{"title":"Virtual Archaeology: Remains of a Roman Villa in the Bay of Stari Trogir, Central Dalmatia","authors":"Nika Lužnik Jancsary","doi":"10.24916/IANSA.2017.2.4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24916/IANSA.2017.2.4","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":38054,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinaria Archaeologica","volume":"86 1","pages":"145-155"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78243991","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Giovanna Bosi, G. Barbieri, A. Florenzano, E. Fraulini, Maria Chiara Montecchi, Alessia Pelillo, E. Righi, Rossella Rinaldi, C. Zanasi
The Terramara Archaeological Park of Montale is an open-air museum dedicated to the enhancement of the Bronze Age terramare culture of Northern Italy. Investigation of its rich archaeological record, particularly from the archaeobotanical point of view (seeds/fruits, pieces of wood and charcoal, pollen and charcoal particles), has made it possible to reconstruct the landscape’s evolution and human-plantanimal relationships. This paper aims to present a comprehensive and exhaustive overview of the relationship between archaeology and archaeobotany in order to improve the content and exposition of the Terramara Archaeological Park of Montale, thanks to the fruitful cooperation between the Laboratory of Palynology and Archaeobotany of the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia and Civic Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology of Modena. IANSA 2017 ● VIII/2 ● 175–186 Giovanna Bosi, Giovanna Barbieri, Assunta Florenzano, Elisa Fraulini, Maria Chiara Montecchi, Alessia Pelillo, Elena Righi, Rossella Rinaldi, Cristiana Zanasi: Archaeobotany and the Terramara Archaeological Park of Montale (Emilia-Romagna, Northern Italy): Experiences of Public Education 176 development and the economic improvement of the territory. Consequently, for an efficient archaeological or historical site recovery it is essential to plan a well-defined project that shall take into account its own specific features. First of all, in a revaluation project, symbolic or cultural characteristics of the site should be assessed. Archaeological or scientific features have also to be considered, according to their important contribution in terms of knowledge and awareness. Finally, careful consideration should be given to the teaching possibilities, as these represent the strongest link between the archaeological remains and the visitors (Panosa 2012). AOAMs play a unique role in this field. Developed first in Germany and Scandinavia, while yet being relatively recent in Italy, they offer an exciting interface between scientific research and education, bridging the gap between academia and the public. By reconstructing the environments and activities of the past in a striking and evocative way, they manage to convey to a wider audience the results of excavation and research. For many of the AOAMs, a key factor has doubtless been their relationship with experimental archaeology, this developing scientific discipline having found fertile ground for testing its procedure and methods according to scientific analysis in this kind of museum, increasing the relationship between research and divulgation (Zanasi 2014a; Zanasi 2015). In addition, there is a growing demand by the public and by schools for a form of archaeology-tourism that is increasingly taking the form of edutainment. Here the learning-by-doing philosophy evinces the visitors’ emotional involvement: they are transported backwards in time, where they are immersed in the atmosphere of bygone ages. Not infrequently, this process is facil
蒙塔莱的Terramara考古公园是一个露天博物馆,致力于提高意大利北部青铜器时代的Terramara文化。对其丰富的考古记录的调查,特别是从考古植物学的角度(种子/果实,木材和木炭碎片,花粉和木炭颗粒),使重建景观的演变和人-植物-动物关系成为可能。本文旨在对考古学和考古植物学之间的关系进行全面而详尽的概述,以改善蒙塔莱特拉马拉考古公园的内容和展示,这要感谢摩德纳大学孢粉学和考古植物学实验室与雷吉欧·艾米利亚和摩德纳考古和民族学公民博物馆之间富有成效的合作。175-186 Giovanna Bosi, Giovanna Barbieri, Assunta Florenzano, Elisa Fraulini, Maria Chiara Montecchi, Alessia Pelillo, Elena Righi, Rossella Rinaldi, Cristiana Zanasi:考古植物学和蒙塔莱的Terramara考古公园(意大利北部艾米利亚-罗马涅):公共教育的经验176发展和领土的经济改善。因此,为了有效地恢复考古或历史遗址,必须规划一个明确的项目,并考虑到其自身的特点。首先,在重估项目中,应评估遗址的象征或文化特征。根据其在知识和意识方面的重要贡献,还必须考虑考古或科学特征。最后,应该仔细考虑教学的可能性,因为这些代表了考古遗迹和游客之间最强有力的联系(Panosa 2012)。aoam在这一领域发挥着独特的作用。它们首先在德国和斯堪的纳维亚发展起来,而在意大利相对较近,它们为科学研究和教育提供了一个令人兴奋的界面,弥合了学术界和公众之间的差距。通过以一种引人注目和令人回味的方式重建过去的环境和活动,他们设法向更广泛的观众传达挖掘和研究的结果。对于许多aoam来说,一个关键因素无疑是他们与实验考古学的关系,这一发展中的科学学科已经找到了肥沃的土壤,可以根据这种博物馆的科学分析来测试其程序和方法,增加了研究和泄露之间的关系(Zanasi 2014a;Zanasi 2015)。此外,公众和学校对以寓教于乐为形式的考古旅游的需求日益增长。在这里,边做边学的理念证明了游客的情感参与:他们被时光倒流,沉浸在过去时代的氛围中。通常情况下,这一过程是由穿着时代服装并精通历史重演的合格工作人员在场促进的(Zanasi 2014a;Zanasi 2015)。通过亲身体验的方式,考古公园是文化和环境遗产领域人文和科学教育的最佳工具之一。根据戴尔(2007)的说法,“现在所有部门的课程都包含了更多的文化遗产、生态和可持续性元素——特别是在科学、地理、公民和宗教教育中——但不知怎的,将事实转化为情感、将专业发展转化为企业责任、将理解转化为个人行动的整体能量并没有足够的力量。”(…)在鼓舞人心的环境中,通过令人难忘的经历将具体的理解带入抽象的科学概念是一种非常强大的教育工具,而很少有方案能够做到这一点”。2. 蒙塔莱特拉马拉考古公园和露天博物馆位于摩德纳市中心11公里处(图1a),由摩德纳考古和民族学市民博物馆于2004年建立。蒙塔莱的Terramara考古公园致力于加强波河平原地区(公元前2千年,意大利北部)的Terramara社区及其特色村庄,这些村庄代表了欧洲史前最重要和最有意义的文化实体之一(Bernabò Brea et al. 1997)。该公园的实现是长期科学研究的成果,这一研究已经开始,并且仍在进行中。在公园持久成功的基础上,有一种特殊的、持续的、渗透的关系(图1)。a) Montale的Terramara公园的位置。b)蒙塔莱特拉马拉考古公园遗址和露天博物馆平面图。 175-186 Giovanna Bosi, Giovanna Barbieri, Assunta Florenzano, Elisa Fraulini, Maria Chiara Montecchi, Alessia Pelillo, Elena Righi, Rossella Rinaldi, Cristiana Zanasi:考古植物学和蒙塔莱的Terramara考古公园(意大利北部艾米利亚-罗马涅):公共教育的经验177之间的研究和泄露,通过它,游客参与并意识到只有专家才能了解的科学问题。19世纪在蒙塔莱进行的考古发掘为公园的建立提供了科学依据,最重要的是,1996年至2001年间进行的发掘获得了数据,这些数据导致了地层序列和结构方面的发现。古代民居仅部分保存下来,占据了公园的南部地区,那里的挖掘区域被保护起来,今天是一个博物馆空间,里面有地层学和层的石膏模型。在考古区旁边,在公园的北部,露天博物馆已经建成。在这里,根据挖掘数据(Cardarelli et al. 2015a)(图1b)重建了terramara村的全尺寸区域。丰富的考古记录为居住在遗址地区的人们的日常生活提供了很多信息(Cardarelli 2009)。到20世纪初,自然科学在理解考古遗址方面变得越来越重要(Wilkinson, Stevens 2008)。事实上,对于一些地点来说,植物遗迹的研究对于获取过去人类生活的信息至关重要(Day 2013),就像Montale terramara的情况一样(Accorsi et al. 2009;Mercuri等人,2006;2006 b;2012)。在这个地点进行的考古植物分析的数量和质量为实现涉及儿童和成人的不同活动的建议提供了有用的信息。这些活动旨在解释和帮助理解陆地群落中的人-植物-动物关系(Bosi et al. 2013;Bosi et al. 2013)。这是真正的附加价值,特别是考虑到没有原始历史的书面记录:信息只能通过考古发掘和分析中发现的不同类型的材料获得。摩德纳大学孢粉学和考古植物学实验室与雷吉欧·艾米利亚和摩德纳考古和民族学市民博物馆之间卓有成效的合作自公园规划阶段开始,并仍在继续。希望这次成功的合作能够成为其他国家和国际考古露天博物馆和公园的典范。3.蒙塔莱的Terramara考古公园为游客提供了体验Terramara部分重建的机会,青铜器时代的村庄被壕沟和堤防包围,这些村庄在公元前17世纪到12世纪中期主要占据了波河中央山谷。这些古老的定居点完全由木头、粘土和植物纤维建造而成,留下了如此微弱的痕迹,只有训练有素的考古学家才能发现和解释它们。蒙塔莱的重建是基于一个坚实的科学前提:在同一地点存在一个部分保存的terra ara,在摩德纳考古博物馆进行的挖掘中发现了村庄的防御工事和住宅的遗迹,以及大量的人工制品。露天博物馆的重建现在坐落在原始定居点的遗址旁边,为游客提供了一种独特的体验,在这种体验中,重建的证据促进了对挖掘的某种程度的理解。一些教育方案是专门为学校团体设计的,其中重建的唤起性方面与考古发掘的科学方面相结合。事实上,这次参观回溯了考古学家工作的步骤:年轻的学生们从考古记录开始追溯古代定居点的历史,从而意识到考古实地工作中隐含的方法,从挖掘到分析和解释。参观从青铜时代的定居点开始(Pulini, Zanasi 2009)(图1b): 1。挖掘区域包含在一个有盖的掩体中。挖掘的垂直部分展示在后墙上,突出显示了公元前1600年至1250年间村庄生活的各个阶段。两个大型住
{"title":"Archaeobotany and the Terramara Archaeological Park of Montale (Emilia-Romagna, Northern Italy): Experiences of Public Education","authors":"Giovanna Bosi, G. Barbieri, A. Florenzano, E. Fraulini, Maria Chiara Montecchi, Alessia Pelillo, E. Righi, Rossella Rinaldi, C. Zanasi","doi":"10.24916/iansa.2017.2.6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24916/iansa.2017.2.6","url":null,"abstract":"The Terramara Archaeological Park of Montale is an open-air museum dedicated to the enhancement of the Bronze Age terramare culture of Northern Italy. Investigation of its rich archaeological record, particularly from the archaeobotanical point of view (seeds/fruits, pieces of wood and charcoal, pollen and charcoal particles), has made it possible to reconstruct the landscape’s evolution and human-plantanimal relationships. This paper aims to present a comprehensive and exhaustive overview of the relationship between archaeology and archaeobotany in order to improve the content and exposition of the Terramara Archaeological Park of Montale, thanks to the fruitful cooperation between the Laboratory of Palynology and Archaeobotany of the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia and Civic Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology of Modena. IANSA 2017 ● VIII/2 ● 175–186 Giovanna Bosi, Giovanna Barbieri, Assunta Florenzano, Elisa Fraulini, Maria Chiara Montecchi, Alessia Pelillo, Elena Righi, Rossella Rinaldi, Cristiana Zanasi: Archaeobotany and the Terramara Archaeological Park of Montale (Emilia-Romagna, Northern Italy): Experiences of Public Education 176 development and the economic improvement of the territory. Consequently, for an efficient archaeological or historical site recovery it is essential to plan a well-defined project that shall take into account its own specific features. First of all, in a revaluation project, symbolic or cultural characteristics of the site should be assessed. Archaeological or scientific features have also to be considered, according to their important contribution in terms of knowledge and awareness. Finally, careful consideration should be given to the teaching possibilities, as these represent the strongest link between the archaeological remains and the visitors (Panosa 2012). AOAMs play a unique role in this field. Developed first in Germany and Scandinavia, while yet being relatively recent in Italy, they offer an exciting interface between scientific research and education, bridging the gap between academia and the public. By reconstructing the environments and activities of the past in a striking and evocative way, they manage to convey to a wider audience the results of excavation and research. For many of the AOAMs, a key factor has doubtless been their relationship with experimental archaeology, this developing scientific discipline having found fertile ground for testing its procedure and methods according to scientific analysis in this kind of museum, increasing the relationship between research and divulgation (Zanasi 2014a; Zanasi 2015). In addition, there is a growing demand by the public and by schools for a form of archaeology-tourism that is increasingly taking the form of edutainment. Here the learning-by-doing philosophy evinces the visitors’ emotional involvement: they are transported backwards in time, where they are immersed in the atmosphere of bygone ages. Not infrequently, this process is facil","PeriodicalId":38054,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinaria Archaeologica","volume":"29 1","pages":"175-186"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74390308","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
J. Frolík, P. Stránská, J. Votrubova, Barbora Emmerova, D. Vanek
Six graves situated on the edge of the settled town suburb of Český Brod have been dated to the 2nd half of the 15th century. The group of graves situated outside the regular cemetery, and with one exception reverently buried individuals, raised the question regarding its interpretation. Anthropological study identified six men of different age with many post-traumatic changes on the bones, excessive physical strain and numerous other pathologies. DNA-based examination ruled out the possibility that they were members of minority groups (Jews, Gypsies). People buried on this site are interpreted as people in a marginal position in contemporary society. IANSA 2017 ● VIII/1 ● Online First Jan Frolík, Petra Stránská, Jitka Votrubová, Barbora Emmerová, Daniel Vaněk: People “on the Margin”: A Medieval Cemetery in Český Brod – Malechov (Central Bohemia) Online First genetics), based mainly on the verification of a possible relationship between the buried individuals. Anthropology could give the essential knowledge about the physical condition of the buried, their illness or injuries. The selection of the samples for DNA analysis was based on visual observations of the skeletal remains. It was decided to use only intact teeth as these provide a very high success rate (Katzmarzyk 2007). 2. Description of the Site and Finds 2.1 Description of the Terrain The terrain at the site was rather simple. The subsoil consisted of weathered rock (red or rusty mudstone) at a depth of 0.9– 1.2 m below the roadway surface. The individual graves (A, B, C, F and G) and also two shallow pits (feature D with a depth of 0.17 m and feature E with 0.42 m) were deepened Figure 1. Český Brod – Prokopa Velikého Street, excavated area marked with a black circle on the Cadastral contour map. IANSA 2017 ● VIII/1 ● Online First Jan Frolík, Petra Stránská, Jitka Votrubová, Barbora Emmerová, Daniel Vaněk: People “on the Margin”: A Medieval Cemetery in Český Brod – Malechov (Central Bohemia) Online First into the subsoil and had the same backfill (red-brown clayey silt [45%] with interlayers of grey clayey silt [45%] and a small amount of charcoal and daub). The pit features and graves were covered with a single layer – dark-grey sandyloamy soil [80%] with stones (mudstone [15%], pebbles [3%] and small brick fragments [2%]) – of a thickness of 0.2–0.5 m. This layer was covered with a pavement of quarry stones and dark-brown soil up to 0.3 m in thickness, which had survived only in the northern half of the trench pit. At some spots there was a charcoal interlayer below this pavement and above it the 0.3-metre-thick sand bedding of the current pavement. The terrain was disturbed by modern excavations (the holes from former old and recent sewerage work). The trench dug for the cables that had partially disturbed graves A and B, and also feature E, was situated approximately in the centre of the uncovered area. 2.2 Stratigraphy The stratigraphic situation of the found features and graves i
位于Český布罗德郊区定居城镇边缘的六座坟墓可以追溯到15世纪下半叶。这群坟墓位于常规墓地之外,除了一个被虔诚地埋葬的人之外,提出了对其解释的问题。人类学研究确定了六名不同年龄的男性,他们的骨头上有许多创伤后的变化,过度的身体疲劳和许多其他病理。基于dna的检查排除了他们是少数民族(犹太人、吉普赛人)成员的可能性。埋葬在这里的人被解读为在当代社会处于边缘地位的人。IANSA 2017●VIII/1●在线第一Jan Frolík, Petra Stránská, Jitka votrubov<e:1>, Barbora emmerov<e:1>, Daniel van<e:1>:人们“在边缘”:Český Brod - Malechov的中世纪墓地(波西米亚中部)在线第一遗传学),主要基于对埋葬个体之间可能关系的验证。人类学可以提供关于被埋葬者的身体状况、他们的疾病或受伤的基本知识。DNA分析样本的选择是基于对骨骼残骸的视觉观察。决定只使用完整的牙齿,因为它们提供了非常高的成功率(卡兹马兹克2007)。2. 现场描述及发现2.1地形描述现场地形相当简单。底土由风化岩石(红色或生锈的泥岩)组成,深度为巷道表面以下0.9 - 1.2米。单个坟墓(A、B、C、F和G)和两个浅坑(特征D深度为0.17 m,特征E深度为0.42 m)加深(图1)。Český布罗德-普罗科帕veliksamho街,在地籍等高线地图上用黑色圆圈标出的挖掘区域。IANSA 2017●VIII/1●在线首先Jan Frolík, Petra Stránská, Jitka votrubov<e:1>, Barbora emmerov<e:1>, Daniel van<e:1>:人们“在边缘”:Český Brod - Malechov(中部波西米亚)的中世纪墓地首先进入底土并具有相同的回填(红棕色粘土淤泥[45%]与灰色粘土淤泥[45%]中间层和少量木炭和涂抹)。坑特征和坟墓被单层覆盖——深灰色砂质土[80%]和石头(泥岩[15%],鹅卵石[3%]和小砖碎片[2%]),厚度为0.2-0.5米。这一层覆盖着一层采石场的石头和深褐色的土壤,厚度达0.3米,这些土壤只在壕沟的北半部幸存下来。在某些地方,路面下面有一层木炭夹层,上面是目前路面的0.3米厚的砂层。地形被现代挖掘(以前旧的和最近的污水处理工作造成的洞)扰乱了。为电缆挖掘的沟渠部分扰乱了坟墓A和B,以及特征E,大约位于未覆盖区域的中心。发现的地物和坟墓的地层情况极为简单。底土由岩石组成,其中加深了个别特征。这种情况证明了地形的清理,包括原始土壤的清除。这些特征被叠加了三次。例如,沉降特征D被坟墓G干扰,随后被坟墓A和f覆盖或干扰,同时,坟墓A也干扰了坟墓B(坟墓A的头骨被移到坟墓A的回填中)。在坟墓C2和C1的情况下,我们遇到了双重叠加。沉降特征E具有孤立的地层位置;我们认为它与最近的坟墓G的距离排除了相互接触的可能(它们之间的表面受到污水工程的干扰)。有趣的是,这些坟墓显示出双重叠加,这证明该地区不仅被用来埋葬一次,而且被反复使用——至少在很短的一段时间内。坟墓和其他特征叠加在一个单一的沉降层上,该沉降层本身被现代道路路面覆盖。路面覆盖了A、B、F和g墓地的部分。最后,在路面之上,整个地面都被今天的道路和它的垫层所覆盖。根据墓葬的方位,可分为B、C1、C2、G两组墓葬(即所有地层古墓葬+ C1墓葬),均为西北—东南走向。然而,较年轻的坟墓A和F是西南-东北方向的,这可能反映了两个不同的埋葬时期。这些坟墓的年代可以根据他们的坟墓坑的回填中发现的东西来确定,主要来自陶瓷碎片。最年轻的元素属于15世纪(内部有釉的容器碎片和滚轴印章装饰);大多数坟墓都混杂着12至15世纪的碎片。图2。Český Brod - Prokopa veliksamho街,门前的房子。 407;墓葬突出的发掘区域:浅灰色——较年轻的墓葬A和F;深灰色——其他的坟墓;P. Pinc绘制,D. Dvořáček数字化。1 m IANSA 2017●VIII/1●在线第一Jan Frolík, Petra Stránská, Jitka votrubov<e:1>, Barbora emmerov<e:1>, Daniel van<e:1>:人们“在边缘”:Český Brod - Malechov的中世纪墓地(波西米亚中部)在线第一被原始墓穴挖掘所打扰的人已经进入坟墓。其中,最古老的坟墓是G墓(内部装饰有滚轴印章和釉面的陶瓷)和B墓(没有任何陶瓷碎片)。除了A墓外,被埋葬的人的一般位置符合通常的习惯。坟墓A里的人,从他们双手的位置来看,是被不敬地扔进坑里的。没有任何衣物(纽扣、皮带扣或鞋子)的残骸表明,死者要么赤身裸体,要么只裹着一条毯子。没有棺材的痕迹(偶尔发现的钉子不能证明它们的存在),骷髅在坟墓A中的位置排除了棺材的存在。地形情况并不能清楚地表明坟墓群是完整的还是只是一个更大群体的一部分;它没有继续向西,向北或向东,在挖掘巷道的区域。墓葬可能在房子下面继续进行(壕沟坑的边缘是由于以前的排污工程而形成的);然而,我们缺乏令人信服的证据。目前还不清楚这些坟墓是否以某种方式在地表上做了标记。一个坑中有多个墓葬(C1和C2),坟墓A、B、G和F的空间划分可以作为地表标记的参数。另一方面,坟墓对B+G和A+F之间的相互关系指向相反的结论。在Český Brod的地形范围内,墓地群位于通往前皇家城镇Kouřim和Kolín的主干道上,现在是区域城镇;鉴于地形配置和Kouřimská brána (Kouřim门)的位置,这条路在过去一定或多或少有相同的路线。根据2006-2007年进行的研究,至少从13世纪开始,Kouřimské předměstí (Kouřim郊区)沿着这条路或道路蔓延,居民区在坟墓附近结束。所以这些坟墓就这样坐落在郊区的边缘。Český Brod的普通居民被埋葬在圣哥达的教堂墓地(在镇中心),1560年后,在镇中心东南的三一教堂(Poche et al. 1977, 210-211),按时间顺序排除了有问题的坟墓群。2.3个别墓葬的描述2.3.1墓葬A一个圆角长方形墓坑(保存长度:1.75 m,最大。宽度:0.45 cm,深度:0.52 m -图3)。坑的下部被污水连接工程破坏。骨架伸展着,两条腿伸展着,右臂在肘部弯曲,横放在胸前,左臂支撑着头部。下肢下半部分缺失(右腿膝盖以下,左腿脚踝)。方位:西南(头部)、东北;回填土:红棕色壤土(30%),较小石块(泥岩70%);发现:陶器碎片、石膏/灰浆的印记、建筑材料、铜丝、硬币(袋子1205和1206)和人骨(袋子1209-11)。其他的人骨是在污水处理工作的挖掘过程中被挖掘出来的(1238号和1239号袋子——没有区分坟墓A和坟墓F)。在回填中发现了一个人头骨(1208号袋子——见坟墓B)(在骨骼的上方)。图3。Český Brod - Prokopa veliksamho街,407号房子前;坟墓A和坟墓F, P. Pinc绘制,
{"title":"People “on the Margin”: A Medieval Cemetery in Český Brod – Malechov (Central Bohemia)","authors":"J. Frolík, P. Stránská, J. Votrubova, Barbora Emmerova, D. Vanek","doi":"10.24916/IANSA.2017.1.5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24916/IANSA.2017.1.5","url":null,"abstract":"Six graves situated on the edge of the settled town suburb of Český Brod have been dated to the 2nd half of the 15th century. The group of graves situated outside the regular cemetery, and with one exception reverently buried individuals, raised the question regarding its interpretation. Anthropological study identified six men of different age with many post-traumatic changes on the bones, excessive physical strain and numerous other pathologies. DNA-based examination ruled out the possibility that they were members of minority groups (Jews, Gypsies). People buried on this site are interpreted as people in a marginal position in contemporary society. IANSA 2017 ● VIII/1 ● Online First Jan Frolík, Petra Stránská, Jitka Votrubová, Barbora Emmerová, Daniel Vaněk: People “on the Margin”: A Medieval Cemetery in Český Brod – Malechov (Central Bohemia) Online First genetics), based mainly on the verification of a possible relationship between the buried individuals. Anthropology could give the essential knowledge about the physical condition of the buried, their illness or injuries. The selection of the samples for DNA analysis was based on visual observations of the skeletal remains. It was decided to use only intact teeth as these provide a very high success rate (Katzmarzyk 2007). 2. Description of the Site and Finds 2.1 Description of the Terrain The terrain at the site was rather simple. The subsoil consisted of weathered rock (red or rusty mudstone) at a depth of 0.9– 1.2 m below the roadway surface. The individual graves (A, B, C, F and G) and also two shallow pits (feature D with a depth of 0.17 m and feature E with 0.42 m) were deepened Figure 1. Český Brod – Prokopa Velikého Street, excavated area marked with a black circle on the Cadastral contour map. IANSA 2017 ● VIII/1 ● Online First Jan Frolík, Petra Stránská, Jitka Votrubová, Barbora Emmerová, Daniel Vaněk: People “on the Margin”: A Medieval Cemetery in Český Brod – Malechov (Central Bohemia) Online First into the subsoil and had the same backfill (red-brown clayey silt [45%] with interlayers of grey clayey silt [45%] and a small amount of charcoal and daub). The pit features and graves were covered with a single layer – dark-grey sandyloamy soil [80%] with stones (mudstone [15%], pebbles [3%] and small brick fragments [2%]) – of a thickness of 0.2–0.5 m. This layer was covered with a pavement of quarry stones and dark-brown soil up to 0.3 m in thickness, which had survived only in the northern half of the trench pit. At some spots there was a charcoal interlayer below this pavement and above it the 0.3-metre-thick sand bedding of the current pavement. The terrain was disturbed by modern excavations (the holes from former old and recent sewerage work). The trench dug for the cables that had partially disturbed graves A and B, and also feature E, was situated approximately in the centre of the uncovered area. 2.2 Stratigraphy The stratigraphic situation of the found features and graves i","PeriodicalId":38054,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinaria Archaeologica","volume":"38 1","pages":"59-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78362996","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This article discusses two contrasting approaches to archaeological survey using aerial reconnaissance. A more traditional strategy is to look for interesting spots in the landscape with a highly concentrated archaeological record. These are usually called “sites”. This concept is still used in everyday practice, despite its long-standing problematic character. The opposing approach divides the studied region into analytical units, which are sampled for evidence in a standardized manner and only then is the collected information subsequently interpreted. Varying densities of recorded facts across space are now studied rather than the binary categories of “on-site” and “off-site”. In Czech archaeology, this operational difference has often been classified as the “synthesizing” vs. “analytical” research methodology. This debate has been ongoing for quite some time in the context of field-walking and surface collection of archaeological finds. This text examines an analogous problem in the field of aerial survey, where it seems to be closely connected to another long-standing methodological and terminological discussion: the comparative usefulness of “oblique vs. vertical” aerial photography. IANSA 2017 ● VIII/1 ● 79–92 Ladislav Šmejda: Interpretive and Analytical Approaches to Aerial Survey in Archaeology 80 in mutual opposition to each other as regards their technical parameters and practical utility. The aim of this paper is to evaluate oblique and vertical aerial photographs in terms of the two above-mentioned survey strategies: synthesizing and analytical approach. 2. Oblique and vertical aerial photographs As their names suggest, the main criteria for distinguishing between vertical and oblique photographs is the orientation of the camera at the moment when the photograph is taken. Verticals are produced when the camera’s optical axis is oriented downwards, perpendicular to the horizontal plane. For practical reasons, a small deviation (usually less than 3 degrees) of the optical axis from the plumb line is generally tolerated. Obliques are captured by cameras that are tilted significantly from the vertical. We speak about “low obliques” when the optical axis is tilted no more than 30 degrees from the vertical, and “high obliques” that typically point around 60 degrees away from the vertical. In vertical photographs, the nadir (i.e. point on the ground directly below the camera at the time of exposure) is located approximately in their geometrical centre (principal point); while in the case of high obliques the position of the nadir is typically positioned outside the photo frame (Figure 1). Another significant difference is that verticals are often taken in so-called stereo pairs (subsequent frames have significant overlap of their ground coverage), enabling a “threedimensional” perception during visual analysis and offering advanced possibilities of precision mapping (Risbøl et al. 2015). Obliques are very rarely obtained in this way, their
本文讨论了利用空中侦察进行考古调查的两种截然不同的方法。更传统的策略是在景观中寻找具有高度集中的考古记录的有趣地点。这些通常被称为“站点”。这个概念仍然在日常实践中使用,尽管它长期存在问题。相反的方法将研究区域划分为分析单元,以标准化的方式对其进行采样以获取证据,然后才对收集到的信息进行随后的解释。现在研究的是跨越空间的不同密度的记录事实,而不是“现场”和“非现场”的二元分类。在捷克考古学中,这种操作上的差异经常被归类为“综合”与“分析”研究方法。在野外行走和地面考古发现收集的背景下,这一争论已经持续了相当长的一段时间。本文考察了航空测量领域的一个类似问题,它似乎与另一个长期存在的方法论和术语讨论密切相关:“倾斜与垂直”航空摄影的比较有用性。IANSA 2017●VIII/1●79-92 Ladislav Šmejda:考古学中航空测量的解释和分析方法80在技术参数和实际用途方面相互对立。本文的目的是根据上述两种调查策略:综合和分析方法来评估倾斜和垂直航空照片。2. 垂直和倾斜的航空照片顾名思义,区分垂直和倾斜照片的主要标准是拍摄照片时相机的方向。当相机的光轴向下定向时,垂直于水平面。由于实际原因,光轴与铅垂线的小偏差(通常小于3度)通常是可以容忍的。斜面是由从垂直方向明显倾斜的摄像机捕捉的。当光轴与垂直方向的倾斜不超过30度时,我们称之为“低斜角”,而“高斜角”通常指向与垂直方向的60度左右。在垂直照片中,最低点(即曝光时相机正下方的地面点)大约位于其几何中心(主点);而在高倾角的情况下,最低点的位置通常位于相框之外(图1)。另一个显著的区别是,垂直方向通常以所谓的立体对拍摄(后续帧与地面覆盖范围有显著重叠),从而在视觉分析期间实现“三维”感知,并为精确绘图提供了先进的可能性(Risbøl et al. 2015)。很少用这种方法获得斜腹,因此,从技术上讲,它们的分析潜力更有限。垂直和倾斜可以根据数据收集和处理的实际考虑进行比较,但不一定是充分了解航空照片实际潜力的最重要的因素。以射线为中心投射的光学传感器(所有的传统相机)所拍摄的图像都没有真正垂直(正交)地捕捉到地球表面,从而形成我们所理解的平面图或地图。图2解释了由于地形的垂直崎岖造成的图像径向畸变。任何照片的中心投影与正交地图或平面图之间都没有简单的变换关系。这种畸变的校正可以从一系列重叠的图像中计算出来,其中单个照片上的点的明显错位可以通过它们的高度差异来解释。如果没有立体成对的照片,地形的数字高程模型可以帮助将照片重新投影到水平面上(Hampton 1978)。因此,捕获数据的水平位置的调整必须始终计算垂直和斜面。对于这种类型的处理,垂直照片的问题要少得多,因为由于高度差异引起的透视失真以及位移通常随着距离最低点的距离而增加。在垂直的照片中,这些位置的变化以及形状和长度的扭曲比在高角度的斜照片中更小,更有规律地分布在相框上。然而,很明显,所有照片在用于平面测量(测量距离、角度和面积)之前都需要进行几何校正。因此,将“斜向”和“垂直”成像之间的差异与数据收集策略(综合/解释vs.垂直)联系起来似乎更合适。 分析),而不是相机的类型和方向。3.考古学家,尤其是那些不太熟悉垂直航空照片的考古学家,有时会强调这个问题(图1)。倾斜的脚印(A)和垂直的脚印(B)覆盖考古遗址的航拍照片。十字标记个别照片的最低点,即直接低于相机位置的点。请注意,在斜面的情况下,它们位于覆盖区域之外,而它们与垂直照片的中心重合(汉普顿1978之后,图9)。IANSA 2017●VIII/1●79-92 Ladislav Šmejda:考古学中航空测量的解释和分析方法81可用垂直图像的标称尺度小于考古遗产细粒度研究所需的尺度,并且没有细节可见。在许多情况下,这是真实的图像,而不是为了考古目的,但原则上,在这方面,垂直和倾斜的照片之间不应该有显著的差异,这可以很容易地举例说明。为了更好地理解这一点,我们可以考虑在胶片上成像来说明这个原理,尽管胶片在很大程度上已经被数字技术取代了(Verhoeven 2007)。我们知道胶片上图像的标称比例取决于飞行高度(高于地形的高度)和相机焦距之间的比例。当我们在海拔500米的地方用普通的手持相机和焦距f=50毫米的标准镜头拍摄风景时,我们在底片上得到的图像比例是1:10 000(500/0.05)。对于手持倾斜摄影来说,使用焦距明显较长的镜头(所谓的长焦镜头)在空中远景中大多是不切实际的,因为这种安排只能捕捉到很小的视图,而且由于飞行过程中不断的振动和湍流影响飞机及其机组人员,图像被放大得无法稳定地保持在取景器中。此外,为了避免图像模糊,需要使用快速的快门速度,因此需要大光圈,这在某些情况下可能会降低图像某些部分的清晰度。因此,在倾斜摄影中,我们很难获得比上述值更高的标称比例尺。获得大致相同比例的垂直图像并不是特别困难(例如,使用曾经常见的广角航空相机,f=152毫米,距离地面高度为1,520米)。以中欧为例,在捷克共和国的军事档案Dobruška (Břoušek, Laža 2006)中可以找到数量有限的这种比例的垂直图,尽管我们可以更频繁地在那里找到标称比例从1:20 000到1:30 000的照片。然而,大幅面底片(18×18厘米或最近的23×23厘米)可以放大而没有任何明显的细节损失。因此,我们可以得出结论,最终,我们正在使用可比较比例的放大斜向和垂直照片(另见Doneus 1997;Palmer 2005,103 - 104)。此外,从图像的前景到背景,倾斜照片的比例急剧减小,再加上透视造成的形状扭曲,通常会使部分倾斜照片无法进行详细分析。与从更高的高度垂直成像相比,使用中幅面胶卷的倾斜摄影仍然具有优势,我们可以在正面上获得更大的细节放大,但今天大多数倾斜摄影可能是用小幅面胶卷拍摄的,或者越来越多地使用数字传感器,其分辨率只是缓慢地提高到接近模拟摄影的标准。过去的研究得出结论,原始数字记录中不存在必要的数据密度(图2)。由于航空照片上地形的垂直起伏而造成图像径向畸变的概念。照片的中心投影与正交的地图或平面图之间没有简单的变换关系。畸变的校正可以从一系列重叠的图像中得到,其中单个照片上a、b、c点的明显错位可以通过它们的海拔差异来解释。利用径向线相交的方法,可以得到它们在地图上的正确位置A、B、C (after Hampton 1978,图17)。IANSA 2017●VIII/1●79-92 Ladislav Šmejda:考古学中航空测量的解释和分析方法82由于明显的技术限制,数字成像当时无法超越传统电影(Owen 2006;Verhoeven 2007)。 然而,对完全数字化工作流程的强调是强烈的,并且使用数字技术进行数据收集也有进一步的好处,这可能会决定未来
{"title":"Interpretive and Analytical Approaches to Aerial Survey in Archaeology","authors":"Ladislav Šmejda","doi":"10.24916/IANSA.2017.1.6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24916/IANSA.2017.1.6","url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses two contrasting approaches to archaeological survey using aerial reconnaissance. A more traditional strategy is to look for interesting spots in the landscape with a highly concentrated archaeological record. These are usually called “sites”. This concept is still used in everyday practice, despite its long-standing problematic character. The opposing approach divides the studied region into analytical units, which are sampled for evidence in a standardized manner and only then is the collected information subsequently interpreted. Varying densities of recorded facts across space are now studied rather than the binary categories of “on-site” and “off-site”. In Czech archaeology, this operational difference has often been classified as the “synthesizing” vs. “analytical” research methodology. This debate has been ongoing for quite some time in the context of field-walking and surface collection of archaeological finds. This text examines an analogous problem in the field of aerial survey, where it seems to be closely connected to another long-standing methodological and terminological discussion: the comparative usefulness of “oblique vs. vertical” aerial photography. IANSA 2017 ● VIII/1 ● 79–92 Ladislav Šmejda: Interpretive and Analytical Approaches to Aerial Survey in Archaeology 80 in mutual opposition to each other as regards their technical parameters and practical utility. The aim of this paper is to evaluate oblique and vertical aerial photographs in terms of the two above-mentioned survey strategies: synthesizing and analytical approach. 2. Oblique and vertical aerial photographs As their names suggest, the main criteria for distinguishing between vertical and oblique photographs is the orientation of the camera at the moment when the photograph is taken. Verticals are produced when the camera’s optical axis is oriented downwards, perpendicular to the horizontal plane. For practical reasons, a small deviation (usually less than 3 degrees) of the optical axis from the plumb line is generally tolerated. Obliques are captured by cameras that are tilted significantly from the vertical. We speak about “low obliques” when the optical axis is tilted no more than 30 degrees from the vertical, and “high obliques” that typically point around 60 degrees away from the vertical. In vertical photographs, the nadir (i.e. point on the ground directly below the camera at the time of exposure) is located approximately in their geometrical centre (principal point); while in the case of high obliques the position of the nadir is typically positioned outside the photo frame (Figure 1). Another significant difference is that verticals are often taken in so-called stereo pairs (subsequent frames have significant overlap of their ground coverage), enabling a “threedimensional” perception during visual analysis and offering advanced possibilities of precision mapping (Risbøl et al. 2015). Obliques are very rarely obtained in this way, their ","PeriodicalId":38054,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinaria Archaeologica","volume":"49 1","pages":"79-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86650190","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Andra Simniškytė-Strimaitienė, A. Selskienė, J. Vaičiūnienė, V. Pakštas, Ramūnas Šmigelskas
The geoarchaeological research summarized in this paper followed the excavation of a heavily-disturbed Bėčionys hilltop settlement site in south-eastern Lithuania. The archaeological excavation revealed a distribution of subsurface features holding few or no artefacts. According to what was left of them – stains forms, profiles, fillings and artefacts (or absence of them) – all these were registered as sunken features, without any attempt of further interpretation of possible function (midden, posthole, hearth, etc.). The features with artefacts were doubtless worthy of documentation, at least regarding the archaeological value of their infill, whereas objects holding no artefacts lacked any such reason. The overall task, therefore, was to determine any culture-related criteria for these features. Recent studies indicate that an analysis of geochemical and geophysical properties of sediments can contribute towards the detection of human occupation beyond the archaeological remains. This is because anthropogenic activity, including food preparation, fireplaces, middenning or craft-working, alters the natural sediments in recognizable ways, forming new soil characteristics that can be traced and measured through multi-analytical methodologies. To date, elevated levels of Ca, P, Cu, Fe, Mg, K, Na, Zn, etc., have been commonly found in archaeological soils and associated with specific inputs (Dirix et al. 2013; Entwistle et al. 2000; Hjulstrom, Isaksson 2009; Linderholm 2007; Linderholm, Lundberg 1994; Marwick 2005; Middleton, Price 1996; Middleton 2004; Parnell et al. 2002; Wells 2004; Wilson et al. 2008). However, the establishment of relationships between soil properties and past human activities is by no means straightforward. Ancient soil signatures are siteVolume VIII ● Issue 1/2017 ● Pages 17–33
本文总结的地质考古研究是在立陶宛东南部一个受到严重干扰的Bėčionys山顶聚落遗址的挖掘之后进行的。考古发掘揭示了地下特征的分布,其中很少或没有人工制品。根据留下的东西——污渍、形状、侧面、填充物和人工制品(或没有)——所有这些都被记录为凹陷的特征,没有任何进一步解释可能的功能的尝试(垃圾堆、后洞、壁炉等)。有人工制品的特征无疑值得记录,至少就其填充物的考古价值而言,而没有人工制品的物体则缺乏任何这样的理由。因此,总体任务是为这些特性确定任何与文化相关的标准。最近的研究表明,对沉积物的地球化学和地球物理性质的分析可以有助于发现考古遗迹之外的人类活动。这是因为人为活动,包括食物制备、壁炉、园艺或手工艺,以可识别的方式改变了自然沉积物,形成了可以通过多种分析方法追踪和测量的新的土壤特征。迄今为止,在考古土壤中普遍发现钙、磷、铜、铁、镁、钾、钠、锌等含量升高,并与特定的投入有关(Dirix等人,2013;Entwistle et al. 2000;Hjulstrom, Isaksson, 2009;Linderholm 2007;林德霍尔姆,伦德伯格1994;Marwick 2005;米德尔顿,价格1996;米德尔顿2004年;Parnell et al. 2002;井2004;Wilson et al. 2008)。然而,建立土壤性质与过去人类活动之间的关系绝非易事。古土壤特征是siteVolume VIII●Issue 1/2017●Pages 17-33
{"title":"Tracing Archaeology through Geochemistry: an Example of a Disturbed Prehistoric Hilltop Settlement Site in South-Eastern Lithuania","authors":"Andra Simniškytė-Strimaitienė, A. Selskienė, J. Vaičiūnienė, V. Pakštas, Ramūnas Šmigelskas","doi":"10.24916/IANSA.2017.1.2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24916/IANSA.2017.1.2","url":null,"abstract":"The geoarchaeological research summarized in this paper followed the excavation of a heavily-disturbed Bėčionys hilltop settlement site in south-eastern Lithuania. The archaeological excavation revealed a distribution of subsurface features holding few or no artefacts. According to what was left of them – stains forms, profiles, fillings and artefacts (or absence of them) – all these were registered as sunken features, without any attempt of further interpretation of possible function (midden, posthole, hearth, etc.). The features with artefacts were doubtless worthy of documentation, at least regarding the archaeological value of their infill, whereas objects holding no artefacts lacked any such reason. The overall task, therefore, was to determine any culture-related criteria for these features. Recent studies indicate that an analysis of geochemical and geophysical properties of sediments can contribute towards the detection of human occupation beyond the archaeological remains. This is because anthropogenic activity, including food preparation, fireplaces, middenning or craft-working, alters the natural sediments in recognizable ways, forming new soil characteristics that can be traced and measured through multi-analytical methodologies. To date, elevated levels of Ca, P, Cu, Fe, Mg, K, Na, Zn, etc., have been commonly found in archaeological soils and associated with specific inputs (Dirix et al. 2013; Entwistle et al. 2000; Hjulstrom, Isaksson 2009; Linderholm 2007; Linderholm, Lundberg 1994; Marwick 2005; Middleton, Price 1996; Middleton 2004; Parnell et al. 2002; Wells 2004; Wilson et al. 2008). However, the establishment of relationships between soil properties and past human activities is by no means straightforward. Ancient soil signatures are siteVolume VIII ● Issue 1/2017 ● Pages 17–33","PeriodicalId":38054,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinaria Archaeologica","volume":"46 1","pages":"17-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73425281","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
M. Hajnalová, Stefan Eichert, Jakub Tamaškovič, Nina Brundke, Judith Benedix, N. Pažinová, Dominik Repka
Cross-border cooperation is very important for understanding the cultural-historical development of the border regions of modern day states. These areas, today, are often considered as “peripheries”. However, in the past they usually had a very different function and status. This article introduces one bilateral mobility project between the archaeological departments at the University of Vienna and the Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, aimed at facilitating more focused early medieval archaeological research in the region along the lower stretches of the Morava River. The article introduces the region, its history and state of research and describes the role of the project, the team and the project results obtained up to date. IANSA 2017 ● VIII/1 ● 99–104 Mária Hajnalová, Stefan Eichert, Jakub Tamaškovič, Nina Brundke, Judith Benedix, Noémi Beljak Pažinová, Dominik Repka: Hic sunt leones? The Morava Valley Region During the Early Middle Ages: The Bilateral Mobility Project between Slovakia and Austria 100 (cf. Herold 2011; 2012; 2016; Henning, Ruttkay 1998; 2011; Macháček 2013; Ruttkay 2012; 2015). For these and other reasons, the cultural landscape and the early medieval settlement structure of the lower Morava River have never been researched as a single entity – a complex system consisting of various types of settlements and burial grounds. 3. The region under study Geographically, the studied area belongs to the Vienna Basin. The central axis is formed by the lower course of the Morava River. In Slovakia, the area covers the southern part of the Záhorie region (Bor Lowlands) – the territory between the river and the Lower Carpathians, delimited by the Myjava River to the north and the area of Bratislava to the south. In Austria, it covers the adjacent parts of the Marchfeld (Figure 1). While the region’s medieval material culture (e.g. ceramics and metal finds) is relatively uniform on both sides of the river, the natural environment differs. The lower elevations in both countries are covered by the level floodplains of the Morava River and its tributaries. The elevated, upland areas in Austria represent the stable loess hills of the rolling landscape of Weinwiertel. In Slovakia, almost half of the study region is covered by unstable dunes of eolithic sands (Fordinál 2012; Kalivodová et al. 2008, 10) that form a highly specific and unique environment. These differences in geology are mirrored in different soil types and vegetation. 4. A brief history of the region In the sixth and seventh century AD, Slavs settled and established new communities on the territory of what is now the Austrian, Slovakian and Moravian side of the Morava River (Fusek 2013; Fusek, Zábojník 2003). In the vicinity of Bratislava, in the southern part of the study region, there is a strong evidence for probably peaceful interactions between Slavs and Avars (Bialeková, Zábojník 1996; Herold 2010; 2014; Winter 1997; Zábojník 1989; 2009). Further to the west
IANSA 2017●VIII/1●99-104 Mária hajnalov<e:1>, Stefan Eichert, Jakub Tamaškovič, Nina Brundke, Judith Benedix, nosami Beljak Pažinová, Dominik Repka: Hic sunt leones?中世纪早期的摩拉瓦河谷地区:斯洛伐克和奥地利之间的双边流动项目从10世纪的头几十年到11世纪,摩拉瓦河的西侧(今天在奥地利境内)变成了新到达的匈牙利人和当时已经“本土”的斯拉夫人之间的边界/缓冲区(Štefanovičová 2008, 139-146)。布拉迪斯拉发地区的生活似乎一直没有中断,在考古证据中没有任何灾难性事件的迹象(Goldberg 2004;Štefanovičová 2012, 336)。布拉迪斯拉发成为匈牙利王国的政治中心和“委员会”所在地(steinh<e:1> bel 2012b)。布拉迪斯拉发西北部的情况则大不相同。在摩拉瓦河和戴耶河(三月/塔耶)和摩拉维亚中部的汇合处,出现了发展的不连续。大摩拉维亚中心遗址的崩塌在考古记录中得到了体现(Kouřil 2008;Macháček, Wihoda 2013;Štefan 2011, 344-348)。后来,在11世纪,该地区发展成为Přemyslid摩拉维亚,Árpád匈牙利和巴本堡进军之间的互动区。在11世纪的头几十年,布拉迪斯拉发地区落入波兰王国的控制之下(steinh<e:1> bel 2012b, 363)。从11世纪中叶到13世纪,Záhorie地区实际上变成了一个“无人区”。它被故意减少人口,被称为“边界”的地区再次成为Árpád王朝与其邻国领土之间的“缓冲区”(参见Hladík 2014, 61;1960年1月šak)。由于该研究区域缺乏重点考古研究,目前尚不清楚上述历史事件以及摩拉瓦河以东和以西自然环境的差异对人们的生活、定居和生存策略的影响程度和程度。5. 该项目的主要作用是找到最有效的方法和方法,使研究人员能够使用和可视化大多数已经存在的考古和环境数据,这将有助于最大限度地减少现有的偏见。实现这一目标的办法是,从考古遗址和“发现点”收集尽可能多的数据,用共同的术语和年表对它们进行描述和分类,并将它们组织起来,储存在一个单一的数据库中。计划是,收集到的数据将作为开放数据发布,并提供给更广泛的受众,甚至在项目完成后。因此,学者们将能够进行多种联合跨境分析,这是迄今为止不可能的。除其他外,在将跨区域数据转换为更适合统计分析的格式后,GIS(参见Demján, dreslerov<e:1> 2016;Dresler, Macháček 2013;Hladík 2014, 72-110;Kamermans et al. 2009;Lieskovský et al. 2013;Verhagen, Whitley 2012;Verhagen et al. 2013;Verhagen et al. 2016)和基于代理的建模(danielisov<e:1>, Štekerová 2015;Wurzer et al. 2015),这将有可能描绘出公元6世纪至11世纪期间莫拉瓦河/马奇河下游地区文化历史和经济发展的更真实的画面。
{"title":"Hic sunt leones? The Morava Valley Region During the Early Middle Ages: The Bilateral Mobility Project between Slovakia and Austria","authors":"M. Hajnalová, Stefan Eichert, Jakub Tamaškovič, Nina Brundke, Judith Benedix, N. Pažinová, Dominik Repka","doi":"10.24916/IANSA.2017.1.7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24916/IANSA.2017.1.7","url":null,"abstract":"Cross-border cooperation is very important for understanding the cultural-historical development of the border regions of modern day states. These areas, today, are often considered as “peripheries”. However, in the past they usually had a very different function and status. This article introduces one bilateral mobility project between the archaeological departments at the University of Vienna and the Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, aimed at facilitating more focused early medieval archaeological research in the region along the lower stretches of the Morava River. The article introduces the region, its history and state of research and describes the role of the project, the team and the project results obtained up to date. IANSA 2017 ● VIII/1 ● 99–104 Mária Hajnalová, Stefan Eichert, Jakub Tamaškovič, Nina Brundke, Judith Benedix, Noémi Beljak Pažinová, Dominik Repka: Hic sunt leones? The Morava Valley Region During the Early Middle Ages: The Bilateral Mobility Project between Slovakia and Austria 100 (cf. Herold 2011; 2012; 2016; Henning, Ruttkay 1998; 2011; Macháček 2013; Ruttkay 2012; 2015). For these and other reasons, the cultural landscape and the early medieval settlement structure of the lower Morava River have never been researched as a single entity – a complex system consisting of various types of settlements and burial grounds. 3. The region under study Geographically, the studied area belongs to the Vienna Basin. The central axis is formed by the lower course of the Morava River. In Slovakia, the area covers the southern part of the Záhorie region (Bor Lowlands) – the territory between the river and the Lower Carpathians, delimited by the Myjava River to the north and the area of Bratislava to the south. In Austria, it covers the adjacent parts of the Marchfeld (Figure 1). While the region’s medieval material culture (e.g. ceramics and metal finds) is relatively uniform on both sides of the river, the natural environment differs. The lower elevations in both countries are covered by the level floodplains of the Morava River and its tributaries. The elevated, upland areas in Austria represent the stable loess hills of the rolling landscape of Weinwiertel. In Slovakia, almost half of the study region is covered by unstable dunes of eolithic sands (Fordinál 2012; Kalivodová et al. 2008, 10) that form a highly specific and unique environment. These differences in geology are mirrored in different soil types and vegetation. 4. A brief history of the region In the sixth and seventh century AD, Slavs settled and established new communities on the territory of what is now the Austrian, Slovakian and Moravian side of the Morava River (Fusek 2013; Fusek, Zábojník 2003). In the vicinity of Bratislava, in the southern part of the study region, there is a strong evidence for probably peaceful interactions between Slavs and Avars (Bialeková, Zábojník 1996; Herold 2010; 2014; Winter 1997; Zábojník 1989; 2009). Further to the west","PeriodicalId":38054,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinaria Archaeologica","volume":"45 1","pages":"99-104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78859061","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Hossein Sarhaddi-dadian, Hossein Moradi, Zuliskandar Ramli, Vahid Purzarghan
The aim of this study was to determine whether pottery shards from Dahan-e Ghulaman were locally made or imported from elsewhere. Dahan-e Ghulaman is one of the most ancient settlements in Iran’s Sistan during the Achaemenid period. The study shows that the antiquity of the site goes back to the 6th and 5th centuries BC, the earthenware found in Dahan-e Ghulaman being simple and unpainted in buff and buffish red colours. However, another type of pottery also can be observed in the Dahan-e Ghulaman collection; these are painted red inside and milky outside, and are similar to ceramics from the Nadali site in Afghanistan. The dishes include short cups with wide mouths in red and orange. Archaeologists believe that most of the pottery shards are locally made; hence, to test this hypothesis, a scientific analysis was done to determine the chemical composition of the pottery shards. X-Rays Fluorescence (XRF) was applied to determine the major and trace elements of the pottery shards. The results demonstrate that most of the pottery shards are in the same group and this strongly suggests that they are local products. Additionally, based on the major and trace elements, it can be suggested that five samples are not locally made. IANSA 2017 ● VIII/1 ● 35–41 Hossein Sarhaddi-Dadian, Hossein Moradi, Zuliskandar Ramli, Vahid Purzarghan: X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis of the Pottery Shards from Dahan-e Ghulaman, the Achaemenid Site in Sistan, East of Iran 36 Greek writer, has mentioned the eleven largest and most famous cities in Drangiana (Mehrafarin 2016). Considering the archaeological evidence, most of the archaeologists believe that the site of Dahan-e Ghulaman had been the capital of Sistan during the Achaemenid period. 2. Dahan-e Ghulaman site Dahan-e Ghulaman is located about 44 km from Zabol city and 2 km from the Kale New Village in the north of the province of Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran (Figure 1). This site was discovered and excavated by Umberto Scerrato in 1960–1965 (Scerrato 1966). After the Iranian revolution, in October 2000, Seyyed Mansour Seyyed Sajjadi began a new series of excavations in Dahan-e Ghulaman (Sajjadi 2007). The reports and maps from the Dahan-e Ghulaman site prepared by the Italian demonstrate that the site was covered by dunes located alongside the Hirmand River among several historical sites (Mariani 1977; Sceratto 1962). The buildings are arranged in fairly regular rows, and due to the 120-day wind phenomenon which always blows from northwest to the southeast, all of the entrance doors are located on the southern side of the building or wind breakers have been built in front of them. The main walls of buildings have been constructed using strong bricks. The rooms’ roofs are crescent dome-shaped and they are located next to each other forming a beautiful architecture (Mariani 1977). The buildings are distributed over an area 200 m in length, from 300 m to 800 m in width and about 300 m from the dried Senate River Delta. Onl
{"title":"X-ray fluorescence analysis of the pottery shards from dahan-E ghulaman, the achaemenid site in Sistan, east of Iran","authors":"Hossein Sarhaddi-dadian, Hossein Moradi, Zuliskandar Ramli, Vahid Purzarghan","doi":"10.24916/IANSA.2017.1.3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24916/IANSA.2017.1.3","url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to determine whether pottery shards from Dahan-e Ghulaman were locally made or imported from elsewhere. Dahan-e Ghulaman is one of the most ancient settlements in Iran’s Sistan during the Achaemenid period. The study shows that the antiquity of the site goes back to the 6th and 5th centuries BC, the earthenware found in Dahan-e Ghulaman being simple and unpainted in buff and buffish red colours. However, another type of pottery also can be observed in the Dahan-e Ghulaman collection; these are painted red inside and milky outside, and are similar to ceramics from the Nadali site in Afghanistan. The dishes include short cups with wide mouths in red and orange. Archaeologists believe that most of the pottery shards are locally made; hence, to test this hypothesis, a scientific analysis was done to determine the chemical composition of the pottery shards. X-Rays Fluorescence (XRF) was applied to determine the major and trace elements of the pottery shards. The results demonstrate that most of the pottery shards are in the same group and this strongly suggests that they are local products. Additionally, based on the major and trace elements, it can be suggested that five samples are not locally made. IANSA 2017 ● VIII/1 ● 35–41 Hossein Sarhaddi-Dadian, Hossein Moradi, Zuliskandar Ramli, Vahid Purzarghan: X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis of the Pottery Shards from Dahan-e Ghulaman, the Achaemenid Site in Sistan, East of Iran 36 Greek writer, has mentioned the eleven largest and most famous cities in Drangiana (Mehrafarin 2016). Considering the archaeological evidence, most of the archaeologists believe that the site of Dahan-e Ghulaman had been the capital of Sistan during the Achaemenid period. 2. Dahan-e Ghulaman site Dahan-e Ghulaman is located about 44 km from Zabol city and 2 km from the Kale New Village in the north of the province of Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran (Figure 1). This site was discovered and excavated by Umberto Scerrato in 1960–1965 (Scerrato 1966). After the Iranian revolution, in October 2000, Seyyed Mansour Seyyed Sajjadi began a new series of excavations in Dahan-e Ghulaman (Sajjadi 2007). The reports and maps from the Dahan-e Ghulaman site prepared by the Italian demonstrate that the site was covered by dunes located alongside the Hirmand River among several historical sites (Mariani 1977; Sceratto 1962). The buildings are arranged in fairly regular rows, and due to the 120-day wind phenomenon which always blows from northwest to the southeast, all of the entrance doors are located on the southern side of the building or wind breakers have been built in front of them. The main walls of buildings have been constructed using strong bricks. The rooms’ roofs are crescent dome-shaped and they are located next to each other forming a beautiful architecture (Mariani 1977). The buildings are distributed over an area 200 m in length, from 300 m to 800 m in width and about 300 m from the dried Senate River Delta. Onl","PeriodicalId":38054,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinaria Archaeologica","volume":"20 1","pages":"35-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81550109","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper summarises the results of an investigation from the former oxbow lake near the village Náklo. The study profile (“Náklo – Under the church”) is situated near an archaeological site which is important due to the presence of pile constructions and a deposit of bronze vessels from the Halstatt Period. The study focused on the plant macroremains and xylotomy analysis. Only a few plant macroremains studies from lowland wetland sites are notable for the documented presence of archeophytes in central Europe. Our study confirmed long-term human impact and the important influence of human activities on the alluvial floodplain vegetation, especially during the Late Bronze Age and Hallstat Period. Our analysis of wood enabled the presence of alluvial forest with dominance of Salix, Populus, Alnus, and Ulmus to be reconstructed. IANSA 2017 ● VIII/1 ● 9–16 Alexandra Bernardová, Jan Novák, Vendula Vránová: The Prehistoric Wetland Site of Náklo (Moravia, Czech Republic) – a Unique Piece of History 10 sediments (Czudek 1972). Fluvisols and chernozem were mapped as the most common soils near Náklo village (AOPK 2005). The lowland area falls into the Thermophyticum phytogeographical region with a slightly dry and continental, central European climate. The mean annual precipitation is 550–600 mm, and mean annual temperature 8.5–9°C (meteorological site: Olomouc; Quitt 1971). At present, the lowland region is predominantly agriculturally managed with forests covering only a small percentage of the landscape. The current riverine forests belong to the Ulmenion alliance (Chytrý 2013), and the occurrence of Salix and Alnus is associated with river banks and wetlands. Oak-hornbeam forests (Carpinion) are typical of the drier part of the lowland, which hydrologically does not belong to the Morava river catchment. As potential natural vegetation, hardwood forests of lowland rivers (Ulmenion) and oak-hornbeam forests (un. Carpinion) have been recreated in the area (Neuhäuselová, 2001). Litovelské Pomoraví is influenced by long-term agricultural management (Čižmářová et al. 1996). A lot of findings, including chronologically almost the whole of prehistory, the Middle Ages, and the Modern Period, have Figure 1. Unique find of a deposit of bronze vessels coming from the sediments, which could be dated to the Hallstatt Period, found at the beginning of the 20th century. Figure 2. Location of the studied area. The circle marks the location of the trench where the sediement was retrieved. Source: https://geoportal.gov.cz. 0 10 km IANSA 2017 ● VIII/1 ● 9–16 Alexandra Bernardová, Jan Novák, Vendula Vránová: The Prehistoric Wetland Site of Náklo (Moravia, Czech Republic) – a Unique Piece of History 11 been obtained up to the present (e.g. Čižmář, Kohoutek 1999; Oliva 2003; Peška 2001; Wankl 1889). Among the periods of greatest population density, we can include, for example, the period of the Linear Pottery Culture (7550–6850 cal BP), Late Eneolithic (4850–4450 cal BP),
本文总结了对村庄附近原牛轭湖Náklo的调查结果。研究概况(“Náklo -教堂下方”)位于一个考古遗址附近,由于存在桩结构和哈尔斯塔特时期的青铜器沉积物,该遗址非常重要。研究重点是植物大残体和木质切分分析。只有少数来自低地湿地遗址的植物宏观遗骸研究以中欧有记载的古植物存在而闻名。我们的研究证实了人类活动对冲积洪泛平原植被的长期影响和重要影响,特别是在青铜时代晚期和哈尔斯塔特时期。通过对木材的分析,重建了以柳、杨、桤木和榆木为主的冲积林。亚历山德拉·贝尔纳多夫, Jan Novák, Vendula Vránová: Náklo(捷克共和国摩拉维亚)的史前湿地遗址-一段独特的历史10沉积物(Czudek 1972)。土壤和黑钙土是Náklo村附近最常见的土壤(AOPK, 2005年)。低地地区属于热植物地理区,气候略干,属大陆性中欧气候。年平均降水量550-600毫米,年平均气温8.5-9℃(气象站点:奥洛穆茨;收据1971)。目前,低地地区主要以农业经营为主,森林只占景观的一小部分。目前的河流森林属于Ulmenion联盟(Chytrý 2013), Salix和Alnus的发生与河岸和湿地有关。橡树角木林(Carpinion)是低地干燥地区的典型,在水文上不属于摩拉瓦河流域。作为潜在的天然植被,低地河流的阔叶林(Ulmenion)和橡树角梁林(un -hornbeam)。Carpinion)已经在该地区重建(Neuhäuselová, 2001)。litovelsk Pomoraví受到长期农业管理的影响(Čižmářová等人,1996年)。许多发现,包括按时间顺序排列的几乎整个史前时期、中世纪和现代时期,都有图1。在沉积物中发现了独特的青铜器沉积物,可以追溯到20世纪初发现的哈尔施塔特时期。图2。研究区域的位置。圆圈标出了回收沉积物的海沟的位置。来源:https://geoportal.gov.cz。9-16 Alexandra bernardov, Jan Novák, Vendula Vránová: Náklo(捷克共和国摩拉维亚)的史前湿地遗址-一段独特的历史11获得至今(例如Čižmář, Kohoutek 1999;奥利瓦2003;Peška 2001;Wankl 1889)。在人口密度最大的时期中,我们可以包括,例如,线形陶器文化时期(7550-6850 cal BP),新石器时代晚期(4850-4450 cal BP)或青铜时代晚期(3250-2750 cal BP)。2.2方法使用Kubiena锡(50×10×10 cm),在当地称为“教堂下”的地方(北纬49°39′20.3′东经17°08′03.4′)附近的沟槽中恢复了285 cm长的沉积物剖面。在沉积物恢复过程中,分别对树干、小枝和树枝进行采样。切片是从大树干上切下来的。然后对剖面进行沉积学描述,并以3厘米的间隔定期取样。沉积物样品通过0.25 mm筛子洗涤。宏观残余物是通过参考文献收集和测定文献,如Anderberg(1994)、Berggren(1981)和Cappers等(2006)挑选和鉴定出来的。由于沉积物是沙质的,并且几个测试样品的花粉浓度很低,不具有代表性,因此没有对样品进行花粉分析。另一个摩拉维亚地区Únanovka的研究也遇到了类似的问题(Petřík et al. 2015)。宏观化石图是在Tilia程序中创建的(Grimm 2011)。命名法遵循捷克植物区系的确定关键(Kubát等人,2002年)。木材碎片在参考收集和标准识别钥匙的帮助下被识别(Greguss 1972;Schweingruber 1990)使用200 - 500倍放大率的光学显微镜。木材碎片被量化为分析碎片的数量。植物大化石在波兹纳斯放射性碳实验室用于AMS放射性碳定年。对于木片的放射性碳定年,样品被送到中国科学院核物理研究所放射性碳实验室。基于IntCal 13 (Reimer et al. 2013)校准曲线,使用OxCal 4.2在线应用程序(Ramsey 2009)将14C数据校准为日历年龄。
{"title":"The Prehistoric Wetland Site of Náklo (Moravia, Czech Republic) – a Unique Piece of History","authors":"A. Bernardová, J. Novák, Vendula Vránová","doi":"10.24916/IANSA.2017.1.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24916/IANSA.2017.1.1","url":null,"abstract":"This paper summarises the results of an investigation from the former oxbow lake near the village Náklo. The study profile (“Náklo – Under the church”) is situated near an archaeological site which is important due to the presence of pile constructions and a deposit of bronze vessels from the Halstatt Period. The study focused on the plant macroremains and xylotomy analysis. Only a few plant macroremains studies from lowland wetland sites are notable for the documented presence of archeophytes in central Europe. Our study confirmed long-term human impact and the important influence of human activities on the alluvial floodplain vegetation, especially during the Late Bronze Age and Hallstat Period. Our analysis of wood enabled the presence of alluvial forest with dominance of Salix, Populus, Alnus, and Ulmus to be reconstructed. IANSA 2017 ● VIII/1 ● 9–16 Alexandra Bernardová, Jan Novák, Vendula Vránová: The Prehistoric Wetland Site of Náklo (Moravia, Czech Republic) – a Unique Piece of History 10 sediments (Czudek 1972). Fluvisols and chernozem were mapped as the most common soils near Náklo village (AOPK 2005). The lowland area falls into the Thermophyticum phytogeographical region with a slightly dry and continental, central European climate. The mean annual precipitation is 550–600 mm, and mean annual temperature 8.5–9°C (meteorological site: Olomouc; Quitt 1971). At present, the lowland region is predominantly agriculturally managed with forests covering only a small percentage of the landscape. The current riverine forests belong to the Ulmenion alliance (Chytrý 2013), and the occurrence of Salix and Alnus is associated with river banks and wetlands. Oak-hornbeam forests (Carpinion) are typical of the drier part of the lowland, which hydrologically does not belong to the Morava river catchment. As potential natural vegetation, hardwood forests of lowland rivers (Ulmenion) and oak-hornbeam forests (un. Carpinion) have been recreated in the area (Neuhäuselová, 2001). Litovelské Pomoraví is influenced by long-term agricultural management (Čižmářová et al. 1996). A lot of findings, including chronologically almost the whole of prehistory, the Middle Ages, and the Modern Period, have Figure 1. Unique find of a deposit of bronze vessels coming from the sediments, which could be dated to the Hallstatt Period, found at the beginning of the 20th century. Figure 2. Location of the studied area. The circle marks the location of the trench where the sediement was retrieved. Source: https://geoportal.gov.cz. 0 10 km IANSA 2017 ● VIII/1 ● 9–16 Alexandra Bernardová, Jan Novák, Vendula Vránová: The Prehistoric Wetland Site of Náklo (Moravia, Czech Republic) – a Unique Piece of History 11 been obtained up to the present (e.g. Čižmář, Kohoutek 1999; Oliva 2003; Peška 2001; Wankl 1889). Among the periods of greatest population density, we can include, for example, the period of the Linear Pottery Culture (7550–6850 cal BP), Late Eneolithic (4850–4450 cal BP), ","PeriodicalId":38054,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinaria Archaeologica","volume":"96 1","pages":"9-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86282446","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Spindelbach was a Waldhufendorf type of village, i.e. every household could manage its own fields independently of other households. Our study has importance for research on the economic and social development between the Medieval and Modern Era and for studies of human impact. Performing soil and geochemical mapping, we have identified four geochemical factors in a clearly interpretable pattern: 1) general geology and soil environment (represented mainly by Al, Si, K, Ti, Rb, Sr and Zr) contrasting with the soil organic matter and with pollution coming from atmospheric deposition (P, As, Pb and LE – elements from H to Na); 2) modern pollution and possible historical human activity (mainly As and Pb vs Zn, Fe and Mn); 3) historical human activity related to the village (Zn and Sr); and 4) additional historical human activity of another spatial pattern (P). Although there was no unambiguous relation between podzolization and the human activities observed, generally podzol development was very rapid (it was positively observed on sites ploughed ca 600 years ago). Differences among the households’ agricultural managements were observed; these could be based on: 1) types of land use in the village area; 2) management intensity; and 3) the subjective management preferences of the peasants. The differences were manifested by their intensity and by their spatial
Spindelbach是Waldhufendorf类型的村庄,即每个家庭都可以独立于其他家庭管理自己的田地。我们的研究对于研究中世纪和现代之间的经济和社会发展以及人类影响的研究具有重要意义。通过土壤和地球化学填图,我们确定了具有清晰解释模式的四个地球化学因子:1)一般地质和土壤环境(主要以Al、Si、K、Ti、Rb、Sr和Zr为代表)与土壤有机质和大气沉降污染(P、As、Pb和LE -元素从H到Na)的对比;2)现代污染和可能的历史人类活动(主要是As和Pb vs Zn, Fe和Mn);3)与村落相关的历史人类活动(Zn和Sr);4)另外一种空间格局的历史人类活动(P)。尽管灰化化与观测到的人类活动之间没有明确的关系,但总体而言,灰化化的发展非常迅速(在大约600年前的耕地遗址上观察到灰化化是积极的)。农户农业经营方式存在差异;这些可以基于:1)村庄地区的土地利用类型;2)管理强度;农民的主观经营偏好。差异表现在强度和空间上
{"title":"Pedogenesis, Pedochemistry and the Functional Structure of the Waldhufendorf Field System of the Deserted Medieval Village Spindelbach, the Czech Republic","authors":"J. Horák, T. Klír","doi":"10.24916/IANSA.2017.1.4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24916/IANSA.2017.1.4","url":null,"abstract":"Spindelbach was a Waldhufendorf type of village, i.e. every household could manage its own fields independently of other households. Our study has importance for research on the economic and social development between the Medieval and Modern Era and for studies of human impact. Performing soil and geochemical mapping, we have identified four geochemical factors in a clearly interpretable pattern: 1) general geology and soil environment (represented mainly by Al, Si, K, Ti, Rb, Sr and Zr) contrasting with the soil organic matter and with pollution coming from atmospheric deposition (P, As, Pb and LE – elements from H to Na); 2) modern pollution and possible historical human activity (mainly As and Pb vs Zn, Fe and Mn); 3) historical human activity related to the village (Zn and Sr); and 4) additional historical human activity of another spatial pattern (P). Although there was no unambiguous relation between podzolization and the human activities observed, generally podzol development was very rapid (it was positively observed on sites ploughed ca 600 years ago). Differences among the households’ agricultural managements were observed; these could be based on: 1) types of land use in the village area; 2) management intensity; and 3) the subjective management preferences of the peasants. The differences were manifested by their intensity and by their spatial","PeriodicalId":38054,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinaria Archaeologica","volume":"25 1","pages":"43-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75551443","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rescue archaeological excavation in Puchmajerova Street, Ostrava, Czech Republic, has resulted in the discovery of approximately 40 graves dating back to the Early Modern Period. One of the graves, number 841, connected with the last stage of the cemetery’s existence, has provided human bones in a very poor state of preservation. These have been anthropologically analysed and subsequently interpreted as the remains of a woman who died in her young adult life (20–25 years). The skeleton number 841 shows traces of dissection-like intervention in the right parietal bone and squama of the frontal bone, which has proved to be a key factor for subsequent investigations. Based on archaeological findings (the dating and grave inventory), anthropological assessment (sex, age and dissection traces), and written sources (registers of deaths), we have been able to identify this skeleton as the remains of the Ostrava burgher Marianna Máchová (1817–1837), who committed suicide in 1837. IANSA 2016 ● VII/2 ● 197–205 Michal Živný, Zbyněk Moravec: Traces of Dissection on Human Skeletal Remains of the First Half of 19th Century from Ostrava, Czech Republic 198 identify the skeleton with a known person, and subsequently to look deeper into her life by means of the available written sources. Thus the skeletal remains from grave number 841 play a major role in this paper. The primary goal is to refer to the rare and unusual archaeological find of a postmortem invasion into the skull. The identification of the skeletal remains with a real historical person who has provided recorded information on the said postmortem manipulation is regarded as proof as to the correctness of our observations. 2. Material and methods 2.1 Archaeological background Grave number 841 was situated in the very latest (most recent) group of burials at our cemetery. It is dated back to the period 1785–1843 and, in agreement with the funeral practices of that times, it was placed in a single line. The eastern (or lower) half of the grave (and skeletal remains) did not still exist at the time of our archaeological excavation, having been already removed by earlier building activities on the cemetery site. Thus only the western (or upper) half of the grave had been preserved for subsequent research (Figure 1). The grave was oriented in a NW–SE direction. There were poorly preserved human skeletal remains in a stretched supine position in the grave pit, with the upper extremities bent at the elbow joints and hands laid on the chest. Furthermore, the remains of a wooden coffin were detected around the skeleton (Moravec et al. 2014, 68–69). In contrast to the condition of the skeletal remains themselves, these wooden residues represent the best preserved coffin remnants at our cemetery. The coffin was originally closed by iron nails and was Figure 1. Skeleton number 841: field excavation. Taken from Moravec et al. 2014. IANSA 2016 ● VII/2 ● 197–205 Michal Živný, Zbyněk Moravec: Traces of Dissection on
{"title":"Traces of Dissection on Human Skeletal Remains of the First Half of 19th Century from Ostrava, Czech Republic","authors":"Michal Živný, Z. Moravec","doi":"10.24916/IANSA.2016.2.5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24916/IANSA.2016.2.5","url":null,"abstract":"Rescue archaeological excavation in Puchmajerova Street, Ostrava, Czech Republic, has resulted in the discovery of approximately 40 graves dating back to the Early Modern Period. One of the graves, number 841, connected with the last stage of the cemetery’s existence, has provided human bones in a very poor state of preservation. These have been anthropologically analysed and subsequently interpreted as the remains of a woman who died in her young adult life (20–25 years). The skeleton number 841 shows traces of dissection-like intervention in the right parietal bone and squama of the frontal bone, which has proved to be a key factor for subsequent investigations. Based on archaeological findings (the dating and grave inventory), anthropological assessment (sex, age and dissection traces), and written sources (registers of deaths), we have been able to identify this skeleton as the remains of the Ostrava burgher Marianna Máchová (1817–1837), who committed suicide in 1837. IANSA 2016 ● VII/2 ● 197–205 Michal Živný, Zbyněk Moravec: Traces of Dissection on Human Skeletal Remains of the First Half of 19th Century from Ostrava, Czech Republic 198 identify the skeleton with a known person, and subsequently to look deeper into her life by means of the available written sources. Thus the skeletal remains from grave number 841 play a major role in this paper. The primary goal is to refer to the rare and unusual archaeological find of a postmortem invasion into the skull. The identification of the skeletal remains with a real historical person who has provided recorded information on the said postmortem manipulation is regarded as proof as to the correctness of our observations. 2. Material and methods 2.1 Archaeological background Grave number 841 was situated in the very latest (most recent) group of burials at our cemetery. It is dated back to the period 1785–1843 and, in agreement with the funeral practices of that times, it was placed in a single line. The eastern (or lower) half of the grave (and skeletal remains) did not still exist at the time of our archaeological excavation, having been already removed by earlier building activities on the cemetery site. Thus only the western (or upper) half of the grave had been preserved for subsequent research (Figure 1). The grave was oriented in a NW–SE direction. There were poorly preserved human skeletal remains in a stretched supine position in the grave pit, with the upper extremities bent at the elbow joints and hands laid on the chest. Furthermore, the remains of a wooden coffin were detected around the skeleton (Moravec et al. 2014, 68–69). In contrast to the condition of the skeletal remains themselves, these wooden residues represent the best preserved coffin remnants at our cemetery. The coffin was originally closed by iron nails and was Figure 1. Skeleton number 841: field excavation. Taken from Moravec et al. 2014. IANSA 2016 ● VII/2 ● 197–205 Michal Živný, Zbyněk Moravec: Traces of Dissection on","PeriodicalId":38054,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinaria Archaeologica","volume":"70 1","pages":"197-205"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84627599","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}