Pub Date : 2023-12-01DOI: 10.46553/prudentia.96.2023.3
Juan Bautista Fos Medina
La influencia francesa en España es anterior al advenimiento de Felipe V al trono, el primer borbón español, incluso antes del “siglo de Luis XIV”. En efecto, Richelieu, en tanto precursor del Estado-Nación, dejó una impronta en otros reinos europeos. En el caso de España, dicho influjo se profundizó desde las primeras reformas borbónicas y se agudizó mediante las medidas centralistas de los ministros ilustrados. De manera que las innovaciones del llamado “despotismo ilustrado” reconocen su antecedente en el utilitarismo y absolutismo estatal, iniciado en la teoría por Maquiavelo y llevado a la praxis política por el célebre Cardenal francés. Con todo, si bien dicho absolutismo tiene una suerte de cuño francés, en realidad su originalidad se encuentra en los principios de la modernidad que afectaron, aunque en distinto grado, tanto a Francia como a España por el hecho de que ambos reinos, al menos desde el siglo XVIII, formaban parte de un mundo común.
{"title":"Del absolutismo francés al despotismo ilustrado en España: Influencia francesa y moderna","authors":"Juan Bautista Fos Medina","doi":"10.46553/prudentia.96.2023.3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.46553/prudentia.96.2023.3","url":null,"abstract":"La influencia francesa en España es anterior al advenimiento de Felipe V al trono, el primer borbón español, incluso antes del “siglo de Luis XIV”. En efecto, Richelieu, en tanto precursor del Estado-Nación, dejó una impronta en otros reinos europeos. En el caso de España, dicho influjo se profundizó desde las primeras reformas borbónicas y se agudizó mediante las medidas centralistas de los ministros ilustrados. De manera que las innovaciones del llamado “despotismo ilustrado” reconocen su antecedente en el utilitarismo y absolutismo estatal, iniciado en la teoría por Maquiavelo y llevado a la praxis política por el célebre Cardenal francés. Con todo, si bien dicho absolutismo tiene una suerte de cuño francés, en realidad su originalidad se encuentra en los principios de la modernidad que afectaron, aunque en distinto grado, tanto a Francia como a España por el hecho de que ambos reinos, al menos desde el siglo XVIII, formaban parte de un mundo común.","PeriodicalId":36086,"journal":{"name":"Prudentia Iuris","volume":" 27","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138612686","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-01DOI: 10.46553/prudentia.95.2023.pp.203-215
M. Nieto
: The opinion article addresses the ruling of the Supreme Court of Justice in the “Denegri” Case. The author maintains that it is not correct to consider all the in-formation regarding the plaintiff available on the web as being of “public interest”. In addition, she maintains that the statement that Denegri gave her “consent” for the expo-sure of her honor and privacy in the past, alleged by the High Court to reject the claim, is not correct either. In the Argentine legal system, the provision of very personal rights is not presumed, it is of restrictive interpretation, and freely revocable. There cannot have been consent to the indexing of the questioned content in the Google search engine at the time the events occurred –years 1996–, since Google Inc. was founded in 1998.
{"title":"Comentario al fallo de la Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación, ‘Denegri, Natalia Ruth c/ Google Inc. s/ derechos personalísimos: acciones relacionadas (expediente nº 50.016/2016)","authors":"M. Nieto","doi":"10.46553/prudentia.95.2023.pp.203-215","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.46553/prudentia.95.2023.pp.203-215","url":null,"abstract":": The opinion article addresses the ruling of the Supreme Court of Justice in the “Denegri” Case. The author maintains that it is not correct to consider all the in-formation regarding the plaintiff available on the web as being of “public interest”. In addition, she maintains that the statement that Denegri gave her “consent” for the expo-sure of her honor and privacy in the past, alleged by the High Court to reject the claim, is not correct either. In the Argentine legal system, the provision of very personal rights is not presumed, it is of restrictive interpretation, and freely revocable. There cannot have been consent to the indexing of the questioned content in the Google search engine at the time the events occurred –years 1996–, since Google Inc. was founded in 1998.","PeriodicalId":36086,"journal":{"name":"Prudentia Iuris","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44707449","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-01DOI: 10.46553/prudentia.95.2023.pp.47-60
T. Cordero
{"title":"¿Deben las democracias liberales aceptar argumentos religiosos en el debate público? Una reflexión a partir del pensamiento de Nicholas Wolterstorff y Joseph Ratzinger","authors":"T. Cordero","doi":"10.46553/prudentia.95.2023.pp.47-60","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.46553/prudentia.95.2023.pp.47-60","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36086,"journal":{"name":"Prudentia Iuris","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47355904","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-01DOI: 10.46553/prudentia.95.2023.pp.61-91
L. Laise
{"title":"Disculpe mi ignorancia: ¿Deben los jueces penales decidir con ‘perspectiva de género’?","authors":"L. Laise","doi":"10.46553/prudentia.95.2023.pp.61-91","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.46553/prudentia.95.2023.pp.61-91","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36086,"journal":{"name":"Prudentia Iuris","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48416527","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-01DOI: 10.46553/prudentia.95.2023.pp.123-143
Juan G. Navarro Floria
: Can someone be forced to kill a person, or to collaborate with the suicide of another? This is not a theoretical issue: there are currently at least five bills in Congress that promote the legalization of assisted suicide and euthanasia. In the present work I am only going to refer to the implications that they present for both individual and collective religious freedom and freedom of conscience in particular. But to situate the topic it is necessary to very briefly clarify some concepts.
{"title":"Colaboración con el suicidio y objeción de conciencia","authors":"Juan G. Navarro Floria","doi":"10.46553/prudentia.95.2023.pp.123-143","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.46553/prudentia.95.2023.pp.123-143","url":null,"abstract":": Can someone be forced to kill a person, or to collaborate with the suicide of another? This is not a theoretical issue: there are currently at least five bills in Congress that promote the legalization of assisted suicide and euthanasia. In the present work I am only going to refer to the implications that they present for both individual and collective religious freedom and freedom of conscience in particular. But to situate the topic it is necessary to very briefly clarify some concepts.","PeriodicalId":36086,"journal":{"name":"Prudentia Iuris","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44217129","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-01DOI: 10.46553/prudentia.95.2023.pp.29-45
Ignacio Salazar Schmidt
{"title":"Verdad cristiana y pluralismo democrático según Joseph Ratzinger","authors":"Ignacio Salazar Schmidt","doi":"10.46553/prudentia.95.2023.pp.29-45","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.46553/prudentia.95.2023.pp.29-45","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36086,"journal":{"name":"Prudentia Iuris","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44328259","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-01DOI: 10.46553/prudentia.95.2023.pp.181-200
Juan Ignacio Arias Krause
: What has been called the “second conversion” of Bartolomé de las Casas is a milestone that has served us to present an epistemological break that occurs in the Dominican’s thought. It is the transition from a utopian project –which seeks to achieve a model of social abundance based on a community between Spaniards and indigenous people– to another, which pursues the recognition of otherness (through the principles of equality and freedom) using legal thinking based on theological and cultural sources. What links both positions is a break with the social and political reality of the time, not only in Spain but especially in America. The clash between thought, whether utopian or juridical, with the material basis sustaining the political reality of the time will provoke an unavoidable “hiatus” in the practical application of his theory.
：Bartoloméde las Casas的“第二次皈依”是一个里程碑，它帮助我们呈现了多明尼加思想中发生的认识论突破。这是从一个乌托邦项目向另一个项目的过渡，该项目寻求建立在西班牙人和土著人民之间的社区基础上的社会富足模式，该项目利用基于神学和文化来源的法律思维（通过平等和自由原则）追求对他人性的承认。将这两种立场联系在一起的是与当时的社会和政治现实的决裂，不仅在西班牙，尤其是在美国。思想，无论是乌托邦的还是法律的，与维持当时政治现实的物质基础之间的冲突，将在他的理论的实际应用中引发不可避免的“中断”。
{"title":"Bartolomé de las Casas: Entre la utopía y el derecho abstracto","authors":"Juan Ignacio Arias Krause","doi":"10.46553/prudentia.95.2023.pp.181-200","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.46553/prudentia.95.2023.pp.181-200","url":null,"abstract":": What has been called the “second conversion” of Bartolomé de las Casas is a milestone that has served us to present an epistemological break that occurs in the Dominican’s thought. It is the transition from a utopian project –which seeks to achieve a model of social abundance based on a community between Spaniards and indigenous people– to another, which pursues the recognition of otherness (through the principles of equality and freedom) using legal thinking based on theological and cultural sources. What links both positions is a break with the social and political reality of the time, not only in Spain but especially in America. The clash between thought, whether utopian or juridical, with the material basis sustaining the political reality of the time will provoke an unavoidable “hiatus” in the practical application of his theory.","PeriodicalId":36086,"journal":{"name":"Prudentia Iuris","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47755409","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-01DOI: 10.46553/prudentia.95.2023.pp.93-122
María Goñi Rodríguez de Almeida
La concepción antropológica que subyace en las normas de derecho civil en España ha ido variando a lo largo de la historia, poniendo el foco en aspectos o di- mensiones parciales y aislados de la persona. En este trabajo se analizan críticamente estos cambios desde la perspectiva filosófica del personalismo. Se examina cómo se ha pasado de considerar a la persona como mero sujeto de derechos y obligaciones patri- moniales, a redescubrir la importancia de su dimensión social, o cómo, recientemente, las leyes reducen la persona a su pura voluntad olvidando el resto de sus elementos, analizando estas últimas con detenimiento. Después de ese análisis, se concluye que la antropología subyacente en el derecho civil español no coincide con la que aquí se de- fiende pues no procura la dignidad, igualdad y libertad de la persona, como ser de fines.
{"title":"La evolución del concepto de persona en el derecho civil español: antropología subyacente","authors":"María Goñi Rodríguez de Almeida","doi":"10.46553/prudentia.95.2023.pp.93-122","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.46553/prudentia.95.2023.pp.93-122","url":null,"abstract":"La concepción antropológica que subyace en las normas de derecho civil en España ha ido variando a lo largo de la historia, poniendo el foco en aspectos o di- mensiones parciales y aislados de la persona. En este trabajo se analizan críticamente estos cambios desde la perspectiva filosófica del personalismo. Se examina cómo se ha pasado de considerar a la persona como mero sujeto de derechos y obligaciones patri- moniales, a redescubrir la importancia de su dimensión social, o cómo, recientemente, las leyes reducen la persona a su pura voluntad olvidando el resto de sus elementos, analizando estas últimas con detenimiento. Después de ese análisis, se concluye que la antropología subyacente en el derecho civil español no coincide con la que aquí se de- fiende pues no procura la dignidad, igualdad y libertad de la persona, como ser de fines.","PeriodicalId":36086,"journal":{"name":"Prudentia Iuris","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136170343","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-01DOI: 10.46553/prudentia.95.2023.pp.145-180
Juan Manuel Paniagua
: This paper addresses the problem that arose in the ruling of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation, “Institutos Médicos Antártida s/ bankruptcy s/ verification incident” of 2019, in which the judges of that court granted the actor a privilege outside the system regulated in the bankruptcy and bankruptcy law to a creditor verified as unsecured in the liquidation contest of said hospital. Thus declaring the unconstitutionality of the regime and taking refuge in indefinite concepts, such as the dignity of the human person, leaving aside the fine regulatory plexus on the matter. With the par-ticularity of having dictated, the same court only 5 months before the sentence “French Philanthropic Association [...] s/ bankruptcy s/ inc. credit verification by L.A.R. and others” in a case with multiple similarities, having resolved the constitutionality of the regime, the application of the rules on bankruptcy preferences and the non-granting of the privilege invoked by the plaintiff.
本文解决了2019年国家最高法院裁决“Institutos m / s/破产/核查事件”中出现的问题，其中该法院的法官授予行为者在破产和破产法规定的制度之外的特权给在该医院的清算竞争中被证实为无担保的债权人。因此，宣布该政权违宪，并在不确定的概念中寻求庇护，例如人的尊严，将这个问题上的精细监管丛放在一边。随着特殊性的口授，同一法院仅在5个月前判决“法国慈善协会[…]在一个具有多重相似之处的案件中，解决了制度的合宪性，破产优先权规则的适用以及原告所援引的特权的不授予。
{"title":"Los privilegios de los acreedores involuntarios dentro del régimen concursal vigente a la luz del fallo ‘Institutos Médicos Antártida’ de la Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación","authors":"Juan Manuel Paniagua","doi":"10.46553/prudentia.95.2023.pp.145-180","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.46553/prudentia.95.2023.pp.145-180","url":null,"abstract":": This paper addresses the problem that arose in the ruling of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation, “Institutos Médicos Antártida s/ bankruptcy s/ verification incident” of 2019, in which the judges of that court granted the actor a privilege outside the system regulated in the bankruptcy and bankruptcy law to a creditor verified as unsecured in the liquidation contest of said hospital. Thus declaring the unconstitutionality of the regime and taking refuge in indefinite concepts, such as the dignity of the human person, leaving aside the fine regulatory plexus on the matter. With the par-ticularity of having dictated, the same court only 5 months before the sentence “French Philanthropic Association [...] s/ bankruptcy s/ inc. credit verification by L.A.R. and others” in a case with multiple similarities, having resolved the constitutionality of the regime, the application of the rules on bankruptcy preferences and the non-granting of the privilege invoked by the plaintiff.","PeriodicalId":36086,"journal":{"name":"Prudentia Iuris","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47463656","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-01DOI: 10.46553/prudentia.95.2023.pp.23-25
María Cecilia Barnech Cuervo
La dignidad a debate. Usos del concepto en la jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos es una obra colectiva realizada en el marco de un proyecto de investigación, dirigido por Jorge Nicolás Laffe- rriere, acerca del uso del concepto de dignidad humana por la Corte Intera- mericana de Derechos Humanos (Corte IDH).
{"title":"Lafferrière, Jorge y Lell, Helga (Eds.). La dignidad a debate. Usos del concepto en la jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos, 2021, 218 PP.","authors":"María Cecilia Barnech Cuervo","doi":"10.46553/prudentia.95.2023.pp.23-25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.46553/prudentia.95.2023.pp.23-25","url":null,"abstract":"La dignidad a debate. Usos del concepto en la jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos es una obra colectiva realizada en el marco de un proyecto de investigación, dirigido por Jorge Nicolás Laffe- rriere, acerca del uso del concepto de dignidad humana por la Corte Intera- mericana de Derechos Humanos (Corte IDH).","PeriodicalId":36086,"journal":{"name":"Prudentia Iuris","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136170341","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：