Pub Date : 2019-02-10DOI: 10.24908/IJESJP.V6I1.12675
A. A. Pérez, E. Lleras, J. Díaz
En el este artículo presentamos un estudio de caso donde se usa el enfoque de Comunidades de Aprendizaje (CA) para propiciar un espacio de innovación dentro de una organización. En el caso se busca fortalecer el Sistema de Gestión del Conocimiento y la Innovación (SGCI) de una empresa de servicios públicos, estableciendo relaciones de aprendizaje entre los trabajadores. Es estas relaciones de aprendizaje las personas asumen roles diferenciados (de mentores o aprendices) y pueden desarrollar capacidades que les permiten proponer nuevas prácticas a la empresa.
{"title":"Comunidades de Aprendizaje como apoyo a un Sistema de Gestión del Conocimiento y la Innovación. Un estudio de Caso","authors":"A. A. Pérez, E. Lleras, J. Díaz","doi":"10.24908/IJESJP.V6I1.12675","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24908/IJESJP.V6I1.12675","url":null,"abstract":"En el este artículo presentamos un estudio de caso donde se usa el enfoque de Comunidades de Aprendizaje (CA) para propiciar un espacio de innovación dentro de una organización. En el caso se busca fortalecer el Sistema de Gestión del Conocimiento y la Innovación (SGCI) de una empresa de servicios públicos, estableciendo relaciones de aprendizaje entre los trabajadores. Es estas relaciones de aprendizaje las personas asumen roles diferenciados (de mentores o aprendices) y pueden desarrollar capacidades que les permiten proponer nuevas prácticas a la empresa.","PeriodicalId":29704,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Engineering Social Justice and Peace","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2019-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79566125","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-01-01DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-25196-3_1
C. Fehl, D. Peters, Simone Wisotzki, Jonas Wolff
{"title":"Introduction: The Role of Justice in International Cooperation and Conflict","authors":"C. Fehl, D. Peters, Simone Wisotzki, Jonas Wolff","doi":"10.1007/978-3-658-25196-3_1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25196-3_1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":29704,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Engineering Social Justice and Peace","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87794646","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-01-01DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-25196-3_11
Melanie Coni-Zimmer, A. Flohr, A. Jacobs
{"title":"Claims for Local Justice in Natural Resource Conflicts: Lessons from Peru’s Mining Sector","authors":"Melanie Coni-Zimmer, A. Flohr, A. Jacobs","doi":"10.1007/978-3-658-25196-3_11","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25196-3_11","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":29704,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Engineering Social Justice and Peace","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76610441","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-01-01DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-25196-3_2
Harald Müller
{"title":"Justice from an Interdisciplinary Perspective: The Impact of the Revolution in Human Sciences on Peace Research and International Relations","authors":"Harald Müller","doi":"10.1007/978-3-658-25196-3_2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25196-3_2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":29704,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Engineering Social Justice and Peace","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84313927","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Understanding the Puzzle of Unequal Recognition: The Case of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty","authors":"C. Fehl","doi":"10.1057/9781137464729_6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137464729_6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":29704,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Engineering Social Justice and Peace","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90851992","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-01-01DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-25196-3_6
M. Dembinski, Dirk Peters
{"title":"Institutional Justice as a Condition for the Regional Acceptance of Global Order: The African Union and the Protection of Civilians","authors":"M. Dembinski, Dirk Peters","doi":"10.1007/978-3-658-25196-3_6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25196-3_6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":29704,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Engineering Social Justice and Peace","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77754970","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-01-01DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-25196-3_5
Simone Wisotzki
{"title":"Gender Justice in Multilateral Negotiations: The Case of SGBV in the Rome Statute and in the ICC","authors":"Simone Wisotzki","doi":"10.1007/978-3-658-25196-3_5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25196-3_5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":29704,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Engineering Social Justice and Peace","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90101361","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2015-10-30DOI: 10.1163/1875984X-00704004
G. Hofmann
The norm set known as the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) remains contested. This contestation is not only driven by intentions to challenge a western-dominated international order. Rather, it has its root in an underlying conflict of justice conceptions, in which an understanding of justice as based on entitlements of individuals collides with an understanding based on the entitlements of states. The chapter develops this argument, bringing together theoretical arguments from different strands of research. Recent constructivist scholarship on norm contestation points to pre-existent norms and normative beliefs as determining actors’ perception of the legitimacy of new international norms. The English School and empirical justice research, similarly, point to collectively held ideas of justice as motives for norm contestation. Against this background and based on process tracing, qualitative content analysis, and expert interviews, the chapter analyzes the negotiations on R2P in 2005 and compares the results with the further development of R2P within the UN General Assembly. It thus illustrates that conflicts over individual vis-a-vis statist entitlements and over procedural justice remained unresolved during the emergence of R2P in 2005 and are now hampering the further evolution and implementation of the norm.
{"title":"R2P Ten Years on: Unresolved Justice Conflicts and Contestation","authors":"G. Hofmann","doi":"10.1163/1875984X-00704004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/1875984X-00704004","url":null,"abstract":"The norm set known as the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) remains contested. This contestation is not only driven by intentions to challenge a western-dominated international order. Rather, it has its root in an underlying conflict of justice conceptions, in which an understanding of justice as based on entitlements of individuals collides with an understanding based on the entitlements of states. The chapter develops this argument, bringing together theoretical arguments from different strands of research. Recent constructivist scholarship on norm contestation points to pre-existent norms and normative beliefs as determining actors’ perception of the legitimacy of new international norms. The English School and empirical justice research, similarly, point to collectively held ideas of justice as motives for norm contestation. Against this background and based on process tracing, qualitative content analysis, and expert interviews, the chapter analyzes the negotiations on R2P in 2005 and compares the results with the further development of R2P within the UN General Assembly. It thus illustrates that conflicts over individual vis-a-vis statist entitlements and over procedural justice remained unresolved during the emergence of R2P in 2005 and are now hampering the further evolution and implementation of the norm.","PeriodicalId":29704,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Engineering Social Justice and Peace","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2015-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86373513","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2014-10-15DOI: 10.1163/15718069-12341289
Arvid Bell
Resistance to negotiation and the continuation of violence dictate the course of events in the Afghanistan conflict. However, several studies have thoroughly explored the interests of the main parties to the conflict and a settlement that respects their key demands is possible. The current military situation resembles a “hurting stalemate,” which according to rationalist assumptions should compel the parties to move toward negotiations. This article argues that the main obstacle to negotiation is an underlying and unaddressed conflict of recognition between the United States, the Afghan government, and the Taliban. While each party believes it is driven by justice claims, they perceive their opponents to be driven by a hostile strategy informed by incompatible interests. Relying on the Cultural Theory of International Relations, this article explores the parties’ motives in the conflict, focusing on the need to strive for esteem and honor. It suggests that the reciprocal acknowledgement of legitimate identity-related justice claims could remove a key obstacle to formal negotiation.
{"title":"The Roadblock of Contested Recognition: Identity-Based Justice Claims as an Obstacle to Peace Negotiations in Afghanistan","authors":"Arvid Bell","doi":"10.1163/15718069-12341289","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718069-12341289","url":null,"abstract":"Resistance to negotiation and the continuation of violence dictate the course of events in the Afghanistan conflict. However, several studies have thoroughly explored the interests of the main parties to the conflict and a settlement that respects their key demands is possible. The current military situation resembles a “hurting stalemate,” which according to rationalist assumptions should compel the parties to move toward negotiations. This article argues that the main obstacle to negotiation is an underlying and unaddressed conflict of recognition between the United States, the Afghan government, and the Taliban. While each party believes it is driven by justice claims, they perceive their opponents to be driven by a hostile strategy informed by incompatible interests. Relying on the Cultural Theory of International Relations, this article explores the parties’ motives in the conflict, focusing on the need to strive for esteem and honor. It suggests that the reciprocal acknowledgement of legitimate identity-related justice claims could remove a key obstacle to formal negotiation.","PeriodicalId":29704,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Engineering Social Justice and Peace","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2014-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88178245","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2014-10-15DOI: 10.1163/15718069-12341287
Marco Fey, A. Melamud, H. Müller
Does the perceived justice or injustice of an institution affect whether states comply with its rules? There is an extensive literature that studies states’ compliance behavior. But the potential impact of justice concerns on compliance has not yet been sufficiently explored — even though justice has been demonstrated to play an important role in international negotiations and the creation of international institutions. The chapter examines the relationship between the two concepts and posits that actors’ justice considerations with a regime influence their compliance behavior. To illustrate the importance of including justice considerations in the study of compliance, we investigate West Germany’s behavior as a member of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty during the 1960–80s. West Germany had three major grievances with what it perceived as an unjust regime: The discriminatory nature of the distinction between nuclear weapon states and non-nuclear weapon states; the unequal obligations assigned to these two groups; and the disadvantages that resulted for non-nuclear weapons states from these obligations. These concerns, then, caused contested compliance and regime conflict. The case illuminates the central role of justice concerns for compliance and thus the need to broaden our understanding of compliance and its complexity in both conceptual and practical terms.
{"title":"The Role of Justice in Compliance Behavior: Germany’s Early Membership in the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Regime","authors":"Marco Fey, A. Melamud, H. Müller","doi":"10.1163/15718069-12341287","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718069-12341287","url":null,"abstract":"Does the perceived justice or injustice of an institution affect whether states comply with its rules? There is an extensive literature that studies states’ compliance behavior. But the potential impact of justice concerns on compliance has not yet been sufficiently explored — even though justice has been demonstrated to play an important role in international negotiations and the creation of international institutions. The chapter examines the relationship between the two concepts and posits that actors’ justice considerations with a regime influence their compliance behavior. To illustrate the importance of including justice considerations in the study of compliance, we investigate West Germany’s behavior as a member of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty during the 1960–80s. West Germany had three major grievances with what it perceived as an unjust regime: The discriminatory nature of the distinction between nuclear weapon states and non-nuclear weapon states; the unequal obligations assigned to these two groups; and the disadvantages that resulted for non-nuclear weapons states from these obligations. These concerns, then, caused contested compliance and regime conflict. The case illuminates the central role of justice concerns for compliance and thus the need to broaden our understanding of compliance and its complexity in both conceptual and practical terms.","PeriodicalId":29704,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Engineering Social Justice and Peace","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2014-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90767354","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：