Pub Date : 2023-10-07DOI: 10.14211/regepe.esbj.e2304
Bruno Grezole, Giovana Bueno
Objetivo: investigar as motivações, o perfil e as competências do indivíduo que escolhe empreender; promover a reflexão acerca do posicionamento do empreendedor perante uma grande crise; e buscar resposta para a questão: ser digital influencer é ser empreendedor? Metodologia/ Abordagem: caso de ensino. Principais resultados: nas “notas de ensino”, são sugeridas discussões sobre o empreendedorismo, propriamente dito, o uso do modelo de negócio e a internacionalização de pequenas empresas. Contribuições teórico metodológicas: a própria estrutura do caso contribui metodologicamente para a dinâmica em sala de aula, constituindo-se uma ferramenta a mais de aprendizagem do assunto em questão. Relevância/originalidade: o caso é relevante porque retrata a história de um empreendedor (Breno) que, após realizar seu sonho e criar um negócio promissor (uma agência de viagens), em decorrência de uma grande crise (Covid-19, lockdown e seu impacto no segmento de viagens, bem como a depressão e sentimento de impotência por ela gerados), precisa se reinventar profissionalmente (tornando-se um bem-sucedido consultor on-line para empreendedores). Com o fim da pandemia e a retomada dos negócios, surge o impasse: permanecer como digital influencer ou reativar a antiga empresa (pois o turismo voltou a crescer)? Contribuições sociais para a gestão: o caso retrata a realidade do empreendedor no Brasil e traz questionamentos sobre a regulamentação da profissão de digital influencer.
{"title":"Driblando a Covid-19: Desafios e dilemas de um empreendedor","authors":"Bruno Grezole, Giovana Bueno","doi":"10.14211/regepe.esbj.e2304","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14211/regepe.esbj.e2304","url":null,"abstract":"Objetivo: investigar as motivações, o perfil e as competências do indivíduo que escolhe empreender; promover a reflexão acerca do posicionamento do empreendedor perante uma grande crise; e buscar resposta para a questão: ser digital influencer é ser empreendedor? Metodologia/ Abordagem: caso de ensino. Principais resultados: nas “notas de ensino”, são sugeridas discussões sobre o empreendedorismo, propriamente dito, o uso do modelo de negócio e a internacionalização de pequenas empresas. Contribuições teórico metodológicas: a própria estrutura do caso contribui metodologicamente para a dinâmica em sala de aula, constituindo-se uma ferramenta a mais de aprendizagem do assunto em questão. Relevância/originalidade: o caso é relevante porque retrata a história de um empreendedor (Breno) que, após realizar seu sonho e criar um negócio promissor (uma agência de viagens), em decorrência de uma grande crise (Covid-19, lockdown e seu impacto no segmento de viagens, bem como a depressão e sentimento de impotência por ela gerados), precisa se reinventar profissionalmente (tornando-se um bem-sucedido consultor on-line para empreendedores). Com o fim da pandemia e a retomada dos negócios, surge o impasse: permanecer como digital influencer ou reativar a antiga empresa (pois o turismo voltou a crescer)? Contribuições sociais para a gestão: o caso retrata a realidade do empreendedor no Brasil e traz questionamentos sobre a regulamentação da profissão de digital influencer.","PeriodicalId":356018,"journal":{"name":"REGEPE Entrepreneurship and Small Business Journal","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135253280","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objetivo: analisar os efeitos das políticas de gênero na criação de empresas por mulheres. Metodologia/abordagem: abordagem quantitativa, com dados secundários extraídos da Pesquisa de Informações Básicas Municipais (MUNIC); e dados públicos de CNPJ, da Receita Federal. O nível de análise foi restrito aos 246 municípios do estado de Goiás. A partir disso, foram realizados testes com dois modelos de regressão binomial negativos. Principais resultados: para as empreendedoras que criaram seus negócios sozinhas, as políticas de gênero apresentaram uma relação positiva; por outro lado, para as que criaram empresas em sociedade, nenhuma influência foi identificada. Com esses resultados, é possível compreender que as mesmas medidas de apoio podem não apresentar efeitos semelhantes a todos os tipos de criação de empresas por mulheres. Contribuições teóricas-metodológicas: este estudo evidenciou que, ao analisar as políticas públicas como meio de fomento ao empreendedorismo por mulheres, deve-se considerar as diferenças existentes entre elas, seja nos aspectos contextuais nos quais estão inseridas, seja como especificidade de cada grupo, tendo em vista que necessidades diferentes requererem ações de apoio distintas. Relevância/originalidade: especialmente para as mulheres que empreendem sozinhas, segundo esta pesquisa, a existência de políticas de gênero mostra-se fator importante, pois dificuldades, como as geradas pela discriminação, poderão ser enfrentadas, atendendo, com isso, às necessidades de acesso à educação, à igualdade, à saúde e à segurança.
{"title":"A relação entre as políticas de gênero e a criação de empresas por mulheres","authors":"Daiane Martins Teixeira, Cândido Vieira Borges Júnior, Marcos Inácio Severo de Almeida","doi":"10.14211/regepe.esbj.e2137","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14211/regepe.esbj.e2137","url":null,"abstract":"Objetivo: analisar os efeitos das políticas de gênero na criação de empresas por mulheres. Metodologia/abordagem: abordagem quantitativa, com dados secundários extraídos da Pesquisa de Informações Básicas Municipais (MUNIC); e dados públicos de CNPJ, da Receita Federal. O nível de análise foi restrito aos 246 municípios do estado de Goiás. A partir disso, foram realizados testes com dois modelos de regressão binomial negativos. Principais resultados: para as empreendedoras que criaram seus negócios sozinhas, as políticas de gênero apresentaram uma relação positiva; por outro lado, para as que criaram empresas em sociedade, nenhuma influência foi identificada. Com esses resultados, é possível compreender que as mesmas medidas de apoio podem não apresentar efeitos semelhantes a todos os tipos de criação de empresas por mulheres. Contribuições teóricas-metodológicas: este estudo evidenciou que, ao analisar as políticas públicas como meio de fomento ao empreendedorismo por mulheres, deve-se considerar as diferenças existentes entre elas, seja nos aspectos contextuais nos quais estão inseridas, seja como especificidade de cada grupo, tendo em vista que necessidades diferentes requererem ações de apoio distintas. Relevância/originalidade: especialmente para as mulheres que empreendem sozinhas, segundo esta pesquisa, a existência de políticas de gênero mostra-se fator importante, pois dificuldades, como as geradas pela discriminação, poderão ser enfrentadas, atendendo, com isso, às necessidades de acesso à educação, à igualdade, à saúde e à segurança.","PeriodicalId":356018,"journal":{"name":"REGEPE Entrepreneurship and Small Business Journal","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135194108","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: to analyze the effects of gender policies on women's business creation. Methodology/approach: quantitative approach, with secondary data extracted from the Municipal Basic Information Survey (MUNIC); and public CNPJ data from the Federal Revenue Service. The level of analysis was restricted to the 246 municipalities in the state of Goiás. From this, tests were performed with two negative binomial regression models. Main results: for women entrepreneurs who created their businesses alone, gender policies showed a positive relationship; on the other hand, for those who created companies in partnership, no influence was identified. With these results, it is possible to understand that the same support measures may not have similar effects to all types of business creation by women. Theoretical-methodological contributions: this study showed that, when analyzing public policies as a means of promoting entrepreneurship by women, one should consider the existing differences between them, either in the contextual aspects in which they are inserted, or as the specificity of each group, bearing in mind that needs different require different support actions. Relevance/originality: especially for women who are self-employed, according to this research, the existence of gender policies proves to be an important factor, since difficulties, such as those generated by discrimination, can be faced, thus meeting the needs of access to education, equality, health and safety.
{"title":"The relationship between gender policies and the creation of businesses by women","authors":"Daiane Martins Teixeira, Cândido Vieira Borges Júnior, Marcos Inácio Severo de Almeida","doi":"10.14211/regepe.esbj.e2438","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14211/regepe.esbj.e2438","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: to analyze the effects of gender policies on women's business creation. Methodology/approach: quantitative approach, with secondary data extracted from the Municipal Basic Information Survey (MUNIC); and public CNPJ data from the Federal Revenue Service. The level of analysis was restricted to the 246 municipalities in the state of Goiás. From this, tests were performed with two negative binomial regression models. Main results: for women entrepreneurs who created their businesses alone, gender policies showed a positive relationship; on the other hand, for those who created companies in partnership, no influence was identified. With these results, it is possible to understand that the same support measures may not have similar effects to all types of business creation by women. Theoretical-methodological contributions: this study showed that, when analyzing public policies as a means of promoting entrepreneurship by women, one should consider the existing differences between them, either in the contextual aspects in which they are inserted, or as the specificity of each group, bearing in mind that needs different require different support actions. Relevance/originality: especially for women who are self-employed, according to this research, the existence of gender policies proves to be an important factor, since difficulties, such as those generated by discrimination, can be faced, thus meeting the needs of access to education, equality, health and safety.","PeriodicalId":356018,"journal":{"name":"REGEPE Entrepreneurship and Small Business Journal","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135193559","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-23DOI: 10.14211/regepe.esbj.e2226
Clarice Secches Kogut, Renato Dourado Cotta de Mello, Robert Skorupski
Objective of the study: This paper gathers, and reviews published empirical or theoretical articles in which the entrepreneurial logics of causation and effectuation, coined by Sarasvathy in 2001, are discussed to answer the research question of “Under what circumstances do firms combine effectuation with causation?”. Methodology/approach: The research is based on a systematic literature review of top-tier journals over a 20-year period. Main results: Findings suggest causation and effectuation logics can be applied simultaneously or in sequence, depending on factors at the micro (the entrepreneur), meso (the firm), and macro levels (business context—institutional and situational). Theoretical/methodological contributions: It delivers a compiled, synthesized, and contrasted set of past work for future researchers to build upon and a preliminary conceptual matrix for further testing and refinement, not to mention an in-depth discussion at the micro, meso and macro level. Relevance/originality: Over 20 years after Sarasvathy’s seminal work, most literature investigating decision-making still focuses on contrasting the logics of causation or effectuation, not fully understanding the conditions under which each prevails or when they are combined. Social/management contributions: At the micro level, this research can help entrepreneurs better understand their profile and the benefits of considering both logics throughout their decision-making process. At the meso level, companies can benefit from understanding how logics relate at each life stage. Finally, at the macro level, policymakers and educators can help entrepreneurs navigate uncertain and turbulent environments if different logics and circumstances are more broadly acknowledged.
{"title":"Combining effectuation and causation approaches in entrepreneurship: A 20+ years review","authors":"Clarice Secches Kogut, Renato Dourado Cotta de Mello, Robert Skorupski","doi":"10.14211/regepe.esbj.e2226","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14211/regepe.esbj.e2226","url":null,"abstract":"Objective of the study: This paper gathers, and reviews published empirical or theoretical articles in which the entrepreneurial logics of causation and effectuation, coined by Sarasvathy in 2001, are discussed to answer the research question of “Under what circumstances do firms combine effectuation with causation?”. Methodology/approach: The research is based on a systematic literature review of top-tier journals over a 20-year period. Main results: Findings suggest causation and effectuation logics can be applied simultaneously or in sequence, depending on factors at the micro (the entrepreneur), meso (the firm), and macro levels (business context—institutional and situational). Theoretical/methodological contributions: It delivers a compiled, synthesized, and contrasted set of past work for future researchers to build upon and a preliminary conceptual matrix for further testing and refinement, not to mention an in-depth discussion at the micro, meso and macro level. Relevance/originality: Over 20 years after Sarasvathy’s seminal work, most literature investigating decision-making still focuses on contrasting the logics of causation or effectuation, not fully understanding the conditions under which each prevails or when they are combined. Social/management contributions: At the micro level, this research can help entrepreneurs better understand their profile and the benefits of considering both logics throughout their decision-making process. At the meso level, companies can benefit from understanding how logics relate at each life stage. Finally, at the macro level, policymakers and educators can help entrepreneurs navigate uncertain and turbulent environments if different logics and circumstances are more broadly acknowledged.","PeriodicalId":356018,"journal":{"name":"REGEPE Entrepreneurship and Small Business Journal","volume":"316 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135959731","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-04DOI: 10.14211/regepe.esbj.e2055
F. D'Andrea, Diego Alex Gazaro dos Santos, César Vinícius Pereira Costa, A. Zen
Objective: Entrepreneurs are responsible for innovation, but they do not act in the vacuum, the greater the support for their action, the improve the chances of success. Startups - technology-based companies with high potential for growth and impact - are associated with the existence of entrepreneurial ecosystems that facilitate entrepreneurial action. This paper goal is to provide evidence that help to explain why startups fail in an emerging entrepreneurial ecosystem. Method: We perform exploratory research in which entrepreneurs whose startups failed in the emerging entrepreneurial ecosystem of Porto Alegre, Brazil, were interviewed. We complement the analysis with the collection of secondary data. Results: Building on Isenberg’s (2011) six domains, we generate ideas on how each of them in emergent entrepreneurial ecosystem may influence startup mortality. Our results indicate that emerging entrepreneurial ecosystem could be much better in avoiding the premature failure of startups. Policy and Finance are the most problematic domains, while culture, support, and markets are the three middle-ground dimensions. These last three need improvement, but they are not as critical as the first two. Contributions: This paper contributes to the entrepreneurial ecosystems literature by exploring how emergent ecosystems contribute for discontinuity of promising startups. Originality: Besides entrepreneurial mistakes, problems that are out of the entrepreneur control can also cause a venture's death (Cardon et al., 2011). Building on this, we use Isenberg's (2010; 2011) model for understanding the influence of the entrepreneurial ecosystem on the circumstances that entrepreneurs faced that determined their startup failure (Jenkins & McKelvie, 2016). Social Contributions: by better understanding why startups fail in emerging entrepreneurial ecosystems, we support policymakers in their focus on possible improvements of the features that seem most relevant to entrepreneurs. The public agents can then work to provide a better environment for future entrepreneurial endeavors.
目标:企业家对创新负责，但他们不是在真空中行动，对他们行动的支持越大，成功的机会就越高。初创公司——具有高增长潜力和影响力的技术型公司——与促进创业行动的创业生态系统的存在有关。本文的目标是提供证据，帮助解释为什么创业公司会在新兴的创业生态系统中失败。方法:我们对在巴西阿雷格里港新兴创业生态系统中创业失败的企业家进行了探索性研究。我们通过收集辅助数据来补充分析。结果:基于Isenberg(2011)的六个领域，我们产生了关于新兴创业生态系统中每个领域如何影响创业死亡率的想法。我们的研究结果表明，新兴的创业生态系统可以更好地避免创业公司的过早失败。政策和金融是问题最大的领域，而文化、支持和市场是三个中间维度。后三点需要改进，但它们不如前两点那么重要。贡献:本文通过探索新兴生态系统如何促进有前途的初创企业的不连续性，为创业生态系统文献做出了贡献。独创性:除了创业失误之外，企业家无法控制的问题也可能导致企业的死亡(Cardon et al.， 2011)。在此基础上，我们使用了Isenberg (2010;2011)的模型来理解创业生态系统对企业家所面临的环境的影响，这些环境决定了他们的创业失败(Jenkins & McKelvie, 2016)。社会贡献:通过更好地理解创业公司在新兴创业生态系统中失败的原因，我们支持政策制定者关注与企业家最相关的功能的可能改进。然后，公共机构可以努力为未来的创业努力提供更好的环境。
{"title":"Why startups fail in emerging entrepreneurial ecosystems?","authors":"F. D'Andrea, Diego Alex Gazaro dos Santos, César Vinícius Pereira Costa, A. Zen","doi":"10.14211/regepe.esbj.e2055","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14211/regepe.esbj.e2055","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Entrepreneurs are responsible for innovation, but they do not act in the vacuum, the greater the support for their action, the improve the chances of success. Startups - technology-based companies with high potential for growth and impact - are associated with the existence of entrepreneurial ecosystems that facilitate entrepreneurial action. This paper goal is to provide evidence that help to explain why startups fail in an emerging entrepreneurial ecosystem. Method: We perform exploratory research in which entrepreneurs whose startups failed in the emerging entrepreneurial ecosystem of Porto Alegre, Brazil, were interviewed. We complement the analysis with the collection of secondary data. Results: Building on Isenberg’s (2011) six domains, we generate ideas on how each of them in emergent entrepreneurial ecosystem may influence startup mortality. Our results indicate that emerging entrepreneurial ecosystem could be much better in avoiding the premature failure of startups. Policy and Finance are the most problematic domains, while culture, support, and markets are the three middle-ground dimensions. These last three need improvement, but they are not as critical as the first two. Contributions: This paper contributes to the entrepreneurial ecosystems literature by exploring how emergent ecosystems contribute for discontinuity of promising startups. Originality: Besides entrepreneurial mistakes, problems that are out of the entrepreneur control can also cause a venture's death (Cardon et al., 2011). Building on this, we use Isenberg's (2010; 2011) model for understanding the influence of the entrepreneurial ecosystem on the circumstances that entrepreneurs faced that determined their startup failure (Jenkins & McKelvie, 2016). Social Contributions: by better understanding why startups fail in emerging entrepreneurial ecosystems, we support policymakers in their focus on possible improvements of the features that seem most relevant to entrepreneurs. The public agents can then work to provide a better environment for future entrepreneurial endeavors.","PeriodicalId":356018,"journal":{"name":"REGEPE Entrepreneurship and Small Business Journal","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116221310","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-27DOI: 10.14211/regepe.esbj.e2286
Vanessa Mesquita Blas Garcia, C. D. P. Martens, Renato Penha, Mauro Luiz Martens
Objetivo do estudo: avaliar empiricamente como as dimensões da Orientação Empreendedora (OE) podem auxiliar na solução dos desafios da adoção de Métodos Ágeis (MA). Metodologia/abordagem: estudo de caso único em uma startup de software. Principais resultados: confirmação da existência de desafios para a adoção dos MA em três dimensões (pessoas, processos, e gestão e organização), na startup foco do estudo, e de quais dimensões da OE mais contribuem para a solução desses desafios. Relevância/originalidade: embora a OE e suas dimensões sejam reconhecidas pelos entrevistados como possíveis ações para solucionar os desafios para a adoção de MA, elas não são incentivadas quando o time é alocado no cliente, por influência cultural. A pesquisa é relevante, pois tem a finalidade de ajudar a compreender tais desafios e de sugerir formas para os resolver. Contribuições teórico/metodológicas: como contribuição acadêmica, este estudo avançou nas pesquisas sobre a adoção de MA e a OE, bem como acerca da relação entre os tópicos. Contribuições sociais/para a gestão: entendimento dos desafios inerentes à adoção e à utilização dos MA, e incentivo de ações capazes de auxiliar na solução desses desafios, a partir da utilização dos conceitos de OE.
{"title":"A Orientação Empreendedora como apoio na solução dos desafios da adoção de Métodos Ágeis: Um estudo de caso em Startup brasileira","authors":"Vanessa Mesquita Blas Garcia, C. D. P. Martens, Renato Penha, Mauro Luiz Martens","doi":"10.14211/regepe.esbj.e2286","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14211/regepe.esbj.e2286","url":null,"abstract":"Objetivo do estudo: avaliar empiricamente como as dimensões da Orientação Empreendedora (OE) podem auxiliar na solução dos desafios da adoção de Métodos Ágeis (MA). Metodologia/abordagem: estudo de caso único em uma startup de software. Principais resultados: confirmação da existência de desafios para a adoção dos MA em três dimensões (pessoas, processos, e gestão e organização), na startup foco do estudo, e de quais dimensões da OE mais contribuem para a solução desses desafios. Relevância/originalidade: embora a OE e suas dimensões sejam reconhecidas pelos entrevistados como possíveis ações para solucionar os desafios para a adoção de MA, elas não são incentivadas quando o time é alocado no cliente, por influência cultural. A pesquisa é relevante, pois tem a finalidade de ajudar a compreender tais desafios e de sugerir formas para os resolver. Contribuições teórico/metodológicas: como contribuição acadêmica, este estudo avançou nas pesquisas sobre a adoção de MA e a OE, bem como acerca da relação entre os tópicos. Contribuições sociais/para a gestão: entendimento dos desafios inerentes à adoção e à utilização dos MA, e incentivo de ações capazes de auxiliar na solução desses desafios, a partir da utilização dos conceitos de OE.","PeriodicalId":356018,"journal":{"name":"REGEPE Entrepreneurship and Small Business Journal","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133471541","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-27DOI: 10.14211/regepe.esbj.e2404
Vanessa Mesquita Blas Garcia, C. D. P. Martens, Renato Penha, M. Martens
Study objective: empirically evaluate how the dimensions of Entrepreneurial Orientation (EO) can help solve the challenges of Agile Method adoption (AM). Methodology/approach: single case study in a software startup. Key findings: confirmation of challenges in adopting AM across three dimensions (people, processes, and management and organization) in the studied startup, and identification of which dimensions of EO contribute most to solving these challenges. Relevance/originality: although EO and its dimensions are recognized by the interviewees as potential actions to solve the challenges of AM adoption, they are not encouraged when the team is allocated at the client's site due to cultural influence. This research is relevant as it aims to help understand these challenges and suggest ways to overcome them. Theoretical/methodological contributions: as an academic contribution, this study advances research on the adoption of AM and EO, as well as the relationship between these topics. Social/management contributions: understanding the inherent challenges in adopting and using AM and promoting actions that can assist in solving these challenges through the utilization of EO concepts.
{"title":"Entrepreneurial Orientation as support in solving the challenges of Agile Methods adoption: A case study in a Brazilian startup","authors":"Vanessa Mesquita Blas Garcia, C. D. P. Martens, Renato Penha, M. Martens","doi":"10.14211/regepe.esbj.e2404","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14211/regepe.esbj.e2404","url":null,"abstract":"Study objective: empirically evaluate how the dimensions of Entrepreneurial Orientation (EO) can help solve the challenges of Agile Method adoption (AM). Methodology/approach: single case study in a software startup. Key findings: confirmation of challenges in adopting AM across three dimensions (people, processes, and management and organization) in the studied startup, and identification of which dimensions of EO contribute most to solving these challenges. Relevance/originality: although EO and its dimensions are recognized by the interviewees as potential actions to solve the challenges of AM adoption, they are not encouraged when the team is allocated at the client's site due to cultural influence. This research is relevant as it aims to help understand these challenges and suggest ways to overcome them. Theoretical/methodological contributions: as an academic contribution, this study advances research on the adoption of AM and EO, as well as the relationship between these topics. Social/management contributions: understanding the inherent challenges in adopting and using AM and promoting actions that can assist in solving these challenges through the utilization of EO concepts.","PeriodicalId":356018,"journal":{"name":"REGEPE Entrepreneurship and Small Business Journal","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127760641","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-24DOI: 10.14211/regepe.esbj.e2405
G. D. Alperstedt, Carolina Andion, Priscila Keller Pires
Objective: provide a critical examination of existing theoretical models and their disagreements that arise from divergent political views, imbued with value about what the social is, what is good and what is bad. Methodology/Approach: theoretical essay that examines, on the one hand, the theoretical discussion that encompasses models with different logics and organizational formats, with an emphasis on prescriptive approaches that romanticize this type of enterprise and, on the other hand, critical approaches that interpret the debate not as a rupture, but as a legitimizing and reproducing character of the established social order. Main results: the visions about social enterprises, divergent in many of the existing theoretical models, shift attention from socio-environmental problems by focusing on heroic individuals and miraculous “solutions”. Social innovation would be the way to solve the impasse of how social transformations are generated in practice, involving different actors that go beyond the discussion in question, directing the debate to the notion of social innovation ecosystems. Theoretical/methodological contributions: propose an inclusive framework that involves the acceptance of diversity and pluralism, and that goes beyond the dispute between models, in order to allow greater focus on socio-environmental issues, recognizing the importance of collective approaches, socio-historical, cultural and territorial differences, in addition to hosting multiscale and multisectoral studies in the direction of social innovation as a transforming process. Relevance/originality: The article expands the understanding of the characteristics and typologies of social enterprises and their different interpretations, leading to reflection on their practices and advancing in the study of the real consequences that these organizations promote, bringing to the fore the debate on social innovation as focus. Social contributions: by discussing the practical consequences of social enterprises and bringing to light the social innovations that these actors co-produce in their specific realities, the article sheds light on this broader dimension directed to the serious problems experienced today.
{"title":"From social enterprises to impact businesses: Examining the theoretical debate toward social innovation","authors":"G. D. Alperstedt, Carolina Andion, Priscila Keller Pires","doi":"10.14211/regepe.esbj.e2405","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14211/regepe.esbj.e2405","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: provide a critical examination of existing theoretical models and their disagreements that arise from divergent political views, imbued with value about what the social is, what is good and what is bad. Methodology/Approach: theoretical essay that examines, on the one hand, the theoretical discussion that encompasses models with different logics and organizational formats, with an emphasis on prescriptive approaches that romanticize this type of enterprise and, on the other hand, critical approaches that interpret the debate not as a rupture, but as a legitimizing and reproducing character of the established social order. Main results: the visions about social enterprises, divergent in many of the existing theoretical models, shift attention from socio-environmental problems by focusing on heroic individuals and miraculous “solutions”. Social innovation would be the way to solve the impasse of how social transformations are generated in practice, involving different actors that go beyond the discussion in question, directing the debate to the notion of social innovation ecosystems. Theoretical/methodological contributions: propose an inclusive framework that involves the acceptance of diversity and pluralism, and that goes beyond the dispute between models, in order to allow greater focus on socio-environmental issues, recognizing the importance of collective approaches, socio-historical, cultural and territorial differences, in addition to hosting multiscale and multisectoral studies in the direction of social innovation as a transforming process. Relevance/originality: The article expands the understanding of the characteristics and typologies of social enterprises and their different interpretations, leading to reflection on their practices and advancing in the study of the real consequences that these organizations promote, bringing to the fore the debate on social innovation as focus. Social contributions: by discussing the practical consequences of social enterprises and bringing to light the social innovations that these actors co-produce in their specific realities, the article sheds light on this broader dimension directed to the serious problems experienced today.","PeriodicalId":356018,"journal":{"name":"REGEPE Entrepreneurship and Small Business Journal","volume":"182 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115216483","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-24DOI: 10.14211/regepe.esbj.e2264
Graziela Dias Alperstedt, Carolina Andion, Priscila Keller Pires
Objetivo: fornecer um exame crítico dos modelos teóricos existentes e seus desentendimentos, advindos de visões políticas divergentes, imbuídas de valor sobre o que é o social, o que é bom e o que é ruim. Metodologia/Abordagem: ensaio teórico que examina, por um lado, a discussão teórica que abarca modelos com lógicas e formatos organizacionais diversos, com ênfase em abordagens prescritivas que romantizam alguns tipos de empreendimentos e, por outro, abordagens críticas que interpretam o debate não como uma ruptura, mas sob um caráter legitimador e reprodutor da ordem social estabelecida. Principais resultados: as visões acerca dos empreendimentos sociais, divergente em muitos dos modelos teóricos existentes, deslocam a atenção dos problemas socioambientais por se concentrarem em indivíduos heróis e “soluções” milagrosas. A inovação social seria o caminho para se solucionar o impasse de como as transformações sociais são geradas na prática, envolvendo atores diversos que extrapolam a discussão em pauta, direcionando o debate para a noção de ecossistemas de inovação social. Contribuições teóricas/metodológicas: propõem um enquadramento inclusivo que envolve a aceitação da diversidade e do pluralismo, e que extrapola a disputa entre modelos, de forma a permitir maior foco nas problemáticas socioambientais, reconhecendo a importância das abordagens coletivas, das diferenças socio-históricas, culturais e territoriais, além do acolhimento de estudos multiescalares e multissetoriais na direção da inovação social como processo transformador. Relevância/originalidade: o artigo amplia a compreensão sobre as características e tipologias dos empreendimentos sociais e suas diversas interpretações, levando à reflexão sobre suas práticas e avançando no estudo sobre as consequências reais que essas organizações promovem, trazendo à tona o debate da inovação social como foco. Contribuições sociais: ao discutir as consequências práticas dos empreendimentos sociais e trazer à tona as inovações sociais que estes atores coproduzem em suas realidades específicas, o artigo traz luz para essa dimensão mais abrangente direcionada aos graves problemas vivenciados na atualidade.
{"title":"Dos empreendimentos sociais aos negócios de impacto: Examinando o debate teórico rumo à inovação social","authors":"Graziela Dias Alperstedt, Carolina Andion, Priscila Keller Pires","doi":"10.14211/regepe.esbj.e2264","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14211/regepe.esbj.e2264","url":null,"abstract":"Objetivo: fornecer um exame crítico dos modelos teóricos existentes e seus desentendimentos, advindos de visões políticas divergentes, imbuídas de valor sobre o que é o social, o que é bom e o que é ruim. Metodologia/Abordagem: ensaio teórico que examina, por um lado, a discussão teórica que abarca modelos com lógicas e formatos organizacionais diversos, com ênfase em abordagens prescritivas que romantizam alguns tipos de empreendimentos e, por outro, abordagens críticas que interpretam o debate não como uma ruptura, mas sob um caráter legitimador e reprodutor da ordem social estabelecida. Principais resultados: as visões acerca dos empreendimentos sociais, divergente em muitos dos modelos teóricos existentes, deslocam a atenção dos problemas socioambientais por se concentrarem em indivíduos heróis e “soluções” milagrosas. A inovação social seria o caminho para se solucionar o impasse de como as transformações sociais são geradas na prática, envolvendo atores diversos que extrapolam a discussão em pauta, direcionando o debate para a noção de ecossistemas de inovação social. Contribuições teóricas/metodológicas: propõem um enquadramento inclusivo que envolve a aceitação da diversidade e do pluralismo, e que extrapola a disputa entre modelos, de forma a permitir maior foco nas problemáticas socioambientais, reconhecendo a importância das abordagens coletivas, das diferenças socio-históricas, culturais e territoriais, além do acolhimento de estudos multiescalares e multissetoriais na direção da inovação social como processo transformador. Relevância/originalidade: o artigo amplia a compreensão sobre as características e tipologias dos empreendimentos sociais e suas diversas interpretações, levando à reflexão sobre suas práticas e avançando no estudo sobre as consequências reais que essas organizações promovem, trazendo à tona o debate da inovação social como foco. Contribuições sociais: ao discutir as consequências práticas dos empreendimentos sociais e trazer à tona as inovações sociais que estes atores coproduzem em suas realidades específicas, o artigo traz luz para essa dimensão mais abrangente direcionada aos graves problemas vivenciados na atualidade.","PeriodicalId":356018,"journal":{"name":"REGEPE Entrepreneurship and Small Business Journal","volume":"220 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122190792","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-23DOI: 10.14211/regepe.esbj.e2164
V. Kaniak, R. Teixeira, A. Takahashi, Ananda Silva Singh
Objective of the study: In order to understand how universities in south Brazil have been developing their entrepreneurship mission this study aimed to analyze the role of their Technology Transfer Offices (TTOs) by the lens of the dynamic capability theory, considering sensing, seizing and transforming practices. Methodology/approach: qualitative approach, and a multiple case study strategy, 31 semi-structured interviews were carried out with different actors linked to university TTOs as well as documentary research. Main results: The results reveal that sensing, seizing, and transforming practices have been adopted by the university TTOs and are supporting them to face the new scenario in higher education represented by entrepreneurial and innovational demands. Theoretical contributions: They consist on a debate on how universities in Brazil are strategically managing their practices in order to adapt to a new era in higher education throughout the development of dynamic capabilities. Relevance/originality: This research provides an in‐depth process analysis including the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities to the development and the advance of the third mission of the universities, contributing to the study’s originality. Management contributions: The managemental contribution of this study is to offer a view of new modes and practices for other universities that are seeking to operate in an entrepreneurial dimension.
{"title":"Universities' entrepreneurship mission in a Dynamic Capability approach: A multicase study in south Brazil","authors":"V. Kaniak, R. Teixeira, A. Takahashi, Ananda Silva Singh","doi":"10.14211/regepe.esbj.e2164","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14211/regepe.esbj.e2164","url":null,"abstract":"Objective of the study: In order to understand how universities in south Brazil have been developing their entrepreneurship mission this study aimed to analyze the role of their Technology Transfer Offices (TTOs) by the lens of the dynamic capability theory, considering sensing, seizing and transforming practices. Methodology/approach: qualitative approach, and a multiple case study strategy, 31 semi-structured interviews were carried out with different actors linked to university TTOs as well as documentary research. Main results: The results reveal that sensing, seizing, and transforming practices have been adopted by the university TTOs and are supporting them to face the new scenario in higher education represented by entrepreneurial and innovational demands. Theoretical contributions: They consist on a debate on how universities in Brazil are strategically managing their practices in order to adapt to a new era in higher education throughout the development of dynamic capabilities. Relevance/originality: This research provides an in‐depth process analysis including the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities to the development and the advance of the third mission of the universities, contributing to the study’s originality. Management contributions: The managemental contribution of this study is to offer a view of new modes and practices for other universities that are seeking to operate in an entrepreneurial dimension.","PeriodicalId":356018,"journal":{"name":"REGEPE Entrepreneurship and Small Business Journal","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124031023","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：