首页 > 最新文献

Revista de Drept Constituțional最新文献

英文 中文
THE STATE OF EXCEPTION IN THE GREEK CONSTITUTION:THE RESILIENCE OF THE GREEK CONSTITUTION DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC 希腊宪法的例外状态:2019冠状病毒病大流行期间希腊宪法的复原力
Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.47743/rdc-2021-1-0002
Evripidis Stylianidis
The state of exception is provided for in constitutions in response to emergency situations. The resilience of constitutions is tested in such situations, which are marked by the concentration of power in the executive and limitations in the exercise of fundamental rights. Although the Greek Constitution allows for the declaration of a state of siege, this does not include the case of a public health crisis. Nevertheless, particular constitutional provisions form an emergency mechanism, which proved to be effective against the COVID-19 pandemic and in accordance with democracy and the rule of law.
宪法为应对紧急情况规定了例外状态。在这种情况下,宪法的恢复力受到考验,其特点是权力集中在行政部门,基本权利的行使受到限制。虽然《希腊宪法》允许宣布戒严状态,但这并不包括公共卫生危机的情况。然而,宪法的特定条款形成了一种紧急机制,事实证明,这种机制在应对COVID-19大流行方面是有效的,符合民主和法治。
{"title":"THE STATE OF EXCEPTION IN THE GREEK CONSTITUTION:THE RESILIENCE OF THE GREEK \u0000CONSTITUTION DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC","authors":"Evripidis Stylianidis","doi":"10.47743/rdc-2021-1-0002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.47743/rdc-2021-1-0002","url":null,"abstract":"The state of exception is provided for in constitutions in response to emergency \u0000situations. The resilience of constitutions is tested in such situations, which are \u0000marked by the concentration of power in the executive and limitations in the \u0000exercise of fundamental rights. Although the Greek Constitution allows for the \u0000declaration of a state of siege, this does not include the case of a public health \u0000crisis. Nevertheless, particular constitutional provisions form an emergency \u0000mechanism, which proved to be effective against the COVID-19 pandemic and \u0000in accordance with democracy and the rule of law.","PeriodicalId":421528,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Drept Constituțional","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122343736","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
VALENCES AND INADVERTENCES IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL REGULATION OF ACTS SUBJECT TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE TUTELAGE CONTROL OF THE PREFECT 宪法和法律对受州长行政监护控制的行为的规制的有效性和疏忽
Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.47743/rdc-2022-2-0006
A. Niță
{"title":"VALENCES AND INADVERTENCES IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL REGULATION OF ACTS SUBJECT TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE TUTELAGE CONTROL OF THE PREFECT","authors":"A. Niță","doi":"10.47743/rdc-2022-2-0006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.47743/rdc-2022-2-0006","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":421528,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Drept Constituțional","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121210941","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Unconstitutional legal solutions enshrined in the Code of Criminal Procedure of 2014 2014年《刑事诉讼法》规定的违宪法律解决办法
Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.47743/rdc-2016-3-0004
T. Toader, Marieta Safta
This study continues the presentation on the development of the constitutional court’s case-law, from ascertaining the unconstitutionality of the legal rule to ascertaining the unconstitutionality of the legal solution promoted by that rule with punctual respect to criminal procedure. The constitutional review transcends the strict boundaries of referrals brought before the Court in order to purify the legal system from those that reproduce legal solutions found to be unconstitutional. Thus, it is emphasized both the effect of sanctioning the rule which was the subject matter of the exception of unconstitutionality, and the preventive effect of constitutional review, by the inability of the legislature to resume a legal solution found unconstitutional, except where there is a change of the social and economic context.
本研究继续介绍宪法法院判例法的发展,从确定法律规则的违宪性,到确定该规则促进的法律解决方案在刑事程序方面的违宪性。宪法审查超越了向法院提交案件的严格界限,以便使法律制度不重复被认为违宪的法律解决办法。因此,它既强调了批准作为违宪例外的主题事项的规则的效果,也强调了宪法审查的预防效果,因为立法机关没有能力恢复被认为违宪的法律解决办法,除非社会和经济情况发生了变化。
{"title":"Unconstitutional legal solutions enshrined in the Code of Criminal Procedure of 2014","authors":"T. Toader, Marieta Safta","doi":"10.47743/rdc-2016-3-0004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.47743/rdc-2016-3-0004","url":null,"abstract":"This study continues the presentation on the development of the constitutional court’s \u0000case-law, from ascertaining the unconstitutionality of the legal rule to \u0000ascertaining the unconstitutionality of the legal solution promoted by that rule \u0000with punctual respect to criminal procedure. The constitutional review \u0000transcends the strict boundaries of referrals brought before the Court in order \u0000to purify the legal system from those that reproduce legal solutions found to be \u0000unconstitutional. Thus, it is emphasized both the effect of sanctioning the rule \u0000which was the subject matter of the exception of unconstitutionality, and the \u0000preventive effect of constitutional review, by the inability of the legislature to \u0000resume a legal solution found unconstitutional, except where there is a change \u0000of the social and economic context.","PeriodicalId":421528,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Drept Constituțional","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129207242","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Criminal law as ultima ratio / The constitutional regime of the motion of censure, according to the Romanian Constitution 最后的刑法/根据《罗马尼亚宪法》的弹劾动议的宪法制度
Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.47743/rdc-2021-2-0007
Marieta Safta
{"title":"Criminal law as ultima ratio / The constitutional regime of the motion of censure, \u0000according to the Romanian Constitution","authors":"Marieta Safta","doi":"10.47743/rdc-2021-2-0007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.47743/rdc-2021-2-0007","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":421528,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Drept Constituțional","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126106667","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Constitutional justice in the European Union. Legislation, case law and doctrine course – notes 欧盟的宪法司法。立法、判例法和学说课程笔记
Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.47743/rdc-2022-1-0008
I. Nistor
{"title":"Constitutional justice in the European Union. Legislation, case law and doctrine course – notes","authors":"I. Nistor","doi":"10.47743/rdc-2022-1-0008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.47743/rdc-2022-1-0008","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":421528,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Drept Constituțional","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124120821","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Brief considerations regarding decision no. 26/2021 of the constitutional court regarding the constitutionality of the provisions of the art. 4881 paragraph 2 of Code of criminal procedure 关于第1号决定的简要考虑。宪法法院第26/2021号关于本条规定是否合宪性的决议。4881刑事诉讼法第2款
Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.47743/rdc-2020-2-0004
Ioana Narcisa Anițulesei
In the present study, the author analyzes the provisions of art. 4881 of the Code of Criminal Procedure which, until now, have been the subject of multiple exceptions of unconstitutionality examined by the Constitutional Court. Mainly, the study focuses on the considerations set out in Decision no. 26/2021 pronounced by Constitutional Court in which was statued the constitutionality of the provisions of art. 4881 paragraph 2 and 3 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In his approach, the author makes additional arguments in support of the unconstitutionality of the rule by reference to national and European provisions enshrining the principle of equality of citizens before the law.
在本研究中,作者分析了艺术的规定。《刑事诉讼法》第4881条的规定,到目前为止,这些规定一直是宪法法院审查的多个违宪例外的主题。这项研究主要集中于第11号决定所载的考虑。第26/2021号宪法法院宣布,其中规定了第2条规定的合宪性。4881《刑事诉讼法》第2和第3款。发件人在其方法中还提出了其他论据,以引用国家和欧洲规定的公民在法律面前平等的原则,来支持这一规定是违宪的。
{"title":"Brief considerations regarding decision no. 26/2021 of the constitutional court regarding the constitutionality of the provisions of the art. 4881 paragraph 2 of Code of criminal procedure","authors":"Ioana Narcisa Anițulesei","doi":"10.47743/rdc-2020-2-0004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.47743/rdc-2020-2-0004","url":null,"abstract":"In the present study, the author analyzes the provisions of art. 4881 of the Code of \u0000Criminal Procedure which, until now, have been the subject of multiple exceptions \u0000of unconstitutionality examined by the Constitutional Court. \u0000 Mainly, the study focuses on the considerations set out in Decision no. 26/2021 \u0000pronounced by Constitutional Court in which was statued the constitutionality of \u0000the provisions of art. 4881 paragraph 2 and 3 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. \u0000 In his approach, the author makes additional arguments in support of the \u0000unconstitutionality of the rule by reference to national and European provisions \u0000enshrining the principle of equality of citizens before the law.","PeriodicalId":421528,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Drept Constituțional","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121874085","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Improving Human Rights Protection on the national and the European Level 改善国家和欧洲层面的人权保障
Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.47743/rdc-2015-1-0001
Rudolf Dur Schnutz
The recent move towards the individual access to constitutional justice is a progress for protection of human rights in Europe. The explicit purpose of these efforts is to settle human rights issues on the national level and to reduce the number of cases at the Strasbourg Court. Such individual complaints have to be designed in a way that makes them an effective remedy which has to be exhausted before a case can be brought before the European Court of Human Rights. This paper points out the current state of these improvements on the national level in a difficult context on the European level and the recommendations of the Venice Commission in this regard.
最近在个人获得宪法司法方面采取的行动是欧洲保护人权的一项进展。这些努力的明确目的是在国家一级解决人权问题,并减少斯特拉斯堡法院的案件数量。这种个人申诉的设计方式必须使其成为一种有效的补救办法,在将案件提交欧洲人权法院之前必须用尽这种补救办法。本文指出了在欧洲层面的困难背景下国家层面上这些改进的现状以及威尼斯委员会在这方面的建议。
{"title":"Improving Human Rights Protection on the national and the European Level","authors":"Rudolf Dur Schnutz","doi":"10.47743/rdc-2015-1-0001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.47743/rdc-2015-1-0001","url":null,"abstract":"The recent move towards the individual access to constitutional justice is a progress for \u0000protection of human rights in Europe. The explicit purpose of these efforts is to settle \u0000human rights issues on the national level and to reduce the number of cases at the \u0000Strasbourg Court. Such individual complaints have to be designed in a way that \u0000makes them an effective remedy which has to be exhausted before a case can be \u0000brought before the European Court of Human Rights. This paper points out the \u0000current state of these improvements on the national level in a difficult context on the \u0000European level and the recommendations of the Venice Commission in this regard.","PeriodicalId":421528,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Drept Constituțional","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123213835","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Considerations regarding the relationship between the right of the European Union and the Romanian juridical order 关于欧洲联盟权利与罗马尼亚司法秩序之间关系的考虑
Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.47743/rdc-2016-1-0002
M. Enache
The European right represents the set of juridical norms that may be enforced in the European juridical order and, according to an interpretation of the Court of Justice within the European Communities' Union, the current Court of Justice of the European Union, it constitutes “an own juridical order that is integrated into the juridical system of the member states”. As for the content of the European right, it has the character of a juridical order, namely it represents an organised and structured series of juridical norms having its own sources, endowed with bodies and procedures able to issue them, to interpret them as well as to find and sanction the possible violations.Making reference to the internal juridical order of the member states, the European right is an autonomous and original juridical order that involves the following aspects: the autonomy of the European right's sources, the autonomy of the European right's notions that do not depend on the qualifications acknowledged by the national right, the autonomy of the European norms that cannot be deprived of efficacy (of the useful effect) by the internal right rules of the member states. Several criteria to classify the European juridical norms have been expressed in the doctrine whereas the juridical force criterion had the largest support. Thus, according to its sources, the European right can be divided into the original or primary right5 and the derived or secondary right.
欧洲权利代表了一套可以在欧洲司法秩序中执行的司法规范,根据欧洲共同体法院的解释,即目前的欧盟法院,它构成了“一种融入成员国司法体系的自己的司法秩序”。就欧洲权利的内容而言,它具有司法秩序的特征,即它代表了一系列有组织和结构的司法规范,它们有自己的来源,具有能够发布、解释这些规范以及发现和制裁可能的侵权行为的机构和程序。参照成员国内部的法律秩序,欧洲权利是一种自主的、原创性的法律秩序,它涉及以下几个方面:欧洲权利来源的自治、不依赖于国家权利所承认的资格的欧洲权利概念的自治、成员国内部权利规则不能剥夺其效力(有用效果)的欧洲规范的自治。该学说对欧洲司法规范的分类提出了若干标准,其中司法力量标准得到了最大的支持。因此,根据其来源,欧洲权利可分为原始权利或主要权利5和派生权利或次要权利。
{"title":"Considerations regarding the relationship between the right of the European Union and the Romanian juridical order","authors":"M. Enache","doi":"10.47743/rdc-2016-1-0002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.47743/rdc-2016-1-0002","url":null,"abstract":"The European right represents the set of juridical norms that may be enforced in the \u0000European juridical order and, according to an interpretation of the Court of \u0000Justice within the European Communities' Union, the current Court of Justice of \u0000the European Union, it constitutes “an own juridical order that is integrated into \u0000the juridical system of the member states”. As for the content of the European \u0000right, it has the character of a juridical order, namely it represents an organised \u0000and structured series of juridical norms having its own sources, endowed with \u0000bodies and procedures able to issue them, to interpret them as well as to find \u0000and sanction the possible violations.\u0000Making reference to the internal juridical order of the member states, the \u0000European right is an autonomous and original juridical order that involves the \u0000following aspects: the autonomy of the European right's sources, the autonomy \u0000of the European right's notions that do not depend on the qualifications \u0000acknowledged by the national right, the autonomy of the European norms that \u0000cannot be deprived of efficacy (of the useful effect) by the internal right rules of \u0000the member states. \u0000Several criteria to classify the European juridical norms have been expressed in \u0000the doctrine whereas the juridical force criterion had the largest support. Thus, \u0000according to its sources, the European right can be divided into the original or \u0000primary right5 and the derived or secondary right.","PeriodicalId":421528,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Drept Constituțional","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121317563","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Principle of Proportionality Reflected in the Case-law of the Constitutional Court of Romania 比例原则在罗马尼亚宪法法院判例法中的体现
Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.47743/rdc-2015-1-0002
Mona-Maria Pivniceru, Károly Benke
This study aims at presenting a more complex image of the principle of proportionality through an analysis that combines the theoretical and the jurisprudential perspectives. The precondition of this analysis is the classic opinion of this originally German principle which requires a distinction between the objective and subjective conditions of limitation/restriction of fundamental rights/freedoms, each of which shall be subject to a separate test in order to determine whether limitations/restrictions thus established are justified. However, we reveal the way in which such principle has been accepted in the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights, of the European Court of Justice and of the Constitutional Court of Romania, indicating the variations achieved in their case-law. As concerns the acceptance manner of the principle of proportionality in the case-law of the Constitutional Court of Romania, we analyze the fundamental differences between the classic principle of proportionality, which intrinsically characterizes the relative fundamental rights/freedoms, and the principle of proportionality covered by Article 53 of the Constitution. Likewise, the focus is on the analysis of subjective conditions of limitation of fundamental rights/freedoms in the light of the proportionality test conducted by the Constitutional Court of Romania and on the need for a precise constitutional review in order to avoid the development of distorted forms of implementation of this principle
本研究旨在通过结合理论和法学视角的分析,呈现出比例原则更为复杂的形象。这一分析的前提是这一最初来自德国的原则的经典观点,该原则要求区分限制/限制基本权利/自由的客观条件和主观条件,每一种条件都应接受单独的检验,以确定这样建立的限制/限制是否合理。然而,我们揭示了在欧洲人权法院、欧洲法院和罗马尼亚宪法法院的判例法中接受这一原则的方式,指出了它们的判例法中所取得的差异。关于罗马尼亚宪法法院判例法中比例原则的接受方式,我们分析了具有相对基本权利/自由本质特征的经典比例原则与宪法第53条所涵盖的比例原则之间的根本差异。同样,重点是根据罗马尼亚宪法法院进行的相称性检验,分析限制基本权利/自由的主观条件,以及需要进行精确的宪法审查,以避免发展曲解这一原则的执行形式
{"title":"The Principle of Proportionality Reflected in the Case-law of the Constitutional Court of Romania","authors":"Mona-Maria Pivniceru, Károly Benke","doi":"10.47743/rdc-2015-1-0002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.47743/rdc-2015-1-0002","url":null,"abstract":"This study aims at presenting a more complex image of the principle of proportionality through \u0000an analysis that combines the theoretical and the jurisprudential perspectives. The \u0000precondition of this analysis is the classic opinion of this originally German principle \u0000which requires a distinction between the objective and subjective conditions of \u0000limitation/restriction of fundamental rights/freedoms, each of which shall be subject \u0000to a separate test in order to determine whether limitations/restrictions thus \u0000established are justified. However, we reveal the way in which such principle has been \u0000accepted in the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights, of the European \u0000Court of Justice and of the Constitutional Court of Romania, indicating the variations \u0000achieved in their case-law. As concerns the acceptance manner of the principle of \u0000proportionality in the case-law of the Constitutional Court of Romania, we analyze \u0000the fundamental differences between the classic principle of proportionality, which \u0000intrinsically characterizes the relative fundamental rights/freedoms, and the principle \u0000of proportionality covered by Article 53 of the Constitution. Likewise, the focus is on \u0000the analysis of subjective conditions of limitation of fundamental rights/freedoms in \u0000the light of the proportionality test conducted by the Constitutional Court of Romania \u0000and on the need for a precise constitutional review in order to avoid the development \u0000of distorted forms of implementation of this principle","PeriodicalId":421528,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Drept Constituțional","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129573756","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The provinces united with Romania and the reunification Constitution (1923) 与罗马尼亚合并的省份和统一宪法(1923年)
Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.47743/rdc-2023-1-0002
G. Rusu
The end of the First World War (1914-1918) was to completely change the face of Europe. Empires fell apart and from their ashes and new states were born based on the liberal “principle of nationalities”. Other countries, including Romania, completed their national state by uniting with provinces previously belonging various imperial crowns. From a constitutional point of view, the situation in these territories was quite confusing, at least until the drafting of the 1923 Reunification Constitution. The present study aims to research the constitutional architecture of Bessarabia, Bucovina, and Transylvania after the war, to analyze the necessity of adopting, at the time, the new constitutions, and to present the circumstances in which Romania's new fundamental pact was issued by the contribution of the post-war political class
第一次世界大战(1914-1918)的结束将彻底改变欧洲的面貌。帝国分崩离析,在自由主义的“民族原则”的基础上,新的国家从废墟中诞生。其他国家,包括罗马尼亚,通过与以前属于不同帝国的省份联合起来,完成了他们的民族国家。从宪法的角度来看,这些领土的局势相当混乱,至少在起草1923年统一宪法之前是如此。本研究旨在研究战后比萨拉比亚、布科维纳和特兰西瓦尼亚的宪法架构,分析当时采用新宪法的必要性,并呈现罗马尼亚在战后政治阶层的贡献下颁布新的基本公约的情况
{"title":"The provinces united with Romania and the reunification Constitution (1923)","authors":"G. Rusu","doi":"10.47743/rdc-2023-1-0002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.47743/rdc-2023-1-0002","url":null,"abstract":"The end of the First World War (1914-1918) was to completely change the face of Europe. Empires fell apart and from their ashes and new states were born based on the liberal “principle of nationalities”. Other countries, including Romania, completed their national state by uniting with provinces previously belonging various imperial crowns. From a constitutional point of view, the situation in these territories was quite confusing, at least until the drafting of the 1923 Reunification Constitution. The present study aims to research the constitutional architecture of Bessarabia, Bucovina, and Transylvania after the war, to analyze the necessity of adopting, at the time, the new constitutions, and to present the circumstances in which Romania's new fundamental pact was issued by the contribution of the post-war political class","PeriodicalId":421528,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Drept Constituțional","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129810477","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Revista de Drept Constituțional
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1