Kristofel Aditya Prathama Pardamean Hutauruk, Ahmad Redi, S. Suparno
The weak legal position of the Indonesian state in tackling the problem of illegal immigrants has resulted in the Indonesian state no longer being a transit country for illegal immigrants from the Middle East to Australia but has become a destination country because the people in Indonesia are known to be friendly and welcoming in dealing with illegal immigrants who later became destination countries with the target of seeking political asylum, human smuggling agents deliberately made Indonesia a destination country for people smuggling. Various efforts have been made by obligated parties, such as the Police institution. The steps taken by the National Police so far have been to arrest illegal immigrants and smugglers, but the investigation process does not use the Special Law, but the Migration Law, so the results obtained do not show significant changes. After Indonesia's independence, Indonesia did not implement the previous policy, namely the "open door policy"; which is considered no longer appropriate. Therefore the Government of the Republic of Indonesia issued a new policy, namely a selective policy that allowed the entry of foreigners only according to their needs and provided benefits for the development of the State and the Government of the Republic of Indonesia.
{"title":"Selective Policy in Handling Illegal Immigrants","authors":"Kristofel Aditya Prathama Pardamean Hutauruk, Ahmad Redi, S. Suparno","doi":"10.59141/jiss.v4i05.814","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v4i05.814","url":null,"abstract":"The weak legal position of the Indonesian state in tackling the problem of illegal immigrants has resulted in the Indonesian state no longer being a transit country for illegal immigrants from the Middle East to Australia but has become a destination country because the people in Indonesia are known to be friendly and welcoming in dealing with illegal immigrants who later became destination countries with the target of seeking political asylum, human smuggling agents deliberately made Indonesia a destination country for people smuggling. Various efforts have been made by obligated parties, such as the Police institution. The steps taken by the National Police so far have been to arrest illegal immigrants and smugglers, but the investigation process does not use the Special Law, but the Migration Law, so the results obtained do not show significant changes. After Indonesia's independence, Indonesia did not implement the previous policy, namely the \"open door policy\"; which is considered no longer appropriate. Therefore the Government of the Republic of Indonesia issued a new policy, namely a selective policy that allowed the entry of foreigners only according to their needs and provided benefits for the development of the State and the Government of the Republic of Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":358924,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117154204","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In the overall set of laws in Indonesia, opiates misuse is qualified as a wrongdoing in the opiates area which is controlled in Regulation no. 35 of 2009 concerning Opiates. Opiates wrongdoing is viewed as a type of wrongdoing that has serious ramifications for the eventual fate of this country, obliterating life and the future, particularly for the more youthful age. As indicated by Article 127 passage (1) Regulation no. 35 of 2009, Each individual who mishandles Opiates Classification I for himself will be rebuffed with detainment for a limit of 4 (four) years; Each individual who manhandles Opiates Classification II for himself will be rebuffed with detainment for a limit of 2 (two) years; and Each victimizer of Opiates Class III for himself will be rebuffed with detainment for a limit of 1 (one) year. Concerning what is implied by victimizers are individuals who use opiates without privileges or are illegal. The Opiates Regulation plans to: Guarantee courses of action for clinical and social restoration endeavors for opiates victimizers and fiends", be that as it may, Article 54 of the Law states "Opiates Junkies and Casualties of Opiates Victimizers are expected to go through clinical recovery and social recovery". In light of Article 54, the right of victimizers to get recovery isn't perceived. Moreover, victimizers who get recovery ensures under 4 Regulation no. 35 of 2009, however in Article 127 victimizers are created subjects who can be sentenced and lose their recovery freedoms except if they can be demonstrated or shown to be survivors of opiates. Demonstrating that opiates victimizers are survivors of opiates is a troublesome matter since it should be seen from the start that opiates clients use opiates. Likewise, it is important to demonstrate that opiates clients while utilizing opiates are in a state of being convinced, deceived, misdirected, constrained, as well as taken steps to utilize opiates.
{"title":"Legal Position Between Narcotics Addicts and Narcotics Abusers in the Perspective of Law Number 35 of 2009 Concerning Narcotics","authors":"M. Munir, Riswadi Riswadi, Evita Isretno Israhadi","doi":"10.59141/jiss.v4i05.836","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v4i05.836","url":null,"abstract":"In the overall set of laws in Indonesia, opiates misuse is qualified as a wrongdoing in the opiates area which is controlled in Regulation no. 35 of 2009 concerning Opiates. Opiates wrongdoing is viewed as a type of wrongdoing that has serious ramifications for the eventual fate of this country, obliterating life and the future, particularly for the more youthful age. As indicated by Article 127 passage (1) Regulation no. 35 of 2009, Each individual who mishandles Opiates Classification I for himself will be rebuffed with detainment for a limit of 4 (four) years; Each individual who manhandles Opiates Classification II for himself will be rebuffed with detainment for a limit of 2 (two) years; and Each victimizer of Opiates Class III for himself will be rebuffed with detainment for a limit of 1 (one) year. Concerning what is implied by victimizers are individuals who use opiates without privileges or are illegal. The Opiates Regulation plans to: Guarantee courses of action for clinical and social restoration endeavors for opiates victimizers and fiends\", be that as it may, Article 54 of the Law states \"Opiates Junkies and Casualties of Opiates Victimizers are expected to go through clinical recovery and social recovery\". In light of Article 54, the right of victimizers to get recovery isn't perceived. Moreover, victimizers who get recovery ensures under 4 Regulation no. 35 of 2009, however in Article 127 victimizers are created subjects who can be sentenced and lose their recovery freedoms except if they can be demonstrated or shown to be survivors of opiates. Demonstrating that opiates victimizers are survivors of opiates is a troublesome matter since it should be seen from the start that opiates clients use opiates. Likewise, it is important to demonstrate that opiates clients while utilizing opiates are in a state of being convinced, deceived, misdirected, constrained, as well as taken steps to utilize opiates.","PeriodicalId":358924,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126066447","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Beginning on September 24, 1960, there were not any more western freedoms and standard terrains. The organization no longer exists while the freedoms have been changed over by the BAL into one of the new privileges. In such manner, beginning in 1961 there could have been as of now not any land that its arrangements could be dependent upon European Verponding, Indonesian Verponding, and Lanrente or Land Expense. The assessment endorsements that existed and were held by individuals around then and were not detailed for substitution of new privileges under the UUPA, were still as Eigendom Verponding. In any case, in all actuality, there are still holders of land privileges who after September 24, 1980, still have confirmation of responsibility for freedoms as western privileges and standard freedoms that poor person been changed over, which will create legitimate issues assuming that these are not directed in regulation. To expect lawful issues that emerge because of changes in guidelines in the land area, the public authority through transformation guidelines reaffirmed the lapse of privileges to the place that is known for beginning of the Change of Western Freedoms on September 24, 1980, which is likewise the standard framed in the BAL., to end the legitimacy of the excess Western privileges to land in Indonesia with every one of attributes are not by Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution
{"title":"Legal Status of Land Rights of the Former Eigendom Verponding After the Issuance of the Conversion Rules","authors":"M. Mahmuddin, Herman Bakir, Faisal Santiago","doi":"10.59141/jiss.v4i05.835","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v4i05.835","url":null,"abstract":"Beginning on September 24, 1960, there were not any more western freedoms and standard terrains. The organization no longer exists while the freedoms have been changed over by the BAL into one of the new privileges. In such manner, beginning in 1961 there could have been as of now not any land that its arrangements could be dependent upon European Verponding, Indonesian Verponding, and Lanrente or Land Expense. The assessment endorsements that existed and were held by individuals around then and were not detailed for substitution of new privileges under the UUPA, were still as Eigendom Verponding. In any case, in all actuality, there are still holders of land privileges who after September 24, 1980, still have confirmation of responsibility for freedoms as western privileges and standard freedoms that poor person been changed over, which will create legitimate issues assuming that these are not directed in regulation. To expect lawful issues that emerge because of changes in guidelines in the land area, the public authority through transformation guidelines reaffirmed the lapse of privileges to the place that is known for beginning of the Change of Western Freedoms on September 24, 1980, which is likewise the standard framed in the BAL., to end the legitimacy of the excess Western privileges to land in Indonesia with every one of attributes are not by Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution","PeriodicalId":358924,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127895826","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jamaluddin Sungsang, Evita Isretno Israhadi, Ahmad Redi
Training is a cognizant and arranged work to make a learning air and educational experience so understudies effectively foster their capability to have profound strength, poise, character, honorable person, and the abilities required without anyone else, society, country, and state. Without schooling that is by public character, the objectives of accomplishing instruction might be satisfied. The critical advancement of the country is the advancement of schooling possessed by the country. The exploration technique utilized is regulating legitimate examination which is expressive investigation. The design is to find the execution of legitimate security for educators in giving discipline to teach their understudies. In light of the consequences of the information examination, it was presumed that Regulation Number 14 of 2005 concerning educators and speakers has rigorously safeguarded the endlessly showing calling, yet at the degree of execution, the force of the law is as yet not seen to have added to the destiny of instructors as teachers. Moves made by instructors to train understudies inside specific cutoff points and are viewed as having satisfactory objectives by everybody can overrule criminal authorizations. Giving lawful security to educators in leading their expert duties is purposed.
{"title":"Legal Protection For Teachers In Implementing Student Disciplinary Assignments","authors":"Jamaluddin Sungsang, Evita Isretno Israhadi, Ahmad Redi","doi":"10.59141/jiss.v4i05.837","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v4i05.837","url":null,"abstract":"Training is a cognizant and arranged work to make a learning air and educational experience so understudies effectively foster their capability to have profound strength, poise, character, honorable person, and the abilities required without anyone else, society, country, and state. Without schooling that is by public character, the objectives of accomplishing instruction might be satisfied. The critical advancement of the country is the advancement of schooling possessed by the country. The exploration technique utilized is regulating legitimate examination which is expressive investigation. The design is to find the execution of legitimate security for educators in giving discipline to teach their understudies. In light of the consequences of the information examination, it was presumed that Regulation Number 14 of 2005 concerning educators and speakers has rigorously safeguarded the endlessly showing calling, yet at the degree of execution, the force of the law is as yet not seen to have added to the destiny of instructors as teachers. Moves made by instructors to train understudies inside specific cutoff points and are viewed as having satisfactory objectives by everybody can overrule criminal authorizations. Giving lawful security to educators in leading their expert duties is purposed.","PeriodicalId":358924,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132834142","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract. The presence of Regulation Number 8 of 1999 concerning Purchaser Insurance has concentrated a little since this Regulation controls the privileges and commitments of business entertainers and customers so they are safer and are supposed to turn into a legitimate umbrella for shoppers. Consumers need to know that they have the right to get protection when dealing with sellers or producers in conducting trade transactions so that when a loss occurs on the part of the consumer caused by the seller or producer, the consumer can demand that the seller or producer be responsible for the loss suffered by the consumer. The relationship between sellers as business actors to consumers must be maintained properly. The seller also knows whether there is anything to consider before being marketed or sent to consumers regarding the feasibility of the goods. The eligibility in question is the condition of the goods by the information submitted by the seller, according to what is in the advertisement, the seller has ethics when trading his goods. At the point when a misfortune is capable by the shopper, on the off chance that the proof states whether there was a component of mistake, it stays the obligation of the merchant, as expressed in Article 28 of Regulation Number 8 of 1999 concerning Customer Security.
{"title":"Legal Protection For Consumers Buying And Selling Electronic Goods With Defective Products","authors":"Ediyanto Arief, Boy Nurdin, Azis Budianto","doi":"10.59141/jiss.v4i05.823","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v4i05.823","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The presence of Regulation Number 8 of 1999 concerning Purchaser Insurance has concentrated a little since this Regulation controls the privileges and commitments of business entertainers and customers so they are safer and are supposed to turn into a legitimate umbrella for shoppers. Consumers need to know that they have the right to get protection when dealing with sellers or producers in conducting trade transactions so that when a loss occurs on the part of the consumer caused by the seller or producer, the consumer can demand that the seller or producer be responsible for the loss suffered by the consumer. The relationship between sellers as business actors to consumers must be maintained properly. The seller also knows whether there is anything to consider before being marketed or sent to consumers regarding the feasibility of the goods. The eligibility in question is the condition of the goods by the information submitted by the seller, according to what is in the advertisement, the seller has ethics when trading his goods. At the point when a misfortune is capable by the shopper, on the off chance that the proof states whether there was a component of mistake, it stays the obligation of the merchant, as expressed in Article 28 of Regulation Number 8 of 1999 concerning Customer Security.","PeriodicalId":358924,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128618865","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The fact that there is numerous abuse of narcotics and dangerous drugs in Indonesia today is inseparable from the many modes and justifications used by these abusers in carrying out their actions. The exploration is remembered for the regularizing juridical assessment, the strategy involved by the creator as the peculiarities concentrate on that happens connected with the utilization of helpful equity in drug cases has been performed at the examination site. The results are that the Crook Code Bill has thought about the age of the more established in the criminal system, by setting the age north of 75 years for guilty parties of criminal goes about very far they are not open to confinement. In the conversation of Article 72 of the Lawbreaker Code Bill, this age limit was deferred, between the time of "north of 70 years" or "more than 75 years" for culprits of criminal goes about quite far they were not expose to detainment. This arrangement was one of the issues forthcoming at the Detailing Group Meeting (Timus), yet at the accompanying Timus Meeting concurred that "mature more than 75 years" for culprits to try not to be condemned to jail quite far (become Article 76), considering the future that the higher it is. For the elderly who are caught in drug abuse cases, consider the interests of the perpetrators who act as victims by prioritizing rehabilitation efforts as the best way to return the perpetrators to the condition they were in before committing drug abuse
{"title":"Restorative Justice Crime Of Narcotics In The Elderly With Narcotic Evidence","authors":"Bayu Sasongko, Megawati Barthos, S. Suparno","doi":"10.59141/jiss.v4i05.826","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v4i05.826","url":null,"abstract":"The fact that there is numerous abuse of narcotics and dangerous drugs in Indonesia today is inseparable from the many modes and justifications used by these abusers in carrying out their actions. The exploration is remembered for the regularizing juridical assessment, the strategy involved by the creator as the peculiarities concentrate on that happens connected with the utilization of helpful equity in drug cases has been performed at the examination site. The results are that the Crook Code Bill has thought about the age of the more established in the criminal system, by setting the age north of 75 years for guilty parties of criminal goes about very far they are not open to confinement. In the conversation of Article 72 of the Lawbreaker Code Bill, this age limit was deferred, between the time of \"north of 70 years\" or \"more than 75 years\" for culprits of criminal goes about quite far they were not expose to detainment. This arrangement was one of the issues forthcoming at the Detailing Group Meeting (Timus), yet at the accompanying Timus Meeting concurred that \"mature more than 75 years\" for culprits to try not to be condemned to jail quite far (become Article 76), considering the future that the higher it is. For the elderly who are caught in drug abuse cases, consider the interests of the perpetrators who act as victims by prioritizing rehabilitation efforts as the best way to return the perpetrators to the condition they were in before committing drug abuse","PeriodicalId":358924,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126282918","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tessar Bayu Setyaji, Zudan Arief Fakrulloh, S. Suparno
Even though it is not a destination country, with the consequence of its geographical location, Indonesia is the final stopover for waves of asylum seekers and refugees going to the destination country, namely Australia. The presence of these illegal immigrants will raise demographic problems (population) and is related to social-economic conflicts and directly proportional to the crime rate. The fact that Indonesia is a country of transit for illegal immigrants is evident from the duration of their stay. As many as 17.50 percent of immigrant respondents stated that they lived in Indonesia for 2-4 weeks. It was that immigrants could pause for their next journey, change smuggling agents, or use transit as a separate strategy before entering Australian territory. Immigrants themselves when entering Indonesian territory must have valid documents by the laws and regulations in force in Indonesia as referred to in Article 8 paragraph (1) of Law Number 6 of 2011 concerning Immigration. Law enforcement against foreign nationals is aimed at issues of falsification of identity, lack of documents, registration of foreigners and provision of foreign control books, abuse of residence permits, illegal entry or stay illegal, expiry of stay permit, being in Indonesia outside monitoring by raids and geographic vulnerability in crossings.
{"title":"Implementation of Legal Policy in Indonesia in Handling Illegal Immigrants","authors":"Tessar Bayu Setyaji, Zudan Arief Fakrulloh, S. Suparno","doi":"10.59141/jiss.v4i05.813","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v4i05.813","url":null,"abstract":"Even though it is not a destination country, with the consequence of its geographical location, Indonesia is the final stopover for waves of asylum seekers and refugees going to the destination country, namely Australia. The presence of these illegal immigrants will raise demographic problems (population) and is related to social-economic conflicts and directly proportional to the crime rate. The fact that Indonesia is a country of transit for illegal immigrants is evident from the duration of their stay. As many as 17.50 percent of immigrant respondents stated that they lived in Indonesia for 2-4 weeks. It was that immigrants could pause for their next journey, change smuggling agents, or use transit as a separate strategy before entering Australian territory. Immigrants themselves when entering Indonesian territory must have valid documents by the laws and regulations in force in Indonesia as referred to in Article 8 paragraph (1) of Law Number 6 of 2011 concerning Immigration. Law enforcement against foreign nationals is aimed at issues of falsification of identity, lack of documents, registration of foreigners and provision of foreign control books, abuse of residence permits, illegal entry or stay illegal, expiry of stay permit, being in Indonesia outside monitoring by raids and geographic vulnerability in crossings.","PeriodicalId":358924,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124021159","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The reason for viciousness against understudies can happen on the grounds that educators don't grasp the significance of brutality and its unfortunate results. The instructor felt that the understudies would be stopped by whipping. Then again, understudies become angry and defiant to the educator. The conditions and background of acts of violence in education are strung together in a spiral relationship that can appear at any time, by any perpetrator who is involved in an educational institution, as long as there is a trigger for the incident. Recently, there have been various cases that occurred in the educational environment related to violence perpetrated by teachers against their students. Most of the occurrences are caused by the application of disciplinary norms that are too forced on students. Meanwhile, not all students are accustomed to disciplinary behavior. The wrong way of instilling discipline can be in the form of both physical and mental violence against children. The most visible thing is physical violence. It is not uncommon for this to go to court because parents feel they have been disadvantaged.
{"title":"Violent Crime Policies in the Teaching and Learning Process in a Criminal Law Perspective","authors":"Rohmatullah Rohmatullah, Zudan Arief Fakrulloh, Megawati Barthos","doi":"10.59141/jiss.v4i05.833","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v4i05.833","url":null,"abstract":"The reason for viciousness against understudies can happen on the grounds that educators don't grasp the significance of brutality and its unfortunate results. The instructor felt that the understudies would be stopped by whipping. Then again, understudies become angry and defiant to the educator. The conditions and background of acts of violence in education are strung together in a spiral relationship that can appear at any time, by any perpetrator who is involved in an educational institution, as long as there is a trigger for the incident. Recently, there have been various cases that occurred in the educational environment related to violence perpetrated by teachers against their students. Most of the occurrences are caused by the application of disciplinary norms that are too forced on students. Meanwhile, not all students are accustomed to disciplinary behavior. The wrong way of instilling discipline can be in the form of both physical and mental violence against children. The most visible thing is physical violence. It is not uncommon for this to go to court because parents feel they have been disadvantaged.","PeriodicalId":358924,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains","volume":"22 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"120913297","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Land ownership that is unfair to the community will offer opportunities for some parties to act undemocratically by taking land from the community. Conflict is a phenomenon that often occurs in human life, and arises from the conditions of the diversity of social systems. Conflict, no matter how it is seen, is inextricably linked with social existence. Property rights according to Article 20 paragraph (1) of the UUPA, namely hereditary, strongest, and fulfilled rights that people can own over land by considering that all land rights have a social function. The review utilizes a standardizing juridical methodology and the kind of legitimate survey is an extensive investigation of essential lawful materials, optional legitimate materials, and tertiary legitimate materials. The consequences of this exploration are the goal of land debate cases as specified in Regulation Number 51 of 1960, in Article 2 and Article 6 passage (1) letter a, that the utilization of land without consent from the legitimate individual or their lawful intermediary is a disallowed act and undermined with criminal punishments. Nonetheless, in tending to clashes and land debates that emerge, one should take a gander at it according to a few points of view while as yet focusing on equity and not hurting the two players, so it isn't just seen from the side of the inhabitant's activities yet additionally as far as the endlessly utilization of the land by the proprietor if, as far as usage, the land isn't used ideally and even appears to have been dismissed by the proprietor for roughly 15 years. Settlement of questions through consultation through intervention is followed as the way to taking care of land issues, remembering that the fundamental objective of intervention is to determine issues, apply standards or make request, yet in its execution, it should likewise be founded on broad standards
{"title":"Agrarian Law Enforcement In Land Dispute Settlement","authors":"Riza Endriyana, Faisal Santiago, S. Suparno","doi":"10.59141/jiss.v4i05.834","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v4i05.834","url":null,"abstract":"Land ownership that is unfair to the community will offer opportunities for some parties to act undemocratically by taking land from the community. Conflict is a phenomenon that often occurs in human life, and arises from the conditions of the diversity of social systems. Conflict, no matter how it is seen, is inextricably linked with social existence. Property rights according to Article 20 paragraph (1) of the UUPA, namely hereditary, strongest, and fulfilled rights that people can own over land by considering that all land rights have a social function. The review utilizes a standardizing juridical methodology and the kind of legitimate survey is an extensive investigation of essential lawful materials, optional legitimate materials, and tertiary legitimate materials. The consequences of this exploration are the goal of land debate cases as specified in Regulation Number 51 of 1960, in Article 2 and Article 6 passage (1) letter a, that the utilization of land without consent from the legitimate individual or their lawful intermediary is a disallowed act and undermined with criminal punishments. Nonetheless, in tending to clashes and land debates that emerge, one should take a gander at it according to a few points of view while as yet focusing on equity and not hurting the two players, so it isn't just seen from the side of the inhabitant's activities yet additionally as far as the endlessly utilization of the land by the proprietor if, as far as usage, the land isn't used ideally and even appears to have been dismissed by the proprietor for roughly 15 years. Settlement of questions through consultation through intervention is followed as the way to taking care of land issues, remembering that the fundamental objective of intervention is to determine issues, apply standards or make request, yet in its execution, it should likewise be founded on broad standards","PeriodicalId":358924,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains","volume":"52 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"120923040","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Business Competition Law in Indonesia adheres to a post-notification system which is carried out after the effective date in the process of taking over (mergers and acquisitions) of a company. Based on data on the KPPU's website, during the period from 2012 – 2022 there were 45 cases of fines for late notification in the merger and acquisition process with a total fine of Rp. 118,765,000,000. Data on company acquisition case decisions from 11 February 2020 to 11 April 2021, found delays in notifications of mergers and acquisitions with delays ranging from 2 (two) days to more than 8 (eight) years. One of the mitigating reasons in the KPPU's decision was the ignorance of business actors regarding the obligation to submit post-notification of company takeover to KPPU. In order to avoid this problem, in the future, it is expected that KPPU or the Government can amend the provisions concerning post-notification obligations to become pre-notification obligations.
{"title":"Analysis of Delayed Notification of Acquisition of Shares by Business Players Using the Cost Benefit Analysis and Regulatory Impact Analysis Methods","authors":"A. Ani","doi":"10.59141/jiss.v4i04.808","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v4i04.808","url":null,"abstract":"Business Competition Law in Indonesia adheres to a post-notification system which is carried out after the effective date in the process of taking over (mergers and acquisitions) of a company. Based on data on the KPPU's website, during the period from 2012 – 2022 there were 45 cases of fines for late notification in the merger and acquisition process with a total fine of Rp. 118,765,000,000. Data on company acquisition case decisions from 11 February 2020 to 11 April 2021, found delays in notifications of mergers and acquisitions with delays ranging from 2 (two) days to more than 8 (eight) years. One of the mitigating reasons in the KPPU's decision was the ignorance of business actors regarding the obligation to submit post-notification of company takeover to KPPU. In order to avoid this problem, in the future, it is expected that KPPU or the Government can amend the provisions concerning post-notification obligations to become pre-notification obligations.","PeriodicalId":358924,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains","volume":"133 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129535768","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：