Anti-formalist constructivism is a legal-educational approach that arises from the combination of different theoretical proposals developed in the global north and accepted in the Latin American reality. Through three fundamental premises for its application, it is expected that criminal procedural law can be taught linking the preconceptions of those who learn, so that from a validation process it is possible to build authentic interpretations with a sense of practical utility. For this, the implementation of performance tests that contain problems without exact answers is proposed, contributing to each student having the possibility of strengthening the development of competences from and for the professional reality of the practice of law.
{"title":"The teaching of criminal procedural law from anti-formalist constructivism","authors":"Juan Sebastian Alejandro Perilla Granados","doi":"10.22197/t2d4fk36","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22197/t2d4fk36","url":null,"abstract":"Anti-formalist constructivism is a legal-educational approach that arises from the combination of different theoretical proposals developed in the global north and accepted in the Latin American reality. Through three fundamental premises for its application, it is expected that criminal procedural law can be taught linking the preconceptions of those who learn, so that from a validation process it is possible to build authentic interpretations with a sense of practical utility. For this, the implementation of performance tests that contain problems without exact answers is proposed, contributing to each student having the possibility of strengthening the development of competences from and for the professional reality of the practice of law.","PeriodicalId":41933,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140247786","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The article seeks to know what has been researched in Latin America on wrongful convictions and prosecutions. Drawing on a systematic literature review from 2010 to July 2023 in WoS, Scopus and SciELO databases, the article identifies a universe of 50 publications. From a quantitative perspective, the paper inquiries into aspects such as years of publication, countries to which they refer, data about the scientific community that has generated this literature, and the topics they address. Then, it provides a qualitative analysis of the content of the publications, distinguishing among those that address general aspects, factors that contribute to wrongful convictions and prosecutions, correction mechanisms, and compensation mechanisms for wrongful convictions and prosecutions. Although with limitations, the findings provide an overview of research in this area in Latin America, showing that, although scholarship is still scarce compared with other latitudes, the topic has begun to attract interest in recent years in the region.
{"title":"¿Qué se ha investigado en América Latina sobre condenas e imputaciones erróneas? Una revisión sistemática de la literatura disponible en el período 2010-2023","authors":"Víctor Beltrán Román, Mauricio Duce Julio","doi":"10.22197/x53fm553","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22197/x53fm553","url":null,"abstract":"The article seeks to know what has been researched in Latin America on wrongful convictions and prosecutions. Drawing on a systematic literature review from 2010 to July 2023 in WoS, Scopus and SciELO databases, the article identifies a universe of 50 publications. From a quantitative perspective, the paper inquiries into aspects such as years of publication, countries to which they refer, data about the scientific community that has generated this literature, and the topics they address. Then, it provides a qualitative analysis of the content of the publications, distinguishing among those that address general aspects, factors that contribute to wrongful convictions and prosecutions, correction mechanisms, and compensation mechanisms for wrongful convictions and prosecutions. Although with limitations, the findings provide an overview of research in this area in Latin America, showing that, although scholarship is still scarce compared with other latitudes, the topic has begun to attract interest in recent years in the region.","PeriodicalId":41933,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140247468","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-26DOI: 10.22197/rbdpp.v10i1.872
Thyerrí José Cruz Silva, Samyle Regina Matos Oliveira
Criminal execution is a state activity based on the principles of certain, strict and exhaustive legality and jurisdictionality, which is why the rights and duties of prisoners must always comply with legal provisions. Despite this, the Brazilian Regional Federal Court of the 4th Region (TRF-4) has been imposed on the monitored person the burden of bearing the expenses arising from electronic monitoring, a burden that is not supported by Brazilian legislation that deals with the subject. For this reason, it is necessary to question, as a research problem: are these TRF-4 decisions legally correct? In view of this, this article aims to critically analyze the decisions of the TRF-4 in this sense and the main arguments used, in order to verify whether they are legally correct or mistaken, due to the lack of a explicit legal provision in this regard, which, in fact, came to be recognized on several occasions by the Brazilian Superior Tribunal of Justice (STJ). The choice of TRF-4 is justified by the significant number of Court decisions in this regard, as well as by the fact that the other Federal Regional Courts do not have sentences with this content and intention. The theoretical framework uses productions related to criminal execution and its principles of legality and jurisdiction. The research concludes that the aforementioned decisional action of the TRF-4 is out of step with the principles of legality and jurisdictionality in criminal execution.
{"title":"Legalidade “versus” jurisdicionalidade na execução penal? Ônus financeiro da monitoração eletrônica em decisões do TRF-4","authors":"Thyerrí José Cruz Silva, Samyle Regina Matos Oliveira","doi":"10.22197/rbdpp.v10i1.872","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v10i1.872","url":null,"abstract":"Criminal execution is a state activity based on the principles of certain, strict and exhaustive legality and jurisdictionality, which is why the rights and duties of prisoners must always comply with legal provisions. Despite this, the Brazilian Regional Federal Court of the 4th Region (TRF-4) has been imposed on the monitored person the burden of bearing the expenses arising from electronic monitoring, a burden that is not supported by Brazilian legislation that deals with the subject. For this reason, it is necessary to question, as a research problem: are these TRF-4 decisions legally correct? In view of this, this article aims to critically analyze the decisions of the TRF-4 in this sense and the main arguments used, in order to verify whether they are legally correct or mistaken, due to the lack of a explicit legal provision in this regard, which, in fact, came to be recognized on several occasions by the Brazilian Superior Tribunal of Justice (STJ). The choice of TRF-4 is justified by the significant number of Court decisions in this regard, as well as by the fact that the other Federal Regional Courts do not have sentences with this content and intention. The theoretical framework uses productions related to criminal execution and its principles of legality and jurisdiction. The research concludes that the aforementioned decisional action of the TRF-4 is out of step with the principles of legality and jurisdictionality in criminal execution.","PeriodicalId":41933,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2023-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139155705","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-26DOI: 10.22197/rbdpp.v10i1.873
Marcos Eugênio Vieira Melo, André Rocha Sampaio
This article aims to address the meta-legal relations between the management of the speed of the criminal process and the social constraints arising from neoliberal reason. To this end, it is based on the premise established by Foucault and deepened by Dardot and Laval that neoliberalism has become socially rooted to the point of transmuting from a simple economic model to a rationality that spreads to the most diverse social fields. The work is guided by the question: are there harmful effects beyond the loss of quality in the motivation of decisions with the adoption of efficiency logic by the criminal judge? The objective is to verify whether the management principles of this reason may be harmful to the proper functioning of the criminal process. This is an exploratory, interdisciplinary research, based exclusively on bibliographical references. The conclusion is that there are no conditions for intensifying the pace of the criminal process without a loss of quality that is not only technical, but also democratic, since acceleration without other measures ends up catalyzing authoritarian clots that have never been completely expunged from the Brazilian system of criminal procedure.
{"title":"Intersecções entre o Eficientismo Processual Penal e o Neoliberalismo","authors":"Marcos Eugênio Vieira Melo, André Rocha Sampaio","doi":"10.22197/rbdpp.v10i1.873","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v10i1.873","url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to address the meta-legal relations between the management of the speed of the criminal process and the social constraints arising from neoliberal reason. To this end, it is based on the premise established by Foucault and deepened by Dardot and Laval that neoliberalism has become socially rooted to the point of transmuting from a simple economic model to a rationality that spreads to the most diverse social fields. The work is guided by the question: are there harmful effects beyond the loss of quality in the motivation of decisions with the adoption of efficiency logic by the criminal judge? The objective is to verify whether the management principles of this reason may be harmful to the proper functioning of the criminal process. This is an exploratory, interdisciplinary research, based exclusively on bibliographical references. The conclusion is that there are no conditions for intensifying the pace of the criminal process without a loss of quality that is not only technical, but also democratic, since acceleration without other measures ends up catalyzing authoritarian clots that have never been completely expunged from the Brazilian system of criminal procedure.","PeriodicalId":41933,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2023-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139155914","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-26DOI: 10.22197/rbdpp.v10i1.884
Daniel Wei Liang Wang, Luisa Moraes Abreu Ferreira, Matheus De Barros, Júlia Abrahão Homsi, Mariana Morais Zambom, Ezequiel Fajreldines dos Santos, Paulo Sergio de Albuquerque Coelho Filho
This article is based on a representative and randomly selected sample of 396 individual criminal decisions from the Federal Supreme Court, issued between January 1, 2020, and June 22, 2021, related to the COVID-19 pandemic. We tracked the petitions, the type of imprisonment, the date of judgment, the type of legal action, and the outcomes of these requests. Subsequently, we conducted a qualitative analysis of the arguments employed by the Court in reaching its decisions. The main objective of the study is to understand how the Court ruled on requests for release from incarceration and the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic in the judicial reasoning. The findings indicate that the pandemic had no relevant impact on the Court’s decision-making process. Dismissals on procedural grounds prevailed, allowing the court to avoid ruling on the merits of a claim. On the other hand, when the merits were analyzed, the pandemic was not treated as a sufficient argument for releasing a prisoner. Additionally, during the pandemic, CNJ’s Recommendation No. 62 and ADPF No. 347 had no argumentative prominence in the few decisions that granted requests for release. This research reinforces the diagnosis that the pandemic has not changed how the Judiciary deals with imprisonment. This finding contributes to understand the challenges in tackling mass incarceration in Brazil.
{"title":"Deciding not to decide","authors":"Daniel Wei Liang Wang, Luisa Moraes Abreu Ferreira, Matheus De Barros, Júlia Abrahão Homsi, Mariana Morais Zambom, Ezequiel Fajreldines dos Santos, Paulo Sergio de Albuquerque Coelho Filho","doi":"10.22197/rbdpp.v10i1.884","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v10i1.884","url":null,"abstract":"This article is based on a representative and randomly selected sample of 396 individual criminal decisions from the Federal Supreme Court, issued between January 1, 2020, and June 22, 2021, related to the COVID-19 pandemic. We tracked the petitions, the type of imprisonment, the date of judgment, the type of legal action, and the outcomes of these requests. Subsequently, we conducted a qualitative analysis of the arguments employed by the Court in reaching its decisions. The main objective of the study is to understand how the Court ruled on requests for release from incarceration and the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic in the judicial reasoning. The findings indicate that the pandemic had no relevant impact on the Court’s decision-making process. Dismissals on procedural grounds prevailed, allowing the court to avoid ruling on the merits of a claim. On the other hand, when the merits were analyzed, the pandemic was not treated as a sufficient argument for releasing a prisoner. Additionally, during the pandemic, CNJ’s Recommendation No. 62 and ADPF No. 347 had no argumentative prominence in the few decisions that granted requests for release. This research reinforces the diagnosis that the pandemic has not changed how the Judiciary deals with imprisonment. This finding contributes to understand the challenges in tackling mass incarceration in Brazil.","PeriodicalId":41933,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2023-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139155728","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-26DOI: 10.22197/rbdpp.v10i1.891
Omar Pezo Jiménez, Carlos Augusto Bellodas Ticona, Américo Alca Gómez
The objective was to analyze the implications associated with the enactment of Law No. 31592, which introduces significant amendments to the Code of Criminal Procedure regarding the acquitted person's conviction. For these purposes, it was analyzed whether such legislation complies with national and international standards regarding judicial conformity, as well as to examine its feasibility and effectiveness in terms of judicial proceedings aimed at challenging acquittal convictions. A mixed methodological approach was adopted over an extended period, covering the analysis of judicial decisions issued between the period 2010 - 2022. Through a thorough analysis, it was concluded that the principle of double jeopardy should be applied exclusively to the convicted person, highlighting that challenges related to acquittal convictions should be the competence of a Criminal or Mixed Chamber belonging to a specific Judicial District, instead of being attributed to the Supreme Court. Consequently, the modification introduced by this Law is highly detrimental by virtue of the possible difficulties it could cause in the operability of the appeal processes, as well as its potential to weaken the principle of double conformity, which constitutes a fundamental pillar in the judicial system.
{"title":"Desnaturalización del doble conforme y desbordamiento de carga procesal en el Perú a propósito de la Ley N° 31592, ley que modifica la condena del absuelto","authors":"Omar Pezo Jiménez, Carlos Augusto Bellodas Ticona, Américo Alca Gómez","doi":"10.22197/rbdpp.v10i1.891","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v10i1.891","url":null,"abstract":"The objective was to analyze the implications associated with the enactment of Law No. 31592, which introduces significant amendments to the Code of Criminal Procedure regarding the acquitted person's conviction. For these purposes, it was analyzed whether such legislation complies with national and international standards regarding judicial conformity, as well as to examine its feasibility and effectiveness in terms of judicial proceedings aimed at challenging acquittal convictions. A mixed methodological approach was adopted over an extended period, covering the analysis of judicial decisions issued between the period 2010 - 2022. Through a thorough analysis, it was concluded that the principle of double jeopardy should be applied exclusively to the convicted person, highlighting that challenges related to acquittal convictions should be the competence of a Criminal or Mixed Chamber belonging to a specific Judicial District, instead of being attributed to the Supreme Court. Consequently, the modification introduced by this Law is highly detrimental by virtue of the possible difficulties it could cause in the operability of the appeal processes, as well as its potential to weaken the principle of double conformity, which constitutes a fundamental pillar in the judicial system.","PeriodicalId":41933,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2023-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139156935","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This study compares how the laws in the United States and Brazil handle the use of digital evidence from smartphones in initial criminal investigations. The main goal is to understand the challenges when trying to protect the right to avoid self-incrimination while also ensuring public safety. By looking at court decisions from 2014 to 2023, the study explores how the legal systems in both countries deal with arguments for and against law enforcement being able to unlock smartphones against the will of the owner. The main issue being examined is the balance between respecting citizens' privacy rights and making sure defendants get fair treatment in the legal process. The research question driving this study is: How do Brazil and the U.S. manage the situation where law enforcement needs to unlock smartphones, while also respecting constitutional rights and public safety? To answer this question, the study looks at recent court cases from both countries and identifies important arguments about forced smartphone unlocking. The findings show problems in these legal proceedings, particularly when it comes to protecting the privacy of smartphone users and defendants' rights. A key point that comes out is that when law enforcement examines suspects' phones, it can jeopardize the proper handling of evidence and the right against self-incrimination that's protected by the Constitution. The study highlights shortcomings in the responses of the Supreme Courts of Brazil and the United States. This suggests a need for a more detailed framework that can address these challenges better and solve disagreements in lower courts. In essence, this article discusses the conflict between privacy rights and self-incrimination on one hand, and the government's duty to maintain public safety and prevent illegal evidence on the other. In conclusion, this article explores the legal issues around forced smartphone unlocking in Brazil and the United States. It not only emphasizes the importance of balancing individual rights with public safety but also calls for a more comprehensive legal approach to deal with these challenges effectively.
{"title":"Balancing Self-Incrimination and Public Safety: A Comparative Analysis of Compelled Smartphone Unlocking in Brazilian and U.S. Legal Systems","authors":"Rafael Francisco França","doi":"10.22197/rbdpp.v9i3.867","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v9i3.867","url":null,"abstract":"This study compares how the laws in the United States and Brazil handle the use of digital evidence from smartphones in initial criminal investigations. The main goal is to understand the challenges when trying to protect the right to avoid self-incrimination while also ensuring public safety. By looking at court decisions from 2014 to 2023, the study explores how the legal systems in both countries deal with arguments for and against law enforcement being able to unlock smartphones against the will of the owner. The main issue being examined is the balance between respecting citizens' privacy rights and making sure defendants get fair treatment in the legal process. The research question driving this study is: How do Brazil and the U.S. manage the situation where law enforcement needs to unlock smartphones, while also respecting constitutional rights and public safety? To answer this question, the study looks at recent court cases from both countries and identifies important arguments about forced smartphone unlocking. The findings show problems in these legal proceedings, particularly when it comes to protecting the privacy of smartphone users and defendants' rights. A key point that comes out is that when law enforcement examines suspects' phones, it can jeopardize the proper handling of evidence and the right against self-incrimination that's protected by the Constitution. The study highlights shortcomings in the responses of the Supreme Courts of Brazil and the United States. This suggests a need for a more detailed framework that can address these challenges better and solve disagreements in lower courts. In essence, this article discusses the conflict between privacy rights and self-incrimination on one hand, and the government's duty to maintain public safety and prevent illegal evidence on the other. In conclusion, this article explores the legal issues around forced smartphone unlocking in Brazil and the United States. It not only emphasizes the importance of balancing individual rights with public safety but also calls for a more comprehensive legal approach to deal with these challenges effectively.","PeriodicalId":41933,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134906836","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Este trabalho pretende analisar a utilização de ferramentas de inteligência artificial, como ChatGPT, na pesquisa e redação científicas e suas tensões com os requisitos de integridade em coautoria. Assim, almeja-se problematizar a temática e sugerir critérios para definição da coautoria em trabalhos científicos com o uso de ferramentas de inteligência artificial. Conclui-se que, diante do cenário atual, as revistas científicas devem inserir normas sobre a questão, recomendando-se os seguintes parâmetros: 1. mecanismos de inteligência artificial (como ChatGPT) não cumprem os requisitos para coautoria; 2. autore/as devem declarar (na metodologia ou nos agradecimentos) a utilização de mecanismos de inteligência artificial na redação do artigo e/ou nas demais fases da pesquisa científica; 3. autore/as são responsáveis por erros, plágios e outras más-práticas que eventualmente ocorram nas suas pesquisas em razão da utilização de mecanismos de inteligência artificial.
{"title":"Editorial – Inteligência artificial e coautoria de trabalhos científicos: discussões sobre utilização de ChatGPT em pesquisa e redação científicas","authors":"Vinicius Gomes de Vasconcellos","doi":"10.22197/rbdpp.v9i3.913","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v9i3.913","url":null,"abstract":"Este trabalho pretende analisar a utilização de ferramentas de inteligência artificial, como ChatGPT, na pesquisa e redação científicas e suas tensões com os requisitos de integridade em coautoria. Assim, almeja-se problematizar a temática e sugerir critérios para definição da coautoria em trabalhos científicos com o uso de ferramentas de inteligência artificial. Conclui-se que, diante do cenário atual, as revistas científicas devem inserir normas sobre a questão, recomendando-se os seguintes parâmetros: 1. mecanismos de inteligência artificial (como ChatGPT) não cumprem os requisitos para coautoria; 2. autore/as devem declarar (na metodologia ou nos agradecimentos) a utilização de mecanismos de inteligência artificial na redação do artigo e/ou nas demais fases da pesquisa científica; 3. autore/as são responsáveis por erros, plágios e outras más-práticas que eventualmente ocorram nas suas pesquisas em razão da utilização de mecanismos de inteligência artificial.","PeriodicalId":41933,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134907710","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
A palavra da vítima tem grande relevância em casos de violência sexual, entretanto no Brasil há escassez de recomendações específicas para a realização de entrevistas nestes casos. Este artigo visa apresentar procedimentos a serem adotados em entrevistas com mulheres vítimas de violência sexual. As recomendações incluem a conscientização sobre mitos de estupro, estabelecimento de rapport, gravação do depoimento, e uso de relato livre e perguntas abertas. Essas práticas estão em consonância com as recomendações científicas e podem ser utilizadas para capacitar profissionais da segurança pública, a fim preservar a prova testemunhal e evitar revitimização.
{"title":"Ouvir, respeitar, proteger: recomendações para entrevista com mulheres vítimas de violência sexual","authors":"Arielle Sagrillo Scarpati, Willian Cecconello, Mônica Bernardes, Sabrina Bianchini, Lilian Milnitsky Stein","doi":"10.22197/rbdpp.v9i3.851","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v9i3.851","url":null,"abstract":"A palavra da vítima tem grande relevância em casos de violência sexual, entretanto no Brasil há escassez de recomendações específicas para a realização de entrevistas nestes casos. Este artigo visa apresentar procedimentos a serem adotados em entrevistas com mulheres vítimas de violência sexual. As recomendações incluem a conscientização sobre mitos de estupro, estabelecimento de rapport, gravação do depoimento, e uso de relato livre e perguntas abertas. Essas práticas estão em consonância com as recomendações científicas e podem ser utilizadas para capacitar profissionais da segurança pública, a fim preservar a prova testemunhal e evitar revitimização.","PeriodicalId":41933,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134908556","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The paper conducts a comprehensive analysis of corporate criminal liability in Italy, with a specific focus on internal corporate investigations. After providing a brief overview of the Italian legal system concerning corporate criminal liability, the paper compares internal investigations conducted by companies with the Public Prosecutor's preliminary investigations, examining their respective strengths, weaknesses, and differences. Additionally, the research explores the admissibility of internal investigations during the preliminary investigation stage and in the negotiation process, specifying the inherent limitations and practical challenges in the absence of specific regulations on this matter.
{"title":"Internal investigations in the trial of corporations in Italy: the practical implication of their admissibility for trial purposes","authors":"Marco Alessandro Bartolucci","doi":"10.22197/rbdpp.v9i3.827","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v9i3.827","url":null,"abstract":"The paper conducts a comprehensive analysis of corporate criminal liability in Italy, with a specific focus on internal corporate investigations. After providing a brief overview of the Italian legal system concerning corporate criminal liability, the paper compares internal investigations conducted by companies with the Public Prosecutor's preliminary investigations, examining their respective strengths, weaknesses, and differences. Additionally, the research explores the admissibility of internal investigations during the preliminary investigation stage and in the negotiation process, specifying the inherent limitations and practical challenges in the absence of specific regulations on this matter.","PeriodicalId":41933,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134907190","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：