Pub Date : 2020-12-14DOI: 10.24843/AC.2020.V05.I03.P02
Claudia Verena Maudy Sridana, I. K. Westra
As a public official who works as a notary public has the authority to be able to make an authentic deed. As a notary in carrying out his commitment to make an authentic deed, the Notary gets approval to provide his services for free or voluntarily to people who are not capable in the financial field. How can you ask for legal assistance by a notary in the free notary area for people who can't afford it? Problems related to legal notifications to notaries who refuse to provide legal assistance in the field of notary to those who are unable? The purpose of the discussion is to analyze and discuss the request for legal assistance by a notary in the notary sector not providing legal assistance in the notary sector for people who cannot afford. This research uses empirical legal research methods, primary data and secondary data obtained were analyzed qualitatively and arranged systematically, which was collected by literature study and interview techniques. The conclusion of this research is the notary in providing his services without collecting honorariums is not only given to people who can not afford it, but notaries can provide free services to those who want to make a foundation or activities in the social, social and dialogue. The legal consequences of notaries who are reluctant to provide legal assistance to people who are not in accordance with the provisions of the sanctions provided for in Article 37 paragraph (2) of the UUJN are also in accordance with the provisions in the Code of Ethics I.N.I.
{"title":"Kewajiban Pemberian Jasa Hukum Secara Cuma-Cuma Oleh Notaris Pada Orang Tidak Mampu","authors":"Claudia Verena Maudy Sridana, I. K. Westra","doi":"10.24843/AC.2020.V05.I03.P02","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2020.V05.I03.P02","url":null,"abstract":"As a public official who works as a notary public has the authority to be able to make an authentic deed. As a notary in carrying out his commitment to make an authentic deed, the Notary gets approval to provide his services for free or voluntarily to people who are not capable in the financial field. How can you ask for legal assistance by a notary in the free notary area for people who can't afford it? Problems related to legal notifications to notaries who refuse to provide legal assistance in the field of notary to those who are unable? The purpose of the discussion is to analyze and discuss the request for legal assistance by a notary in the notary sector not providing legal assistance in the notary sector for people who cannot afford. This research uses empirical legal research methods, primary data and secondary data obtained were analyzed qualitatively and arranged systematically, which was collected by literature study and interview techniques. The conclusion of this research is the notary in providing his services without collecting honorariums is not only given to people who can not afford it, but notaries can provide free services to those who want to make a foundation or activities in the social, social and dialogue. The legal consequences of notaries who are reluctant to provide legal assistance to people who are not in accordance with the provisions of the sanctions provided for in Article 37 paragraph (2) of the UUJN are also in accordance with the provisions in the Code of Ethics I.N.I.","PeriodicalId":381646,"journal":{"name":"Acta Comitas","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124391731","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-14DOI: 10.24843/AC.2020.V05.I03.P05
I. G. Suryawan, Dewa Nyoman Rai Asmara Putra
In accordance with the Decree of the Minister of Justice and Human Rights Number M-05 HT.01.01 of 2002 concerning the Enforcement of the Legal Entity Administration System at the Directorate General of General Legal Administration of the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia, determines that all legal entity settlements include the ratification of the deed of establishment PT, application for approval and submission of deed reports, amendments to articles of association, fiduciary registration, will registration, are carried out with the online Legal Entity Administration System. So the notary has the authority to register all these legal acts online. The purpose of this research is to find out the role of the Notary in registering deeds and legalization of legal entities through the Directorate General of AHU Online services and to find out the responsibilities of the Notary if there are problems in registering deeds and legal entity approval through the services of the Directorate General of AHU Online. This study uses a normative juridical research method using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of the research, namely, the role of the notary in registering deeds and ratifying legal entities is entering deed data, checking all deed data to avoid data entry errors and the notary has the responsibility if there is an error from the notary's office, the notary will make corrections at a cost of Notary, however in this regard there is still cooperation from the applicant regarding the required data.
{"title":"Tanggung Jawab Notaris Menggunakan Layanan Ditjen Ahu Online Dalam Hal Pendaftaran Akta Dan Pengesahan Badan Hukum","authors":"I. G. Suryawan, Dewa Nyoman Rai Asmara Putra","doi":"10.24843/AC.2020.V05.I03.P05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2020.V05.I03.P05","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 \u0000 \u0000In accordance with the Decree of the Minister of Justice and Human Rights Number M-05 HT.01.01 of 2002 concerning the Enforcement of the Legal Entity Administration System at the Directorate General of General Legal Administration of the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia, determines that all legal entity settlements include the ratification of the deed of establishment PT, application for approval and submission of deed reports, amendments to articles of association, fiduciary registration, will registration, are carried out with the online Legal Entity Administration System. So the notary has the authority to register all these legal acts online. The purpose of this research is to find out the role of the Notary in registering deeds and legalization of legal entities through the Directorate General of AHU Online services and to find out the responsibilities of the Notary if there are problems in registering deeds and legal entity approval through the services of the Directorate General of AHU Online. This study uses a normative juridical research method using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of the research, namely, the role of the notary in registering deeds and ratifying legal entities is entering deed data, checking all deed data to avoid data entry errors and the notary has the responsibility if there is an error from the notary's office, the notary will make corrections at a cost of Notary, however in this regard there is still cooperation from the applicant regarding the required data. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000","PeriodicalId":381646,"journal":{"name":"Acta Comitas","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133001286","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-14DOI: 10.24843/AC.2020.V05.I03.P01
Wulan Wiryantari Dewi, R. Ibrahim
The notary's role is to provide legal protection to the people who use his services. The presence of a Notary is indispensable for the community concerned to hold a legal relationship with other individuals so that the Notary may also be liable. In the provisions of Article 16 paragraph (1) letter c of the Amendment Law, it is stipulated that in carrying out his position, the Notary is required to attach fingerprints on the minutes of the deed, giving rise to various polemics, because the said provisions do not stipulate further if in this case the smoker suffers from finger defects or events that result in damage to fingerprints which makes the investigator unable to put his fingerprint. The purpose of this research is to find out how the efforts that can be done by a notary against those who are unable to put fingerprints and the legal consequences of the absence of fingerprints against the strength of the deed. This research is a type of normative legal research. The results of this study indicate that efforts can be made by a notary if there are those who suffer from finger defects or experience events that cause fingerprint damage so that they cannot attach their fingerprints to the minutes of the deed, the relevant Notary can explain the matter at the end of the deed. he made it because the fingerprints attached to the address are an act that is required to a notary that can lead to administrative sanctions as contained in the Amendment Law. Due to the legal absence of fingerprints attached to the strength of the deed that is the deed made by the relevant Notary Public remains an authentic deed even though the fingerprints of the tappers are not attached based on Article 1869 of the Civil Code and the deed is valid and legally binding as long as the provisions contained in Article 1320 are fulfilled Civil Code.
{"title":"Kekuatan Hukum Pelekatan Sidik Jari Penghadap Oleh Notaris Pada Minuta Akta","authors":"Wulan Wiryantari Dewi, R. Ibrahim","doi":"10.24843/AC.2020.V05.I03.P01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2020.V05.I03.P01","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000The notary's role is to provide legal protection to the people who use his services. The presence of a Notary is indispensable for the community concerned to hold a legal relationship with other individuals so that the Notary may also be liable. In the provisions of Article 16 paragraph (1) letter c of the Amendment Law, it is stipulated that in carrying out his position, the Notary is required to attach fingerprints on the minutes of the deed, giving rise to various polemics, because the said provisions do not stipulate further if in this case the smoker suffers from finger defects or events that result in damage to fingerprints which makes the investigator unable to put his fingerprint. The purpose of this research is to find out how the efforts that can be done by a notary against those who are unable to put fingerprints and the legal consequences of the absence of fingerprints against the strength of the deed. This research is a type of normative legal research. The results of this study indicate that efforts can be made by a notary if there are those who suffer from finger defects or experience events that cause fingerprint damage so that they cannot attach their fingerprints to the minutes of the deed, the relevant Notary can explain the matter at the end of the deed. he made it because the fingerprints attached to the address are an act that is required to a notary that can lead to administrative sanctions as contained in the Amendment Law. Due to the legal absence of fingerprints attached to the strength of the deed that is the deed made by the relevant Notary Public remains an authentic deed even though the fingerprints of the tappers are not attached based on Article 1869 of the Civil Code and the deed is valid and legally binding as long as the provisions contained in Article 1320 are fulfilled Civil Code. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000","PeriodicalId":381646,"journal":{"name":"Acta Comitas","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130363959","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-14DOI: 10.24843/AC.2020.V05.I03.P03
Gilang Bella Saputra, I. Priyanto
Roya Partial is a new legal institution formed, by providing an alternative settlement of repayment on a credit basis by paying off a portion of the credit that goes by pulling some of its collateral. “Article 2 of the Law No. 4-year 1996 on land rights and objects relating to the land”, giving gaps in the performance of Roya Partial. Whereas article 1163 Civil Code states the rights of liabilities (mortgages) are not indivisible but bind all parts of the goods/moving objects. This can actually lead to a conflict of norms against both regulations. Based on that, formulated 2 problems 1) What is the legal basis of the implementation of a partial Roya, (2) How to process the implementation of Roya Partial in notary Office, the purpose of this research is to know the legal basis in the implementation of a partial roya and to know the process of implementing Roya Partial in notary office. The legal research method used is a normative legal research method of using a statutory approach, and a conceptual approach. Right to land that can be burdened by article 4 UUHT Jo article 25, 33, 39 UUPA namely: property rights, business rights, building rights, rights, houses and property rights in the unit and there are several procedures regarding the deletion of liabilities from the settlement to the execution of the force, then the method of implementation of a partial Roya notary office.
{"title":"Proses Pelaksanaan Roya Partial Pada Kantor Notaris","authors":"Gilang Bella Saputra, I. Priyanto","doi":"10.24843/AC.2020.V05.I03.P03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2020.V05.I03.P03","url":null,"abstract":"Roya Partial is a new legal institution formed, by providing an alternative settlement of repayment on a credit basis by paying off a portion of the credit that goes by pulling some of its collateral. “Article 2 of the Law No. 4-year 1996 on land rights and objects relating to the land”, giving gaps in the performance of Roya Partial. Whereas article 1163 Civil Code states the rights of liabilities (mortgages) are not indivisible but bind all parts of the goods/moving objects. This can actually lead to a conflict of norms against both regulations. Based on that, formulated 2 problems 1) What is the legal basis of the implementation of a partial Roya, (2) How to process the implementation of Roya Partial in notary Office, the purpose of this research is to know the legal basis in the implementation of a partial roya and to know the process of implementing Roya Partial in notary office. The legal research method used is a normative legal research method of using a statutory approach, and a conceptual approach. Right to land that can be burdened by article 4 UUHT Jo article 25, 33, 39 UUPA namely: property rights, business rights, building rights, rights, houses and property rights in the unit and there are several procedures regarding the deletion of liabilities from the settlement to the execution of the force, then the method of implementation of a partial Roya notary office.","PeriodicalId":381646,"journal":{"name":"Acta Comitas","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127894182","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-14DOI: 10.24843/AC.2020.V05.I03.P10
Ni Kadek Ditha Angreni, I. N. Bagiastra
Proof of the sale and purchase of land rights without being accompanied by the deed of the Land Deed Author of which one of the parties dies, then in this condition the heir does not recognize the underhand agreement or because he knows that one of the parties who binds himself has died, then the other does not fulfilling his achievements. This research will try to examine issues regarding the proof of sale and purchase of land rights that are not proven by the Official Certifier Of Title Deeds if one party dies This research was carried out through a normative legal study method with using statute approach and conceptual approach. After going through discussion and analysis, finally, it can be concluded that Land purchase agreements made under legal hands under Article 1320 Indonesian Civil Code and fulfill the conditions of the sale and purchase agreements under customary law, but do not necessarily transfer the rights to their land. Proof of agreement on the sale and purchase of land rights made under the hand if one of his parties dies can be done with affidavit.
{"title":"Affidavit Sebagai Alat Bukti Terhadap Perjanjian Jual-Beli Dibawah Tangan Apabila Salah Satu Pihaknya Meninggal Dunia","authors":"Ni Kadek Ditha Angreni, I. N. Bagiastra","doi":"10.24843/AC.2020.V05.I03.P10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2020.V05.I03.P10","url":null,"abstract":"Proof of the sale and purchase of land rights without being accompanied by the deed of the Land Deed Author of which one of the parties dies, then in this condition the heir does not recognize the underhand agreement or because he knows that one of the parties who binds himself has died, then the other does not fulfilling his achievements. This research will try to examine issues regarding the proof of sale and purchase of land rights that are not proven by the Official Certifier Of Title Deeds if one party dies This research was carried out through a normative legal study method with using statute approach and conceptual approach. After going through discussion and analysis, finally, it can be concluded that Land purchase agreements made under legal hands under Article 1320 Indonesian Civil Code and fulfill the conditions of the sale and purchase agreements under customary law, but do not necessarily transfer the rights to their land. Proof of agreement on the sale and purchase of land rights made under the hand if one of his parties dies can be done with affidavit.","PeriodicalId":381646,"journal":{"name":"Acta Comitas","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130542212","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-14DOI: 10.24843/AC.2020.V05.I03.P06
Ni Komang Devayanti Dewi, Putu Tuni Cakabawa Landra
Many local Indonesian assets have not been protected by Geographical Indications and very vulnerable to being exploited by irresponsible parties, one of which is cybersquatting crime by registering a website address on the internet using the name of a geographically indicated product without the right as the legal owner then selling the domain name for expensive price causing losses for local Indonesian assets that have not been registered with Geographical Indications. The problem of this research: How is the legal protection on local assets that have not yet registered as Geogragraphical Indication from cybersquatting crime. The purpose of this research is to find out the legal protection of unregistered local asset as geographical indication product from cybersquatting. The legal research method used is the normative legal research method using the statutory approach and the conceptual approach. The result of the research is the protection of local assets from cybersquatting crimes that have not been protected by Geographical Indications is protected under Article 23 of the ITE Law and for every person whose rights are violated due to cybersquatting crimes, they have the right to file a lawsuit to cancel the unauthorized use of domain names by other parties.
{"title":"Perlindungan Aset Lokal Yang Belum Terdaftar Indikasi Geografis Dari Kejahatan Cybersquatting","authors":"Ni Komang Devayanti Dewi, Putu Tuni Cakabawa Landra","doi":"10.24843/AC.2020.V05.I03.P06","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2020.V05.I03.P06","url":null,"abstract":"Many local Indonesian assets have not been protected by Geographical Indications and very vulnerable to being exploited by irresponsible parties, one of which is cybersquatting crime by registering a website address on the internet using the name of a geographically indicated product without the right as the legal owner then selling the domain name for expensive price causing losses for local Indonesian assets that have not been registered with Geographical Indications. The problem of this research: How is the legal protection on local assets that have not yet registered as Geogragraphical Indication from cybersquatting crime. The purpose of this research is to find out the legal protection of unregistered local asset as geographical indication product from cybersquatting. The legal research method used is the normative legal research method using the statutory approach and the conceptual approach. The result of the research is the protection of local assets from cybersquatting crimes that have not been protected by Geographical Indications is protected under Article 23 of the ITE Law and for every person whose rights are violated due to cybersquatting crimes, they have the right to file a lawsuit to cancel the unauthorized use of domain names by other parties.","PeriodicalId":381646,"journal":{"name":"Acta Comitas","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125176056","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-14DOI: 10.24843/AC.2020.V05.I03.P09
Dentria Cahya Sudarsa, I. W. Parsa
The writing of this article is based on the issuance of new regulations regarding the establishment and registration of limited partnership / CV in the business administration system (SABU) in accordance with the provisions of Article 5 paragraph (1) Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 17 of 2018 concerning Registration of Limited Partnerships, Firms, and the Civil Union which previously was only regulated in the Trade Law Book. Type of research used in this article is normative legal research. The purpose of this article is to determine the mechanism and legal certainty in the registration of the Limited Partnership after the enactment of business administration system. The results of the research and writing of this article are that there is an overlap in the registration mechanism for the Limited Partnership based on these two rules, it can be concluded that due to the provisions in KUHD and Minister Regulation No. 17 of 2018 both are still valid, the principle of legal preference can be used, namely lex specialis derogat legi lex generalis, means that a more specific law can override a more general law. The advice that can be given is to conduct a study of the enactment of the Minister Regulation whether to follow or not the provisions in the Trade Law Books due to avoid conflicting norms in the registration of a limited partnership.
{"title":"Kepastian Hukum Pendaftaran Persekutuan Komanditer Pada Sistem Administrasi Badan Usaha","authors":"Dentria Cahya Sudarsa, I. W. Parsa","doi":"10.24843/AC.2020.V05.I03.P09","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2020.V05.I03.P09","url":null,"abstract":"The writing of this article is based on the issuance of new regulations regarding the establishment and registration of limited partnership / CV in the business administration system (SABU) in accordance with the provisions of Article 5 paragraph (1) Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 17 of 2018 concerning Registration of Limited Partnerships, Firms, and the Civil Union which previously was only regulated in the Trade Law Book. Type of research used in this article is normative legal research. The purpose of this article is to determine the mechanism and legal certainty in the registration of the Limited Partnership after the enactment of business administration system. The results of the research and writing of this article are that there is an overlap in the registration mechanism for the Limited Partnership based on these two rules, it can be concluded that due to the provisions in KUHD and Minister Regulation No. 17 of 2018 both are still valid, the principle of legal preference can be used, namely lex specialis derogat legi lex generalis, means that a more specific law can override a more general law. The advice that can be given is to conduct a study of the enactment of the Minister Regulation whether to follow or not the provisions in the Trade Law Books due to avoid conflicting norms in the registration of a limited partnership.","PeriodicalId":381646,"journal":{"name":"Acta Comitas","volume":"22 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114023308","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-08-07DOI: 10.24843/ac.2020.v05.i02.p02
Ni Putu Noving Paramitha Pandy, N. Astariyani
The purpose of this study is to find out and analyze the authority of a notary in making custody agreements on children, and to know and analyze the legal position of custody agreements on children, to court decisions related to divorce between the two biological parents of children. This type of research is normative research. The type of approach used is the statutory approach and conceptual approach. The legal material collection technique used is literature study. The results showed that the Notary has the authority to make authentic child custody agreements, and the authority of the Notary can have an impact on the divorce proceedings in the court running more efficiently in terms of child custody or the rights and obligations of parents after separation, because Notaries also play a role important as an intermediary and formulator of the desires of both parties (divorced couples). Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis mengenai kewenangan notaris dalam pembuatan perjanjian hak asuh atas anak, dan mengetahui serta menganalisis mengenai kedudukan hukum dari perjanjian hak asuh atas anak, terhadap putusan pengadilan terkait perceraian antara kedua orang tua biologis anak. Jenis Penelitian tergolong penelitian normatif. Jenis Pendekatan yang dipergunakan ialah pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum yang digunakan ialah studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Notaris memiliki kewenangan sebagai pembuat perjanjian hak asuh anak yang otentik, serta kewenang Notaris tersebut dapat memberikan dampak pada proses persidangan perceraian di pengadilan berjalan lebih efisien dalam hal hak asuk anak ataupun hak serta kewajiban orang tuanya setelah berpisah, karena Notaris juga berperan penting sebagai penengah dan perumus keinginan kedua belah pihak (pasangan yang telah bercerai).
本研究的目的是找出并分析公证人在制定子女监护权协议中的权威，并了解和分析子女监护权协议在涉及子女亲生父母双方离婚的法院判决中的法律地位。这种类型的研究是规范研究。所使用的方法类型是法定方法和概念方法。法律资料收集采用文献法。结果表明，公证人具有制定真实的儿童监护协议的权力，并且公证人的权威可以影响法院在儿童监护或分居后父母的权利和义务方面更有效地进行离婚诉讼，因为公证人还发挥着重要的中介作用和双方(离婚夫妇)愿望的制定者。Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui danmenganalis mengenai kewenangan noteris dalam penbuatan perjanjian hak asuh atas anak, danmengetahui serta menganalis mengenai keduukan hukum dari perjanjian hak asuh atas anak, terhadap putusan pengadilan terkait perceran antara kedua orang tu生物学家anak。Jenis Penelitian tergolong Penelitian normatim。Jenis Pendekatan yang dipergunakan ialah Pendekatan perundang-undangan dan Pendekatan konseptual。技术，彭普兰，巴汉，胡库姆，杨，迪古纳坎，研究，克普斯塔坎。Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa公证人是memiliki kewenang和sebagai在一起，serta kewenang公证人是terjanjian hahau anak yang otentik, serta kewenang公证人是terjanjian hahau anak和perjanjian, serta kewenang在一起，serta kewajiban orang tuanya setelah berpisah, karena公证人是juga berperan penbagai penengah和perumus keingan kedua belah pihak (pasangan yang telah berceri)。
{"title":"Kewenangan Notaris Dalam Perjanjian Hak Asuh Atas Anak Akibat Perceraian","authors":"Ni Putu Noving Paramitha Pandy, N. Astariyani","doi":"10.24843/ac.2020.v05.i02.p02","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24843/ac.2020.v05.i02.p02","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 \u0000 \u0000The purpose of this study is to find out and analyze the authority of a notary in making custody agreements on children, and to know and analyze the legal position of custody agreements on children, to court decisions related to divorce between the two biological parents of children. This type of research is normative research. The type of approach used is the statutory approach and conceptual approach. The legal material collection technique used is literature study. The results showed that the Notary has the authority to make authentic child custody agreements, and the authority of the Notary can have an impact on the divorce proceedings in the court running more efficiently in terms of child custody or the rights and obligations of parents after separation, because Notaries also play a role important as an intermediary and formulator of the desires of both parties (divorced couples). \u0000Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis mengenai kewenangan notaris dalam pembuatan perjanjian hak asuh atas anak, dan mengetahui serta menganalisis mengenai kedudukan hukum dari perjanjian hak asuh atas anak, terhadap putusan pengadilan terkait perceraian antara kedua orang tua biologis anak. Jenis Penelitian tergolong penelitian normatif. Jenis Pendekatan yang dipergunakan ialah pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum yang digunakan ialah studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Notaris memiliki kewenangan sebagai pembuat perjanjian hak asuh anak yang otentik, serta kewenang Notaris tersebut dapat memberikan dampak pada proses persidangan perceraian di pengadilan berjalan lebih efisien dalam hal hak asuk anak ataupun hak serta kewajiban orang tuanya setelah berpisah, karena Notaris juga berperan penting sebagai penengah dan perumus keinginan kedua belah pihak (pasangan yang telah bercerai). \u0000 \u0000 \u0000","PeriodicalId":381646,"journal":{"name":"Acta Comitas","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125581851","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-04-30DOI: 10.24843/ac.2020.v05.i01.p14
I. Made, Dwi Dimas Mahendrayana, Info Artikel, Penyelesaian Sengketa, Hak Cipta
A copyright violation occurs when someone makes an announcement or reproduction of a work without permission from the creator or copyright holder. If this happens, the creator or copyright holder can bring his dispute to be resolved through alternative dispute resolution or arbitration. However, the Law No. 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright does not regulate the mechanism for resolving copyright disputes through arbitration. The purpose of this study is to determine the mechanism for resolving disputes over copyright infringement through arbitration and the mechanism for canceling decisions on resolving disputes over copyright infringement through arbitration. This research uses normative legal research. From the results of the study, the initial stage of the mechanism of resolving disputes over copyright infringement through arbitration begins with the submission of the request for arbitration. Furthermore, the applicant makes a claim letter and proceed with the selection and appointment of the arbitrator. Then the arbitration examination. The final stage of the trial in arbitration is the submission of the award to the parties, and continued with the implementation of the arbitration award. An arbitration award can be requested to be canceled. The mechanism for cancellation of a national arbitration award begins by registering an arbitration award for cancellation at the Registrar's Office of the District Court. Then the court will examine the facts about whether or not the reasons stated by the applicant to cancel the arbitration award. If no, the application is rejected, but if the facts are found, the court is only authorized to cancel part of the arbitration award.
{"title":"MEKANISME PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PELANGGARAN HAK CIPTA MELALUI ARBITRASE","authors":"I. Made, Dwi Dimas Mahendrayana, Info Artikel, Penyelesaian Sengketa, Hak Cipta","doi":"10.24843/ac.2020.v05.i01.p14","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24843/ac.2020.v05.i01.p14","url":null,"abstract":"A copyright violation occurs when someone makes an announcement or reproduction of a work without permission from the creator or copyright holder. If this happens, the creator or copyright holder can bring his dispute to be resolved through alternative dispute resolution or arbitration. However, the Law No. 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright does not regulate the mechanism for resolving copyright disputes through arbitration. The purpose of this study is to determine the mechanism for resolving disputes over copyright infringement through arbitration and the mechanism for canceling decisions on resolving disputes over copyright infringement through arbitration. This research uses normative legal research. From the results of the study, the initial stage of the mechanism of resolving disputes over copyright infringement through arbitration begins with the submission of the request for arbitration. Furthermore, the applicant makes a claim letter and proceed with the selection and appointment of the arbitrator. Then the arbitration examination. The final stage of the trial in arbitration is the submission of the award to the parties, and continued with the implementation of the arbitration award. An arbitration award can be requested to be canceled. The mechanism for cancellation of a national arbitration award begins by registering an arbitration award for cancellation at the Registrar's Office of the District Court. Then the court will examine the facts about whether or not the reasons stated by the applicant to cancel the arbitration award. If no, the application is rejected, but if the facts are found, the court is only authorized to cancel part of the arbitration award.","PeriodicalId":381646,"journal":{"name":"Acta Comitas","volume":"114 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124058515","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-12-31DOI: 10.24843/ac.2019.v04.i03.p15
Putu Ratih Mahalia Septiana
The level of discipline and understanding of the rules and the low courtesy of traffic from road users is something that needs special attention in their efforts to solve problems in the field of traffic. The purpose of this study is as follows: to determine the legal consequences for perpetrators in traffic accidents whose victims have died and to find out legal considerations for perpetrators in criminal liability for traffic accidents. The type of research used is empirical juridical legal research. Results of the discussion in this study: The legal consequences for perpetrators in traffic accidents where the victim died was sentenced to a minimum prison sentence of 5 years. In accordance with Article 359 of the Criminal Code. Legal considerations for perpetrators in criminal liability for traffic accidents include unintentional elements (negligence), have never been convicted, there is peace between the parties, giving information is not convoluted, there are witnesses who are mitigating, then the threat of punishment can be lighter. Tingkat disiplin dan pemahaman terhadap peraturan dan sopan santun berlalu lintas yang rendah dari para pemakai jalan merupakan hal yang perlu mendapatkan perhatian khusus dalam upaya pemecahannya untuk mengatasi permasalahan di bidang lalu lintas. Tujuan dari penelitian ini sebagai berikut: untuk mengetahui akibat hukum bagi pelaku dalam kecelakaan lalu lintas yang korbannya meninggal dunia dan untuk mengetahui pertimbangan hukum bagi pelaku dalam pertanggung jawaban pidana terhadap kecelakaan lalu lintas. Jenis penelitian yang dipergunakan adalah penelitian hukum yuridis empiris. Hasil pembahasan dalam penelitian ini: Akibat hukum bagi pelaku dalam kecelakaan lalu lintas yang korbannya meninggal dunia dipidana dengan hukuman penjara minimal 5 tahun. Sesuai Pasal 359 KUHP. Pertimbangan hukum bagi pelaku dalam pertanggung jawaban pidana terhadap kecelakaan lalu lintas antara lain ada unsur ketidaksengajaan (alpa), belum pernah dihukum, ada perdamaian diantara para pihak, memberikan keterangan tidak berbelit-belit, adanya saksi yang meringankan, maka ancaman hukuman bisa lebih ringan.
在解决交通领域的问题时，需要特别注意道路使用者的纪律水平和对规则的理解以及交通的低礼貌。本研究的目的在于:确定被害人死亡的交通事故肇事者的法律后果，找出交通事故肇事者刑事责任的法律考量。所使用的研究类型是实证司法法律研究。本研究的讨论结果:肇事者在交通事故中受害人死亡的法律后果被判处最低5年有期徒刑。根据《刑法》第359条。交通事故肇事者刑事责任的法律考虑因素包括:非故意因素(疏忽)，从未被定罪，当事人之间和平，提供的信息不复杂，有减轻处罚的证人，那么处罚的威胁可以较轻。这句话的意思是:“我的女儿，我的女儿，我的女儿，我的女儿，我的女儿，我的女儿，我的女儿，我的女儿。”我是说，我是说我的女儿，我的女儿，我的女儿，我的女儿，我的女儿，我的女儿，我的女儿，我的女儿，我的女儿，我的女儿，我的女儿，我的女儿，我的女儿。论penelitian yang dipergunakan adalah penelitian hukum yuridis imperiis。【翻译】:Akibat hukum bagi pelaku dalam kecelakaan lalu lintas yang korbannya meninggal dunia dipidana dengan hukuman penjara minimal 5 tahun。Sesuai Pasal 359 KUHP。Pertimbangan hukum bagi pelaku dalam pertanggung jawaban pidana terhadap kecelakaan lalu lintas antara lain ada unsur ketidaksengajaan (alpa)， belum pernah dihukum, ada perdamaian diantara para pihak, memberikan keterangan tidak berbelit-belit, adanya saksi yang meringankan, maka ancaman hukuman bisa lebih ringan。
{"title":"Tanggung Jawab Pidana dalam Peristiwa Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas yang Korbanya Meninggal Dunia di Wilayah Hukum Resor Gianyar","authors":"Putu Ratih Mahalia Septiana","doi":"10.24843/ac.2019.v04.i03.p15","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24843/ac.2019.v04.i03.p15","url":null,"abstract":"The level of discipline and understanding of the rules and the low courtesy of traffic from road users is something that needs special attention in their efforts to solve problems in the field of traffic. The purpose of this study is as follows: to determine the legal consequences for perpetrators in traffic accidents whose victims have died and to find out legal considerations for perpetrators in criminal liability for traffic accidents. The type of research used is empirical juridical legal research. Results of the discussion in this study: The legal consequences for perpetrators in traffic accidents where the victim died was sentenced to a minimum prison sentence of 5 years. In accordance with Article 359 of the Criminal Code. Legal considerations for perpetrators in criminal liability for traffic accidents include unintentional elements (negligence), have never been convicted, there is peace between the parties, giving information is not convoluted, there are witnesses who are mitigating, then the threat of punishment can be lighter. \u0000Tingkat disiplin dan pemahaman terhadap peraturan dan sopan santun berlalu lintas yang rendah dari para pemakai jalan merupakan hal yang perlu mendapatkan perhatian khusus dalam upaya pemecahannya untuk mengatasi permasalahan di bidang lalu lintas. Tujuan dari penelitian ini sebagai berikut: untuk mengetahui akibat hukum bagi pelaku dalam kecelakaan lalu lintas yang korbannya meninggal dunia dan untuk mengetahui pertimbangan hukum bagi pelaku dalam pertanggung jawaban pidana terhadap kecelakaan lalu lintas. Jenis penelitian yang dipergunakan adalah penelitian hukum yuridis empiris. Hasil pembahasan dalam penelitian ini: Akibat hukum bagi pelaku dalam kecelakaan lalu lintas yang korbannya meninggal dunia dipidana dengan hukuman penjara minimal 5 tahun. Sesuai Pasal 359 KUHP. Pertimbangan hukum bagi pelaku dalam pertanggung jawaban pidana terhadap kecelakaan lalu lintas antara lain ada unsur ketidaksengajaan (alpa), belum pernah dihukum, ada perdamaian diantara para pihak, memberikan keterangan tidak berbelit-belit, adanya saksi yang meringankan, maka ancaman hukuman bisa lebih ringan.","PeriodicalId":381646,"journal":{"name":"Acta Comitas","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133398155","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：