Fatema Khatun, Novel Chandra Das, Md Rakibul Hoque, Kazi Nazmus Saqeeb, Monjur Rahman, Kyung Ryul Park, Sabrina Rasheed, Daniel D Reidpath
Background: COVID-19 created an opportunity for using teleconsultation as an alternative way of accessing expert medical advice. Bangladesh has seen a 20-fold increase in the use of teleconsultation during the pandemic.
Objective: The aim of our study was to assess the influence of service quality and user satisfaction on the intention to use teleconsultation in the future among users of national teleconsultation services during the pandemic.
Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 2020 among users of the national teleconsultation service-Shastho Batayon for acute respiratory infection. A validated mobile health service quality model based on structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis was used to analyze the data with SmartPLS (version 3.0).
Results: Among the 2097 study participants, 1646 (78.5%) were male, 1416 (67.5%) were aged 18-39 years, 1588 (75.7%) were urban residents, 1348 (64.2%) had more than 10 years of schooling, and 1657 (79%) were from middle-income households. From a consumer perspective, the quality of the service platform (β=.946), service interaction (β=.974), and outcome (β=.955) contributed to service quality. Service quality was positively associated with user satisfaction (β=.327; P<.001) and intention to use teleconsultation services (β=.102; P<.001). User satisfaction was positively associated with the intention to use teleconsultation services (β=.311; P<.001).
Conclusions: The increase in the use of teleconsultation during the pandemic indicated that such services were potentially used for emergencies. However, the future use of teleconsultation will be dependent on the quality of service and user satisfaction. Our findings are relevant for low-income contexts where teleconsultation services are used to address gaps in service delivery.
{"title":"Users' Perceived Service Quality of National Telemedicine Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Bangladesh: Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Fatema Khatun, Novel Chandra Das, Md Rakibul Hoque, Kazi Nazmus Saqeeb, Monjur Rahman, Kyung Ryul Park, Sabrina Rasheed, Daniel D Reidpath","doi":"10.2196/46566","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2196/46566","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>COVID-19 created an opportunity for using teleconsultation as an alternative way of accessing expert medical advice. Bangladesh has seen a 20-fold increase in the use of teleconsultation during the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of our study was to assess the influence of service quality and user satisfaction on the intention to use teleconsultation in the future among users of national teleconsultation services during the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 2020 among users of the national teleconsultation service-Shastho Batayon for acute respiratory infection. A validated mobile health service quality model based on structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis was used to analyze the data with SmartPLS (version 3.0).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 2097 study participants, 1646 (78.5%) were male, 1416 (67.5%) were aged 18-39 years, 1588 (75.7%) were urban residents, 1348 (64.2%) had more than 10 years of schooling, and 1657 (79%) were from middle-income households. From a consumer perspective, the quality of the service platform (β=.946), service interaction (β=.974), and outcome (β=.955) contributed to service quality. Service quality was positively associated with user satisfaction (β=.327; P<.001) and intention to use teleconsultation services (β=.102; P<.001). User satisfaction was positively associated with the intention to use teleconsultation services (β=.311; P<.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The increase in the use of teleconsultation during the pandemic indicated that such services were potentially used for emergencies. However, the future use of teleconsultation will be dependent on the quality of service and user satisfaction. Our findings are relevant for low-income contexts where teleconsultation services are used to address gaps in service delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":36351,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Human Factors","volume":"11 ","pages":"e46566"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142915844","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Juliana Supplieth, Sonia Lech, Julie Lorraine O'Sullivan, Robert Spang, Jan-Niklas Voigt-Antons, Johanna Schuster
Background: Dementia management presents a significant challenge for individuals affected by dementia, as well as their families, caregivers, and health care providers. Digital applications may support those living with dementia; however only a few dementia-friendly applications exist.
Objective: This paper emphasizes the necessity of considering multiple perspectives to ensure the high-quality development of supportive health care applications. The findings underscore the importance of incorporating input from stakeholders and the needs of affected families into application development.
Methods: A qualitative approach was chosen, consisting of three interviews and an expert workshop. The interviews and the workshop were recorded and transcribed, and qualitative content analysis was carried out according to the methodology described by Kuckartz with the support of MAXQDA.
Results: During the development phases of the application, team meetings and discussions took place. We found that general practitioners and family caregivers play pivotal roles in the treatment and care of people with dementia, often expressing specific preferences and suggestions regarding supportive and assistive technologies. Moreover, the successful development of a useful tablet application requires robust scientific and multidisciplinary discussions and teamwork within the health care community.
Conclusions: This paper underscores the necessity of including multiple scientific, clinical, and technical perspectives to ensure the high-quality development of supportive health care applications. Furthermore, adopting a spiral development approach inclusive of feedback loops is imperative for iterative refinement and enhancement of the application.
{"title":"Development of a Tablet-Based Outpatient Care Application for People With Dementia: Interview and Workshop Study.","authors":"Juliana Supplieth, Sonia Lech, Julie Lorraine O'Sullivan, Robert Spang, Jan-Niklas Voigt-Antons, Johanna Schuster","doi":"10.2196/59865","DOIUrl":"10.2196/59865","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dementia management presents a significant challenge for individuals affected by dementia, as well as their families, caregivers, and health care providers. Digital applications may support those living with dementia; however only a few dementia-friendly applications exist.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This paper emphasizes the necessity of considering multiple perspectives to ensure the high-quality development of supportive health care applications. The findings underscore the importance of incorporating input from stakeholders and the needs of affected families into application development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative approach was chosen, consisting of three interviews and an expert workshop. The interviews and the workshop were recorded and transcribed, and qualitative content analysis was carried out according to the methodology described by Kuckartz with the support of MAXQDA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the development phases of the application, team meetings and discussions took place. We found that general practitioners and family caregivers play pivotal roles in the treatment and care of people with dementia, often expressing specific preferences and suggestions regarding supportive and assistive technologies. Moreover, the successful development of a useful tablet application requires robust scientific and multidisciplinary discussions and teamwork within the health care community.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This paper underscores the necessity of including multiple scientific, clinical, and technical perspectives to ensure the high-quality development of supportive health care applications. Furthermore, adopting a spiral development approach inclusive of feedback loops is imperative for iterative refinement and enhancement of the application.</p>","PeriodicalId":36351,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Human Factors","volume":"11 ","pages":"e59865"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11683740/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142898208","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Currently, 30 million children are experiencing acute malnutrition, and 8 million children are severely underweight.
Objective: This study aimed to develop a stunting super app, a one-stop app designed to prevent and manage stunting in Indonesia.
Methods: This study consisted of three stages. Stage 1 used a 3-round Delphi study involving 12 experts. In stage 2, 4 experts and a parent of children with stunted growth created an Android app containing stunting educational materials. In stage 3, a pilot study involving a control group was conducted to evaluate parents' knowledge about stunting prevention through the app and standard interventions.
Results: In the Delphi study, 11 consensus statements were extracted; arranged in three major themes, including maternal health education, child health education, and environmental education; and applied in the form of the Sistem Evaluasi Kesehatan Anak Tumbuh Ideal (SEHATI) app. This app was assessed using a content validity index, with a cumulative agreement of ≥80% among the 5 individuals. The pilot study showed an increase in the knowledge of mothers of toddlers with stunted growth before and after the educational intervention (P=.001).
Conclusions: The SEHATI app provides educational content on stunting prevention that can increase the knowledge of mothers of toddlers with stunted growth.
背景:目前有 3000 万儿童严重营养不良,800 万儿童体重严重不足:目前,有3000万儿童严重营养不良,800万儿童体重严重不足:本研究旨在开发一款 "发育迟缓超级应用程序",这是一款旨在预防和管理印度尼西亚儿童发育迟缓的一站式应用程序:本研究包括三个阶段。第一阶段采用三轮德尔菲法研究,共有 12 位专家参与。在第 2 阶段,4 位专家和一位发育迟缓儿童的家长创建了一个包含发育迟缓教育材料的 Android 应用程序。在第 3 阶段,开展了一项有对照组参与的试点研究,以评估家长对通过应用程序和标准干预措施预防发育迟缓的了解程度:在德尔菲研究中,提取了 11 项共识声明,将其分为三大主题,包括孕产妇健康教育、儿童健康教育和环境教育,并以 Sistem Evaluasi Kesehatan Anak Tumbuh Ideal (SEHATI) 应用程序的形式加以应用。该应用程序采用内容有效性指数进行评估,5 个人之间的累计一致性≥80%。试点研究显示,在教育干预前后,发育迟缓幼儿母亲的知识水平均有所提高(P=.001):SEHATI应用程序提供了预防发育迟缓的教育内容,可以增加发育迟缓幼儿母亲的知识。
{"title":"Stunting Super App as an Effort Toward Stunting Management in Indonesia: Delphi and Pilot Study.","authors":"Kadek Ayu Erika, Nur Fadilah, Aulia Insani Latif, Nurhikmawaty Hasbiah, Aidah Juliaty, Harun Achmad, Anugrayani Bustamin","doi":"10.2196/54862","DOIUrl":"10.2196/54862","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently, 30 million children are experiencing acute malnutrition, and 8 million children are severely underweight.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to develop a stunting super app, a one-stop app designed to prevent and manage stunting in Indonesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study consisted of three stages. Stage 1 used a 3-round Delphi study involving 12 experts. In stage 2, 4 experts and a parent of children with stunted growth created an Android app containing stunting educational materials. In stage 3, a pilot study involving a control group was conducted to evaluate parents' knowledge about stunting prevention through the app and standard interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the Delphi study, 11 consensus statements were extracted; arranged in three major themes, including maternal health education, child health education, and environmental education; and applied in the form of the Sistem Evaluasi Kesehatan Anak Tumbuh Ideal (SEHATI) app. This app was assessed using a content validity index, with a cumulative agreement of ≥80% among the 5 individuals. The pilot study showed an increase in the knowledge of mothers of toddlers with stunted growth before and after the educational intervention (P=.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SEHATI app provides educational content on stunting prevention that can increase the knowledge of mothers of toddlers with stunted growth.</p>","PeriodicalId":36351,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Human Factors","volume":"11 ","pages":"e54862"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11668187/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142839820","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Aimee-Rose Wrightson-Hester, Georgia Anderson, Joel Dunstan, Peter M McEvoy, Christopher J Sutton, Bronwyn Myers, Sarah Egan, Sara Tai, Melanie Johnston-Hollitt, Wai Chen, Tom Gedeon, Warren Mansell
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.2196/46849.].
[更正文章DOI: 10.2196/46849]。
{"title":"Correction: An Artificial Therapist (Manage Your Life Online) to Support the Mental Health of Youth: Co-Design and Case Series.","authors":"Aimee-Rose Wrightson-Hester, Georgia Anderson, Joel Dunstan, Peter M McEvoy, Christopher J Sutton, Bronwyn Myers, Sarah Egan, Sara Tai, Melanie Johnston-Hollitt, Wai Chen, Tom Gedeon, Warren Mansell","doi":"10.2196/69628","DOIUrl":"10.2196/69628","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[This corrects the article DOI: 10.2196/46849.].</p>","PeriodicalId":36351,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Human Factors","volume":"11 ","pages":"e69628"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11694599/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142839765","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Brian E Bunnell, Kaitlyn R Schuler, Julia Ivanova, Lea Flynn, Janelle F Barrera, Jasmine Niazi, Dylan Turner, Brandon M Welch
Background: Homework is implemented with variable effectiveness in real-world therapy settings, indicating a need for innovative solutions to homework challenges. We developed Adhere.ly, a user-friendly, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant web-based platform to help therapists implement homework with youth clients and their caregivers. The initial version had limited functionality, was designed for youth clients and their caregivers, and required expanding available features and exercises to suit adult clients.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to better understand barriers and potential solutions to homework implementation experienced by therapists seeing adult clients and obtain their input on new features and exercises that would enable Adhere.ly to better meet their needs when working with this population.
Methods: This study used an exploratory, sequential mixed methods design that included 13 semistructured focus groups with mental health therapists and clinic leaders and a survey administered to 100 therapists. Analyses were performed using the NVivo qualitative analysis software and SPSS.
Results: The findings revealed common barriers, such as clients and therapists being busy, forgetting to complete homework, managing multiple platforms and homework materials, and clients lacking motivation. Adhere.ly was perceived as a potential solution, particularly its user-friendly interface and SMS text-message based reminders. Therapists suggested integrating Adhere.ly with telemedicine and electronic health record platforms and adding more exercises to support manualized therapy protocols and therapy guides.
Conclusions: This study highlights the importance of technology-based solutions in addressing barriers to homework implementation in mental health treatment with adult clients. Adhere.ly shows promise in addressing these challenges and has the potential to improve therapy efficiency and homework completion rates. The input from therapists informed the development of Adhere.ly, guiding the expansion of features and exercises to better meet the needs of therapists working with adult clients.
背景:在现实世界的治疗环境中,家庭作业的实施效果各不相同,这表明需要创新的解决方案来应对家庭作业的挑战。我们开发了坚持。这是一个用户友好的、符合《健康保险可携带性和责任法案》(Health Insurance Portability and Accountability act)的基于网络的平台,帮助治疗师为青少年客户及其照顾者实施家庭作业。最初的版本功能有限,是为青少年客户和他们的照顾者设计的,需要扩展可用的功能和练习来适应成人客户。目的:本研究的目的是为了更好地理解治疗师在面对成年来访者时遇到的障碍和潜在的解决方案,并获得他们对新特征和练习的输入,以实现坚持。在与这一人群合作时,如何更好地满足他们的需求。方法:本研究采用探索性、顺序混合方法设计,包括13个半结构化焦点小组,包括心理健康治疗师和诊所负责人,并对100名治疗师进行调查。采用NVivo定性分析软件和SPSS进行分析。结果:研究结果揭示了常见的障碍,如来访者和治疗师都很忙,忘记完成作业,管理多个平台和作业材料,来访者缺乏动力。坚持。ly被认为是一个潜在的解决方案,尤其是它用户友好的界面和基于短信的提醒。治疗师建议整合坚持。与远程医疗和电子健康记录平台合作,并增加更多练习以支持手动治疗方案和治疗指南。结论:本研究强调了以技术为基础的解决方案在解决成人心理健康治疗中作业实施障碍的重要性。坚持。Ly有望解决这些挑战,并有可能提高治疗效率和家庭作业完成率。来自治疗师的意见影响了坚持疗法的发展。引导功能和练习的扩展,以更好地满足治疗师与成人客户合作的需求。
{"title":"Expanding a Health Technology Solution to Address Therapist Challenges in Implementing Homework With Adult Clients: Mixed Methods Study.","authors":"Brian E Bunnell, Kaitlyn R Schuler, Julia Ivanova, Lea Flynn, Janelle F Barrera, Jasmine Niazi, Dylan Turner, Brandon M Welch","doi":"10.2196/56567","DOIUrl":"10.2196/56567","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Homework is implemented with variable effectiveness in real-world therapy settings, indicating a need for innovative solutions to homework challenges. We developed Adhere.ly, a user-friendly, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant web-based platform to help therapists implement homework with youth clients and their caregivers. The initial version had limited functionality, was designed for youth clients and their caregivers, and required expanding available features and exercises to suit adult clients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to better understand barriers and potential solutions to homework implementation experienced by therapists seeing adult clients and obtain their input on new features and exercises that would enable Adhere.ly to better meet their needs when working with this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used an exploratory, sequential mixed methods design that included 13 semistructured focus groups with mental health therapists and clinic leaders and a survey administered to 100 therapists. Analyses were performed using the NVivo qualitative analysis software and SPSS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings revealed common barriers, such as clients and therapists being busy, forgetting to complete homework, managing multiple platforms and homework materials, and clients lacking motivation. Adhere.ly was perceived as a potential solution, particularly its user-friendly interface and SMS text-message based reminders. Therapists suggested integrating Adhere.ly with telemedicine and electronic health record platforms and adding more exercises to support manualized therapy protocols and therapy guides.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the importance of technology-based solutions in addressing barriers to homework implementation in mental health treatment with adult clients. Adhere.ly shows promise in addressing these challenges and has the potential to improve therapy efficiency and homework completion rates. The input from therapists informed the development of Adhere.ly, guiding the expansion of features and exercises to better meet the needs of therapists working with adult clients.</p>","PeriodicalId":36351,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Human Factors","volume":"11 ","pages":"e56567"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11671782/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142814460","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Emergency nurses actively manage the flow of patients through emergency departments. Patient flow management is complex, cognitively demanding work that shapes the timeliness, efficiency, and safety of patient care. Research exploring nursing patient flow management is limited. A comprehensive analysis of emergency nursing work systems is needed to improve patient flow work processes.
Objective: The aim of this paper is to describe the work system factors that impact emergency nurse patient flow management using the System Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety model.
Methods: This study used grounded theory methodologies. Data were collected through multiple rounds of focus groups and interviews with 27 emergency nurse participants and 64 hours of participant observation across 4 emergency departments between August 2022 and February 2023. Data were analyzed using coding, constant comparative analysis, and memo-writing. Emergent themes were organized according to the first component of the System Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety model, the work system.
Results: Patient flow management is impacted by diverse factors, including personal nursing characteristics; tools and technology; external factors; and the emergency department's physical and socio-organizational environment. Participants raised concerns about the available technology's functionality, usability, and accessibility; departmental capacity and layout; resource levels across the health care system; and interdepartmental teamwork. Other noteworthy findings include obscurity and variability across departments' staff roles titles, functions, and norms; the degree of provider involvement in patient flow management decisions; and management's enforcement of timing metrics.
Conclusions: There are significant barriers to the work of emergency patient flow management. More research is needed to measure the impact of these human factors on patient flow outcomes. Collaboration between health care administrators, human factors engineers, and nurses is needed to improve emergency nurse work systems.
{"title":"Work Systems Analysis of Emergency Nurse Patient Flow Management Using the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety Model: Applying Findings From a Grounded Theory Study.","authors":"Ellen Benjamin, Karen K Giuliano","doi":"10.2196/60176","DOIUrl":"10.2196/60176","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency nurses actively manage the flow of patients through emergency departments. Patient flow management is complex, cognitively demanding work that shapes the timeliness, efficiency, and safety of patient care. Research exploring nursing patient flow management is limited. A comprehensive analysis of emergency nursing work systems is needed to improve patient flow work processes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this paper is to describe the work system factors that impact emergency nurse patient flow management using the System Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used grounded theory methodologies. Data were collected through multiple rounds of focus groups and interviews with 27 emergency nurse participants and 64 hours of participant observation across 4 emergency departments between August 2022 and February 2023. Data were analyzed using coding, constant comparative analysis, and memo-writing. Emergent themes were organized according to the first component of the System Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety model, the work system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patient flow management is impacted by diverse factors, including personal nursing characteristics; tools and technology; external factors; and the emergency department's physical and socio-organizational environment. Participants raised concerns about the available technology's functionality, usability, and accessibility; departmental capacity and layout; resource levels across the health care system; and interdepartmental teamwork. Other noteworthy findings include obscurity and variability across departments' staff roles titles, functions, and norms; the degree of provider involvement in patient flow management decisions; and management's enforcement of timing metrics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are significant barriers to the work of emergency patient flow management. More research is needed to measure the impact of these human factors on patient flow outcomes. Collaboration between health care administrators, human factors engineers, and nurses is needed to improve emergency nurse work systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":36351,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Human Factors","volume":"11 ","pages":"e60176"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11651224/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142802529","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Adam K Lewkowitz, Melissa Guillen, Katrina Ursino, Rackeem Baker, Liana Lum, Cynthia L Battle, Crystal Ware, Nina K Ayala, Melissa Clark, Megan L Ranney, Emily S Miller, Kate M Guthrie
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low-income pregnant patients are at high risk of postpartum depression (PPD). Mothers and Babies (MB) is a cognitive behavioral therapy-based program that prevents up to 50% of de novo PPD when provided in person to low-income Spanish- and English-speaking people who are pregnant without depression. MB is limited by the need for trained personnel to support it. Transforming MB into a smartphone app may mitigate this key barrier.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to use qualitative data from target end users to create and optimize MBapp, a novel app centered on the MB program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Draft wireframes of MBapp were created in English and Spanish with cognitive behavioral therapy-based modules adapted from MB. These wireframes included several features shown previously to sustain app engagement: (1) push notifications delivered at participant-preferred times; (2) text-, graphic-, and video-based content; and (3) gamification with digital rewards for app engagement. English- or Spanish-speaking individuals with public health insurance who were between 32 weeks gestation and 6 months post partum and owned smartphones were eligible to consent for individual in-depth interviews. Individuals with prior or current depression were excluded. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using deductive and inductive codes to characterize opinions about MBapp and perceptions of challenges and facilitators of use of MBapp or other perinatal or mental health apps. End user feedback led to major modifications to the wireframes. Each of these changes was categorized according to the FRAME (Framework for Modification and Adaptation), an established method of systematically reporting adaptations and modifications to evidence-based interventions via end user feedback. Recruitment ceased with content saturation, defined as 3 successive participants providing only positive feedback on MBapp's wireframe, without further suggestions for improvement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 25 interviews were completed. Participants were racially and ethnically diverse, generally representing our target end user population, and 48% (n=12) of interviews were conducted in Spanish. Participants' suggestions to improve MBapp were categorized within the FRAME as adaptations that improved either content or context to optimize reach, retention, engagement, and fit for end users. Specifically, the following features were added to MBapp secondary to end user feedback: (1) audio narration; (2) "ask a clinician" nonurgent questions; (3) on-demand module summaries accessible upon module completion; and (4) choice to defer assessments and start the next module. Participants also provided insights into features of perinatal or mental health apps they found appealing or unappealing to understand preferences, challenges, and negotiables or nonnegotiables for MBapp.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adapting MBa
{"title":"Optimizing a Novel Smartphone App to Prevent Postpartum Depression Adapted From an Evidence-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Program: Qualitative Study.","authors":"Adam K Lewkowitz, Melissa Guillen, Katrina Ursino, Rackeem Baker, Liana Lum, Cynthia L Battle, Crystal Ware, Nina K Ayala, Melissa Clark, Megan L Ranney, Emily S Miller, Kate M Guthrie","doi":"10.2196/63143","DOIUrl":"10.2196/63143","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low-income pregnant patients are at high risk of postpartum depression (PPD). Mothers and Babies (MB) is a cognitive behavioral therapy-based program that prevents up to 50% of de novo PPD when provided in person to low-income Spanish- and English-speaking people who are pregnant without depression. MB is limited by the need for trained personnel to support it. Transforming MB into a smartphone app may mitigate this key barrier.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to use qualitative data from target end users to create and optimize MBapp, a novel app centered on the MB program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Draft wireframes of MBapp were created in English and Spanish with cognitive behavioral therapy-based modules adapted from MB. These wireframes included several features shown previously to sustain app engagement: (1) push notifications delivered at participant-preferred times; (2) text-, graphic-, and video-based content; and (3) gamification with digital rewards for app engagement. English- or Spanish-speaking individuals with public health insurance who were between 32 weeks gestation and 6 months post partum and owned smartphones were eligible to consent for individual in-depth interviews. Individuals with prior or current depression were excluded. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using deductive and inductive codes to characterize opinions about MBapp and perceptions of challenges and facilitators of use of MBapp or other perinatal or mental health apps. End user feedback led to major modifications to the wireframes. Each of these changes was categorized according to the FRAME (Framework for Modification and Adaptation), an established method of systematically reporting adaptations and modifications to evidence-based interventions via end user feedback. Recruitment ceased with content saturation, defined as 3 successive participants providing only positive feedback on MBapp's wireframe, without further suggestions for improvement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 25 interviews were completed. Participants were racially and ethnically diverse, generally representing our target end user population, and 48% (n=12) of interviews were conducted in Spanish. Participants' suggestions to improve MBapp were categorized within the FRAME as adaptations that improved either content or context to optimize reach, retention, engagement, and fit for end users. Specifically, the following features were added to MBapp secondary to end user feedback: (1) audio narration; (2) \"ask a clinician\" nonurgent questions; (3) on-demand module summaries accessible upon module completion; and (4) choice to defer assessments and start the next module. Participants also provided insights into features of perinatal or mental health apps they found appealing or unappealing to understand preferences, challenges, and negotiables or nonnegotiables for MBapp.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adapting MBa","PeriodicalId":36351,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Human Factors","volume":"11 ","pages":"e63143"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11649202/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142802528","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Christine Jacob, Roman Müller, Sonja Schüler, Alix Rey, Guillaume Rey, Berj Armenian, Alain Vonlaufen, Michael Drepper, Marius Zimmerli
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colonoscopies, are vital for initial screening, follow-ups, surveillance of neoplasia, and assessing symptoms like rectal bleeding. Successful colonoscopies require thorough colon preparation, but up to 25% fail due to poor preparation. This can lead to longer procedures, repeat colonoscopies, inconvenience, poorer health outcomes, and higher costs. eHealth tools can enhance bowel preparation and potentially reduce the need for repeat procedures.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This usability study aimed to identify strengths and weaknesses in a prototype companion app for colonoscopy exams. The objective was to obtain in-depth insights into the app's usability, ease of use, and content comprehension, with the objective of refining the tool to effectively fulfil its intended purpose, guided by feedback from potential users.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From February to August 2024, we conducted a qualitative study using the think-aloud (TA) procedure. Each session involved 6 tasks and a semi-structured interview to delve deeper into participants' task experiences. All TA sessions and interviews were recorded. Quantitative usability questions were analysed using Microsoft Excel, while qualitative data underwent coding and analysis based on thematic analysis principles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 17 individuals, all smartphone users, participated in this study. Participants were recruited from one hospital, one private clinic, and one patient organisation in Switzerland. The study found that participants rated the app's usability metrics positively, with an overall mean rating of ease of use at 4.29 (SD 0.59), usefulness at 4.53 (SD 0.72), and comprehensibility at 4.29 (SD 0.92). For the individual features, the mean ratings for ease of use were between 4.00 and 4.65, usefulness ranged from 4.35 to 4.82, and comprehensibility received ratings between 4.29 and 4.53, all measured on a 5-point scale, where 1 represented low agreement and 5 indicated high agreement. Additionally, 100% of participants indicated they will or may use the app if they require a colonoscopy exam. Participants highlighted the need for reminders and alerts in the week leading up to the colonoscopy, along with tailored content, simplified language, and visual aids.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The app prototype demonstrated favourable results with the majority of participants, and the testing process enabled the prompt identification and resolution of usability issues. The next phase will prioritize and assess potential improvements based on urgency and feasibility to guide a focused development plan. Usability testing highlighted features like push notifications and personalised content as top priorities for participants, making them key areas for immediate attention. Moving forward, the app has the potential to function effectively as a companion app for colonoscopy exams. To achieve this, further studies with a large
{"title":"Think-Aloud Testing of a Companion App for Colonoscopy Exams: Usability Study.","authors":"Christine Jacob, Roman Müller, Sonja Schüler, Alix Rey, Guillaume Rey, Berj Armenian, Alain Vonlaufen, Michael Drepper, Marius Zimmerli","doi":"10.2196/67043","DOIUrl":"10.2196/67043","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colonoscopies, are vital for initial screening, follow-ups, surveillance of neoplasia, and assessing symptoms like rectal bleeding. Successful colonoscopies require thorough colon preparation, but up to 25% fail due to poor preparation. This can lead to longer procedures, repeat colonoscopies, inconvenience, poorer health outcomes, and higher costs. eHealth tools can enhance bowel preparation and potentially reduce the need for repeat procedures.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This usability study aimed to identify strengths and weaknesses in a prototype companion app for colonoscopy exams. The objective was to obtain in-depth insights into the app's usability, ease of use, and content comprehension, with the objective of refining the tool to effectively fulfil its intended purpose, guided by feedback from potential users.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From February to August 2024, we conducted a qualitative study using the think-aloud (TA) procedure. Each session involved 6 tasks and a semi-structured interview to delve deeper into participants' task experiences. All TA sessions and interviews were recorded. Quantitative usability questions were analysed using Microsoft Excel, while qualitative data underwent coding and analysis based on thematic analysis principles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 17 individuals, all smartphone users, participated in this study. Participants were recruited from one hospital, one private clinic, and one patient organisation in Switzerland. The study found that participants rated the app's usability metrics positively, with an overall mean rating of ease of use at 4.29 (SD 0.59), usefulness at 4.53 (SD 0.72), and comprehensibility at 4.29 (SD 0.92). For the individual features, the mean ratings for ease of use were between 4.00 and 4.65, usefulness ranged from 4.35 to 4.82, and comprehensibility received ratings between 4.29 and 4.53, all measured on a 5-point scale, where 1 represented low agreement and 5 indicated high agreement. Additionally, 100% of participants indicated they will or may use the app if they require a colonoscopy exam. Participants highlighted the need for reminders and alerts in the week leading up to the colonoscopy, along with tailored content, simplified language, and visual aids.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The app prototype demonstrated favourable results with the majority of participants, and the testing process enabled the prompt identification and resolution of usability issues. The next phase will prioritize and assess potential improvements based on urgency and feasibility to guide a focused development plan. Usability testing highlighted features like push notifications and personalised content as top priorities for participants, making them key areas for immediate attention. Moving forward, the app has the potential to function effectively as a companion app for colonoscopy exams. To achieve this, further studies with a large","PeriodicalId":36351,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Human Factors","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142956278","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Pain and its adequate treatment are an issue in hospitals and emergency departments (EDs). A virtual reality (VR) tool to manage pain could act as a valuable complement to common pharmaceutical analgesics. While efficacy could be shown in previous studies, this does not assure clinical adoption in EDs.
Objective: The main aim of this study was to investigate which factors affect the adoption and potential reimbursement of a VR tool for pain management in the ED of a Swiss university hospital.
Methods: Key informant interviews were conducted using in-depth semistructured interviews with 11 participants reflecting the perspectives of all the relevant stakeholder groups, including physicians, nurses, patients, health technology providers, and health insurance and reimbursement experts. The interviews were recorded and transcribed, and the extracted data were systematically analyzed using a thematic analysis and narrative synthesis of emergent themes. A consolidated framework for eHealth adoption was used to enable a systematic investigation of the topic and help determine which adoption factors are considered as facilitators or barriers or as not particularly relevant for the tool subject of this study.
Results: According to the participants, the three key facilitators are (1) organizational environment; (2) tension for change, ease of use, and demonstrability; and (3) employee engagement. Further, the three key barriers to adoption are (1) workload, (2) changes in clinical workflow and habit, and (3) reimbursement.
Conclusions: This study concludes that the adoption of a VR tool for pain management in the ED of the hospital subject of this study, although benefiting from a high tension for change in pain and workload management, is highly dependent on the respective organizational environment, engagement of the clinical staff, and reimbursement considerations. While tailored incentive structures and ambassador roles could benefit initial adoption, a change in the reimbursement landscape and further investigation of the positive effects on workflow effectiveness are required to drive long-term adoption.
{"title":"Factors Impacting the Adoption and Potential Reimbursement of a Virtual Reality Tool for Pain Management in Switzerland: Qualitative Case Study.","authors":"Josefine Lurtz, Thomas C Sauter, Christine Jacob","doi":"10.2196/59073","DOIUrl":"10.2196/59073","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain and its adequate treatment are an issue in hospitals and emergency departments (EDs). A virtual reality (VR) tool to manage pain could act as a valuable complement to common pharmaceutical analgesics. While efficacy could be shown in previous studies, this does not assure clinical adoption in EDs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The main aim of this study was to investigate which factors affect the adoption and potential reimbursement of a VR tool for pain management in the ED of a Swiss university hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Key informant interviews were conducted using in-depth semistructured interviews with 11 participants reflecting the perspectives of all the relevant stakeholder groups, including physicians, nurses, patients, health technology providers, and health insurance and reimbursement experts. The interviews were recorded and transcribed, and the extracted data were systematically analyzed using a thematic analysis and narrative synthesis of emergent themes. A consolidated framework for eHealth adoption was used to enable a systematic investigation of the topic and help determine which adoption factors are considered as facilitators or barriers or as not particularly relevant for the tool subject of this study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to the participants, the three key facilitators are (1) organizational environment; (2) tension for change, ease of use, and demonstrability; and (3) employee engagement. Further, the three key barriers to adoption are (1) workload, (2) changes in clinical workflow and habit, and (3) reimbursement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study concludes that the adoption of a VR tool for pain management in the ED of the hospital subject of this study, although benefiting from a high tension for change in pain and workload management, is highly dependent on the respective organizational environment, engagement of the clinical staff, and reimbursement considerations. While tailored incentive structures and ambassador roles could benefit initial adoption, a change in the reimbursement landscape and further investigation of the positive effects on workflow effectiveness are required to drive long-term adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":36351,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Human Factors","volume":"11 ","pages":"e59073"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11634046/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142781434","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jon Sussex, Helen Atherton, Gary Abel, Christopher Clark, Emma Cockcroft, Brandi Leach, Christine Marriott, Jennifer Newbould, Emma Pitchforth, Rachel Winder, John Campbell
<p><strong>Background: </strong>General medical practitioners and other staff at primary care medical practices have an important role in facilitating patient access to online services in the National Health Service in England. These services range from online ordering of repeat prescriptions to conducting online consultations with health care professionals. We have defined "digital facilitation" as that range of processes, procedures, and personnel that seeks to support patients in their uptake and use of online services.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We report how we have synthesized the evidence from a mixed methods study of digital facilitation in primary care in England. The study's objectives were to identify, characterize, and explore the benefits and challenges of different models of digital facilitation in general medical practices in England and to design a framework for evaluation of the effectiveness and costs of digital facilitation interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study comprised scoping review of literature, survey of staff in general practices, survey of patients, and ethnography at case study practices plus stakeholder interviews. We compiled a triangulation matrix of the findings from individual work packages through an iterative process whereby each work package's results were first analyzed separately and were then cumulatively combined across work packages in 3 successive workshops. From the resulting matrix, we developed a program theory and an implementation theory and constructed a framework for evaluations of digital facilitation in primary care. The final step of the synthesis process was to discuss the results with national and regional National Health Service stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Triangulation yielded a combined set of findings summarized within 11 thematic groupings: 3 setting the scene within which digital facilitation takes place, and 8 related to different types of digital facilitation, their implementation, and effectiveness. Some thematic groupings were evident in the findings of all 4 of the research work packages; others were not addressed in all the work packages but were evident from those where they were addressed. Throughout the synthesis, there were no instances where findings from one work package contradicted the findings of another. Findings either reinforced each other or offered complementary or additional insights. The discussion at the stakeholder meeting held at the end of the study resulted in the research team clarifying some findings but not changing any of them.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Digital facilitation can take many forms, though much of what is currently done in primary care practices in England is reactive and passive. Clear lines of responsibility, digital tools and platforms that work well for patients and practice staff, and investment in staff time and training are all needed if digital facilitation is to deliver on its promis
{"title":"Supporting Patients' Use of Digital Services in Primary Health Care in England: Synthesis of Evidence From a Mixed Methods Study of \"Digital Facilitation\".","authors":"Jon Sussex, Helen Atherton, Gary Abel, Christopher Clark, Emma Cockcroft, Brandi Leach, Christine Marriott, Jennifer Newbould, Emma Pitchforth, Rachel Winder, John Campbell","doi":"10.2196/52516","DOIUrl":"10.2196/52516","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>General medical practitioners and other staff at primary care medical practices have an important role in facilitating patient access to online services in the National Health Service in England. These services range from online ordering of repeat prescriptions to conducting online consultations with health care professionals. We have defined \"digital facilitation\" as that range of processes, procedures, and personnel that seeks to support patients in their uptake and use of online services.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We report how we have synthesized the evidence from a mixed methods study of digital facilitation in primary care in England. The study's objectives were to identify, characterize, and explore the benefits and challenges of different models of digital facilitation in general medical practices in England and to design a framework for evaluation of the effectiveness and costs of digital facilitation interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study comprised scoping review of literature, survey of staff in general practices, survey of patients, and ethnography at case study practices plus stakeholder interviews. We compiled a triangulation matrix of the findings from individual work packages through an iterative process whereby each work package's results were first analyzed separately and were then cumulatively combined across work packages in 3 successive workshops. From the resulting matrix, we developed a program theory and an implementation theory and constructed a framework for evaluations of digital facilitation in primary care. The final step of the synthesis process was to discuss the results with national and regional National Health Service stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Triangulation yielded a combined set of findings summarized within 11 thematic groupings: 3 setting the scene within which digital facilitation takes place, and 8 related to different types of digital facilitation, their implementation, and effectiveness. Some thematic groupings were evident in the findings of all 4 of the research work packages; others were not addressed in all the work packages but were evident from those where they were addressed. Throughout the synthesis, there were no instances where findings from one work package contradicted the findings of another. Findings either reinforced each other or offered complementary or additional insights. The discussion at the stakeholder meeting held at the end of the study resulted in the research team clarifying some findings but not changing any of them.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Digital facilitation can take many forms, though much of what is currently done in primary care practices in England is reactive and passive. Clear lines of responsibility, digital tools and platforms that work well for patients and practice staff, and investment in staff time and training are all needed if digital facilitation is to deliver on its promis","PeriodicalId":36351,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Human Factors","volume":"11 ","pages":"e52516"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11633515/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142773190","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}