{"title":"Building and Leveraging Soft Skills in Professional Practice.","authors":"Chris Alderman","doi":"10.4140/TCP.n.2024.1","DOIUrl":"10.4140/TCP.n.2024.1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41635,"journal":{"name":"Senior Care Pharmacist","volume":"39 1","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139075409","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
For more than half a century, there has been controversy and conflict over using psychotropic medications ("psychotropics") as strategies to modulate behavior, enhance mood, and address cognitive issues for nursing home residents. The current situation reflects a long history of investigation, reports, discussions, government and professional activity, and other attempted improvement. Although attention has focused primarily on the use of antipsychotics, particularly to manage symptoms associated with dementia, there are much broader issues. The use of all psychotropics has arguably been challenging and inconsistent. Although antipsychotic use in nursing homes has been reduced substantially, many controversies and concerns remain, such as the continuing significant use of other psychotropics. It is tempting to conclude that efforts to reduce the use of these medications might have been deliberately stymied, and that more drastic-if not coercive-measures are needed to correct these issues. However, many other compelling considerations must be defined accurately and addressed. Further improvement in the current situation requires reconsidering some current beliefs and approaches. A pause and reopening of meaningful discussion is needed. This 3-part series (in this and the next 2 issues of The Senior Care Pharmacist) will examine the history of the issues (this month), various perspectives on the issues (part 2), and lessons and recommended approaches for the future (part 3).
{"title":"Antipsychotics in Perspective: Past, Present, and Future.","authors":"Steven A Levenson","doi":"10.4140/TCP.n.2024.5","DOIUrl":"10.4140/TCP.n.2024.5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For more than half a century, there has been controversy and conflict over using psychotropic medications (\"psychotropics\") as strategies to modulate behavior, enhance mood, and address cognitive issues for nursing home residents. The current situation reflects a long history of investigation, reports, discussions, government and professional activity, and other attempted improvement. Although attention has focused primarily on the use of antipsychotics, particularly to manage symptoms associated with dementia, there are much broader issues. The use of all psychotropics has arguably been challenging and inconsistent. Although antipsychotic use in nursing homes has been reduced substantially, many controversies and concerns remain, such as the continuing significant use of other psychotropics. It is tempting to conclude that efforts to reduce the use of these medications might have been deliberately stymied, and that more drastic-if not coercive-measures are needed to correct these issues. However, many other compelling considerations must be defined accurately and addressed. Further improvement in the current situation requires reconsidering some current beliefs and approaches. A pause and reopening of meaningful discussion is needed. This 3-part series (in this and the next 2 issues of <i>The Senior Care Pharmacist</i>) will examine the history of the issues (this month), various perspectives on the issues (part 2), and lessons and recommended approaches for the future (part 3).</p>","PeriodicalId":41635,"journal":{"name":"Senior Care Pharmacist","volume":"39 1","pages":"5-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139075407","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background Older people have higher risk of experiencing medication-related problems (MRPs), leading to increased morbidity, health care use, and mortality. Few studies have examined the pathway between limited English proficiency (LEP) among older people and health service use through MRPs. Objective This study aimed to explore the association of LEP among Latino older people with MRPs and their relationship to emergency room (ER) visits. Methods Researchers used secondary enrollment data from a community medication program for older people (N = 180). Researchers conducted linear regression to examine the relationship between ethnicity/English proficiency and MRPs, and logistic regression to explore the association between MRPs and ER visits. Generalized structural equation modeling (GSEM) with bootstrapping was used to test the indirect effect between LEP Latino through MRPs to ER visits. Results The sample included 70% non-Latino participants, 12% English-speaking Latinos, and 18% LEP Latinos. Analysis LEP Latinos were associated with having 3.4 more MRPs than non-Latino participants, after controlling for covariates. Additionally, each additional MRP was associated with a 10% increased probability of having an ER visit. The GSEM results illustrated there was a significant indirect effect between LEP through MRPs to ER visits (β = 0.27, 95% CI 0.07-0.61). Conclusion Though LEP was not directly related to increased ER visits, it may have inhibited the ability of Latinos to read and understand medication instructions, contributing to their elevated risk of experiencing MRPs, thus indirectly increasing potential risks of having ER visits.
{"title":"Impact of Limited English Proficiency on Medication-Related Problems and Emergency Room Visits Among Community-Dwelling Older People.","authors":"Yujun Zhu, Susan Enguidanos","doi":"10.4140/TCP.n.2024.14","DOIUrl":"10.4140/TCP.n.2024.14","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b> Older people have higher risk of experiencing medication-related problems (MRPs), leading to increased morbidity, health care use, and mortality. Few studies have examined the pathway between limited English proficiency (LEP) among older people and health service use through MRPs. <b>Objective</b> This study aimed to explore the association of LEP among Latino older people with MRPs and their relationship to emergency room (ER) visits. <b>Methods</b> Researchers used secondary enrollment data from a community medication program for older people (N = 180). Researchers conducted linear regression to examine the relationship between ethnicity/English proficiency and MRPs, and logistic regression to explore the association between MRPs and ER visits. Generalized structural equation modeling (GSEM) with bootstrapping was used to test the indirect effect between LEP Latino through MRPs to ER visits. <b>Results</b> The sample included 70% non-Latino participants, 12% English-speaking Latinos, and 18% LEP Latinos. Analysis LEP Latinos were associated with having 3.4 more MRPs than non-Latino participants, after controlling for covariates. Additionally, each additional MRP was associated with a 10% increased probability of having an ER visit. The GSEM results illustrated there was a significant indirect effect between LEP through MRPs to ER visits (β = 0.27, 95% CI 0.07-0.61). <b>Conclusion</b> Though LEP was not directly related to increased ER visits, it may have inhibited the ability of Latinos to read and understand medication instructions, contributing to their elevated risk of experiencing MRPs, thus indirectly increasing potential risks of having ER visits.</p>","PeriodicalId":41635,"journal":{"name":"Senior Care Pharmacist","volume":"39 1","pages":"14-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139075411","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Genevieve Hale, Valerie Marcellus, Tina Benny, Cynthia Moreau, Elaina Rosario, Alexandra Perez
Introduction Affordability of insulin products has become a concern in the past several years as the average price of various insulin products has increased. While awaiting legislation at the federal level that would address issues leading to high insulin costs, providers may have shifted prescribing practices to prescribe the lowest-priced insulin products to achieve patients' treatment goals. Objective To compare the prevalence of hypoglycemic events between patients receiving lower-cost neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH)-containing human insulins and higher-cost long-acting insulin analogs in Medicare Part D enrollees within a management services organization, as well as assessing glycemic control and changes in body mass index. Methods This was a multicenter, retrospective study conducted at three primary care clinics. The co-primary outcomes were percent difference of documented mild and severe hypoglycemic events between individuals receiving NPH-containing human insulin and long-acting insulin. Results A total of 72 patients met inclusion criteria and were receiving NPH-containing human insulins or the long-acting insulin analogs, 15 and 57 patients, respectively. Severe hypoglycemic events occurred in 3.5% vs 0% of the long-acting insulin analog and NPH-containing human insulin group, respectively (P = 0.999). Mild hypoglycemic episodes were experienced by 31.6% versus 33.3% of long-acting insulin analog and NPH, respectively (P = 0.539). For secondary outcomes, no difference was observed in glycemic control outcomes across insulin groups. Conclusion Among Medicare Part D patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, the use of NPH-containing human insulins was not associated with an increased risk of mild or severe hypoglycemia-related episodes or reduced glycemic control compared with long-acting insulin. Study findings suggest that lower-cost, NPH-containing human insulins may be an alternative to higher-cost, long-acting insulin analogs.
{"title":"Real-World Analysis of Long-Acting and NPH-Containing Insulins on Glycemic Control.","authors":"Genevieve Hale, Valerie Marcellus, Tina Benny, Cynthia Moreau, Elaina Rosario, Alexandra Perez","doi":"10.4140/TCP.n.2024.42","DOIUrl":"10.4140/TCP.n.2024.42","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b> Affordability of insulin products has become a concern in the past several years as the average price of various insulin products has increased. While awaiting legislation at the federal level that would address issues leading to high insulin costs, providers may have shifted prescribing practices to prescribe the lowest-priced insulin products to achieve patients' treatment goals. <b>Objective</b> To compare the prevalence of hypoglycemic events between patients receiving lower-cost neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH)-containing human insulins and higher-cost long-acting insulin analogs in Medicare Part D enrollees within a management services organization, as well as assessing glycemic control and changes in body mass index. <b>Methods</b> This was a multicenter, retrospective study conducted at three primary care clinics. The co-primary outcomes were percent difference of documented mild and severe hypoglycemic events between individuals receiving NPH-containing human insulin and long-acting insulin. <b>Results</b> A total of 72 patients met inclusion criteria and were receiving NPH-containing human insulins or the long-acting insulin analogs, 15 and 57 patients, respectively. Severe hypoglycemic events occurred in 3.5% vs 0% of the long-acting insulin analog and NPH-containing human insulin group, respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.999). Mild hypoglycemic episodes were experienced by 31.6% versus 33.3% of long-acting insulin analog and NPH, respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.539). For secondary outcomes, no difference was observed in glycemic control outcomes across insulin groups. <b>Conclusion</b> Among Medicare Part D patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, the use of NPH-containing human insulins was not associated with an increased risk of mild or severe hypoglycemia-related episodes or reduced glycemic control compared with long-acting insulin. Study findings suggest that lower-cost, NPH-containing human insulins may be an alternative to higher-cost, long-acting insulin analogs.</p>","PeriodicalId":41635,"journal":{"name":"Senior Care Pharmacist","volume":"39 1","pages":"42-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139075413","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In this final column by Paul Baldwin, there is discussion of the disease state specialties that pharmacists must be familiar with in their daily work. Chronic kidney disease (CKD), including end-stage renal disease (ESRD), has been the subject of much state and federal spending over several years. Government support has gone beyond health-program support and has extended to economic support as well.
{"title":"Federal and State Programs and Resources for Chronic Kidney Disease.","authors":"Paul Baldwin","doi":"10.4140/TCP.n.2023.524","DOIUrl":"10.4140/TCP.n.2023.524","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this final column by Paul Baldwin, there is discussion of the disease state specialties that pharmacists must be familiar with in their daily work. Chronic kidney disease (CKD), including end-stage renal disease (ESRD), has been the subject of much state and federal spending over several years. Government support has gone beyond health-program support and has extended to economic support as well.</p>","PeriodicalId":41635,"journal":{"name":"Senior Care Pharmacist","volume":"38 12","pages":"524-525"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138470960","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Michelle Nguyen, Manju T Beier, Diana N Louden, Darla Spears, Shelly L Gray
Background Polypharmacy is common among older people and may be associated with adverse drug events (ADEs) and poor health outcomes. Pharmacists are well-positioned to reduce polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medications. Objective The objective of this narrative review was to summarize the results from randomized-controlled trials that evaluated pharmacist-led interventions with the goal or effect to deprescribe medications in older individuals. Data Sources We searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL Complete, APA PsycInfo, Web of Science Core Collection, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Data Synthesis Of the 25 studies included, the interventions were conducted in nursing facilities (n = 8), outpatient/community dwellings (n = 8), or community pharmacies (n = 9). Interventions were categorized as comprehensive medication reviews (n = 10), comprehensive medication reviews with pharmacist follow-up (n = 11), and educational interventions provided to patients and/or providers (n = 4). Pharmacist-led interventions had a beneficial effect on 22 out of 32 total medication-related outcomes (eg, number of medications, potentially inappropriate medications, or discontinuation). Most (n = 18) studies reported no evidence of an effect for other outcomes such as health care use, mortality, patient-centered outcomes (falls, cognition, function, quality of life), and ADEs. Discussion Interventions led to improvement in 69% of the medication-related outcomes examined across study settings. Five studies measured ADEs with none accounting for adverse drug-withdrawal events. Large well-designed studies that are powered to find an effect on patient-centered outcomes are needed. Conclusion Pharmacist-led interventions had a significant beneficial effect on medication-related outcomes. There was little evidence of benefit on other outcomes.
背景:多种用药在老年人中很常见,可能与药物不良事件(ADEs)和不良健康结局有关。药剂师可以很好地减少多药和可能不适当的药物。这篇叙述性综述的目的是总结随机对照试验的结果,这些试验评估了药师主导的干预措施的目标或效果,以减少老年人的药物处方。我们检索了Medline, Embase, CINAHL Complete, APA PsycInfo, Web of Science Core Collection和Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials。纳入的25项研究中,干预措施在护理机构(n = 8)、门诊/社区住宅(n = 8)或社区药房(n = 9)进行。干预措施分为综合药物评价(n = 10)、综合药物评价与药剂师随访(n = 11)、综合药物评价与药剂师随访(n = 11)。向患者和/或提供者提供教育干预(n = 4)。药师主导的干预对32项药物相关结果中的22项(例如,药物数量、可能不适当的药物或停药)有有益影响。大多数(n = 18)研究报告没有证据表明对其他结果有影响,如医疗保健使用、死亡率、以患者为中心的结果(跌倒、认知、功能、生活质量)和ADEs。在所有研究环境中,干预措施改善了69%的药物相关结果。五项研究测量了ade,但没有考虑到不良药物戒断事件。需要设计良好的大型研究来发现对以患者为中心的结果的影响。结论药师主导的干预措施对药物相关结局有显著的有益影响。几乎没有证据表明它对其他结果有好处。
{"title":"The Effect of Pharmacist-Initiated Deprescribing Interventions in Older People: A Narrative Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Michelle Nguyen, Manju T Beier, Diana N Louden, Darla Spears, Shelly L Gray","doi":"10.4140/TCP.n.2023.506","DOIUrl":"10.4140/TCP.n.2023.506","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b> Polypharmacy is common among older people and may be associated with adverse drug events (ADEs) and poor health outcomes. Pharmacists are well-positioned to reduce polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medications. <b>Objective</b> The objective of this narrative review was to summarize the results from randomized-controlled trials that evaluated pharmacist-led interventions with the goal or effect to deprescribe medications in older individuals. <b>Data Sources</b> We searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL Complete, APA PsycInfo, Web of Science Core Collection, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. <b>Data Synthesis</b> Of the 25 studies included, the interventions were conducted in nursing facilities (n = 8), outpatient/community dwellings (n = 8), or community pharmacies (n = 9). Interventions were categorized as comprehensive medication reviews (n = 10), comprehensive medication reviews with pharmacist follow-up (n = 11), and educational interventions provided to patients and/or providers (n = 4). Pharmacist-led interventions had a beneficial effect on 22 out of 32 total medication-related outcomes (eg, number of medications, potentially inappropriate medications, or discontinuation). Most (n = 18) studies reported no evidence of an effect for other outcomes such as health care use, mortality, patient-centered outcomes (falls, cognition, function, quality of life), and ADEs. <b>Discussion</b> Interventions led to improvement in 69% of the medication-related outcomes examined across study settings. Five studies measured ADEs with none accounting for adverse drug-withdrawal events. Large well-designed studies that are powered to find an effect on patient-centered outcomes are needed. <b>Conclusion</b> Pharmacist-led interventions had a significant beneficial effect on medication-related outcomes. There was little evidence of benefit on other outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":41635,"journal":{"name":"Senior Care Pharmacist","volume":"38 12","pages":"506-523"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138470963","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background Midodrine was the first medication approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of orthostatic hypotension. Pharmacologically, midodrine is a peripheral selective alpha-1-adrenergic agonist that can improve standing, sitting, and supine systolic blood pressure. Common side effects include bradycardia, supine hypertension, and paresthesia. A novel side effect of midodrine-induced nightmares has been reported in our patient. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of midodrine-induced nightmares. Objective To investigate and report a clinically significant and unique drug adverse event of midodrine in the treatment of orthostatic hypotension. Case Presentation This report describes a case of persistent nightmares associated with midodrine use in an 83-year-old male who experienced frequent syncope episodes treated with midodrine for orthostatic hypotension (OH). After the initiation of midodrine, the patient complained of increased nightmares, which quickly led to his refusal of the medication, despite the initial improvements in his blood pressure. The timing of administration included an evening dose at 21:00. This novel adverse event of midodrine-induced nightmares will be highlighted and explored in this case report. Conclusion This case demonstrated a unique adverse event of nightmares caused by midodrine. It is hypothesized that autonomic dysfunction plays a role and further investigations should be conducted to confirm this theory. We hope that our case report highlights the importance of careful consideration when prescribing midodrine in older people with orthostatic hypotension.
{"title":"Midodrine-Induced Nightmares in the Treatment of Orthostatic Hypotension: A Case Report.","authors":"Lara Tran, Michael Brodeur","doi":"10.4140/TCP.n.2023.501","DOIUrl":"10.4140/TCP.n.2023.501","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b> Midodrine was the first medication approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of orthostatic hypotension. Pharmacologically, midodrine is a peripheral selective alpha-1-adrenergic agonist that can improve standing, sitting, and supine systolic blood pressure. Common side effects include bradycardia, supine hypertension, and paresthesia. A novel side effect of midodrine-induced nightmares has been reported in our patient. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of midodrine-induced nightmares. <b>Objective</b> To investigate and report a clinically significant and unique drug adverse event of midodrine in the treatment of orthostatic hypotension. <b>Case Presentation</b> This report describes a case of persistent nightmares associated with midodrine use in an 83-year-old male who experienced frequent syncope episodes treated with midodrine for orthostatic hypotension (OH). After the initiation of midodrine, the patient complained of increased nightmares, which quickly led to his refusal of the medication, despite the initial improvements in his blood pressure. The timing of administration included an evening dose at 21:00. This novel adverse event of midodrine-induced nightmares will be highlighted and explored in this case report. <b>Conclusion</b> This case demonstrated a unique adverse event of nightmares caused by midodrine. It is hypothesized that autonomic dysfunction plays a role and further investigations should be conducted to confirm this theory. We hope that our case report highlights the importance of careful consideration when prescribing midodrine in older people with orthostatic hypotension.</p>","PeriodicalId":41635,"journal":{"name":"Senior Care Pharmacist","volume":"38 12","pages":"501-505"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138470961","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Professional practice in any complex health care delivery can proceed at a hectic pace. There are often competing demands for the allocation of time and expertise. Senior care pharmacists are among several subsets within the pharmacy profession who shoulder the responsibility to provide care for and to protect older people who can be at grave risk for health problems from a variety of sources, in particular: medication-related problems. This was elegantly elaborated by influential pharmacy practitioners in practice and academia a little more than 30 years ago.
{"title":"Characterizing the Complexity of Senior Care Pharmacy.","authors":"Chris Alderman","doi":"10.4140/TCP.n.2023.488","DOIUrl":"10.4140/TCP.n.2023.488","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Professional practice in any complex health care delivery can proceed at a hectic pace. There are often competing demands for the allocation of time and expertise. Senior care pharmacists are among several subsets within the pharmacy profession who shoulder the responsibility to provide care for and to protect older people who can be at grave risk for health problems from a variety of sources, in particular: medication-related problems. This was elegantly elaborated by influential pharmacy practitioners in practice and academia a little more than 30 years ago.</p>","PeriodicalId":41635,"journal":{"name":"Senior Care Pharmacist","volume":"38 12","pages":"488-489"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138470957","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
According to the American Board of Medical Specialties, there were 7,123 certified geriatricians practicing in the United States in 2021. The Health Resources and Services Administration estimates a shortage of 27,000 geriatricians in 2025. Only 43% of geriatrics fellowship spots were filled in 2022. With this forthcoming decrease in medical providers, the role of the senior care pharmacist must expand and diversify to provide an equitable level of care that older patients will need-especially with the expansion of antipsychotic, antimicrobial, and opioid stewardship programs. Senior care pharmacists possess a diverse range of skills and knowledge that are indispensable to the health care team. It is time to move beyond the consultant role, expanding both clinically and operationally, to provide the quality health care that older patients need.
{"title":"Diversification and Expansion of Clinical Pharmacy Services: Is it Time for Senior Care Pharmacists to Step Into the Light?","authors":"Kalin M Clifford","doi":"10.4140/TCP.n.2023.490","DOIUrl":"10.4140/TCP.n.2023.490","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>According to the American Board of Medical Specialties, there were 7,123 certified geriatricians practicing in the United States in 2021. The Health Resources and Services Administration estimates a shortage of 27,000 geriatricians in 2025. Only 43% of geriatrics fellowship spots were filled in 2022. With this forthcoming decrease in medical providers, the role of the senior care pharmacist must expand and diversify to provide an equitable level of care that older patients will need-especially with the expansion of antipsychotic, antimicrobial, and opioid stewardship programs. Senior care pharmacists possess a diverse range of skills and knowledge that are indispensable to the health care team. It is time to move beyond the consultant role, expanding both clinically and operationally, to provide the quality health care that older patients need.</p>","PeriodicalId":41635,"journal":{"name":"Senior Care Pharmacist","volume":"38 12","pages":"490-492"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138470959","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Two drugs are covered in this quarterly column. Faricimab-svoa (Vabysmo™) for Macular Degeneration and Diabetic Macular Edema and Omidenepag Isopropyl (Omlonti™) for Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension.
{"title":"New Drugs: Faricimab-svoa (Vabysmo<sup>™</sup>) for Macular Degeneration and Diabetic Macular Edema and Omidenepag Isopropyl (Omlonti<sup>™</sup>) for Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension.","authors":"Lana Gettman","doi":"10.4140/TCP.n.2023.497","DOIUrl":"10.4140/TCP.n.2023.497","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Two drugs are covered in this quarterly column. Faricimab-svoa (Vabysmo<sup>™</sup>) for Macular Degeneration and Diabetic Macular Edema and Omidenepag Isopropyl (Omlonti<sup>™</sup>) for Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension.</p>","PeriodicalId":41635,"journal":{"name":"Senior Care Pharmacist","volume":"38 12","pages":"497-500"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138470962","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}