首页 > 最新文献

Prague Journal of English Studies最新文献

英文 中文
When “We Believe that ...”: The Role of Collective “we” in the Dialogic Negotiation in Hard News Discourse 当“我们相信……”:集体“我们”在硬新闻话语对话谈判中的作用
Pub Date : 2020-07-01 DOI: 10.2478/pjes-2020-0008
Zuzana Nádraská
Abstract The present paper examines the occurrence of collective self expressed by the first person plural “we” in British broadsheet hard news reports. Given that “we” typically embraces “I” and the “non-I”, and is viewed in contradistinction to “others”, it is subjective and dialogic (inter-subjective) in nature (Baumgarten et al.; Benveniste). This study, grounded in Systemic Functional Linguistics and the theory of engagement, examines the coupling, i.e., co-occurrence, of one dialogic signal “we” with other dialogic meanings (entertain, proclaim and disclaim) used for the dialogic negotiation of content and writer-reader engagement (Martin, “Beyond Exchange”; Martin and White). Couplings are interpreted from the point of view of the overall rhetorical strategy they are put to, referred to as syndromes of meaning (Zappavigna et al., “Syndromes”; Zappavigna et al., “The Coupling”). The rhetorical functions of syndromes reflect the basic dialogic meanings of the examined engagement categories such as a tentative suggestion of an opinion (entertain), a strong statement of an opinion (proclaim) and a rejection of a dispreferred opinion (disclaim). Finer variations within the individual rhetorical strategies are related to the difference in the source of dialogic positioning (an individual versus collective voice) and the referential scope of the pronoun (a precisely defined reference versus reference with a more general and diffused scope).
摘要本文考察了英国大报硬新闻报道中第一人称复数“我们”所表达的集体自我的出现情况。鉴于“我们”通常包含“我”和“非我”,并被视为与“他者”的对比,它本质上是主观的和对话的(主体间)(Baumgarten等人;Benveniste)。本研究以系统功能语言学和参与理论为基础,研究了一个对话信号“我们”与其他对话意义(娱乐、宣告和否认)的耦合,即共现,用于内容和作者-读者参与的对话协商(Martin,“Beyond Exchange”;马丁和怀特)。从它们所处的整体修辞策略的角度来解释耦合,称为意义综合症(Zappavigna等人,“综合症”;Zappavigna等人,“耦合”)。综合症的修辞功能反映了所研究的接触类别的基本对话意义,如试探性的意见建议(娱乐),强烈的意见陈述(宣布)和拒绝不喜欢的意见(否认)。个体修辞策略中的细微变化与对话定位的来源(个人声音与集体声音)和代词的指称范围(精确定义的指称与更广泛和扩散的指称)的差异有关。
{"title":"When “We Believe that ...”: The Role of Collective “we” in the Dialogic Negotiation in Hard News Discourse","authors":"Zuzana Nádraská","doi":"10.2478/pjes-2020-0008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2478/pjes-2020-0008","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The present paper examines the occurrence of collective self expressed by the first person plural “we” in British broadsheet hard news reports. Given that “we” typically embraces “I” and the “non-I”, and is viewed in contradistinction to “others”, it is subjective and dialogic (inter-subjective) in nature (Baumgarten et al.; Benveniste). This study, grounded in Systemic Functional Linguistics and the theory of engagement, examines the coupling, i.e., co-occurrence, of one dialogic signal “we” with other dialogic meanings (entertain, proclaim and disclaim) used for the dialogic negotiation of content and writer-reader engagement (Martin, “Beyond Exchange”; Martin and White). Couplings are interpreted from the point of view of the overall rhetorical strategy they are put to, referred to as syndromes of meaning (Zappavigna et al., “Syndromes”; Zappavigna et al., “The Coupling”). The rhetorical functions of syndromes reflect the basic dialogic meanings of the examined engagement categories such as a tentative suggestion of an opinion (entertain), a strong statement of an opinion (proclaim) and a rejection of a dispreferred opinion (disclaim). Finer variations within the individual rhetorical strategies are related to the difference in the source of dialogic positioning (an individual versus collective voice) and the referential scope of the pronoun (a precisely defined reference versus reference with a more general and diffused scope).","PeriodicalId":402791,"journal":{"name":"Prague Journal of English Studies","volume":"454 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125791448","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Rebekah Hyneman’s Leaves of the Upas Tree: A Tale of (In)temperance and (Im)morality 丽贝卡·海曼的《Upas Tree: In)temperance and (In) morality》
Pub Date : 2020-07-01 DOI: 10.2478/pjes-2020-0003
Irina Rabinovich
Abstract The intent of this paper is to examine the use, by nineteenth-century American authors, of the temperance novel, a popular literary sub-genre in antebellum America, as a literary means for presenting the widespread controversy in the nation as regards the achievements of temperance societies. Moreover, my goal is to show that the popularity of temperance novels, in spite of their didactic and moralistic nature, displays the public’s readiness to consume temperance literature, thus reciprocating the attempt of writers to promote social ideals and heal social ills. Finally, since Rebekah Hyneman, a convert to Judaism, is the only Jewish-American writer who wrote a temperance novel, and is one among a small number of female writers who used this genre, it is interesting to examine if and how her double “Otherness” (being a Jew and a female novelist) distinguishes her from her literary Christian male and/or female counterparts. Hyneman’s novel Leaves of the Upas Tree: A Story for Every Household (1854–55) serves as a case in point of a temperance novel that demonstrates how a dysfunctional American family operates as a microcosm and how temperance and other charitable societies fail to cope with individuals’ tribulations. More importantly, the novel aims to attest that a familial defective unit, affected by excessive drinking, breeds a ruthless societal macrocosm, lacking compassion, empathy, and social and communal support. The merciless, xenophobic and anti-Semitic community depicted in the novel serves as a prism through which the author presents much more acute plagues afflicting America.
摘要本文的目的是研究19世纪美国作家对禁酒小说的使用,禁酒小说是美国内战前流行的文学亚体裁,作为一种文学手段来表达美国关于禁酒社会成就的广泛争议。此外,我的目的是要表明,尽管禁酒小说具有说教和道德的性质,但它的流行表明公众愿意消费禁酒文学,从而回报作家促进社会理想和治愈社会弊病的尝试。最后,由于皈依犹太教的丽贝卡·海曼(Rebekah Hyneman)是唯一一位写过禁酒小说的犹太裔美国作家,也是少数使用这一类型的女性作家之一,因此,研究她的双重“他者性”(既是犹太人又是女性小说家)是否以及如何将她与文学上的基督教男性和/或女性同行区分开来,是很有趣的。海曼的小说《乌帕斯树的叶子:每个家庭的故事》(1854 - 1855)就是一个典型的禁酒小说,它展示了一个不正常的美国家庭是如何作为一个缩影运作的,以及禁酒和其他慈善团体是如何无法应对个人苦难的。更重要的是,这部小说的目的是证明,一个有缺陷的家庭,受到过度饮酒的影响,滋生了一个无情的社会宏观,缺乏同情心,同理心,以及社会和社区的支持。小说中描绘的无情、仇外和反犹太的社区是一个棱镜,作者通过这个棱镜呈现了困扰美国的更严重的瘟疫。
{"title":"Rebekah Hyneman’s Leaves of the Upas Tree: A Tale of (In)temperance and (Im)morality","authors":"Irina Rabinovich","doi":"10.2478/pjes-2020-0003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2478/pjes-2020-0003","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The intent of this paper is to examine the use, by nineteenth-century American authors, of the temperance novel, a popular literary sub-genre in antebellum America, as a literary means for presenting the widespread controversy in the nation as regards the achievements of temperance societies. Moreover, my goal is to show that the popularity of temperance novels, in spite of their didactic and moralistic nature, displays the public’s readiness to consume temperance literature, thus reciprocating the attempt of writers to promote social ideals and heal social ills. Finally, since Rebekah Hyneman, a convert to Judaism, is the only Jewish-American writer who wrote a temperance novel, and is one among a small number of female writers who used this genre, it is interesting to examine if and how her double “Otherness” (being a Jew and a female novelist) distinguishes her from her literary Christian male and/or female counterparts. Hyneman’s novel Leaves of the Upas Tree: A Story for Every Household (1854–55) serves as a case in point of a temperance novel that demonstrates how a dysfunctional American family operates as a microcosm and how temperance and other charitable societies fail to cope with individuals’ tribulations. More importantly, the novel aims to attest that a familial defective unit, affected by excessive drinking, breeds a ruthless societal macrocosm, lacking compassion, empathy, and social and communal support. The merciless, xenophobic and anti-Semitic community depicted in the novel serves as a prism through which the author presents much more acute plagues afflicting America.","PeriodicalId":402791,"journal":{"name":"Prague Journal of English Studies","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127806960","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
On Writer’s Block: The Reflection of Lacanian Post-Structuralist Psychoanalysis in Paul Auster’s Oracle Night 作家的障碍:拉康后结构主义精神分析在保罗·奥斯特的《神谕之夜》中的反映
Pub Date : 2019-07-01 DOI: 10.2478/pjes-2019-0008
Maroš Buday
Abstract This paper deals with the reflection of Lacanian post-structuralist psychoanalysis in Paul Auster’s novel Oracle Night, with respect to the phenomenon of writer’s block. The paper argues that Auster’s novel is remarkably synchronized with the theoretical perspectives proposed by the noted psychoanalyst, Jacques Lacan, as the root of his protagonist’s inability to write is linked to the medium of written discourse, and the obstacles which the protagonist of his story faces are thus put within the confines of the protagonist’s psyche. Writer’s block is thus being examined with respect to the Lacanian concept known as the chain of signification, as it is much more noticeable in writers because their primary conduit for describing the exterior and interior world is discourse in its written form. Auster exceptionally mirrors Lacan’s view of a writer’s psyche and vividly explores the foundation of the inability to write with respect to the symbolic realm of human experience.
摘要:本文从作家受阻现象的角度探讨拉康后结构主义精神分析在保罗·奥斯特小说《神谕之夜》中的反映。本文认为,奥斯特的小说与著名精神分析学家雅克·拉康提出的理论观点非常一致,因为他的主人公无法写作的根源与书面话语的媒介有关,因此他的故事主人公所面临的障碍被置于主人公的心理范围内。因此,作家的障碍被考察与拉康的概念有关,被称为意义链,因为它在作家身上更明显,因为他们描述外部和内部世界的主要渠道是书面形式的话语。奥斯特独特地反映了拉康对作家心理的看法,并生动地探讨了人类经验的象征领域无法写作的基础。
{"title":"On Writer’s Block: The Reflection of Lacanian Post-Structuralist Psychoanalysis in Paul Auster’s Oracle Night","authors":"Maroš Buday","doi":"10.2478/pjes-2019-0008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2478/pjes-2019-0008","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper deals with the reflection of Lacanian post-structuralist psychoanalysis in Paul Auster’s novel Oracle Night, with respect to the phenomenon of writer’s block. The paper argues that Auster’s novel is remarkably synchronized with the theoretical perspectives proposed by the noted psychoanalyst, Jacques Lacan, as the root of his protagonist’s inability to write is linked to the medium of written discourse, and the obstacles which the protagonist of his story faces are thus put within the confines of the protagonist’s psyche. Writer’s block is thus being examined with respect to the Lacanian concept known as the chain of signification, as it is much more noticeable in writers because their primary conduit for describing the exterior and interior world is discourse in its written form. Auster exceptionally mirrors Lacan’s view of a writer’s psyche and vividly explores the foundation of the inability to write with respect to the symbolic realm of human experience.","PeriodicalId":402791,"journal":{"name":"Prague Journal of English Studies","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130605627","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Alienation and Character Typology in African American and Native American Narratives: A Jungian Reading of The Bluest Eye and Winter in the Blood 非裔美国人和印第安人叙事中的异化与人物类型学:《最蓝的眼睛》和《血中的冬天》的荣格解读
Pub Date : 2019-07-01 DOI: 10.2478/pjes-2019-0004
Issa Omotosho Garuba
Abstract Alienation is a recurring literary subject in the United States. Its peculiarity is occasioned by the phenomenon of racial segregation, among others, with which the society is characterized. Thus, considerable critical attention has been given to the causes as well as the attendant socio-political, economic and psychological imports on the victims. From a psychological perspective, specifically, this paper engages in a comparative analysis of the effects of alienation on characters of African American and Native American origins produced by the same system in two novels which have African American and Native American roots – Toni Morrison’s The Bluest Eye and James Welch’s Winter in the Blood, respectively. In order to understand the variance and/or convergence in the personality formations of the African American and Native American characters in the narratives, consequent upon the racially alienating system, the paper adopts Carl Jung’s psychological theory of personality typology, labelled introversion and extraversion, with a view to assessing how, typically, persons of these origins are more likely to react to the socio-political, cultural and economic situations affecting them as minority ethnic groups in the United States.
异化是美国文学中一个反复出现的主题。它的特殊性是由种族隔离现象引起的,除其他外,这是社会的特征。因此,对其原因以及随之而来的对受害者的社会政治、经济和心理影响给予了相当重要的注意。本文特别从心理学的角度,比较分析了托妮·莫里森的《最蓝的眼睛》和詹姆斯·韦尔奇的《血中的冬天》这两部具有非裔和印第安血统的小说中,在同一制度下产生的异化对非裔和印第安血统人物的影响。为了理解非裔美国人和印第安人在叙事中性格形成的差异和/或趋同,由于种族异化制度,本文采用了卡尔·荣格的人格类型学心理学理论,标记为内向和外向,以评估这些出身的人通常如何更有可能对社会政治,影响他们作为美国少数民族的文化和经济状况。
{"title":"Alienation and Character Typology in African American and Native American Narratives: A Jungian Reading of The Bluest Eye and Winter in the Blood","authors":"Issa Omotosho Garuba","doi":"10.2478/pjes-2019-0004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2478/pjes-2019-0004","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Alienation is a recurring literary subject in the United States. Its peculiarity is occasioned by the phenomenon of racial segregation, among others, with which the society is characterized. Thus, considerable critical attention has been given to the causes as well as the attendant socio-political, economic and psychological imports on the victims. From a psychological perspective, specifically, this paper engages in a comparative analysis of the effects of alienation on characters of African American and Native American origins produced by the same system in two novels which have African American and Native American roots – Toni Morrison’s The Bluest Eye and James Welch’s Winter in the Blood, respectively. In order to understand the variance and/or convergence in the personality formations of the African American and Native American characters in the narratives, consequent upon the racially alienating system, the paper adopts Carl Jung’s psychological theory of personality typology, labelled introversion and extraversion, with a view to assessing how, typically, persons of these origins are more likely to react to the socio-political, cultural and economic situations affecting them as minority ethnic groups in the United States.","PeriodicalId":402791,"journal":{"name":"Prague Journal of English Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131128908","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
A Shadow of Truth: Honor Klein in Iris Murdoch’s A Severed Head 真相的阴影:爱瑞丝·默多克《斩首》中的荣耀·克莱因
Pub Date : 2019-07-01 DOI: 10.2478/pjes-2019-0002
Barbora Kašpárková
Abstract Iris Murdoch’s novel A Severed Head (1961) is an example of convoluted relationships that may appear hilarious upon superficial analysis. A close reading, however, reveals the suffering triggered by the behaviour of the central characters. The most mysterious female protagonist, the sexually ambivalent Honor Klein, deploys a wide range of possible interpretations. Honor’s powerful figure is like an axis around which the rest of the characters rotate and without whom the plot would fall apart. The question is, nonetheless, if she is a real figure or not. This paper argues that this pivotal character is not a real person but a dreamy and ghostly concentration of elements in relation to the protagonist Martin Lynch-Gibbon. Honor Klein is a force, is suspicion, and fear, and seems to be an external projection of Martin’s subconscious imaginary fears and trauma. She has a similar narrative function as Shakespeare‘s ghosts in, e.g., Macbeth, Hamlet and Julius Caesar.
艾瑞斯·默多克的小说《一颗被砍下的头颅》(1961)是一个错综复杂的人际关系的例子,表面上看可能会显得很滑稽。然而,仔细阅读就会发现,主人公的行为引发了痛苦。最神秘的女主人公,性矛盾的奥诺·克莱因(Honor Klein),有各种各样的可能解释。荣耀的强大形象就像一个轴,其他角色围绕着它旋转,没有她,情节就会崩溃。然而,问题是,她是否是一个真实的人物。本文认为,这个关键人物不是一个真实的人,而是与主人公马丁·林奇-吉本有关的各种元素的梦幻和幽灵般的集中。奥娜·克莱因是一种力量,是怀疑和恐惧,似乎是马丁潜意识中想象的恐惧和创伤的外部投射。她的叙事功能与莎士比亚的《麦克白》、《哈姆雷特》和《凯撒大帝》中的鬼魂相似。
{"title":"A Shadow of Truth: Honor Klein in Iris Murdoch’s A Severed Head","authors":"Barbora Kašpárková","doi":"10.2478/pjes-2019-0002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2478/pjes-2019-0002","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Iris Murdoch’s novel A Severed Head (1961) is an example of convoluted relationships that may appear hilarious upon superficial analysis. A close reading, however, reveals the suffering triggered by the behaviour of the central characters. The most mysterious female protagonist, the sexually ambivalent Honor Klein, deploys a wide range of possible interpretations. Honor’s powerful figure is like an axis around which the rest of the characters rotate and without whom the plot would fall apart. The question is, nonetheless, if she is a real figure or not. This paper argues that this pivotal character is not a real person but a dreamy and ghostly concentration of elements in relation to the protagonist Martin Lynch-Gibbon. Honor Klein is a force, is suspicion, and fear, and seems to be an external projection of Martin’s subconscious imaginary fears and trauma. She has a similar narrative function as Shakespeare‘s ghosts in, e.g., Macbeth, Hamlet and Julius Caesar.","PeriodicalId":402791,"journal":{"name":"Prague Journal of English Studies","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127727588","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Suburban Identity in the Poetry of John Updike 约翰·厄普代克诗歌中的郊区身份
Pub Date : 2019-07-01 DOI: 10.2478/PJES-2019-0003
Jiří Flajšar
Abstract This paper provides a close reading of a representative selection of suburban poems by the American writer John Updike (1932–2009). It also draws upon the existing scholarship by suburban studies historians (including Kenneth Jackson, Dolores Hayden, John Archer, and James Howard Kunstler), who have argued for the cultural importance of American suburbia in fostering identity, and develops the argument by literary critics including Jo Gill, Peter Monacell, and Robert von Hallberg, who have championed the existence of a viable suburban tradition in postwar American poetry. By scrutinizing poems from Updike’s early poetry, represented by “Shillington”, up to his closing lyric opus, “Endpoint”, the paper argues that Updike’s unrecognized importance is that of a major postwar poet whose lyric work chronicles, in memorable, diverse, and important ways, the construction of individual identity within suburbia, in a dominant setting for most Americans from the 1950s up to the present.
本文对美国作家约翰·厄普代克(John Updike, 1932-2009)的一部具有代表性的郊区诗歌选集进行了细读。它还借鉴了郊区研究历史学家(包括肯尼斯·杰克逊、多洛雷斯·海登、约翰·阿彻和詹姆斯·霍华德·昆斯特勒)现有的学术成果,他们认为美国郊区在培养身份认同方面具有文化重要性,并发展了包括乔·吉尔、彼得·莫纳塞尔和罗伯特·冯·哈尔伯格在内的文学评论家的论点,他们支持战后美国诗歌中存在可行的郊区传统。通过对厄普代克早期诗歌(以《希灵顿》为代表)到其最后的抒情作品《终点》的仔细研究,本文认为厄普代克未被认识到的重要性在于,他是一位重要的战后诗人,他的抒情作品以令人难忘的、多样化的和重要的方式,记录了从20世纪50年代到现在,在大多数美国人的主导背景下,在郊区建立个人身份。
{"title":"Suburban Identity in the Poetry of John Updike","authors":"Jiří Flajšar","doi":"10.2478/PJES-2019-0003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2478/PJES-2019-0003","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper provides a close reading of a representative selection of suburban poems by the American writer John Updike (1932–2009). It also draws upon the existing scholarship by suburban studies historians (including Kenneth Jackson, Dolores Hayden, John Archer, and James Howard Kunstler), who have argued for the cultural importance of American suburbia in fostering identity, and develops the argument by literary critics including Jo Gill, Peter Monacell, and Robert von Hallberg, who have championed the existence of a viable suburban tradition in postwar American poetry. By scrutinizing poems from Updike’s early poetry, represented by “Shillington”, up to his closing lyric opus, “Endpoint”, the paper argues that Updike’s unrecognized importance is that of a major postwar poet whose lyric work chronicles, in memorable, diverse, and important ways, the construction of individual identity within suburbia, in a dominant setting for most Americans from the 1950s up to the present.","PeriodicalId":402791,"journal":{"name":"Prague Journal of English Studies","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131421772","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Early Modern Cultural Hybridity: Bartholomew Fair as a Heterotopia of Hamlet 近代早期文化混杂:巴塞洛缪集市作为哈姆雷特的异托邦
Pub Date : 2019-07-01 DOI: 10.2478/pjes-2019-0001
M. Procházka
Abstract As a contribution to the discussion of Shakespeare’s “appropriability” (Stanley Cavell), this paper examines some aspects of the cultural position of Hamlet on the Jacobean entertainment market, as they are indicated in Ben Jonson’s comedy Bartholomew Fair (1614). The metatheatrical features of Bartholomew Fair may be said to measure the play’s resistance against appropriating the unique and problematic aspects of Hamlet, such as the Ghost or The Mousetrap. These are deconstructed in Jonson’s comedy, which anticipates the Enlightenment views of the social functioning of theatre as a “moral institution”.
本·琼生的喜剧《巴塞洛缪集市》(1614)从几个方面考察了哈姆雷特在詹姆士时代娱乐市场上的文化地位,作为对斯坦利·卡维尔关于莎士比亚“适当性”的讨论的贡献。《巴塞洛缪集市》的元戏剧特征可以说是衡量该剧对《哈姆雷特》独特和有问题的方面(如《幽灵》或《捕鼠器》)的抵制。在约翰逊的喜剧中,这些都被解构了,它预测了启蒙运动关于戏剧作为“道德机构”的社会功能的观点。
{"title":"Early Modern Cultural Hybridity: Bartholomew Fair as a Heterotopia of Hamlet","authors":"M. Procházka","doi":"10.2478/pjes-2019-0001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2478/pjes-2019-0001","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract As a contribution to the discussion of Shakespeare’s “appropriability” (Stanley Cavell), this paper examines some aspects of the cultural position of Hamlet on the Jacobean entertainment market, as they are indicated in Ben Jonson’s comedy Bartholomew Fair (1614). The metatheatrical features of Bartholomew Fair may be said to measure the play’s resistance against appropriating the unique and problematic aspects of Hamlet, such as the Ghost or The Mousetrap. These are deconstructed in Jonson’s comedy, which anticipates the Enlightenment views of the social functioning of theatre as a “moral institution”.","PeriodicalId":402791,"journal":{"name":"Prague Journal of English Studies","volume":"1099 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"113995082","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
“I am rather strong on Voyages and Cannibalism”: The other Dickens and other Victorians in Richard Flanagan’s Wanting “我很擅长航海和食人”:理查德·弗拉纳根《欲望》中的其他狄更斯和维多利亚时代的人
Pub Date : 2019-07-01 DOI: 10.2478/pjes-2019-0009
B. Kucała
Abstract This paper analyses Richard Flanagan’s novel Wanting (2008) as a narrative informed by a revisionary and critical attitude to nineteenth-century ideologies, which is common to, and, indeed, stereotypical in much neo-Victorian fiction. Drawing on the biographies of two eminent Victorians: Charles Dickens and Sir John Franklin, Flanagan constructs their fictional counterparts as split between a respectable, public persona and a dark, inner self. While all the Victorian characters are represented as “other” than their public image, the focus in the novel, and in this paper, is on Dickens’s struggle to reconcile social propriety with his personal discontent. Flanagan represents this conflict through Dickens’s response to the allegations that starving survivors of Franklin’s ill-fated Arctic expedition resorted to cannibalism. The zeal with which the Victorian writer refuted such reports reveals his own difficulty in living up to social and moral norms. The paper argues that the main link between the different narrative strands in the novel is the challenge they collectively pose to the distinction between the notions of civilization and savagery.
摘要:本文分析了理查德·弗拉纳根的小说《欲望》(2008),认为这是一种对19世纪意识形态的修正和批判态度的叙事,这种态度在许多新维多利亚时代的小说中是常见的,而且实际上是刻板的。根据维多利亚时代两位杰出人物的传记:查尔斯·狄更斯和约翰·富兰克林爵士,弗拉纳根将他们的小说对手划分为受人尊敬的公众形象和黑暗的内心自我。虽然所有维多利亚时代的人物都被描绘成与他们的公众形象不同的“他者”,但小说和本文的重点是狄更斯在社会礼仪与个人不满之间调和的斗争。通过狄更斯对富兰克林不幸的北极探险队中饥饿的幸存者诉诸同类相食的指控的回应,弗拉纳根表现了这种冲突。这位维多利亚时代的作家驳斥这些报道的热情,揭示了他自己在遵守社会和道德规范方面的困难。本文认为,小说中不同叙事线之间的主要联系是它们共同对文明与野蛮概念之间的区别提出了挑战。
{"title":"“I am rather strong on Voyages and Cannibalism”: The other Dickens and other Victorians in Richard Flanagan’s Wanting","authors":"B. Kucała","doi":"10.2478/pjes-2019-0009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2478/pjes-2019-0009","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper analyses Richard Flanagan’s novel Wanting (2008) as a narrative informed by a revisionary and critical attitude to nineteenth-century ideologies, which is common to, and, indeed, stereotypical in much neo-Victorian fiction. Drawing on the biographies of two eminent Victorians: Charles Dickens and Sir John Franklin, Flanagan constructs their fictional counterparts as split between a respectable, public persona and a dark, inner self. While all the Victorian characters are represented as “other” than their public image, the focus in the novel, and in this paper, is on Dickens’s struggle to reconcile social propriety with his personal discontent. Flanagan represents this conflict through Dickens’s response to the allegations that starving survivors of Franklin’s ill-fated Arctic expedition resorted to cannibalism. The zeal with which the Victorian writer refuted such reports reveals his own difficulty in living up to social and moral norms. The paper argues that the main link between the different narrative strands in the novel is the challenge they collectively pose to the distinction between the notions of civilization and savagery.","PeriodicalId":402791,"journal":{"name":"Prague Journal of English Studies","volume":"235 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121217783","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Remediating Joyce’s Techno-Poetics: Mark Amerika, Kenneth Goldsmith, Mark Z. Danielewski 修复乔伊斯的技术诗学:马克·阿梅里卡,肯尼斯·戈德史密斯,马克·z·丹尼尔维斯基
Pub Date : 2019-07-01 DOI: 10.2478/pjes-2019-0007
David Vichnar
Abstract This paper attempts to evaluate the legacy of James Joyce’s avant-gardism for the literary experimentation of Mark Amerika, Kenneth Goldsmith, and Mark Z. Danielewski, three contemporary American writers and artists, working a hundred years after the first of Joyce’s crucial four “shocks of the new” shook the foundations of fiction. In doing so, the paper attempts to bridge the divide between the historical avant-garde and the neo-avant-garde as defined by Renato Poggioli and Peter Bürger, and regarded disparagingly by critics like Robert Hughes. Positing a threefold legacy of Joyce’s “revolution of the word” in its treatment of writing as trace, forgery, and idiom, the paper discusses Amerika’s Grammatron, Goldsmith’s uncreative writing, and Danielewski’s House of Leaves as continuing in and expanding on the achievements of Ulysses and Finnegans Wake. This they achieve by pursuing what Marjorie Perloff has termed “differential poetics” and N. Katherine Hayles has rethought as “Assemblage” – two poetic strategies dominant at the beginning of the 21st century.
摘要:本文试图评价詹姆斯·乔伊斯的先锋主义对马克·阿梅里卡、肯尼斯·戈德史密斯和马克·z·丹尼莱夫斯基三位当代美国作家和艺术家的文学实验的影响,他们在乔伊斯的四次重要的“新冲击”中的第一次动摇了小说的基础一百年后工作。在这样做的过程中,本文试图弥合历史先锋派和新先锋派之间的鸿沟,新先锋派由雷纳托·波焦利和彼得·布尔格定义,并被罗伯特·休斯等评论家轻蔑地看待。乔伊斯的“文字革命”在处理文字的痕迹、伪造和习惯用语方面留下了三重遗产,本文讨论了美国的《语法》、戈德史密斯的非创造性写作和丹尼尔列夫斯基的《树叶之屋》,这些都是对《尤利西斯》和《芬尼根守灵夜》成就的延续和扩展。他们通过追求Marjorie Perloff所称的“差异诗学”和N. Katherine Hayles所重新思考的“组合”来实现这一目标——这是21世纪初占主导地位的两种诗歌策略。
{"title":"Remediating Joyce’s Techno-Poetics: Mark Amerika, Kenneth Goldsmith, Mark Z. Danielewski","authors":"David Vichnar","doi":"10.2478/pjes-2019-0007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2478/pjes-2019-0007","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper attempts to evaluate the legacy of James Joyce’s avant-gardism for the literary experimentation of Mark Amerika, Kenneth Goldsmith, and Mark Z. Danielewski, three contemporary American writers and artists, working a hundred years after the first of Joyce’s crucial four “shocks of the new” shook the foundations of fiction. In doing so, the paper attempts to bridge the divide between the historical avant-garde and the neo-avant-garde as defined by Renato Poggioli and Peter Bürger, and regarded disparagingly by critics like Robert Hughes. Positing a threefold legacy of Joyce’s “revolution of the word” in its treatment of writing as trace, forgery, and idiom, the paper discusses Amerika’s Grammatron, Goldsmith’s uncreative writing, and Danielewski’s House of Leaves as continuing in and expanding on the achievements of Ulysses and Finnegans Wake. This they achieve by pursuing what Marjorie Perloff has termed “differential poetics” and N. Katherine Hayles has rethought as “Assemblage” – two poetic strategies dominant at the beginning of the 21st century.","PeriodicalId":402791,"journal":{"name":"Prague Journal of English Studies","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127999034","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Aesthetic Universals in Neil Gaiman’s Post-Postmodern Mythmaking 尼尔·盖曼后后现代神话创作中的美学共性
Pub Date : 2019-07-01 DOI: 10.2478/pjes-2019-0006
Ivan Čipkár
Abstract Aesthetic theory, as reflected in both contemporary cognitive (Patrick Colm Hogan) and more traditional structuralist criticism (H.G. Widdowson), points to the dynamics between familiarity and surprise as the driving force behind the pleasure we derive from reading fiction. This paper explains how Neil Gaiman’s works, particularly his novel Neverwhere, utilize genre expectations and reinvent mythologies in order to captivate audiences in the current age of unprecedented access to information and a rather superficial intertextuality. The paper draws on Brian Attebery’s analyses of the literature of the fantastic to place Gaiman within the context of both modernist and postmodernist legacies, while proposing that his works could be best understood as representative of the current cultural paradigm, sometimes labelled as the pseudo-modern or post-postmodernism. The discussion of the shifting paradigm is used as a backdrop for the scrutiny of the devices employed in Gaiman’s writing: the pre-modern focus on storytelling, prototypicality, modernist “mythic principle”, postmodernist textual strategies, and utilization of current technologies and mass-communication media.
当代认知文学(帕特里克·科尔姆·霍根)和更传统的结构主义批评文学(h·g·威德道森)所反映的美学理论指出,我们从阅读小说中获得的乐趣背后的驱动力是熟悉和惊讶之间的动态关系。本文解释了尼尔·盖曼的作品,特别是他的小说《Neverwhere》,如何利用类型预期和重塑神话,以在当今这个前所未有的信息获取和相当肤浅的互文性的时代吸引观众。本文借鉴了Brian Attebery对奇幻文学的分析,将Gaiman置于现代主义和后现代主义遗产的背景下,同时提出他的作品可以最好地理解为当前文化范式的代表,有时被称为伪现代主义或后后现代主义。对这种转变范式的讨论被用作审视Gaiman写作中使用的手段的背景:前现代主义对叙事的关注、原型性、现代主义的“神话原则”、后现代主义的文本策略,以及对当前技术和大众传播媒体的利用。
{"title":"Aesthetic Universals in Neil Gaiman’s Post-Postmodern Mythmaking","authors":"Ivan Čipkár","doi":"10.2478/pjes-2019-0006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2478/pjes-2019-0006","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Aesthetic theory, as reflected in both contemporary cognitive (Patrick Colm Hogan) and more traditional structuralist criticism (H.G. Widdowson), points to the dynamics between familiarity and surprise as the driving force behind the pleasure we derive from reading fiction. This paper explains how Neil Gaiman’s works, particularly his novel Neverwhere, utilize genre expectations and reinvent mythologies in order to captivate audiences in the current age of unprecedented access to information and a rather superficial intertextuality. The paper draws on Brian Attebery’s analyses of the literature of the fantastic to place Gaiman within the context of both modernist and postmodernist legacies, while proposing that his works could be best understood as representative of the current cultural paradigm, sometimes labelled as the pseudo-modern or post-postmodernism. The discussion of the shifting paradigm is used as a backdrop for the scrutiny of the devices employed in Gaiman’s writing: the pre-modern focus on storytelling, prototypicality, modernist “mythic principle”, postmodernist textual strategies, and utilization of current technologies and mass-communication media.","PeriodicalId":402791,"journal":{"name":"Prague Journal of English Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122045575","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Prague Journal of English Studies
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1