Senior Care Pharmacist最新文献

This article is the third installment of a multi-part series on the history and usage of antipsychotics in older people living in nursing and assisted living facilities. This article presents next steps and recommendations for appropriate usage of antipsychotics in the older population based on the lead author's early drafts, submitted to the editors prior to his untimely death, of this series and on his consultations with the coauthors. Dr Levenson emphasized in his focus on next steps related to antipsychotic use: that all providers should review the history of antipsychotic use and recognize clinically legitimate alternative explanations for the findings. His conclusions were that "off label" usage should not be a reason to exclude the appropriate use of antipsychotics. His overall recommendations to clinicians are to assess and diagnose the underlying cause of the problem, understand the treatment options and select the best one to address the clinical problem and/or the symptom if the problem cannot be fully resolved, and to focus on all medications, not just antipsychotics, in a patient's regimen to aid in a comprehensive understanding of the assessment and inform therapeutic recommendations.

Traditional definitions of polypharmacy may largely not account for the market proliferation of herbal and dietary supplements, cannabis products, or incorporate the new science of pharmacogenomics (PGx). Polypharmacy is encountered by most pharmacists providing patient care in many settings. The "polypharmacist" can assist patients and providers with solving medication-related problems (MRPs) in this new and challenging environment of supplements and cannabis products by utilizing traditional pharmacology and pharmacokinetic principles, including PGx, broadly across many medical disciplines. One may encounter polypharmacy more in the geriatric population, though in an age of supplements and cannabis proliferation, polypharmacy is increasingly being encountered at younger ages. Not only is polypharmacy training at best fragmented in pharmacy curricula, but it may also not account for the above-mentioned products that may use the same metabolic pathways to increase drug interactions and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) regarding prescription medications. Polypharmacy being more formally prioritized in pharmacist training may better prepare pharmacists for commonly encountered polypharmacy and can be a viable model of practice.

Objective Infections from methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus are increasingly treated in longterm care facilities, but long-term care pharmacies face high costs in the provision of sterile vancomycin for intravenous administration. This study compares pharmaceutical costs of outsourced, compounded, and room temperature premixed vancomycin formulations in a long-term care pharmacy. Design This retrospective observational study reviewed 124 orders of vancomycin. Means for total pharmacy preparation time, pharmacist labor time, and extrapolated time over complete course of treatment were compared for three vancomycin preparations: outsourced, compounded by pharmacy, and room temperature premixed vancomycin formulations. Cost calculations were generated using ingredient costs as reported by the pharmacy and median pharmacist labor costs as published from national sources. Results Mean total preparation times and pharmacist preparation times were shortest for premixed vancomycin. Over full courses of treatment, mean pharmacy preparation time for compounded was 5 hours 3 minutes (mean of 28 treatments) and 2 hours 8 minutes for premixed (mean of 54 treatments). Data on pharmacist time in outsourced orders were not available. Total pharmacy costs were $993.94 for compounded vancomycin, $2220.34 for outsourced, and $809.36 for room temperature premixed vancomycin. Conclusion There were reduced preparation times for room temperature premixed vancomycin compared with compounded and outsourced formulations for skilled nursing facilities. As multiple drug-resistant organism infections are increasingly treated in long-term care, finding cost-effective approaches to medication provision from pharmacies is critical.

Older people are over-represented among individuals that experience adverse drug reactions (ADR) and adverse drug events (ADE). Furthermore, older people are over-represented among individuals that visit emergency departments and are hospitalized because of ADRs. Moreover, older people are overrepresented among those who suffer ADEs while hospitalized. Finally, older people are among those most likely to have an anaphylactic response to prescription medications. Therefore, older people are prime candidates for efforts aimed at optimizing pharmacotherapeutic outcomes. Pharmacogenomics is an approach of using genetic data to optimize pharmacotherapeutic outcomes. Over the last two decades, pharmacogenomics grew from research initiatives into the current environment of pharmacogenomics implementation. Specifically, implementing pharmacogenomics into clinical settings or within health care systems has proven beneficial in optimizing pharmacotherapeutic outcomes. Therefore, pharmacists focused on optimizing pharmacotherapeutic outcomes for older people should be aware of the approaches to and resources available for implementing pharmacogenomics. KEY WORDS: Drug labeling biomarkers, Genes, Older adults, Pharmacogenomics.

The objective of this case report is to illustrate pharmacogenomics (PGx)-guided oxycodone treatment, given the conflicting data on the analgesic response from oxycodone in Cytochrome P450 (CYP)2D6 poor metabolizers (PMs). PGx-guided therapy can help improve treatment outcomes. This case report describes a 58-year-old patient who was prescribed oxycodone for chronic pain management. The patient presented with a history of inadequate pain control despite analgesic treatment with oxycodone (morphine milliequivalent [MME] = 22.5). Pharmacogenetic testing revealed that the patient was a CYP2D6 Poor Metabolizer (PM), which may shed light on the observed lack of analgesic response to oxycodone. The clinical pharmacist recommended switching to an alternative opioid not metabolized via the CYP2D6 pathway. The patient was subsequently switched to hydromorphone (MME = 16), resulting in improved pain control and fewer side effects. The newer hydromorphone dose accounted for a 30% MME dose reduction. The patient's initial average and worst pain score were 7 and 9 out of 10, respectively, per the numeric rating scale (NRS). Upon follow-up with the patient in two weeks, her average and worst pain scores improved to 3 and 3.5 out of 10, respectively, per the NRS. Further PGx testing results led to an overall positive outcome, such as her willingness to participate in physical therapy as a result of improved pain scores. This case highlights the importance of considering individual variability in drug metabolism when prescribing medications, particularly opioids such as oxycodone, to ensure optimal therapeutic outcomes and minimize the risk of adverse events in CYP2D6 PMs.