Allergo Journal International最新文献

The AWMF S2k guideline “Medical clinical diagnostics for indoor mold exposure” was introduced in 2016. The guideline is based on a standardized procedure of the AWMF including a systematic literature search involving several medical disciplines. The expert group has updated this guideline in accordance with AWMF specifications. For this purpose, a new Medline search was carried out for the current version of the guideline up to June 2022 with additional search terms. The search results were evaluated and further narrowed down by means of abstract screening and, where applicable, evidence-based evaluation of the full texts. Medical guidelines on related topics were also taken into account. The updated guideline is available since October 2023. This is intended to close the existing knowledge gap for rational and efficient medical diagnostics for indoor mold contamination and provides 26 core statements and recommendations, which are presented in detail.

The AWMF (Association of the Scientific Medical Societies) mold guideline “Medical clinical diagnostics for indoor mold exposure”—Update 2023 [44] concludes that there is limited or presumed evidence of a link between indoor dampness/mold exposure and health problems. However, there is inadequate or insufficient evidence for an association between indoor dampness/mold exposure and the environmental medical syndromes sick building syndrome (SBS), multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS) and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Newly coined terms, such as biotoxicosis and mold and vapor hypersensitivity syndrome (MDHS) or volatoxins, suggest a nosological specificity of a pathophysiological connection for which, however, there is no evidence to date. The background to this assessment is presented in this paper.

Molds are ubiquitous in our environment and are considered by the population to be the most important indoor pollutant problem [1]. The current 2023 update to the AWMF mold guideline [1] is intended to allay or channel fears and provide assistance for a sensible diagnosis and treatment decision.

The detection of an IgE-mediated allergy implies for allergists Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) as an established treatment option. However, compared to the well-validated AIT with pollen and house dust mites, the decision to use AIT with mold extracts must be weighed more heavily between the benefits and risks.

Spores of Alternaria alternata are found in high concentrations in the outdoor air. Due to the high allergenic potential and the small size of the spores, an Alternaria allergy often leads to bronchial asthma, especially in children. The effectiveness of AIT with Alternaria extracts has been tested in several studies; for other molds, especially those from the indoor environment, the efficacy and applicability is very limited.

In terms of differential diagnosis, it must be borne in mind that molds can not only cause common allergic reactions but can also be responsible for allergic bronchopulmonary mycoses/aspergillosis (ABPA), Aspergillus bronchitis, exogenous allergic alveolitis (EAA), invasive aspergillosis, mycoses and rhinosinusitis. Very high concentrations, which can occur particularly in workplaces, can also result in toxic effects (“organic dust toxic syndrome”); molds are also held responsible for mucous membrane irritation, odor effects and mood disorders [1].

The prevalence of sensitization to molds is low in healthy people, but significant in asthmatics. As it has not yet been possible to establish a cause-and-effect relationship between the presence of mold allergens and the occurrence of allergic symptoms, there is a great deal of uncertainty. The update of the S2k guideline “Medical–clinical diagnostics for indoor mold exposure” should help to objectify the topic. Based on the recommendations listed there for the diagnosis of suspected IgE-mediated mold allergy, this article presents the possibilities of skin tests, IgE determinations, and other in vitro test options, but also their limitations in clarifying the cause. Potential possibilities include component-resolved allergy diagnostics, while the limitations include the difficult standardization of test allergen extracts due to the complex allergen source and the insufficient commercial availability of the test extracts. A diagnostic algorithm is presented as a tool for a systematic approach to patients with suspected mold-associated respiratory allergy.

Aspergillus-associated diseases are rare and pose challenges for practitioners. Diagnosis is complex and requires rational, targeted, and multidisciplinary collaboration, as well as a high degree of expertise and an individualized approach. For the infectious diseases physician, the focus is on the question of infection or colonization. In severely immunocompromised patients, invasive aspergillosis occurs, which most frequently affects the lungs (IPA) and is characterized by invasive, destructive growth. This acute clinical picture is associated with a high mortality rate. Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA) develops on the basis of pre-existing changes in lung structure caused by other pulmonary diseases and often requires surgical treatment. Another chronic form is allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA). It is often associated with bronchiectasis in patients with bronchial asthma or cystic fibrosis. Sinus mycoses are divided into non-invasive and invasive forms, which can occur in immunocompromised patients and most commonly affect the maxillary sinus. Here, local surgical measures are an obligatory part of treatment, whereas the non-invasive form usually has an allergic component. In addition, drug-based antifungal and/or anti-inflammatory therapy is used for all entities.

Introduction

Pharmacotherapy is the main pillar in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. While antihistamines (AH) and intranasal glucocorticosteroids (INCS) have long been part of the therapeutic standard, a pharmacological combination of both active substances in a nasal spray has so far only been implemented and made available in two preparations in Germany. Recently, an intranasal olopatadine hydrochloride-mometasone furoate (Olo-Mom) combination was introduced as a nasal spray for the treatment of seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis.

Methods

In a literature search, treatment options for allergic rhinitis were analyzed and the available evidence was determined by searching Medline, PubMed, and the national and international study (ClinicalTrials.gov) and guideline registers and the Cochrane Library. Human studies published on the topic in the period up to and including August 2023 were taken into account.

Results

Based on the international literature and previous experience, the results are summarized and recommendations are given. The drugs used in the pharmacotherapy of AR primarily include INCS, intranasal and oral AH, leukotriene antagonists, intranasal cromoglicic acid preparations, intranasal and oral vasoconstrictors, and nasal rinses. For patients with intermittent and persistent allergic rhinitis, INCS are the first-line therapy, but in many patients they do not work sufficiently or quickly enough. The fixed combination Olo-Mom nasal spray showed significant improvements in the Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) in two phase II clinical trials with twice-daily and once-daily administration. In phase III studies, Olo-Mom nasal spray administered twice daily showed significant improvements in rTNSS compared to placebo, olopatadine monotherapy, and mometasone monotherapy.

Conclusion

In summary, AH and INCS will remain the main groups of active ingredients in the treatment of allergic rhinitis in the future. In combination preparations such as the new combination nasal spray olopatadine hydrochloride-mometasone furoate, they are highly effective and safe, thus opening up new perspectives, especially for patients with moderate and severe allergic rhinitis from the age of 12 years.