In the recent literature, increasing attention has been paid to cases when the shocks to a small number of firms would lead to large volatility in many sectors. Theorists find that supply chains play a role, as the shocks to a firm or a sector may propagate through the input–output linkages and form risks in the whole network. In this paper, we investigate the impact of risks from supply-chain variations on risk premia of the A-listed firms in the Chinese stock market from 2007 to 2021. Based on network statistics, we measure a firm's local status in the supply chains by the customer- and supplier-concentration, and its global position by the centrality. We then construct corresponding risk factors using diversified portfolios sorted according to these indices. It is found that the supply-chain positions are related to risk exposure. Firms with de-concentrated customers/suppliers have larger risk premia than concentrated firms. Moreover, with Size controlled, the firms in the center of cross-sector trade have higher risk premia than the peripheral ones. When these supply-chain factors are added to Fama and French's five-factor model with Market, Size, B/M ratio, Operating profitability, and Investment, the proportion of return variances that could be explained would increase from 51.1% to 54.9% on average.
{"title":"Supply chains and risk premia in Chinese stock market: A sorted-portfolio approach","authors":"Chao Yang, Yajun Zhao","doi":"10.1002/ise3.44","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ise3.44","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the recent literature, increasing attention has been paid to cases when the shocks to a small number of firms would lead to large volatility in many sectors. Theorists find that supply chains play a role, as the shocks to a firm or a sector may propagate through the input–output linkages and form risks in the whole network. In this paper, we investigate the impact of risks from supply-chain variations on risk premia of the A-listed firms in the Chinese stock market from 2007 to 2021. Based on network statistics, we measure a firm's local status in the supply chains by the customer- and supplier-concentration, and its global position by the centrality. We then construct corresponding risk factors using diversified portfolios sorted according to these indices. It is found that the supply-chain positions are related to risk exposure. Firms with de-concentrated customers/suppliers have larger risk premia than concentrated firms. Moreover, with Size controlled, the firms in the center of cross-sector trade have higher risk premia than the peripheral ones. When these supply-chain factors are added to Fama and French's five-factor model with Market, Size, B/M ratio, Operating profitability, and Investment, the proportion of return variances that could be explained would increase from 51.1% to 54.9% on average.</p>","PeriodicalId":29662,"journal":{"name":"International Studies of Economics","volume":"18 3","pages":"277-305"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ise3.44","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50152350","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has been China's flagship foreign policy since 2013. Perceived as an emblem of China's rising soft power, the BRI has aroused widespread research interest among academics of various disciplines. To facilitate economic studies of the BRI, the Editorial Board of this journal made a Call for Papers a year ago for a symposium on the economics of the BRI. The manuscripts finally published in this Special Issue were selected by an expedited review process from dozens of the works submitted.</p><p>According to the Chinese government's official manifesto of the BRI, the initiative “is designed to uphold the global free trade regime and the open world economy in the spirit of open regional cooperation” (National Development and Reform Commission, <span>2015</span>). The tenet is seeking mutual benefit and a conjunction of interests for cooperating partners. The Initiative is claimed to be “a global public good,” built in line with the purposes and principles of the UN Charter; open for cooperation to all countries, and international/regional organizations; harmonious and inclusive for different civilizations and nations; and abiding by market rules and international norms. It covers vast areas along Eurasian trade routes between the East Asia economic circle at one end and the European economic circle at the other.</p><p>Since its inception, the BRI has become an integral part of China's national plan for economic and social development. The 13th Five-year Plan (2016–2020) includes in it a chapter on the BRI, which specifies policies about cooperation mechanisms, economic corridors, and open and inclusive cultural exchanges (State Council, <span>2016</span>). The 14th Five-year Plan (2021–2025) also has a chapter on the BRI, which describes policies to strengthen the linkage of development strategies and policies, promote interconnectivity and interoperability of infrastructure, deepen pragmatic economic, trade, and investment cooperation, and build a bridge for mutual learning among civilizations (State Council, <span>2021</span>).</p><p>Garlick (<span>2020</span>) also concedes in his book, <i>The Impact of China's Belt and Road Initiative</i>, that “the BRI, despite its material real-world impacts such as investments and infrastructure projects, is wide open to a range of possible understandings. In fact, in a very important sense, the BRI is not one thing but is a matter of perception” (Garlick, <span>2020</span>, p. 14).</p><p>It is nevertheless evident that the BRI is first and foremost an initiative for international economic cooperation launched and led by China. For us economists, the most relevant research topics are, mainly, what the economic purposes of this Initiative are, how the BRI works, and what effects it has on international trade and investment.</p><p>The leading article in this Special Issue, “Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for the BRI Success” (Chen and Guo), presents a framework for unders
自2013年以来,“一带一路”倡议一直是中国的旗舰外交政策。“一带一路”倡议被视为中国软实力崛起的象征,引起了各学科学者的广泛研究兴趣。为促进“一带一路”经济研究,本报编委会早在一年前就举办了“一带一路”经济研讨会。最终在本期特刊上发表的手稿是从数十份提交的作品中经过快速审查选出的。根据中国政府对“一带一路”倡议的官方宣言,该倡议“旨在以开放的区域合作精神维护全球自由贸易体制和开放的世界经济”(国家发展和改革委员会,2015)。我们的宗旨是寻求互利共赢,实现合作伙伴的利益统一。“一带一路”倡议被称为“全球公共产品”,符合《联合国宪章》的宗旨和原则;向所有国家和国际/区域组织开放合作;不同文明、不同民族和谐共存;遵守市场规则和国际规范。它涵盖了一端是东亚经济圈,另一端是欧洲经济圈的欧亚贸易路线沿线的广大地区。“一带一路”倡议提出以来,已成为中国经济社会发展总体规划的重要组成部分。“十三五”规划(2016 - 2020年)中有一章是关于“一带一路”的,具体规定了合作机制、经济走廊、开放包容的文化交流等政策(国务院,2016年)。“十四五”规划(2021 - 2025)也有关于“一带一路”的章节,其中描述了加强发展战略和政策联系,促进基础设施互联互通,深化务实经贸投资合作,搭建文明互鉴之桥的政策(国务院,2021年)。Garlick(2020)在他的书《中国“一带一路”倡议的影响》中也承认,“尽管‘一带一路’倡议对投资和基础设施项目等现实世界产生了重大影响,但它对各种可能的理解都是开放的。”事实上,在一个非常重要的意义上,一带一路不是一个东西,而是一个感知问题”(Garlick, 2020,第14页)。毋庸置疑,“一带一路”首先是中国发起和引领的国际经济合作倡议。对于我们经济学家来说,最相关的研究课题主要是“一带一路”倡议的经济目的是什么,“一带一路”如何运作,以及对国际贸易和投资的影响。本期特刊的主要文章“一带一路成功的必要和充分条件”(Chen和Guo)提出了一个从经济角度理解“一带一路”的框架。本文的主要作者陈永军是一位经验丰富的经济学教授,他的职业生涯是研究和解释中国社会主义市场经济及其在区域发展、城市化和产业监管方面的特色功能。他的著作《一带一路》(An Economic Reader of the Belt and Road Initiative, Chen, 2017)为公众理解“一带一路”的经济原理提供了简明指南。他和他的合著者在这里发表的文章显示了中国经济结构的特点,即具有巨大的供应潜力,与大多数“一带一路”国家对基础设施建设的巨大需求相匹配。报告还回顾了公共政策能够创造的充分条件,以将这一潜力转化为现实,并确保“一带一路”参与者实现可持续的合作共赢。要理解“一带一路”是如何运作的,不难找出丝路基金和亚洲基础设施投资银行等明确的机构。前者是中国政府于2014年11月启动的一项国有基金,初始金额为400亿美元,旨在为“一带一路”沿线国家的基础设施、资源开发和产业合作等互联互通项目提供投融资支持(新华社,2014)。亚投行总部设在北京,中国是其发起国和主要利益相关者,是一家专注于为亚洲经济发展项目融资的多边开发银行。亚投行于2016年1月开业,共有57个创始成员国,迄今已在33个成员国的190个项目中投资364.3亿美元(AIIB, 2022)。然而,有一些不太明显但很重要的机制在起作用。本期特刊的一篇论文《中国政策性银行海外贷款是否有利于“一带一路”沿线国家?》(Chen et al.),探讨了中国国有政策性银行在“一带一路”项目融资中所扮演的角色。 通过使用国家汇总数据和交易层面的数据,作者表明,与其他中国(商业)银行的贷款相比,中国政策性银行的贷款更有可能以优惠贷款条件发放给“一带一路”国家的企业。这种差异在沿大陆路线和基础设施部门的公司中更为明显。他们的实证结果还表明,中国的政策性银行向经济表现较弱、制度质量较低、与中国政治关系较密切的国家的企业提供更多的信贷支持。“一带一路”倡议中另一个微妙的制度因素是中国共产党(CPC)组织在中国对外直接投资(OFDI)业务中的作用。本期的下一篇论文“一带一路、政治参与与中国的对外直接投资”(Ding等人)考察了“一带一路”倡议启动后,政治参与(以中共党组织成员在企业管理层中的比例衡量)对中国在“一带一路”沿线国家的对外直接投资的影响。利用2008年至2018年中国非金融上市公司的数据,作者发现,自“一带一路”倡议启动以来,中国共产党的政治参与对“一带一路”国家国有企业的并购交易和非国有企业的绿地投资产生了积极影响。有趣的是,这些积极影响在市场制度较差地区的公司/项目中更为显著。政策性银行贷款的这些特点以及中共对中国对外直接投资的政治参与的影响,引发了人们对中国在“一带一路”项目中投资的金融风险的担忧。2000年至2020年,中国政府在“一带一路”沿线投资的1200多个基础设施项目中,有近十分之一的项目失败或被推迟。本期特刊的另一篇论文《自由贸易协定如何影响中国“一带一路”基础设施项目的成功》的作者(胡、金和王)分析了这些项目的数据,发现可以通过在中国与投资项目所在国之间建立自由贸易协定(FTAs)来缓解基础设施投资风险。特别是,他们的实证研究表明,包含投资条款的“更深层次”自贸协定对降低中国在“一带一路”沿线国家基础设施项目投资失败率的效果更强。东道国的投资环境可以通过与中国的民间联系而得到改善——这在本期的下一篇论文《调查民间联系是否能促进地方经济发展:来自中国-东盟友好城市的证据》(Pang、Tang和Xie)的研究结果中得到了暗示。结合中国-东盟友好城市数据集和遥感夜间灯光数据集,作者发现经验证据表明,友好城市关系形式的民间纽带是东盟地区经济发展的关键动力,而东盟地区与中国的友好城市协议正在生效。双边贸易、中国投资项目和国家领导人的访问似乎是影响的潜在渠道。“一带一路”倡议对投资和贸易的影响是衡量其成功与否的关键。据官方统计,截至2021年底,中国已与24个“一带一路”国家共建79个经贸合作区,总投资430亿美元。共建“一带一路”的前9年,中国与“一带一路”沿线国家货物贸易额累计近11万亿美元,相互投资超过2300亿美元(Shi, 2022)。本期特刊的最后一篇论文《“一带一路”倡议的出口创造:‘给他们一条鱼’还是‘教他们吃鱼’》(Chen、Zhang和Zhao)进一步提供了“一带一路”倡议对参与国的贸易创造效应的统计证据。作者证明,与没有签署“一带一路”协议的“一带一路”国家相比,与中国签署“一带一路”协议的“一带一路”合作伙伴的出口增长了20%以上。出口创造不仅来自中国,也来自其他“一带一路”国家,没有出现非“一带一路”国家出口向“一带一路”国家转移的现象。他们的发现还证实了投资与贸易创造之间的联系。通过以上简要介绍,本期特刊的论文有助于我们理解“一带一路”倡议的经济目的、工作机制以及“一带一路”对国际贸易和投资的影响。“一带一路”倡议是当代世界经济发展中的重大事件。这期特刊的论文还有很多问题没有完成。 我们希望这些论文的发现将鼓励和启发读者在这一领域进行更多有趣和富有成效的研究。丁璐:概念化;正式的分析;写作——原稿;写
{"title":"Introduction to the Special Issue on the Economics of the Belt and Road Initiative","authors":"Ding Lu","doi":"10.1002/ise3.40","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ise3.40","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has been China's flagship foreign policy since 2013. Perceived as an emblem of China's rising soft power, the BRI has aroused widespread research interest among academics of various disciplines. To facilitate economic studies of the BRI, the Editorial Board of this journal made a Call for Papers a year ago for a symposium on the economics of the BRI. The manuscripts finally published in this Special Issue were selected by an expedited review process from dozens of the works submitted.</p><p>According to the Chinese government's official manifesto of the BRI, the initiative “is designed to uphold the global free trade regime and the open world economy in the spirit of open regional cooperation” (National Development and Reform Commission, <span>2015</span>). The tenet is seeking mutual benefit and a conjunction of interests for cooperating partners. The Initiative is claimed to be “a global public good,” built in line with the purposes and principles of the UN Charter; open for cooperation to all countries, and international/regional organizations; harmonious and inclusive for different civilizations and nations; and abiding by market rules and international norms. It covers vast areas along Eurasian trade routes between the East Asia economic circle at one end and the European economic circle at the other.</p><p>Since its inception, the BRI has become an integral part of China's national plan for economic and social development. The 13th Five-year Plan (2016–2020) includes in it a chapter on the BRI, which specifies policies about cooperation mechanisms, economic corridors, and open and inclusive cultural exchanges (State Council, <span>2016</span>). The 14th Five-year Plan (2021–2025) also has a chapter on the BRI, which describes policies to strengthen the linkage of development strategies and policies, promote interconnectivity and interoperability of infrastructure, deepen pragmatic economic, trade, and investment cooperation, and build a bridge for mutual learning among civilizations (State Council, <span>2021</span>).</p><p>Garlick (<span>2020</span>) also concedes in his book, <i>The Impact of China's Belt and Road Initiative</i>, that “the BRI, despite its material real-world impacts such as investments and infrastructure projects, is wide open to a range of possible understandings. In fact, in a very important sense, the BRI is not one thing but is a matter of perception” (Garlick, <span>2020</span>, p. 14).</p><p>It is nevertheless evident that the BRI is first and foremost an initiative for international economic cooperation launched and led by China. For us economists, the most relevant research topics are, mainly, what the economic purposes of this Initiative are, how the BRI works, and what effects it has on international trade and investment.</p><p>The leading article in this Special Issue, “Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for the BRI Success” (Chen and Guo), presents a framework for unders","PeriodicalId":29662,"journal":{"name":"International Studies of Economics","volume":"17 4","pages":"412-416"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ise3.40","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75786368","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
We use a modified die-rolling experiment to study whether negative externality affects a group's decisions about whether to cheat. Our results show that group members are less likely to lie when faced with a passive out-group player only if two members of the group share an unequal payment for lying. The less-paid party in the group plays a dominant role in the honest decision by proposing the true number more frequently in arguments for group coordination.
{"title":"Group lying with negative externality","authors":"Lan Yao, Chong Zhou","doi":"10.1002/ise3.37","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ise3.37","url":null,"abstract":"<p>We use a modified die-rolling experiment to study whether negative externality affects a group's decisions about whether to cheat. Our results show that group members are less likely to lie when faced with a passive out-group player only if two members of the group share an unequal payment for lying. The less-paid party in the group plays a dominant role in the honest decision by proposing the true number more frequently in arguments for group coordination.</p>","PeriodicalId":29662,"journal":{"name":"International Studies of Economics","volume":"18 2","pages":"184-192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ise3.37","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50124448","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Based on the input–output table and the supplier–customer data disclosed by the listed companies in China, this paper builds China's production network on both industry level and firm level. We describe the characteristics of such network using various network indexes and obtain the following results: first, China's production network on industry level is featured by “small world” and “sparsity,” and continues to become sparser. The existence of hub-like sectors makes the influence of sectoral shocks on macro fluctuations increasingly important. Second, China's production network on firm level has three types of structures: horizontal, ring, and star. Automobile and pharmaceutical industries show obvious intra-industry network cluster features. This paper aims to deepen the understanding of production network on both macro and micro levels, and provide a basis for future study on the propagation of external shocks in production networks.
{"title":"Production network: Application in China","authors":"Dianfan Yu, Rui Long, Chao Wang","doi":"10.1002/ise3.35","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ise3.35","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Based on the input–output table and the supplier–customer data disclosed by the listed companies in China, this paper builds China's production network on both industry level and firm level. We describe the characteristics of such network using various network indexes and obtain the following results: first, China's production network on industry level is featured by “small world” and “sparsity,” and continues to become sparser. The existence of hub-like sectors makes the influence of sectoral shocks on macro fluctuations increasingly important. Second, China's production network on firm level has three types of structures: horizontal, ring, and star. Automobile and pharmaceutical industries show obvious intra-industry network cluster features. This paper aims to deepen the understanding of production network on both macro and micro levels, and provide a basis for future study on the propagation of external shocks in production networks.</p>","PeriodicalId":29662,"journal":{"name":"International Studies of Economics","volume":"18 2","pages":"159-183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ise3.35","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50129394","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper presents a general theoretical framework for understanding the Belt-and-Road Initiative (BRI). We begin with an introduction to the connotations of the BRI and a review of the initiative's main achievements since its inception. From these achievements, we identify the existence of a potential match between supply and demand in jointly building the BRI to be the foremost necessary condition for win–win cooperation for participating countries. Several features of China's contemporary economic structure are shown to provide the huge potential of supply that matches the massive demand of many Belt-and-Road countries for infrastructure development. To unleash the full potential of the BRI, a series of sufficient conditions must be met so that supply and demand interact in a virtuous manner. In the first stage of jointly building the BRI, the key to turn the initiative's potential into reality is to develop the “Five Links” of policy coordination, infrastructure connectivity, unimpeded trade, financial integration, and people-to-people bond. Now that the BRI has entered the high-quality development stage, we demonstrate that China has taken or needs to work on policy measures in 10 areas to ensure the continuing and sustainable success of the BRI construction.
{"title":"Necessary and sufficient conditions for the BRI success","authors":"Yongjun Chen, Chenglong Guo","doi":"10.1002/ise3.38","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ise3.38","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper presents a general theoretical framework for understanding the Belt-and-Road Initiative (BRI). We begin with an introduction to the connotations of the BRI and a review of the initiative's main achievements since its inception. From these achievements, we identify the existence of a potential match between supply and demand in jointly building the BRI to be the foremost necessary condition for win–win cooperation for participating countries. Several features of China's contemporary economic structure are shown to provide the huge potential of supply that matches the massive demand of many Belt-and-Road countries for infrastructure development. To unleash the full potential of the BRI, a series of sufficient conditions must be met so that supply and demand interact in a virtuous manner. In the first stage of jointly building the BRI, the key to turn the initiative's potential into reality is to develop the “Five Links” of policy coordination, infrastructure connectivity, unimpeded trade, financial integration, and people-to-people bond. Now that the BRI has entered the high-quality development stage, we demonstrate that China has taken or needs to work on policy measures in 10 areas to ensure the continuing and sustainable success of the BRI construction.</p>","PeriodicalId":29662,"journal":{"name":"International Studies of Economics","volume":"17 4","pages":"417-429"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ise3.38","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84915937","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The Chinese central government recently published a new regulation to strictly limit the time minors spend on online games, providing a favorable policy environment for the protection of their physical and mental health as well as their overall development. We first provide empirical evidence that children having more frequent online entertainment would suffer worse school performance. We then adopt analytic hierarchy process to analyze the possible hazards of minors' addiction to online games from such aspects as physical health, academic performance, family relationship, and teacher–student relationship. Recommendations are finally given on how to prevent minors from being addicted to online games.
{"title":"Why do we resolutely prevent minors from indulging in online games","authors":"Moye Li, Mingxiong Zhu","doi":"10.1002/ise3.39","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ise3.39","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Chinese central government recently published a new regulation to strictly limit the time minors spend on online games, providing a favorable policy environment for the protection of their physical and mental health as well as their overall development. We first provide empirical evidence that children having more frequent online entertainment would suffer worse school performance. We then adopt analytic hierarchy process to analyze the possible hazards of minors' addiction to online games from such aspects as physical health, academic performance, family relationship, and teacher–student relationship. Recommendations are finally given on how to prevent minors from being addicted to online games.</p>","PeriodicalId":29662,"journal":{"name":"International Studies of Economics","volume":"18 1","pages":"120-134"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ise3.39","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50149473","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Whether maintaining a close relationship with China can benefit economic performance in the postpandemic era is a crucial concern for countries around the world. This study employs the difference-in-difference (DID) model and propensity score matching to estimate the impact of connecting people proposed by the Belt and Road Initiate (BRI) on the subnational economic development of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) cities. The quasi-natural experiment of DID is based on the establishment of China–ASEAN friendship cities. We capture the ASEAN subnational economic development by calibrated satellite nighttime light data. Our findings show that the establishment of a friendship-city relationship has a positive impact on the subnational economic development of China–ASEAN cities. Further analysis indicates that bilateral trade, China's direct investment in contracted projects, and mutual visits by national leaders may be the underlying channels for boosting the economic development of China–ASEAN friendship cities. This study contributes to the literature on friendship city and provides ex-ante implications on the BRI from the perspective of connecting people with first-hand empirical evidence.
{"title":"Investigating whether connecting people can promote subnational economic development: Evidence from China–ASEAN friendship cities","authors":"Fangying Pang, Jingjing Tang, Hanwen Xie","doi":"10.1002/ise3.24","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ise3.24","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Whether maintaining a close relationship with China can benefit economic performance in the postpandemic era is a crucial concern for countries around the world. This study employs the difference-in-difference (DID) model and propensity score matching to estimate the impact of connecting people proposed by the Belt and Road Initiate (BRI) on the subnational economic development of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) cities. The quasi-natural experiment of DID is based on the establishment of China–ASEAN friendship cities. We capture the ASEAN subnational economic development by calibrated satellite nighttime light data. Our findings show that the establishment of a friendship-city relationship has a positive impact on the subnational economic development of China–ASEAN cities. Further analysis indicates that bilateral trade, China's direct investment in contracted projects, and mutual visits by national leaders may be the underlying channels for boosting the economic development of China–ASEAN friendship cities. This study contributes to the literature on friendship city and provides ex-ante implications on the BRI from the perspective of connecting people with first-hand empirical evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":29662,"journal":{"name":"International Studies of Economics","volume":"17 4","pages":"499-530"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ise3.24","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72421583","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
There is an ongoing debate about whether standards act as trade catalysts or barriers. This article uses a gravity model to analyze the effects of national standards on the trade of agricultural products between China and the 64 Belt and Road (B&R) countries from 1990 to 2019. Mandatory country-specific standards have positive and significant effects on total trade, exports, and imports. Mandatory international harmonization standards have positive and significant effects on total trade and exports. Voluntary country-specific standards positively (and significantly) affect exports, while voluntary internationally harmonized standards positively (and significantly) affect total trade, exports, and imports. The magnitude of coefficients of mandatory country-specific standards is the highest, followed by mandatory internationally harmonized standards and voluntary internationally harmonized standards. It is beneficial for China and the B&R countries to strengthen standards cooperation, actively adopt international standards, and evaluate the implementation effect of standards over time.
{"title":"Catalyst or barrier? Heterogeneous effects of standards on agricultural trade between China and the Belt and Road countries","authors":"Lijuan Yang, Weigong Du","doi":"10.1002/ise3.25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ise3.25","url":null,"abstract":"<p>There is an ongoing debate about whether standards act as trade catalysts or barriers. This article uses a gravity model to analyze the effects of national standards on the trade of agricultural products between China and the 64 Belt and Road (B&R) countries from 1990 to 2019. Mandatory country-specific standards have positive and significant effects on total trade, exports, and imports. Mandatory international harmonization standards have positive and significant effects on total trade and exports. Voluntary country-specific standards positively (and significantly) affect exports, while voluntary internationally harmonized standards positively (and significantly) affect total trade, exports, and imports. The magnitude of coefficients of mandatory country-specific standards is the highest, followed by mandatory internationally harmonized standards and voluntary internationally harmonized standards. It is beneficial for China and the B&R countries to strengthen standards cooperation, actively adopt international standards, and evaluate the implementation effect of standards over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":29662,"journal":{"name":"International Studies of Economics","volume":"18 1","pages":"53-79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ise3.25","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50133244","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
We employ the data of 290 cities in China from 2006 to 2019 as a research sample and use the Multi-period DID method to test the policy shock of National E-commerce Demonstration Cities (NEDC) pilots on high-end service industry agglomeration. We find that after becoming pilot cities, the specialized agglomeration level of its high-end service industry increases by about 14.1% on average, and the diversified agglomeration level decreases by about 2.7% on average. And NEDC policy can affect the spatial agglomeration of high-end service industry through three channels: Enhancing the inclusiveness of digital finance, improving the degree of market competition, and promoting regional innovation ability. Moreover, NEDC policy has the characteristics of spatial heterogeneity. NEDC policy has a significant spillover effect on the specialized agglomeration of high-end service industry in the first-tier cities, while the second-tier cities show the characteristics of diversification dispersion. In addition, NEDC policy has a more obvious impact on the agglomeration effect of high-end service industry under the radiation and driving effect of megalopolis.
{"title":"The impact of e-commerce city pilot on the spatial agglomeration of high-end service industry in China","authors":"Xuwen Pan, Cai Zhou","doi":"10.1002/ise3.31","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ise3.31","url":null,"abstract":"<p>We employ the data of 290 cities in China from 2006 to 2019 as a research sample and use the Multi-period DID method to test the policy shock of National E-commerce Demonstration Cities (NEDC) pilots on high-end service industry agglomeration. We find that after becoming pilot cities, the specialized agglomeration level of its high-end service industry increases by about 14.1% on average, and the diversified agglomeration level decreases by about 2.7% on average. And NEDC policy can affect the spatial agglomeration of high-end service industry through three channels: Enhancing the inclusiveness of digital finance, improving the degree of market competition, and promoting regional innovation ability. Moreover, NEDC policy has the characteristics of spatial heterogeneity. NEDC policy has a significant spillover effect on the specialized agglomeration of high-end service industry in the first-tier cities, while the second-tier cities show the characteristics of diversification dispersion. In addition, NEDC policy has a more obvious impact on the agglomeration effect of high-end service industry under the radiation and driving effect of megalopolis.</p>","PeriodicalId":29662,"journal":{"name":"International Studies of Economics","volume":"18 3","pages":"326-350"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ise3.31","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50125406","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
After China launched the Belt and Road Initiative in 2013, the Chinese government has invested over 1200 infrastructure projects in countries along the Belt and Road, and nearly 10% of the projects have failed or been delayed. China has also concluded free trade agreements with many countries along the Belt and Road to reduce trade and investment barriers to promote economic and trade cooperation. This paper analyzes whether the signing of the free trade agreement (FTA) is conducive to promoting China's infrastructure investment projects’ success in the countries along the Belt and Road. We conclude that the signing of the FTA agreement is conducive to reducing the failure rate of China's infrastructure investment in the countries along the Belt and Road. For deeper FTAs, the effect is more pronounced. This paper further explores the investment provision of FTA and concludes that investment provision can improve the success rate of investment, especially if it includes provision of national treatment in the pre-establishment and the dispute settlement mechanism.
{"title":"How free trade agreement affects the success of China's Belt and Road infrastructure projects","authors":"Beibei Hu, Yuying Jin, Kai Wang","doi":"10.1002/ise3.32","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ise3.32","url":null,"abstract":"<p>After China launched the Belt and Road Initiative in 2013, the Chinese government has invested over 1200 infrastructure projects in countries along the Belt and Road, and nearly 10% of the projects have failed or been delayed. China has also concluded free trade agreements with many countries along the Belt and Road to reduce trade and investment barriers to promote economic and trade cooperation. This paper analyzes whether the signing of the free trade agreement (FTA) is conducive to promoting China's infrastructure investment projects’ success in the countries along the Belt and Road. We conclude that the signing of the FTA agreement is conducive to reducing the failure rate of China's infrastructure investment in the countries along the Belt and Road. For deeper FTAs, the effect is more pronounced. This paper further explores the investment provision of FTA and concludes that investment provision can improve the success rate of investment, especially if it includes provision of national treatment in the pre-establishment and the dispute settlement mechanism.</p>","PeriodicalId":29662,"journal":{"name":"International Studies of Economics","volume":"17 4","pages":"484-498"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ise3.32","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90569565","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}