Falsification of hadiths has spread tremendously among society as the dissemination of fabricated hadiths has been normalised among the public and Islamic and religious scholars. This issue is not a new phenomenon but has been evolving since the hadiths were transmitted orally and developed through writing such as books and so on. It is also a well-known fact that hadith scholarship's contribution via writings includes written materials from the current and past Islamic and religious scholars, including Siamese scholars. This article aims to discover the authenticity of hadiths in ‘Kitab al-Nikah’ from the book of ‘Bulughul Maram min Adillat al-Ahkam’ written by al-Hafiz ibn Hajar (m. 852H). Even though al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar mentioned the majority of the sources for the hadiths, yet there are some hadiths which sources are left unmentioned. He also divided the hadiths into thematic points, although few hadiths have not been categorised under suitable themes. All of the hadiths will be analysed in terms of their authenticity, tanasub and suitability in terms of nikah. In order to identify the status and authenticity of the hadiths, a specific method will be used: takhrij (retrieval) based on the theme of the hadiths. A descriptive method will be used to analyse the hadiths in the tanasub point of view and the suitability of the hadith towards certain themes. The research showed that 86% of the hadiths found in ‘Kitab al-Nikah’ are authentic and based on authorised and muktabar books of hadiths. In addition, 95% of the hadiths chosen were relevant and suitable with the theme of nikah.
由于在公众、伊斯兰和宗教学者中传播捏造的圣训已成为常态，伪造圣训已在社会中广泛传播。这个问题不是一个新现象，而是从圣训通过口头传播和通过书籍等书面形式发展而来的。还有一个众所周知的事实是，圣训学术通过著作的贡献包括来自现在和过去的伊斯兰和宗教学者的书面材料，包括暹罗学者。本文旨在发现哈菲兹·伊本·哈贾尔(m. 852H)所著的《Bulughul Maram min Adillat al-Ahkam》一书中《Kitab al-Nikah》中圣训的真实性。尽管哈菲兹·伊本·哈贾尔提到了圣训的大部分来源，但仍有一些圣训的来源未被提及。他还将圣训分为主题点，尽管很少有圣训没有被归类在合适的主题下。所有的圣训都将根据其真实性，tanasub和nikah的适用性进行分析。为了确定圣训的地位和真实性，将使用一种特定的方法:根据圣训的主题进行检索。一种描述性的方法将被用来分析圣训在塔纳布的观点和适合的圣训对某些主题。研究表明，在Kitab al-Nikah中发现的86%的圣训是真实的，并且基于授权和穆克塔巴尔的圣训书。此外，95%的圣训都是与“尼卡”主题相关和合适的。
{"title":"Autentikasi Hadith-Hadith Kitab Al-Nikah Daripada Kitab Bulughul Maram Karya Al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar Al-Asqalani","authors":"Mohd Muhiden Abd Rahman, Mohd Bakhit Haji Ali","doi":"10.33102/jmqs.v17i2.302","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33102/jmqs.v17i2.302","url":null,"abstract":"Falsification of hadiths has spread tremendously among society as the dissemination of fabricated hadiths has been normalised among the public and Islamic and religious scholars. This issue is not a new phenomenon but has been evolving since the hadiths were transmitted orally and developed through writing such as books and so on. It is also a well-known fact that hadith scholarship's contribution via writings includes written materials from the current and past Islamic and religious scholars, including Siamese scholars. This article aims to discover the authenticity of hadiths in ‘Kitab al-Nikah’ from the book of ‘Bulughul Maram min Adillat al-Ahkam’ written by al-Hafiz ibn Hajar (m. 852H). Even though al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar mentioned the majority of the sources for the hadiths, yet there are some hadiths which sources are left unmentioned. He also divided the hadiths into thematic points, although few hadiths have not been categorised under suitable themes. All of the hadiths will be analysed in terms of their authenticity, tanasub and suitability in terms of nikah. In order to identify the status and authenticity of the hadiths, a specific method will be used: takhrij (retrieval) based on the theme of the hadiths. A descriptive method will be used to analyse the hadiths in the tanasub point of view and the suitability of the hadith towards certain themes. The research showed that 86% of the hadiths found in ‘Kitab al-Nikah’ are authentic and based on authorised and muktabar books of hadiths. In addition, 95% of the hadiths chosen were relevant and suitable with the theme of nikah.","PeriodicalId":276672,"journal":{"name":"Maʿālim al-Qurʾān wa al-Sunnah","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121839224","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abdulrahman Obeid Hussein, Adnan Mohd Abdullah Shalash
The problem statement of this research is about Imam Yassine’s thought in his reading of Islamic past and present and Western intellectual trends, and about his long experience in the field of Da’wah, as Imam Yassine urged Muslims to be capable of handling the mission of the holy Quran. It becomes more complicated with Al-Tafsir al-Minhaji as an approach to interpret the holy Quran and ease it for Muslim youth understanding in Imam Yassine’s books about thought, education, Da’wah, mysticism and civilization. This research aims to explain how Al-Tafsir al-Minhaji concerns about the method of practicing Quranic interpretation in Da’wah for Muslim Ummah renaissance. The research also aims to highlight that achieving global peace is one of main Quranic objective that Muslim thinkers are paying a great attention to its role in dialogue between variant sectarianists and theologians. Researchers followed the descriptive and inductive methods to explore Yassine’s views about peace, civilization and argumentation. Some findings of this research: Imam Yassine confirms the necessity of coincidence between the Quranic objectives and political objectives; and calls for dialogue based on Quranic objectives and its component of wisdom and dynamic argumentation, which leads to peace. To understand the fluctuation of history in the light of Quranic exegesis, Imam Yassine scrutinized the Quranic objectives of peaceful coexistence and cultural exchange.
{"title":"عالمية الدعوة القرآنية للسلام وسبل تقريبها: قراءة في التفسير المنهاجي للإمام عبد السلام ياسين","authors":"Abdulrahman Obeid Hussein, Adnan Mohd Abdullah Shalash","doi":"10.33102/jmqs.v17i2.318","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33102/jmqs.v17i2.318","url":null,"abstract":"The problem statement of this research is about Imam Yassine’s thought in his reading of Islamic past and present and Western intellectual trends, and about his long experience in the field of Da’wah, as Imam Yassine urged Muslims to be capable of handling the mission of the holy Quran. It becomes more complicated with Al-Tafsir al-Minhaji as an approach to interpret the holy Quran and ease it for Muslim youth understanding in Imam Yassine’s books about thought, education, Da’wah, mysticism and civilization. This research aims to explain how Al-Tafsir al-Minhaji concerns about the method of practicing Quranic interpretation in Da’wah for Muslim Ummah renaissance. The research also aims to highlight that achieving global peace is one of main Quranic objective that Muslim thinkers are paying a great attention to its role in dialogue between variant sectarianists and theologians. Researchers followed the descriptive and inductive methods to explore Yassine’s views about peace, civilization and argumentation. Some findings of this research: Imam Yassine confirms the necessity of coincidence between the Quranic objectives and political objectives; and calls for dialogue based on Quranic objectives and its component of wisdom and dynamic argumentation, which leads to peace. To understand the fluctuation of history in the light of Quranic exegesis, Imam Yassine scrutinized the Quranic objectives of peaceful coexistence and cultural exchange.","PeriodicalId":276672,"journal":{"name":"Maʿālim al-Qurʾān wa al-Sunnah","volume":"157 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123948281","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This research aims to compile the points of contention mentioned by Al-Hāfiz Ibn Hajar in Fath Al-Barī concerning the Tarājim (Sub-Sections) of Sahīh Al-Bukharī and his respective answers to them. The research analysis of this study begins with the chapter titled ‘The Beginning of the Revelation’ until the end of the chapter entitled ‘Faith’. The answers presented by Ibn Hajar are analysed and compared to the answers of other scholars who authored commentaries on Sahīh Al-Bukharī from those scholars who preceded him or were his contemporaries. The problem addressed in this research lies in the fact that many scholars while acknowledging the authenticity of Sahīh Al-Bukharī, its high status, the excellence and superiority of its author, did not agree with al-Bukhari in all the subsidiary issues mentioned therein. In fact, some scholars disputed or objected al-Bukhari in certain issues, stating that al Bukharī erred or assumed something wrongly. At the same time, other scholars defended al Bukharī on these issues. Hence, this research aims to study these objections and analyse them to clarify what these objections are and explain the scholars' approach in responding to them. The importance of the research is that it exemplifies an aspect of the methodology used by hadith scholars in criticising the Tarājim of books and discusses the criticisms made by these scholars and the counter responses provided. Methods employed by the researcher in this study include the inductive approach to collect the objections, the descriptive-analytical method to explain the objections and clarify the answers given by Ibn Hajar on the objections, and lastly, the comparative approach to compare the answers provided by Ibn Hajar versus other scholars. The most important results of the research are summarised in the number of objections to the Tarājim of Sahīh Al-Bukharī, which Ibn Hajar mentioned in Fath Al-Barī from the chapter titled ‘The Beginning of the Revelation’ up to the end of the chapter entitled ‘Faith’, amounting to eight (8) objections distributed amongst eight (8) Tarājim out of a total of forty-one (41) Tarjimah used in this study. These objections are divided into four categories which are: disregarding textual evidence (one objection); the negation of the existence of congruence between the Tarjamah and textual evidence (five objections); repetition of a Tarjamah (one objection); and Tarjamah strengthening an incorrect view (one objection). Ibn Hajar used a varied approach in responding to these objections, namely by combining the application of the Qur’an and the Sunnah, reason, fundamentals of jurisprudence and hadith, as well as citing statements of previous commentators.
本研究的目的是汇编Al-Hāfiz Ibn Hajar在Fath al - barji中提到的关于sah h al - bukhari的Tarājim(子章节)的争论点以及他对这些争论点的各自回答。本研究的研究分析从“启示录的开始”一章开始，直到“信仰”一章结束。我们对伊本·哈贾尔提出的答案进行了分析，并将其与其他学者的答案进行了比较，这些学者是在他之前或与他同时代的学者，他们撰写了对《布哈里》的评论。本研究要解决的问题是，许多学者在承认《布哈里圣训》的真实性、地位的崇高、作者的卓越和优越性的同时，并没有在其中提到的所有附属问题上都同意布哈里的观点。事实上，一些学者在某些问题上对布哈里提出异议或反对，认为布哈里犯了错误或假设错误。与此同时，其他学者在这些问题上为布哈尔辩护。因此，本研究旨在研究和分析这些反对意见，以澄清这些反对意见是什么，并解释学者们应对这些反对意见的方法。这项研究的重要性在于，它举例说明了圣训学者在批评Tarājim书籍时使用的方法论的一个方面，并讨论了这些学者提出的批评和提供的反驳。研究者在本研究中使用的方法包括归纳法来收集反对意见，描述分析法来解释反对意见并澄清伊本·哈贾尔对反对意见的回答，最后是比较法，将伊本·哈贾尔的回答与其他学者的回答进行比较。这项研究最重要的结果总结为对萨赫·阿尔·布哈里·Tarājim的反对意见的数量，伊本·哈贾尔在《法斯·巴尔》中提到，从“启示的开始”一章到“信仰”一章的末尾，总共有8(8)个反对意见分布在8(8)个Tarājim中，总共有41(41)个Tarjimah在这项研究中使用。这些反对意见分为四类:无视文本证据(一种反对意见);否定《圣经》与文本证据之间的一致性(五种反对意见);重复Tarjamah(一个反对意见);塔雅玛强化了一个错误的观点(一个反对意见)。伊本·哈贾尔使用了多种方法来回应这些反对意见，即结合古兰经和圣训的应用，理性，法理学和圣训的基本原理，以及引用先前评论家的陈述。
{"title":"الاعتراضات على تراجم صحيح البخاري وأجوبة الحافظ ابن حجر عنها في كتابه \"فتح الباري\": دراسة تحليلية مقارنة من أول كتاب بدء الوحي إلى آخر كتاب الإيمان","authors":"Fouad Bounama, Mohamed Maalim Adow Golo","doi":"10.33102/jmqs.v17i2.286","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33102/jmqs.v17i2.286","url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to compile the points of contention mentioned by Al-Hāfiz Ibn Hajar in Fath Al-Barī concerning the Tarājim (Sub-Sections) of Sahīh Al-Bukharī and his respective answers to them. The research analysis of this study begins with the chapter titled ‘The Beginning of the Revelation’ until the end of the chapter entitled ‘Faith’. The answers presented by Ibn Hajar are analysed and compared to the answers of other scholars who authored commentaries on Sahīh Al-Bukharī from those scholars who preceded him or were his contemporaries. The problem addressed in this research lies in the fact that many scholars while acknowledging the authenticity of Sahīh Al-Bukharī, its high status, the excellence and superiority of its author, did not agree with al-Bukhari in all the subsidiary issues mentioned therein. In fact, some scholars disputed or objected al-Bukhari in certain issues, stating that al Bukharī erred or assumed something wrongly. At the same time, other scholars defended al Bukharī on these issues. Hence, this research aims to study these objections and analyse them to clarify what these objections are and explain the scholars' approach in responding to them. The importance of the research is that it exemplifies an aspect of the methodology used by hadith scholars in criticising the Tarājim of books and discusses the criticisms made by these scholars and the counter responses provided. Methods employed by the researcher in this study include the inductive approach to collect the objections, the descriptive-analytical method to explain the objections and clarify the answers given by Ibn Hajar on the objections, and lastly, the comparative approach to compare the answers provided by Ibn Hajar versus other scholars. The most important results of the research are summarised in the number of objections to the Tarājim of Sahīh Al-Bukharī, which Ibn Hajar mentioned in Fath Al-Barī from the chapter titled ‘The Beginning of the Revelation’ up to the end of the chapter entitled ‘Faith’, amounting to eight (8) objections distributed amongst eight (8) Tarājim out of a total of forty-one (41) Tarjimah used in this study. These objections are divided into four categories which are: disregarding textual evidence (one objection); the negation of the existence of congruence between the Tarjamah and textual evidence (five objections); repetition of a Tarjamah (one objection); and Tarjamah strengthening an incorrect view (one objection). Ibn Hajar used a varied approach in responding to these objections, namely by combining the application of the Qur’an and the Sunnah, reason, fundamentals of jurisprudence and hadith, as well as citing statements of previous commentators.","PeriodicalId":276672,"journal":{"name":"Maʿālim al-Qurʾān wa al-Sunnah","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121964000","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This research deals with the comparison of symbols in the manuscripts for Al-Jami Al-Saghir on hadiths (401-430). This study deals with an important book from the hadith compilations, which is the book of Al-Jami’ Al-Saghir fi Al-Bashir Al-Nazir hadiths by al-Hafiz al-Suyuti. This book is a summary of his book al-Jami’ al-Kabir and is considered one of the most important Hadith compilation books. Al-Hafiz Al-Suyuti called this book the collection of collections in which he intended to collect the entire prophetic Sunnah (including Prophet sayings and actions). The aim of the study is to identify manuscripts of the Al-Jami Al-Saghir. The study relied on an inductive approach to the selected hadiths and a descriptive-analytical method in reading the symbols of different copies. In short, the study will compare symbols used by Al-Hafiz Al-Suyuti in explaining al-Jami’ al-Saghir because there is a difference between the symbols Al-Hafiz Al-Suyuti in selected versions. The study concluded that the percentage of agreement between the copies is 79.3%, which means the difference ratio is 20.6%. The analysis proceeds to recommend a complete comparison between all copies of the Al-Jami’ Al-Saghir of Al-Suyuti to be done within a scientific project adopted by a scientific authority or institution to reach accurate, comprehensive results, the impact of which is known as the value of the copies and the quality of the transcription.
{"title":"مقارنة رموز النسخ الخطية للجامع الصغير دراسة تأصيلية وتطبيقية على الأحاديث (401-430)","authors":"Forat Mustafa Almazloum, Kabiru Goje","doi":"10.33102/jmqs.v17i2.321","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33102/jmqs.v17i2.321","url":null,"abstract":"This research deals with the comparison of symbols in the manuscripts for Al-Jami Al-Saghir on hadiths (401-430). This study deals with an important book from the hadith compilations, which is the book of Al-Jami’ Al-Saghir fi Al-Bashir Al-Nazir hadiths by al-Hafiz al-Suyuti. This book is a summary of his book al-Jami’ al-Kabir and is considered one of the most important Hadith compilation books. Al-Hafiz Al-Suyuti called this book the collection of collections in which he intended to collect the entire prophetic Sunnah (including Prophet sayings and actions). The aim of the study is to identify manuscripts of the Al-Jami Al-Saghir. The study relied on an inductive approach to the selected hadiths and a descriptive-analytical method in reading the symbols of different copies. In short, the study will compare symbols used by Al-Hafiz Al-Suyuti in explaining al-Jami’ al-Saghir because there is a difference between the symbols Al-Hafiz Al-Suyuti in selected versions. The study concluded that the percentage of agreement between the copies is 79.3%, which means the difference ratio is 20.6%. The analysis proceeds to recommend a complete comparison between all copies of the Al-Jami’ Al-Saghir of Al-Suyuti to be done within a scientific project adopted by a scientific authority or institution to reach accurate, comprehensive results, the impact of which is known as the value of the copies and the quality of the transcription.","PeriodicalId":276672,"journal":{"name":"Maʿālim al-Qurʾān wa al-Sunnah","volume":"114 7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132010933","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This study aims to prove the importance of monotheism belief in the Holy Qurʾān as a foundation for the construction of man in general and human personality in all its mental, physical, psychological and spiritual aspects, in specific. It portrays how Islam alone can build “human civilisation” because it is divine guidance from the Creator Himself. In terms of research methodology, the researcher will mainly depend on a descriptive approach and will also rely on an inductive approach to track the texts that prove this belief. Next, these texts will be analysed using the analytical method to obtain the results. This study will find the Qur’anic verses, relevant instructions and sermons to achieve this goal. One of the most important results reached by the researcher is that the Islamic doctrine can build a balanced, integrated structure of the human personality, and this personality will lead to happiness and a balanced perspective – away from racism and intolerance. People having personalities accept and love others regardless of their colour, gender, or race. There is no doubt the positive effects of monotheism and many religious approaches in building human personality. Perhaps the most important effects are tranquillity and contentment with God’s decree. Tranquillity is a dire quality needed by humankind today – tranquillity means a person feels at peace in their heart, soul, and mind, and there is no way despair can seep into his heart.
{"title":"عقيدة التوحيد في القرآن الكريم وأثرها في البناء الإنساني","authors":"Qais Salem Al-Maaitah","doi":"10.33102/jmqs.v17i2.290","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33102/jmqs.v17i2.290","url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to prove the importance of monotheism belief in the Holy Qurʾān as a foundation for the construction of man in general and human personality in all its mental, physical, psychological and spiritual aspects, in specific. It portrays how Islam alone can build “human civilisation” because it is divine guidance from the Creator Himself. In terms of research methodology, the researcher will mainly depend on a descriptive approach and will also rely on an inductive approach to track the texts that prove this belief. Next, these texts will be analysed using the analytical method to obtain the results. This study will find the Qur’anic verses, relevant instructions and sermons to achieve this goal. One of the most important results reached by the researcher is that the Islamic doctrine can build a balanced, integrated structure of the human personality, and this personality will lead to happiness and a balanced perspective – away from racism and intolerance. People having personalities accept and love others regardless of their colour, gender, or race. There is no doubt the positive effects of monotheism and many religious approaches in building human personality. Perhaps the most important effects are tranquillity and contentment with God’s decree. Tranquillity is a dire quality needed by humankind today – tranquillity means a person feels at peace in their heart, soul, and mind, and there is no way despair can seep into his heart.","PeriodicalId":276672,"journal":{"name":"Maʿālim al-Qurʾān wa al-Sunnah","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130935629","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Khairul Anuar bin Mohamad, Sedek bin Ariffin, Mohd Zaini Zakaria
The long-serving principal of Darul Quran (DQ) who has contributed to Quranic Education in Malaysia is Dato Sallehuddin Omar. His service as the principal of DQ began from 1980 to 1993. This al-Quran figure has made a significant contribution to Quranic education since his return from Egypt in 1976 until now. The study was to look at his educational background from the primary level until he successfully obtained a bachelor’s degree. It also looks into his in-depth education in the field of Quran and Qiraat as well as his major contributions in Quranic education. Hence, his involvement in the study of the Quran is studied starting from reciting, memorizing the Quran and gaining deeper understanding in the learning of Qiraat. The study was written according to the author's interview method with this figure in several meeting sessions. In addition, it also refers to the author's interviews with some of his successful students and refers to the writings of some of his students with him during the figure's visit to their place. This study has found that Dato Sallehuddin Omar is a figure who has contributed a lot to the development of al-Quran education in Malaysia. He has proposed to the PSD to upgrade the tahfiz certificate to the Tahfiz Diploma. Apart from that, he has also made a great contribution in publishing the Mushaf Rasm Uthmani in which the address of waqf is referred to the book of Manar al-Huda.
{"title":"Sumbangan Dato' Salehuddin Bin Omar dalam Pendidikan al-Quran di Malaysia","authors":"Khairul Anuar bin Mohamad, Sedek bin Ariffin, Mohd Zaini Zakaria","doi":"10.33102/jmqs.v17i2.314","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33102/jmqs.v17i2.314","url":null,"abstract":"The long-serving principal of Darul Quran (DQ) who has contributed to Quranic Education in Malaysia is Dato Sallehuddin Omar. His service as the principal of DQ began from 1980 to 1993. This al-Quran figure has made a significant contribution to Quranic education since his return from Egypt in 1976 until now. The study was to look at his educational background from the primary level until he successfully obtained a bachelor’s degree. It also looks into his in-depth education in the field of Quran and Qiraat as well as his major contributions in Quranic education. Hence, his involvement in the study of the Quran is studied starting from reciting, memorizing the Quran and gaining deeper understanding in the learning of Qiraat. The study was written according to the author's interview method with this figure in several meeting sessions. In addition, it also refers to the author's interviews with some of his successful students and refers to the writings of some of his students with him during the figure's visit to their place. This study has found that Dato Sallehuddin Omar is a figure who has contributed a lot to the development of al-Quran education in Malaysia. He has proposed to the PSD to upgrade the tahfiz certificate to the Tahfiz Diploma. Apart from that, he has also made a great contribution in publishing the Mushaf Rasm Uthmani in which the address of waqf is referred to the book of Manar al-Huda.","PeriodicalId":276672,"journal":{"name":"Maʿālim al-Qurʾān wa al-Sunnah","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129435324","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Islamic law permitted and encouraged Muslims to benefit from ḥalāl (permissible) things. Violation of ḥalāl guidance provided in the Qurʾān contradicts with Islamic teachings. The research investigates the terminology of ḥalāl and all its derivatives in the Noble Qurʾān. The study also researches ḥalāl expressions and then extracts its legislative guidances using inductive and deductive analytical methods. The research concludes that the concept of “ḥalāl” with its various derivations is mentioned in the Qurʾān thirty-seven times in several contexts, such as talking about good things, food, fasting, marriage, divorce, inheritance, trade, pilgrimage, sacrifices, hunting, fishing, fatwas, and legislation. Among expressions related to ḥalāl are: expression of there is no sin; expression of there is “no charge a self except its capacity”; expression of ease; and expression of emergency and purity. The ḥalāl verses pointed out that: accepting Allah’s permission related to ḥalāl matters; all matters and issues in Islam are deemed to be ḥalāl unless there is a clear statement that prohibits it; enjoying the space of ḥalāl does not lead to the violation of others right; abstaining from the lawful without a legitimate justification will lead to Allah’s wrath; extravagance in the lawful is a breach to Allah’s rules; only Allah has the full authority for legislation; the permissibility of the sacrifices made by the People of the Book and marrying their chaste women, the permissibility of consuming all animals dwelling on land unless there is a clear statement that prohibits; slaughtering land animals has to be in accordance with Islamic law, the permissibility of consumption of aquatic animals, alive or dead, regardless of the period (whether during pilgrimage or not), etc.
伊斯兰教法允许并鼓励穆斯林从ḥalāl(允许的)事物中获益。违反古兰经ān中提供的指导与伊斯兰教义相矛盾。该研究调查了尊贵的古兰经ān中ḥalāl及其所有衍生词的术语。本文还对ḥalāl的表达方式进行了研究，并运用归纳和演绎的分析方法提取其立法指导意义。研究得出的结论是，“ḥalāl”这个概念及其各种衍生词在《古兰经ān》中有37次在不同的语境中被提及，比如谈论美好的事物、食物、斋戒、婚姻、离婚、继承、贸易、朝圣、祭祀、狩猎、捕鱼、教令和立法。与ḥalāl相关的表达式有:there is no sin的表达式;表达有“不收费的自我，除了它的能力”;轻松的表情;表达紧急和纯洁。ḥalāl经文指出:接受真主的许可有关ḥalāl事宜;伊斯兰教的一切事务和议题都被视为ḥalāl，除非有明确的声明禁止;享受ḥalāl的空间不会导致侵犯他人的权利;没有正当理由而不做合法的事，会招致真主的愤怒;在法律上的奢侈是违反安拉的规则的;只有安拉有立法的全权;允许圣书之民献祭，允许与贞洁的女子结婚，允许食用陆地上的所有动物，除非有明确的声明禁止;屠宰陆地动物必须符合伊斯兰教法，允许食用水生动物，无论是活的还是死的，无论在什么时期(是否在朝圣期间)等等。
{"title":"مصطلح الحلال في القرآن الكريم: دراسة موضوعية تحليلية","authors":"Bey Zekkoub Abdelali","doi":"10.33102/jmqs.v17i2.282","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33102/jmqs.v17i2.282","url":null,"abstract":"Islamic law permitted and encouraged Muslims to benefit from ḥalāl (permissible) things. Violation of ḥalāl guidance provided in the Qurʾān contradicts with Islamic teachings. The research investigates the terminology of ḥalāl and all its derivatives in the Noble Qurʾān. The study also researches ḥalāl expressions and then extracts its legislative guidances using inductive and deductive analytical methods. The research concludes that the concept of “ḥalāl” with its various derivations is mentioned in the Qurʾān thirty-seven times in several contexts, such as talking about good things, food, fasting, marriage, divorce, inheritance, trade, pilgrimage, sacrifices, hunting, fishing, fatwas, and legislation. Among expressions related to ḥalāl are: expression of there is no sin; expression of there is “no charge a self except its capacity”; expression of ease; and expression of emergency and purity. The ḥalāl verses pointed out that: accepting Allah’s permission related to ḥalāl matters; all matters and issues in Islam are deemed to be ḥalāl unless there is a clear statement that prohibits it; enjoying the space of ḥalāl does not lead to the violation of others right; abstaining from the lawful without a legitimate justification will lead to Allah’s wrath; extravagance in the lawful is a breach to Allah’s rules; only Allah has the full authority for legislation; the permissibility of the sacrifices made by the People of the Book and marrying their chaste women, the permissibility of consuming all animals dwelling on land unless there is a clear statement that prohibits; slaughtering land animals has to be in accordance with Islamic law, the permissibility of consumption of aquatic animals, alive or dead, regardless of the period (whether during pilgrimage or not), etc.","PeriodicalId":276672,"journal":{"name":"Maʿālim al-Qurʾān wa al-Sunnah","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131345867","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Adnan Moh’d Abdullah Shalash, Ragab Shehatah Mahmoud Moh’d
This study deals with the explanatory words of Imam Mubarakfuri in his book al-Rahiq al-Makhtum collection and study, and this research aims to collect the words of Mubarak's interpretation in his book Nectar Sealed and study by reference to the statements of interpreters, where the importance of the research is to add research from the interpretation of research in the books of the Prophet in this study. The researcher had followed the inductive and descriptive analytical approach, and the results of the study showed that Mubarak was able to support the historical events and the prophetic biography of the Holy Quran.
{"title":"أقوال الإمام المباركفوري التفسيرية في كتابه الرحيق المختوم جمعا ودراسة","authors":"Adnan Moh’d Abdullah Shalash, Ragab Shehatah Mahmoud Moh’d","doi":"10.33102/jmqs.v16i.249","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33102/jmqs.v16i.249","url":null,"abstract":"This study deals with the explanatory words of Imam Mubarakfuri in his book al-Rahiq al-Makhtum collection and study, and this research aims to collect the words of Mubarak's interpretation in his book Nectar Sealed and study by reference to the statements of interpreters, where the importance of the research is to add research from the interpretation of research in the books of the Prophet in this study. The researcher had followed the inductive and descriptive analytical approach, and the results of the study showed that Mubarak was able to support the historical events and the prophetic biography of the Holy Quran.","PeriodicalId":276672,"journal":{"name":"Maʿālim al-Qurʾān wa al-Sunnah","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116106515","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The hadith mawdu’i (thematic hadith) terminology is widely used in contemporary hadith discourse. However, there are confusions in understanding its true concept since several other terms are associated with it namely dirasah al-mawdhu‘iyyah min al-hadith (thematic analysis based on hadith) and sharh al-mawdhu‘i li al-hadith (thematic explanation based on hadith). As such, the purpose of this paper is to study difference opinions amongst the contemporary hadith scholars in comprehending the concept of thematic hadith that gives rise to various definition and concepts. Literature review method based on qualitative research through content analysis design were fully engaged in the data collection as well as data analysis processes. All the definitions and concept of thematic hadith presented by the contemporary hadith scholars in their academic writings were gathered and analyzed to produce a comprehensive depiction. Based on the existing definitions, the findings of this study illustrate that the present-day thematic hadith researchers’ conceptions are split into two camps. The first is the group that deduces thematic hadith as a study upon collection of hadith or upon one particular hadith with a specific theme while the second group infers thematic hadith as thematic lectures. The findings also demonstrate that the difference in understanding thematic hadith between the two groups are from the guidelines and steps in conducting a research. This is the reason why dirasah al-mawdhu‘iyyah min al-hadith is focused on the technical aspect of the initial hadith research such as takhrij (retrieval of hadith) or identifying mukhtalif (contradictions) and so on. While sharh al-mawdhu‘i li al-hadith concentrates on constructive research in depicting a clear picture of the themes that contained in the hadith. Accordingly, the integration between dirasah al-mawdhu‘iyyah min al-hadith and sharh al-mawdhu‘i li al-hadith would produce a holistic research on thematic hadith.
圣训mawdu 'i(主题圣训)术语在当代圣训话语中被广泛使用。然而，在理解它的真正概念时存在混淆，因为其他几个术语与它有关，即dirasah al-mawdhu 'iyyah min al-hadith(基于圣训的主题分析)和sharh al-mawdhu 'i li al-hadith(基于圣训的主题解释)。因此，本文的目的是研究当代圣训学者对主题圣训概念的不同理解，从而产生不同的定义和概念。基于文献综述法的定性研究，通过内容分析设计充分参与数据收集和数据分析过程。对当代圣训学者在学术著作中提出的主题圣训的所有定义和概念进行了收集和分析，以形成一个全面的描述。在对主题圣训的现有定义的基础上，本研究的结果表明，当今主题圣训研究者的概念分为两个阵营。第一类人认为主题圣训是对圣训集合的研究，或者是对某一特定主题的圣训的研究，而第二种人认为主题圣训是主题讲座。研究结果还表明，两组之间在理解主题圣训方面的差异来自于进行研究的指导方针和步骤。这就是为什么diasah al-mawdhu 'iyyah min al-hadith专注于初始圣训研究的技术方面，例如圣训检索或识别mukhtalif(矛盾)等。sharh al-mawdhu 'i li al-hadith专注于建设性的研究，以描绘圣训中包含的主题的清晰画面。因此，将diasah al-mawdhu 'iyyah min al-hadith与sharh al-mawdhu 'i li al-hadith整合起来，将产生一个主题圣训的整体研究。
{"title":"Konsep Hadith Mawdu‘i Menurut Perspektif Pengkaji Hadith Kontemporari: Antara Dirasah Al-Mawdu‘Iyyah min Al-Hadith dan Syarh Al-Mawdu‘I li Al-Hadith","authors":"Mohd Nor Adzhar Ibrahim, Roshimah Shamsudin","doi":"10.33102/JMQS.V16I1.213","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33102/JMQS.V16I1.213","url":null,"abstract":"The hadith mawdu’i (thematic hadith) terminology is widely used in contemporary hadith discourse. However, there are confusions in understanding its true concept since several other terms are associated with it namely dirasah al-mawdhu‘iyyah min al-hadith (thematic analysis based on hadith) and sharh al-mawdhu‘i li al-hadith (thematic explanation based on hadith). As such, the purpose of this paper is to study difference opinions amongst the contemporary hadith scholars in comprehending the concept of thematic hadith that gives rise to various definition and concepts. Literature review method based on qualitative research through content analysis design were fully engaged in the data collection as well as data analysis processes. All the definitions and concept of thematic hadith presented by the contemporary hadith scholars in their academic writings were gathered and analyzed to produce a comprehensive depiction. Based on the existing definitions, the findings of this study illustrate that the present-day thematic hadith researchers’ conceptions are split into two camps. The first is the group that deduces thematic hadith as a study upon collection of hadith or upon one particular hadith with a specific theme while the second group infers thematic hadith as thematic lectures. The findings also demonstrate that the difference in understanding thematic hadith between the two groups are from the guidelines and steps in conducting a research. This is the reason why dirasah al-mawdhu‘iyyah min al-hadith is focused on the technical aspect of the initial hadith research such as takhrij (retrieval of hadith) or identifying mukhtalif (contradictions) and so on. While sharh al-mawdhu‘i li al-hadith concentrates on constructive research in depicting a clear picture of the themes that contained in the hadith. Accordingly, the integration between dirasah al-mawdhu‘iyyah min al-hadith and sharh al-mawdhu‘i li al-hadith would produce a holistic research on thematic hadith.","PeriodicalId":276672,"journal":{"name":"Maʿālim al-Qurʾān wa al-Sunnah","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115037567","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The tajzi`ah (fragmentation) plays a role of quantifying the amount of reading and memorizing the Quran by juz (part or division). In classical and modern writings of Muslim scholars, there are different opinions about tajzi`ah the Quran that it has effect to printing of the Quran. Thus, this study will analyze some classical and medieval Quranic scholars’ opinions in tajzi`ah the Quran with particular reference to al-Bayan fi `Addi Ayi al-Quran of al-Dani, Jamal al-Qurra 'wa Kamal al-Iqra' of al- Sakhawi and Ghaith al-Naf 'fi al-Qira`at al-Sab' of al-Safaqusi. Subsequenly, their opinions will be compared with the current practice of the tajzi'ah in the Mushaf al-Quran printed by Mujamma’ Malik al-Fahd in Medina. This qualitative study was conducted using content analysis methods through descriptive and comparative analysis of texts in accomodating scholars’ opinions in tajzi`ah of the Quran along with the current practices in printed copy of the Quran. In this comparative analysis, most of the tajzi'ah (20 juz’) of the Mushaf Medina in accordance with those three scholars’ tajzi’ah. However, some of these tajzi’ah were not agreed by them, and the tajzi`ah of Mushaf Medina was only in agreement with one of them (9 juz’). The study also found that one tajzi`ah has not been agreed by these three scholars as the printed Mushaf Medina was not in similarity by every possible means.
tajzi 'ah(碎片)的作用是通过juz(部分或部分)来量化阅读和记忆古兰经的数量。在穆斯林学者的古典和现代著作中，对《古兰经》的tajzi 'ah对《古兰经》印刷的影响有不同的看法。因此，本研究将分析一些古典和中世纪古兰经学者对古兰经tajzi ' ah的看法，特别参考al- dani的al- bayan fi ' Addi Ayi al- qurra 'wa Kamal al- iqra '， al- Sakhawi的Jamal - qurra 'wa Kamal - iqra '和al- safaqui的Ghaith al- naf 'fi al- qira ' at al- sab '。随后，他们的意见将与麦地那的穆罕默德·马利克·法赫德(Mujamma ' Malik al-Fahd)出版的《穆沙夫·古兰经》(Mushaf al-Quran)中tajzi'ah的现行做法进行比较。本定性研究采用内容分析的方法，通过对文本的描述和比较分析，以适应学者对古兰经的tajzi ' ah的看法以及古兰经印刷本的现行做法。在这一比较分析中，大部分的tajzi'ah (20 juz ')的穆沙夫麦地那符合那三位学者的tajzi'ah。然而，其中一些tajzi ' s不被他们同意，而穆沙夫麦地那的tajzi ' s只与他们中的一个(9 juz ')一致。这项研究还发现，这三位学者没有同意一个tajzi 'ah，因为印刷的Mushaf Medina在所有可能的情况下都不相似。
{"title":"Tajzi`ah al-Quran: Kajian Terhadap Periwayatan al-Dani, al-Sakhawi dan al-Safaqusi serta Amalan Semasa Percetakan Mushaf","authors":"Abd Muhaimin Ahmad","doi":"10.33102/jmqs.v15i2.195","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33102/jmqs.v15i2.195","url":null,"abstract":"The tajzi`ah (fragmentation) plays a role of quantifying the amount of reading and memorizing the Quran by juz (part or division). In classical and modern writings of Muslim scholars, there are different opinions about tajzi`ah the Quran that it has effect to printing of the Quran. Thus, this study will analyze some classical and medieval Quranic scholars’ opinions in tajzi`ah the Quran with particular reference to al-Bayan fi `Addi Ayi al-Quran of al-Dani, Jamal al-Qurra 'wa Kamal al-Iqra' of al- Sakhawi and Ghaith al-Naf 'fi al-Qira`at al-Sab' of al-Safaqusi. Subsequenly, their opinions will be compared with the current practice of the tajzi'ah in the Mushaf al-Quran printed by Mujamma’ Malik al-Fahd in Medina. This qualitative study was conducted using content analysis methods through descriptive and comparative analysis of texts in accomodating scholars’ opinions in tajzi`ah of the Quran along with the current practices in printed copy of the Quran. In this comparative analysis, most of the tajzi'ah (20 juz’) of the Mushaf Medina in accordance with those three scholars’ tajzi’ah. However, some of these tajzi’ah were not agreed by them, and the tajzi`ah of Mushaf Medina was only in agreement with one of them (9 juz’). The study also found that one tajzi`ah has not been agreed by these three scholars as the printed Mushaf Medina was not in similarity by every possible means.","PeriodicalId":276672,"journal":{"name":"Maʿālim al-Qurʾān wa al-Sunnah","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123098244","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：