Pub Date : 2020-07-30DOI: 10.1163/24055069-00503004
G. Toomer
{"title":"The Republic of Arabic Letters: Islam and the European Enlightenment, written by Alexander Bevilacqua","authors":"G. Toomer","doi":"10.1163/24055069-00503004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/24055069-00503004","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37173,"journal":{"name":"Erudition and the Republic of Letters","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2020-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/24055069-00503004","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42456498","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-04-25DOI: 10.1163/24055069-00502001
M. Cattaneo
This article analyses the scholarly efforts of two generations of late humanists on a text that became particularly popular in learned circles around the turn of the seventeenth century: Tertullian’s mock oration on the philosophical cloak, known as De Pallio. It focusses on a methodological shift in scholarship from conjectural emendation to antiquarian explication, and it highlights the polemical and literary dynamics at the basis of the text’s reinterpretation as a satire. These insights are in turn linked to the changing circumstances of learned polemics in the Republic of Letters, and to the central place of confessional strife as an organizing principle for scholarship itself. I conclude the article by gesturing towards the seventeenth-century fortune of the ‘pallium’ as a polemical trope.
{"title":"Between Antiquarianism and Satire: Tertullian’s De Pallio in the Age of Confessions, c. 1590–1630","authors":"M. Cattaneo","doi":"10.1163/24055069-00502001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/24055069-00502001","url":null,"abstract":"This article analyses the scholarly efforts of two generations of late humanists on a text that became particularly popular in learned circles around the turn of the seventeenth century: Tertullian’s mock oration on the philosophical cloak, known as De Pallio. It focusses on a methodological shift in scholarship from conjectural emendation to antiquarian explication, and it highlights the polemical and literary dynamics at the basis of the text’s reinterpretation as a satire. These insights are in turn linked to the changing circumstances of learned polemics in the Republic of Letters, and to the central place of confessional strife as an organizing principle for scholarship itself. I conclude the article by gesturing towards the seventeenth-century fortune of the ‘pallium’ as a polemical trope.","PeriodicalId":37173,"journal":{"name":"Erudition and the Republic of Letters","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2020-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/24055069-00502001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45183719","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-10-26DOI: 10.1163/24055069-00404001
Yossi Almagor
This article demonstrates how patron-client relationships in mid-eighteenth century England were shaped against the background of the transition to a more negotiated marketplace. By focusing on the twenty-five-year relationship between Thomas Birch and Philip Yorke, we learn how an interesting variant of patronage embroiled with friendship developed between the two. In exchange for his services as intelligencer and agent, Birch enjoyed the benefits of Yorke’s influential network, obtaining new livings as clergyman and advancing his career as historian. Confrontations between the two, particularly on matters involving their work as dedicated historians, did not prevent them from remaining mutually loyal throughout their decades-long affiliation.
{"title":"Friendship in the Shadow of Patronage: The Correspondence between Thomas Birch and Philip Yorke (1740–1766) Revisited","authors":"Yossi Almagor","doi":"10.1163/24055069-00404001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/24055069-00404001","url":null,"abstract":"This article demonstrates how patron-client relationships in mid-eighteenth century England were shaped against the background of the transition to a more negotiated marketplace. By focusing on the twenty-five-year relationship between Thomas Birch and Philip Yorke, we learn how an interesting variant of patronage embroiled with friendship developed between the two. In exchange for his services as intelligencer and agent, Birch enjoyed the benefits of Yorke’s influential network, obtaining new livings as clergyman and advancing his career as historian. Confrontations between the two, particularly on matters involving their work as dedicated historians, did not prevent them from remaining mutually loyal throughout their decades-long affiliation.","PeriodicalId":37173,"journal":{"name":"Erudition and the Republic of Letters","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2019-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/24055069-00404001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44377820","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-10-26DOI: 10.1163/24055069-00404004
{"title":"Contents","authors":"","doi":"10.1163/24055069-00404004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/24055069-00404004","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37173,"journal":{"name":"Erudition and the Republic of Letters","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2019-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/24055069-00404004","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45313428","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-10-26DOI: 10.1163/24055069-00404002
S. Bauer
Onofrio Panvinio was hired by sixteenth-century Roman families to write their histories and, where necessary, be prepared to bend the facts to suit their interests. This occasionally entailed a bit of forgery, usually involving tampering with specific words in documents. In most respects, however, Panvinio employed the same techniques—archival research and material evidence such as tombs and inscriptions—which distinguished his papal and ecclesiastical histories. This suggests that genealogy, despite being commissioned by aristocratic families to glorify their ancestries, can be seen as a more serious field of historical investigation than is often assumed. Yet the contours of this genre of history for hire in sixteenth-century Italian historiography are nowhere near exact. Panvinio struck a balance between fulfilling the expectations of the noble families who commissioned him and following his own scholarly instincts as an historian, but he nevertheless did not seek their publication. By contrast, Alfonso Ceccarelli, who also composed family histories, veered considerably in the direction of flattering his patrons, even forging entire papal and imperial privileges. Indeed, he was condemned to death for the forgery of wills concerning the property rights of nobles.
{"title":"History for Hire in Sixteenth-Century Italy: Onofrio Panvinio’s Histories of Roman Families","authors":"S. Bauer","doi":"10.1163/24055069-00404002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/24055069-00404002","url":null,"abstract":"Onofrio Panvinio was hired by sixteenth-century Roman families to write their histories and, where necessary, be prepared to bend the facts to suit their interests. This occasionally entailed a bit of forgery, usually involving tampering with specific words in documents. In most respects, however, Panvinio employed the same techniques—archival research and material evidence such as tombs and inscriptions—which distinguished his papal and ecclesiastical histories. This suggests that genealogy, despite being commissioned by aristocratic families to glorify their ancestries, can be seen as a more serious field of historical investigation than is often assumed. Yet the contours of this genre of history for hire in sixteenth-century Italian historiography are nowhere near exact. Panvinio struck a balance between fulfilling the expectations of the noble families who commissioned him and following his own scholarly instincts as an historian, but he nevertheless did not seek their publication. By contrast, Alfonso Ceccarelli, who also composed family histories, veered considerably in the direction of flattering his patrons, even forging entire papal and imperial privileges. Indeed, he was condemned to death for the forgery of wills concerning the property rights of nobles.","PeriodicalId":37173,"journal":{"name":"Erudition and the Republic of Letters","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2019-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/24055069-00404002","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45370970","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-10-26DOI: 10.1163/24055069-00404003
Nicholas Mithen
Historians of scholarship and intellectual historians have recently been paying more attention to the social and epistemic conditioning of scholarly production. Informed by the history of science, such scholarship has shed light upon how knowledge production changed over time, and how its ‘legislation’, ‘administration’, and ‘institutionalisation’ varied in different contexts. This article explores the reform of intellectual culture in the early eighteenth-century Italian republic of letters, as a case-study in the application of such emergent methodologies. From around 1700, a nexus of ethical, aesthetical and epistemological ideals began to crystallize on the Italian peninsula, codified under the concept of ‘buon gusto’ or ‘good taste’. ‘Buon gusto’ became a point of reference for individual scholars, scholarly communities and literary journals seeking to reform scholarly practice. This led to the normalization of historical criticism as the dominant scholarly mode among Italian scholars by the mid-eighteenth century.
{"title":"A Taste for Criticism: ‘Buon Gusto’ and the Reform of Historical Scholarship in the Early Eighteenth-Century Italian Republic of Letters","authors":"Nicholas Mithen","doi":"10.1163/24055069-00404003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/24055069-00404003","url":null,"abstract":"Historians of scholarship and intellectual historians have recently been paying more attention to the social and epistemic conditioning of scholarly production. Informed by the history of science, such scholarship has shed light upon how knowledge production changed over time, and how its ‘legislation’, ‘administration’, and ‘institutionalisation’ varied in different contexts. This article explores the reform of intellectual culture in the early eighteenth-century Italian republic of letters, as a case-study in the application of such emergent methodologies. From around 1700, a nexus of ethical, aesthetical and epistemological ideals began to crystallize on the Italian peninsula, codified under the concept of ‘buon gusto’ or ‘good taste’. ‘Buon gusto’ became a point of reference for individual scholars, scholarly communities and literary journals seeking to reform scholarly practice. This led to the normalization of historical criticism as the dominant scholarly mode among Italian scholars by the mid-eighteenth century.","PeriodicalId":37173,"journal":{"name":"Erudition and the Republic of Letters","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2019-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/24055069-00404003","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42522967","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-06-28DOI: 10.1163/24055069-00403001
I. Smet
Isaac Casaubon’s 1605 Persius edition and its companion-piece, the De satyrica Graecorum poesi et Romanorum satira, likewise published in 1605, have long been considered milestones in the history of scholarship on Ancient satire. Marshalling evidence from humanist correspondences, annotated copies of early printed books, manuscripts and visual materials, this study offers a fresh and much fuller and more nuanced view of either book’s trajectory from concept to print and distribution, of the motivations and guiding principles behind Casaubon’s research, and, more generally, of scholarly endeavor around the turn of the seventeenth century. I demonstrate how Casaubon’s work on satire is linked to the humanist recovery of Ancient scholia, how its erudition integrates observations on the contemporary world and non-textual evidence, and how it is marked by fierce scholarly rivalry and – hitherto underestimated – confessional differences.
Isaac Casaubon 1605年的波斯语版本及其配套作品《De satyrica Graecorum poesi et Romanorum satira》也于1605年出版，长期以来一直被认为是古代讽刺学术史上的里程碑。这项研究汇集了来自人文主义信件、早期印刷书籍的注释副本、手稿和视觉材料的证据，对这两本书从概念到印刷和发行的轨迹、Casaubon研究背后的动机和指导原则，以及更广泛地说，17世纪之交的学术努力。我展示了卡苏本的讽刺作品是如何与古代学术的人文主义复兴联系在一起的，它的博学如何融合了对当代世界的观察和非文本证据，以及它是如何以激烈的学术竞争和迄今被低估的忏悔差异为标志的。
{"title":"How the Sauce Got to be Better than the Fish: Scholarship and Rivalry in Isaac Casaubon’s Studies of Ancient Satire","authors":"I. Smet","doi":"10.1163/24055069-00403001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/24055069-00403001","url":null,"abstract":"Isaac Casaubon’s 1605 Persius edition and its companion-piece, the De satyrica Graecorum poesi et Romanorum satira, likewise published in 1605, have long been considered milestones in the history of scholarship on Ancient satire. Marshalling evidence from humanist correspondences, annotated copies of early printed books, manuscripts and visual materials, this study offers a fresh and much fuller and more nuanced view of either book’s trajectory from concept to print and distribution, of the motivations and guiding principles behind Casaubon’s research, and, more generally, of scholarly endeavor around the turn of the seventeenth century. I demonstrate how Casaubon’s work on satire is linked to the humanist recovery of Ancient scholia, how its erudition integrates observations on the contemporary world and non-textual evidence, and how it is marked by fierce scholarly rivalry and – hitherto underestimated – confessional differences.","PeriodicalId":37173,"journal":{"name":"Erudition and the Republic of Letters","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2019-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/24055069-00403001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46426923","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-06-28DOI: 10.1163/24055069-00403004
M. Vince
Isaac Casaubon’s open letter to Fronton du Duc (1611) was the most eagerly anticipated contribution to James I’s controversy with the Jesuits. It provoked a vitriolic response from Andreas Eudaemon-Joannes, who insinuated that Casaubon’s father had been hanged. As this paper demonstrates, it is due to Casaubon’s successful rhetoric that he is often believed to have been outraged only by Eudaemon-Joannes’ slanderous treatment of his father, but not by the Jesuit’s attacks on Casaubon’s scholarly competence and moral integrity. Even as he protested that these ridiculous accusations do not merit a reply, Casaubon did in fact publish three slanderous responses, and further undermined Eudaemon-Joannes and the Jesuits in his private correspondence. This paper contributes to the revision of Mark Pattison’s depiction of Casaubon’s ‘English’ years, and his turn to theology, as a failure. By tracing the genesis of a short passage in Casaubon’s Exercitationes, it reassesses treatises by Eudaemon-Joannes, Prideaux and Casaubon in the light of Casaubon’s recently published correspondence. A comparison of the rhetorical strategies of these authors demonstrates that they shared a culture of polemic that did not shy away from slanderous and vulgar imagery.
Isaac Casaubon给Fronton du Duc的公开信（1611年）是詹姆斯一世与耶稣会士争论中最受期待的贡献。这引起了安德烈亚斯·尤达蒙·乔安妮的尖刻回应，她暗示卡苏本的父亲已经被绞死。正如本文所表明的那样，正是由于卡苏本的成功言辞，人们通常认为他只对尤达·乔安妮对他父亲的诽谤感到愤怒，而不是对耶稣会攻击卡苏本学术能力和道德操守感到愤怒。尽管Casaubon抗议这些荒谬的指控不值得回应，但事实上，他确实发表了三篇诽谤性的回应，并在他的私人信件中进一步破坏了Eudaemon Joannes和耶稣会士。本文有助于修正马克·帕蒂森对卡苏本“英语”时代的描述，以及他转向神学的失败。通过追溯《卡苏邦的练习》中一段短文的起源，它根据卡苏邦最近发表的信件重新评估了尤达蒙·乔安妮、普里多和卡苏邦等人的论文。对这些作者的修辞策略进行比较表明，他们共享一种不回避诽谤和粗俗意象的论战文化。
{"title":"Isaac Casaubon, Andreas Eudaemon-Joannes, John Prideaux, and Tarnished Reputations: A (not Entirely) Scholarly Controversy","authors":"M. Vince","doi":"10.1163/24055069-00403004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/24055069-00403004","url":null,"abstract":"Isaac Casaubon’s open letter to Fronton du Duc (1611) was the most eagerly anticipated contribution to James I’s controversy with the Jesuits. It provoked a vitriolic response from Andreas Eudaemon-Joannes, who insinuated that Casaubon’s father had been hanged. As this paper demonstrates, it is due to Casaubon’s successful rhetoric that he is often believed to have been outraged only by Eudaemon-Joannes’ slanderous treatment of his father, but not by the Jesuit’s attacks on Casaubon’s scholarly competence and moral integrity. Even as he protested that these ridiculous accusations do not merit a reply, Casaubon did in fact publish three slanderous responses, and further undermined Eudaemon-Joannes and the Jesuits in his private correspondence. This paper contributes to the revision of Mark Pattison’s depiction of Casaubon’s ‘English’ years, and his turn to theology, as a failure. By tracing the genesis of a short passage in Casaubon’s Exercitationes, it reassesses treatises by Eudaemon-Joannes, Prideaux and Casaubon in the light of Casaubon’s recently published correspondence. A comparison of the rhetorical strategies of these authors demonstrates that they shared a culture of polemic that did not shy away from slanderous and vulgar imagery.","PeriodicalId":37173,"journal":{"name":"Erudition and the Republic of Letters","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2019-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/24055069-00403004","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49215652","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-06-28DOI: 10.1163/24055069-00403002
Matteo Campagnolo
The Hellenist Isaac Casaubon taught at Geneva’s Academy from 1582 to 1596. Invited to Montpellier’s University as the future restorer of Greek studies, after the tormented years of the French civil wars, he moved to the Midi of France. A few weeks later, Casaubon started to keep a diary. The psychological reasons of this decision and the nature of his journal are examined. Started as a sort of log-book, it is argued that its deep roots are to be sought in the difficulty to adapt himself to an environment so utterly contrasting with reformed Geneva, lacking sound and comfortable “religious safeguards”, and in the sudden solitude in which he fell, deprived as he was of the contact with his coreligionist colleagues and friends. Casaubon, Rousseau, Amiel, three authors deeply stamped by Reformation: it cannot be due to sheer coincidence if they all started very personal autobiographical writings, eventually worded as journal intime. The root of Capitalism and of Punctuality has been shown to be the Genevan Reformation, the author argues that the genre of the journal intime too developed under the new psychological relationship of persons to themselves which grew out of the unprecedented religious and moral context.
{"title":"Casaubon’s Ephemerides as a Companion of Calvinist Ascesis through Labour","authors":"Matteo Campagnolo","doi":"10.1163/24055069-00403002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/24055069-00403002","url":null,"abstract":"The Hellenist Isaac Casaubon taught at Geneva’s Academy from 1582 to 1596. Invited to Montpellier’s University as the future restorer of Greek studies, after the tormented years of the French civil wars, he moved to the Midi of France. A few weeks later, Casaubon started to keep a diary. The psychological reasons of this decision and the nature of his journal are examined. Started as a sort of log-book, it is argued that its deep roots are to be sought in the difficulty to adapt himself to an environment so utterly contrasting with reformed Geneva, lacking sound and comfortable “religious safeguards”, and in the sudden solitude in which he fell, deprived as he was of the contact with his coreligionist colleagues and friends. Casaubon, Rousseau, Amiel, three authors deeply stamped by Reformation: it cannot be due to sheer coincidence if they all started very personal autobiographical writings, eventually worded as journal intime. The root of Capitalism and of Punctuality has been shown to be the Genevan Reformation, the author argues that the genre of the journal intime too developed under the new psychological relationship of persons to themselves which grew out of the unprecedented religious and moral context.","PeriodicalId":37173,"journal":{"name":"Erudition and the Republic of Letters","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2019-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/24055069-00403002","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47810967","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-06-28DOI: 10.1163/24055069-00403003
G. Tournoy
This contribution focuses on the relationship between Isaac Casaubon and a few humanist scholars from the Low Countries, who were interested in the search for manuscripts and the edition of Greek authors, particularly the Fathers of the Church: Bonaventura Vulcanius, Andreas Schottus, Petrus Pantinus.
{"title":"Isaac Casaubon and Greek Scholarship in the Low Countries","authors":"G. Tournoy","doi":"10.1163/24055069-00403003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/24055069-00403003","url":null,"abstract":"This contribution focuses on the relationship between Isaac Casaubon and a few humanist scholars from the Low Countries, who were interested in the search for manuscripts and the edition of Greek authors, particularly the Fathers of the Church: Bonaventura Vulcanius, Andreas Schottus, Petrus Pantinus.","PeriodicalId":37173,"journal":{"name":"Erudition and the Republic of Letters","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2019-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/24055069-00403003","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46570638","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：