Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.31696/2618-7302-2021-2-211-223
V. Golovachev
The crisis of Soviet-Chinese relations and Cultural Revolution in PRC had an extremely negative impact on Soviet Sinology in 1960–1970s. In response to the new challenges, a few years after the closing of Institute of Sinology and its merger with Institute of Asian Peoples in 1961, several new centers for China Studies appeared in Moscow, reflecting a big change in trajectories of institutional evolution or the transition from mono-centrism to a new stage of Moscow Sinology’s dispersion. These centers had their own specifics and were linked by relations of partnership and competition. The personnel policy was also greatly influenced by abrupt institutional metamorphosis. Despite the fact that the small number of Sinologists graduated in 1960–1970s, the scanty demand and shortage of vacancies led to a paradoxical overproduction of specialists on China in Moscow and Leningrad, which remained the main centers of Soviet Sinology. Weak dynamics and stagnation in personnel’s career growth were aggravated by the registration regime in Moscow, which cut off all regional Sinologists, regardless of their talent, experience and knowledge of China. Competition was also hampered by discrimination based on personal data, prejudices and non-academic preferences, forcing the talented scholars to change their jobs, adjust to political needs or stay shadowed by the party ideologists and “academic propagandists”. Normalization of Soviet-Chinese relations in early 1980s evoked no noticeable institutional and personnel changes, but Soviet Sinology faced the need for radical revision of old intellectual approaches and choosing the new ones. This paper outlines the trajectories of institutional and personnel evolution of Moscow Sinology in mentioned time. The concurrent trajectories of its intellectual evolution would be reviewed in another article.
{"title":"MOSCOW SINOLOGY IN 1960–1970s: THE TRAJECTORIES OF INSTITUTIONAL AND PERSONNEL EVOLUTION","authors":"V. Golovachev","doi":"10.31696/2618-7302-2021-2-211-223","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31696/2618-7302-2021-2-211-223","url":null,"abstract":"The crisis of Soviet-Chinese relations and Cultural Revolution in PRC had an extremely negative impact on Soviet Sinology in 1960–1970s. In response to the new challenges, a few years after the closing of Institute of Sinology and its merger with Institute of Asian Peoples in 1961, several new centers for China Studies appeared in Moscow, reflecting a big change in trajectories of institutional evolution or the transition from mono-centrism to a new stage of Moscow Sinology’s dispersion. These centers had their own specifics and were linked by relations of partnership and competition. The personnel policy was also greatly influenced by abrupt institutional metamorphosis. Despite the fact that the small number of Sinologists graduated in 1960–1970s, the scanty demand and shortage of vacancies led to a paradoxical overproduction of specialists on China in Moscow and Leningrad, which remained the main centers of Soviet Sinology. Weak dynamics and stagnation in personnel’s career growth were aggravated by the registration regime in Moscow, which cut off all regional Sinologists, regardless of their talent, experience and knowledge of China. Competition was also hampered by discrimination based on personal data, prejudices and non-academic preferences, forcing the talented scholars to change their jobs, adjust to political needs or stay shadowed by the party ideologists and “academic propagandists”. Normalization of Soviet-Chinese relations in early 1980s evoked no noticeable institutional and personnel changes, but Soviet Sinology faced the need for radical revision of old intellectual approaches and choosing the new ones. This paper outlines the trajectories of institutional and personnel evolution of Moscow Sinology in mentioned time. The concurrent trajectories of its intellectual evolution would be reviewed in another article.","PeriodicalId":373435,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Institute of Oriental Studies RAS","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126879932","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.31696/2618-7302-2020-1-281-293
T. G. Pogibenko
The paper deals with representation of obligatory participants of a situation described by the verb which do not get a syntactic role in the syntactic structure of a Khmer sentence, i. e. incorporation in the verb semantic structure, excorporation into a lexical complex, deictic zero, zero anaphors. Special attention is paid to the role of lexical complex, which is a unique resource of the Khmer language, and its use for implicit and explicit representation of the participants of the situation described. An issue of a particular interest is participants’ representation as a component of a lexical complex, rather than a component of the sentence syntactic structure. Language data of Modern Khmer, Middle Khmer, and Old Khmer is used to show that this mode of representation has been used throughout the whole period of the evolution of Khmer beginning with the Old Khmer inscriptions. An attempt is made to reveal the functional character of the phenomenon discussed. It is maintained that this strategy is used for semantic derivation, for a more detailed conceptualization of the situation described, as well as for word polysemy elimination in the text. Examples are cited where lexical complexes with incorporated participants are used to make up for the inherent semantic emptiness of predicates of evaluation. In case of participants incorporated in deictic verbs, the deictic zero in Khmer may refer to participants other than “observer”. Specific features of zero anaphora in Khmer are also mentioned.
{"title":"DISAPPEARING PARTICIPANTS IN THE KHMER SENTENCE: SEMANTIC INCORPORATION, EXCORPORATION, ZERO ANAPHORA","authors":"T. G. Pogibenko","doi":"10.31696/2618-7302-2020-1-281-293","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31696/2618-7302-2020-1-281-293","url":null,"abstract":"The paper deals with representation of obligatory participants of a situation described by the verb which do not get a syntactic role in the syntactic structure of a Khmer sentence, i. e. incorporation in the verb semantic structure, excorporation into a lexical complex, deictic zero, zero anaphors. Special attention is paid to the role of lexical complex, which is a unique resource of the Khmer language, and its use for implicit and explicit representation of the participants of the situation described. An issue of a particular interest is participants’ representation as a component of a lexical complex, rather than a component of the sentence syntactic structure. Language data of Modern Khmer, Middle Khmer, and Old Khmer is used to show that this mode of representation has been used throughout the whole period of the evolution of Khmer beginning with the Old Khmer inscriptions. An attempt is made to reveal the functional character of the phenomenon discussed. It is maintained that this strategy is used for semantic derivation, for a more detailed conceptualization of the situation described, as well as for word polysemy elimination in the text. Examples are cited where lexical complexes with incorporated participants are used to make up for the inherent semantic emptiness of predicates of evaluation. In case of participants incorporated in deictic verbs, the deictic zero in Khmer may refer to participants other than “observer”. Specific features of zero anaphora in Khmer are also mentioned.","PeriodicalId":373435,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Institute of Oriental Studies RAS","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121607975","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.31696/2618-7302-2022-2-28-34
L. Chereshneva
{"title":"AUGUST 15, 1947: A LOOK FROM THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY","authors":"L. Chereshneva","doi":"10.31696/2618-7302-2022-2-28-34","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31696/2618-7302-2022-2-28-34","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":373435,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Institute of Oriental Studies RAS","volume":"C-26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126481833","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.31696/2618-7302-2023-2-117-130
Liliia R. Zaripova
The author went on a fieldwork to the state of Tripura in September–October 2022. It was done as part of the Russian-Indian Anthropological Expedition of Paleoethnology Research Center and Timiryazev State Biology Museum. The main goal was to clarify and add to the data that had been collected during a bio-anthropological research of the Tripuri people in 2019. As a result, the author was able to conduct a questionnaire survey at various educational institutions in Agartala and Khumulwng, collecting a total of 405 questionnaires. The article gives a general summary of the work done to create the questionnaire and details how it was given to Indian students in a classroom environment. This article is based on a presentation given at a meeting of the Center for Indian Studies, RAS, on November 28, 2022.
{"title":"FIELDWORK IN NORTHEAST INDIA: THE STATE OF TRIPURA","authors":"Liliia R. Zaripova","doi":"10.31696/2618-7302-2023-2-117-130","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31696/2618-7302-2023-2-117-130","url":null,"abstract":"The author went on a fieldwork to the state of Tripura in September–October 2022. It was done as part of the Russian-Indian Anthropological Expedition of Paleoethnology Research Center and Timiryazev State Biology Museum. The main goal was to clarify and add to the data that had been collected during a bio-anthropological research of the Tripuri people in 2019. As a result, the author was able to conduct a questionnaire survey at various educational institutions in Agartala and Khumulwng, collecting a total of 405 questionnaires. The article gives a general summary of the work done to create the questionnaire and details how it was given to Indian students in a classroom environment. This article is based on a presentation given at a meeting of the Center for Indian Studies, RAS, on November 28, 2022.","PeriodicalId":373435,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Institute of Oriental Studies RAS","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122194895","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.31696/2618-7302-2023-1-150-160
L. Kuras, B. Tsybenov
{"title":"MANUSCRIPT FROM THE STATE ARCHIVES OF THE IRKUTSK REGION «HISTORICAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE FRAGILITY OF THE POLITICAL SITUATION OF HULUNBUIR» AS A SOURCE ON THE HISTORY OF RELATIONS BETWEEN OUTER MONGOLIA AND HULUN-BUIR IN 1912–1915","authors":"L. Kuras, B. Tsybenov","doi":"10.31696/2618-7302-2023-1-150-160","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31696/2618-7302-2023-1-150-160","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":373435,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Institute of Oriental Studies RAS","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122261808","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.31696/2618-7302-2021-3-178-186
E. Tyulina
{"title":"DESCRIPTION OF THE SHALAGRAMАS AND THE RITUALS OF THEIR WORSHIP IN THE PURANAS","authors":"E. Tyulina","doi":"10.31696/2618-7302-2021-3-178-186","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31696/2618-7302-2021-3-178-186","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":373435,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Institute of Oriental Studies RAS","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126027385","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.31696/2618-7302-2022-1-126-139
S. Malykh
The ancient Egyptian rock-cut tomb of Nesemnau in the north-eastern part of the Giza Necropolis was explored by the Russian Archaeological Mission of the Institute of Oriental Studies RAS in 2015–2017 and 2020. Archaeological study of the three tomb shafts revealed repeated violation of the filling layers due to the numerous robberies; as a result, the original burials of the Old Kingdom were destroyed, and later pottery (827 out of 2602 ceramic samples) and artifacts entered these complexes. Pottery analysis dating from the New Kingdom to the beginning of the 20th century allows speculating on the formation of thieves’ debris in the burial shafts of this tomb. Obtained data indicates repeated human intervention into the tomb, occurring apparently in the Late Period (possibly in order to create secondary burials), in Ptolemaic and Byzantine times, in the Middle Ages and in Modern times (during the robbery). Fragments from the same vessels are present in the fillings of all the shafts in Nesemnau’s tomb; therefore, they ended in these burial complexes at the same time as a result of the one and the same group of robbers’ activities. The latest ceramic fragments belonging to the zir-jars of the 19th — early 20th centuries indicate terminus ante quem of plundering. It is probable that the increase of tourism and the beginning of large-scale archaeological excavations in Giza Necropolis at that time intensified the thieves’ activity at the ancient site.
{"title":"LATE POTTERY FROM THE ANCIENT EGYPTIAN TOMB OF NESEMNAU IN GIZA AND FEATURES OF THE FORMATION OF THIEVES’ DEBRIS IN BURIAL SHAFTS","authors":"S. Malykh","doi":"10.31696/2618-7302-2022-1-126-139","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31696/2618-7302-2022-1-126-139","url":null,"abstract":"The ancient Egyptian rock-cut tomb of Nesemnau in the north-eastern part of the Giza Necropolis was explored by the Russian Archaeological Mission of the Institute of Oriental Studies RAS in 2015–2017 and 2020. Archaeological study of the three tomb shafts revealed repeated violation of the filling layers due to the numerous robberies; as a result, the original burials of the Old Kingdom were destroyed, and later pottery (827 out of 2602 ceramic samples) and artifacts entered these complexes. Pottery analysis dating from the New Kingdom to the beginning of the 20th century allows speculating on the formation of thieves’ debris in the burial shafts of this tomb. Obtained data indicates repeated human intervention into the tomb, occurring apparently in the Late Period (possibly in order to create secondary burials), in Ptolemaic and Byzantine times, in the Middle Ages and in Modern times (during the robbery). Fragments from the same vessels are present in the fillings of all the shafts in Nesemnau’s tomb; therefore, they ended in these burial complexes at the same time as a result of the one and the same group of robbers’ activities. The latest ceramic fragments belonging to the zir-jars of the 19th — early 20th centuries indicate terminus ante quem of plundering. It is probable that the increase of tourism and the beginning of large-scale archaeological excavations in Giza Necropolis at that time intensified the thieves’ activity at the ancient site.","PeriodicalId":373435,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Institute of Oriental Studies RAS","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121720637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.31696/2618-7302-2020-4-86-95
M. E. Kuznetsova-Fetisova
Second half of the II millennium B.C. can be considered as the time when the first writing system appeared in East Asia in the form of oracle bone inscriptions jiagu wen (甲骨文). For the first time those inscriptions sparked academic interest and received recognition at the end of 19th century, though their place of origin remained a mystery for some time. At the end of the 1920s Archaeological department of Institute of History and Philology Academia Sinica initiated archaeological excavations near modern city of Anyang, Henan province, PRC, because it was implied that the oracle bones with inscriptions had originated there. Archaeological excavations reveled a great ancient center in Anyang, including a cult center, workshops, and cemeteries including royal necropolis. Due to the fact that names of rulers, known from the transmitted texts, were often mentioned in those inscriptions, it was possible to identify the site as the last capital of Shang-Yin dynasty, so-called ‘Great Settlement Shang’ (14th–11th centuries B.C.). All these make the complex rather unique for its time, as it gives us a chance to connect pre-historical and historical data. Researchers managed to determine two relative chronologies (based on archaeological and epigraphic sources) and later to interconnect them and relate to the events mentioned in transmitted texts on early political history. Still, there is a number of problems in correlating those relative chronologies with absolute dates. Up to now the greatest project to coordinate chronology of the II millennium B.C. has been the project “Chronology of the Three Dynasties: Xia–Shang–Zhou” in 1996–2000, initiated by the Chinese political figure Song Jiang. Regardless of some international criticism of the projects’ results, a great number of scholars make use of them in their studies.
{"title":"SECOND MILLENNIUM B.C. CHRONOLOGY AND THE ‘GREAT SETTLEMENT SHANG’ (14TH–11TH CENTURIES B.C.): INTRODUCTION","authors":"M. E. Kuznetsova-Fetisova","doi":"10.31696/2618-7302-2020-4-86-95","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31696/2618-7302-2020-4-86-95","url":null,"abstract":"Second half of the II millennium B.C. can be considered as the time when the first writing system appeared in East Asia in the form of oracle bone inscriptions jiagu wen (甲骨文). For the first time those inscriptions sparked academic interest and received recognition at the end of 19th century, though their place of origin remained a mystery for some time. At the end of the 1920s Archaeological department of Institute of History and Philology Academia Sinica initiated archaeological excavations near modern city of Anyang, Henan province, PRC, because it was implied that the oracle bones with inscriptions had originated there. Archaeological excavations reveled a great ancient center in Anyang, including a cult center, workshops, and cemeteries including royal necropolis. Due to the fact that names of rulers, known from the transmitted texts, were often mentioned in those inscriptions, it was possible to identify the site as the last capital of Shang-Yin dynasty, so-called ‘Great Settlement Shang’ (14th–11th centuries B.C.). All these make the complex rather unique for its time, as it gives us a chance to connect pre-historical and historical data. Researchers managed to determine two relative chronologies (based on archaeological and epigraphic sources) and later to interconnect them and relate to the events mentioned in transmitted texts on early political history. Still, there is a number of problems in correlating those relative chronologies with absolute dates. Up to now the greatest project to coordinate chronology of the II millennium B.C. has been the project “Chronology of the Three Dynasties: Xia–Shang–Zhou” in 1996–2000, initiated by the Chinese political figure Song Jiang. Regardless of some international criticism of the projects’ results, a great number of scholars make use of them in their studies.","PeriodicalId":373435,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Institute of Oriental Studies RAS","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131471243","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.31696/2618-7302-2023-2-095-105
L. Vasilyeva
One of the primary conditions of our equal participation in the world scholarly community, first of all in the countries of the regions under study, is the awareness of our foreign colleagues and their works and academic activities. The article tells about one of the most reputed Indian philologists of our time, the recently deceased S. R. Farooqi. In the Urdu-speaking world he is known as an encyclopedist who made a huge contribution to the study of the Urdu language, literature and the culture associated with this language, and changed to a certain extent the direction of the development of literary criticism in Urdu. S. R. Farooqi was also a talented poet and prose writer. His works as well as poems, stories and novels have received prestigious awards and have been translated into foreign languages.S. R. Farooqi was an unique admirer of Russian philology among Indian and Pakistani scholars; he knew practically all the works of our famous academics that are available in English and Urdu translations. The names of Russian authors and quotations from their works can be seen on the pages of his publications. There is a translation of a passage from a well-known monograph by S. R. Faruqi at the end of the article, in which the Indian scholar shares his opinion on the book by our colleague, Prof. N. I. Prigarina about the great Urdu poet Mirza Ghalib translated into Urdu.
我们平等参与世界学术界的主要条件之一，首先是在所研究区域的国家，是了解我们的外国同事及其作品和学术活动。这篇文章讲述了我们这个时代最著名的印度语言学家之一，最近去世的S. R. Farooqi。在乌尔都语世界，他被认为是一位百科全书学家，对乌尔都语、文学和与乌尔都语相关的文化的研究做出了巨大贡献，并在一定程度上改变了乌尔都语文学批评的发展方向。S. R. Farooqi也是一位才华横溢的诗人和散文作家。他的作品以及诗歌、故事和小说曾多次获奖，并被翻译成多国文字。在印度和巴基斯坦的学者中，R. Farooqi是一个独特的俄罗斯语言学崇拜者;他几乎知道我们所有著名学者的著作，这些著作都有英语和乌尔都语的译本。在他的出版物中可以看到俄罗斯作家的名字和他们作品中的引文。在文章的末尾，有一段S. R. Faruqi著名专著的译文，这位印度学者在文中分享了他对我们的同事N. I. Prigarina教授关于乌尔都语伟大诗人米尔扎·加利布(Mirza Ghalib)的书的看法。
{"title":"THE OUTSTANDING PHILOLOGIST OF INDIA, S. R. FARUQI","authors":"L. Vasilyeva","doi":"10.31696/2618-7302-2023-2-095-105","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31696/2618-7302-2023-2-095-105","url":null,"abstract":"One of the primary conditions of our equal participation in the world scholarly community, first of all in the countries of the regions under study, is the awareness of our foreign colleagues and their works and academic activities. The article tells about one of the most reputed Indian philologists of our time, the recently deceased S. R. Farooqi. In the Urdu-speaking world he is known as an encyclopedist who made a huge contribution to the study of the Urdu language, literature and the culture associated with this language, and changed to a certain extent the direction of the development of literary criticism in Urdu. S. R. Farooqi was also a talented poet and prose writer. His works as well as poems, stories and novels have received prestigious awards and have been translated into foreign languages.S. R. Farooqi was an unique admirer of Russian philology among Indian and Pakistani scholars; he knew practically all the works of our famous academics that are available in English and Urdu translations. The names of Russian authors and quotations from their works can be seen on the pages of his publications. There is a translation of a passage from a well-known monograph by S. R. Faruqi at the end of the article, in which the Indian scholar shares his opinion on the book by our colleague, Prof. N. I. Prigarina about the great Urdu poet Mirza Ghalib translated into Urdu.","PeriodicalId":373435,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Institute of Oriental Studies RAS","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121282232","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.31696/2618-7302-2023-1-069-091
S. Kuzmin
{"title":"INTERNATIONAL REACTIONS TO THE 1912 RUSSO-MONGOLIAN AGREEMENT","authors":"S. Kuzmin","doi":"10.31696/2618-7302-2023-1-069-091","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31696/2618-7302-2023-1-069-091","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":373435,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Institute of Oriental Studies RAS","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132578130","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：