首页 > 最新文献

New Review of Academic Librarianship最新文献

英文 中文
Factors Shaping Future Use and Design of Academic Library Space 影响高校图书馆空间未来使用与设计的因素
Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2022-02-07 DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2022.2039244
Andrew M. Cox
Abstract COVID is having immediate and long-term impacts on the use of libraries. But these changes will probably not alter the importance of the academic library as a space. In the decade pre COVID libraries saw a growing number of visits, despite the increasing availability of material digitally. The first part of the article offers an analysis of the factors driving this growth, such as changing pedagogies, diversification in the student body, new technologies plus tighter estates management. Barriers to change such as academic staff readiness, cost, and slow decision making are also presented. Then, the main body of the article discusses emerging factors which are likely to further shape the use of library space, namely: concerns with student well-being; sustainability; equality, diversity and inclusion, and colonization; increasing co-design with students; and new technologies. A final model captures the inter-related factors shaping use and design of library space post COVID.
COVID正在对图书馆的使用产生直接和长期的影响。但这些变化可能不会改变大学图书馆作为一个空间的重要性。在COVID - 19之前的十年里,图书馆的访问量不断增加,尽管数字材料的可用性越来越高。文章的第一部分分析了推动这一增长的因素,如教学方法的改变、学生群体的多样化、新技术以及更严格的物业管理。改变的障碍,如学术人员的准备,成本和缓慢的决策也提出。然后,文章的主体部分讨论了可能进一步影响图书馆空间使用的新因素,即:对学生福祉的关注;可持续性;平等、多样性和包容性以及殖民化;增加与学生的共同设计;还有新技术。最后一个模型捕捉了影响COVID后图书馆空间使用和设计的相互关联的因素。
{"title":"Factors Shaping Future Use and Design of Academic Library Space","authors":"Andrew M. Cox","doi":"10.1080/13614533.2022.2039244","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2022.2039244","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract COVID is having immediate and long-term impacts on the use of libraries. But these changes will probably not alter the importance of the academic library as a space. In the decade pre COVID libraries saw a growing number of visits, despite the increasing availability of material digitally. The first part of the article offers an analysis of the factors driving this growth, such as changing pedagogies, diversification in the student body, new technologies plus tighter estates management. Barriers to change such as academic staff readiness, cost, and slow decision making are also presented. Then, the main body of the article discusses emerging factors which are likely to further shape the use of library space, namely: concerns with student well-being; sustainability; equality, diversity and inclusion, and colonization; increasing co-design with students; and new technologies. A final model captures the inter-related factors shaping use and design of library space post COVID.","PeriodicalId":38971,"journal":{"name":"New Review of Academic Librarianship","volume":"29 1","pages":"33 - 50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43986796","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Academic Librarians and Their Role in Disseminating Accurate Knowledge and Information about the Gray Zone in Predatory Publishing 学术图书馆员及其在传播掠夺性出版灰色地带的准确知识和信息中的作用
Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2022-02-07 DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2022.2039242
J. A. Teixeira da Silva
Abstract “Predatory” publishing is a non-binary academic phenomenon, but personal and professional biases may influence the criteria used to create associated blacklists and whitelists. Academic librarians, as scholarly communicators, play an essential role in transmitting accurate information about “predatory” publishing to students, staff, funders, university management and the public. In this paper, lessons are drawn from the published literature to offer advice to academic librarians about the grey zone in predatory publishing to avoid select misinformation pitfalls. Academic librarians need to recognise the flaws and weaknesses of blacklists and of the criteria used to establish them. By offering accurate insight and advice, academic librarians can establish an effective online warning system to users about “predatory” publishing, allowing them to be more effective scholarly communicators, and not vessels of miscommunication. Academic librarians are essential in aiding the academic community to find solutions to this threat to the literature’s integrity.
摘要“掠夺性”出版是一种非二元学术现象,但个人和职业偏见可能会影响创建相关黑名单和白名单的标准。学术图书馆员作为学术传播者,在向学生、工作人员、资助者、大学管理层和公众传递有关“掠夺性”出版的准确信息方面发挥着至关重要的作用。本文从已发表的文献中吸取教训,就掠夺性出版中的灰色地带向学术图书馆员提供建议,以避免选择错误信息陷阱。学术图书馆员需要认识到黑名单的缺陷和弱点,以及建立黑名单的标准。通过提供准确的见解和建议,学术图书馆员可以向用户建立一个有效的关于“掠夺性”出版的在线警告系统,让他们成为更有效的学术传播者,而不是沟通错误的容器。学术图书馆员在帮助学术界找到解决文献完整性威胁的方法方面至关重要。
{"title":"Academic Librarians and Their Role in Disseminating Accurate Knowledge and Information about the Gray Zone in Predatory Publishing","authors":"J. A. Teixeira da Silva","doi":"10.1080/13614533.2022.2039242","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2022.2039242","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract “Predatory” publishing is a non-binary academic phenomenon, but personal and professional biases may influence the criteria used to create associated blacklists and whitelists. Academic librarians, as scholarly communicators, play an essential role in transmitting accurate information about “predatory” publishing to students, staff, funders, university management and the public. In this paper, lessons are drawn from the published literature to offer advice to academic librarians about the grey zone in predatory publishing to avoid select misinformation pitfalls. Academic librarians need to recognise the flaws and weaknesses of blacklists and of the criteria used to establish them. By offering accurate insight and advice, academic librarians can establish an effective online warning system to users about “predatory” publishing, allowing them to be more effective scholarly communicators, and not vessels of miscommunication. Academic librarians are essential in aiding the academic community to find solutions to this threat to the literature’s integrity.","PeriodicalId":38971,"journal":{"name":"New Review of Academic Librarianship","volume":"28 1","pages":"383 - 405"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42895162","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Trendspotting - Looking to the Future in a Post-Pandemic Academic Library Environment 趋势发现-在疫情后的高校图书馆环境中展望未来
Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2022.2058174
L. Appleton
In March 2020, the Covid-19 global pandemic meant that libraries had to respond and react quickly in order to adapt services as best they could. It is generally accepted that academic libraries, for the most part, were able to do this very effectively due to having already positioned themselves within a fully functioning digital environment (Appleton, 2021; Bullington et al., 2021; Falt & Das, 2020). Not wishing to speak too soon, but at my university campus, it feels as if we are starting to return to some sort of normality with Covid-19 restrictions being gradually lifted in the United Kingdom and indeed in other parts of the world. This has allowed me to start thinking about what this now means for the future of academic libraries. There has been plenty written about the post pandemic higher education environment and the ‘new-normal’ for academic libraries, and how some of the changes forced upon academic libraries during the pandemic (e.g., digital-first policies, online teaching, hybrid information environments, etc.) may actually be beneficial in the longer term, as well as being responses to the global Covid-19 outbreak (Appleton, 2020; Blake, 2020; Carlson, 2021; Cox, 2020). The 2021 special issue of New Review of Academic Librarianship focused on the acceleration of the digital shift in academic libraries, as a significant outcome from some of the changes that academic libraries had to make. Examples from that particular issue include case studies on the impact of the digital shift on library learning and instruction (Avon, Houston, Nunes, & Perkins, 2021), on digital content acquisition (Brine & Knight, 2021) and on student engagement (Matizirofa, Soyizwapi, Siwela, & Khosie, 2021). It is likely that some of the experiences we are having now will shape how academic libraries continue to develop in a post-pandemic world, and it would be interesting to see whether there are common trends emerging across geographic boundaries, as we move into a new era for academic libraries. Certainly, before the pandemic, academic libraries and their professional associations used environmental scanning techniques in order to spot trends across the sector, which in turn helped to inform strategy and development at local, national and international levels. The last set of top ten trends identified by the Association of College and Research Libraries Research Planning and Review Committee was published early in 2020, just before any Covid restrictions and library closures were enforced (ACRL, 2020). The ACRL top ten trends tend to be used as a barometer for many academic libraries with regard to highlighting the big issues of the day which need to be strategically addressed. SCONUL, in the United Kingdom also periodically commissions research into national academic library issues ( for example: Baker & Allden, 2017; Pinfield, Cox, & Rutter, 2017) in order to highlight trends and to aid strategic development. The latest example from SCONUL is a report publi
2020年3月,新冠肺炎全球大流行意味着图书馆必须迅速做出反应,以尽可能调整服务。人们普遍认为,学术图书馆在很大程度上能够非常有效地做到这一点,是因为它们已经将自己定位在一个功能齐全的数字环境中(Appleton,2021;Bullington等人,2021;Falt和Das,2020)。我不想过早发言,但在我的大学校园里,随着新冠肺炎限制在英国乃至世界其他地区逐渐解除,我们似乎开始恢复某种正常。这让我开始思考这对学术图书馆的未来意味着什么。关于疫情后的高等教育环境和学术图书馆的“新常态”,以及疫情期间迫使学术图书馆做出的一些改变(例如,数字优先政策、在线教学、混合信息环境等)在长期内实际上可能是有益的,已经有很多文章,以及应对全球新冠肺炎疫情(阿普尔顿,2020;布莱克,2020;卡尔森,2021;考克斯,2020)。《学术图书馆学新评论》2021年特刊聚焦于学术图书馆数字化转型的加速,这是学术图书馆必须做出的一些改变的重要成果。该特定问题的例子包括数字转型对图书馆学习和教学影响的案例研究(Avon,Houston,Nunes,&Perkins,2021)、数字内容获取(Brine&Knight,2021)和学生参与度(Matizirofa,Soyizwapi,Siwela,&Khosie,2021)。我们现在的一些经验很可能会影响学术图书馆在疫情后的世界中如何继续发展,随着我们进入学术图书馆的新时代,看看是否存在跨越地理界限的共同趋势会很有趣。当然,在疫情之前,学术图书馆及其专业协会使用环境扫描技术来发现整个行业的趋势,这反过来又有助于为地方、国家和国际层面的战略和发展提供信息。学院和研究图书馆协会研究规划和审查委员会确定的最后一组十大趋势于2020年初发布,就在任何新冠肺炎限制和图书馆关闭实施之前(ACRL,2020)。ACRL十大趋势往往被用作许多学术图书馆的晴雨表,以突出当今需要战略性解决的重大问题。英国SCONUL还定期委托对国家学术图书馆问题进行研究(例如:Baker和Allden,2017;Pinfield、Cox和Rutter,2017),以突出趋势并帮助战略发展。SCONUL的最新例子是2021年发布的一份关于学术图书馆物理使用趋势的报告,虽然该报告是作为其“封锁后的图书馆”工作的一部分发布的,但该研究主要在疫情之前进行(Cox&BensonMarshall,2021)。
{"title":"Trendspotting - Looking to the Future in a Post-Pandemic Academic Library Environment","authors":"L. Appleton","doi":"10.1080/13614533.2022.2058174","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2022.2058174","url":null,"abstract":"In March 2020, the Covid-19 global pandemic meant that libraries had to respond and react quickly in order to adapt services as best they could. It is generally accepted that academic libraries, for the most part, were able to do this very effectively due to having already positioned themselves within a fully functioning digital environment (Appleton, 2021; Bullington et al., 2021; Falt & Das, 2020). Not wishing to speak too soon, but at my university campus, it feels as if we are starting to return to some sort of normality with Covid-19 restrictions being gradually lifted in the United Kingdom and indeed in other parts of the world. This has allowed me to start thinking about what this now means for the future of academic libraries. There has been plenty written about the post pandemic higher education environment and the ‘new-normal’ for academic libraries, and how some of the changes forced upon academic libraries during the pandemic (e.g., digital-first policies, online teaching, hybrid information environments, etc.) may actually be beneficial in the longer term, as well as being responses to the global Covid-19 outbreak (Appleton, 2020; Blake, 2020; Carlson, 2021; Cox, 2020). The 2021 special issue of New Review of Academic Librarianship focused on the acceleration of the digital shift in academic libraries, as a significant outcome from some of the changes that academic libraries had to make. Examples from that particular issue include case studies on the impact of the digital shift on library learning and instruction (Avon, Houston, Nunes, & Perkins, 2021), on digital content acquisition (Brine & Knight, 2021) and on student engagement (Matizirofa, Soyizwapi, Siwela, & Khosie, 2021). It is likely that some of the experiences we are having now will shape how academic libraries continue to develop in a post-pandemic world, and it would be interesting to see whether there are common trends emerging across geographic boundaries, as we move into a new era for academic libraries. Certainly, before the pandemic, academic libraries and their professional associations used environmental scanning techniques in order to spot trends across the sector, which in turn helped to inform strategy and development at local, national and international levels. The last set of top ten trends identified by the Association of College and Research Libraries Research Planning and Review Committee was published early in 2020, just before any Covid restrictions and library closures were enforced (ACRL, 2020). The ACRL top ten trends tend to be used as a barometer for many academic libraries with regard to highlighting the big issues of the day which need to be strategically addressed. SCONUL, in the United Kingdom also periodically commissions research into national academic library issues ( for example: Baker & Allden, 2017; Pinfield, Cox, & Rutter, 2017) in order to highlight trends and to aid strategic development. The latest example from SCONUL is a report publi","PeriodicalId":38971,"journal":{"name":"New Review of Academic Librarianship","volume":"28 1","pages":"1 - 6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43059967","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Faculty Perceptions of an OER Stipend Program 教师对OER津贴计划的看法
Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2021-11-03 DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2021.2000452
Christopher V. Hollister, Joseph D. Patton
Abstract This study recounts the experimental implementation of a stipend program to incentivize and reward instructor use of open educational resources (OERs). The authors leveraged a statewide initiative to develop an award system based on specific criteria, and 24 instructors qualified. The authors surveyed awardees to explore their perceptions of using OERs and the utility of incentivizing that practice. All survey participants reported that the use of OERs had a highly or moderately positive impact on student learning and engagement. The majority of participants indicated curricular needs and textbook costs as the primary motivations for originally creating or adopting OERs; only one-third qualified the stipend program as either highly or moderately incentivizing. Participants also reported how they used their stipends, the challenges to OER adoption, and their recommendations for how to incentivize the practice. The authors discuss the implications for OER stipend programs generally, and they propose future research directions.
摘要本研究叙述了一项津贴计划的实验实施,以激励和奖励教师使用开放教育资源。作者利用一项全州范围的倡议,开发了一个基于特定标准的奖励系统,24名教师获得了资格。作者调查了获奖者,探讨他们对使用OERs的看法以及激励这种做法的效用。所有调查参与者都报告说,使用OERs对学生的学习和参与有高度或中度的积极影响。大多数参与者表示最初创建或采用开放式教育课程的主要动机是课程需求和教科书成本;只有三分之一的人认为津贴计划具有高度或适度的激励作用。参与者还报告了他们如何使用他们的津贴,OER采用的挑战,以及他们对如何激励实践的建议。作者从总体上讨论了OER津贴计划的影响,并提出了未来的研究方向。
{"title":"Faculty Perceptions of an OER Stipend Program","authors":"Christopher V. Hollister, Joseph D. Patton","doi":"10.1080/13614533.2021.2000452","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2021.2000452","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study recounts the experimental implementation of a stipend program to incentivize and reward instructor use of open educational resources (OERs). The authors leveraged a statewide initiative to develop an award system based on specific criteria, and 24 instructors qualified. The authors surveyed awardees to explore their perceptions of using OERs and the utility of incentivizing that practice. All survey participants reported that the use of OERs had a highly or moderately positive impact on student learning and engagement. The majority of participants indicated curricular needs and textbook costs as the primary motivations for originally creating or adopting OERs; only one-third qualified the stipend program as either highly or moderately incentivizing. Participants also reported how they used their stipends, the challenges to OER adoption, and their recommendations for how to incentivize the practice. The authors discuss the implications for OER stipend programs generally, and they propose future research directions.","PeriodicalId":38971,"journal":{"name":"New Review of Academic Librarianship","volume":"28 1","pages":"435 - 453"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42465855","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Understanding the Value of Digital Archival Collections to Faculty at Maynooth University Library 了解数字档案收藏对马约大学图书馆教职员工的价值
Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2021-10-02 DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2021.1976233
Hugh Murphy
Abstract This article first defines what constitutes a “Special Collection” and what constitutes a “digital archival collection”. Some background on the evolution of surrogate primary sources, from microfilm, through online databases to Open Access resources is presented. The article then explores the literature relating to the management and use of Digital Archival Collections and other digital primary sources. Some contextual information on Maynooth University and our digital primary sources is given. The article goes on to report on a consultation with faculty members who offer their insights on using DACs. The findings of the consultation process, which broadly show a strong appreciation of the merits of these resources, but mainly as an enhanced surrogate are discussed. The article concludes with some considerations of what these findings mean for collection development and what needs to be done to further stimulate engagement with these resources in Maynooth University.
摘要本文首先界定了什么是“专题馆藏”,什么是“数字档案馆藏”。本文介绍了从微电影到在线数据库再到开放获取资源等替代原始资源演变的一些背景。然后,本文探讨了与数字档案馆藏和其他数字原始资源的管理和使用有关的文献。给出了梅努斯大学的一些背景信息和我们的数字主要资源。这篇文章继续报道了与教师的咨询,他们提供了他们对使用dac的见解。讨论了协商过程的结果,这些结果大体上表明对这些资源的优点有强烈的认识,但主要是作为一种加强的替代办法。文章最后考虑了这些发现对馆藏发展的意义,以及需要做些什么来进一步促进梅努斯大学对这些资源的利用。
{"title":"Understanding the Value of Digital Archival Collections to Faculty at Maynooth University Library","authors":"Hugh Murphy","doi":"10.1080/13614533.2021.1976233","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2021.1976233","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article first defines what constitutes a “Special Collection” and what constitutes a “digital archival collection”. Some background on the evolution of surrogate primary sources, from microfilm, through online databases to Open Access resources is presented. The article then explores the literature relating to the management and use of Digital Archival Collections and other digital primary sources. Some contextual information on Maynooth University and our digital primary sources is given. The article goes on to report on a consultation with faculty members who offer their insights on using DACs. The findings of the consultation process, which broadly show a strong appreciation of the merits of these resources, but mainly as an enhanced surrogate are discussed. The article concludes with some considerations of what these findings mean for collection development and what needs to be done to further stimulate engagement with these resources in Maynooth University.","PeriodicalId":38971,"journal":{"name":"New Review of Academic Librarianship","volume":"27 1","pages":"423 - 439"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44171909","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What is the True State and Status of Academic Librarianship in the UK? 英国学术图书馆事业的真实状态和地位是什么?
Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2021-10-02 DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2021.2008995
T. Wales
{"title":"What is the True State and Status of Academic Librarianship in the UK?","authors":"T. Wales","doi":"10.1080/13614533.2021.2008995","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2021.2008995","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":38971,"journal":{"name":"New Review of Academic Librarianship","volume":"27 1","pages":"397 - 401"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47107884","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Perceptions and Practices of Scholarly Self-Publishing among Nigerian Librarians: Implications for Scholarly Communication 尼日利亚图书馆员的学术自我出版认知与实践:对学术交流的启示
Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2021-09-08 DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2021.1964548
I. Adeyemi, K. Sulaiman
Abstract The study examined perceptions and practices of self-publishing among Nigerian librarians and its implications for scholarly communication. The study adopts sequential exploratory strategy of mixed methods research design. Interview and web-based questionnaire were used to collect data for the study. Twelve (12) participants were interviewed and 149 responses were collected using Web-questionnaire. It was found that scholarly self-publishing will increase the volume of literature but would have a negative effect on the standard of scholarly communication. It was found that scholarly self-publishing will increase poor quality in scholarly works and promote elements of bias. Findings show that issues of verifiability and reliability of scholarly self-published authors will be a concern in scholarly communication. It was shown that there is no statistically significant relationship between perceptions and practices of scholarly self-publishing. It was concluded that scholarly self-publishing will negatively affect the quality of scholarly communication but will promote open access initiatives.
摘要本研究考察了尼日利亚图书馆员对自我出版的看法和实践,以及其对学术交流的影响。本研究采用混合方法研究设计的顺序探索策略。访谈和基于网络的问卷调查用于收集研究数据。对十二(12)名参与者进行了访谈,并使用网络问卷收集了149份回复。研究发现,学术自出版会增加文献量,但会对学术交流的标准产生负面影响。研究发现,学术自出版会增加学术作品的质量,并助长偏见。研究结果表明,学术自发表作者的可验证性和可靠性问题将是学术交流中关注的问题。研究表明,学术自我出版的观念和实践之间没有统计学上的显著关系。研究得出的结论是,学术自主出版将对学术交流的质量产生负面影响,但将促进开放获取举措。
{"title":"Perceptions and Practices of Scholarly Self-Publishing among Nigerian Librarians: Implications for Scholarly Communication","authors":"I. Adeyemi, K. Sulaiman","doi":"10.1080/13614533.2021.1964548","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2021.1964548","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The study examined perceptions and practices of self-publishing among Nigerian librarians and its implications for scholarly communication. The study adopts sequential exploratory strategy of mixed methods research design. Interview and web-based questionnaire were used to collect data for the study. Twelve (12) participants were interviewed and 149 responses were collected using Web-questionnaire. It was found that scholarly self-publishing will increase the volume of literature but would have a negative effect on the standard of scholarly communication. It was found that scholarly self-publishing will increase poor quality in scholarly works and promote elements of bias. Findings show that issues of verifiability and reliability of scholarly self-published authors will be a concern in scholarly communication. It was shown that there is no statistically significant relationship between perceptions and practices of scholarly self-publishing. It was concluded that scholarly self-publishing will negatively affect the quality of scholarly communication but will promote open access initiatives.","PeriodicalId":38971,"journal":{"name":"New Review of Academic Librarianship","volume":"28 1","pages":"366 - 382"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48089932","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Study on the Risk of Prosecution and Perceived Proximity on State University Undergraduates' Behavioural Intention for e-Book Piracy 州立大学大学生盗版电子书行为意向的起诉风险和感知接近性研究
Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2021-09-06 DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2021.1976655
C. Jayasundara
Abstract This research generated a theoretical model based on a combination of deterrence and reasoned action theories to explore the prosecution risk and the perceived proximity on e-book piracy. Four hypotheses were developed through the literature to analyse the undergraduate intention to plunder e-books. The self-reporting method via snowball sampling was employed to collect the data from 88 undergraduates who had previously committed e-book piracy. The results indicated that perceived proximity and prosecution risk have a significant relationship to piracy intention (F = 113.805, p < 0.001). Seventy-two per cent of the piracy intention variance was accounted for by the predictors, as reported by the adjusted R2 (0.722). Although the severity of the punishment has been identified as an important factor in lowering piracy intentions, it has not been particularly seen among the female participants, i.e., the more female undergraduates knew about the severity of the punishment, the more they wanted to engage in piracy.
摘要本研究基于威慑理论与理性行为理论相结合的理论模型,探讨电子书盗版的起诉风险与感知接近性。通过文献分析,提出了四个假设来分析大学生对电子书的掠夺意图。采用滚雪球抽样的自我报告法,对88名曾经有过电子书盗版行为的大学生进行数据收集。结果表明,感知接近度和起诉风险与盗版意图有显著关系(F = 113.805, p < 0.001)。根据调整后的R2(0.722),预测因子解释了72%的盗版意图差异。虽然惩罚的严厉程度被认为是降低盗版意图的重要因素,但在女性参与者中并没有特别的发现,即女性大学生对惩罚的严厉程度了解得越多,她们就越想从事盗版活动。
{"title":"A Study on the Risk of Prosecution and Perceived Proximity on State University Undergraduates' Behavioural Intention for e-Book Piracy","authors":"C. Jayasundara","doi":"10.1080/13614533.2021.1976655","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2021.1976655","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This research generated a theoretical model based on a combination of deterrence and reasoned action theories to explore the prosecution risk and the perceived proximity on e-book piracy. Four hypotheses were developed through the literature to analyse the undergraduate intention to plunder e-books. The self-reporting method via snowball sampling was employed to collect the data from 88 undergraduates who had previously committed e-book piracy. The results indicated that perceived proximity and prosecution risk have a significant relationship to piracy intention (F = 113.805, p < 0.001). Seventy-two per cent of the piracy intention variance was accounted for by the predictors, as reported by the adjusted R2 (0.722). Although the severity of the punishment has been identified as an important factor in lowering piracy intentions, it has not been particularly seen among the female participants, i.e., the more female undergraduates knew about the severity of the punishment, the more they wanted to engage in piracy.","PeriodicalId":38971,"journal":{"name":"New Review of Academic Librarianship","volume":"28 1","pages":"406 - 434"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44969978","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Research Data Management (RDM) and the Evolving Identity of Academic Libraries and Librarians: A Literature Review 研究数据管理(RDM)与高校图书馆和馆员身份的演变——文献综述
Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2021-08-25 DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2021.1964549
A. Andrikopoulou, J. Rowley, G. Walton
Abstract Academic libraries and their staff are increasingly involved in the Research Data Management (RDM) practices and processes in their universities. This article explores the impact that such initiatives have on the image and identity of academic libraries. This paper proposes that involvement in and leadership of RDM university practices has the potential to re-shape the library’s role, image, and identity within the university, and going forward, to contribute to the library’s continuing relevance to research communities. It also points to the need to develop librarians’ skills and competencies in RDM, and reflects on the dynamics associated with collaboration and competition in RDM. The article concludes with an agenda for future research.
摘要高校图书馆及其工作人员越来越多地参与到大学的研究数据管理(RDM)实践和过程中。本文探讨了这些举措对高校图书馆形象和身份的影响。本文提出,参与和领导RDM大学实践有可能重塑图书馆在大学中的角色、形象和身份,并有助于图书馆与研究社区的持续相关性。它还指出了发展图书馆员RDM技能和能力的必要性,并反思了RDM中与合作和竞争相关的动态。文章最后提出了未来研究的议程。
{"title":"Research Data Management (RDM) and the Evolving Identity of Academic Libraries and Librarians: A Literature Review","authors":"A. Andrikopoulou, J. Rowley, G. Walton","doi":"10.1080/13614533.2021.1964549","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2021.1964549","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Academic libraries and their staff are increasingly involved in the Research Data Management (RDM) practices and processes in their universities. This article explores the impact that such initiatives have on the image and identity of academic libraries. This paper proposes that involvement in and leadership of RDM university practices has the potential to re-shape the library’s role, image, and identity within the university, and going forward, to contribute to the library’s continuing relevance to research communities. It also points to the need to develop librarians’ skills and competencies in RDM, and reflects on the dynamics associated with collaboration and competition in RDM. The article concludes with an agenda for future research.","PeriodicalId":38971,"journal":{"name":"New Review of Academic Librarianship","volume":"28 1","pages":"349 - 365"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47126408","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
The Current Status of Information Literacy Instruction in University Libraries of Pakistan 巴基斯坦大学图书馆信息素质教育现状
Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2021-08-25 DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2021.1964547
Sohail Iqal, Haroon Idrees
Abstract The purpose of this study was to explore the current practices of information literacy instruction in the libraries of universities in Pakistan. The research method consisted of a quantitative approach using a structured questionnaire for empirical data collection, which was sent to the universities and degree awarding institutions recognised by the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan. The collected data was analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences software (SPSS version-24). Both the descriptive (frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation) and inferential (Kruskal-Wallis, and Mann-Whitney U statistic) testing were applied for analysing the data. The findings of the study show that 63% of the responding university libraries offer information literacy (IL) education mostly to new students and this ranges from basic to advanced skills. Face-to-face delivery is the most popular IL delivery method. The IL instruction appears to take place in library training rooms. The outcome of this study will help the Library and Information Sciences (LIS) schools, library associations, and universities comprehend the present status of information literacy instructions in the libraries of Pakistani universities.
摘要本研究旨在探讨巴基斯坦高校图书馆信息素养教学的现状。研究方法包括使用结构化问卷收集实证数据的定量方法,该问卷被发送给巴基斯坦高等教育委员会认可的大学和学位授予机构。收集的数据使用社会科学统计软件包软件(SPSS version-24)进行分析。采用描述性检验(频率、百分比、平均值、标准差)和推断性检验(Kruskal-Wallis和Mann-Whitney U统计)对数据进行分析。研究结果表明,63%的受访大学图书馆主要向新生提供信息素养(IL)教育,范围从基本技能到高级技能不等。面对面交流是最流行的IL交流方式。IL教学似乎是在图书馆的培训室里进行的。本研究的结果将有助于图书馆与信息科学(LIS)学校、图书馆协会和大学了解巴基斯坦大学图书馆信息素养指导的现状。
{"title":"The Current Status of Information Literacy Instruction in University Libraries of Pakistan","authors":"Sohail Iqal, Haroon Idrees","doi":"10.1080/13614533.2021.1964547","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2021.1964547","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The purpose of this study was to explore the current practices of information literacy instruction in the libraries of universities in Pakistan. The research method consisted of a quantitative approach using a structured questionnaire for empirical data collection, which was sent to the universities and degree awarding institutions recognised by the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan. The collected data was analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences software (SPSS version-24). Both the descriptive (frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation) and inferential (Kruskal-Wallis, and Mann-Whitney U statistic) testing were applied for analysing the data. The findings of the study show that 63% of the responding university libraries offer information literacy (IL) education mostly to new students and this ranges from basic to advanced skills. Face-to-face delivery is the most popular IL delivery method. The IL instruction appears to take place in library training rooms. The outcome of this study will help the Library and Information Sciences (LIS) schools, library associations, and universities comprehend the present status of information literacy instructions in the libraries of Pakistani universities.","PeriodicalId":38971,"journal":{"name":"New Review of Academic Librarianship","volume":"28 1","pages":"303 - 320"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47434239","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
期刊
New Review of Academic Librarianship
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1