Romanian academic circles became more interested in the study of Greek-Romanian relations towards the end of the nineteenth century and in the early twentieth. Demosthene Russo, a young Greek immigrant to Romania, educated at Constantinople, Athens, Berlin and Leipzig, profited from this favourable trend; he managed to establish at the University of Bucharest, after 1915, a powerful centre for Byzantine and Neohellenic research and to impose his own critical school, based upon a rigorous method, in direct competition with the line directed by the most highly acknowledged Romanian historian, Nicolae Iorga, a researcher with many achievements and famous initiatives in South-East European studies. In the interwar period Russo took on the responsibility for the education of his nephew and niece, Nestor and Ariadna Camariano, to whom he transmitted his appetite for detailed research and critical methods in his field and whom he left to continue his work. The three have deeply marked the study of the history of Hellenism; they distinguished themselves, sometimes under unfavourable circumstances, by their valuable scientific production, opening new directions in the cultural history of South-East Europe.
{"title":"A “Dynasty” of Hellenists in twentieth-century Bucharest: Demosthene Russo, Ariadna Camariano-Cioran and Nestor Camariano","authors":"Leonidas Rados","doi":"10.12681/HR.314","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12681/HR.314","url":null,"abstract":"Romanian academic circles became more interested in the study of Greek-Romanian relations towards the end of the nineteenth century and in the early twentieth. Demosthene Russo, a young Greek immigrant to Romania, educated at Constantinople, Athens, Berlin and Leipzig, profited from this favourable trend; he managed to establish at the University of Bucharest, after 1915, a powerful centre for Byzantine and Neohellenic research and to impose his own critical school, based upon a rigorous method, in direct competition with the line directed by the most highly acknowledged Romanian historian, Nicolae Iorga, a researcher with many achievements and famous initiatives in South-East European studies. In the interwar period Russo took on the responsibility for the education of his nephew and niece, Nestor and Ariadna Camariano, to whom he transmitted his appetite for detailed research and critical methods in his field and whom he left to continue his work. The three have deeply marked the study of the history of Hellenism; they distinguished themselves, sometimes under unfavourable circumstances, by their valuable scientific production, opening new directions in the cultural history of South-East Europe.","PeriodicalId":40645,"journal":{"name":"Historical Review-La Revue Historique","volume":"1 1","pages":"265-296"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2012-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77711435","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Ioannis Makriyannis: From History to Anthropology","authors":"T. Veremis","doi":"10.12681/HR.277","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12681/HR.277","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":40645,"journal":{"name":"Historical Review-La Revue Historique","volume":"1 1","pages":"85-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2012-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88918613","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper outlines the process of establishing the discipline of classical philology in Greece in the nineteenth century. During the period shortly before the Greek War of Independence, beyond the unique philological expertise of Adamantios Korais, there is additional evidence of the existence of a fledging academic discussion among younger scholars. A younger generation of scholars engaged in new methodological quests in the context of the German school of Alterthumswissenschaft. The urgent priorities of the new state and the fluidity of scholarly fields, as well as the close association of Greek philology with ideology, were some of the factors that determined the “Greek” study of antiquity during the first decades of the Greek state. The rise of classical philology as an organized discipline during the nineteenth century in Greece constitutes a process closely associated with the conditions under which the new state was constructed. This paper will touch upon the conditions created for the development of the discipline shortly before the Greek War of Independence, as well as on the factors that determined its course during the first decades of the Greek State.1 Although how to precisely define classical philology as an organized discipline is subject to debate, our basic frame of reference will be the period’s most advanced “school of philology”, the German school. According to one definition that can be deduced from an examination of this very school, the study of ancient literature began to be considered an organized “scientific” discipline from the moment the legitimization of its practitioners exceeded the boundaries of the act of teaching and no longer depended on the effect of their work upon a broad audience but rather on a specialized group of people.2 This turn towards Greek studies was a Pan-European phenomenon, which has been associated with the increasing power of the European middle 1 This text is part of my broader research into the creation of the discipline of classical philology and its progress during the nineteenth century in the context of the new Greek state. 2 Suzanne L. Marchand, Down from Olympus: Archaeology and Philhellenism in Germany, 1750-1970, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996, p. 23. The data that define the substance of this discipline in the context of Greece constitute a basic objective of my research. The Historical Review / La Revue Historique Institute for Neohellenic Research Volume VIII (2011) http://epublishing.ekt.gr | e-Publisher: EKT | Downloaded at 06/11/2018 14:59:59 | 118 Sophia Matthaiou class. In some instances, a classical education became the distinguishing characteristic of a rising urban class (England), while, in others, the vehicle that led to national integration (Germany).3 The European investment in Greek studies, combined with the birth of classicism, is, moreover, linked with the “emergence” of Greece in European thinking,4 as well as with the phenomenon of philhellenism
本文概述了19世纪希腊古典文献学学科的建立过程。在希腊独立战争前不久，除了Adamantios Korais独特的语言学专业知识之外，还有其他证据表明，年轻学者之间存在着一场羽化的学术讨论。年轻一代的学者在德国另类瑞士学派的背景下从事新的方法论探索。新国家的紧迫优先事项和学术领域的流动性，以及希腊文献学与意识形态的密切联系，是决定希腊国家最初几十年“希腊”古代研究的一些因素。古典文献学作为一门有组织的学科在19世纪的希腊兴起，构成了一个与新国家建立的条件密切相关的过程。本文将触及希腊独立战争前不久为这门学科的发展创造的条件，以及在希腊国家的头几十年里决定其进程的因素。1尽管如何准确地将古典文献学定义为一门有组织的学科还存在争议，但我们的基本参考框架将是这一时期最先进的“文献学学派”，即德国学派。根据对这一学派的考察可以推断出的一个定义，从古代文学研究的从业者的合法性超越教学行为的界限，不再依赖于他们的工作对广大读者的影响，而是依赖于一个专门的群体的那一刻起，古代文学研究就开始被认为是一门有组织的“科学”学科这种对希腊研究的转向是一种泛欧洲现象，它与欧洲中部日益增长的权力有关。本文是我对古典语言学学科的创立及其在19世纪新希腊国家背景下的进展的更广泛研究的一部分。2 Suzanne L. Marchand，《从奥林匹斯山下来:1750-1970年德国的考古学与Philhellenism》，普林斯顿:普林斯顿大学出版社，1996年，第23页。在希腊背景下定义这一学科实质的数据构成了我研究的基本目标。《历史评论》/ La Revue Historique Institute for Neohellenic Research卷八(2011)http://epublishing.ekt.gr |电子出版商:EKT |下载于2018年6月11日14:59:59 | 118 Sophia Matthaiou班。在某些情况下，古典教育成为新兴城市阶级的显著特征(英国)，而在另一些情况下，古典教育则成为导致民族融合的工具(德国)此外，欧洲对希腊研究的投入，加上古典主义的诞生，与希腊在欧洲思想中的“出现”(4)以及“亲希腊主义”(5)现象有关欧洲人把古希腊的过去与人类历史上的最高文明等同起来，对希腊民族国家的建立起了催化作用。因此，界定“希腊”古代研究的因素自然不同于欧洲人。我们知道，在整个奥斯曼占领时期，希腊学者都在研究古代作家，而这个国家有文化的居民与古代文学的联系从未断绝，因为它与教会文学一起，构成了当时任何类型的普通教育的基础。6 3克里斯托弗·斯特雷:《被改造的经典:1830-1960年英国的学校、大学和社会》，牛津:克拉伦登出版社，1998年，第7-113页;《从奥林匹斯山下来》，第3-35页。4 Nassia Giakovaki， Ευρώπη μ <s:2>变通ω e - λλ <s:2> δας。Mιακαμπήστηνευρωπαϊκήαυτοσυνείδηση,17ος-18οςαιώνας[欧洲通过希腊:欧洲自我意识的一个分水岭,seventeenth-eighteenth世纪],2006年雅典奥运会。关于法国知识界的知识分子发酵，请参见Georges Tolias, La m<s:1>戴利亚和La rouille。《现代巴黎人的形象》(1794-1815)，雅典:哈蒂尔-考夫曼出版社，1997年。露琪娅·德鲁丽娅:“…………”[philhellinism:一个自由和激进的运动]，在Vassilis Panayotopoulos(编)，Ιστορία του Νέου Ελληνισμού， 1770-2000[现代希腊历史，1770-2000]，雅典2003年，第二卷，第267286页，包含基本的参考书目。6 Ioannis Kalitsounakis,”H���β�ω����ω��������ώ����υδώ���E��άδ������������υ���ώ��ω������������”(解放以来的复兴希腊的古典研究),EπιστημονικήEπετηρίςτηςΦιλοσοφικήςΣχολήςτουΠανεπιστημίου的θηνών八世(1957 - 1958),页325 - 339;c . Th。 本文概述了19世纪希腊古典文献学学科的建立过程。在希腊独立战争前不久，除了Adamantios Korais独特的语言学专业知识之外，还有其他证据表明，年轻学者之间存在着一场羽化的学术讨论。年轻一代的学者在德国另类瑞士学派的背景下从事新的方法论探索。新国家的紧迫优先事项和学术领域的流动性，以及希腊文献学与意识形态的密切联系，是决定希腊国家最初几十年“希腊”古代研究的一些因素。古典文献学作为一门有组织的学科在19世纪的希腊兴起，构成了一个与新国家建立的条件密切相关的过程。本文将触及希腊独立战争前不久为这门学科的发展创造的条件，以及在希腊国家的头几十年里决定其进程的因素。1尽管如何准确地将古典文献学定义为一门有组织的学科还存在争议，但我们的基本参考框架将是这一时期最先进的“文献学学派”，即德国学派。根据对这一学派的考察可以推断出的一个定义，从古代文学研究的从业者的合法性超越教学行为的界限，不再依赖于他们的工作对广大读者的影响，而是依赖于一个专门的群体的那一刻起，古代文学研究就开始被认为是一门有组织的“科学”学科这种对希腊研究的转向是一种泛欧洲现象，它与欧洲中部日益增长的权力有关。本文是我对古典语言学学科的创立及其在19世纪新希腊国家背景下的进展的更广泛研究的一部分。2 Suzanne L. Marchand，《从奥林匹斯山下来:1750-1970年德国的考古学与Philhellenism》，普林斯顿:普林斯顿大学出版社，1996年，第23页。在希腊背景下定义这一学科实质的数据构成了我研究的基本目标。《历史评论》/ La Revue Historique Institute for Neohellenic Research卷八(2011)http://epublishing.ekt.gr |电子出版商:EKT |下载于2018/11/06 14:59:59 | 118 Sophia Matthaiou班。在某些情况下，古典教育成为新兴城市阶级的显著特征(英国)，而在另一些情况下，古典教育则成为导致民族融合的工具(德国)此外，欧洲对希腊研究的投入，加上古典主义的诞生，与希腊在欧洲思想中的“出现”(4)以及“亲希腊主义”(5)现象有关欧洲人把古希腊的过去与人类历史上的最高文明等同起来，对希腊民族国家的建立起了催化作用。因此，界定“希腊”古代研究的因素自然不同于欧洲人。我们知道，在整个奥斯曼占领时期，希腊学者都在研究古代作家，而这个国家有文化的居民与古代文学的联系从未断绝，因为它与教会文学一起，构成了当时任何类型的普通教育的基础。6 3克里斯托弗·斯特雷:《被改造的经典:1830-1960年英国的学校、大学和社会》，牛津:克拉伦登出版社，1998年，第7-113页;《从奥林匹斯山下来》，第3-35页。4 Nassia Giakovaki， Ευρώ
{"title":"Establishing the Discipline of Classical Philology in Nineteenth-century Greece","authors":"Sophia Matthaiou","doi":"10.12681/HR.279","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12681/HR.279","url":null,"abstract":"This paper outlines the process of establishing the discipline of classical philology in Greece in the nineteenth century. During the period shortly before the Greek War of Independence, beyond the unique philological expertise of Adamantios Korais, there is additional evidence of the existence of a fledging academic discussion among younger scholars. A younger generation of scholars engaged in new methodological quests in the context of the German school of Alterthumswissenschaft. The urgent priorities of the new state and the fluidity of scholarly fields, as well as the close association of Greek philology with ideology, were some of the factors that determined the “Greek” study of antiquity during the first decades of the Greek state. The rise of classical philology as an organized discipline during the nineteenth century in Greece constitutes a process closely associated with the conditions under which the new state was constructed. This paper will touch upon the conditions created for the development of the discipline shortly before the Greek War of Independence, as well as on the factors that determined its course during the first decades of the Greek State.1 Although how to precisely define classical philology as an organized discipline is subject to debate, our basic frame of reference will be the period’s most advanced “school of philology”, the German school. According to one definition that can be deduced from an examination of this very school, the study of ancient literature began to be considered an organized “scientific” discipline from the moment the legitimization of its practitioners exceeded the boundaries of the act of teaching and no longer depended on the effect of their work upon a broad audience but rather on a specialized group of people.2 This turn towards Greek studies was a Pan-European phenomenon, which has been associated with the increasing power of the European middle 1 This text is part of my broader research into the creation of the discipline of classical philology and its progress during the nineteenth century in the context of the new Greek state. 2 Suzanne L. Marchand, Down from Olympus: Archaeology and Philhellenism in Germany, 1750-1970, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996, p. 23. The data that define the substance of this discipline in the context of Greece constitute a basic objective of my research. The Historical Review / La Revue Historique Institute for Neohellenic Research Volume VIII (2011) http://epublishing.ekt.gr | e-Publisher: EKT | Downloaded at 06/11/2018 14:59:59 | 118 Sophia Matthaiou class. In some instances, a classical education became the distinguishing characteristic of a rising urban class (England), while, in others, the vehicle that led to national integration (Germany).3 The European investment in Greek studies, combined with the birth of classicism, is, moreover, linked with the “emergence” of Greece in European thinking,4 as well as with the phenomenon of philhellenism","PeriodicalId":40645,"journal":{"name":"Historical Review-La Revue Historique","volume":"276 1","pages":"117-148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2012-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72747897","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
: The story of the Epirote Society, which was established in Athens in 1906, adds colour to the broader mosaic of irredentism. The account of the Society’s past, especially of its Ioannina branch, given by one of its participants omits several inner aspects and does not offer a comparative perspective. The aim of this paper is to place the history of the Society in a more general context and offer a better understanding of the actions and practices of this particular agent of irredentism. The course that was followed by Greek irredentism in Ottoman Epirus was not an exception but rather a rule in the Balkans at the time. The paper examines critically the Society’s agenda and illustrates certain issues, such as social banditry and the clash between communalism and nationalism, in the light of contemporary academic findings. The other-definition of the Greek nation-building process in the area towards the Albanian national “awakening” is also discussed, while emphasis is placed on the interconnection of these processes with the agrarian question.
{"title":"Nuances of Irredentism: The Epirote Society of Athens (1906-1912)","authors":"Spyros Ploumidis","doi":"10.12681/HR.280","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12681/HR.280","url":null,"abstract":": The story of the Epirote Society, which was established in Athens in 1906, adds colour to the broader mosaic of irredentism. The account of the Society’s past, especially of its Ioannina branch, given by one of its participants omits several inner aspects and does not offer a comparative perspective. The aim of this paper is to place the history of the Society in a more general context and offer a better understanding of the actions and practices of this particular agent of irredentism. The course that was followed by Greek irredentism in Ottoman Epirus was not an exception but rather a rule in the Balkans at the time. The paper examines critically the Society’s agenda and illustrates certain issues, such as social banditry and the clash between communalism and nationalism, in the light of contemporary academic findings. The other-definition of the Greek nation-building process in the area towards the Albanian national “awakening” is also discussed, while emphasis is placed on the interconnection of these processes with the agrarian question.","PeriodicalId":40645,"journal":{"name":"Historical Review-La Revue Historique","volume":"25 1","pages":"149-177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2012-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84652175","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
RésumÉ: En juin 1827 éclatait à Genève une polémique à la suite de la publication d’un article de Frédéric Lullin de Châteauvieux, aristocrate genevois et chroniqueur politique à ses heures. Dans ces “Considérations sur l’état actuel de la Grèce”, Lullin s’en prend violemment aux chefs militaires grecs et à leur esprit de désunion. Quelques jours plus tard, dans un opuscule d’ Observations , Jean-Guillaume de Lunzi (qui réside à Genève de 1827 à 1834) réfute point par point les affirmations de Lullin. Il attaque également le docteur Louis-André Gosse, délégué du comité philhellénique de Genève, arrivé depuis peu dans la tourmente politique de Nauplie et dont les rapports envoyés à Jean-Gabriel Eynard, souvent reproduits dans la presse locale, sont la source de Lullin. Nous avons cherché à dégager les points de vue des trois parties: Gosse, qui consacre deux années intenses de sa vie à la cause grecque; Lullin
摘要:1827年6月，日内瓦贵族、政治专栏作家frederic Lullin de chateauvieux发表了一篇文章，引发了一场争论。在这些“对希腊现状的思考”中，卢林猛烈抨击了希腊的军事领导人和他们的不团结精神。几天后，让-纪尧姆·德·伦齐(1827年至1834年住在日内瓦)在一份简短的观察报告中，一点一点地驳斥了卢林的主张。他还攻击了日内瓦philhellenico委员会的代表louis - andre Gosse博士，他最近在Nauplie的政治动荡中到达，他寄给Jean-Gabriel Eynard的报告，经常在当地媒体上转载，是Lullin的来源。我们试图阐明三个部分的观点:高斯，他把他生命中紧张的两年奉献给了希腊事业;有视力
{"title":"Une polémique chez les philhellènes à Genève en 1827. Jean-Guillaume de Lunzi et Frédéric Lullin de Châteauvieux","authors":"M. Bouvier-Bron","doi":"10.12681/HR.274","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12681/HR.274","url":null,"abstract":"RésumÉ: En juin 1827 éclatait à Genève une polémique à la suite de la publication d’un article de Frédéric Lullin de Châteauvieux, aristocrate genevois et chroniqueur politique à ses heures. Dans ces “Considérations sur l’état actuel de la Grèce”, Lullin s’en prend violemment aux chefs militaires grecs et à leur esprit de désunion. Quelques jours plus tard, dans un opuscule d’ Observations , Jean-Guillaume de Lunzi (qui réside à Genève de 1827 à 1834) réfute point par point les affirmations de Lullin. Il attaque également le docteur Louis-André Gosse, délégué du comité philhellénique de Genève, arrivé depuis peu dans la tourmente politique de Nauplie et dont les rapports envoyés à Jean-Gabriel Eynard, souvent reproduits dans la presse locale, sont la source de Lullin. Nous avons cherché à dégager les points de vue des trois parties: Gosse, qui consacre deux années intenses de sa vie à la cause grecque; Lullin","PeriodicalId":40645,"journal":{"name":"Historical Review-La Revue Historique","volume":"373 1","pages":"7-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2012-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84931839","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
: T is article argues that, after the fall of Constantinople, the religious belief system of the Orthodox community legitimized and, at the same time, challenged the Ottoman status quo. Te prophetic and apocalyptic beliefs of the subjugated community were largely responsible for the ambivalence. Tese beliefs entertained subversive ideas on a communal level that counterbalanced the feelings of accommodation with Ottoman rule. In the age of revolution, the prophetic and apocalyptic beliefs under consideration interacted with the ideals of nationalism, producing noticeable political results. Te first nationalistic movement to erupt in South-East Europe, the Greek one, took advantage of this old set of collective beliefs in order to increase the social dissemination of its own modern and secular political ends. Te article first traces the course of a medieval tradition of prophecy of religio-political character, which existed as part of the general religious framework of Orthodox belief in the Eastern Roman Empire. It then goes on to highlight the social function of the tradition after the fall of Constantinople, as a repertoire of shared mythic beliefs with status reversal properties assuring the faithful that, eventually, the condition of collective subjection would be reversed. Finally, the age of modernity is considered, all the while arguing that the tradition proved advantageous to Greek nationalism insofar as it encapsulated collective beliefs which, thanks to their status reversal meanings and their intrinsic capability for reinterpretation, were useful for making the Orthodox masses more receptive to the nationalist call to arms.
{"title":"Oracular Prophecy and the Politics of Toppling Ottoman Rule in South-East Europe","authors":"M. Hatzopoulos","doi":"10.12681/HR.278","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12681/HR.278","url":null,"abstract":": T is article argues that, after the fall of Constantinople, the religious belief system of the Orthodox community legitimized and, at the same time, challenged the Ottoman status quo. Te prophetic and apocalyptic beliefs of the subjugated community were largely responsible for the ambivalence. Tese beliefs entertained subversive ideas on a communal level that counterbalanced the feelings of accommodation with Ottoman rule. In the age of revolution, the prophetic and apocalyptic beliefs under consideration interacted with the ideals of nationalism, producing noticeable political results. Te first nationalistic movement to erupt in South-East Europe, the Greek one, took advantage of this old set of collective beliefs in order to increase the social dissemination of its own modern and secular political ends. Te article first traces the course of a medieval tradition of prophecy of religio-political character, which existed as part of the general religious framework of Orthodox belief in the Eastern Roman Empire. It then goes on to highlight the social function of the tradition after the fall of Constantinople, as a repertoire of shared mythic beliefs with status reversal properties assuring the faithful that, eventually, the condition of collective subjection would be reversed. Finally, the age of modernity is considered, all the while arguing that the tradition proved advantageous to Greek nationalism insofar as it encapsulated collective beliefs which, thanks to their status reversal meanings and their intrinsic capability for reinterpretation, were useful for making the Orthodox masses more receptive to the nationalist call to arms.","PeriodicalId":40645,"journal":{"name":"Historical Review-La Revue Historique","volume":"23 1","pages":"95-116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2012-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83267464","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：