Dieser Artikel beleuchtet das von Samuel Quiccheberg im Jahre 1565 am Münchner Hofe aufgestellte Traktat für die Organisation und Ordnung einer Kunstkammer aus einer neuen Perspektive, die als Ankerpunkt für Museen im Postdigitalen dienen können. Ein besonderer Fokus wird hierbei auf die bereits von Quiccheberg identifizierten Qualitäten der Ordnung von Systemen und Räumen gelegt, die auch in jüngster Vergangenheit von Philosophen wie Niklas Luhmann und Michel Foucault konkretisiert wurden. Der Artikel schlägt damit eine Brücke zwischen dem ersten museumstheoretischen Traktat und modernen Theorien aus der System- und Raumwissenschaft, um einen Ansatz für die Definition und das Verständnis des Museums im postdigitalen Zeitalter zu schaffen.
{"title":"Espaces et systèmes des Inscriptiones de Samuel Quiccheberg, point d’ancrage du musée du xxi e siècle ?","authors":"Jana Raspotnig, Antoinette Maget Dominicé","doi":"10.3917/eger.310.0163","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3917/eger.310.0163","url":null,"abstract":"Dieser Artikel beleuchtet das von Samuel Quiccheberg im Jahre 1565 am Münchner Hofe aufgestellte Traktat für die Organisation und Ordnung einer Kunstkammer aus einer neuen Perspektive, die als Ankerpunkt für Museen im Postdigitalen dienen können. Ein besonderer Fokus wird hierbei auf die bereits von Quiccheberg identifizierten Qualitäten der Ordnung von Systemen und Räumen gelegt, die auch in jüngster Vergangenheit von Philosophen wie Niklas Luhmann und Michel Foucault konkretisiert wurden. Der Artikel schlägt damit eine Brücke zwischen dem ersten museumstheoretischen Traktat und modernen Theorien aus der System- und Raumwissenschaft, um einen Ansatz für die Definition und das Verständnis des Museums im postdigitalen Zeitalter zu schaffen.","PeriodicalId":41323,"journal":{"name":"ETUDES GERMANIQUES","volume":"159 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136238008","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Young hegelianism has been the crux of conceptual creations. Among the concepts showcased by this school of thought, one, developed by Moses Hess and Karl Marx, was Zusammenwirken: “acting together”. For both thinkers, this concept, together with those of reciprocal action and activity exchange, was a tool to think social action and society itself. This essay aims at figuring out how specific Hess’s conception of “acting together” was. It purports to define this concept by taking into consideration that Hess used it in a two-fold enterprise: developing both a philosophy of history and a representation of the present as the locus of a potential shift from a middleman-and-mediator-based “acting together” to a consciously and self-organized one.
{"title":"L’« agir ensemble » ( Zusammenwirken ) chez Moses Hess et Karl Marx","authors":"Franck Fischbach","doi":"10.3917/eger.311.0363","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3917/eger.311.0363","url":null,"abstract":"Young hegelianism has been the crux of conceptual creations. Among the concepts showcased by this school of thought, one, developed by Moses Hess and Karl Marx, was Zusammenwirken: “acting together”. For both thinkers, this concept, together with those of reciprocal action and activity exchange, was a tool to think social action and society itself. This essay aims at figuring out how specific Hess’s conception of “acting together” was. It purports to define this concept by taking into consideration that Hess used it in a two-fold enterprise: developing both a philosophy of history and a representation of the present as the locus of a potential shift from a middleman-and-mediator-based “acting together” to a consciously and self-organized one.","PeriodicalId":41323,"journal":{"name":"ETUDES GERMANIQUES","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136238143","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This essay underscores the relevance of young Hegelianism by analyzing the reception of the Hegelian system by its contemporaries. Starting from the example of the concept of recognition, it seeks to explain why this concept, which is held today for one of Hegel’s foremost theoretical contributions, went unnoticed or was not deemed worthy of interest among authors who yet knew that system well. The article first surveys the meanings of the term Anerkennung in Hegel’s and the young Hegelians’ time with reference to Adelung’s and to the Grimm brothers’ dictionaries. In two further developments, it explores the uses of the term Anerkennung in Feurbach’s and Bruno Bauer’s works.
{"title":"La non-réception du concept hégélien de reconnaissance chez les Jeunes hégéliens","authors":"Jean-Philippe Deranty, Emmanuel Renault","doi":"10.3917/eger.311.0425","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3917/eger.311.0425","url":null,"abstract":"This essay underscores the relevance of young Hegelianism by analyzing the reception of the Hegelian system by its contemporaries. Starting from the example of the concept of recognition, it seeks to explain why this concept, which is held today for one of Hegel’s foremost theoretical contributions, went unnoticed or was not deemed worthy of interest among authors who yet knew that system well. The article first surveys the meanings of the term Anerkennung in Hegel’s and the young Hegelians’ time with reference to Adelung’s and to the Grimm brothers’ dictionaries. In two further developments, it explores the uses of the term Anerkennung in Feurbach’s and Bruno Bauer’s works.","PeriodicalId":41323,"journal":{"name":"ETUDES GERMANIQUES","volume":"158 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136238513","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Sisyphe et le surhomme","authors":"Gérald Stieg","doi":"10.3917/eger.311.0485","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3917/eger.311.0485","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41323,"journal":{"name":"ETUDES GERMANIQUES","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136238150","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"La nation chez Bruno Bauer entre social et politique. Particulier, universel et singulier","authors":"Éric Dufour","doi":"10.3917/eger.311.0385","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3917/eger.311.0385","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41323,"journal":{"name":"ETUDES GERMANIQUES","volume":"158 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136238152","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
For almost half a century, Martin Buber collected, translated and edited Hasidic stories. This impressive body of work contributed to the knowledge and recognition of Hasidism in European culture. The revelation of this rich literary heritage played an important cultural and political role in the Renaissance of the Jewish culture in the 20th century. Buber was equally criticised for his romantic, aestheticised and idealised view of Hasidism. Buber rewrote the Hasidic stories by transforming them into Volksmärchen similar to German popular literature. He also tends to extract them from their original linguistic and religious context, omitting their Kabbalistic dimension, as in the stories of the Baal Shem Tov and Nahman of Bratslav
{"title":"Collecter, traduire et réécrire. Martin Buber et les récits hassidiques","authors":"Jean Baumgarten","doi":"10.3917/eger.309.0019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3917/eger.309.0019","url":null,"abstract":"For almost half a century, Martin Buber collected, translated and edited Hasidic stories. This impressive body of work contributed to the knowledge and recognition of Hasidism in European culture. The revelation of this rich literary heritage played an important cultural and political role in the Renaissance of the Jewish culture in the 20th century. Buber was equally criticised for his romantic, aestheticised and idealised view of Hasidism. Buber rewrote the Hasidic stories by transforming them into Volksmärchen similar to German popular literature. He also tends to extract them from their original linguistic and religious context, omitting their Kabbalistic dimension, as in the stories of the Baal Shem Tov and Nahman of Bratslav","PeriodicalId":41323,"journal":{"name":"ETUDES GERMANIQUES","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136238154","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The opposition between these two fundamental categories of theatre aesthetics is based on Aristotle, who gives primacy to Hedone, and on Friedrich Schiller, who proposes an idealistic synthesis of the two. During his Scandinavian exile, Brecht addressed this dilemma in his essay Vergnügungstheater oder Lehrtheater? (1935/1936) and later in his very Aristotelian Prologue to Kleines Organon für das Theater (1949). His view of social reality as influenced by the process of consciousness affecting the role of the audience lends a new basis to this relationship, which changes with the historical situation. “Shifts of emphasis” (Akzentverschiebungen) on the one hand, and a ridge line on the other: These are the attempts to do justice to what the Diary (28 December 1952) defines as the means of education and the end of art.
戏剧美学的这两个基本范畴之间的对立是基于亚里士多德，他认为Hedone是首要的，以及弗里德里希·席勒，他提出了两者的理想主义综合。在斯堪的纳维亚流亡期间，布莱希特在他的文章《Vergnügungstheater oder Lehrtheater?》(1935/1936)，后来又出现在他非常亚里士多德式的《克莱因·奥加农的戏剧序曲》(1949)中。他认为社会现实受意识过程的影响，影响着观众的角色，这为这种随历史形势而变化的关系提供了新的依据。“重点转移”一方面(Akzentverschiebungen)，另一方面是一条山脊线:这些都是对日记(1952年12月28日)定义为教育手段和艺术目的的正义的尝试。
{"title":"Hedonè et paideia . Le théâtre de Brecht ou le plaisir sauvegardé","authors":"Jean-Marie Valentin","doi":"10.3917/eger.309.0101","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3917/eger.309.0101","url":null,"abstract":"The opposition between these two fundamental categories of theatre aesthetics is based on Aristotle, who gives primacy to Hedone, and on Friedrich Schiller, who proposes an idealistic synthesis of the two. During his Scandinavian exile, Brecht addressed this dilemma in his essay Vergnügungstheater oder Lehrtheater? (1935/1936) and later in his very Aristotelian Prologue to Kleines Organon für das Theater (1949). His view of social reality as influenced by the process of consciousness affecting the role of the audience lends a new basis to this relationship, which changes with the historical situation. “Shifts of emphasis” (Akzentverschiebungen) on the one hand, and a ridge line on the other: These are the attempts to do justice to what the Diary (28 December 1952) defines as the means of education and the end of art.","PeriodicalId":41323,"journal":{"name":"ETUDES GERMANIQUES","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136238522","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The article explores the technoscientific ambitions of an overlooked movement within Swedish history at the end of the Great Northern War. This movement, which the author calls “new boreal science”, roughly lasted from 1710 to 1720. The article explores its semantics, networks, goals and pioneers, and contextualises it within broader discourses on the North during the period 1620-1720. In this way, the article shows how the development of Swedish practical science became inseparable from a rich set of neo-Latin discourses on the North, supported by gothicist-rudbeckian historiography. Both wished to challenge long-lasting narratives about Scandinavia as an uncivilized, barbaric periphery, in favour of a bold revisionist narrative which placed Sweden at the centre of Western civilization. The article provides an overview of these discourses and shows how they pictured the North as a new abode for knowledge brought by the “Boreal Muses”. More broadly, the article highlights the interdependance of discourses on the North and Swedish science during the Age of Great Power. It also sheds light on overlooked scientific ambitions at the end of the Swedish Empire, and expands current understandings about early modern forms of borealism.
{"title":"Musis Borealibus : science boréale et discours sur le Nord, 1620-1720","authors":"V. Piazza","doi":"10.3917/EGER.301.0065","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3917/EGER.301.0065","url":null,"abstract":"The article explores the technoscientific ambitions of an overlooked movement within Swedish history at the end of the Great Northern War. This movement, which the author calls “new boreal science”, roughly lasted from 1710 to 1720. The article explores its semantics, networks, goals and pioneers, and contextualises it within broader discourses on the North during the period 1620-1720. In this way, the article shows how the development of Swedish practical science became inseparable from a rich set of neo-Latin discourses on the North, supported by gothicist-rudbeckian historiography. Both wished to challenge long-lasting narratives about Scandinavia as an uncivilized, barbaric periphery, in favour of a bold revisionist narrative which placed Sweden at the centre of Western civilization. The article provides an overview of these discourses and shows how they pictured the North as a new abode for knowledge brought by the “Boreal Muses”. More broadly, the article highlights the interdependance of discourses on the North and Swedish science during the Age of Great Power. It also sheds light on overlooked scientific ambitions at the end of the Swedish Empire, and expands current understandings about early modern forms of borealism.","PeriodicalId":41323,"journal":{"name":"ETUDES GERMANIQUES","volume":"1 1","pages":"65-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46013135","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：