BMJ Leader最新文献

Objective: Achieving gender equity in academic medicine is not only a matter of social justice but also necessary in promoting an innovative and productive academic community. The purpose of this study was to assess gender distribution in dual MD/PhD academic programme faculty members across North America.

Methods: Academic metrics were analysed to quantify the relative career success of academic faculty members in MD/PhD programmes. Measured parameters included academic and leadership ranks along with nominal research factors such as peer-reviewed research publications, H-index, citation number and years of active research.

Results: Χ² analysis revealed a statistically significant (p<0.0001, χ²=114.5) difference in the gender distribution of faculty and leadership across North American MD/PhD programmes. Men held 74.2% of full professor positions, 64% of associate professor positions, 59.4% of assistant professor positions and 62.8% of lecturer positions. Moreover, men occupied a larger share of faculty leadership roles with a statistically significant disparity across all ranks (p<0.001, χ²=20.4). A higher proportion of men held positions as department chairs (79.6%), vice chairs (69.1%) and programme leads (69.4%).

Conclusion: Gender disparity was prevalent in the MD/PhD programmes throughout North America with women achieving a lower degree of professional stature than men. Ultimately, steps must be taken to support women faculty to afford them better opportunities for academic and professional advancement.

Background: Changes in emergency departments are frequently implemented to improve efficiency and reduce costs. However, staff acceptance and adoption are crucial for the intended success of changes.

Objectives: This study explored staff perceptions of factors influencing the implementation of changes and any common themes linking changes and factors influencing changes in an emergency department at a university teaching hospital in the UK.

Methods: We used constructivist grounded theory methodology to perform a secondary analysis of 41 interview transcripts of physicians, nurses, support workers and managers involved in paediatric emergency care.

Results: Participants identified leadership, communication and education as factors impacting change management. They described many emotions associated with changes and with communication, leadership and education or the lack of any of them during changes. Both positive and negative emotions sometimes coexisted at individual, team or organisational levels. Negative emotions were due to real-life challenges and concern over compromised patient care. Professional values dictated the actions or inactions that transpired either because of these emotions or despite these emotions in health professionals.

Conclusions: Emotions to change should be acknowledged and addressed by credible leadership clear communication and education to improve the change process, its success and ultimately, patient care.

Objectives: This study explores the evolving position of the health system chief information officer (CIO) by identifying new core roles for success.

Methods: An advisory board of industry executives and system leaders guided the study. Purposeful sampling was used to invite chief executive officer and CIOs from 65 not-for-profit US health systems to participate. Interviews were conducted with 51 executives from 33 different systems, using a comprehensive interview topic guide. Interview transcripts were analysed using NVivo software, focusing on themes related to the evolving role of the health system CIO.

Results: Analyses revealed three main themes, with the CIO as (1) enabler of strategic change and transformation, (2) strategic developer of technology and leadership talent and (3) driver of organisational culture.

Discussion: The role of CIO has undergone transformation from technology and information system management to strategic leadership within the broader health system context. It highlights the importance of comprehensive business knowledge for CIOs and the need for other C-suite executives to have a deeper understanding of information and technology.

Conclusion: As healthcare continues to evolve, the role of the CIO is expected to expand further, requiring a blend of technical and strategic business skills. This evolution presents opportunities for health systems to enhance their leadership development programmes, preparing leaders for the complexities of the contemporary health system sector.

Introduction: The increasing frequency of pandemics, demand for healthcare and costs of healthcare services require efficient health systems with integrated care via a command centre that ensures a centralised and coordinated approach to exercise effective leadership.

Description: We present a case study using the conceptual framework of Franklin to describe the novel system-based engineering approach of the Saudi National Health Command Centre (NHCC) including its features and outcomes measured.

Discussion: The NHCC is structured into four departments and four zones with real-time data integration and visualisation on 88 dashboards. To empower leadership, it harnesses artificial intelligence affordances such as machine learning algorithms to enhance functionality, decision-making processes and overall performance. This allows for the rapid assessment of available resources and to monitor healthcare system efficiency at diverse levels of clinical and system indicators. Enhanced proactive capacity management has contributed to reducing lengths of stay, average supply chain lead time and surgery waiting list; early bending of the COVID-19 curve resulting in a low mortality rate; increasing bed capacity; deploying medical staff and mechanical ventilators rapidly; rolling out the COVID-19 vaccination programme and improving patient satisfaction.

Conclusion: Integrating a healthcare system with a command centre provides healthcare leaders with the necessary infrastructure to create synergy between people, processes and technologies. This substantially improves both patient and service outcomes. It also allows for immediate care coordination and resource allocations and safeguards ease of access to care.

Background: In 2017, a group of trainee general practitioners (GPs) came together to design and deliver a six-session leadership development programme for their peer trainee and early career GPs: the Next Generation GP programme. Over 2500 GPs took part in Next Generation GP between 2017 and 2022.

Aim: To evaluate the origins and development of the Next Generation GP programme, its early impact on individuals and general practice, and what it reveals about GPs' needs for career and leadership development at a time of major workforce and demand pressures.

Methods: A rapid review of evidence on general practice workforce and career trends informed the design of qualitative research interviews (n=28) with a purposive sample of programme participants, primary care leaders and educational experts. This was supplemented by analysis of secondary data from participant evaluations of programme workshops.

Results: Many programme participants reported: improved competence in leadership skills, increased understanding of the health system, having new support networks and more energy for their GP role. Respondents pointed out the strengths of the programme, also highlighting ways in which it could be adapted to enable a transition to a more sustainable position within broader clinical and leadership career development.

Conclusions: Next Generation GP has to date largely fulfilled its programme objectives. It now needs more tangible, longer-term objectives against which to assess outcomes. This evaluation has contributed to evidence about primary care leadership needing more policy attention, for the balance of autonomy and accountability within GP leadership needs careful and sustained support.

Background: Dr Andrea Doria is Professor and Vice-Chair of Radiology (Clinical Practice Improvement) at the University of Toronto, Research Director, Senior Scientist and Imaging Lead of Personalised Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), Toronto, Canada. Over the past few decades, Dr Doria has established a track record of healthcare leadership. Based on Dr Doria's extensive leadership experience, she believes it is essential for established healthcare leaders to be involved in cultivating emerging healthcare leaders.

Methods: An interview was conducted with Dr Doria to learn about key lessons she believes are essential for healthcare leaders to help develop the next generation. Dr Doria reflected on her leadership style and experiences, sharing what has worked to improve the effectiveness of her teams.

Results: Key messages were reflected upon, including practical ways for senior leaders to support the next generation; leadership insights gained from the pandemic; the importance of building diversity in teams and nurturing leaders from underrepresented minorities; challenges to be aware of for the future of healthcare leadership; finding inspiration from team members and essential traits for healthcare leaders.

Conclusion: Through cultivating the next generation of healthcare leaders, established leaders can be involved in establishing a brighter future for healthcare. This article describes reflections and practical takeaways that can help established leaders support emerging leaders and build their leadership skills.