Pub Date : 2022-03-30DOI: 10.37769/2077-6608-2022-36-7
A. Sukhno, V. Gulin
The article is related to the revealing of the intent of Hegel’s “Science of Logic”. As authors take it, there is an attempt to imagine the fundamental level of reasoning, where there is no opposition between cognition and its object. In this dimension there is no need to substantiate compatibility between them — it is a level of primary foundation of knowledge. Consequently, any knowledge at this level may be characterized as “Ultimate”. That being said, place of such knowledge is not taken by several specific statements, but by the certain way of organizing those “mental definitions” that are already used by common human sense. To organize these definitions, to arrange them into consistently deployed sequence of logical notions, there is need to abort the search for the primary foundation for knowledge inherent in philosophy from its very origins. This attempt was reflected in Kant's theory of knowledge, where the problem of the reliability of knowledge was solved due to self-limitation in the process of cognition — it was necessary to stop before a certain line, beyond which thought leaves “the limits of possible experience” and falls into the area of insoluble contradictions (antinomies). Hegel's Logic, which, according to the authors, is in a kind of “symbiosis” with the Kantian program, consists in considering these insoluble contradictions precisely as a “symptom” of achieving the primary foundation of knowledge. It is in the collision with an insoluble contradiction that the definitions are organized in the necessary logical sequence, and that fundamental level is reached where there is no opposition between cognition and its object.
{"title":"An instant before the world is born or How to survive in the realm of shadows","authors":"A. Sukhno, V. Gulin","doi":"10.37769/2077-6608-2022-36-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37769/2077-6608-2022-36-7","url":null,"abstract":"The article is related to the revealing of the intent of Hegel’s “Science of Logic”. As authors take it, there is an attempt to imagine the fundamental level of reasoning, where there is no opposition between cognition and its object. In this dimension there is no need to substantiate compatibility between them — it is a level of primary foundation of knowledge. Consequently, any knowledge at this level may be characterized as “Ultimate”. That being said, place of such knowledge is not taken by several specific statements, but by the certain way of organizing those “mental definitions” that are already used by common human sense. To organize these definitions, to arrange them into consistently deployed sequence of logical notions, there is need to abort the search for the primary foundation for knowledge inherent in philosophy from its very origins. This attempt was reflected in Kant's theory of knowledge, where the problem of the reliability of knowledge was solved due to self-limitation in the process of cognition — it was necessary to stop before a certain line, beyond which thought leaves “the limits of possible experience” and falls into the area of insoluble contradictions (antinomies). Hegel's Logic, which, according to the authors, is in a kind of “symbiosis” with the Kantian program, consists in considering these insoluble contradictions precisely as a “symptom” of achieving the primary foundation of knowledge. It is in the collision with an insoluble contradiction that the definitions are organized in the necessary logical sequence, and that fundamental level is reached where there is no opposition between cognition and its object.","PeriodicalId":328399,"journal":{"name":"Vox. Philosophical journal","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131723271","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-03-30DOI: 10.37769/2077-6608-2022-36-2
V. Makarenko
The author substantiates the principle of the researcher’s distance from the political situation in Russia and the entire post-Soviet space [Makarenko V. P., 2016, pp. 53–77] given that the main characteristics of the Russian, Soviet and post-Soviet state mind come from lie, violence and political mediocrity [Makarenko V. P., Akopyan A. G., Khaled R. K. B., 2020]. The leaders of the Russian Empire (Nicholas II) and the Soviet Union (Stalin) engaged the country in two world wars which implies that even the Russian revolutions did not change the patterns of political thinking of the ruling minorities in Russia [Liven D., 2007]. The purpose of this article is to apply the author's concept of bureaucracy to explain the nature of post-Soviet wars. For this, the fundamental research of Hannah Arendt, the observations of writers, war journalists, and civilian analysts of the Soviet war in Afghanistan and the war between Russia and Chechnya in 1994–1996 are being used. The problems of reassessing the links between war and politics, the phenomenon of unknown wars in the history of the USSR and post-Soviet Russia, the reproduction of liars and the process of formation of unrecognized states in the post-Soviet space are considered.
鉴于俄罗斯、苏联和后苏联国家心理的主要特征来自谎言、暴力和政治平庸，作者证实了研究者与俄罗斯和整个后苏联空间的政治局势保持距离的原则[Makarenko V. P.， 2016, pp. 53-77] [Makarenko V. P.， Akopyan A. G.， Khaled R. K. B.， 2020]。俄罗斯帝国(尼古拉二世)和苏联(斯大林)的领导人将国家卷入了两次世界大战，这意味着即使是俄罗斯革命也没有改变俄罗斯统治少数民族的政治思维模式[Liven D.， 2007]。本文的目的是运用作者的官僚主义概念来解释后苏联战争的性质。为此，汉娜·阿伦特(Hannah Arendt)的基础研究、作家、战地记者和民间分析人士对苏联在阿富汗的战争以及1994-1996年俄罗斯与车臣之间的战争的观察都被使用。重新评估战争与政治之间的联系、苏联和后苏联时期俄罗斯历史上的未知战争现象、骗子的再生产以及后苏联空间中未被承认的国家的形成过程等问题都被考虑在内。
{"title":"Nature of post-Soviet wars: fragments of problems","authors":"V. Makarenko","doi":"10.37769/2077-6608-2022-36-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37769/2077-6608-2022-36-2","url":null,"abstract":"The author substantiates the principle of the researcher’s distance from the\u0000political situation in Russia and the entire post-Soviet space [Makarenko V. P., 2016, pp. 53–77]\u0000given that the main characteristics of the Russian, Soviet and post-Soviet state mind come from\u0000lie, violence and political mediocrity [Makarenko V. P., Akopyan A. G., Khaled R. K. B., 2020].\u0000The leaders of the Russian Empire (Nicholas II) and the Soviet Union (Stalin) engaged the\u0000country in two world wars which implies that even the Russian revolutions did not change the\u0000patterns of political thinking of the ruling minorities in Russia [Liven D., 2007].\u0000The purpose of this article is to apply the author's concept of bureaucracy to explain the\u0000nature of post-Soviet wars. For this, the fundamental research of Hannah Arendt, the\u0000observations of writers, war journalists, and civilian analysts of the Soviet war in Afghanistan\u0000and the war between Russia and Chechnya in 1994–1996 are being used. The problems of\u0000reassessing the links between war and politics, the phenomenon of unknown wars in the history\u0000of the USSR and post-Soviet Russia, the reproduction of liars and the process of formation of\u0000unrecognized states in the post-Soviet space are considered.","PeriodicalId":328399,"journal":{"name":"Vox. Philosophical journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132756442","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-31DOI: 10.37769/2077-6608-2021-35-11
B. Podoroga
The paper is set to explore the concept of ‘sympoesis’ as it is laid out in the Donna Haraway title “Staying with the Trouble. Making Kin in Chthulucene”. Tracing back to the symbiosis theory put forth by Lynn Margulis, sympoesis describes a kind of collective production predicated on interaction of a variety of lifeforms, genomes, species, communities and worldviews that overhauls representations of man as a figure of domination ranging from the classical hero to the modern day corporate manager. While looking to understand how Haraway’s conceptual repertory is aligned with her purpose to step outside of the Western anthropocentric legacy thinking and establishing a novel non-human materialistic ontology working through emergent chthonic forces, we consider the Gaia hypothesis and the notions of ‘tentacular thinking’ and ‘trouble’ alongside with a timeline of Anthropocene, Capitalocene, and Chthulucene discussed in the book.
这篇论文旨在探讨“交响曲”的概念，正如唐娜·哈拉威(Donna Haraway)的标题“与麻烦同在”(stay with The Trouble)所阐述的那样。在Chthulucene制作Kin”。追溯到林恩·马古利斯(Lynn Margulis)提出的共生理论，sympoesis描述了一种以各种生命形式、基因组、物种、社区和世界观的相互作用为基础的集体生产，这种生产彻底改变了从古典英雄到现代公司经理的统治形象。为了理解哈拉威的概念是如何与她的目的保持一致的，即走出西方人类中心主义的遗产思维，并通过新兴的民族力量建立一种新的非人类唯物主义本体论，我们考虑了盖亚假说、“触手思维”和“麻烦”的概念，以及书中讨论的人类世、资本世和克苏鲁世的时间轴。
{"title":"Twists and turns of sympoiesis: reflections on the one notion from Donna Haraway’s book \"Staying with the Trouble. Making Kin in the Chthulucene\"","authors":"B. Podoroga","doi":"10.37769/2077-6608-2021-35-11","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37769/2077-6608-2021-35-11","url":null,"abstract":"The paper is set to explore the concept of ‘sympoesis’ as it is laid out in the Donna Haraway title “Staying with the Trouble. Making Kin in Chthulucene”. Tracing back to the symbiosis theory put forth by Lynn Margulis, sympoesis describes a kind of collective production predicated on interaction of a variety of lifeforms, genomes, species, communities and worldviews that overhauls representations of man as a figure of domination ranging from the classical hero to the modern day corporate manager. While looking to understand how Haraway’s conceptual repertory is aligned with her purpose to step outside of the Western anthropocentric legacy thinking and establishing a novel non-human materialistic ontology working through emergent chthonic forces, we consider the Gaia hypothesis and the notions of ‘tentacular thinking’ and ‘trouble’ alongside with a timeline of Anthropocene, Capitalocene, and Chthulucene discussed in the book.","PeriodicalId":328399,"journal":{"name":"Vox. Philosophical journal","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115186517","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-31DOI: 10.37769/2077-6608-2021-35-8
Svetlana Neretina
The article raises the question of understanding history not as a synthesis of the originally ancient Greek understanding of the world, the world of cosmic order and the Jewish Olam, but a palimpsest, where an erased other text is seen through the written text so that two dissimilar images of the world are manifested. The author examines the possibilities of such an understanding of history through the texts of "On the Orator" by Cicero, "Scholastic History" by Comestor and through a fragment of "Proslogion" by Anselm of Canterbury, who included in his work the objection to it of a certain monk Gaunilon. The idea of the world by V. V. Bibikhin seems to be a variant of resolving the problem of a dual understanding of history
这篇文章提出了这样一个问题:不要把历史理解为最初的古希腊对世界的理解的综合，宇宙秩序的世界和犹太人的奥兰，而是一个重写本，在重写本中，一个被抹去的其他文本通过书面文本被看到，从而表现出两个不同的世界形象。作者通过西塞罗的《论演说家》、科米斯特的《经院史》和坎特伯雷的安瑟伦的《序篇》片段来考察这种历史理解的可能性，安瑟伦在他的作品中包括了某个僧侣高尼翁对它的反对。V. V. Bibikhin的世界观念似乎是解决历史的双重理解问题的一种变体
{"title":"Historia magistra vitae","authors":"Svetlana Neretina","doi":"10.37769/2077-6608-2021-35-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37769/2077-6608-2021-35-8","url":null,"abstract":"The article raises the question of understanding history not as a synthesis of the originally ancient Greek understanding of the world, the world of cosmic order and the Jewish Olam, but a palimpsest, where an erased other text is seen through the written text so that two dissimilar images of the world are manifested. The author examines the possibilities of such an understanding of history through the texts of \"On the Orator\" by Cicero, \"Scholastic History\" by Comestor and through a fragment of \"Proslogion\" by Anselm of Canterbury, who included in his work the objection to it of a certain monk Gaunilon. The idea of the world by V. V. Bibikhin seems to be a variant of resolving the problem of a dual understanding of history","PeriodicalId":328399,"journal":{"name":"Vox. Philosophical journal","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121165219","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-31DOI: 10.37769/2077-6608-2021-35-10
Andrei Sevalnikov
The work deals with the large-scale research in the field of nuclear physics and chemistry, which was carried out in the framework of the German Nuclear Project ("Uranverein") from 1939 to 1945 in Austria, which is completely unknown in the Russian literature. The University of Vienna, the Radium Institute of Vienna, the Neutron Institute, as well as the Vienna Higher Technical School took part in the work. Within the framework of the project, the following topics were developed: the creation of a nuclear reactor, the creation of powerful accelerator technology, the creation and study of transuranic elements, the development of computer technology, as well as conducting biomedical radiation experiments
{"title":"Vienna Group within the framework of the German nuclear project","authors":"Andrei Sevalnikov","doi":"10.37769/2077-6608-2021-35-10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37769/2077-6608-2021-35-10","url":null,"abstract":"The work deals with the large-scale research in the field of nuclear physics and chemistry, which was carried out in the framework of the German Nuclear Project (\"Uranverein\") from 1939 to 1945 in Austria, which is completely unknown in the Russian literature. The University of Vienna, the Radium Institute of Vienna, the Neutron Institute, as well as the Vienna Higher Technical School took part in the work. Within the framework of the project, the following topics were developed: the creation of a nuclear reactor, the creation of powerful accelerator technology, the creation and study of transuranic elements, the development of computer technology, as well as conducting biomedical radiation experiments","PeriodicalId":328399,"journal":{"name":"Vox. Philosophical journal","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126685247","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-31DOI: 10.37769/2077-6608-2021-35-7
Sergei Gurko
The article deals with the question of the appropriateness of using the term “civilization” in a historical work. It is shown that the internal inconsistency of this term makes it insufficiently neutral for history-as-science, but, probably, it can serve as a symptom of certain circumstances of history-as-process
{"title":"“Civilization” as a symptom","authors":"Sergei Gurko","doi":"10.37769/2077-6608-2021-35-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37769/2077-6608-2021-35-7","url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the question of the appropriateness of using the term “civilization” in a historical work. It is shown that the internal inconsistency of this term makes it insufficiently neutral for history-as-science, but, probably, it can serve as a symptom of certain circumstances of history-as-process","PeriodicalId":328399,"journal":{"name":"Vox. Philosophical journal","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114443839","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-31DOI: 10.37769/2077-6608-2021-35-2
Fedor Bluher
The article consistently examines the logical, ontological, social, political and ethical grounds for using the science of history as an edifying teaching material. It is shown that in each of the listed disciplines, when using historical material, specific contradictions arise that do not allow making an unambiguous conclusion on the basis of this material, thereby reducing the scientific potential of the above disciplines
{"title":"Why is history a bad teacher?","authors":"Fedor Bluher","doi":"10.37769/2077-6608-2021-35-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37769/2077-6608-2021-35-2","url":null,"abstract":"The article consistently examines the logical, ontological, social, political and ethical grounds for using the science of history as an edifying teaching material. It is shown that in each of the listed disciplines, when using historical material, specific contradictions arise that do not allow making an unambiguous conclusion on the basis of this material, thereby reducing the scientific potential of the above disciplines","PeriodicalId":328399,"journal":{"name":"Vox. Philosophical journal","volume":"1996 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125576752","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-31DOI: 10.37769/2077-6608-2021-35-13
Y. Samoylova
The book examines the problem of narcissism. The old myth of Narcissus is reinterpreted in a completely new discourse — political narcissism.
这本书探讨了自恋的问题。那喀索斯的古老神话在一种全新的话语中被重新诠释——政治自恋。
{"title":"Is there a recipe for getting rid of narcissism?","authors":"Y. Samoylova","doi":"10.37769/2077-6608-2021-35-13","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37769/2077-6608-2021-35-13","url":null,"abstract":"The book examines the problem of narcissism. The old myth of Narcissus is reinterpreted in a completely new discourse — political narcissism.","PeriodicalId":328399,"journal":{"name":"Vox. Philosophical journal","volume":"320 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121936467","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-09-30DOI: 10.37769/2077-6608-2021-34-3
M. Bandurin
This epistemological essay addresses the issue of representational content’s existence in the case of true direct knowledge. Contrary answers to it are considered as a basis for the distinction between representationalism and relationalism. The first part of the essay contains a critical analysis of the fundamental features of German Idealism as a kind of representationalism, which determined the main epistemological trend of continental philosophy in the form of post-Kantian representationalism. In the second part, after a brief excursion into certain contemporary continental issues, the current discussion between representationalism and relationalism in analytical philosophy is considered. It is concluded that relationalism, while correctly recognizing the nature of direct perception as being without representational content, is incapable of ensuring the unity of direct perception and a perceptual judgment, and a solution is proposed that could lead out of this epistemological impasse.
{"title":"The Noumenal Morass: Post-Kantian Representationalism and Its Relationalist Critique in the Light of Strong Disjunctivism","authors":"M. Bandurin","doi":"10.37769/2077-6608-2021-34-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37769/2077-6608-2021-34-3","url":null,"abstract":"This epistemological essay addresses the issue of representational content’s existence in the case of true direct knowledge. Contrary answers to it are considered as a basis for the distinction between representationalism and relationalism. The first part of the essay contains a critical analysis of the fundamental features of German Idealism as a kind of representationalism, which determined the main epistemological trend of continental philosophy in the form of post-Kantian representationalism. In the second part, after a brief excursion into certain contemporary continental issues, the current discussion between representationalism and relationalism in analytical philosophy is considered. It is concluded that relationalism, while correctly recognizing the nature of direct perception as being without representational content, is incapable of ensuring the unity of direct perception and a perceptual judgment, and a solution is proposed that could lead out of this epistemological impasse.","PeriodicalId":328399,"journal":{"name":"Vox. Philosophical journal","volume":"164 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122137467","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-09-30DOI: 10.37769/2077-6608-2021-34-1
V. Rozin
The article presents small fragments of three novels by Meir Shalev, and the author on this material discusses the writer's understanding of love, family and personality. Why, he asks, is the fate of the family as portrayed by Shalev so sad, almost unconnected with love, and why the personality in novels is usually lonely? To answer these questions, an analysis of these three realities important for life is proposed, on the one hand, as Shalev understands them, on the other, how they currently look objectively. The author comes to the conclusion that at present in culture the understanding and concepts of family, love and personality are not coordinated with each other, which gives rise to numerous problems and a crisis of sociality. In parallel, he is trying to clarify the essence of the phenomena of love, family, personality and sociality discussed by Shalev.
{"title":"Love in the family through the eyes of the writer Meir Shalev (and fragments of novel texts and analysis)","authors":"V. Rozin","doi":"10.37769/2077-6608-2021-34-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37769/2077-6608-2021-34-1","url":null,"abstract":"The article presents small fragments of three novels by Meir Shalev, and the author on this material discusses the writer's understanding of love, family and personality. Why, he asks, is the fate of the family as portrayed by Shalev so sad, almost unconnected with love, and why the personality in novels is usually lonely? To answer these questions, an analysis of these three realities important for life is proposed, on the one hand, as Shalev understands them, on the other, how they currently look objectively. The author comes to the conclusion that at present in culture the understanding and concepts of family, love and personality are not coordinated with each other, which gives rise to numerous problems and a crisis of sociality. In parallel, he is trying to clarify the essence of the phenomena of love, family, personality and sociality discussed by Shalev.","PeriodicalId":328399,"journal":{"name":"Vox. Philosophical journal","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130318327","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：