Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.31696/2618-7302-2021-1-259-271
A. Shustova
{"title":"REVIEW OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE “TIBETOLOGY AND BUDDHOLOGY AT THE INTERSECTION OF SCIENCE AND RELIGION”","authors":"A. Shustova","doi":"10.31696/2618-7302-2021-1-259-271","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31696/2618-7302-2021-1-259-271","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":373435,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Institute of Oriental Studies RAS","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115363054","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.31696/2618-7302-2022-1-204-219
Kyrill I. Demich, Alexander V. Kostyrkin
The inconsistent history of a large-scale lexicographical project of 1930–1940s (under N. I. Konrad, N. A. Nevsky, A. A. Kholodovich) is a remarkable milestone in development of the Far East ideographic languages’ lexicography in our country. The absence of published dictionaries as visible outcome of the lexicographical works poses the main difficulty for historians of science in reconstruction of the period and the treatment of the subject. Fund No. 152 of the Archive of Orientalists of the Institute of Oriental Manuscripts of the Russian Academy of Sciences contains a massif of documents, together with other materials illustrating the project in detail, but not offering coherent interpretation in the absence of extra sources, that is lexicographically informative ones, in order to close the gap of the reliable source material. Yet until recently, the historiography of the subject was lacking. The gap could be closed by a unique lexicographical monument discovered in the Institute of Oriental Studies. It should be a copy of the first galley proof portion of the “Great Japanese-Russian Character Dictionary”. The source analysis of the monument and its criticism in the full context of relevant documentary evidence known up to date along with more meaningful interpretation of the data allow for precise qualification of a little-studied decade-long dictionary project in the history of Oriental lexicography and prewar Japan studies in our country. It may be determined that for the first generations of Soviet scholars of Japan the unpublished dictionary appeared to be a kind of school forging a vital link between the pre-Revolution and post-war Soviet lexicography of Japanese language: from D. M. Pozdneyev to N. A. Syromyatnikov.
{"title":"ARCHIVED LEXICOGRAPHY: THE GALLEY PROOFS OF THE UNPUBLISHED “GREAT JAPANESE-RUSSIAN CHARACTER DICTIONARY” AS A HISTORICAL SOURCE","authors":"Kyrill I. Demich, Alexander V. Kostyrkin","doi":"10.31696/2618-7302-2022-1-204-219","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31696/2618-7302-2022-1-204-219","url":null,"abstract":"The inconsistent history of a large-scale lexicographical project of 1930–1940s (under N. I. Konrad, N. A. Nevsky, A. A. Kholodovich) is a remarkable milestone in development of the Far East ideographic languages’ lexicography in our country. The absence of published dictionaries as visible outcome of the lexicographical works poses the main difficulty for historians of science in reconstruction of the period and the treatment of the subject. Fund No. 152 of the Archive of Orientalists of the Institute of Oriental Manuscripts of the Russian Academy of Sciences contains a massif of documents, together with other materials illustrating the project in detail, but not offering coherent interpretation in the absence of extra sources, that is lexicographically informative ones, in order to close the gap of the reliable source material. Yet until recently, the historiography of the subject was lacking. The gap could be closed by a unique lexicographical monument discovered in the Institute of Oriental Studies. It should be a copy of the first galley proof portion of the “Great Japanese-Russian Character Dictionary”. The source analysis of the monument and its criticism in the full context of relevant documentary evidence known up to date along with more meaningful interpretation of the data allow for precise qualification of a little-studied decade-long dictionary project in the history of Oriental lexicography and prewar Japan studies in our country. It may be determined that for the first generations of Soviet scholars of Japan the unpublished dictionary appeared to be a kind of school forging a vital link between the pre-Revolution and post-war Soviet lexicography of Japanese language: from D. M. Pozdneyev to N. A. Syromyatnikov.","PeriodicalId":373435,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Institute of Oriental Studies RAS","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115407656","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.31696/2618-7302-2023-2-131-135
V. V. Prudnikov
The review is devoted to the «Second International Seljuk Historical and Geographical Symposium Iran (II. Uluslararası Selçuklu Tarihi Coğrafyası İran Sempozyumu)», which was held on October 13–15, 2022 in Konya (Republic of Turkey) on the basis of the Center for Research on Seljuk Culture and Civilization of the University of Nacmettin Erbakan (Selçuklu Kültür Ve Medeniyeti Uygulama Ve Araştırma Merkezi Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi) with the support of the Turkish Historical Society (Türk Tarih Kurumu) and the Seljuk Municipality of Konya (Selçuklu Belediyesi, Konya). This event is held regularly, traditionally receives wide coverage in the Turkish media and every time causes a great public outcry. The previous Symposium (Uluslararası Selçuklu Tarihi Coğrafyası Suriye-Filistin–Irak Sempozyumu) was held on October 25–27, 2019 and was devoted to the study of topical issues in the history of the Seljuks in the regions of Iraq, Syria and Palestine.
该评论是专门为«第二届国际塞尔柱历史和地理研讨会伊朗(II)。在土耳其历史学会(t rk Tarih Kurumu)和科尼亚塞尔柱市(seluklu Belediyesi，科尼亚)的支持下，于2022年10月13日至15日在科尼亚(土耳其共和国)以塞尔柱文化与文明研究中心(seluklu k lt r Ve Medeniyeti Uygulama Ve Araştırma Merkezi Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi)为基础举行。该活动定期举行，传统上受到土耳其媒体的广泛报道，每次都会引起公众的强烈抗议。上一届研讨会(uluslararasyi seluklu Tarihi Coğrafyası Suriye-Filistin-Irak Sempozyumu)于2019年10月25日至27日举行，致力于研究伊拉克、叙利亚和巴勒斯坦地区塞尔柱人历史上的热门问题。
{"title":"SECOND INTERNATIONAL SELJUK HISTORICAL AND GEOGRAPHICAL SYMPOSIUM: IRAN (II. ULUSLARARASI SELÇUKLU TARIHI COĞRAFYASI İRAN SEMPOZYUMU), October 13–15, 2022","authors":"V. V. Prudnikov","doi":"10.31696/2618-7302-2023-2-131-135","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31696/2618-7302-2023-2-131-135","url":null,"abstract":"The review is devoted to the «Second International Seljuk Historical and Geographical Symposium Iran (II. Uluslararası Selçuklu Tarihi Coğrafyası İran Sempozyumu)», which was held on October 13–15, 2022 in Konya (Republic of Turkey) on the basis of the Center for Research on Seljuk Culture and Civilization of the University of Nacmettin Erbakan (Selçuklu Kültür Ve Medeniyeti Uygulama Ve Araştırma Merkezi Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi) with the support of the Turkish Historical Society (Türk Tarih Kurumu) and the Seljuk Municipality of Konya (Selçuklu Belediyesi, Konya). This event is held regularly, traditionally receives wide coverage in the Turkish media and every time causes a great public outcry. The previous Symposium (Uluslararası Selçuklu Tarihi Coğrafyası Suriye-Filistin–Irak Sempozyumu) was held on October 25–27, 2019 and was devoted to the study of topical issues in the history of the Seljuks in the regions of Iraq, Syria and Palestine.","PeriodicalId":373435,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Institute of Oriental Studies RAS","volume":"153 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124272801","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.31696/2618-7302-2021-1-66-76
E. Y. Goncharov, Nyazim H. Bikkinyaev
{"title":"TIFLIS PULS OF BERDIBEK KHAN (758–760 A.H.)","authors":"E. Y. Goncharov, Nyazim H. Bikkinyaev","doi":"10.31696/2618-7302-2021-1-66-76","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31696/2618-7302-2021-1-66-76","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":373435,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Institute of Oriental Studies RAS","volume":"123 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121965918","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.31696/2618-7302-2023-1-036-047
Vladimir V. Grayvoronskiy
В статье рассмотрены краткая история подготовки и подписания Русско-Монгольского согла шения о дружбе 1912 г., причины, факторы, провозглашение независимости Монголии, «монгольский вопрос», позиция правительства царской России, миссия И. Я. Коростовца, переговоры, позиции рос сийской и монгольской сторон, основные пункты Соглашения, признание правительством Российской империи правительства Автономной Монголии. Ключевые слова: Российская империя, Монголия, «монгольский вопрос», миссия И. Я. Коростовца, Русско-Монгольское соглашение 1912 г., его место и значение Для цитирования: Грайворонский В. В. Место Русско-Монгольского соглашения 1912 г. в истории российско-монгольских отношений. Вестник Института востоковедения РАН. 2023. No 1. С. 36—47. DOI: 10.31696/2618-7302-2023-1-036-047
文章简要介绍了 1912 年俄蒙友好协定的筹备和签署历史、原因、因素、蒙古独立宣言、"蒙古问题"、沙皇俄国政府的立场、伊-伊-科罗斯托维茨的使命、谈判、俄蒙双方的立场、协定要点、俄罗斯帝国政府对蒙古自治政府的承认。关键词：俄罗斯帝国；蒙古；"蒙古问题"；伊-伊-科罗斯托维茨的使团；1912 年俄蒙协定；其地位和意义 For Citation: V. V. Graivoronsky.V. 1912 年俄蒙协定在俄蒙关系史上的地位.俄罗斯科学院东方学研究所公报》。2023.No 1.С.36-47.DOI: 10.31696/2618-7302-2023-1-036-047
{"title":"THE PLACE OF RUSSIAN-MONGOLIAN FRIENDSHIP AGREEMENT OF 1912 IN THE HISTORY OF RUSSIAN-MONGOLIAN RELATIONS","authors":"Vladimir V. Grayvoronskiy","doi":"10.31696/2618-7302-2023-1-036-047","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31696/2618-7302-2023-1-036-047","url":null,"abstract":"В статье рассмотрены краткая история подготовки и подписания Русско-Монгольского согла шения о дружбе 1912 г., причины, факторы, провозглашение независимости Монголии, «монгольский вопрос», позиция правительства царской России, миссия И. Я. Коростовца, переговоры, позиции рос сийской и монгольской сторон, основные пункты Соглашения, признание правительством Российской империи правительства Автономной Монголии. Ключевые слова: Российская империя, Монголия, «монгольский вопрос», миссия И. Я. Коростовца, Русско-Монгольское соглашение 1912 г., его место и значение Для цитирования: Грайворонский В. В. Место Русско-Монгольского соглашения 1912 г. в истории российско-монгольских отношений. Вестник Института востоковедения РАН. 2023. No 1. С. 36—47. DOI: 10.31696/2618-7302-2023-1-036-047","PeriodicalId":373435,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Institute of Oriental Studies RAS","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128236364","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.31696/2618-7302-2023-2-022-030
M. Kondratyeva
The article examines the influence of the personality of the Russian ambassador Nikolai Petrovich Rezanov on Russian-Japanese relations. The embassy of Nikolai Petrovich Rezanov to Japan ended in failure and gave rise to new sad events in Russian-Japanese relations. Among such events are the Khvostov incident (also known as the Rezanov-Davydov-Khvostov incident), when some Japanese villages and crafts on Sakhalin were robbed and burned, and the Golovnin incident, when the Russian navigator Vasily Mikhailovich Golovnin was captured by the Japanese and held in captivity for two years. The author made an attempt to find out the role of the personality of the envoy in all the listed events. An analysis of historiography has shown that researchers have repeatedly turned to the results of Rezanov’s embassy and to the analysis of his personality, coming to opposite conclusions about the envoy’s absolute guilt or complete innocence in the failure of the mission. The involvement of a wide range of sources, as well as the use of the induction method, allowed the author to come to new conclusions: the failure was not in one, but in a complex of reasons. Along with such reasons as poorly selected goods and the prejudiced attitude of the Japanese of that time towards the Russian people, the actions of Nikolai Petrovich influenced the failure of the mission. However, the main role was played by the isolation policy of the Japanese state, which, having begun in the middle of the 17th century, was firmly entrenched in Japanese society. As for the role of the envoy in relations with Japan, it is greatest in the sad story of the robbery of Japanese villages, which had a negative impact on relations with Japan.
{"title":"THE INFLUENCE OF THE ENVOY REZANOV’ S ACTIONS ON THE OUTCOME OF THE EMBASSY MISSION AND ON THE SUBSEQUENT EVENTS IN RUSSO-JAPANESE RELATIONS","authors":"M. Kondratyeva","doi":"10.31696/2618-7302-2023-2-022-030","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31696/2618-7302-2023-2-022-030","url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the influence of the personality of the Russian ambassador Nikolai Petrovich Rezanov on Russian-Japanese relations. The embassy of Nikolai Petrovich Rezanov to Japan ended in failure and gave rise to new sad events in Russian-Japanese relations. Among such events are the Khvostov incident (also known as the Rezanov-Davydov-Khvostov incident), when some Japanese villages and crafts on Sakhalin were robbed and burned, and the Golovnin incident, when the Russian navigator Vasily Mikhailovich Golovnin was captured by the Japanese and held in captivity for two years. The author made an attempt to find out the role of the personality of the envoy in all the listed events. An analysis of historiography has shown that researchers have repeatedly turned to the results of Rezanov’s embassy and to the analysis of his personality, coming to opposite conclusions about the envoy’s absolute guilt or complete innocence in the failure of the mission. The involvement of a wide range of sources, as well as the use of the induction method, allowed the author to come to new conclusions: the failure was not in one, but in a complex of reasons. Along with such reasons as poorly selected goods and the prejudiced attitude of the Japanese of that time towards the Russian people, the actions of Nikolai Petrovich influenced the failure of the mission. However, the main role was played by the isolation policy of the Japanese state, which, having begun in the middle of the 17th century, was firmly entrenched in Japanese society. As for the role of the envoy in relations with Japan, it is greatest in the sad story of the robbery of Japanese villages, which had a negative impact on relations with Japan.","PeriodicalId":373435,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Institute of Oriental Studies RAS","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127166793","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.31696/2618-7302-2023-2-037-053
D. Grafov
The article analyzes the consequences for China of the forceful reunification of Taiwan and to assess the acceptability of these consequences for Beijing authorities. The choice to conquer or not to conquer Taiwan is discussed from the perspective of the Bargaining Model of War that based on an assessment of the benefits costs ratio. The evaluation of the decision cost definitely depends on the perception of the rival’s actions and other external and internal variables. Each side evaluates more optimistic its own benefit-cost ratio and tries to shift the other side coast of war perception in order to change the decision to fight. The author comes to the conclusion that, on the one hand, the benefits-costs ratio is not favorable for Chinese authorities and they are not going to occupy Taiwan in current moment. But, on the other hand, China uses the threat to Taiwan as a lever in bargaining or deterring the United States. Also, the threat is used by Beijing for a pessimistic impact to the benefits-costs assessment in the event of Taiwan’s refusal to reunite and follow «Consensus 1992».
{"title":"TAIWAN CRISIS ANALYSIS FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF «BARGAINING OF WAR THEORY»","authors":"D. Grafov","doi":"10.31696/2618-7302-2023-2-037-053","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31696/2618-7302-2023-2-037-053","url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the consequences for China of the forceful reunification of Taiwan and to assess the acceptability of these consequences for Beijing authorities. The choice to conquer or not to conquer Taiwan is discussed from the perspective of the Bargaining Model of War that based on an assessment of the benefits costs ratio. The evaluation of the decision cost definitely depends on the perception of the rival’s actions and other external and internal variables. Each side evaluates more optimistic its own benefit-cost ratio and tries to shift the other side coast of war perception in order to change the decision to fight. The author comes to the conclusion that, on the one hand, the benefits-costs ratio is not favorable for Chinese authorities and they are not going to occupy Taiwan in current moment. But, on the other hand, China uses the threat to Taiwan as a lever in bargaining or deterring the United States. Also, the threat is used by Beijing for a pessimistic impact to the benefits-costs assessment in the event of Taiwan’s refusal to reunite and follow «Consensus 1992».","PeriodicalId":373435,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Institute of Oriental Studies RAS","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132998252","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.31696/2618-7302-2021-3-152-165
V. Tishin
{"title":"EASTERN AND WESTERN TÜRKS, SASSANIANS AND HEPHTHALITES IN THE LAST THIRD OF THE 6TH CENTURY: SOME PROBLEMS OF CHRONOLOGY AND POLITICAL HISTORY","authors":"V. Tishin","doi":"10.31696/2618-7302-2021-3-152-165","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31696/2618-7302-2021-3-152-165","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":373435,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Institute of Oriental Studies RAS","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130287325","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.31696/2618-7302-2021-2-70-85
Olga A. Vassilieva
This paper deals with the analysis of a basalt statue I, 1 а 5746 (IG 4225), coming from the Fayum city of Soknopaiou Nesos (Dimeh es-Seba) and depicting the standing male. The statue was acquired by Vladimir S. Golenischev and belongs to the collection of the Pushkin State Museum of Fine Arts in Moscow. The paper provides the first separate publication of this object. The statue belongs to the well-defined group of “striding draped male figures” dated to the period of 1 st century B.C. to the 1 st century A.D. Currently more than 130 monuments of such a type are known. During the research several specifications were developed for a more detailed comprehending of this monument. Special attention was paid to the contextualizing the statue and the analysis of its rare headdress, which attracted previously little attention. The standing male statues with lotus-bud diadems present a very unusual and interesting phenomenon. These monuments depicted the high dignitaries of Ptolemaic administration ( strategos , nomarchs , and high priests), all belonging to Egyptian origin (judging from prosopography). The lotus-bud diadem may have serve as the token of temple’s gratitude to the dignitaries for their benefits or may have been a special mark of distinction given by the Ptolemies. In broad sense this diadem could be compared with the so-called “crown of justification” elevating its owner to the divine status after death. This kind of statues could have been placed in the open spaces in temples or at the city’s agora.
本文对一尊玄武岩雕像I, 1, 5746 (IG 4225)进行了分析，该雕像来自Soknopaiou Nesos (Dimeh es-Seba)的Fayum市，描绘了站立的男性。这座雕像由Vladimir S. Golenischev收购，属于莫斯科普希金国家美术博物馆的收藏。这篇论文首次单独发表了这一对象。这尊雕像属于公元前1世纪至公元1世纪时期的“跨步披挂的男性雕像”，目前已知的此类雕像有130多座。在研究过程中，为了更详细地了解这座纪念碑，制定了几个规范。特别关注的是雕像的背景和对其罕见头饰的分析，这在以前很少引起关注。站着的荷花冠男像呈现出一种非常不寻常和有趣的现象。这些纪念碑描绘了托勒密政府的高级政要(战略官、游牧者和高级祭司)，都属于埃及血统(从族谱判断)。荷花花蕾的冠冕可能是寺庙对达官贵人的恩惠表示感谢的象征，也可能是托勒密王朝给予的特殊标志。从广义上讲，这个冠冕可以与所谓的“称义冠冕”相提并论，将其拥有者提升到死后的神圣地位。这种雕像可能被放置在寺庙或城市广场的空地上。
{"title":"THE MALE STATUE FROM THE FAYUM OASIS IN THE COLLECTION OF THE PUSHKIN STATE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS, MOSCOW: THE PROBLEM OF INTERPRETATION","authors":"Olga A. Vassilieva","doi":"10.31696/2618-7302-2021-2-70-85","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31696/2618-7302-2021-2-70-85","url":null,"abstract":"This paper deals with the analysis of a basalt statue I, 1 а 5746 (IG 4225), coming from the Fayum city of Soknopaiou Nesos (Dimeh es-Seba) and depicting the standing male. The statue was acquired by Vladimir S. Golenischev and belongs to the collection of the Pushkin State Museum of Fine Arts in Moscow. The paper provides the first separate publication of this object. The statue belongs to the well-defined group of “striding draped male figures” dated to the period of 1 st century B.C. to the 1 st century A.D. Currently more than 130 monuments of such a type are known. During the research several specifications were developed for a more detailed comprehending of this monument. Special attention was paid to the contextualizing the statue and the analysis of its rare headdress, which attracted previously little attention. The standing male statues with lotus-bud diadems present a very unusual and interesting phenomenon. These monuments depicted the high dignitaries of Ptolemaic administration ( strategos , nomarchs , and high priests), all belonging to Egyptian origin (judging from prosopography). The lotus-bud diadem may have serve as the token of temple’s gratitude to the dignitaries for their benefits or may have been a special mark of distinction given by the Ptolemies. In broad sense this diadem could be compared with the so-called “crown of justification” elevating its owner to the divine status after death. This kind of statues could have been placed in the open spaces in temples or at the city’s agora.","PeriodicalId":373435,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Institute of Oriental Studies RAS","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125354227","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.31696/2618-7302-2021-3-102-121
R. Orekhov
{"title":"EUGENIY S. BOGOSLOVSKY: ADDITIONAL STROKES TO THE PORTRAIT OF A MASTER","authors":"R. Orekhov","doi":"10.31696/2618-7302-2021-3-102-121","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31696/2618-7302-2021-3-102-121","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":373435,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Institute of Oriental Studies RAS","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125355010","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：