Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.31249/litzhur/2023.60.12
{"title":"“EVERYTHING IS DONE IN THE MOST HONEST WAY...”: FRANZ KAFKA AND PASCALE KASANOVA ON THE PHENOMENON OF “SMALL LITERATURES”","authors":"","doi":"10.31249/litzhur/2023.60.12","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31249/litzhur/2023.60.12","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":246030,"journal":{"name":"Literaturovedcheskii Zhurnal","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131889120","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.31249/litzhur/2022.55.03
A. Fedorov
The article examines the complex relationship of A.K. Tolstoy to the Slavophiles and their teachings. These relationships have been reflected in creativity and have undergone significant changes over time. Relative proximity - mid-1850 s, dialogue - late 1850 s-early 1860 s, polemic -late 1860 s-1870 s. The period of unity was associated with his interest as an artist in folk song stylistics and the idea of Slavic reunification. Then the desire to explain his aesthetic position matures in him, which is at odds with the ideas of the Slavophiles about the meaning and purpose of art (a poetic message to “I.S. Aksakov”). Subsequently, the dialogue develops into a polemic with a wider range of issues - Tolstoy does not accept a utilitarian attitude to literature, defends his understanding of the people, rethinks the role of Peter the Great in Russian history, exposes the painful consequences of the “Moscow” period, stigmatizes “Tatarism” as a dream of a new khan and an apology for tyranny and slavery, does not want to recognize superiority over the West in moral and religious terms, finally, paradoxically brings nihilists and Slavophiles closer, showing the destructive consequences of their ideas (“Potok-bogatyr”).
{"title":"“I’M A PEOPLE TOO”: ALEXEI KONSTANTINOVICH TOLSTOY AND THE SLAVOPHILES","authors":"A. Fedorov","doi":"10.31249/litzhur/2022.55.03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31249/litzhur/2022.55.03","url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the complex relationship of A.K. Tolstoy to the Slavophiles and their teachings. These relationships have been reflected in creativity and have undergone significant changes over time. Relative proximity - mid-1850 s, dialogue - late 1850 s-early 1860 s, polemic -late 1860 s-1870 s. The period of unity was associated with his interest as an artist in folk song stylistics and the idea of Slavic reunification. Then the desire to explain his aesthetic position matures in him, which is at odds with the ideas of the Slavophiles about the meaning and purpose of art (a poetic message to “I.S. Aksakov”). Subsequently, the dialogue develops into a polemic with a wider range of issues - Tolstoy does not accept a utilitarian attitude to literature, defends his understanding of the people, rethinks the role of Peter the Great in Russian history, exposes the painful consequences of the “Moscow” period, stigmatizes “Tatarism” as a dream of a new khan and an apology for tyranny and slavery, does not want to recognize superiority over the West in moral and religious terms, finally, paradoxically brings nihilists and Slavophiles closer, showing the destructive consequences of their ideas (“Potok-bogatyr”).","PeriodicalId":246030,"journal":{"name":"Literaturovedcheskii Zhurnal","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121230892","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.31249/litzhur/2022.56.05
A. Ranchin
The subject of analysis in this article is the poem by Joseph Brodsky “I said fate plays a game without a score.”, first of all, his lines “I kept saying that in a light bulb the horror of floor [or: of sex], / that love, like life, is devoid of a verb”. It is shown that the lexeme “pol” connects two homonymous meanings - “lower covering, flooring in a room, in a house” and “a set of features associated with childbearing, distinguishing men and women”. It is proved that the main value is the second one. It is directly connected with the metaphysics of sex characteristic of Brodsky’s poetry and with the idea of the sexual act, depersonalizing and incapable of providing psychological and spiritual contact.
{"title":"WHY IS THERE A HORROR OF THE FLOOR/SEX IN THE LIGHT BULB? TO THE INTERPRETATION OF THE POEM BY JOSEPH BRODSKY “I SAD FATE PLAYS A GAME WITHOUT A SCORE.”","authors":"A. Ranchin","doi":"10.31249/litzhur/2022.56.05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31249/litzhur/2022.56.05","url":null,"abstract":"The subject of analysis in this article is the poem by Joseph Brodsky “I said fate plays a game without a score.”, first of all, his lines “I kept saying that in a light bulb the horror of floor [or: of sex], / that love, like life, is devoid of a verb”. It is shown that the lexeme “pol” connects two homonymous meanings - “lower covering, flooring in a room, in a house” and “a set of features associated with childbearing, distinguishing men and women”. It is proved that the main value is the second one. It is directly connected with the metaphysics of sex characteristic of Brodsky’s poetry and with the idea of the sexual act, depersonalizing and incapable of providing psychological and spiritual contact.","PeriodicalId":246030,"journal":{"name":"Literaturovedcheskii Zhurnal","volume":"252 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128709136","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.31249/litzhur/2023.59.08
{"title":"“SWORN ENEMIES”: ON THE QUESTION ABOUT THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MEREZHKOVSKII AND ROZANOV","authors":"","doi":"10.31249/litzhur/2023.59.08","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31249/litzhur/2023.59.08","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":246030,"journal":{"name":"Literaturovedcheskii Zhurnal","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128791730","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.31249/litzhur/2022.57.03
Irina M. Logvinova
The article deals with the semantics and symbolism of the square in the M.I. Tsvetaeva’s poem “Letter” (1923). It is suggested that analysis of this poem in a student audience should start with the consideration of semantics and expressions, and end with the history of compositional process in order to find out how the poetess managed to express or hide her feelings.
{"title":"SEMANTICS AND SYMBOLISM OF THE SQUARE IN THE POEM “LETTER” BY MARINA I. TSVETAEVA","authors":"Irina M. Logvinova","doi":"10.31249/litzhur/2022.57.03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31249/litzhur/2022.57.03","url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the semantics and symbolism of the square in the M.I. Tsvetaeva’s poem “Letter” (1923). It is suggested that analysis of this poem in a student audience should start with the consideration of semantics and expressions, and end with the history of compositional process in order to find out how the poetess managed to express or hide her feelings.","PeriodicalId":246030,"journal":{"name":"Literaturovedcheskii Zhurnal","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128792731","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.31249/litzhur/2023.60.07
{"title":"IRONIC PARADOXES IN A HERO OF OUR TIME","authors":"","doi":"10.31249/litzhur/2023.60.07","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31249/litzhur/2023.60.07","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":246030,"journal":{"name":"Literaturovedcheskii Zhurnal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130522076","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.31249/litzhur/2023.59.05
{"title":"“THEN THERE WAS THE ARTICLE. ARTICLE BY THE TUR BROTHERS”: AN ATTEMPT OF COMMENTARY ON ONE LINE BY M.M. BAKHTIN","authors":"","doi":"10.31249/litzhur/2023.59.05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31249/litzhur/2023.59.05","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":246030,"journal":{"name":"Literaturovedcheskii Zhurnal","volume":"10 8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116564311","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.31249/litzhur/2021.53.09
Vitaliy Makhlin
The article analyzes Bakhtin’s 1944 notes on Flaubert. Under discussion is, first, some general background of Bakhtin’s philosophical and scientific methodology as expressed in the notes, secondly, the notes themselves. Bakhtin’s views on Flaubert and the novel of the 19th century are re-presented in connection with the Russian thinker’s theories of the “grotesque realism” and “novelization”as opposed to the “ideological culture of the new times”. The article discusses some principal methodological difficulties of Bakhtinian approach to literary texts as expressed in his notes on Flaubert. In contrast to most philosophical approaches to literature, Bakhtin always treats any text, in his own expression, “in the liminal spheres” of different disciplines, that is, as both a philosopher and literary critic, a theorist and a historian of literature and culture. In these notes this specificity of the Bakhtinian methodology is expressed drastically, but in principal it is quite typical to his thinking “on the borders”. In the subsequent parts of the article Bakhtin’s approach to Flaubert’s “realism” is commented on, from the point of view of those elements of his artistic vision and his world view, which, according to Bakhtin, are not congruous with the concept of the so-called “critical realism”. These elements, Bakhtin implies, belong not so much to the classical novel of the 19th century, but, rather, to what he calls “grotesque realism” before the new times and in the 20th century. These elements are: mutual reversal of “short” and “long” (or “great” time in the images of the day, Flaubert’s artistic opposition to the “straightforwardness” of the idea of “progress” typical for the European Enlightenment and the modernity at large., the artist’s interest in the “elemental life” of human beings and animals. These and some other elements characteristic of Flaubert’s art and ideology, Bakhtin treats as if from within “creative consciousness” of the author.
{"title":"“NEXT TO GENIOUS”: G. FLAUBERT IN M.M. BAKHTIN’S THINKING","authors":"Vitaliy Makhlin","doi":"10.31249/litzhur/2021.53.09","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31249/litzhur/2021.53.09","url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes Bakhtin’s 1944 notes on Flaubert. Under discussion is, first, some general background of Bakhtin’s philosophical and scientific methodology as expressed in the notes, secondly, the notes themselves. Bakhtin’s views on Flaubert and the novel of the 19th century are re-presented in connection with the Russian thinker’s theories of the “grotesque realism” and “novelization”as opposed to the “ideological culture of the new times”. The article discusses some principal methodological difficulties of Bakhtinian approach to literary texts as expressed in his notes on Flaubert. In contrast to most philosophical approaches to literature, Bakhtin always treats any text, in his own expression, “in the liminal spheres” of different disciplines, that is, as both a philosopher and literary critic, a theorist and a historian of literature and culture. In these notes this specificity of the Bakhtinian methodology is expressed drastically, but in principal it is quite typical to his thinking “on the borders”. In the subsequent parts of the article Bakhtin’s approach to Flaubert’s “realism” is commented on, from the point of view of those elements of his artistic vision and his world view, which, according to Bakhtin, are not congruous with the concept of the so-called “critical realism”. These elements, Bakhtin implies, belong not so much to the classical novel of the 19th century, but, rather, to what he calls “grotesque realism” before the new times and in the 20th century. These elements are: mutual reversal of “short” and “long” (or “great” time in the images of the day, Flaubert’s artistic opposition to the “straightforwardness” of the idea of “progress” typical for the European Enlightenment and the modernity at large., the artist’s interest in the “elemental life” of human beings and animals. These and some other elements characteristic of Flaubert’s art and ideology, Bakhtin treats as if from within “creative consciousness” of the author.","PeriodicalId":246030,"journal":{"name":"Literaturovedcheskii Zhurnal","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123116515","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.31249/litzhur/2023.60.08
{"title":"DEATH AS AN EXISTENTIAL CATEGORY IN FEDOR TYUTCHEV’S POEMS AND LETTERS","authors":"","doi":"10.31249/litzhur/2023.60.08","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31249/litzhur/2023.60.08","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":246030,"journal":{"name":"Literaturovedcheskii Zhurnal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130775331","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.31249/litzhur/2022.55.02
N. Tsvetkova
The article deals with the civilizational approach of S.P. Shevyrev to the history and culture of Russia. In his works the philosopher and critic analyzes Russian history, literature and education in comparison with Western European ones, and comes to the conclusion about their distinctive character. The scholar considers the main task of his time to create a model of national culture, whose scope includes not only creativity, but also “spiritual production”: state and family upbringing and education. In this he supports the theory of “official nationality” by S.S. Uvarov. He assigns Pushkin and Gogol an important role in the education of the Russian man, not accepting the St Petersburg “industrial literature” by Belinsky, Bulgarin, Grech and opposing them his educational projects in the magazine “Moskvityanin”. The conclusion is that Shevyrev’s model of culture corresponds to N.Y. Danilevsky’s theory of cultural and historical types.
{"title":"MODEL OF RUSSIAN CULTURE IN S.P. SHEVYREV’S WORKS OF EARLY 1840'S","authors":"N. Tsvetkova","doi":"10.31249/litzhur/2022.55.02","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31249/litzhur/2022.55.02","url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the civilizational approach of S.P. Shevyrev to the history and culture of Russia. In his works the philosopher and critic analyzes Russian history, literature and education in comparison with Western European ones, and comes to the conclusion about their distinctive character. The scholar considers the main task of his time to create a model of national culture, whose scope includes not only creativity, but also “spiritual production”: state and family upbringing and education. In this he supports the theory of “official nationality” by S.S. Uvarov. He assigns Pushkin and Gogol an important role in the education of the Russian man, not accepting the St Petersburg “industrial literature” by Belinsky, Bulgarin, Grech and opposing them his educational projects in the magazine “Moskvityanin”. The conclusion is that Shevyrev’s model of culture corresponds to N.Y. Danilevsky’s theory of cultural and historical types.","PeriodicalId":246030,"journal":{"name":"Literaturovedcheskii Zhurnal","volume":"201 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116491638","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：