Pub Date : 2020-03-31DOI: 10.37769/2077-6608-2020-28-6
Roman Kremen
The article is devoted to epistemology. It is revealed that progress in the direction of the true representation of a natural object occurs when a meaningful representative definition of it organically connects two fundamental dialectical epistemological flows. The first is the intuitive heuristics that are born of the imagination and are purely subjective nouns, the Genesis of which is idealistic. The second is the sensory-rational experience of observation-apperception, which is a purely external, in relation to the subject, induced reaction due to the material nature of the object. The results of verification activities are an indicator of the organic connection of the indicated flows. It is shown that the «parallel» materialistic and idealistic lines in epistemology point to two equal oppositional realities, the contradiction of which, according to the dialectical method of reasoning, is removed through the constitution of a single metaphysical substance — the spirit. These lines are clearly separated through the reflection of two heterogeneous cognitive components. The necessity of changing paradigmatic guidelines in the philosophy of natural science from mechanistic-atomistic to organismic is discussed. In the preceding part, a criticism is rejected of metaphysics of scientism.
{"title":"Dialectical epistemology","authors":"Roman Kremen","doi":"10.37769/2077-6608-2020-28-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37769/2077-6608-2020-28-6","url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to epistemology. It is revealed that progress in the direction of the true representation of a natural object occurs when a meaningful representative definition of it organically connects two fundamental dialectical epistemological flows. The first is the intuitive heuristics that are born of the imagination and are purely subjective nouns, the Genesis of which is idealistic. The second is the sensory-rational experience of observation-apperception, which is a purely external, in relation to the subject, induced reaction due to the material nature of the object. The results of verification activities are an indicator of the organic connection of the indicated flows. It is shown that the «parallel» materialistic and idealistic lines in epistemology point to two equal oppositional realities, the contradiction of which, according to the dialectical method of reasoning, is removed through the constitution of a single metaphysical substance — the spirit. These lines are clearly separated through the reflection of two heterogeneous cognitive components. The necessity of changing paradigmatic guidelines in the philosophy of natural science from mechanistic-atomistic to organismic is discussed. In the preceding part, a criticism is rejected of metaphysics of scientism.","PeriodicalId":328399,"journal":{"name":"Vox. Philosophical journal","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121711052","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The work of Kaufman "the Myth of Hegel and the technology of its creation" was first published in 1959 in the United States. Despite the historical significance of Hegel's philosophy, some of his critics do not bother to study the primary sources and fundamentally important research literature. This opens up the possibility not only to misunderstandings, but deliberate speculation and distorted, including politically biased, interpretations, substitute the real views of Hegel myth-making dealing with them a thinker. The work of Kaufman discloses a technique of creation a mythological conception of Hegel's philosophy on the material provided by well-known and influential ideologist of the liberal doctrine of the "open society" of Karl Popper.
{"title":"The Hegel Myth and Its Method","authors":"W. Kaufmann","doi":"10.2307/2181420","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/2181420","url":null,"abstract":"The work of Kaufman \"the Myth of Hegel and the technology of its creation\" was first published in 1959 in the United States. Despite the historical significance of Hegel's philosophy, some of his critics do not bother to study the primary sources and fundamentally important research literature. This opens up the possibility not only to misunderstandings, but deliberate speculation and distorted, including politically biased, interpretations, substitute the real views of Hegel myth-making dealing with them a thinker. The work of Kaufman discloses a technique of creation a mythological conception of Hegel's philosophy on the material provided by well-known and influential ideologist of the liberal doctrine of the \"open society\" of Karl Popper.","PeriodicalId":328399,"journal":{"name":"Vox. Philosophical journal","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1951-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131779329","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：