首页 > 最新文献

Vaccine: X最新文献

英文 中文
Cross-country analysis on HPV vaccination behaviors among health workers and parents: a qualitative report from seven middle-income countries 卫生工作者和家长HPV疫苗接种行为的跨国分析:来自七个中等收入国家的定性报告
IF 2.2 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100725
Gulaiim Almatkyzy , Sahil Khan Warsi , Siff Malue Nielsen , Brett J. Craig

Purpose

This article presents a cross-country analysis of qualitative research reports on the barriers and drivers of HPV vaccination-related behavior among parents and health workers in seven middle-income countries using the COM-B theoretical framework. Four reports are from countries that had already introduced the HPV vaccine — Georgia, Moldova, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan, while the other three reports are from Kazakhstan, Kosovo, and Tajikistan which were preparing for HPV vaccine introduction in 2023 and 2024.

Results

The cross-country analysis revealed that health workers (HWs), especially specialists like gynecologists and oncologists, were viewed as trusted sources of vaccination information by both parents and HWs. However, HWs faced gaps in HPV vaccine knowledge and communication skills, and these gaps persisted in some form even after training was conducted in countries that had already introduced the HPV vaccine. In addition, these specialists were not always included when training sessions were conducted with family doctors and nurses in preparation for the vaccine's introduction. Parents also experience knowledge gaps, safety concerns, and lack of trust. Parents across countries shared concerns related to HPV vaccine safety and effectiveness and were often exposed to misconceptions or misinformation through media and social networks. This was compounded by the lack of a strong and confident recommendation from HWs and poor patient-provider communication.

Conclusions

The analyzed reports highlighted the need for tailored, multi-faceted interventions that account for locally specific issues, influencers, and target groups. Two prominent recommendations posited in the reports were: 1) engaging parents and addressing their concerns at the community level, and 2) ensuring HPV vaccine confidence through HW training and engagement, especially for specialists, and providing access to evidence-based information for HWs and others who influence vaccine acceptance.
目的:本文采用COM-B理论框架,对七个中等收入国家的父母和卫生工作者中HPV疫苗接种相关行为的障碍和驱动因素的定性研究报告进行了跨国分析。四份报告来自已经引入人乳头瘤病毒疫苗的国家——格鲁吉亚、摩尔多瓦、土库曼斯坦和乌兹别克斯坦,而另外三份报告来自哈萨克斯坦、科索沃和塔吉克斯坦,这些国家正准备在2023年和2024年引入人乳头瘤病毒疫苗。结果跨国分析显示,卫生工作者(HWs),特别是妇科医生和肿瘤科医生等专家,被家长和卫生工作者视为疫苗接种信息的可靠来源。然而,卫生工作者在人乳头瘤病毒疫苗知识和沟通技巧方面存在差距,即使在已经引进人乳头瘤病毒疫苗的国家开展培训之后,这些差距仍以某种形式存在。此外,在为准备引进疫苗而与家庭医生和护士进行培训时,这些专家并不总是包括在内。父母也会经历知识差距、安全问题和缺乏信任。各国家长都对HPV疫苗的安全性和有效性感到担忧,并经常通过媒体和社交网络接触到误解或错误信息。卫生服务人员缺乏强有力和自信的建议,以及患者与提供者之间沟通不佳,使情况更加复杂。经分析的报告强调,需要针对当地具体问题、影响者和目标群体采取量身定制的多方面干预措施。报告中提出的两项重要建议是:1)让家长参与并在社区层面解决他们的关切;2)通过卫生工作者的培训和参与,特别是对专家的培训和参与,确保对HPV疫苗的信心,并向卫生工作者和其他影响疫苗接受程度的人提供循证信息。
{"title":"Cross-country analysis on HPV vaccination behaviors among health workers and parents: a qualitative report from seven middle-income countries","authors":"Gulaiim Almatkyzy ,&nbsp;Sahil Khan Warsi ,&nbsp;Siff Malue Nielsen ,&nbsp;Brett J. Craig","doi":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100725","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100725","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This article presents a cross-country analysis of qualitative research reports on the barriers and drivers of HPV vaccination-related behavior among parents and health workers in seven middle-income countries using the COM-B theoretical framework. Four reports are from countries that had already introduced the HPV vaccine — Georgia, Moldova, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan, while the other three reports are from Kazakhstan, Kosovo, and Tajikistan which were preparing for HPV vaccine introduction in 2023 and 2024.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The cross-country analysis revealed that health workers (HWs), especially specialists like gynecologists and oncologists, were viewed as trusted sources of vaccination information by both parents and HWs. However, HWs faced gaps in HPV vaccine knowledge and communication skills, and these gaps persisted in some form even after training was conducted in countries that had already introduced the HPV vaccine. In addition, these specialists were not always included when training sessions were conducted with family doctors and nurses in preparation for the vaccine's introduction. Parents also experience knowledge gaps, safety concerns, and lack of trust. Parents across countries shared concerns related to HPV vaccine safety and effectiveness and were often exposed to misconceptions or misinformation through media and social networks. This was compounded by the lack of a strong and confident recommendation from HWs and poor patient-provider communication.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The analyzed reports highlighted the need for tailored, multi-faceted interventions that account for locally specific issues, influencers, and target groups. Two prominent recommendations posited in the reports were: 1) engaging parents and addressing their concerns at the community level, and 2) ensuring HPV vaccine confidence through HW training and engagement, especially for specialists, and providing access to evidence-based information for HWs and others who influence vaccine acceptance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":43021,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine: X","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 100725"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145107531","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Phase 2/3 open-label study on NVX-CoV-2601 (XBB.1.5) vaccine in previously COVID-19 mRNA vaccinated and vaccine-naive, SARS-CoV-2–seropositive participants: A 6-month follow-up NVX-CoV-2601 (XBB.1.5)疫苗在先前接种过COVID-19 mRNA疫苗和未接种疫苗的sars - cov -2血清阳性参与者中的2/3期开放标签研究:6个月随访
IF 2.2 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100728
Katia Alves , Karen Kotloff , R. Scott McClelland , E. Adrianne Hammershaimb , Alex Kouassi , Joyce S. Plested , Raj Kalkeri , Mingzhu Zhu , Shane Cloney-Clark , Zhaohui Cai , Katherine Smith , Muneer Kaba , Joy Nelson , Raburn M. Mallory , Fernando Noriega , on behalf of the 2019nCoV-313 Study Investigators

Background

Seasonal (2023–2024) COVID-19 vaccine recommendations included updates against Omicron XBB.1.5. NVX-CoV2601 contains XBB.1.5 recombinant spike (rS) protein, Matrix-M® adjuvant, and is based on authorized prototype vaccine (NVX-CoV2373) technology. Immunogenicity and safety outcomes 6 months after vaccination following a single dose of monovalent NVX-CoV2601 in previously vaccinated and vaccine-naive, SARS-CoV-2–seropositive participants aged ≥18 years are reported here.

Methods

The phase 2/3 open-label, single-arm 2019nCoV-313 study consisted of two parts (part 1: participants with ≥3 prior mRNA vaccines; part 2: unvaccinated participants with a clinical history of COVID-19). Participants received a single dose of NVX-CoV2601. Primary endpoint analyses through day 28 were previously published. This final analysis assessed immunogenicity and safety through the end of the study (day 180). Immunogenicity data (e.g., neutralizing antibodies [nAbs] and anti-rS IgG antibodies) were summarized using geometric mean antibody levels and fold rise and seroresponse rate (SRR).

Results

The safety analysis set included 332 participants in part 1 and 338 participants in part 2. In previously vaccinated participants, nAb geometric mean titers (GMTs; 95% CIs) were 120.7 (101.5–143.6) at day 0, increased to 955.5 (814.0–1121.4) at day 28, and decreased to 454.8 (382.9–540.3) at day 180. SRR decreased from 64.3% at day 28 to 41.1% at day 180. Similar results were seen in vaccine-naive, SARS-CoV-2–seropositive participants, with GMTs of 67.0 (56.6–79.3), 1296.7 (1082.6–1553.2), and 303.6 (258.5–356.4) at day 0, 28, and 180, respectively. SRR waned from 74.3% at day 28 to 45.0% at day 180. Anti-rS IgG responses similarly increased at day 28 and had moderate decreases at day 180 in both groups. No new safety signals were reported.

Conclusions

A single dose of NVX-CoV2601 showed robust, durable immunogenicity in adult participants from study 2019nCoV-313 parts 1 and 2. These data support the use of NVX-CoV2601 in both populations.
Trial registration: NCT05975060
季节性(2023-2024)COVID-19疫苗建议包括针对Omicron XBB.1.5的更新。NVX-CoV2601含有XBB.1.5重组spike (rS)蛋白,Matrix-M®佐剂,基于授权原型疫苗(NVX-CoV2373)技术。本文报告了年龄≥18岁、先前接种过疫苗和未接种疫苗的sars - cov -2血清阳性受试者接种单剂量单价NVX-CoV2601疫苗后6个月的免疫原性和安全性结果。方法2/3期开放标签单臂2019nCoV-313研究由两部分组成(第一部分:既往接种过≥3种mRNA疫苗的参与者;第二部分:未接种过COVID-19临床史的参与者)。参与者接受单剂量的NVX-CoV2601。截至第28天的主要终点分析之前已发表。最后的分析评估了研究结束时(第180天)的免疫原性和安全性。免疫原性数据(例如,中和抗体[nab]和抗rs IgG抗体)采用几何平均抗体水平、倍数上升和血清反应率(SRR)进行总结。结果第一部分共纳入332名受试者,第二部分共纳入338名受试者。在先前接种过疫苗的参与者中,nAb几何平均滴度(GMTs; 95% ci)在第0天为120.7(101.5-143.6),在第28天增加到955.5(814.0-1121.4),在第180天下降到454.8(382.9-540.3)。SRR由第28天的64.3%降至第180天的41.1%。在未接种疫苗的sars - cov -2血清阳性参与者中也观察到类似的结果,在第0、28和180天,GMTs分别为67.0(56.6-79.3)、1296.7(1082.6-1553.2)和303.6(258.5-356.4)。SRR从第28天的74.3%下降到第180天的45.0%。两组抗rs IgG反应在第28天同样增加,在第180天有中度下降。没有新的安全信号报道。结论单剂量NVX-CoV2601在研究2019nCoV-313第1部分和第2部分的成人受试者中显示出强大、持久的免疫原性。这些数据支持在两种人群中使用NVX-CoV2601。试验注册:NCT05975060
{"title":"Phase 2/3 open-label study on NVX-CoV-2601 (XBB.1.5) vaccine in previously COVID-19 mRNA vaccinated and vaccine-naive, SARS-CoV-2–seropositive participants: A 6-month follow-up","authors":"Katia Alves ,&nbsp;Karen Kotloff ,&nbsp;R. Scott McClelland ,&nbsp;E. Adrianne Hammershaimb ,&nbsp;Alex Kouassi ,&nbsp;Joyce S. Plested ,&nbsp;Raj Kalkeri ,&nbsp;Mingzhu Zhu ,&nbsp;Shane Cloney-Clark ,&nbsp;Zhaohui Cai ,&nbsp;Katherine Smith ,&nbsp;Muneer Kaba ,&nbsp;Joy Nelson ,&nbsp;Raburn M. Mallory ,&nbsp;Fernando Noriega ,&nbsp;on behalf of the 2019nCoV-313 Study Investigators","doi":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100728","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100728","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Seasonal (2023–2024) COVID-19 vaccine recommendations included updates against Omicron XBB.1.5. NVX-CoV2601 contains XBB.1.5 recombinant spike (rS) protein, Matrix-M® adjuvant, and is based on authorized prototype vaccine (NVX-CoV2373) technology. Immunogenicity and safety outcomes 6 months after vaccination following a single dose of monovalent NVX-CoV2601 in previously vaccinated and vaccine-naive, SARS-CoV-2–seropositive participants aged ≥18 years are reported here.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The phase 2/3 open-label, single-arm 2019nCoV-313 study consisted of two parts (part 1: participants with ≥3 prior mRNA vaccines; part 2: unvaccinated participants with a clinical history of COVID-19). Participants received a single dose of NVX-CoV2601. Primary endpoint analyses through day 28 were previously published. This final analysis assessed immunogenicity and safety through the end of the study (day 180). Immunogenicity data (e.g., neutralizing antibodies [nAbs] and anti-rS IgG antibodies) were summarized using geometric mean antibody levels and fold rise and seroresponse rate (SRR).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The safety analysis set included 332 participants in part 1 and 338 participants in part 2. In previously vaccinated participants, nAb geometric mean titers (GMTs; 95% CIs) were 120.7 (101.5–143.6) at day 0, increased to 955.5 (814.0–1121.4) at day 28, and decreased to 454.8 (382.9–540.3) at day 180. SRR decreased from 64.3% at day 28 to 41.1% at day 180. Similar results were seen in vaccine-naive, SARS-CoV-2–seropositive participants, with GMTs of 67.0 (56.6–79.3), 1296.7 (1082.6–1553.2), and 303.6 (258.5–356.4) at day 0, 28, and 180, respectively. SRR waned from 74.3% at day 28 to 45.0% at day 180. Anti-rS IgG responses similarly increased at day 28 and had moderate decreases at day 180 in both groups. No new safety signals were reported.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A single dose of NVX-CoV2601 showed robust, durable immunogenicity in adult participants from study 2019nCoV-313 parts 1 and 2. These data support the use of NVX-CoV2601 in both populations.</div><div><em>Trial registration:</em> <span><span>NCT05975060</span><svg><path></path></svg></span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":43021,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine: X","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 100728"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145110002","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Current landscape and challenges in adjuvant and antigen delivery systems for vaccine 疫苗佐剂和抗原递送系统的现状和挑战
IF 2.2 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100735
Xiaoyi Fu
Vaccines have emerged as a prominent strategy for the prevention and treatment of diseases. Adjuvants, as immune enhancers and delivery systems, play a crucial role in improving the efficiency and effectiveness of vaccines. Adjuvants can be categorized into three groups based on their mechanisms: immune enhancers, delivery systems, and a combination of both. While aluminum salt-based adjuvants have been the long-standing choice for many commercial vaccines, the adjuvant landscape in FDA-approved vaccines has evolved. Emulsions, liposomes, virus-like particles (VLPs), and newer platforms have been integrated into specialized vaccine formulations. In the context of modern vaccine platforms, the need for optimized adjuvant-delivery systems is increasing. For messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines, lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) serve as efficient delivery vehicles, enhancing mRNA stability and cellular uptake. Additionally, LNPs can also function as immune-activating adjuvants, which further enhance the immune response. Similarly, viral vector vaccines leverage adjuvants that improve immune activation, while DNA vaccines benefit from adjuvants that promote both antigen stability and uptake. Emerging systems, such as bacterial outer membrane vesicles (OMVs), programmable nanoparticles (responsive to pH, enzymes, or light), and cell membrane-coated systems (e.g., red blood cell or macrophage membranes), offer advanced ways to enhance vaccine delivery and immune responses. These systems also enable better targeting and control of immune activation, addressing challenges in immune memory and long-lasting vaccine efficacy. However, the development of adjuvant systems also faces safety concerns, including the potential for excessive immune activation and toxicity in certain populations. Overall, this review discusses the current and evolving landscape of adjuvant-delivery systems for vaccines, with an emphasis on systems that support diverse vaccine platforms and optimize immune balance, biocompatibility, and long-term immunity, crucial for the success of future vaccine development.
疫苗已成为预防和治疗疾病的一项重要战略。佐剂作为免疫增强剂和递送系统,在提高疫苗的效率和有效性方面起着至关重要的作用。佐剂可根据其机制分为三组:免疫增强剂、输送系统和两者的组合。虽然铝盐基佐剂一直是许多商业疫苗的长期选择,但fda批准的疫苗中的佐剂景观已经发生了变化。乳剂、脂质体、病毒样颗粒(vlp)和更新的平台已被整合到专门的疫苗配方中。在现代疫苗平台的背景下,对优化佐剂递送系统的需求正在增加。对于信使RNA (mRNA)疫苗,脂质纳米颗粒(LNPs)作为有效的递送载体,增强mRNA的稳定性和细胞摄取。此外,LNPs还可以作为免疫激活佐剂,进一步增强免疫应答。同样,病毒载体疫苗利用佐剂改善免疫激活,而DNA疫苗受益于佐剂促进抗原稳定性和摄取。新兴系统,如细菌外膜囊泡(omv)、可编程纳米颗粒(对pH值、酶或光有反应)和细胞膜包覆系统(如红细胞或巨噬细胞膜),为增强疫苗递送和免疫反应提供了先进的方法。这些系统还能够更好地靶向和控制免疫激活,解决免疫记忆和持久疫苗功效方面的挑战。然而,佐剂系统的发展也面临着安全问题,包括在某些人群中过度免疫激活和毒性的可能性。总之,本综述讨论了疫苗佐剂递送系统的现状和发展前景,重点是支持多种疫苗平台和优化免疫平衡、生物相容性和长期免疫的系统,这对未来疫苗开发的成功至关重要。
{"title":"Current landscape and challenges in adjuvant and antigen delivery systems for vaccine","authors":"Xiaoyi Fu","doi":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100735","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100735","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Vaccines have emerged as a prominent strategy for the prevention and treatment of diseases. Adjuvants, as immune enhancers and delivery systems, play a crucial role in improving the efficiency and effectiveness of vaccines. Adjuvants can be categorized into three groups based on their mechanisms: immune enhancers, delivery systems, and a combination of both. While aluminum salt-based adjuvants have been the long-standing choice for many commercial vaccines, the adjuvant landscape in FDA-approved vaccines has evolved. Emulsions, liposomes, virus-like particles (VLPs), and newer platforms have been integrated into specialized vaccine formulations. In the context of modern vaccine platforms, the need for optimized adjuvant-delivery systems is increasing. For messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines, lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) serve as efficient delivery vehicles, enhancing mRNA stability and cellular uptake. Additionally, LNPs can also function as immune-activating adjuvants, which further enhance the immune response. Similarly, viral vector vaccines leverage adjuvants that improve immune activation, while DNA vaccines benefit from adjuvants that promote both antigen stability and uptake. Emerging systems, such as bacterial outer membrane vesicles (OMVs), programmable nanoparticles (responsive to pH, enzymes, or light), and cell membrane-coated systems (e.g., red blood cell or macrophage membranes), offer advanced ways to enhance vaccine delivery and immune responses. These systems also enable better targeting and control of immune activation, addressing challenges in immune memory and long-lasting vaccine efficacy. However, the development of adjuvant systems also faces safety concerns, including the potential for excessive immune activation and toxicity in certain populations. Overall, this review discusses the current and evolving landscape of adjuvant-delivery systems for vaccines, with an emphasis on systems that support diverse vaccine platforms and optimize immune balance, biocompatibility, and long-term immunity, crucial for the success of future vaccine development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":43021,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine: X","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 100735"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145221120","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Real-world data and clinical management experience in passive immunization for respiratory syncytial virus prevention in children 儿童呼吸道合胞病毒被动免疫预防的实际数据和临床管理经验
IF 2.2 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100731
Yongping Xie, Xin Cong, Yan Li, Lisu Huang
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of acute lower respiratory tract infections in children under 5 years of age worldwide. Currently, there are no approved curative treatments, and clinical management remains primarily focused on symptomatic support. As a result, preventive strategies are crucial for controlling RSV infections. Recent advancements have been made in the development of monoclonal antibody therapies aimed at protecting infants and young children from RSV. This review explores the application and real-world outcomes of passive immunization strategies in various international settings, particularly in developed countries, with a focus on their effectiveness and safety. The findings are intended to offer insights into the potential use of RSV passive immunization agents in developing countries.
呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)是全世界5岁以下儿童急性下呼吸道感染的主要原因。目前,尚无批准的治愈性治疗方法,临床管理仍主要侧重于对症支持。因此,预防策略对于控制呼吸道合胞病毒感染至关重要。最近在开发旨在保护婴幼儿免受RSV感染的单克隆抗体疗法方面取得了进展。本综述探讨了被动免疫策略在各种国际环境中的应用和实际结果,特别是在发达国家,重点是其有效性和安全性。这些发现旨在为RSV被动免疫制剂在发展中国家的潜在使用提供见解。
{"title":"Real-world data and clinical management experience in passive immunization for respiratory syncytial virus prevention in children","authors":"Yongping Xie,&nbsp;Xin Cong,&nbsp;Yan Li,&nbsp;Lisu Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100731","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100731","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of acute lower respiratory tract infections in children under 5 years of age worldwide. Currently, there are no approved curative treatments, and clinical management remains primarily focused on symptomatic support. As a result, preventive strategies are crucial for controlling RSV infections. Recent advancements have been made in the development of monoclonal antibody therapies aimed at protecting infants and young children from RSV. This review explores the application and real-world outcomes of passive immunization strategies in various international settings, particularly in developed countries, with a focus on their effectiveness and safety. The findings are intended to offer insights into the potential use of RSV passive immunization agents in developing countries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":43021,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine: X","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 100731"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145221121","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effectiveness of vaccine dosing schedules for pneumococcal invasive disease in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis 儿童肺炎球菌侵袭性疾病疫苗剂量计划的有效性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
IF 2.2 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100734
Chia-Yuan Chang , Sharifa Nasreen , Manish Sadarangani , Kenny Aquino , Jacquelyn J. Cragg , Fawziah Marra

Objectives

Invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) persists despite the effectiveness of 7-valent and 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV). As the protection offered by different dosing regimens remains uncertain, we evaluated the vaccine effectiveness (VE) against vaccine-type (VT) IPD in children based on the number of vaccine doses.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE/Embase/Web of Science/CENTRAL databases from January 2000 to December 2024 for studies on PCV7 and/or PCV13 VE against VT-IPD in children ≤18 years. VE estimates were recorded by vaccination status at IPD onset, classified into four groups (1) primary + booster group (1–3 primary doses <12 months of age plus 1 booster dose ≥12 months), (2) 1 primary dose group, (3) 2 primary doses group, and (4) 3 primary doses group (primary doses given <12 months of age and no booster).

Results

From 1982 studies, 25 studies were included, reporting 525 cases in the primary + booster group and 821 cases in the 1–3 primary dose(s) groups. Pooled VE from 14 studies was 94.4 % for the primary + booster group, and 66.8 %, 78.8 %, and 82.0 % for the 1-, 2-, and 3- primary dose(s) groups, respectively. Among VT-IPD breakthrough cases, serotype 19A was most common (27.9 %), followed by 19F (20.5 %) and 3 (18.9 %). Sensitivity analyses showed a VE of ∼95 % for the 2 + 1 and 3 + 1 schedules, versus 78.9 % for 3 + 0.

Conclusions

Our findings strongly support schedules that include a booster dose, such as the 2 + 1 regimen, as an optimal strategy for preventing VT-IPD in children.
目的:尽管7价和13价肺炎球菌结合疫苗(PCV)有效,但侵袭性肺炎球菌病(IPD)仍然存在。由于不同剂量方案提供的保护仍然不确定,我们根据疫苗剂量数评估了疫苗对儿童疫苗型IPD的有效性(VE)。方法检索MEDLINE/Embase/Web of Science/CENTRAL数据库,检索2000年1月至2024年12月PCV7和/或PCV13 VE在≤18岁儿童中抗VT-IPD的相关研究。根据IPD发病时的疫苗接种情况记录VE估计值,分为四组(1)初级+加强组(1 - 3次初级剂量+ 1次≥12个月的加强剂量),(2)1次初级剂量组,(3)2次初级剂量组,(4)3次初级剂量组(给予初级剂量+ 12个月的年龄,无加强剂量)。结果从1982年的研究中,纳入了25项研究,报告了525例原发性+加强剂组和821例1-3次原发性剂量组。从14项研究中汇总的VE,一次+加强剂组为94.4%,1、2、3次一次剂量组分别为66.8%、78.8%和82.0%。VT-IPD突破病例中以19A型最多见(27.9%),其次为19F型(20.5%)和3型(18.9%)。敏感性分析显示,2 + 1和3 + 1方案的VE为~ 95%,而3 + 0方案的VE为78.9%。结论:我们的研究结果强烈支持包括加强剂量的方案,如2 + 1方案,作为预防儿童VT-IPD的最佳策略。
{"title":"Effectiveness of vaccine dosing schedules for pneumococcal invasive disease in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Chia-Yuan Chang ,&nbsp;Sharifa Nasreen ,&nbsp;Manish Sadarangani ,&nbsp;Kenny Aquino ,&nbsp;Jacquelyn J. Cragg ,&nbsp;Fawziah Marra","doi":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100734","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100734","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) persists despite the effectiveness of 7-valent and 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV). As the protection offered by different dosing regimens remains uncertain, we evaluated the vaccine effectiveness (VE) against vaccine-type (VT) IPD in children based on the number of vaccine doses.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We searched MEDLINE/Embase/Web of Science/CENTRAL databases from January 2000 to December 2024 for studies on PCV7 and/or PCV13 VE against VT-IPD in children ≤18 years. VE estimates were recorded by vaccination status at IPD onset, classified into four groups (1) primary + booster group (1–3 primary doses &lt;12 months of age plus 1 booster dose ≥12 months), (2) 1 primary dose group, (3) 2 primary doses group, and (4) 3 primary doses group (primary doses given &lt;12 months of age and no booster).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From 1982 studies, 25 studies were included, reporting 525 cases in the primary + booster group and 821 cases in the 1–3 primary dose(s) groups. Pooled VE from 14 studies was 94.4 % for the primary + booster group, and 66.8 %, 78.8 %, and 82.0 % for the 1-, 2-, and 3- primary dose(s) groups, respectively. Among VT-IPD breakthrough cases, serotype 19A was most common (27.9 %), followed by 19F (20.5 %) and 3 (18.9 %). Sensitivity analyses showed a VE of ∼95 % for the 2 + 1 and 3 + 1 schedules, versus 78.9 % for 3 + 0.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our findings strongly support schedules that include a booster dose, such as the 2 + 1 regimen, as an optimal strategy for preventing VT-IPD in children.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":43021,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine: X","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 100734"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145159113","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Corrigendum to “The effect of the TBE vaccination program in the Åland Islands” [Vaccine: X 27 (2025) 100727] “ Åland群岛流行性乙型脑炎疫苗接种方案的效果”的勘误表[疫苗:X 27 (2025) 100727]
IF 2.2 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100746
Tove Hoffman , Bo Albinsson , Linda Kolstad , Marika Nordberg , Sirkka Vene , Patrik Ellström , Bengt Rönnberg , Olli Vapalahti , Dag Nyman , Åke Lundkvist
{"title":"Corrigendum to “The effect of the TBE vaccination program in the Åland Islands” [Vaccine: X 27 (2025) 100727]","authors":"Tove Hoffman ,&nbsp;Bo Albinsson ,&nbsp;Linda Kolstad ,&nbsp;Marika Nordberg ,&nbsp;Sirkka Vene ,&nbsp;Patrik Ellström ,&nbsp;Bengt Rönnberg ,&nbsp;Olli Vapalahti ,&nbsp;Dag Nyman ,&nbsp;Åke Lundkvist","doi":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100746","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100746","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43021,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine: X","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 100746"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145690359","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Robust and sustained immunity in beagles following one single nasal administration of H3N2 canine influenza virus-like particle 小猎犬在单次鼻腔注射H3N2犬流感病毒样颗粒后产生强大和持续的免疫
IF 2.2 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100739
Fei-fei Ge , Li-ping Shen , De-quan Yang, Hai-xiao Shen, Xin Li, Jian Liu, Jian Wang, Hongjin Zhao
In this study, we used baculovirus to express hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) to prepare a novel genotype of H3N2 canine influenza virus particles (VLPs). The effectiveness of the H3N2 VLP vaccine was evaluated by detecting HI antibodies, the antiviral protection rate, antibody persistence and anatomical examination of the lungs.A challenge model has been established in a previous study for the study of canine influenza virus-like particle vaccines. A/Canine/Shanghai/0103/2019, with a challenge dose of 106 EID50, infects 10-week-old healthy beagle dogs through nasal instillation and can cause severe clinical symptoms. Using a single dose of VLP vaccine for beagle dogs, the vaccine was tested at titers of 26 intranasally and 26 intramuscularly. One week after a single immunization, the HI titer promptly reached 28 among the immunized groups. The duration of antibody can persist for four months. We differentiated between CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the peripheral blood. Four weeks after the single immunization, all beagles except those in the noninfected and nonimmunized groups were intranasally challenged with live H3N2 virus (1 × 106 EID50). All immunized beagles shed no virus at d 1–4 post-challenge. After the challenge, the placebo control beagles shed the virus on d 1 post-challenge (105.85±0.071 EID50). An anatomical examination of the lungs revealed that visible lesions were rarely detected in the lungs of the nasal immunization group, and the lungs were as healthy as those of the noninfected and nonimmunized groups were. The lung surfaces presented visible bleeding spots in the intramuscular immunization group and placebo-control group. Their effectiveness will provide a scientific basis for the promotion and use of these products.
本研究利用杆状病毒表达血凝素(HA)和神经氨酸酶(NA),制备了新型H3N2犬流感病毒颗粒(VLPs)。通过检测H3N2 VLP疫苗的HI抗体、抗病毒保护率、抗体持久性和肺部解剖检查来评价疫苗的有效性。在先前的一项研究中,已经建立了一个攻击模型,用于研究犬流感病毒样颗粒疫苗。A/Canine/Shanghai/0103/2019的攻毒剂量为106 EID50,通过鼻腔注入感染10周龄的健康比格犬,并可引起严重的临床症状。使用比格犬的单剂量VLP疫苗,测试了26滴鼻内和26滴肌肉注射疫苗。单次免疫后一周,免疫组的HI滴度迅速达到28。抗体持续时间可达4个月。我们将外周血中的CD4+ T细胞和CD8+ T细胞区分开来。单次免疫4周后,除未感染组和未免疫组外,所有比格犬均经鼻感染H3N2活病毒(1 × 106 EID50)。所有免疫的小猎犬在攻击后1-4天没有病毒脱落。攻毒后,安慰剂对照的小猎犬在攻毒后第1天排出病毒(105.85±0.071 EID50)。肺部解剖检查显示,鼻腔免疫组肺部很少发现明显病变,肺部与未感染和未免疫组一样健康。肌注免疫组和安慰剂对照组肺表面出现明显的出血斑点。其有效性将为这些产品的推广和使用提供科学依据。
{"title":"Robust and sustained immunity in beagles following one single nasal administration of H3N2 canine influenza virus-like particle","authors":"Fei-fei Ge ,&nbsp;Li-ping Shen ,&nbsp;De-quan Yang,&nbsp;Hai-xiao Shen,&nbsp;Xin Li,&nbsp;Jian Liu,&nbsp;Jian Wang,&nbsp;Hongjin Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100739","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100739","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this study, we used baculovirus to express hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) to prepare a novel genotype of H3N2 canine influenza virus particles (VLPs). The effectiveness of the H3N2 VLP vaccine was evaluated by detecting HI antibodies, the antiviral protection rate, antibody persistence and anatomical examination of the lungs.A challenge model has been established in a previous study for the study of canine influenza virus-like particle vaccines. A/Canine/Shanghai/0103/2019, with a challenge dose of 10<sup>6</sup> EID<sub>50</sub>, infects 10-week-old healthy beagle dogs through nasal instillation and can cause severe clinical symptoms. Using a single dose of VLP vaccine for beagle dogs, the vaccine was tested at titers of 2<sup>6</sup> intranasally and 2<sup>6</sup> intramuscularly. One week after a single immunization, the HI titer promptly reached 2<sup>8</sup> among the immunized groups. The duration of antibody can persist for four months. We differentiated between CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the peripheral blood. Four weeks after the single immunization, all beagles except those in the noninfected and nonimmunized groups were intranasally challenged with live H3N2 virus (1 × 10<sup>6</sup> EID<sub>50</sub>). All immunized beagles shed no virus at d 1–4 post-challenge. After the challenge, the placebo control beagles shed the virus on d 1 post-challenge (10<sup>5.85±0.071</sup> EID<sub>50</sub>). An anatomical examination of the lungs revealed that visible lesions were rarely detected in the lungs of the nasal immunization group, and the lungs were as healthy as those of the noninfected and nonimmunized groups were. The lung surfaces presented visible bleeding spots in the intramuscular immunization group and placebo-control group. Their effectiveness will provide a scientific basis for the promotion and use of these products.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":43021,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine: X","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 100739"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145325796","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Variations in vaccination coverage by social care need: a scoping review 社会保健需求对疫苗接种覆盖率的影响:范围审查
IF 2.2 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100754
Arun Dahil, David Hardisty, Glenn Simpson, Hajira Dambha-Miller

Background

Vaccination rates vary in the UK population but are vital in maintaining public health. Social care needs (SCN) refer to the promotion of independence and wellbeing, particularly in those who may have a disability, be socially isolated, or endure economic stress. Variations in SCN may impact vaccine uptake, thereby affecting vaccination coverage, but this is poorly understood.

Aim

We aim in our study to collate and interpret existing evidence on the variations in vaccination coverage among individuals with SCN.

Methods

Searches were conducted using Medline, Embase, Cochrane, CINAHL, and Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE) from inception to June 27, 2024. Grey literature was also searched. Two authors independently screened and extracted relevant papers, with disagreements resolved by a third author. The search terms used included: “vaccination AND social need AND immunisation”, and variations of these terms.

Results

We identified 606 articles with 32 meeting the inclusion criteria following full-text screening. Studies originated from various regions, with most conducted in the USA. Key SCN identified as barriers to vaccination included access issues, limited information, social vulnerability, and economic deprivation. Vaccines most affected included influenza, pneumonia, and HPV.

Conclusions

Our review collated evidence on vaccination uptake variations in relation to SCN, finding a limited body of research, primarily from the USA. Most studies indicated lower vaccine uptake among individuals with SCN. Greater understanding of these variations could inform improved vaccination uptake, especially in high-risk groups. Further research is needed to identify effective interventions to address these disparities in vaccination coverage.
英国人口的疫苗接种率各不相同,但对维护公众健康至关重要。社会关怀需求(Social care needs, SCN)是指促进独立和福祉,特别是那些可能有残疾、被社会孤立或承受经济压力的人。SCN的变化可能会影响疫苗的摄取,从而影响疫苗接种的覆盖率,但这一点尚不清楚。在我们的研究中,我们的目的是整理和解释SCN个体中疫苗接种覆盖率变化的现有证据。方法使用Medline、Embase、Cochrane、CINAHL和Bielefeld学术搜索引擎(BASE)进行检索,检索时间自成立至2024年6月27日。灰色文献也被检索。两位作者独立筛选和提取相关论文,分歧由第三位作者解决。使用的搜索词包括:“疫苗接种和社会需求和免疫接种”,以及这些词的变体。结果通过全文筛选,共纳入606篇文献,其中32篇符合纳入标准。研究来自不同地区,其中大多数在美国进行。被确定为疫苗接种障碍的关键SCN包括获取问题、信息有限、社会脆弱性和经济剥夺。受影响最大的疫苗包括流感、肺炎和人乳头瘤病毒。我们的综述整理了疫苗摄取变化与SCN相关的证据,发现主要来自美国的有限研究机构。大多数研究表明,SCN患者的疫苗接种率较低。更好地了解这些变异可以提高疫苗接种率,特别是在高危人群中。需要进一步研究确定有效的干预措施,以解决疫苗接种覆盖率方面的这些差异。
{"title":"Variations in vaccination coverage by social care need: a scoping review","authors":"Arun Dahil,&nbsp;David Hardisty,&nbsp;Glenn Simpson,&nbsp;Hajira Dambha-Miller","doi":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100754","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100754","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Vaccination rates vary in the UK population but are vital in maintaining public health. Social care needs (SCN) refer to the promotion of independence and wellbeing, particularly in those who may have a disability, be socially isolated, or endure economic stress. Variations in SCN may impact vaccine uptake, thereby affecting vaccination coverage, but this is poorly understood.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>We aim in our study to collate and interpret existing evidence on the variations in vaccination coverage among individuals with SCN.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Searches were conducted using Medline, Embase, Cochrane, CINAHL, and Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE) from inception to June 27, 2024. Grey literature was also searched. Two authors independently screened and extracted relevant papers, with disagreements resolved by a third author. The search terms used included: “vaccination AND social need AND immunisation”, and variations of these terms.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 606 articles with 32 meeting the inclusion criteria following full-text screening. Studies originated from various regions, with most conducted in the USA. Key SCN identified as barriers to vaccination included access issues, limited information, social vulnerability, and economic deprivation. Vaccines most affected included influenza, pneumonia, and HPV.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our review collated evidence on vaccination uptake variations in relation to SCN, finding a limited body of research, primarily from the USA. Most studies indicated lower vaccine uptake among individuals with SCN. Greater understanding of these variations could inform improved vaccination uptake, especially in high-risk groups. Further research is needed to identify effective interventions to address these disparities in vaccination coverage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":43021,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine: X","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 100754"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145578868","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A qualitative study on vaccination program accessibility for the elderly and medical risk groups in the south of the Netherlands 荷兰南部老年人和医疗风险群体疫苗接种计划可及性的定性研究
IF 2.2 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100713
May Nhu Vu , Tjalke Arend Westra , Mickael Hiligsmann
Elderly and medical risk patients face an increased risk of vaccine-preventable infectious diseases. However, their vaccination rates are on a decreasing trend in the Netherlands, contrary to public health recommendations. The current vaccination landscape for Dutch adults is complex, with separate programs and many stakeholders involved such as general practitioners (GP), municipal public health (GGD), and hospital specialists. This contributes to reduced access and vaccination rates. This study sought to gain stakeholder insight on how to improve the accessibility and sustainability of vaccine programs for the elderly and medical risk population in Limburg. Nine semi-structured interviews with vaccination stakeholders such as GPs, GGD, academic experts, specialist doctors and patient organizations were conducted. Four vaccine accessibility themes were identified: barriers to access, Limburg particularities, stakeholder roles and responsibilities, and adjustments to improve access and sustainability. Key barriers were vaccine hesitancy, program rigidity and fragmentation, lack of a data-sharing system, complex reimbursement, lack of stakeholder collaboration and trust, and complacency of different parties. Particularities of Limburg that should be considered are its geographical uniqueness and lower education and socioeconomic conditions. Finally, potential improvements were also identified, mainly: centralising to one vaccination stakeholder through GP and GGD collaboration, improving communication to patients, creating a patient data-sharing system, and maximising vaccination opportunities and convenience. Stakeholders held diverse perspectives on barriers to vaccination access. However, their views converged on centralisation at GGD and collaboration with GPs, a solution that may eliminate their weaknesses and combine their strengths. A focus on how to increase collaboration with GPs, trust, and convenience while centralising vaccination is to be prioritised in future research. Furthermore, an online vaccine registry and patient data-sharing system is desired by all parties. These solutions have the potential to reduce program fragmentation, enhance patient convenience and ultimately increase vaccine uptake among high-risk Dutch adult populations.
老年人和医疗风险患者患疫苗可预防传染病的风险增加。然而,与公共卫生建议相反,他们的疫苗接种率在荷兰呈下降趋势。目前荷兰成人的疫苗接种情况很复杂,有独立的项目和许多利益相关者,如全科医生(GP)、市政公共卫生(GGD)和医院专家。这有助于降低获取和疫苗接种率。本研究旨在获得利益相关者对如何提高林堡老年人和医疗风险人群疫苗计划的可及性和可持续性的见解。与全科医生、GGD、学术专家、专科医生和患者组织等疫苗接种利益相关者进行了9次半结构化访谈。确定了四个疫苗可及性主题:可及性障碍、林堡特殊性、利益攸关方的作用和责任,以及为改善可及性和可持续性而进行的调整。主要障碍是疫苗犹豫、规划僵化和碎片化、缺乏数据共享系统、复杂的报销、利益攸关方缺乏协作和信任以及各方的自满。林堡的特殊性应该考虑到它的地理独特性和较低的教育和社会经济条件。最后,还确定了潜在的改进,主要是:通过GP和GGD合作将疫苗接种利益相关者集中到一个疫苗接种利益相关者身上,改善与患者的沟通,创建患者数据共享系统,最大限度地提高疫苗接种机会和便利性。利益攸关方对获得疫苗接种的障碍持不同观点。然而,他们的观点集中在GGD的集中化和与全科医生的合作上,这一解决方案可能会消除他们的弱点,并结合他们的优势。在集中接种疫苗的同时,如何加强与全科医生的合作、信任和便利将是未来研究的重点。此外,各方都希望建立一个在线疫苗注册和患者数据共享系统。这些解决方案有可能减少项目的碎片化,提高患者的便利性,并最终增加高危荷兰成年人群的疫苗接种率。
{"title":"A qualitative study on vaccination program accessibility for the elderly and medical risk groups in the south of the Netherlands","authors":"May Nhu Vu ,&nbsp;Tjalke Arend Westra ,&nbsp;Mickael Hiligsmann","doi":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100713","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100713","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Elderly and medical risk patients face an increased risk of vaccine-preventable infectious diseases. However, their vaccination rates are on a decreasing trend in the Netherlands, contrary to public health recommendations. The current vaccination landscape for Dutch adults is complex, with separate programs and many stakeholders involved such as general practitioners (GP), municipal public health (GGD), and hospital specialists. This contributes to reduced access and vaccination rates. This study sought to gain stakeholder insight on how to improve the accessibility and sustainability of vaccine programs for the elderly and medical risk population in Limburg. Nine semi-structured interviews with vaccination stakeholders such as GPs, GGD, academic experts, specialist doctors and patient organizations were conducted. Four vaccine accessibility themes were identified: barriers to access, Limburg particularities, stakeholder roles and responsibilities, and adjustments to improve access and sustainability. Key barriers were vaccine hesitancy, program rigidity and fragmentation, lack of a data-sharing system, complex reimbursement, lack of stakeholder collaboration and trust, and complacency of different parties. Particularities of Limburg that should be considered are its geographical uniqueness and lower education and socioeconomic conditions. Finally, potential improvements were also identified, mainly: centralising to one vaccination stakeholder through GP and GGD collaboration, improving communication to patients, creating a patient data-sharing system, and maximising vaccination opportunities and convenience. Stakeholders held diverse perspectives on barriers to vaccination access. However, their views converged on centralisation at GGD and collaboration with GPs, a solution that may eliminate their weaknesses and combine their strengths. A focus on how to increase collaboration with GPs, trust, and convenience while centralising vaccination is to be prioritised in future research. Furthermore, an online vaccine registry and patient data-sharing system is desired by all parties. These solutions have the potential to reduce program fragmentation, enhance patient convenience and ultimately increase vaccine uptake among high-risk Dutch adult populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":43021,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine: X","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 100713"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145118944","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Factors associated with COVID-19 non-vaccination among children and adolescents with chronic health conditions in Canada: A national cross-sectional study 加拿大慢性疾病儿童和青少年中与COVID-19未接种疫苗相关的因素:一项全国性横断面研究
IF 2.2 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100753
Arlanna Pugh, Sailly Dave, Marwa Ebrahim, Julie A. Laroche

Background

COVID-19 vaccine rollout has prioritized high risk populations, including children with chronic health conditions (CHC), who are at greater risk of severe illness and hospitalization if infected. This study aims to identify the sociodemographic factors associated with COVID-19 non-vaccination among Canadian children with at least one CHC, and parental reasons for non-vaccination.

Methods

The Childhood COVID-19 Immunization Coverage Survey is a nationally representative, cross-sectional survey of parents with children younger than 18 years old in Canada. Data was collected from April to July 2022 on COVID-19 immunization coverage and parental intentions to vaccinate their children. This study featured parents with children ages 5 to 17 years old who had at least one CHC. Unadjusted and adjusted weighted logistic regression models were built to explore factors of non-vaccination within this cohort.

Results

Of the 882 parents with children who have at least one CHC, 138 (16 %) reported that their child was unvaccinated against COVID-19. Children who were a visible minority (aOR: 2.66, 99 % CI: 2.48, 2.85) or who did not have asthma (aOR: 1.48, 99 % CI: 1.42–1.56) had greater odds of being unvaccinated, whereas adolescents 12–17 years old had lower odds (aOR: 0.10, 99 % CI: 0.09–0.11). Unvaccinated parents who were hesitant or refused to vaccinate their child cited vaccine safety (67.2 %), inadequate research on COVID-19 vaccines (57.7 %), and vaccine effectiveness (55.9 %) as their top 3 concerns on COVID-19 vaccination.

Conclusions

Study findings may help inform policies and programs designed to address parental vaccine hesitancy and increase vaccination uptake especially among children of visible minority, low SES and/or children who do not have asthma, but have other CHCs.
背景:covid -19疫苗的推广优先考虑了高风险人群,包括患有慢性疾病的儿童,这些儿童如果受到感染,患严重疾病和住院的风险更大。本研究旨在确定至少有一种CHC的加拿大儿童中与COVID-19未接种疫苗相关的社会人口学因素,以及父母未接种疫苗的原因。方法儿童COVID-19免疫覆盖调查是一项具有全国代表性的横断面调查,调查对象是加拿大18岁以下儿童的父母。从2022年4月至7月收集了关于COVID-19免疫覆盖率和父母为子女接种疫苗意愿的数据。这项研究的特点是父母的孩子年龄在5到17岁,至少有一个CHC。建立未调整和调整的加权logistic回归模型来探讨该队列中未接种疫苗的因素。结果在882名孩子至少有一种CHC的父母中,138名(16%)报告他们的孩子未接种COVID-19疫苗。少数族裔儿童(aOR: 2.66, 99% CI: 2.48, 2.85)或无哮喘儿童(aOR: 1.48, 99% CI: 1.42-1.56)未接种疫苗的几率较大,而12-17岁青少年未接种疫苗的几率较低(aOR: 0.10, 99% CI: 0.09-0.11)。未接种疫苗的犹豫或拒绝接种疫苗的父母认为疫苗安全性(67.2%)、新冠疫苗研究不足(57.7%)和疫苗有效性(55.9%)是他们对新冠疫苗接种的前三大担忧。结论:研究结果可能有助于制定政策和规划,解决父母疫苗犹豫问题,提高疫苗接种率,特别是在少数族裔儿童、低社会经济地位儿童和/或没有哮喘但有其他CHCs的儿童中。
{"title":"Factors associated with COVID-19 non-vaccination among children and adolescents with chronic health conditions in Canada: A national cross-sectional study","authors":"Arlanna Pugh,&nbsp;Sailly Dave,&nbsp;Marwa Ebrahim,&nbsp;Julie A. Laroche","doi":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100753","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100753","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>COVID-19 vaccine rollout has prioritized high risk populations, including children with chronic health conditions (CHC), who are at greater risk of severe illness and hospitalization if infected. This study aims to identify the sociodemographic factors associated with COVID-19 non-vaccination among Canadian children with at least one CHC, and parental reasons for non-vaccination.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The Childhood COVID-19 Immunization Coverage Survey is a nationally representative, cross-sectional survey of parents with children younger than 18 years old in Canada. Data was collected from April to July 2022 on COVID-19 immunization coverage and parental intentions to vaccinate their children. This study featured parents with children ages 5 to 17 years old who had at least one CHC. Unadjusted and adjusted weighted logistic regression models were built to explore factors of non-vaccination within this cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 882 parents with children who have at least one CHC, 138 (16 %) reported that their child was unvaccinated against COVID-19. Children who were a visible minority (aOR: 2.66, 99 % CI: 2.48, 2.85) or who did not have asthma (aOR: 1.48, 99 % CI: 1.42–1.56) had greater odds of being unvaccinated, whereas adolescents 12–17 years old had lower odds (aOR: 0.10, 99 % CI: 0.09–0.11). Unvaccinated parents who were hesitant or refused to vaccinate their child cited vaccine safety (67.2 %), inadequate research on COVID-19 vaccines (57.7 %), and vaccine effectiveness (55.9 %) as their top 3 concerns on COVID-19 vaccination.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Study findings may help inform policies and programs designed to address parental vaccine hesitancy and increase vaccination uptake especially among children of visible minority, low SES and/or children who do not have asthma, but have other CHCs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":43021,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine: X","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 100753"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145623631","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Vaccine: X
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1