Pub Date : 2016-02-08DOI: 10.1504/IJSSM.2015.074592
Andrey Yukhanaev, Áron Perényi, G. Fallon, Joanne Roberts
This paper sets out to contribute to the literature by investigating the institutional arrangements facing investors in Russia, the extent to which they had been reformed, and the resultant impact on the willingness of foreign-owned TNCs to commit inbound foreign direct investment (IFDI) to this high-risk transition economy. The degree to which institutional factors explain Russia's persistent underperformance in terms of IFDI is assessed through the review of the academic literature and other documentary sources. Making use of the corruption perception index, ease of doing business, world governance indicators and index of economic freedom (IEF) data, we analyse the provenance of Russia's IFDI-related institutional reforms since the late 1990s until the end of 2013. Given the international isolation of Russia after its annexation of the Crimea and the collapse of the oil price, the paper argues that in order to achieve a sustainable economic development, the Russian Government must implement substantial shifts in the design and functioning of its national institutions.
{"title":"Russian institutional development: challenges to inbound investments and implications for government policymakers","authors":"Andrey Yukhanaev, Áron Perényi, G. Fallon, Joanne Roberts","doi":"10.1504/IJSSM.2015.074592","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSM.2015.074592","url":null,"abstract":"This paper sets out to contribute to the literature by investigating the institutional arrangements facing investors in Russia, the extent to which they had been reformed, and the resultant impact on the willingness of foreign-owned TNCs to commit inbound foreign direct investment (IFDI) to this high-risk transition economy. The degree to which institutional factors explain Russia's persistent underperformance in terms of IFDI is assessed through the review of the academic literature and other documentary sources. Making use of the corruption perception index, ease of doing business, world governance indicators and index of economic freedom (IEF) data, we analyse the provenance of Russia's IFDI-related institutional reforms since the late 1990s until the end of 2013. Given the international isolation of Russia after its annexation of the Crimea and the collapse of the oil price, the paper argues that in order to achieve a sustainable economic development, the Russian Government must implement substantial shifts in the design and functioning of its national institutions.","PeriodicalId":319298,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sustainable Strategic Management","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125960737","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2015-07-31DOI: 10.1504/ijssm.2014.070845
Simon Hauser
This study of the shale gas production industry in the North-Eastern USA empirically tests the role organisational characteristics, such as firm environmental record and public visibility, play in influencing the level of pressure placed on these firms by institutional stakeholders for a more sustainable approach to their development activities. To my knowledge, no prior study explored the role of these organisational characteristics; their influence has so far only been stipulated in theoretical arguments in the organisational business literature. The research design integrates data obtained from company databases, publicly available firm documents and websites, violations data, as well as online regional news sources. Findings indicate that publicly reported environmental indiscretions as well as increased public visibility lead companies to more broadly recognise institutional stakeholders including non-governmental organisations (NGOs), regulators, the media, industry groups, competitors and local communities. However, a somewhat unexpected result was that companies with fewer regulatory violations acknowledge more institutional stakeholders.
{"title":"Organisational characteristics as determinants of the level of institutional stakeholder pressure for sustainable development in the natural gas exploration and production industry","authors":"Simon Hauser","doi":"10.1504/ijssm.2014.070845","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijssm.2014.070845","url":null,"abstract":"This study of the shale gas production industry in the North-Eastern USA empirically tests the role organisational characteristics, such as firm environmental record and public visibility, play in influencing the level of pressure placed on these firms by institutional stakeholders for a more sustainable approach to their development activities. To my knowledge, no prior study explored the role of these organisational characteristics; their influence has so far only been stipulated in theoretical arguments in the organisational business literature. The research design integrates data obtained from company databases, publicly available firm documents and websites, violations data, as well as online regional news sources. Findings indicate that publicly reported environmental indiscretions as well as increased public visibility lead companies to more broadly recognise institutional stakeholders including non-governmental organisations (NGOs), regulators, the media, industry groups, competitors and local communities. However, a somewhat unexpected result was that companies with fewer regulatory violations acknowledge more institutional stakeholders.","PeriodicalId":319298,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sustainable Strategic Management","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117240086","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2015-07-31DOI: 10.1504/ijssm.2014.070855
H. Madsen, Anne Ellerup Nielsen, Christa Thomsen, John P. UlhÁ¸i
From a strategic point of view it makes good sense for companies to respond to concerns and stakes espoused by key holders - also in relation to environmental issues. Thus, it is relevant to identify patterns in company's perception of these behavioural drivers and how they try to influence stakeholders when communicating their environmental concern. This is the focus of this paper based on data from two different studies: 1) a questionnaire-based survey distributed to a sample of industrial companies in Denmark in 1995, 1999, 2003, 2007 and 2011 focusing on their response to the environmental challenge; 2) an interview-based study of CSR activities in Danish SMEs in 2007. The paper concludes that despite the apparent strategic attractiveness of self-regulation, the major influence on environmental related behaviour in SMEs seems to originate from stakeholders representing regulatory factors and they tend not to communicate strategically about their activities.
{"title":"Do SMEs perceive environmental aspects of sustainability as a strategic issue","authors":"H. Madsen, Anne Ellerup Nielsen, Christa Thomsen, John P. UlhÁ¸i","doi":"10.1504/ijssm.2014.070855","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijssm.2014.070855","url":null,"abstract":"From a strategic point of view it makes good sense for companies to respond to concerns and stakes espoused by key holders - also in relation to environmental issues. Thus, it is relevant to identify patterns in company's perception of these behavioural drivers and how they try to influence stakeholders when communicating their environmental concern. This is the focus of this paper based on data from two different studies: 1) a questionnaire-based survey distributed to a sample of industrial companies in Denmark in 1995, 1999, 2003, 2007 and 2011 focusing on their response to the environmental challenge; 2) an interview-based study of CSR activities in Danish SMEs in 2007. The paper concludes that despite the apparent strategic attractiveness of self-regulation, the major influence on environmental related behaviour in SMEs seems to originate from stakeholders representing regulatory factors and they tend not to communicate strategically about their activities.","PeriodicalId":319298,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sustainable Strategic Management","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132333125","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2015-07-31DOI: 10.1504/ijssm.2014.070843
Praveen Goyal, Z. Rahman
The purpose of the present study is to conduct a review of the literature on the relation between corporate sustainability performance and firm performance. In this study corporate sustainability performance and firm performance measurement has been divided into different categories. Only empirical studies have been selected for the review. Research articles are classified based on certain measurement categories. Findings of this study suggest a positive relation between corporate sustainability performance and firm performance. Firm size and industry are the control variables used by the maximum number of studies. The results of the study support the fact of doing well pay well. The association between corporate sustainability performance and firm performance is an issue of ongoing debate among scholars and practitioners. This debate is supported by various ethical, religious, and emotional facts. The importance of this issue is major driven power of the empirical studies in this field of research. The positive relation between corporate sustainability performance and firm performance may be an important motivating factor for the practitioners to contribute more towards sustainable development. Results of this study will help both practitioners and academicians those are conducting research in the field of corporate sustainability performance measurement.
{"title":"Corporate sustainability performance and firm performance association: a literature review","authors":"Praveen Goyal, Z. Rahman","doi":"10.1504/ijssm.2014.070843","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijssm.2014.070843","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the present study is to conduct a review of the literature on the relation between corporate sustainability performance and firm performance. In this study corporate sustainability performance and firm performance measurement has been divided into different categories. Only empirical studies have been selected for the review. Research articles are classified based on certain measurement categories. Findings of this study suggest a positive relation between corporate sustainability performance and firm performance. Firm size and industry are the control variables used by the maximum number of studies. The results of the study support the fact of doing well pay well. The association between corporate sustainability performance and firm performance is an issue of ongoing debate among scholars and practitioners. This debate is supported by various ethical, religious, and emotional facts. The importance of this issue is major driven power of the empirical studies in this field of research. The positive relation between corporate sustainability performance and firm performance may be an important motivating factor for the practitioners to contribute more towards sustainable development. Results of this study will help both practitioners and academicians those are conducting research in the field of corporate sustainability performance measurement.","PeriodicalId":319298,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sustainable Strategic Management","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125037836","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2015-07-31DOI: 10.1504/IJSSM.2014.070856
N. Vihari, M. Rao
The increasing interest in both practice and scholarship is facilitating the ongoing research on corporate sustainability. The aim of this paper is to investigate the influence of organisational ambexterity (OA) and organisational change for sustainability (OCS) in achieving corporate sustainability (CS) and in turn contributing to the organisational effectiveness. In addition to the above mentioned direct relationships, the study further explores the interaction effects of the moderating variables such as employee integration (EI) and resource endowments (RE). The study is undertaken in the context of select pharmaceutical companies in India with a sample size of 245 respondents. Structural equation modelling was used as a method for the statistical validation of the latent constructs. The key finding of the study reveals that OA, OCS significantly predicts and also explains the variability of the latent constructs CS and OE.
{"title":"Effects of organisational ambidexterity and change for sustainability on organisational effectiveness: empirical evidence from India","authors":"N. Vihari, M. Rao","doi":"10.1504/IJSSM.2014.070856","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSM.2014.070856","url":null,"abstract":"The increasing interest in both practice and scholarship is facilitating the ongoing research on corporate sustainability. The aim of this paper is to investigate the influence of organisational ambexterity (OA) and organisational change for sustainability (OCS) in achieving corporate sustainability (CS) and in turn contributing to the organisational effectiveness. In addition to the above mentioned direct relationships, the study further explores the interaction effects of the moderating variables such as employee integration (EI) and resource endowments (RE). The study is undertaken in the context of select pharmaceutical companies in India with a sample size of 245 respondents. Structural equation modelling was used as a method for the statistical validation of the latent constructs. The key finding of the study reveals that OA, OCS significantly predicts and also explains the variability of the latent constructs CS and OE.","PeriodicalId":319298,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sustainable Strategic Management","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128330233","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2015-07-31DOI: 10.1504/IJSSM.2014.070857
B. K. Verma, S. Sangle
Pollution prevention strategy is considered as the first strategy to be implemented to deliver sustainable value to achieve cost advantages and reduced exposure to litigation risk in shorter term. The paper presents the detailed empirical study of 60 Indian firms which have implemented this strategy. These firms are chosen from several industrial sectors responsible to deteriorating condition of natural environment. This work helps to identify attributes of innovative capability as complementary assets of an organisation to implement this strategy successfully. The result shows that 'business process' innovativeness and 'behavioural' innovativeness characteristics of innovative capability are required by firms to successfully implement pollution prevention strategy. Development of these traits shall initiate a firm on path of sustainability to deliver sustainable value and to prepare them well against its competitors of industry. Based on the research findings, the paper proposes some important managerial implications to grab the 'low hanging fruit' of pollution prevention strategy.
{"title":"Complementary assets for effective pollution prevention strategy","authors":"B. K. Verma, S. Sangle","doi":"10.1504/IJSSM.2014.070857","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSM.2014.070857","url":null,"abstract":"Pollution prevention strategy is considered as the first strategy to be implemented to deliver sustainable value to achieve cost advantages and reduced exposure to litigation risk in shorter term. The paper presents the detailed empirical study of 60 Indian firms which have implemented this strategy. These firms are chosen from several industrial sectors responsible to deteriorating condition of natural environment. This work helps to identify attributes of innovative capability as complementary assets of an organisation to implement this strategy successfully. The result shows that 'business process' innovativeness and 'behavioural' innovativeness characteristics of innovative capability are required by firms to successfully implement pollution prevention strategy. Development of these traits shall initiate a firm on path of sustainability to deliver sustainable value and to prepare them well against its competitors of industry. Based on the research findings, the paper proposes some important managerial implications to grab the 'low hanging fruit' of pollution prevention strategy.","PeriodicalId":319298,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sustainable Strategic Management","volume":"146 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122285629","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2014-08-20DOI: 10.1504/IJSSM.2014.064351
Donald L. Lester, Michael L. Menefee
Offshore outsourcing has become a primary tool to gain a competitive edge in almost every sector of the global environment, including for-profit and not-for-profit enterprises. An alternative to offshore outsourcing known as rural sourcing has begun to gain traction, particularly in the USA. This new model is chronicled in a non-profit, governmental arena, where the North Carolina Division of Motor Vehicles has successfully transitioned its 100-employee call centre from a metropolitan area to a rural area.
{"title":"Rural sourcing in North Carolina: promoting economic sustainability","authors":"Donald L. Lester, Michael L. Menefee","doi":"10.1504/IJSSM.2014.064351","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSM.2014.064351","url":null,"abstract":"Offshore outsourcing has become a primary tool to gain a competitive edge in almost every sector of the global environment, including for-profit and not-for-profit enterprises. An alternative to offshore outsourcing known as rural sourcing has begun to gain traction, particularly in the USA. This new model is chronicled in a non-profit, governmental arena, where the North Carolina Division of Motor Vehicles has successfully transitioned its 100-employee call centre from a metropolitan area to a rural area.","PeriodicalId":319298,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sustainable Strategic Management","volume":"246 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115003679","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2014-08-20DOI: 10.1504/IJSSM.2014.064357
Kimberly K. Whitehead
The recent flurry of sustainable development activity gives researchers an unparalleled opportunity to explore a sweeping societal phenomenon and its complex implications to the firm. This paper addresses the factors that contribute to intrafirm complexity such that they inhibit the execution of sustainable development initiatives. Unlike other papers, this research goes beyond simply analysing the adoption of sustainable development. This paper uses the perspective and actions of individuals to address the barriers that forestall the execution of sustainable development initiatives in the day-to-day operations of the firm. Through the application of the legitimacy judgment cycle, the paper develops nine propositions that address these barriers. Using published case studies for illustration and support, this paper provides researchers propositions that can be studied empirically and provides practitioners managerial implications that can assist in the day-to-day operations of the firm.
{"title":"Sustainable development: legitimisation to internalisation","authors":"Kimberly K. Whitehead","doi":"10.1504/IJSSM.2014.064357","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSM.2014.064357","url":null,"abstract":"The recent flurry of sustainable development activity gives researchers an unparalleled opportunity to explore a sweeping societal phenomenon and its complex implications to the firm. This paper addresses the factors that contribute to intrafirm complexity such that they inhibit the execution of sustainable development initiatives. Unlike other papers, this research goes beyond simply analysing the adoption of sustainable development. This paper uses the perspective and actions of individuals to address the barriers that forestall the execution of sustainable development initiatives in the day-to-day operations of the firm. Through the application of the legitimacy judgment cycle, the paper develops nine propositions that address these barriers. Using published case studies for illustration and support, this paper provides researchers propositions that can be studied empirically and provides practitioners managerial implications that can assist in the day-to-day operations of the firm.","PeriodicalId":319298,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sustainable Strategic Management","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126823791","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2014-08-20DOI: 10.1504/IJSSM.2014.064355
Joel I. Harmon, Kent D. Fairfield
Organisations around the world are increasingly factoring in environmental and social demands as they strive to achieve enduring success beyond near-term financial returns. Only partially understood are the ways that organisations manage sustainability based on geographic location and multinational standardisation. This study analysed a worldwide survey of managers (N = 1,514) to compare across borders their perceptions of sustainability-related external influences, internal inhibitors, internal enabling factors, decision drivers, practices, and operating performance. Guided by an existing integrative model combining these factors, this paper analysed variation across geographic region, country-wide sustainability conditions, and level of economic development. Corporate sustainability motives, practices, and benefits do vary significantly across geographic contexts, but organisation size and strategy of operating as a national, multi-local, or global firm make an even bigger difference. Further research is suggested to deepen these findings.
{"title":"Relative effect of geographic context and international strategic approach on sustainability management","authors":"Joel I. Harmon, Kent D. Fairfield","doi":"10.1504/IJSSM.2014.064355","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSM.2014.064355","url":null,"abstract":"Organisations around the world are increasingly factoring in environmental and social demands as they strive to achieve enduring success beyond near-term financial returns. Only partially understood are the ways that organisations manage sustainability based on geographic location and multinational standardisation. This study analysed a worldwide survey of managers (N = 1,514) to compare across borders their perceptions of sustainability-related external influences, internal inhibitors, internal enabling factors, decision drivers, practices, and operating performance. Guided by an existing integrative model combining these factors, this paper analysed variation across geographic region, country-wide sustainability conditions, and level of economic development. Corporate sustainability motives, practices, and benefits do vary significantly across geographic contexts, but organisation size and strategy of operating as a national, multi-local, or global firm make an even bigger difference. Further research is suggested to deepen these findings.","PeriodicalId":319298,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sustainable Strategic Management","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130063014","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2014-08-20DOI: 10.1504/IJSSM.2014.064350
A. Gabriel, J. Nathwani
The balance between reasonable return on investment and long-term organisational viability has fuelled a significant amount of research to evaluate the effectiveness of corporate sustainability strategies. Several factors influence the relationship between a firm’s performance and its sustainable development strategies, and there is no clear ‘line of sight’ between performance and strategic behaviour. Most theoretical attempts to describe the relationship have concluded that there is insufficient evidence to produce robust conclusions for general guidance. Using a meta-analysis methodology, this article evaluates the aggregated performance outcomes of different corporate sustainability strategies that draw on data from 18 studies and more than 20,000 firms. The findings indicate a medium to strong positive relationship between sustainability-oriented strategies and a firm’s ‘triple bottom line’. Additionally, proactive sustainability-oriented strategies tend to result in higher payoff.
{"title":"Linkage between firm’s sustainability strategies and corporate performance: a meta-analysis of global studies","authors":"A. Gabriel, J. Nathwani","doi":"10.1504/IJSSM.2014.064350","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSM.2014.064350","url":null,"abstract":"The balance between reasonable return on investment and long-term organisational viability has fuelled a significant amount of research to evaluate the effectiveness of corporate sustainability strategies. Several factors influence the relationship between a firm’s performance and its sustainable development strategies, and there is no clear ‘line of sight’ between performance and strategic behaviour. Most theoretical attempts to describe the relationship have concluded that there is insufficient evidence to produce robust conclusions for general guidance. Using a meta-analysis methodology, this article evaluates the aggregated performance outcomes of different corporate sustainability strategies that draw on data from 18 studies and more than 20,000 firms. The findings indicate a medium to strong positive relationship between sustainability-oriented strategies and a firm’s ‘triple bottom line’. Additionally, proactive sustainability-oriented strategies tend to result in higher payoff.","PeriodicalId":319298,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sustainable Strategic Management","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129281039","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：