Madrasahs located in Eastern and Southeastern Anatolia regions of Turkey have operated as centers of traditional religious thought for centuries. Although these institutions do not have an official status nowadays, they have maintained their influence in the region and have appealed to a wide social sector. The basic religious authority in these institutions are seydas who are respected and guide society in some fields. The religious understanding of Seydas and their approaches to certain issues related to religion allow us to determine the general attitude of the people in the context of related issues. Therefore, in this study, seydas are selected as a sample group. The main theme of the study is the relationship between gender and religion. This theme, which is one of the most debated issues in contemporary Islamic thought, is also one of the main interests of the sociology of religion. The points reflected in this study are the findings of a study focusing on the relationship between gender and religion through the seydas of Diyarbakir from the point of view of the sociology of religion. In the research, a qualitative research method was followed in the process of data collection and a descriptive technique was adopted in order to reveal the results and present them.
{"title":"Şark Medreselerinde Toplumsal Cinsiyet Anlayışı: Diyarbakır Seydaları Üzerinden Betimsel Bir Analiz","authors":"Abdusamet Kaya","doi":"10.33227/AUIFD.452063","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33227/AUIFD.452063","url":null,"abstract":"Madrasahs located in Eastern and Southeastern Anatolia regions of Turkey have operated as centers of traditional religious thought for centuries. Although these institutions do not have an official status nowadays, they have maintained their influence in the region and have appealed to a wide social sector. The basic religious authority in these institutions are seydas who are respected and guide society in some fields. The religious understanding of Seydas and their approaches to certain issues related to religion allow us to determine the general attitude of the people in the context of related issues. Therefore, in this study, seydas are selected as a sample group. The main theme of the study is the relationship between gender and religion. This theme, which is one of the most debated issues in contemporary Islamic thought, is also one of the main interests of the sociology of religion. The points reflected in this study are the findings of a study focusing on the relationship between gender and religion through the seydas of Diyarbakir from the point of view of the sociology of religion. In the research, a qualitative research method was followed in the process of data collection and a descriptive technique was adopted in order to reveal the results and present them.","PeriodicalId":36545,"journal":{"name":"Ankara Universitesi Ilahiyat Fakultesi Dergisi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48877466","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Bu makale, manzum bir kelam metninin Memluk Turk Devleti’nin son yuzyilinin basinda Halep’te yazilan serhini konu edinmektedir. Şerhe konu olan manzum metin, Ḥanefī-Māturīdī kelam geleneginin yayimlanmis en uzun Arapca akaid manzumesi olan Imāmzāde el-Buḫārī’nin (o.573/1177) ʿUḳūdu’l-ʿAḳāʾid fī Funūni’l-Fevāʾid isimli 770 beyitlik eseridir. Adi gecen manzumenin, 823 (1420) yilinda Halepli bir Ḥanefī alim olan Aḥmed b. Maḥmūd b. Suleymān (9./15.yy.) tarafindan Şerḥu’l-Cevāhiri’l-Muḍīʾe basligiyla yapilan serhi; gerek ʿImāduddīn en-Nesīmī’nin (o.823/1420) katledilmesi hakkinda oldukca net bilgiler vermesi ve gerekse Ḥurūfīligin Nesīmiyye kolundan bahseden ilk metin olmasi acisindan ayri bir oneme sahiptir. Soz konusu serhin tahkiki, bir yuksek lisans tezi kapsaminda bilimsel metotlara riayet edilmeden yapilmis; sonucta hem manzume hem de serhi baska kisilere nisbet edilmistir. Bu yazida, ilkin ana metin ile serhinin yazarlarinin kimligini tespit etme surecinde yasadiklarimiz hikayelendirilmeye calisilmis, ardindan serhin muhtevasi kelami ve siyasi acidan tahlil edilmis, son olarak da Nesīmiyye hareketinin Memluk cografyasindaki varlik zemini ve bunun serhteki izdusumu ele alinmistir.
这篇文章引用了土耳其原籍国用哈勒普语写的一篇文章的最新一集。在Ahanefi Maataride中，粉末中的粉末文本来源于罗马帝国的平原，该平原位于布琼姆扎德-布琼姆扎德的Arap学院7723之外；它包括770条粉末编织物。Adi gecen manzumenin，823（1420）yilinda Halepli birḤanefīalim olan Aḥmed b.Ma 7717；gerekʿImāduddin en Nesīmī（公元823/1420年）具有独特的效果，因为它是Huurúfīligin的Nesāmiyye arm中提到的第一个文本。冰的理论是，在高度理论中，科学方法论是不受规范的；结果，食物和血清都被测量给其他人。在这封信中，这封信的第一封信和第一封信都是写给宁静的作者的，宁静和政治紧迫的重要字眼后来被分析出来，并最终利用了《尼斯西米运动国家宪章》中的财富之地。
{"title":"Bir Şerhin Hikayesini Kovalarken Bir Hikayenin Şerhini Bulmak: Aḥmed b. Maḥmūd el-Ḥalebī’nin Şerḥu’l-Cevāhiri’l-Muḍīʾe’si ve Nesīmī’nin Öldürülüşüne Tanıklığı","authors":"M. Doğan","doi":"10.33227/AUIFD.538951","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33227/AUIFD.538951","url":null,"abstract":"Bu makale, manzum bir kelam metninin Memluk Turk Devleti’nin son yuzyilinin basinda Halep’te yazilan serhini konu edinmektedir. Şerhe konu olan manzum metin, Ḥanefī-Māturīdī kelam geleneginin yayimlanmis en uzun Arapca akaid manzumesi olan Imāmzāde el-Buḫārī’nin (o.573/1177) ʿUḳūdu’l-ʿAḳāʾid fī Funūni’l-Fevāʾid isimli 770 beyitlik eseridir. Adi gecen manzumenin, 823 (1420) yilinda Halepli bir Ḥanefī alim olan Aḥmed b. Maḥmūd b. Suleymān (9./15.yy.) tarafindan Şerḥu’l-Cevāhiri’l-Muḍīʾe basligiyla yapilan serhi; gerek ʿImāduddīn en-Nesīmī’nin (o.823/1420) katledilmesi hakkinda oldukca net bilgiler vermesi ve gerekse Ḥurūfīligin Nesīmiyye kolundan bahseden ilk metin olmasi acisindan ayri bir oneme sahiptir. Soz konusu serhin tahkiki, bir yuksek lisans tezi kapsaminda bilimsel metotlara riayet edilmeden yapilmis; sonucta hem manzume hem de serhi baska kisilere nisbet edilmistir. Bu yazida, ilkin ana metin ile serhinin yazarlarinin kimligini tespit etme surecinde yasadiklarimiz hikayelendirilmeye calisilmis, ardindan serhin muhtevasi kelami ve siyasi acidan tahlil edilmis, son olarak da Nesīmiyye hareketinin Memluk cografyasindaki varlik zemini ve bunun serhteki izdusumu ele alinmistir.","PeriodicalId":36545,"journal":{"name":"Ankara Universitesi Ilahiyat Fakultesi Dergisi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49624309","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tumel onermenin modalitesinin zorunlu , dāʾimī ve diger modalitelerden hangisiyle nitelenebilecegi hususu, Islam mantik literaturunde onemli bir tartisma konusudur. Tartisma, Ibn Sīnā’nin ortaya koydugu modal mantik sistemindeki tumel onermenin modalitesine dair karsi-iddia ile baslamistir. Ibn Sīnā’nin ortaya koydugu karsi-iddia , ilk kez Faḫruddīn er-Rāzī ile delil formunu kazanmistir. Naṣīruddīn eṭ-Ṭūsī, iddiayi er-Rāzī’den farkli sekilde delillendirmis, el-Ḫūnecī ise karsi-iddia yi zikredip delilini ve itirazini belirtmemistir. Ibn Sīnā karsi-iddia ya karsi-ornek ile er-Rāzī de bolme ile itiraz etmis, eṭ-Ṭūsī ise itirazinda ortaya koydugu karsi-delil in orta teriminin kaplamini genisletmistir. Ibn Sīnā ve er-Rāzī’nin itirazlari, tumel onermenin modalitesi icin zorunlu modalitesi disindaki diger modaliteleri mumkun gorurken, eṭ-Ṭūsī’nin itirazi karsi iddiayi kabul eder gorunmektedir. Tumel onermenin modalitesine dair karsi-iddia lar, bunlarin delilleri ve bunlara yonelik itirazlar, 18. yuzyil Osmanli bilim havzasinda Muḥammed el-Āmidī tarafindan Refʿu’l-Ḥicāb ʿan Cemīʿi’l-Muveccehāt isimli risalede yeniden gundeme getirilmistir. Klasik donemde tartisilmis bir konuyu post-klasik doneme tasimasi ve bir tercihte bulunmasi nedeniyle oldukca kayda deger bir risaledir. Makalede, once soz konusu tartismanin Islam mantik literaturundeki serencami ozetlenmis, ardindan el-Āmidī’nin ilgili risalesi tahlil edilmis ve farkli bir delil ortaya konulmus, son olarak da risalenin tenkitli Arapca metni sunulmustur.
此外，伊斯兰教是用语法、破坏性和其他形式描述肿胀的最重要的方式之一。伊本·辛揭示了现代男性体系中的女性生殖方式，即“生殖”。伊本·西纳（Ibn Sina）的奥塔亚·科伊杜古·卡西·伊迪亚（ortaya koydugu karsi iddia。Naṣīruddin eṭ-Tussey，iddia er-Raziiden farkli sekilde delillendirmis，el-Chong7722；同时，iddia的carsi产生delilini和itirazini。Ibn Sīnākarsi iddia ya karsi ornek ile er-Rāzīde bolme ile itiraz etmis，eṭ-Ṭ́Sīise itirazinda ortaya koydugu karsi delil in orta terinin kalamini genisletmistir。在伊本的案例中，去年的肿瘤切除方法是首先拆除了其他方式，而eṭ-Tussi的itirazis是公众可以接受的。他们沉迷于正常的加载模式，这些事情的证据，而这些事情的唯一原因是18岁。从沙特阿拉伯到沙特阿拉伯由于后古典冻结方案和偏好，经典地下室中的分类主题是一个破纪录的信息。在这篇文章中，分析了伊斯兰教逻辑文学中温和的宁静，并为阿米迪的信息提供了各种证据，最终就是该信息的阿拉伯语文本。
{"title":"Tümel Önermenin ‘Cihet’i: Muḥammed el-Āmidī’nin Refʿu’l-Ḥicāb ʿan Cemīʿi’l-Muveccehāt İsimli Eseri Bağlamında Bir İnceleme","authors":"Necmettin Pehlivan, M. Çelik","doi":"10.33227/AUIFD.535296","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33227/AUIFD.535296","url":null,"abstract":"Tumel onermenin modalitesinin zorunlu , dāʾimī ve diger modalitelerden hangisiyle nitelenebilecegi hususu, Islam mantik literaturunde onemli bir tartisma konusudur. Tartisma, Ibn Sīnā’nin ortaya koydugu modal mantik sistemindeki tumel onermenin modalitesine dair karsi-iddia ile baslamistir. Ibn Sīnā’nin ortaya koydugu karsi-iddia , ilk kez Faḫruddīn er-Rāzī ile delil formunu kazanmistir. Naṣīruddīn eṭ-Ṭūsī, iddiayi er-Rāzī’den farkli sekilde delillendirmis, el-Ḫūnecī ise karsi-iddia yi zikredip delilini ve itirazini belirtmemistir. Ibn Sīnā karsi-iddia ya karsi-ornek ile er-Rāzī de bolme ile itiraz etmis, eṭ-Ṭūsī ise itirazinda ortaya koydugu karsi-delil in orta teriminin kaplamini genisletmistir. Ibn Sīnā ve er-Rāzī’nin itirazlari, tumel onermenin modalitesi icin zorunlu modalitesi disindaki diger modaliteleri mumkun gorurken, eṭ-Ṭūsī’nin itirazi karsi iddiayi kabul eder gorunmektedir. Tumel onermenin modalitesine dair karsi-iddia lar, bunlarin delilleri ve bunlara yonelik itirazlar, 18. yuzyil Osmanli bilim havzasinda Muḥammed el-Āmidī tarafindan Refʿu’l-Ḥicāb ʿan Cemīʿi’l-Muveccehāt isimli risalede yeniden gundeme getirilmistir. Klasik donemde tartisilmis bir konuyu post-klasik doneme tasimasi ve bir tercihte bulunmasi nedeniyle oldukca kayda deger bir risaledir. Makalede, once soz konusu tartismanin Islam mantik literaturundeki serencami ozetlenmis, ardindan el-Āmidī’nin ilgili risalesi tahlil edilmis ve farkli bir delil ortaya konulmus, son olarak da risalenin tenkitli Arapca metni sunulmustur.","PeriodicalId":36545,"journal":{"name":"Ankara Universitesi Ilahiyat Fakultesi Dergisi","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47430237","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：