Alba De Agustin Camacho, W. Van Petegem, Mieke De Droog, Lies Jacobs
Citizen science (CS) is a diverse practice, with projects emphasizing scientific and/or democratization goals. While the integration of both goals is advocated for sustainability transitions, this implies contextualized methodological choices. This contribution presents an instrument to explore methodological choices in relation to project goals and context, linking these patterns to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). By way of a PRISMA scoping review, case studies implemented in the Global North (GN) or Global South (GS) were selected and categorized using the instrument to identify notable patterns. GN projects are generally published by GN authors and can predominantly be linked to productivity goals relating to SDGs on biodiversity (SDGs 14, 15). In contrast, GS projects are commonly associated with diverse co-author groups that focus on democratization and/or productivity, and prioritize SDGs on agriculture, health, sustainable communities, and climate change (SDGs 2, 3, 11, 13). The analyzed case studies could contribute directly to three SDG indicators and indirectly to 22. Methodological choices regarding project goals and themes translate into variations in participant selection and recruitment, contribution types, and project outcomes. Further, project design and outcomes can be linked to co-authorships, with larger teams typically associated with co-created projects which in turn focus on democratization or democratization and productivity goals, and produce a wide diversity of outcomes. Qualitative information extracted from the investigated papers was used to contextualize the relevance of combining productivity and democratization goals as well as the related challenges of harmonizing different interests and of resource limitations as well as other project constraints.
{"title":"Context – Goal – Method – Outcome: Alignment in Citizen Science Project Design and its Relation to Supporting the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals","authors":"Alba De Agustin Camacho, W. Van Petegem, Mieke De Droog, Lies Jacobs","doi":"10.5334/cstp.570","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.570","url":null,"abstract":"Citizen science (CS) is a diverse practice, with projects emphasizing scientific and/or democratization goals. While the integration of both goals is advocated for sustainability transitions, this implies contextualized methodological choices.\u0000This contribution presents an instrument to explore methodological choices in relation to project goals and context, linking these patterns to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). By way of a PRISMA scoping review, case studies implemented in the Global North (GN) or Global South (GS) were selected and categorized using the instrument to identify notable patterns. GN projects are generally published by GN authors and can predominantly be linked to productivity goals relating to SDGs on biodiversity (SDGs 14, 15). In contrast, GS projects are commonly associated with diverse co-author groups that focus on democratization and/or productivity, and prioritize SDGs on agriculture, health, sustainable communities, and climate change (SDGs 2, 3, 11, 13). The analyzed case studies could contribute directly to three SDG indicators and indirectly to 22.\u0000Methodological choices regarding project goals and themes translate into variations in participant selection and recruitment, contribution types, and project outcomes. Further, project design and outcomes can be linked to co-authorships, with larger teams typically associated with co-created projects which in turn focus on democratization or democratization and productivity goals, and produce a wide diversity of outcomes.\u0000Qualitative information extracted from the investigated papers was used to contextualize the relevance of combining productivity and democratization goals as well as the related challenges of harmonizing different interests and of resource limitations as well as other project constraints.","PeriodicalId":32270,"journal":{"name":"Citizen Science Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46427988","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Poppy Lakeman Fraser, L. Colucci-Gray, Annie Robinson, A. Sforzi, Ruth Staples-Rolfe, J. Newman, Richard Gill, Nirwan Sharma, Stefan Rueger, Advaith Siddharthan
As the citizen science (CS) community flourishes, there is an opportunity to reflect on how practitioners can widen participation and work with participants as co-researchers to investigate and take action around global challenges. Through the lens of one CS case study, the X-Polli:Nation project, we report on how technologists, ecologists, and education specialists repurposed older projects by cross-pollinating ideas with children and teachers in the UK and in Italy to create Artificial Intelligence–enhanced tools appropriate for teaching sustainability in schools. Taking part in an actionable CS cycle, children learn about pollinating insects, record scientific data, create flowering habitats, and communicate their importance. Through this process, X-Polli:Nation demonstrates relevance across a number of Sustainable Development Goals (e.g., SDG 4, Quality Education; SDG 10, Reducing Inequality; and SDG 15, Life on Land), and applies the underlying SDG principle “leave no one behind.” We go on to investigate if, and how, young people would like to deepen their engagement with the SDGs, and we report that taking action and communicating the importance of the SDGs were of paramount interest. The challenge of building sustainability into an already crowded curriculum can be alleviated by understanding its value, considering the audience, and adapting to new contexts. The considerable benefits include raising awareness about global sustainability issues and giving children the confidence to become passionate environmental stewards, all the while extending the life of older projects and thus making CS methods sustainable too.
{"title":"X-Polli:Nation: Contributing Towards Sustainable Development Goals Through School-Based Pollinator Citizen Science","authors":"Poppy Lakeman Fraser, L. Colucci-Gray, Annie Robinson, A. Sforzi, Ruth Staples-Rolfe, J. Newman, Richard Gill, Nirwan Sharma, Stefan Rueger, Advaith Siddharthan","doi":"10.5334/cstp.567","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.567","url":null,"abstract":"As the citizen science (CS) community flourishes, there is an opportunity to reflect on how practitioners can widen participation and work with participants as co-researchers to investigate and take action around global challenges. Through the lens of one CS case study, the X-Polli:Nation project, we report on how technologists, ecologists, and education specialists repurposed older projects by cross-pollinating ideas with children and teachers in the UK and in Italy to create Artificial Intelligence–enhanced tools appropriate for teaching sustainability in schools. Taking part in an actionable CS cycle, children learn about pollinating insects, record scientific data, create flowering habitats, and communicate their importance. Through this process, X-Polli:Nation demonstrates relevance across a number of Sustainable Development Goals (e.g., SDG 4, Quality Education; SDG 10, Reducing Inequality; and SDG 15, Life on Land), and applies the underlying SDG principle “leave no one behind.” We go on to investigate if, and how, young people would like to deepen their engagement with the SDGs, and we report that taking action and communicating the importance of the SDGs were of paramount interest. The challenge of building sustainability into an already crowded curriculum can be alleviated by understanding its value, considering the audience, and adapting to new contexts. The considerable benefits include raising awareness about global sustainability issues and giving children the confidence to become passionate environmental stewards, all the while extending the life of older projects and thus making CS methods sustainable too.","PeriodicalId":32270,"journal":{"name":"Citizen Science Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47078812","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sonja Grossberndt, Geir Graff, A. Bartoňová, Iuliia Volchkova, Thomas Evensen
In order to measure progress towards the aims outlined by the United Nations (UN) 2030 Agenda, data are needed for the different indicators that are linked to each UN Sustainable Development Goal (SDG). Where statistical or scientific data are not sufficient or available, alternative data sources, such as data from citizen science (CS) activities, could be used. Statistics Norway, together with the Norwegian Association of Local and Regional Authorities, have developed a taxonomy for classifying indicators that are intended to measure the SDGs. The purpose of this taxonomy is to sort, evaluate, and compare different SDG indicators and to assess their usefulness by identifying their central properties and characteristics. This is done by organizing central characteristics under the three dimensions of Goal, Perspective, and Quality. The taxonomy is designed in a way that can help users to find the right indicators across sectors to measure progress towards the SDGs depending on their own context and strategic priorities. The Norwegian taxonomy also offers new opportunities for the re-use of data collected through CS activities. This paper presents the taxonomy and demonstrates how it can be applied for an indicator based on a CS data set, and we also suggest further use of CS data.
{"title":"Organizing the Indicator Zoo: Can a New Taxonomy Make It Easier for Citizen Science Data to Contribute to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal Indicators?","authors":"Sonja Grossberndt, Geir Graff, A. Bartoňová, Iuliia Volchkova, Thomas Evensen","doi":"10.5334/cstp.580","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.580","url":null,"abstract":"In order to measure progress towards the aims outlined by the United Nations (UN) 2030 Agenda, data are needed for the different indicators that are linked to each UN Sustainable Development Goal (SDG). Where statistical or scientific data are not sufficient or available, alternative data sources, such as data from citizen science (CS) activities, could be used.\u0000Statistics Norway, together with the Norwegian Association of Local and Regional Authorities, have developed a taxonomy for classifying indicators that are intended to measure the SDGs. The purpose of this taxonomy is to sort, evaluate, and compare different SDG indicators and to assess their usefulness by identifying their central properties and characteristics. This is done by organizing central characteristics under the three dimensions of Goal, Perspective, and Quality. The taxonomy is designed in a way that can help users to find the right indicators across sectors to measure progress towards the SDGs depending on their own context and strategic priorities. The Norwegian taxonomy also offers new opportunities for the re-use of data collected through CS activities. This paper presents the taxonomy and demonstrates how it can be applied for an indicator based on a CS data set, and we also suggest further use of CS data.","PeriodicalId":32270,"journal":{"name":"Citizen Science Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46884869","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
S. Bieszczad, Maximilian Fochler, R. Brodschneider
The mission and definition of citizen science are vividly debated. One of the crucial aspects contested is who has the agency to define it; another is how precise a definition can and should be and how much these definitions are reflective of the heterogeneity of practices and perspectives subsumed under the label citizen science. In this paper we draw attention to how citizens themselves actively construct their own roles within a project in relation to both their histories and the project’s scientists. Drawing on a set of in-depth interviews with participating Austrian beekeepers in the INSIGNIA project, we show how even within a small, relatively homogenous sample of participants, there is considerable diversity in how the citizen scientists see their roles. We explore how citizen scientists articulate a different set of relations towards science, their own practice as beekeepers, and their desired role in the project. In conclusion, we discuss the implications of our findings for academic reflection on citizen science as well as practical implementation for citizen science projects.
{"title":"How Citizen Scientists See their Own Role and Expertise: An Explorative Study of the Perspectives of Beekeepers in a Citizen Science Project","authors":"S. Bieszczad, Maximilian Fochler, R. Brodschneider","doi":"10.5334/cstp.501","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.501","url":null,"abstract":"The mission and definition of citizen science are vividly debated. One of the crucial aspects contested is who has the agency to define it; another is how precise a definition can and should be and how much these definitions are reflective of the heterogeneity of practices and perspectives subsumed under the label citizen science. In this paper we draw attention to how citizens themselves actively construct their own roles within a project in relation to both their histories and the project’s scientists. Drawing on a set of in-depth interviews with participating Austrian beekeepers in the INSIGNIA project, we show how even within a small, relatively homogenous sample of participants, there is considerable diversity in how the citizen scientists see their roles. We explore how citizen scientists articulate a different set of relations towards science, their own practice as beekeepers, and their desired role in the project. In conclusion, we discuss the implications of our findings for academic reflection on citizen science as well as practical implementation for citizen science projects.","PeriodicalId":32270,"journal":{"name":"Citizen Science Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42950545","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Citizen science has potential to provide multiple benefits to participants and the professional scientific community, and those benefits can be realized if citizen science projects are intentionally designed to achieve research objectives, and if participants have the skills, knowledge, and training to collect high-quality data. Using three years of data from a citizen science bird monitoring project in Salt Lake City, Utah, we assessed bird songs and calls learned by volunteers, and compared species detections, number of birds, and distance measurements between point counts by citizen scientists and professional biologists. We found significant increases in correct species identification for citizen scientists after going through the training program; the average percentage of bird songs and calls identified rose from 42.5% before training to 72.7% after training (p < 0.00001). For two data quality metrics, citizen scientists and professional biologists collected similar quality data: the average number of birds and average detection distances were not significantly different for point counts conducted by citizen scientists and professional biologists in the same locations. However, professional biologists identified an average of 1.48 more species than citizen scientists (p < 0.00001). Our findings emphasize the importance of evaluating training programs and data accuracy for citizen science projects. In instances in which citizen scientists may not be performing at the same level as professional biologists, identifying these patterns ensures that they can be fully explained and accounted for during data analysis.
{"title":"Evaluating Data Quality and Changes in Species Identification in a Citizen Science Bird Monitoring Project","authors":"Cooper M. Farr, Frances Ngo, Bryant Olsen","doi":"10.5334/cstp.604","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.604","url":null,"abstract":"Citizen science has potential to provide multiple benefits to participants and the professional scientific community, and those benefits can be realized if citizen science projects are intentionally designed to achieve research objectives, and if participants have the skills, knowledge, and training to collect high-quality data. Using three years of data from a citizen science bird monitoring project in Salt Lake City, Utah, we assessed bird songs and calls learned by volunteers, and compared species detections, number of birds, and distance measurements between point counts by citizen scientists and professional biologists. We found significant increases in correct species identification for citizen scientists after going through the training program; the average percentage of bird songs and calls identified rose from 42.5% before training to 72.7% after training (p < 0.00001). For two data quality metrics, citizen scientists and professional biologists collected similar quality data: the average number of birds and average detection distances were not significantly different for point counts conducted by citizen scientists and professional biologists in the same locations. However, professional biologists identified an average of 1.48 more species than citizen scientists (p < 0.00001). Our findings emphasize the importance of evaluating training programs and data accuracy for citizen science projects. In instances in which citizen scientists may not be performing at the same level as professional biologists, identifying these patterns ensures that they can be fully explained and accounted for during data analysis.","PeriodicalId":32270,"journal":{"name":"Citizen Science Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46720509","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Citizen science (CS) is a way to open up the scientific process, to make it more accessible and inclusive, and to bring professional scientists and the public together in shared endeavours to advance knowledge. Many initiatives engage citizens in the collection or curation of data, but do not state what happens with such data. Making data open is increasingly common and compulsory in professional science. To conduct transparent, open science with citizens, citizens need to be able to understand what happens with the data they contribute. Data management documentation (DMD) can increase understanding of and trust in citizen science data, improve data quality and accessibility, and increase the reproducibility of experiments. However, such documentation is often designed for specialists rather than amateurs. This paper analyses the use of DMD in CS projects. We present analysis of a qualitative survey and assessment of projects’ DMD, and four vignettes of data management practices. Since most projects in our sample did not have DMD, we further analyse their reasons for not doing so. We discuss the benefits and challenges of different forms of DMD, and barriers to having it, which include a lack of resources, a lack of awareness of tools to support DMD development, and the inaccessibility of existing tools to citizen scientists without formal scientific education. We conclude that, to maximise the inclusivity of citizen science, tools and templates need to be made more accessible for non-experts in data management.
{"title":"Data Management Documentation in Citizen Science Projects: Bringing Formalisation and Transparency Together","authors":"Gefion Thuermer, Esteban González Guardia, Neal Reeves, Óscar Corcho, E. Simperl","doi":"10.5334/cstp.538","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.538","url":null,"abstract":"Citizen science (CS) is a way to open up the scientific process, to make it more accessible and inclusive, and to bring professional scientists and the public together in shared endeavours to advance knowledge. Many initiatives engage citizens in the collection or curation of data, but do not state what happens with such data. Making data open is increasingly common and compulsory in professional science. To conduct transparent, open science with citizens, citizens need to be able to understand what happens with the data they contribute. Data management documentation (DMD) can increase understanding of and trust in citizen science data, improve data quality and accessibility, and increase the reproducibility of experiments. However, such documentation is often designed for specialists rather than amateurs.\u0000This paper analyses the use of DMD in CS projects. We present analysis of a qualitative survey and assessment of projects’ DMD, and four vignettes of data management practices. Since most projects in our sample did not have DMD, we further analyse their reasons for not doing so. We discuss the benefits and challenges of different forms of DMD, and barriers to having it, which include a lack of resources, a lack of awareness of tools to support DMD development, and the inaccessibility of existing tools to citizen scientists without formal scientific education. We conclude that, to maximise the inclusivity of citizen science, tools and templates need to be made more accessible for non-experts in data management.","PeriodicalId":32270,"journal":{"name":"Citizen Science Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49017351","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
A common debate on the value of citizen science projects is the accuracy of data collected and the validity of conclusions drawn. Sow Wild! was a hypothesis-driven citizen science project that investigated the benefits of sowing a 4 m2 mini-meadow in private gardens and allotments to attract beneficial insects. The use of researcher-verified specimen-based methods (pan traps, yellow sticky traps) and observational insect watches allowed investigation of potential bias in identification skills and sampling methods conducted by citizen scientists. For bumblebees and honeybees, identification of pan trap insect specimens was similar between researchers and citizen scientists, but solitary bees were possibly misidentified as social wasps or hoverflies. Key results of the Sow Wild! project differed between specimen-based and observation-only data sets, probably due to unconscious bias, such that incorrect conclusions may have been drawn if we had relied solely on observations made by citizen scientists without detailed training. Comparing the efficiency of sampling methods, insect watches produced the most insect observations overall. Yellow sticky traps collected more solitary wasps, social wasps, hoverflies and honeybees than pan traps. There was also variation in the abundance of insects caught according to the four pan trap colours. While all of these sampling methods can be successfully incorporated into citizen science projects to monitor a range of flying insects in urban landscapes, we recommend that verification of data by taxonomic experts is a valuable component of hypothesis-led citizen science projects, and increased training is required if target taxa include less conspicuous insect groups.
{"title":"Sow Wild! Effective Methods and Identification Bias in Pollinator-Focused Experimental Citizen Science","authors":"Janine Griffiths‐Lee, E. Nicholls, D. Goulson","doi":"10.5334/cstp.550","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.550","url":null,"abstract":"A common debate on the value of citizen science projects is the accuracy of data collected and the validity of conclusions drawn. Sow Wild! was a hypothesis-driven citizen science project that investigated the benefits of sowing a 4 m2 mini-meadow in private gardens and allotments to attract beneficial insects. The use of researcher-verified specimen-based methods (pan traps, yellow sticky traps) and observational insect watches allowed investigation of potential bias in identification skills and sampling methods conducted by citizen scientists. For bumblebees and honeybees, identification of pan trap insect specimens was similar between researchers and citizen scientists, but solitary bees were possibly misidentified as social wasps or hoverflies. Key results of the Sow Wild! project differed between specimen-based and observation-only data sets, probably due to unconscious bias, such that incorrect conclusions may have been drawn if we had relied solely on observations made by citizen scientists without detailed training. Comparing the efficiency of sampling methods, insect watches produced the most insect observations overall. Yellow sticky traps collected more solitary wasps, social wasps, hoverflies and honeybees than pan traps. There was also variation in the abundance of insects caught according to the four pan trap colours. While all of these sampling methods can be successfully incorporated into citizen science projects to monitor a range of flying insects in urban landscapes, we recommend that verification of data by taxonomic experts is a valuable component of hypothesis-led citizen science projects, and increased training is required if target taxa include less conspicuous insect groups.","PeriodicalId":32270,"journal":{"name":"Citizen Science Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42507855","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of social media marketing with brand awareness, the effect of brand awareness on purchase decisions, and the influence of social media marketing through brand awareness on purchase decisions. This type of research is quantitative research with analytical observational methods and cross sectional design. The sampling technique used is the purposive sampling technique with the Slovin formula. The number of samples is 91 respondents. Hypothesis testing using Regression Test and Path Analysis Test. There is an influence between social media marketing and brand awareness, there is an influence of brand awareness with purchase decisions, and there is an influence of social media marketing through brand awareness on purchase decisions.There is an influence between social media marketing and brand awareness, there is an influence of brand awareness with purchase decisions, and there is an influence of social media marketing through brand awareness on purchase decisions.
{"title":"THE INFLUENCE OF SOCIAL MEDIA MARKETING ON BRAND AWERENESS AND THEIR IMPACT ON PURCHASE DECISION (Case Study: English Village of Jogja in Bantul Regency)","authors":"Abdul Mujib, Dimas Wibisono, Toufan Aldian Syah","doi":"10.53866/jimi.v3i2.276","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53866/jimi.v3i2.276","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of social media marketing with brand awareness, the effect of brand awareness on purchase decisions, and the influence of social media marketing through brand awareness on purchase decisions. This type of research is quantitative research with analytical observational methods and cross sectional design. The sampling technique used is the purposive sampling technique with the Slovin formula. The number of samples is 91 respondents. Hypothesis testing using Regression Test and Path Analysis Test. There is an influence between social media marketing and brand awareness, there is an influence of brand awareness with purchase decisions, and there is an influence of social media marketing through brand awareness on purchase decisions.There is an influence between social media marketing and brand awareness, there is an influence of brand awareness with purchase decisions, and there is an influence of social media marketing through brand awareness on purchase decisions.","PeriodicalId":32270,"journal":{"name":"Citizen Science Theory and Practice","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135478349","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The Province of the Special Region of Yogyakarta is one of the parts affected by the natural earthquake due to being passed by three tectonic plate meeting points, namely the Indo-Australian Plate, the Eurasian Plate, and the Pacific Plate. As a result, the surrounding high-rise buildings were damaged. The 6-storey hotel building in Yogyakarta was opened in 2019 referring to the earthquake SNI. The plan for this building will be designed based on SNI 1726:2019 concerning Procedures for Planning Earthquake Resistance for Building and Non-Building Structures and SNI 2847:2019 Requirements for Structural Concrete for Buildings and Non-Building Structures using Etabs v.20.0 software. After the redesign process was carried out, it resulted in changes to the spectrum response graph in SNI 1726: 2019 article 6.4, the seismic force response spectrum controlled by an equivalent static earthquake in SNI 1726: 2019 article 7.9.1 and article 7.9.2.5.2 resulted in a scale factor of 2.182 m/ s2 and do not experience deviations between levels. There are changes in the dimensions of the beams, changes in the longitudinal and transverse reinforcement in the beams and columns, and there are changes in the spacing of the reinforcement in the beams, columns, and floor slabs.
{"title":"REDESAIN BANGUNAN TAHAN GEMPA HOTEL 6 LANTAI DI WILAYAH YOGYAKARTA BERDASARKAN SNI GEMPA 1726:2019","authors":"Vannysa Zian Mara Yogita, Endah Kanti Pangestuti","doi":"10.53866/jimi.v3i2.258","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53866/jimi.v3i2.258","url":null,"abstract":"The Province of the Special Region of Yogyakarta is one of the parts affected by the natural earthquake due to being passed by three tectonic plate meeting points, namely the Indo-Australian Plate, the Eurasian Plate, and the Pacific Plate. As a result, the surrounding high-rise buildings were damaged. The 6-storey hotel building in Yogyakarta was opened in 2019 referring to the earthquake SNI. The plan for this building will be designed based on SNI 1726:2019 concerning Procedures for Planning Earthquake Resistance for Building and Non-Building Structures and SNI 2847:2019 Requirements for Structural Concrete for Buildings and Non-Building Structures using Etabs v.20.0 software. After the redesign process was carried out, it resulted in changes to the spectrum response graph in SNI 1726: 2019 article 6.4, the seismic force response spectrum controlled by an equivalent static earthquake in SNI 1726: 2019 article 7.9.1 and article 7.9.2.5.2 resulted in a scale factor of 2.182 m/ s2 and do not experience deviations between levels. There are changes in the dimensions of the beams, changes in the longitudinal and transverse reinforcement in the beams and columns, and there are changes in the spacing of the reinforcement in the beams, columns, and floor slabs.","PeriodicalId":32270,"journal":{"name":"Citizen Science Theory and Practice","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135692048","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Construction development in Indonesia continues to experience massive growth, especially in technology and innovation. In high-rise buildings, many structural developments have various forms of structural design. A new type of slab used in Indonesia has emerged in recent years: the flat slab. A flat slab is a reinforced concrete construction supported directly by columns without beams. By not using beams, it has the advantage of reducing floor height, faster implementation time, and more economical implementation costs. This research will redesign the structure of a 9-storey hospital building in Kudus with a flat slab structural system and then compare it with a conventional slab structural system using the ETABS and Spcoloumn programs. The earthquake load used refers to the PUSKIM website. This study compares both structural systems' structural period, inter-story deviation, and fundamental earthquake force. From the comparison between the flat slab structural system and the conventional plate, it was obtained that the value of the vibrating period of the flat slab structural system was 11.82% greater in the X direction and 12.82% in the Y direction than the conventional plate structural system. The inter-story deviation of the flat slab is 26.86% greater for the X direction and 28.87% for the Y direction than the conventional slab structural system. The mass (weight) of the flat slab structural system is 8.37% greater than that of the conventional slab structural system. The primary earthquake force of the flat slab is 8.36% greater for the X direction and 8.4% for the Y direction than the conventional slab structural system. So, it can be concluded that a flat slab is less efficient in resisting lateral loads than conventional slabs.
{"title":"PERBANDINGAN FLAT SLAB DENGAN PELAT KONVENSIONAL TERHADAP PENGARUH BEBAN LATERAL","authors":"Aldy Kurnia Saputra, Endah Kanti Pangestuti","doi":"10.53866/jimi.v3i2.241","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53866/jimi.v3i2.241","url":null,"abstract":"Construction development in Indonesia continues to experience massive growth, especially in technology and innovation. In high-rise buildings, many structural developments have various forms of structural design. A new type of slab used in Indonesia has emerged in recent years: the flat slab. A flat slab is a reinforced concrete construction supported directly by columns without beams. By not using beams, it has the advantage of reducing floor height, faster implementation time, and more economical implementation costs. This research will redesign the structure of a 9-storey hospital building in Kudus with a flat slab structural system and then compare it with a conventional slab structural system using the ETABS and Spcoloumn programs. The earthquake load used refers to the PUSKIM website. This study compares both structural systems' structural period, inter-story deviation, and fundamental earthquake force. From the comparison between the flat slab structural system and the conventional plate, it was obtained that the value of the vibrating period of the flat slab structural system was 11.82% greater in the X direction and 12.82% in the Y direction than the conventional plate structural system. The inter-story deviation of the flat slab is 26.86% greater for the X direction and 28.87% for the Y direction than the conventional slab structural system. The mass (weight) of the flat slab structural system is 8.37% greater than that of the conventional slab structural system. The primary earthquake force of the flat slab is 8.36% greater for the X direction and 8.4% for the Y direction than the conventional slab structural system. So, it can be concluded that a flat slab is less efficient in resisting lateral loads than conventional slabs.","PeriodicalId":32270,"journal":{"name":"Citizen Science Theory and Practice","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135288105","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：