U članku je predstavljena realizacija CIP programa u Bosni i Hercegovini i njegov značaj za izdavače i biblioteke. Istaknuto je koliko je bitna suradnja između izdavača i biblioteka. Dat je prikaz CIP programa u Bosni i Hercegovini, ali i naznačene smjernice za daljnji rad.-----------------------------------------CIP programme in Bosnia and Herzegovina: the experience of the National and University Library of Bosnia and HerzegovinaThe article presents the implementation of the CIP programme in Bosnia and Herzegovina and its significance for publishers and libraries. The importance of cooperation between publishers and libraries was emphasized. An overview of the CIP programme in Bosnia and Herzegovina is given, as well as guidelines for further work.
文章介绍了CIP方案在波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那的实施情况及其对出版商和图书馆的重要性。Istaknuto je koliko je bitna suradnja izmeřu izdavača i biblioteka。本文介绍了CIP计划在波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那的实施情况及其对出版商和图书馆的意义。强调了出版商和图书馆之间合作的重要性。概述了波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那的CIP方案,以及进一步工作的指导方针。
{"title":"CIP program u Bosni i Hercegovini: iskustvo Nacionalne i univerzitetske biblioteke Bosne i Hercegovine","authors":"Viktorija Martinčević-Huseinčehajić","doi":"10.37083/bosn.2020.25.9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37083/bosn.2020.25.9","url":null,"abstract":"U članku je predstavljena realizacija CIP programa u Bosni i Hercegovini i njegov značaj za izdavače i biblioteke. Istaknuto je koliko je bitna suradnja između izdavača i biblioteka. Dat je prikaz CIP programa u Bosni i Hercegovini, ali i naznačene smjernice za daljnji rad.-----------------------------------------CIP programme in Bosnia and Herzegovina: the experience of the National and University Library of Bosnia and HerzegovinaThe article presents the implementation of the CIP programme in Bosnia and Herzegovina and its significance for publishers and libraries. The importance of cooperation between publishers and libraries was emphasized. An overview of the CIP programme in Bosnia and Herzegovina is given, as well as guidelines for further work.","PeriodicalId":40324,"journal":{"name":"Bosniaca-Journal of the National and University Library of Bosnia and Herzegovina","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2020-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48000601","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-14DOI: 10.37083/bosn.2020.25.88
Hana Younis
Ovaj rad na primjeru slučaja Walny protiv Kajona zbog autorskih prava prikazuje stanje u Bosni i Hercegovini na ovom polju u periodu austrougarske uprave. Kako je regulisano zakonski pravo autora i kako se to pravo moglo otuđiti, autorica kroz (pre)štampa(va)nje djela Plan von Sarajevo und Umgebung – Plan Sarajeva i okolice jasno oslikava. Akteri ove parnice su poznati javnosti kao književnici, vlasnici i urednici uglednih časopisa i štamparija, zbog čega ovaj slučaj zavrjeđuje posebnu pažnju.------------------------------------------ (Re)printing and copyright in the beginning of the 20th century in Bosnia and HerzegovinaThis work focuses on the Walny vs. Kajon copyright infringement case, showing the situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina within this field during the Austro-Hungarian rule. The author shows how copyright was legally regulated and how it could have led to infringement, through methods of (re)printing of Plan von Sarajevo und Umgebung. Participants of this legal case are well known to public, as writers, owners and editors of respectable journals and printing houses. For this reason, this case deserves some special attention.
{"title":"(Pre)štampa(va)nje djela i autorska prava početkom 20. stoljeća u Bosni i Hercegovini","authors":"Hana Younis","doi":"10.37083/bosn.2020.25.88","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37083/bosn.2020.25.88","url":null,"abstract":"Ovaj rad na primjeru slučaja Walny protiv Kajona zbog autorskih prava prikazuje stanje u Bosni i Hercegovini na ovom polju u periodu austrougarske uprave. Kako je regulisano zakonski pravo autora i kako se to pravo moglo otuđiti, autorica kroz (pre)štampa(va)nje djela Plan von Sarajevo und Umgebung – Plan Sarajeva i okolice jasno oslikava. Akteri ove parnice su poznati javnosti kao književnici, vlasnici i urednici uglednih časopisa i štamparija, zbog čega ovaj slučaj zavrjeđuje posebnu pažnju.------------------------------------------ (Re)printing and copyright in the beginning of the 20th century in Bosnia and HerzegovinaThis work focuses on the Walny vs. Kajon copyright infringement case, showing the situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina within this field during the Austro-Hungarian rule. The author shows how copyright was legally regulated and how it could have led to infringement, through methods of (re)printing of Plan von Sarajevo und Umgebung. Participants of this legal case are well known to public, as writers, owners and editors of respectable journals and printing houses. For this reason, this case deserves some special attention.","PeriodicalId":40324,"journal":{"name":"Bosniaca-Journal of the National and University Library of Bosnia and Herzegovina","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2020-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41584293","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-14DOI: 10.37083/bosn.2020.25.42
Anita Konjicija-Kovač
Privatnost kao pravni koncept nezaobilazan je dio modernog demokratskog društva i prepoznato je kao jedno od temeljnih ljudskih prava svakog građanina. Pravo na privatnost i zaštitu osobnih podataka zajamčeni su međunarodnim dokumentima o ljudskim pravima. U knjižničarskoj se djelatnosti pravo na privatnost i zaštitu osobnih podataka također garantira u dokumentima međunarodnih knjižničarskih udruženja u kojima se jasno naglašava da su knjižničari u svom radu obvezni da štite privatnost i osobne podatke svojih korisnika. Privatnost i osobne podatke je danas sve teže zaštititi, jer je pristup podacima jednostavniji i lakši zbog korištenja različitih i novih informacionih tehnologija, elektronskog komuniciranja, društvenih mreža, elektronskih baza podataka itd. Osobna se prava garantiraju međunarodnim dokumentima o zaštiti osobnih podataka, a štite se nacionalnim zakonima o zaštiti osobnih podataka. Glavni ciljevi rada su: problematizirati definiranje pojma privatnosti iz nekoliko perspektiva; problematizirati značaj prava na privatnost i zaštitu osobnih podataka u kontekstu knjižničarske profesije; dati pregled značajnijih međunarodnih dokumenata u području ljudskih prava u kojima se garantira i pravo na privatnost i zaštitu osobnih podataka; načiniti osvrt na značajnije međunarodne dokumente kojima se garantira pravo na zaštitu i tajnost osobnih podataka; i na kraju rad će dati pregled dokumenata međunarodnih knjižničarskih udruženja koji u svojim tekstovima ukazuju na značaj privatnosti i zaštite osobnih podataka u knjižničnoj djelatnosti.------------------------------------------------------------Right to privacy and protection of personal data in libraries: perspectives and documentsPrivacy as a legal concept is an unavoidable part of a modern democratic society and is recognized as one of the fundamental human rights of every citizen. The right to privacy and the protection of personal data are guaranteed by international human rights documents. In librarianship, the right to privacy and protection of personal data is also guaranteed in the documents of international library associations, which clearly emphasize that librarians are obliged in their work to protect the privacy and personal data of their users. Privacy and personal data are increasingly difficult to protect today, as access to data is simpler and easier due to the use of different and new information technologies, electronic communication, social networks, electronic databases, etc. Personal rights are guaranteed by international documents on protection of personal data and protected by national personal data protection laws. The main objectives of the paper are: to problematize the definition of the concept of privacy from several perspectives; problematize the importance of the right to privacy and protection of personal data in the context of the library profession; provide an overview of significant international documents in the field of human rights which also guarantee t
隐私作为一个法律概念是现代民主社会的一部分,被公认为每个公民的基本人权之一。隐私权和个人数据保护权受到国际人权文件的保障。在图书馆,国际图书馆的文件也保障了隐私权和个人数据保护权,明确强调图书馆在工作中有义务保护其隐私和个人数据不受用户侵犯。如今,隐私和个人数据更难保护,因为使用了不同的新信息技术、电子通信、社交网络、电子数据库等,访问数据变得更简单、更容易。个人权利受到国际个人数据保护文件的保障,并受到国家个人数据保护法的保护。这项工作的主要目标是从几个角度挑战对隐私概念的定义;对文学专业背景下隐私和个人数据保护的重要性提出质疑;概述人权领域保障隐私权和保护个人数据的更重要的国际文件;načiniti osvrt na značajnije meŞunarodne dokumente kojima se garantira pravo na zaštitu i tajnost osobnih podataka;最后,这项工作将对国际图书馆的文件进行审查,这些文件在其文本中表明了图书馆工作中隐私和保护个人数据的重要性----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------隐私权和图书馆个人数据保护:观点和文件隐私权作为一个法律概念是现代民主社会不可避免的一部分,被公认为每个公民的基本人权之一。隐私权和个人数据保护受到国际人权文件的保障。在图书馆工作中,国际图书馆协会的文件也保障了隐私权和个人数据保护权,这些文件明确强调,图书馆员在工作中有义务保护用户的隐私和个人数据。如今,隐私和个人数据越来越难以保护,因为由于使用了不同的新信息技术、电子通信、社交网络、电子数据库等,获取数据变得更加简单和容易。个人权利受到保护个人数据的国际文件的保障,并受到国家个人数据保护法的保护。本文的主要目的是:从几个角度对隐私概念的定义提出问题;质疑隐私权和个人数据保护在图书馆行业中的重要性;概述人权领域的重要国际文件,这些文件也保障隐私权和个人数据保护权;审查保障个人数据保护权和保密权的重要国际文件;最后,本文将概述国际图书馆协会的文件,这些文件在其文本中表明了隐私和个人数据保护在图书馆业务中的重要性。
{"title":"Pravo na privatnost i zaštitu osobnih podataka u knjižnicama: perspektive i dokumenti","authors":"Anita Konjicija-Kovač","doi":"10.37083/bosn.2020.25.42","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37083/bosn.2020.25.42","url":null,"abstract":"Privatnost kao pravni koncept nezaobilazan je dio modernog demokratskog društva i prepoznato je kao jedno od temeljnih ljudskih prava svakog građanina. Pravo na privatnost i zaštitu osobnih podataka zajamčeni su međunarodnim dokumentima o ljudskim pravima. U knjižničarskoj se djelatnosti pravo na privatnost i zaštitu osobnih podataka također garantira u dokumentima međunarodnih knjižničarskih udruženja u kojima se jasno naglašava da su knjižničari u svom radu obvezni da štite privatnost i osobne podatke svojih korisnika. Privatnost i osobne podatke je danas sve teže zaštititi, jer je pristup podacima jednostavniji i lakši zbog korištenja različitih i novih informacionih tehnologija, elektronskog komuniciranja, društvenih mreža, elektronskih baza podataka itd. Osobna se prava garantiraju međunarodnim dokumentima o zaštiti osobnih podataka, a štite se nacionalnim zakonima o zaštiti osobnih podataka. Glavni ciljevi rada su: problematizirati definiranje pojma privatnosti iz nekoliko perspektiva; problematizirati značaj prava na privatnost i zaštitu osobnih podataka u kontekstu knjižničarske profesije; dati pregled značajnijih međunarodnih dokumenata u području ljudskih prava u kojima se garantira i pravo na privatnost i zaštitu osobnih podataka; načiniti osvrt na značajnije međunarodne dokumente kojima se garantira pravo na zaštitu i tajnost osobnih podataka; i na kraju rad će dati pregled dokumenata međunarodnih knjižničarskih udruženja koji u svojim tekstovima ukazuju na značaj privatnosti i zaštite osobnih podataka u knjižničnoj djelatnosti.------------------------------------------------------------Right to privacy and protection of personal data in libraries: perspectives and documentsPrivacy as a legal concept is an unavoidable part of a modern democratic society and is recognized as one of the fundamental human rights of every citizen. The right to privacy and the protection of personal data are guaranteed by international human rights documents. In librarianship, the right to privacy and protection of personal data is also guaranteed in the documents of international library associations, which clearly emphasize that librarians are obliged in their work to protect the privacy and personal data of their users. Privacy and personal data are increasingly difficult to protect today, as access to data is simpler and easier due to the use of different and new information technologies, electronic communication, social networks, electronic databases, etc. Personal rights are guaranteed by international documents on protection of personal data and protected by national personal data protection laws. The main objectives of the paper are: to problematize the definition of the concept of privacy from several perspectives; problematize the importance of the right to privacy and protection of personal data in the context of the library profession; provide an overview of significant international documents in the field of human rights which also guarantee t","PeriodicalId":40324,"journal":{"name":"Bosniaca-Journal of the National and University Library of Bosnia and Herzegovina","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2020-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42386954","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-14DOI: 10.37083/bosn.2020.25.78
A. Likhomanov, K. Morozova
This article explores the evolution of the audience of the National Library of Russia (NLR) from the beginning of the XIX century until the present day. The author demonstrates how political and economic factors influenced social and gender characteristics of readers of the NLR, increase in the amount of readers, strengthening of the role of the library as one of the largest cultural and information centers in the world--------------------------------------------------- Čitalačka publika Nacionalne biblioteke Rusije u 19. i početkom 21. stoljećaOvaj članak istražuje razvoj čitalačke publike Nacionalne biblioteke Rusije (NBR) od početka 19. stoljeća do danas. Autori pokazuju kako su politički i ekonomski činioci utjecali na socijalne i rodne karakteristike čitalačke publike NBR-a, povećanje broja čitatelja, jačanje uloge biblioteke kao jednog od najvećih kulturnih i informacijskih centara na svijetu.
本文探讨了俄罗斯国家图书馆(NLR)读者从19世纪初到今天的演变。作者展示了政治和经济因素如何影响NLR读者的社会和性别特征,读者数量的增加,图书馆作为世界上最大的文化和信息中心之一的作用的加强----------------------------------------------------Čitalačka publika Nacionalne biblioteke Rusije u 19。和21世纪本文探讨了19世纪初俄罗斯国家图书馆读者的发展。迄今为止的几个世纪。作者表明,政治和经济因素影响了NBR读者的社会和出生特征,增加了读者数量,加强了图书馆作为世界上最大的文化和信息中心之一的作用。
{"title":"The readers of the National Library of Russia in XIX – beginning of XXI century","authors":"A. Likhomanov, K. Morozova","doi":"10.37083/bosn.2020.25.78","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37083/bosn.2020.25.78","url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the evolution of the audience of the National Library of Russia (NLR) from the beginning of the XIX century until the present day. The author demonstrates how political and economic factors influenced social and gender characteristics of readers of the NLR, increase in the amount of readers, strengthening of the role of the library as one of the largest cultural and information centers in the world--------------------------------------------------- Čitalačka publika Nacionalne biblioteke Rusije u 19. i početkom 21. stoljećaOvaj članak istražuje razvoj čitalačke publike Nacionalne biblioteke Rusije (NBR) od početka 19. stoljeća do danas. Autori pokazuju kako su politički i ekonomski činioci utjecali na socijalne i rodne karakteristike čitalačke publike NBR-a, povećanje broja čitatelja, jačanje uloge biblioteke kao jednog od najvećih kulturnih i informacijskih centara na svijetu.","PeriodicalId":40324,"journal":{"name":"Bosniaca-Journal of the National and University Library of Bosnia and Herzegovina","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2020-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45508005","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-14DOI: 10.37083/bosn.2020.25.172
Tamara Malešev, Irena Zečević, Olivеra Topalov
Оснивање културних друштава и институција широм Србије након Балканских ратова, било је један од приоритета Краљевине Србије. Осим Културне лиге, деловале су и српске земљорадничке задруге, радничка и партијска удружења, обједињени у важној мисији – образовању, просвећивању и културном уздизању свог народа. Ауторке рада настоје да прате историјски развој Културне лиге, чијим развојем и деловањем су се створили услови за настанак јавних библиотека у Србији.----------------------------------------------Cultural Leagues – forerunners of public libraries in SerbiaThe establishment of cultural societies and institutions throughout Serbia after the Balkan wars were one of the priorities of the Kingdom of Serbia. In addition to the Cultural League, there were also Serbian agricultural cooperatives, workers' and party associations, united in an important mission – education and enlightenment of their people. The authors of the paper try to follow the historical development of the Cultural League, whose development and activities have created the conditions for the emergence of public libraries in Serbia.
{"title":"Културне лиге – претече јавних библиотека у Србији","authors":"Tamara Malešev, Irena Zečević, Olivеra Topalov","doi":"10.37083/bosn.2020.25.172","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37083/bosn.2020.25.172","url":null,"abstract":"Оснивање културних друштава и институција широм Србије након Балканских ратова, било је један од приоритета Краљевине Србије. Осим Културне лиге, деловале су и српске земљорадничке задруге, радничка и партијска удружења, обједињени у важној мисији – образовању, просвећивању и културном уздизању свог народа. Ауторке рада настоје да прате историјски развој Културне лиге, чијим развојем и деловањем су се створили услови за настанак јавних библиотека у Србији.----------------------------------------------Cultural Leagues – forerunners of public libraries in SerbiaThe establishment of cultural societies and institutions throughout Serbia after the Balkan wars were one of the priorities of the Kingdom of Serbia. In addition to the Cultural League, there were also Serbian agricultural cooperatives, workers' and party associations, united in an important mission – education and enlightenment of their people. The authors of the paper try to follow the historical development of the Cultural League, whose development and activities have created the conditions for the emergence of public libraries in Serbia.","PeriodicalId":40324,"journal":{"name":"Bosniaca-Journal of the National and University Library of Bosnia and Herzegovina","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2020-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47494145","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-14DOI: 10.37083/bosn.2020.25.157
Amila Kasumović
Početkom 20. stoljeća brojne krize potresale su Balkan; a one poput Aneksione (1908–1909) i Balkanskih ratova (1912–1913) snažno su utjecale na gibanja u bosanskohercegovačkom društvu. Suočena s vrlo kompleksnom političkom situacijom na Balkanu; Austro-Ugarska je morala izgraditi strategiju jačanja svog utjecaja na ovom području. U tom smislu; Sarajevo je trebalo odigrati vrlo važnu ulogu. U ovom radu se želi pokazati kako je austrougarska vlast u Bosni i Hercegovini; plasirajući ideju da bi se u Sarajevu mogao osnovati univerzitet; lavirala između davno zacrtane kulturne misije u datom području i političkih mahinacija kojima se trebao anulirati rastući utjecaj Srbije. Reakcija javnosti; kako one u Bosni i Hercegovini; tako i one u Monarhiji; na ideju o osnivanju sarajevskog univerziteta; primorala je njene glavne zagovornike na propitivanje vlastitih političkih rezona.------------------------------------------- The idea of establishing the University of Sarajevo at the beginning of 20th century: Austro-Hungarian authority in Bosnia and Herzegovina between cultural mission and political realityAt the beginning of the 20th century; the Balkans was the epicentre of numerous crises and some of them (the Annexation Crisis 1908–1909 and the Balkan Wars 1912–1913) had a major effect on social activities in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Therefore; faced with a very complex political situation in the Balkans; Austro-Hungary was about to develop a strategy of increasing its own influence in the mentioned area. Consequently; Sarajevo was bound to play an important role in these plans. This paper argues that; by promoting the idea of establishing a university in Sarajevo; the Austro-Hungarian authorities were actually oscillating between their previous plan of conducting a cultural mission in Bosnia and Herzegovina and political machinations aimed at the annihilation of Serbian influence. The public reactions in Bosnia; as well as in the remainder of the Monarchy; forced the solicitors of this idea to re-examine their own political considerations.
Početkom 20。几个世纪以来,巴尔干半岛动摇了许多危机;像安西翁(1908–1909)和巴尔干战争(1912–1913)这样的事件对波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那社会的溺水产生了强烈影响。面对巴尔干地区非常复杂的政治局势;奥匈帝国必须制定一项战略,以加强其在这一领域的影响力。从这个意义上说;萨拉热窝应该发挥非常重要的作用。在这项工作中,表明奥地利政府在波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那;提出在萨拉热窝创建一所大学的想法;在很久以前,数据领域的文化使命和消除塞尔维亚日益增长的影响的政治野心之间的挥霍。Reakcija javnosti;在波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那;以及那些君主政体的人;关于建立萨拉热窝大学的想法;她迫使她的主要谈判代表质疑他们自己的政治决议-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------●20世纪初建立萨拉热窝大学的想法:20世纪初,奥匈人在波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那的权威介于文化使命和政治现实之间;巴尔干半岛是众多危机的中心,其中一些危机(1908–1909年的吞并危机和1912–1913年的巴尔干战争)对波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那的社会活动产生了重大影响。因此面临着巴尔干地区非常复杂的政治局势;奥匈帝国即将制定一项战略,以增加其在上述地区的影响力。因此萨拉热窝必然在这些计划中发挥重要作用。本文认为:;宣传在萨拉热窝建立一所大学的想法;奥匈当局实际上在其先前在波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那执行文化使命的计划和旨在消灭塞尔维亚影响力的政治阴谋之间摇摆不定。波斯尼亚的公众反应;以及君主政体的剩余部分;迫使这一想法的律师们重新审视自己的政治考量。
{"title":"Ideja o osnivanju Univerziteta u Sarajevu početkom 20. stoljeća: austrougarska vlast u Bosni i Hercegovini između kulturne misije i političke realnosti","authors":"Amila Kasumović","doi":"10.37083/bosn.2020.25.157","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37083/bosn.2020.25.157","url":null,"abstract":"Početkom 20. stoljeća brojne krize potresale su Balkan; a one poput Aneksione (1908–1909) i Balkanskih ratova (1912–1913) snažno su utjecale na gibanja u bosanskohercegovačkom društvu. Suočena s vrlo kompleksnom političkom situacijom na Balkanu; Austro-Ugarska je morala izgraditi strategiju jačanja svog utjecaja na ovom području. U tom smislu; Sarajevo je trebalo odigrati vrlo važnu ulogu. U ovom radu se želi pokazati kako je austrougarska vlast u Bosni i Hercegovini; plasirajući ideju da bi se u Sarajevu mogao osnovati univerzitet; lavirala između davno zacrtane kulturne misije u datom području i političkih mahinacija kojima se trebao anulirati rastući utjecaj Srbije. Reakcija javnosti; kako one u Bosni i Hercegovini; tako i one u Monarhiji; na ideju o osnivanju sarajevskog univerziteta; primorala je njene glavne zagovornike na propitivanje vlastitih političkih rezona.------------------------------------------- The idea of establishing the University of Sarajevo at the beginning of 20th century: Austro-Hungarian authority in Bosnia and Herzegovina between cultural mission and political realityAt the beginning of the 20th century; the Balkans was the epicentre of numerous crises and some of them (the Annexation Crisis 1908–1909 and the Balkan Wars 1912–1913) had a major effect on social activities in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Therefore; faced with a very complex political situation in the Balkans; Austro-Hungary was about to develop a strategy of increasing its own influence in the mentioned area. Consequently; Sarajevo was bound to play an important role in these plans. This paper argues that; by promoting the idea of establishing a university in Sarajevo; the Austro-Hungarian authorities were actually oscillating between their previous plan of conducting a cultural mission in Bosnia and Herzegovina and political machinations aimed at the annihilation of Serbian influence. The public reactions in Bosnia; as well as in the remainder of the Monarchy; forced the solicitors of this idea to re-examine their own political considerations.","PeriodicalId":40324,"journal":{"name":"Bosniaca-Journal of the National and University Library of Bosnia and Herzegovina","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2020-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43566996","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-14DOI: 10.37083/bosn.2020.25.60
Emina Adilović
Cilj ovog rada jeste propitati mogućnosti i domete učesničkog modela djelovanja bh. biblioteka u periodu samoupravnog socijalizma za potrebe reosmišljavanja načina poslovanja i odnosa s korisnicima/cama biblioteke kroz novi, participativni pristup. Učesničko djelovanje u prijeratnim bh. bibliotekama i teorijske postavke participatornog bibliotekarstva mogu poslužiti kao polazna tačka za promišljanje modela uključivanja korisnika/ca biblioteke u svojstvu njenih članova/ica. Rezultati ovog rada nastojat će pokazati da učesnički bibliotečki model uvijek zavisi od pojedinih društveno-političkih aspekata državnog uređenja, polazi od različitih metodologija i načina suradnje, ali i da određena vrsta shvatanja učešća dalje implicira širi građanski angažman ili pak verifikaciju postojećeg društvenog stanja. Važnost je ove analize u boljem razumijevanju dvije vrste učesničkog pristupa u bibliotekama koji zbog redefiniranja odnosa s korisnicima/cama mogu polučiti različite oblike društvenog djelovanja i upravljanja.--------------------------------------------Concept of membership in BiH libraries: from self-management towards participationThe aim of this paper is to examine the possibilities and scope of the participatory model of BIH libraries in the period of self-governing socialism for the purpose of rethinking the way of doing business and relations with library users through a new, participatory approach. Participatory activities in pre-war BIH libraries and theoretical assumptions of participatory librarianship can serve as a starting point for considering the current model of involving library users in their capacity as its members. The results of this paper will try to show that the participatory library model always depends on certain socio-political aspects of government, starting from different methodologies and ways of cooperation, but also that certain type of understanding of participation further implies wider civic engagement or verification of the existing social situation. The importance of this analysis is in a better understanding of the two types of participatory approaches in libraries that, due to redefining relationships with users, can lead to different forms of social action and management.
{"title":"Koncept članstva u bh. bibliotekama: od samoupravljanja k participaciji","authors":"Emina Adilović","doi":"10.37083/bosn.2020.25.60","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37083/bosn.2020.25.60","url":null,"abstract":"Cilj ovog rada jeste propitati mogućnosti i domete učesničkog modela djelovanja bh. biblioteka u periodu samoupravnog socijalizma za potrebe reosmišljavanja načina poslovanja i odnosa s korisnicima/cama biblioteke kroz novi, participativni pristup. Učesničko djelovanje u prijeratnim bh. bibliotekama i teorijske postavke participatornog bibliotekarstva mogu poslužiti kao polazna tačka za promišljanje modela uključivanja korisnika/ca biblioteke u svojstvu njenih članova/ica. Rezultati ovog rada nastojat će pokazati da učesnički bibliotečki model uvijek zavisi od pojedinih društveno-političkih aspekata državnog uređenja, polazi od različitih metodologija i načina suradnje, ali i da određena vrsta shvatanja učešća dalje implicira širi građanski angažman ili pak verifikaciju postojećeg društvenog stanja. Važnost je ove analize u boljem razumijevanju dvije vrste učesničkog pristupa u bibliotekama koji zbog redefiniranja odnosa s korisnicima/cama mogu polučiti različite oblike društvenog djelovanja i upravljanja.--------------------------------------------Concept of membership in BiH libraries: from self-management towards participationThe aim of this paper is to examine the possibilities and scope of the participatory model of BIH libraries in the period of self-governing socialism for the purpose of rethinking the way of doing business and relations with library users through a new, participatory approach. Participatory activities in pre-war BIH libraries and theoretical assumptions of participatory librarianship can serve as a starting point for considering the current model of involving library users in their capacity as its members. The results of this paper will try to show that the participatory library model always depends on certain socio-political aspects of government, starting from different methodologies and ways of cooperation, but also that certain type of understanding of participation further implies wider civic engagement or verification of the existing social situation. The importance of this analysis is in a better understanding of the two types of participatory approaches in libraries that, due to redefining relationships with users, can lead to different forms of social action and management.","PeriodicalId":40324,"journal":{"name":"Bosniaca-Journal of the National and University Library of Bosnia and Herzegovina","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2020-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48650749","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-14DOI: 10.37083/bosn.2020.25.141
M. Miloradović
Na primeru nedavno uspostavljene saradnje između Narodne biblioteke Srbije i Zadužbine Milana Mladenovića; jugoslovenskog muzičara i pesnika poslednjih decenija 20. veka; pokazan je model udruživanja tradicionalne baštinske ustanove i privatne institucije u oblasti zaštite kulturne baštine. Posvećena je pažnja načinima na koje se memorijalizuju i muzealizuju ličnosti i pojave iz nedavne prošlosti iz domena “popularne” kulture. Ukazuje se na neophodnost aktivnije uloge tradicionalnih ustanova u “otkrivanju” baštine; proširivanju na netradicionalne oblike stvaralaštva.--------------------------------------------Place of the Popular Music in the System of Cultural Heritage Protection – The Example of Cooperation between National Library of Serbia and Milan Mladenović EndowmentThe Example of recently established cooperation between National Library of Serbia and Endowment of Milan Mladenović (Yugoslav poet and musician from the last decades of 20th century) shows a model of joining traditional heritage institution and a private endowment in the area of cultural heritage protection. Attention is paid to the ways of memorialisation and musealisation of personalities and phenomenons of the past in the domain of “popular” culture. The more active role of traditional institutions in “discovering” heritage is needed; as well as action towards coverage of wider range of non-traditional cultural creations.
{"title":"Mesto popularne muzike u sistemu zaštite kulturne baštine na primeru saradnje Narodne biblioteke Srbije i Zadužbine Milana Mladenovića","authors":"M. Miloradović","doi":"10.37083/bosn.2020.25.141","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37083/bosn.2020.25.141","url":null,"abstract":"Na primeru nedavno uspostavljene saradnje između Narodne biblioteke Srbije i Zadužbine Milana Mladenovića; jugoslovenskog muzičara i pesnika poslednjih decenija 20. veka; pokazan je model udruživanja tradicionalne baštinske ustanove i privatne institucije u oblasti zaštite kulturne baštine. Posvećena je pažnja načinima na koje se memorijalizuju i muzealizuju ličnosti i pojave iz nedavne prošlosti iz domena “popularne” kulture. Ukazuje se na neophodnost aktivnije uloge tradicionalnih ustanova u “otkrivanju” baštine; proširivanju na netradicionalne oblike stvaralaštva.--------------------------------------------Place of the Popular Music in the System of Cultural Heritage Protection – The Example of Cooperation between National Library of Serbia and Milan Mladenović EndowmentThe Example of recently established cooperation between National Library of Serbia and Endowment of Milan Mladenović (Yugoslav poet and musician from the last decades of 20th century) shows a model of joining traditional heritage institution and a private endowment in the area of cultural heritage protection. Attention is paid to the ways of memorialisation and musealisation of personalities and phenomenons of the past in the domain of “popular” culture. The more active role of traditional institutions in “discovering” heritage is needed; as well as action towards coverage of wider range of non-traditional cultural creations.","PeriodicalId":40324,"journal":{"name":"Bosniaca-Journal of the National and University Library of Bosnia and Herzegovina","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2020-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49103273","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-14DOI: 10.37083/bosn.2020.25.183
A. Petrisor
The pressure to publish and get cited along with the extensive use of citation metrics in individual career promotion, research funding and university ranking have radically changed the research ecosystem during the last few decades, favoring the rise of predatory journals. This phenomenon has shaken the very backbone of the system, represented by the peer review process. The present article builds up upon the recommendation for reviewers, including the ethical ones, and articles expressing some concerns related to the peer review in order not to answer, but merely ask several questions that could serve as the start point for a reform of the system. Overall, the role of peer review is not at stakes, but its intricate mechanisms need to adapt to the challenges of the new environment.-------------------------------------------------Stručna recenzija pod etičkim povećalom: moguća pitanjaPritisak da se rad objavi i citira zajedno s velikom upotrebom citatskih metrika u individualnoj promociji karijere, financiranju istraživanja i rangiranju univerziteta radikalno su promijenili istraživački ekosistem tijekom posljednjih nekoliko desetljeća, pogodujući porastu grabežljivih časopisa. Ovaj fenomen je uzdrmao samu okosnicu sistema, predstavljenog postupkom stručne recenzije. Ovaj se članak temelji na preporuci za recenzente, uključujući etiku, te članci izražavaju zabrinutost koja se odnosi na recenziju, ne kako bi dali odgovor, već postavljajući samo nekoliko pitanja koja bi mogla poslužiti kao polazište za reformu sistema. Sveukupno, uloga stručne provjere nije na kocki, ali njeni zamršeni mehanizmi moraju se prilagoditi izazovima novog okruženja.
在过去的几十年里,论文发表和被引用的压力,以及在个人职业晋升、研究经费和大学排名中广泛使用的引用指标,从根本上改变了研究生态系统,有利于掠夺性期刊的崛起。这种现象已经动摇了以同行评审过程为代表的系统的核心。本文以审稿人的建议为基础,包括伦理方面的建议,以及表达与同行评议有关的一些问题的文章,这些文章不是为了回答,而是仅仅提出几个问题,这些问题可以作为系统改革的起点。总的来说,同行评议的作用并不重要,但其复杂的机制需要适应新环境的挑战。------------------------------------------------- stru na recenzija pod eti kim povećalom: moguća pitanjaPritisak da se rad objavi i citira zajedno s velikom upotrebom citatskih metrika u individualnoj promociji karijere, financiancirju istraživanja i rangiranju univerziteta radikalno su promijenili istraživački ekosystem tijekom posljednjih nekoliko desetljeća, pogodujući porastu grabežljivih asopisa。Ovaj women je uzdrmao samu okosnicu sistema, preprestavljenog postupkom strum nerecenzije。Ovaj se temelji na preporuci za recenzente, uključujući etiku, the lanci izražavaju zabrinutost koja se odnosi na recenziju, ne kako bi dali odgovor, veki postavljajući samo nekoliko pitanja koja bi mogla poslužiti kao polazište za reformu sistema。Sveukupno, uloga strut, ne provjere nije na kocki, ali njeni zamršeni mehanizmi moraju se priilagoditi izazovima novog okruženja。
{"title":"Peer review under the ethical lens: possible questions","authors":"A. Petrisor","doi":"10.37083/bosn.2020.25.183","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37083/bosn.2020.25.183","url":null,"abstract":"The pressure to publish and get cited along with the extensive use of citation metrics in individual career promotion, research funding and university ranking have radically changed the research ecosystem during the last few decades, favoring the rise of predatory journals. This phenomenon has shaken the very backbone of the system, represented by the peer review process. The present article builds up upon the recommendation for reviewers, including the ethical ones, and articles expressing some concerns related to the peer review in order not to answer, but merely ask several questions that could serve as the start point for a reform of the system. Overall, the role of peer review is not at stakes, but its intricate mechanisms need to adapt to the challenges of the new environment.-------------------------------------------------Stručna recenzija pod etičkim povećalom: moguća pitanjaPritisak da se rad objavi i citira zajedno s velikom upotrebom citatskih metrika u individualnoj promociji karijere, financiranju istraživanja i rangiranju univerziteta radikalno su promijenili istraživački ekosistem tijekom posljednjih nekoliko desetljeća, pogodujući porastu grabežljivih časopisa. Ovaj fenomen je uzdrmao samu okosnicu sistema, predstavljenog postupkom stručne recenzije. Ovaj se članak temelji na preporuci za recenzente, uključujući etiku, te članci izražavaju zabrinutost koja se odnosi na recenziju, ne kako bi dali odgovor, već postavljajući samo nekoliko pitanja koja bi mogla poslužiti kao polazište za reformu sistema. Sveukupno, uloga stručne provjere nije na kocki, ali njeni zamršeni mehanizmi moraju se prilagoditi izazovima novog okruženja.","PeriodicalId":40324,"journal":{"name":"Bosniaca-Journal of the National and University Library of Bosnia and Herzegovina","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2020-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46917279","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-14DOI: 10.37083/bosn.2020.25.198
I. Vrkić, Ivana Hebrang Grgić, J. Stojanovski, Ksenija Baždarić
Cilj: utvrditi razlike u otvorenosti i dijeljenju znanstvenih radova na Sveučilištu u Rijeci.Metode: Analizirani su znanstveni radovi autora Sveučilišta u Rijeci iz Hrvatske znanstvene bibliografije (CROSBI) u 4 područja (2017.–2019.) na uzorku od 210 radova. Kao metrički pokazatelj kvalitete časopisa korišteni su kvartili SciMago Journal Rank (SJR). Provjerena je prisutnost cjelovitog teksta u otvorenom pristupu u 3 vrste repozitorija (Repozitorij UNIRI – Dabar; ArXiv; Crosbi) i na društvenoj akademskoj mreži ResearchGate. Istraženo je postojanje razlika u stupnju sklonosti samoarhiviranju i dijeljenju radova s obzirom na područje znanosti.Rezultati: Znanstvenici iz područja prirodnih znanosti (N=55; 78;6%) i biomedicine i zdravstva (N=49; 70%) značajno više (P<0;001) objavljuju u časopisima u Q1 i Q2 kvartilama. Autori iz područja društvenih i humanističkih znanosti više objavljuju u Q3 i Q4 te časopisima izvan baze podataka Scopus (N=57; 81;4%). Udio radova u otvorenom pristupu (N=107; 51%) približno je jednak udjelu u zatvorenom pristupu (N= 103; 49%) (P=0;7825). Za samoarhiviranje i dijeljenje radova znanstvenici su koristili platformu ResearchGate (N=77); ArXiv (N=32); Repozitorij UNIRI (N=15) i Crosbi (N=9). Od svih područja znanosti; analiziramo li radove s visokim stupnjem sklonosti samoarhiviranju i dijeljenju; prednjače autori iz područja prirodnih znanosti (N=21; 60%).Zaključak: Najveći stupanj sklonosti samoarhiviranju i dijeljenju rada pokazuju znanstvenici iz prirodnih znanosti. Nije uočena povezanost između SJR kvartila časopisa i sklonosti autora da samoarhivira ili podijeli svoj rad na otvorenoj platformi.------------------------------------------------Differences in openness and sharing of scientific papers at the University of RijekaAim: to determine differences in openness and sharing of scientific papers.Methods: We have analysed scientific papers from the Croatian Scientific Bibliography (CROSBI) from University of Rijeka (Croatia) in 4 fields (2017–2019) on a sample of 210 papers. The SciMago Journal Rank (SJR) quartiles were used as a metric. We have checked the presence of the full text in open access in 3 types of repositories (Repository UNIRI-Dabar; ArXiv; CROSBI) and on social academic network ResearchGate. Tendency of self-archiving and sharing with regard to the field of science was investigated.Results: Scientists in the field of natural sciences (N=55; 78.6%); and biomedicine and health (N = 49; 70%) publish more (P <0.001) in Q1 and Q2 journals. Social sciences and humanities authors publish mostly in Q3 and Q4 journals and in journals not indexed in the Scopus database (N =57; 81.4%). The proportion of open access papers (N=107; 51%) is equal to closed papers (N=103; 49%) (P=0;7825). Scientists used ResearchGate platform (N=77); ArXiv (N=32); UNIRI Repository (N=15) and CROSBI (N=9) for the self-archiving and sharing of papers. High degree of tendency for self-archiving and sharing was observed in the field of
目标:确定罗马大学科学著作开放和共享方面的差异。方法:分析罗马大学作者在克罗地亚科学图书馆(CROSBI)的4个领域(2017-2019)的210个工作岗位的科学著作。Kao metrički pokazatelj kvalitetečasopisa korišteni su kvartili SciMago期刊排名(SJR)。全文在三种类型的存储库(UNIRI存储库:Dabar、ArXiv和Crosbi)和ResearchGate社交学术网络的开放访问中的存在已经得到验证。在科学方面,自我协调和分担工作的程度是不同的。结果:自然科学科学家(N=55;78;6%)和生物医学与健康(N=49;70%)在第一季度和第二季度杂志上的报告显著更多(P<0.001)。社会和人文科学作者在第三季度和第四季度以及Scopus数据库之外的杂志上发表了更多文章(N=57;81;4%)。开放通道工程的份额(N=107;51%)大致等于封闭通道的份额(N=103;49%)(P=0;7825)。ResearchGate平台(N=77)用于自对齐和共享科学作品。ArXiv(N=32);UNIRI储存库(N=15)和Crosbi(N=9)。来自各个科学领域;李·拉多夫的维索基姆·斯图尔恩杰姆·斯克洛诺斯蒂·萨莫拉希维兰朱和迪耶延朱;来自自然科学领域的作者(N=21;60%)。结论:自然科学科学家表现出最高程度的自我协调和工作分担。在作者杂志的SJR区与在开放平台上自我组织或分享作品的倾向之间没有发现任何联系-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------里耶卡大学科学论文开放与共享的差异目的:确定科学论文开放和共享的差异。方法:我们分析了里耶卡大学(克罗地亚)克罗地亚科学文献目录(CROSBI)中4个领域(2017-2019)的科学论文,样本为210篇论文。SciMago期刊排名(SJR)四分位数被用作衡量标准。我们已经在3种类型的存储库(Repository UNIRI Dabar;ArXiv;CROSBI)和社交学术网络ResearchGate上检查了全文的开放访问情况。研究了科学领域自我存档和共享的趋势。结果:自然科学领域的科学家(N=55;78.6%);生物医学和健康(N=49;70%)在第一季度和第二季度期刊上发表的文章更多(P<0.001)。社会科学和人文学科的作者主要发表在第三季度和第四季度的期刊以及Scopus数据库中未编入索引的期刊上(N=57;81.4%)。开放获取论文的比例(N=107;51%)与封闭论文的比例相等(N=103;49%)(P=0;7825)。科学家使用ResearchGate平台(N=77);ArXiv(N=32);UNIRI知识库(N=15)和CROSBI(N=9),用于文件的自我归档和共享。自然科学领域存在高度的自我存档和共享倾向(N=21;60%)。SJR四分位数与作者在开放平台上自我存档或分享作品的倾向之间没有相关性。
{"title":"Razlike u otvorenosti i dijeljenju znanstvenih radova na Sveučilištu u Rijeci","authors":"I. Vrkić, Ivana Hebrang Grgić, J. Stojanovski, Ksenija Baždarić","doi":"10.37083/bosn.2020.25.198","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37083/bosn.2020.25.198","url":null,"abstract":"Cilj: utvrditi razlike u otvorenosti i dijeljenju znanstvenih radova na Sveučilištu u Rijeci.Metode: Analizirani su znanstveni radovi autora Sveučilišta u Rijeci iz Hrvatske znanstvene bibliografije (CROSBI) u 4 područja (2017.–2019.) na uzorku od 210 radova. Kao metrički pokazatelj kvalitete časopisa korišteni su kvartili SciMago Journal Rank (SJR). Provjerena je prisutnost cjelovitog teksta u otvorenom pristupu u 3 vrste repozitorija (Repozitorij UNIRI – Dabar; ArXiv; Crosbi) i na društvenoj akademskoj mreži ResearchGate. Istraženo je postojanje razlika u stupnju sklonosti samoarhiviranju i dijeljenju radova s obzirom na područje znanosti.Rezultati: Znanstvenici iz područja prirodnih znanosti (N=55; 78;6%) i biomedicine i zdravstva (N=49; 70%) značajno više (P<0;001) objavljuju u časopisima u Q1 i Q2 kvartilama. Autori iz područja društvenih i humanističkih znanosti više objavljuju u Q3 i Q4 te časopisima izvan baze podataka Scopus (N=57; 81;4%). Udio radova u otvorenom pristupu (N=107; 51%) približno je jednak udjelu u zatvorenom pristupu (N= 103; 49%) (P=0;7825). Za samoarhiviranje i dijeljenje radova znanstvenici su koristili platformu ResearchGate (N=77); ArXiv (N=32); Repozitorij UNIRI (N=15) i Crosbi (N=9). Od svih područja znanosti; analiziramo li radove s visokim stupnjem sklonosti samoarhiviranju i dijeljenju; prednjače autori iz područja prirodnih znanosti (N=21; 60%).Zaključak: Najveći stupanj sklonosti samoarhiviranju i dijeljenju rada pokazuju znanstvenici iz prirodnih znanosti. Nije uočena povezanost između SJR kvartila časopisa i sklonosti autora da samoarhivira ili podijeli svoj rad na otvorenoj platformi.------------------------------------------------Differences in openness and sharing of scientific papers at the University of RijekaAim: to determine differences in openness and sharing of scientific papers.Methods: We have analysed scientific papers from the Croatian Scientific Bibliography (CROSBI) from University of Rijeka (Croatia) in 4 fields (2017–2019) on a sample of 210 papers. The SciMago Journal Rank (SJR) quartiles were used as a metric. We have checked the presence of the full text in open access in 3 types of repositories (Repository UNIRI-Dabar; ArXiv; CROSBI) and on social academic network ResearchGate. Tendency of self-archiving and sharing with regard to the field of science was investigated.Results: Scientists in the field of natural sciences (N=55; 78.6%); and biomedicine and health (N = 49; 70%) publish more (P <0.001) in Q1 and Q2 journals. Social sciences and humanities authors publish mostly in Q3 and Q4 journals and in journals not indexed in the Scopus database (N =57; 81.4%). The proportion of open access papers (N=107; 51%) is equal to closed papers (N=103; 49%) (P=0;7825). Scientists used ResearchGate platform (N=77); ArXiv (N=32); UNIRI Repository (N=15) and CROSBI (N=9) for the self-archiving and sharing of papers. High degree of tendency for self-archiving and sharing was observed in the field of ","PeriodicalId":40324,"journal":{"name":"Bosniaca-Journal of the National and University Library of Bosnia and Herzegovina","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2020-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47963481","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}