for lung ultrasound (LUS) in the emergency department. We identified the first 100 LUS performed in normal clinical practice in the year 2020. Four reviewers at an urban academic center who were either emergency ultrasound fellowship-trained or current fellows with at least six months of QA experience scored each study, resulting in a total of 400. The primary outcome was the level of agreement between the reviewers. Our secondary outcome was the variability of the scores given to the studies. For the agreement between reviewers, we computed the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) based on a two-way random-effect model with a single rater for each grading scale. We generated 10,000 bootstrapped ICCs to construct 95% confidence intervals (CI) for both grading systems. A two-sided one-sample t-test was used to determine whether there were differences in the bootstrapped ICCs between the two grading systems.
Results: The ICC between reviewers was 0.552 (95% CI 0.40-0.68) for the ACEP grading scale and 0.703 (95% CI 0.59-0.79) for the novel grading scale (P < 0.001), indicating significantly more interobserver agreement using the novel scale compared to the ACEP scale. The variance of scores was similar (0.93 and 0.92 for the novel and ACEP scales, respectively).
Conclusion: We found an increased interobserver agreement between reviewers when using the novel, organ-specific scale when compared with the ACEP grading scale. Increased consistency in feedback based on objective criteria directed to the specific, targeted organ provides an opportunity to enhance learner education and satisfaction with their ultrasound education.
{"title":"Novel Scoring Scale for Quality Assessment of Lung Ultrasound in the Emergency Department.","authors":"Jessica R Balderston, Taylor Brittan, Bruce J Kimura, Chen Wang, Jordan Tozer","doi":"10.5811/westjem.18225","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.18225","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The use of a reliable scoring system for quality assessment (QA) is imperative to limit inconsistencies in measuring ultrasound acquisition skills. The current grading scale used for QA endorsed by the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) is non-specific, applies irrespective of the type of study performed, and has not been rigorously validated. Our goal in this study was to determine whether a succinct, organ-specific grading scale designed for lung-specific QA would be more precise with better interobserver agreement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective validation study of an objective QA scale for lung ultrasound (LUS) in the emergency department. We identified the first 100 LUS performed in normal clinical practice in the year 2020. Four reviewers at an urban academic center who were either emergency ultrasound fellowship-trained or current fellows with at least six months of QA experience scored each study, resulting in a total of 400. The primary outcome was the level of agreement between the reviewers. Our secondary outcome was the variability of the scores given to the studies. For the agreement between reviewers, we computed the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) based on a two-way random-effect model with a single rater for each grading scale. We generated 10,000 bootstrapped ICCs to construct 95% confidence intervals (CI) for both grading systems. A two-sided one-sample <i>t</i>-test was used to determine whether there were differences in the bootstrapped ICCs between the two grading systems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ICC between reviewers was 0.552 (95% CI 0.40-0.68) for the ACEP grading scale and 0.703 (95% CI 0.59-0.79) for the novel grading scale (<i>P</i> < 0.001), indicating significantly more interobserver agreement using the novel scale compared to the ACEP scale. The variance of scores was similar (0.93 and 0.92 for the novel and ACEP scales, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found an increased interobserver agreement between reviewers when using the novel, organ-specific scale when compared with the ACEP grading scale. Increased consistency in feedback based on objective criteria directed to the specific, targeted organ provides an opportunity to enhance learner education and satisfaction with their ultrasound education.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 2","pages":"264-267"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11000556/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140870075","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kimberly Souffront, Bret P Nelson, Megan Lukas, Hans Reyes Garay, Lauren Gordon, Thalia Matos, Isabella Hanesworth, Rebecca Mantel, Claire Shubeck, Cassidy Bernstein, George T Loo, Lynne D Richardson
Introduction: Hypertension is the leading risk factor for morbidity and mortality throughout the world and is pervasive in United States emergency departments (ED). This study documents the point prevalence of subclinical heart disease in emergency patients with asymptomatic hypertension.
Method: This was a prospective observational study of ED patients with asymptomatic hypertension conducted at two urban academic EDs that belong to an eight-hospital healthcare organization in New York. Adult (≥18 years of age) English- or Spanish-speaking patients who had an initial blood pressure (BP) ≥160/100 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) and second BP ≥140/90 mm Hg, and pending discharge, were invited to participate in the study. We excluded patients with congestive heart failure, renal insufficiency, and atrial fibrillation, or who were pregnant, a prisoner, cognitively unable to provide informed consent, or experiencing symptoms of hypertension. We assessed echocardiographic evidence of subclinical heart disease (left ventricular hypertrophy, and diastolic and systolic dysfunction).
Results: A total of 53 patients were included in the study; a majority were young (mean 49.5 years old, [SD 14-52]), self-identified as Black or Other (n = 39; 73.5%), and female (n = 30; 56.6%). Mean initial blood pressure was 172/100 mm Hg, and 24 patients (45.3%) self-reported a history of hypertension. Fifty patients completed an echocardiogram. All (100%) had evidence of subclinical heart disease, with 41 (77.4%) displaying left ventricular hypertrophy and 31 (58.5%) diastolic dysfunction. There was a significant relationship between diastolic dysfunction and female gender [x2 (1, n = 53) = 3.98; P = 0.046]; Black or other race [x2 (3, n = 53) = 9.138; P = 0.03] and Hispanic or other ethnicity [x2 (2, n = 53) = 8.03; P = 0.02]. Less than one third of patients demonstrated systolic dysfunction on echocardiogram, and this was more likely to occur in patients with diabetes mellitus [x2 (1, n = 51) = 4.84; P = 0.02].
Conclusion: There is a high probability that Black, Hispanic, and female patients with asymptomatic hypertension are on the continuum for developing overt heart failure. Emergency clinicians should provide individualized care that considers their unique health needs, cultural backgrounds, and social determinants of health.
导言:高血压是全世界发病率和死亡率的主要风险因素,在美国急诊科(ED)中也很普遍。本研究记录了无症状高血压急诊患者亚临床心脏病的发病率:这是一项针对无症状高血压急诊患者的前瞻性观察研究,在纽约的两家城市学术急诊室进行,这两家急诊室隶属于纽约的一家八医院医疗机构。邀请初次血压(BP)≥160/100 毫米汞柱(mmHg)和第二次血压≥140/90 毫米汞柱(mmHg)且即将出院的英语或西班牙语成人(≥18 岁)患者参与研究。我们排除了充血性心力衰竭、肾功能不全和心房颤动患者,或孕妇、囚犯、认知能力无法做出知情同意或出现高血压症状的患者。我们评估了亚临床心脏病(左心室肥大、舒张和收缩功能障碍)的超声心动图证据:本研究共纳入 53 名患者,其中大部分患者为年轻人(平均 49.5 岁,[SD 14-52]),自认为是黑人或其他族裔(39 人;73.5%),女性(30 人;56.6%)。初始平均血压为 172/100 mm Hg,24 名患者(45.3%)自述有高血压病史。50 名患者完成了超声心动图检查。所有患者(100%)都有亚临床心脏病的证据,其中 41 人(77.4%)显示左心室肥厚,31 人(58.5%)显示舒张功能障碍。舒张功能障碍与女性性别[x2 (1, n = 53) = 3.98; P = 0.046]、黑人或其他种族[x2 (3, n = 53) = 9.138; P = 0.03]和西班牙裔或其他种族[x2 (2, n = 53) = 8.03; P = 0.02]有明显关系。不到三分之一的患者在超声心动图上显示出收缩功能障碍,糖尿病患者更容易出现这种情况[x2(1,n = 51)= 4.84;P = 0.02]:结论:黑人、西班牙裔和女性无症状高血压患者极有可能发展为明显的心力衰竭。急诊医生应考虑到他们独特的健康需求、文化背景和健康的社会决定因素,为他们提供个性化的护理。
{"title":"Stage B Heart Failure Is Ubiquitous in Emergency Patients with Asymptomatic Hypertension.","authors":"Kimberly Souffront, Bret P Nelson, Megan Lukas, Hans Reyes Garay, Lauren Gordon, Thalia Matos, Isabella Hanesworth, Rebecca Mantel, Claire Shubeck, Cassidy Bernstein, George T Loo, Lynne D Richardson","doi":"10.5811/westjem.17990","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.17990","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hypertension is the leading risk factor for morbidity and mortality throughout the world and is pervasive in United States emergency departments (ED). This study documents the point prevalence of subclinical heart disease in emergency patients with asymptomatic hypertension.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This was a prospective observational study of ED patients with asymptomatic hypertension conducted at two urban academic EDs that belong to an eight-hospital healthcare organization in New York. Adult (≥18 years of age) English- or Spanish-speaking patients who had an initial blood pressure (BP) ≥160/100 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) and second BP ≥140/90 mm Hg, and pending discharge, were invited to participate in the study. We excluded patients with congestive heart failure, renal insufficiency, and atrial fibrillation, or who were pregnant, a prisoner, cognitively unable to provide informed consent, or experiencing symptoms of hypertension. We assessed echocardiographic evidence of subclinical heart disease (left ventricular hypertrophy, and diastolic and systolic dysfunction).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 53 patients were included in the study; a majority were young (mean 49.5 years old, [SD 14-52]), self-identified as Black or Other (n = 39; 73.5%), and female (n = 30; 56.6%). Mean initial blood pressure was 172/100 mm Hg, and 24 patients (45.3%) self-reported a history of hypertension. Fifty patients completed an echocardiogram. All (100%) had evidence of subclinical heart disease, with 41 (77.4%) displaying left ventricular hypertrophy and 31 (58.5%) diastolic dysfunction. There was a significant relationship between diastolic dysfunction and female gender [x<sup>2</sup> (1, n = 53) = 3.98; <i>P</i> = 0.046]; Black or other race [x<sup>2</sup> (3, n = 53) = 9.138; <i>P</i> = 0.03] and Hispanic or other ethnicity [x<sup>2</sup> (2, n = 53) = 8.03; <i>P</i> = 0.02]. Less than one third of patients demonstrated systolic dysfunction on echocardiogram, and this was more likely to occur in patients with diabetes mellitus [x<sup>2</sup> (1, n = 51) = 4.84; <i>P</i> = 0.02].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a high probability that Black, Hispanic, and female patients with asymptomatic hypertension are on the continuum for developing overt heart failure. Emergency clinicians should provide individualized care that considers their unique health needs, cultural backgrounds, and social determinants of health.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 2","pages":"160-165"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11000548/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140870822","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jeffrey N Love, Anne M Messman, Jonathan S Ilgen, Chris Merritt, Wendy C Coates, Douglas S Ander, David P Way
Introduction: Despite the importance of peer review to publications, there is no generally accepted approach for editorial evaluation of a peer review's value to a journal editor's decision-making. The graduate medical education editors of the Western Journal of Emergency Medicine Special Issue in Educational Research & Practice (Special Issue) developed and studied the holistic editor's scoring rubric (HESR) with the objective of assessing the quality of a review and an emphasis on the degree to which it informs a holistic appreciation for the submission under consideration.
Methods: Using peer-review guidelines from several journals, the Special Issue's editors formulated the rubric as descriptions of peer reviews of varying degree of quality from the ideal to the unacceptable. Once a review was assessed by each editor using the rubric, the score was submitted to a third party for blinding purposes. We compared the performance of the new rubric to a previously used semantic differential scale instrument. Kane's validity framework guided the evaluation of the new scoring rubric around three basic assumptions: improved distribution of scores; relative consistency rather than absolute inter-rater reliability across editors; and statistical evidence that editors valued peer reviews that contributed most to their decision-making.
Results: Ninety peer reviews were the subject of this study, all were assessed by two editors. Compared to the highly skewed distribution of the prior rating scale, the distribution of the new scoring rubric was bell shaped and demonstrated full use of the rubric scale. Absolute agreement between editors was low to moderate, while relative consistency between editor's rubric ratings was high. Finally, we showed that recommendations of higher rated peer reviews were more likely to concur with the editor's formal decision.
Conclusion: Early evidence regarding the HESR supports the use of this instrument in determining the quality of peer reviews as well as its relative importance in informing editorial decision-making.
{"title":"Development and Validation of a Scoring Rubric for Editorial Evaluation of Peer-review Quality: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Jeffrey N Love, Anne M Messman, Jonathan S Ilgen, Chris Merritt, Wendy C Coates, Douglas S Ander, David P Way","doi":"10.5811/westjem.18432","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.18432","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite the importance of peer review to publications, there is no generally accepted approach for editorial evaluation of a peer review's value to a journal editor's decision-making. The graduate medical education editors of the <i>Western Journal of Emergency Medicine</i> Special Issue in Educational Research & Practice (Special Issue) developed and studied the holistic editor's scoring rubric (HESR) with the objective of assessing the quality of a review and an emphasis on the degree to which it informs a holistic appreciation for the submission under consideration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using peer-review guidelines from several journals, the Special Issue's editors formulated the rubric as descriptions of peer reviews of varying degree of quality from the ideal to the unacceptable. Once a review was assessed by each editor using the rubric, the score was submitted to a third party for blinding purposes. We compared the performance of the new rubric to a previously used semantic differential scale instrument. Kane's validity framework guided the evaluation of the new scoring rubric around three basic assumptions: improved distribution of scores; relative consistency rather than absolute inter-rater reliability across editors; and statistical evidence that editors valued peer reviews that contributed most to their decision-making.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety peer reviews were the subject of this study, all were assessed by two editors. Compared to the highly skewed distribution of the prior rating scale, the distribution of the new scoring rubric was bell shaped and demonstrated full use of the rubric scale. Absolute agreement between editors was low to moderate, while relative consistency between editor's rubric ratings was high. Finally, we showed that recommendations of higher rated peer reviews were more likely to concur with the editor's formal decision.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early evidence regarding the HESR supports the use of this instrument in determining the quality of peer reviews as well as its relative importance in informing editorial decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 2","pages":"254-263"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11000557/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140855383","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kaileen Jafari, Kristen Carlin, Derya Caglar, Eileen J Klein, Tamara D Simon
Introduction: Most pediatric emergency care occurs in general emergency departments (GED), where less pediatric experience and lower pediatric emergency readiness may compromise care. Medically vulnerable pediatric patients, such as those with chronic, severe, neurologic conditions, are likely to be disproportionately affected by suboptimal care in GEDs; however, little is known about characteristics of their care in either the general or pediatric emergency setting. In this study our objective was to compare the frequency, characteristics, and outcomes of ED visits made by children with chronic neurologic diseases between general and pediatric EDs (PED).
Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the 2011-2014 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) for ED visits made by patients 0-21 years with neurologic complex chronic conditions (neuro CCC). We compared patient, hospital, and ED visits characteristics between GEDs and PEDs using descriptive statistics. We assessed outcomes of admission, transfer, critical procedure performance, and mortality using multivariable logistic regression.
Results: There were 387,813 neuro CCC ED visits (0.3% of 0-21-year-old ED visits) in our sample. Care occurred predominantly in GEDs, and visits were associated with a high severity of illness (30.1% highest severity classification score). Compared to GED visits, PED neuro CCC visits were comprised of individuals who were younger, more likely to have comorbid conditions (32.9% vs 21%, P < 0.001), and technology assistance (65.4% vs. 45.9%) but underwent fewer procedures and had lower ED charges ($2,200 vs $1,520, P < 0.001). Visits to PEDs had lower adjusted odds of critical procedures (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62-0.87), transfers (aOR 0.14, 95% CI 0.04-0.56), and mortality (aOR 0.38, 95% CI 0.19-0.75) compared to GEDs.
Conclusion: Care for children with neuro CCCs in a pediatric ED is associated with less resource utilization and lower rates of transfer and mortality. Identifying features of PED care for neuro CCCs could lead to lower costs and mortality for this population.
{"title":"National Characteristics of Emergency Care for Children with Neurologic Complex Chronic Conditions.","authors":"Kaileen Jafari, Kristen Carlin, Derya Caglar, Eileen J Klein, Tamara D Simon","doi":"10.5811/westjem.17834","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.17834","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Most pediatric emergency care occurs in general emergency departments (GED), where less pediatric experience and lower pediatric emergency readiness may compromise care. Medically vulnerable pediatric patients, such as those with chronic, severe, neurologic conditions, are likely to be disproportionately affected by suboptimal care in GEDs; however, little is known about characteristics of their care in either the general or pediatric emergency setting. In this study our objective was to compare the frequency, characteristics, and outcomes of ED visits made by children with chronic neurologic diseases between general and pediatric EDs (PED).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of the 2011-2014 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) for ED visits made by patients 0-21 years with neurologic complex chronic conditions (neuro CCC). We compared patient, hospital, and ED visits characteristics between GEDs and PEDs using descriptive statistics. We assessed outcomes of admission, transfer, critical procedure performance, and mortality using multivariable logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 387,813 neuro CCC ED visits (0.3% of 0-21-year-old ED visits) in our sample. Care occurred predominantly in GEDs, and visits were associated with a high severity of illness (30.1% highest severity classification score). Compared to GED visits, PED neuro CCC visits were comprised of individuals who were younger, more likely to have comorbid conditions (32.9% vs 21%, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and technology assistance (65.4% vs. 45.9%) but underwent fewer procedures and had lower ED charges ($2,200 vs $1,520, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Visits to PEDs had lower adjusted odds of critical procedures (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62-0.87), transfers (aOR 0.14, 95% CI 0.04-0.56), and mortality (aOR 0.38, 95% CI 0.19-0.75) compared to GEDs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Care for children with neuro CCCs in a pediatric ED is associated with less resource utilization and lower rates of transfer and mortality. Identifying features of PED care for neuro CCCs could lead to lower costs and mortality for this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 2","pages":"237-245"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11000559/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140869102","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Molly Estes, Jacob Garcia, Ronnie Ren, Mark Olaf, Shannon Moffett, Michael Galuska, Xiao Chi Zhang
Background: Academic emergency medicine (EM) communities have viewed anonymous online communities (AOC) such as Reddit or specialty-specific "applicant spreadsheets" as poor advising resources. Despite this, robust EM AOCs exist, with large user bases and heavy readership. Insights about applicants' authentic experiences can be critical for applicants and program leadership decision-making. To date, there are no EM studies to qualitatively assess EM AOC narratives during the application cycle. Our goal was to perform a qualitative analysis of students' EM program experiences through a publicly available AOC.
Methods: This was a qualitative analysis of a publicly available, time-stamped, user-locked AOC dataset: "Official 2020-2021 Emergency Medicine Applicant Spreadsheet." We extracted and then de-identified all data from selected sub-sheets entitled "Virtual Interview Impressions" and "Rotation Impressions." Four investigators used constant comparative method to analyze the data inductively, and they subsequently met to generate common themes discussed by students. Preliminary thematic analysis was conducted on a random sample of 37/183 (20%) independent narratives to create the initial codebook. This was used and updated iteratively to analyze the entire narrative set consisting of 841 discrete statements. Finally, two unique codes were created to distinguish whether the identified sub-themes, or program attributes, were likely "modifiable" or "non-modifiable."
Results: We identified six major themes: living and working conditions; interpersonal relationships; learning experiences, postgraduate readiness, and online/virtual supplements. Common sub-themes included patient population (13%); resident personality (7%); program leadership personality (7%); relationship with faculty/leadership (6%); geography (4%); practice setting (4%); program reputation (4%), and postgraduate year-3 experiences (4%). Modifiable sub-themes outnumbered non-modifiable sub-themes, 60.7% to 39.3%.
Conclusion: In this analysis of selected medical students' narratives in an AOC, the majority of identified themes represented topics that may serve as external feedback for EM residency programs and their clerkships. Selective use of AOCs may set a precedent for future program assessments by applicants and inform program leadership of important programmatic elements in the eyes of applicants. It elucidates important themes in their interactions or learning experiences with programs and creates opportunities for learner-centric program improvement.
背景:急诊医学(EM)学术界一直将 Reddit 等匿名在线社区(AOC)或特定专业的 "申请者电子表格 "视为糟糕的咨询资源。尽管如此,仍然存在着强大的急诊医学 AOC,它们拥有庞大的用户群和大量的读者。了解申请者的真实经历对申请者和项目领导决策至关重要。迄今为止,还没有任何关于在申请周期内对 EM AOC 叙述进行定性评估的 EM 研究。我们的目标是通过公开的AOC对学生的EM项目经历进行定性分析:这是对一个公开的、有时间戳的、用户锁定的 AOC 数据集进行的定性分析:"2020-2021年急诊医学申请官方电子表格"。我们从选定的 "虚拟面试印象 "和 "轮转印象 "子表中提取了所有数据,然后进行了去标识化处理。四名调查人员采用不断比较法对数据进行归纳分析,随后他们开会讨论学生们讨论的共同主题。对 37/183 份(20%)独立叙述中的随机样本进行了初步主题分析,以创建初始代码集。在分析由 841 个离散语句组成的整个叙述集时,使用并反复更新了该编码集。最后,我们创建了两个独特的代码,以区分所确定的次主题或计划属性是 "可修改 "还是 "不可修改":我们确定了六大主题:生活和工作条件;人际关系;学习经历;毕业后的准备情况;在线/虚拟补充。常见的次主题包括:患者群体(13%);住院医师个性(7%);项目领导个性(7%);与教师/领导的关系(6%);地理位置(4%);实践环境(4%);项目声誉(4%)以及研究生第三年的经历(4%)。可修改子主题的比例为 60.7%:39.3%:在对选定的医学生在 AOC 中的叙述进行的分析中,大部分已确定的主题代表了可作为 EM 住院医师培训项目及其实习的外部反馈的主题。有选择性地使用AOC可能会为申请者未来的项目评估开创先例,并让项目领导了解申请者眼中重要的项目要素。它阐明了他们与项目互动或学习经历中的重要主题,并为以学习者为中心的项目改进创造了机会。
{"title":"Analysis of Anonymous Student Narratives About Experiences with Emergency Medicine Residency Programs.","authors":"Molly Estes, Jacob Garcia, Ronnie Ren, Mark Olaf, Shannon Moffett, Michael Galuska, Xiao Chi Zhang","doi":"10.5811/westjem.17973","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.17973","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Academic emergency medicine (EM) communities have viewed anonymous online communities (AOC) such as Reddit or specialty-specific \"applicant spreadsheets\" as poor advising resources. Despite this, robust EM AOCs exist, with large user bases and heavy readership. Insights about applicants' authentic experiences can be critical for applicants and program leadership decision-making. To date, there are no EM studies to qualitatively assess EM AOC narratives during the application cycle. Our goal was to perform a qualitative analysis of students' EM program experiences through a publicly available AOC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a qualitative analysis of a publicly available, time-stamped, user-locked AOC dataset: \"Official 2020-2021 Emergency Medicine Applicant Spreadsheet.\" We extracted and then de-identified all data from selected sub-sheets entitled \"Virtual Interview Impressions\" and \"Rotation Impressions.\" Four investigators used constant comparative method to analyze the data inductively, and they subsequently met to generate common themes discussed by students. Preliminary thematic analysis was conducted on a random sample of 37/183 (20%) independent narratives to create the initial codebook. This was used and updated iteratively to analyze the entire narrative set consisting of 841 discrete statements. Finally, two unique codes were created to distinguish whether the identified sub-themes, or program attributes, were likely \"modifiable\" or \"non-modifiable.\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified six major themes: living and working conditions; interpersonal relationships; learning experiences, postgraduate readiness, and online/virtual supplements. Common sub-themes included patient population (13%); resident personality (7%); program leadership personality (7%); relationship with faculty/leadership (6%); geography (4%); practice setting (4%); program reputation (4%), and postgraduate year-3 experiences (4%). Modifiable sub-themes outnumbered non-modifiable sub-themes, 60.7% to 39.3%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this analysis of selected medical students' narratives in an AOC, the majority of identified themes represented topics that may serve as external feedback for EM residency programs and their clerkships. Selective use of AOCs may set a precedent for future program assessments by applicants and inform program leadership of important programmatic elements in the eyes of applicants. It elucidates important themes in their interactions or learning experiences with programs and creates opportunities for learner-centric program improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 2","pages":"191-196"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11000561/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140860296","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Patients with mental health diagnoses (MHD) are among the most frequent emergency department (ED) users, suggesting the importance of identifying additional factors associated with their ED use frequency. In this study we assessed various patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, and service use associated with low ED users (1-3 visits/year), compared to high (4-7) and very high (8+) ED users with MHD.
Methods: Our study was conducted in four large Quebec (Canada) ED networks. A total of 299 patients with MHD were randomly recruited from these ED in 2021-2022. Structured interviews complemented data from network health records, providing extensive data on participant profiles and their quality of care. We used multivariable multinomial logistic regression to compare low ED use to high and very high ED use.
Results: Over a 12-month period, 39% of patients were low ED users, 37% high, and 24% very high ED users. Compared with low ED users, those at greater probability for high or very high ED use exhibited more violent/disturbed behaviors or social problems, chronic physical illnesses, and barriers to unmet needs. Patients previously hospitalized 1-2 times had lower risk of high or very high ED use than those not previously hospitalized. Compared with low ED users, high and very high ED users showed higher prevalence of personality disorders and suicidal behaviors, respectively. Women had greater probability of high ED use than men. Patients living in rental housing had greater probability of being very high ED users than those living in private housing. Using at least 5+ primary care services and being recurrent ED users two years prior to the last year of ED use had increased probability of very high ED use.
Conclusion: Frequency of ED use was associated with complex issues and higher perceived barriers to unmet needs among patients. Very high ED users had more severe recurrent conditions, such as isolation and suicidal behaviors, despite using more primary care services. Results suggested substantial reduction of barriers to care and improvement on both access and continuity of care for these vulnerable patients, integrating crisis resolution and supported housing services. Limited hospitalizations may sometimes be indicated, protecting against ED use.
{"title":"Characteristics for Low, High and Very High Emergency Department Use for Mental Health Diagnoses from Health Records and Structured Interviews.","authors":"Marie-Josée Fleury, Zhirong Cao, Guy Grenier","doi":"10.5811/westjem.18327","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.18327","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients with mental health diagnoses (MHD) are among the most frequent emergency department (ED) users, suggesting the importance of identifying additional factors associated with their ED use frequency. In this study we assessed various patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, and service use associated with low ED users (1-3 visits/year), compared to high (4-7) and very high (8+) ED users with MHD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study was conducted in four large Quebec (Canada) ED networks. A total of 299 patients with MHD were randomly recruited from these ED in 2021-2022. Structured interviews complemented data from network health records, providing extensive data on participant profiles and their quality of care. We used multivariable multinomial logistic regression to compare low ED use to high and very high ED use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a 12-month period, 39% of patients were low ED users, 37% high, and 24% very high ED users. Compared with low ED users, those at greater probability for high or very high ED use exhibited more violent/disturbed behaviors or social problems, chronic physical illnesses, and barriers to unmet needs. Patients previously hospitalized 1-2 times had lower risk of high or very high ED use than those not previously hospitalized. Compared with low ED users, high and very high ED users showed higher prevalence of personality disorders and suicidal behaviors, respectively. Women had greater probability of high ED use than men. Patients living in rental housing had greater probability of being very high ED users than those living in private housing. Using at least 5+ primary care services and being recurrent ED users two years prior to the last year of ED use had increased probability of very high ED use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Frequency of ED use was associated with complex issues and higher perceived barriers to unmet needs among patients. Very high ED users had more severe recurrent conditions, such as isolation and suicidal behaviors, despite using more primary care services. Results suggested substantial reduction of barriers to care and improvement on both access and continuity of care for these vulnerable patients, integrating crisis resolution and supported housing services. Limited hospitalizations may sometimes be indicated, protecting against ED use.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 2","pages":"144-154"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11000562/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140858265","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Arjun Dhanik, Bryan A Stenson, Robin B Levenson, Peter S Antkowiak, Leon D Sanchez, David T Chiu
Introduction: A solution for emergency department (ED) congestion remains elusive. As reliance on imaging grows, computed tomography (CT) turnaround time has been identified as a major bottleneck. In this study we sought to identify factors associated with significantly delayed CT in the ED.
Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of all CT imaging completed at an urban, tertiary care ED from May 1-July 31, 2021. During that period, 5,685 CTs were performed on 4,344 patients, with a median time from CT order to completion of 108 minutes (Quartile 1 [Q1]: 57 minutes, Quartile 3 [Q3]: 182 minutes, interquartile range [IQR]: 125 minutes). Outliers were defined as studies that took longer than 369 minutes to complete (Q3 + 1.5 × IQR). We systematically reviewed outlier charts to determine factors associated with delay and identified five factors: behaviorally non-compliant or medically unstable patients; intravenous (IV) line issues; contrast allergies; glomerular filtration rate (GFR) concerns; and delays related to imaging protocol (eg, need for IV contrast, request for oral and/or rectal contrast). We calculated confidence intervals (CI) using the modified Wald method. Inter-rater reliability was assessed with a kappa analysis.
Results: We identified a total of 182 outliers (4.2% of total patients). Fifteen (8.2%) cases were excluded for CT time-stamp inconsistencies. Of the 167 outliers analyzed, 38 delays (22.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 17.0-29.7) were due to behaviorally non-compliant or medically unstable patients; 30 (18.0%, 95% CI 12.8-24.5) were due to IV issues; 24 (14.4%, 95% CI 9.8-20.6) were due to contrast allergies; 21 (12.6%, 95% CI 8.3-18.5) were due to GFR concerns; and 20 (12.0%, 95% CI 7.8-17.9) were related to imaging study protocols. The cause of the delay was unknown in 55 cases (32.9%, 95% CI 26.3-40.4).
Conclusion: Our review identified both modifiable and non-modifiable factors associated with significantly delayed CT in the ED. Patient factors such as behavior, allergies, and medical acuity cannot be controlled. However, institutional policies regarding difficult IV access, contrast administration in low GFR settings, and study protocols may be modified, capturing up to 42.6% of outliers.
{"title":"Root Cause Analysis of Delayed Emergency Department Computed Tomography Scans.","authors":"Arjun Dhanik, Bryan A Stenson, Robin B Levenson, Peter S Antkowiak, Leon D Sanchez, David T Chiu","doi":"10.5811/westjem.17831","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.17831","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A solution for emergency department (ED) congestion remains elusive. As reliance on imaging grows, computed tomography (CT) turnaround time has been identified as a major bottleneck. In this study we sought to identify factors associated with significantly delayed CT in the ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of all CT imaging completed at an urban, tertiary care ED from May 1-July 31, 2021. During that period, 5,685 CTs were performed on 4,344 patients, with a median time from CT order to completion of 108 minutes (Quartile 1 [Q1]: 57 minutes, Quartile 3 [Q3]: 182 minutes, interquartile range [IQR]: 125 minutes). Outliers were defined as studies that took longer than 369 minutes to complete (Q3 + 1.5 × IQR). We systematically reviewed outlier charts to determine factors associated with delay and identified five factors: behaviorally non-compliant or medically unstable patients; intravenous (IV) line issues; contrast allergies; glomerular filtration rate (GFR) concerns; and delays related to imaging protocol (eg, need for IV contrast, request for oral and/or rectal contrast). We calculated confidence intervals (CI) using the modified Wald method. Inter-rater reliability was assessed with a kappa analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified a total of 182 outliers (4.2% of total patients). Fifteen (8.2%) cases were excluded for CT time-stamp inconsistencies. Of the 167 outliers analyzed, 38 delays (22.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 17.0-29.7) were due to behaviorally non-compliant or medically unstable patients; 30 (18.0%, 95% CI 12.8-24.5) were due to IV issues; 24 (14.4%, 95% CI 9.8-20.6) were due to contrast allergies; 21 (12.6%, 95% CI 8.3-18.5) were due to GFR concerns; and 20 (12.0%, 95% CI 7.8-17.9) were related to imaging study protocols. The cause of the delay was unknown in 55 cases (32.9%, 95% CI 26.3-40.4).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our review identified both modifiable and non-modifiable factors associated with significantly delayed CT in the ED. Patient factors such as behavior, allergies, and medical acuity cannot be controlled. However, institutional policies regarding difficult IV access, contrast administration in low GFR settings, and study protocols may be modified, capturing up to 42.6% of outliers.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 2","pages":"226-229"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11000564/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140860539","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Chanel Fischetti, Emily Frisch, Michael Loesche, Andrew Goldsmith, Ben Mormann, Joseph S Savage, Roger Dias, Nicole Duggan
Space travel has transformed in the past several years. Given the burgeoning market for space tourism, in-flight medical emergencies are likely to be expected. Ultrasound is one of the few diagnostic and therapeutic modalities available for astronauts in space. However, while point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is available, there is no current standard of training for astronaut preparation. We suggest an organized and structured methodology by which astronauts should best prepare for space with the medical equipment available on board. As technology continues to evolve, the assistance of other artificial intelligence and augmented reality systems are likely to facilitate training and dynamic real-time needs during space emergencies. Summary: As space tourism continues to evolve, an organized methodology for POCUS use is advised to best prepare astronauts for space.
{"title":"Space Ultrasound: A Proposal for Competency-based Ultrasound Training for In-flight Space Medicine.","authors":"Chanel Fischetti, Emily Frisch, Michael Loesche, Andrew Goldsmith, Ben Mormann, Joseph S Savage, Roger Dias, Nicole Duggan","doi":"10.5811/westjem.18422","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.18422","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Space travel has transformed in the past several years. Given the burgeoning market for space tourism, in-flight medical emergencies are likely to be expected. Ultrasound is one of the few diagnostic and therapeutic modalities available for astronauts in space. However, while point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is available, there is no current standard of training for astronaut preparation. We suggest an organized and structured methodology by which astronauts should best prepare for space with the medical equipment available on board. As technology continues to evolve, the assistance of other artificial intelligence and augmented reality systems are likely to facilitate training and dynamic real-time needs during space emergencies. <b>Summary:</b> As space tourism continues to evolve, an organized methodology for POCUS use is advised to best prepare astronauts for space.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 2","pages":"275-281"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11000543/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140864838","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}