Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.47743/rdc-2021-1-0004
Sailaja Petikam
Every human being should enjoy right to life. Article 21 of the Indian Constitution as well as under article 3 of International Convention Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948, guaranteed the right to life. Every aspect of right to life has been always subject to consideration of judiciary and depend upon the facts and situations. Right to die is also claimed under this head. Euthanasia is interpreted as 'mercy killing' or 'good death'. It is advocated that there are different situations in which it should be allowed to the person to let him choose his death in place of compelling him living alive. There are different approaches in this regard which either opposes the grant of mercy killing or denies to grant the death as right to die due to some causes. Everyone has the right to live dignified life according to his wish being living into certain limits and it is expected that a human being should struggle also in adverse circumstances around him. He should not lean in front of the situations. The Indian culture gives us such teachings. Hindu religion believes in the eternity of soul. Death is only the way to change a body. The soul never dies, it is eternal. Muslim religion also believes that life should be finished only upon the wish of Allah, it condemns the unnatural ending of life. But in present society in some situations, it is defended that the person should have the right to choose death. Thus, in this context the paper concentrated on the law of euthanasia in India in a legislative perspective and judicial interpretations on euthanasia.
{"title":"EUTHANASIA IN INDIA – LEGISLATIVE PERSPECTIVE","authors":"Sailaja Petikam","doi":"10.47743/rdc-2021-1-0004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.47743/rdc-2021-1-0004","url":null,"abstract":"Every human being should enjoy right to life. Article 21 of the Indian Constitution as well \u0000as under article 3 of International Convention Universal Declaration of Human \u0000Rights, 1948, guaranteed the right to life. Every aspect of right to life has been \u0000always subject to consideration of judiciary and depend upon the facts and \u0000situations. Right to die is also claimed under this head. Euthanasia is interpreted \u0000as 'mercy killing' or 'good death'. It is advocated that there are different \u0000situations in which it should be allowed to the person to let him choose his \u0000death in place of compelling him living alive. There are different approaches in \u0000this regard which either opposes the grant of mercy killing or denies to grant \u0000the death as right to die due to some causes. Everyone has the right to live \u0000dignified life according to his wish being living into certain limits and it is \u0000expected that a human being should struggle also in adverse circumstances \u0000around him. He should not lean in front of the situations. The Indian culture \u0000gives us such teachings. Hindu religion believes in the eternity of soul. Death is \u0000only the way to change a body. The soul never dies, it is eternal. Muslim religion \u0000also believes that life should be finished only upon the wish of Allah, it \u0000condemns the unnatural ending of life. But in present society in some situations, \u0000it is defended that the person should have the right to choose death. Thus, in \u0000this context the paper concentrated on the law of euthanasia in India in a \u0000legislative perspective and judicial interpretations on euthanasia.","PeriodicalId":421528,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Drept Constituțional","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132618666","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.47743/rdc-2021-2-0009
Tejas Hinder
{"title":"The right to life and the marginalized community in India","authors":"Tejas Hinder","doi":"10.47743/rdc-2021-2-0009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.47743/rdc-2021-2-0009","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":421528,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Drept Constituțional","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133218622","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.47743/rdc-2021-2-0003
K. Margaritis
Freedom of religion is a fundamental right of significant importance. Religion or any other belief of similar nature is an integral part to the personality of every person. This being the case, freedom of religion has been aptly described by the European Court of Human Rights as one of the foundations of a democratic society. The impact of religion is a matter of the state-church relations model adopted in each case; a model largely based on social and historical factors. In this paper, the case of the Netherlands will be presented with reference to its constitutional system of protection of religious freedom.
{"title":"Freedom of religion in the Constitution of the Netherlands","authors":"K. Margaritis","doi":"10.47743/rdc-2021-2-0003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.47743/rdc-2021-2-0003","url":null,"abstract":"Freedom of religion is a fundamental right of significant importance. Religion or any other belief of similar nature is an integral part to the personality of every person. This being the case, freedom of religion has been aptly described by the European Court of Human Rights as one of the foundations of a democratic society. The impact of religion is a matter of the state-church relations model adopted in each case; a model largely based on social and historical factors. In this paper, the case of the Netherlands will be presented with reference to its constitutional system of protection of religious freedom.","PeriodicalId":421528,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Drept Constituțional","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116603458","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.47743/rdc-2022-2-0003
Arushi Bhagotra, Tejas Hinder
{"title":"DOBBS V. JACKSON: A CONSTITUTIONAL BREAKDOWN","authors":"Arushi Bhagotra, Tejas Hinder","doi":"10.47743/rdc-2022-2-0003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.47743/rdc-2022-2-0003","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":421528,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Drept Constituțional","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125780857","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.47743/rdc-2021-1-0008
Marieta Safta
Violation of human dignity by failing to regulate guarantees to accompany the adjudication of incapacity. A protective measure such as the adjudication of incapacity must be established only as an ultima ratio, since it is of extreme seriousness, involving the loss of civil rights as a whole. Each time, it should be carefully analyzed, including whether other measures have proved ineffective to support the person’s civil capacity. Therefore, the State must not waive its positive obligation and must provide all necessary support to avoid such an extreme measure. (Decision no. 601 of 16 July 2020, published in the Official Gazette of Romania, Part I, no. 88 of 27 January 2021)
{"title":"THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF ROMANIA (CCR): SELECTION OF CASE LAW JANUARY-JUNE 2021","authors":"Marieta Safta","doi":"10.47743/rdc-2021-1-0008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.47743/rdc-2021-1-0008","url":null,"abstract":"Violation of human dignity by failing to regulate guarantees to accompany the adjudication of incapacity. A protective measure such as the adjudication of incapacity must be established only as an ultima ratio, since it is of extreme seriousness, involving the loss of civil rights as a whole. Each time, it should be carefully analyzed, including whether other measures have proved ineffective to support the person’s civil capacity. Therefore, the State must not waive its positive obligation and must provide all necessary support to avoid such an extreme measure. (Decision no. 601 of 16 July 2020, published in the Official Gazette of Romania, Part I, no. 88 of 27 January 2021)","PeriodicalId":421528,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Drept Constituțional","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126318623","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.47743/rdc-2022-2-0005
Marieta Safta
{"title":"TO BE OR NOT TO BE SELF-RESTRAINT? THE ROLE OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS \u0000IN SHAPING THEIR POWERS AND THE CONSEQUENCES ON CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM","authors":"Marieta Safta","doi":"10.47743/rdc-2022-2-0005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.47743/rdc-2022-2-0005","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":421528,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Drept Constituțional","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129225841","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}