Pub Date : 2024-03-19DOI: 10.24275/uam/izt/dcsh/polis/2023v19n1/checa
Martín Manuel Checa Arsatu
{"title":"No es normal. El juego oculto que alimenta la desigualdad mexicana y como cambiarlo","authors":"Martín Manuel Checa Arsatu","doi":"10.24275/uam/izt/dcsh/polis/2023v19n1/checa","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24275/uam/izt/dcsh/polis/2023v19n1/checa","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43237,"journal":{"name":"POLIS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140389704","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-19DOI: 10.24275/uam/izt/dcsh/polis/2023v19n1/franco
Erika Natalia Franco Hernández, Carla Beatriz Zamora Lomelí, Mateo Mier y Terán Giménez Cacho, Helda Morales, Julián Pérez Cassarino
{"title":"Agroecological markets: strategic processes of construction of Food Sovereignty. Case study in Colombia","authors":"Erika Natalia Franco Hernández, Carla Beatriz Zamora Lomelí, Mateo Mier y Terán Giménez Cacho, Helda Morales, Julián Pérez Cassarino","doi":"10.24275/uam/izt/dcsh/polis/2023v19n1/franco","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24275/uam/izt/dcsh/polis/2023v19n1/franco","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43237,"journal":{"name":"POLIS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140389591","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-19DOI: 10.24275/uam/izt/dcsh/polis/2023v19n1/perez
Anthony Pérez B alcázar, Antonio Aguilera Ontiveros
{"title":"Configuration of Sustainable Competitiveness. Qualitative analysis compared to fuzzy sets.","authors":"Anthony Pérez B alcázar, Antonio Aguilera Ontiveros","doi":"10.24275/uam/izt/dcsh/polis/2023v19n1/perez","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24275/uam/izt/dcsh/polis/2023v19n1/perez","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43237,"journal":{"name":"POLIS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140389918","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-03DOI: 10.1163/20512996-12340429
Andrew Meadows
This article examines the disconnect between, on the one hand, the insistence on the part of multiple characters in Thucydides’ first book on the need for the Peloponnesians to invest in naval power to defeat Athens, and, on the other, the failure to act on this in the narrative of books 2–7. It then analyses the numismatic evidence for the way in which Sparta does then act upon this advice in the course of the Ionian War, and suggests that Thucydides’ view that this was done primarily with Persian support may be missing a (brief) Spartan attempt to create a fiscally self-supporting empire.
{"title":"Origins and Ends: Money and Power in and beyond Thucydides’ Peloponnesian War","authors":"Andrew Meadows","doi":"10.1163/20512996-12340429","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/20512996-12340429","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article examines the disconnect between, on the one hand, the insistence on the part of multiple characters in Thucydides’ first book on the need for the Peloponnesians to invest in naval power to defeat Athens, and, on the other, the failure to act on this in the narrative of books 2–7. It then analyses the numismatic evidence for the way in which Sparta does then act upon this advice in the course of the Ionian War, and suggests that Thucydides’ view that this was done primarily with Persian support may be missing a (brief) Spartan attempt to create a fiscally self-supporting empire.</p>","PeriodicalId":43237,"journal":{"name":"POLIS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139376149","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-03DOI: 10.1163/20512996-12340430
David Lewis
This article discusses G.E.M. de Ste. Croix’s contentions about the effect of Helotage on Spartan foreign policy articulated in chapter IV of Origins of the Peloponnesian War, namely that Sparta’s Helot population was uniquely dangerous, constraining Sparta’s ability to send large numbers of citizen hoplites abroad lest it be exposed to the threat within. It shows that while certain arguments advanced by Ste. Croix are no longer tenable in light of subsequent research, others still stand up to critical scrutiny fifty years on; furthermore, other points neglected by Ste. Croix reinforce his overall claims.
本文讨论了 G.E.M. de Ste. Croix 在《伯罗奔尼撒战争的起源》一书第四章中阐述的关于赫洛特人对斯巴达外交政策的影响的论点,即斯巴达的赫洛特人具有独特的危险性,限制了斯巴达向国外派遣大量公民霍普利特人的能力,以免暴露在国内的威胁之下。这表明,尽管根据后来的研究,斯蒂-克鲁瓦提出的某些论点已不再站得住脚,但其他论点在五十年后的今天仍然经得起批判性的审视;此外,斯蒂-克鲁瓦忽略的其他观点也加强了他的总体主张。
{"title":"Fafner and the Rhinemaidens’ Treasure, Fifty Years On","authors":"David Lewis","doi":"10.1163/20512996-12340430","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/20512996-12340430","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article discusses G.E.M. de Ste. Croix’s contentions about the effect of Helotage on Spartan foreign policy articulated in chapter <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">IV</span> of <em>Origins of the Peloponnesian War</em>, namely that Sparta’s Helot population was uniquely dangerous, constraining Sparta’s ability to send large numbers of citizen hoplites abroad lest it be exposed to the threat within. It shows that while certain arguments advanced by Ste. Croix are no longer tenable in light of subsequent research, others still stand up to critical scrutiny fifty years on; furthermore, other points neglected by Ste. Croix reinforce his overall claims.</p>","PeriodicalId":43237,"journal":{"name":"POLIS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139376175","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-03DOI: 10.1163/20512996-12340432
Mirko Canevaro, David Lewis
This article discusses the fortune of Geoffrey de Ste. Croix’s famous article ‘The Character of the Athenian Empire’, and reassesses its basic thesis that the Athenian Empire was popular among the lower classes of the allied cities in the light of recent developments in the field. After surveying the article’s immediate and more recent reception, and discussing its relation with The Origins of the Peloponnesian War and The Class Struggle in the Ancient Greek World, it isolates four key new trends in Greek history that, while going against some of Ste. Croix’s basic convictions, end up reinforcing his overall case. These are: a renewed attention to the mass and elite dichotomy, with recent work interpreting Greek oligarchy as a fundamentally reactive and anti-demotic regime; the recognition of the continued relevance of Persian meddling in the later fifth-century; a sea-change in Attic epigraphy which has led to the post-dating of several ‘imperial’ decrees; the new recognition of the dynamism of the Greek economy, and of the economic function of the Athenian Empire itself. Finally, the article addresses the paradigm of class struggle and stresses how democracy and economic dynamism, to which the Athenian Empire contributed, fostered the growth of slave markets and worsened the exploitation of ‘marginal’ regions as slave suppliers.
{"title":"Between ‘The Character of the Athenian Empire’ and The Origins of the Peloponnesian War (and beyond): The Popularity of the Athenian Empire Revisited","authors":"Mirko Canevaro, David Lewis","doi":"10.1163/20512996-12340432","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/20512996-12340432","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article discusses the fortune of Geoffrey de Ste. Croix’s famous article ‘The Character of the Athenian Empire’, and reassesses its basic thesis that the Athenian Empire was popular among the lower classes of the allied cities in the light of recent developments in the field. After surveying the article’s immediate and more recent reception, and discussing its relation with <em>The Origins of the Peloponnesian War</em> and <em>The Class Struggle in the Ancient Greek World</em>, it isolates four key new trends in Greek history that, while going against some of Ste. Croix’s basic convictions, end up reinforcing his overall case. These are: a renewed attention to the mass and elite dichotomy, with recent work interpreting Greek oligarchy as a fundamentally reactive and anti-demotic regime; the recognition of the continued relevance of Persian meddling in the later fifth-century; a sea-change in Attic epigraphy which has led to the post-dating of several ‘imperial’ decrees; the new recognition of the dynamism of the Greek economy, and of the economic function of the Athenian Empire itself. Finally, the article addresses the paradigm of class struggle and stresses how democracy and economic dynamism, to which the Athenian Empire contributed, fostered the growth of slave markets and worsened the exploitation of ‘marginal’ regions as slave suppliers.</p>","PeriodicalId":43237,"journal":{"name":"POLIS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139376176","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-03DOI: 10.1163/20512996-12340425
Nino Luraghi
This short preface is meant to explain the purpose of the present volume and point to the diverse approaches and lines of argument pursued by the contributors.
这篇简短的序言旨在解释本卷的目的,并指出撰稿人所采用的不同方法和论证思路。
{"title":"50 Years after OPW: History and Historiography","authors":"Nino Luraghi","doi":"10.1163/20512996-12340425","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/20512996-12340425","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This short preface is meant to explain the purpose of the present volume and point to the diverse approaches and lines of argument pursued by the contributors.</p>","PeriodicalId":43237,"journal":{"name":"POLIS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139376146","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-03DOI: 10.1163/20512996-12340426
Robin Lane Fox
This survey, by a pupil of Geoffrey de Ste. Croix and eventual successor in his Oxford job, combines personal recollections of de Ste. Croix’s horizons and intellectual range with a penetrating study of his Origins of the Peloponnesian War, its underlying debts and detailed contentions. It addresses his, and Thucydides’, engagement with origins and causes, his central contention about votes by the Spartans and their allies on whether to go to war, the roles of Corinth, Megara and the much-discussed Megarian decree. It also presents a close reading of an Athenian involvement in Macedon and the north and its relevance to de Ste. Croix’s views on Athenian imperialism. It then sets the book’s conclusions in a wider context, ranging from modern writings on the origins of war to its concluding echo of Lenin.
这本研究报告由杰弗里-德-斯蒂-克鲁瓦的学生和他在牛津大学工作的最终继任者撰写,将对德-斯蒂-克鲁瓦的视野和知识范围的个人回忆与对《伯罗奔尼撒战争起源》、其基本债务和详细论点的深入研究相结合。该书论述了他和修昔底德对战争起源和起因的看法、他关于斯巴达人及其盟友是否参战的投票的核心论点、科林斯、梅加拉的作用以及备受讨论的梅加里亚法令。本书还对雅典在马其顿和北方的参与及其与 de Ste.然后,它将该书的结论置于更广泛的背景中,从有关战争起源的现代著作到该书最后对列宁的呼应。
{"title":"OPW and de Ste. Croix: the Past and Present Views of a Pupil","authors":"Robin Lane Fox","doi":"10.1163/20512996-12340426","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/20512996-12340426","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This survey, by a pupil of Geoffrey de Ste. Croix and eventual successor in his Oxford job, combines personal recollections of de Ste. Croix’s horizons and intellectual range with a penetrating study of his <em>Origins of the Peloponnesian War</em>, its underlying debts and detailed contentions. It addresses his, and Thucydides’, engagement with origins and causes, his central contention about votes by the Spartans and their allies on whether to go to war, the roles of Corinth, Megara and the much-discussed Megarian decree. It also presents a close reading of an Athenian involvement in Macedon and the north and its relevance to de Ste. Croix’s views on Athenian imperialism. It then sets the book’s conclusions in a wider context, ranging from modern writings on the origins of war to its concluding echo of Lenin.</p>","PeriodicalId":43237,"journal":{"name":"POLIS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139375940","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-03DOI: 10.1163/20512996-12340431
Stephen Hodkinson
This article examines the impact on Spartan historiography of Chapter IV of de Ste. Croix’s Origins of the Peloponnesian War, focusing on his discussions of Spartan politics and society in Sections v–vi. These sections fit oddly within the overall chapter, but they blew a breath of fresh air into Spartan studies through their revisionist approach, intimations of the socio-economic bases of policy-making, and extended accounts of ‘real-life’ political episodes across the classical period. Along with Moses Finley’s near-contemporary article on Sparta, OPW significantly influenced the following generation of British historians (including the author), although they often adopted different interpretations or developed new perspectives on Spartan society only hinted at by de Ste. Croix. OPW also had an important impact on Western European historiography on Spartan politics. Its combination of constitutional and societal approaches gives it an enduring currency in the context of developing Historical Institutionalist approaches to political studies.
本文探讨了 de Ste. Croix 的《伯罗奔尼撒战争的起源》第四章对斯巴达史学的影响,重点关注他在第五至第六节中对斯巴达政治和社会的讨论。这几节在全章中的位置很奇怪,但它们通过修正主义的方法、对决策的社会经济基础的暗示以及对整个古典时期 "真实 "政治事件的扩展叙述,为斯巴达研究吹进了一股新鲜空气。与摩西-芬利(Moses Finley)几乎同时发表的关于斯巴达的文章一起,《斯巴达历史研究》对下一代英国历史学家(包括作者)产生了重大影响,尽管他们经常采用不同的解释,或对斯巴达社会提出新的观点,而这些观点只有 de Ste.OPW 对西欧有关斯巴达政治的史学研究也产生了重要影响。它结合了宪法和社会的研究方法,使其在发展历史制度主义政治研究方法的背景下经久不衰。
{"title":"The Origins of the Peloponnesian War, Chapter IV, and the Development of Spartan Historical Studies","authors":"Stephen Hodkinson","doi":"10.1163/20512996-12340431","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/20512996-12340431","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article examines the impact on Spartan historiography of Chapter <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">IV</span> of de Ste. Croix’s <em>Origins of the Peloponnesian War</em>, focusing on his discussions of Spartan politics and society in Sections v–vi. These sections fit oddly within the overall chapter, but they blew a breath of fresh air into Spartan studies through their revisionist approach, intimations of the socio-economic bases of policy-making, and extended accounts of ‘real-life’ political episodes across the classical period. Along with Moses Finley’s near-contemporary article on Sparta, <em><span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">OPW</span></em> significantly influenced the following generation of British historians (including the author), although they often adopted different interpretations or developed new perspectives on Spartan society only hinted at by de Ste. Croix. <em><span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">OPW</span></em> also had an important impact on Western European historiography on Spartan politics. Its combination of constitutional and societal approaches gives it an enduring currency in the context of developing Historical Institutionalist approaches to political studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":43237,"journal":{"name":"POLIS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139376104","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-03DOI: 10.1163/20512996-12340427
Leah Lazar
In this article, jumping off from Geoffrey de Ste. Croix’s treatment of Aristophanes and the Megarian Decree, I argue that Old Comedy is an underutilised category of evidence for the study of the popular intellectual history of Athens. My particular focus here is the Athenian empire: how does Old Comedy present Athenian power and what does this comic presentation tell us about how at least some ordinary Athenians understood it? Can one popular Athenian imaginary of the empire be constructed through analysis of Aristophanes and his contemporaries? I will argue that Old Comedy, taken as a corpus, presents a very Athenian empire, that is to say one focused on Athens and its exploitation of others. The comic poets, therefore, likely assumed parochialism and myopia on the part of their audience, but also significant topical interest in the mechanisms of Athenian power, particularly those which brought revenue to Athens. This impression of highly topical engagement with the empire is corroborated by bringing Comedy into dialogue with other sources, in particular the epigraphic record.
在这篇文章中,我从杰弗里-德-斯蒂-克鲁瓦(Geoffrey de Ste. Croix)对阿里斯托芬(Aristophanes)和《梅加里安法令》(Megarian Decree)的论述出发,认为《旧喜剧》是研究雅典大众思想史的一类未被充分利用的证据。我在此特别关注雅典帝国:《旧喜剧》是如何展现雅典权力的,这种喜剧表现形式告诉我们至少一些普通雅典人是如何理解雅典权力的?通过对阿里斯托芬及其同时代人的分析,能否构建出一种雅典人对帝国的通俗想象?我将论证,《旧喜剧》作为一部文集,展现的是一个非常雅典化的帝国,也就是说,一个以雅典及其对他国的剥削为中心的帝国。因此,喜剧诗人很可能假定他们的受众是狭隘和近视的,但同时也对雅典的权力机制,尤其是那些为雅典带来收入的机制有着浓厚的兴趣。通过将《喜剧》与其他资料,特别是书信记录进行对话,可以证实这种对帝国高度关注的印象。
{"title":"Old Comedy and Athenian Power","authors":"Leah Lazar","doi":"10.1163/20512996-12340427","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/20512996-12340427","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this article, jumping off from Geoffrey de Ste. Croix’s treatment of Aristophanes and the Megarian Decree, I argue that Old Comedy is an underutilised category of evidence for the study of the popular intellectual history of Athens. My particular focus here is the Athenian empire: how does Old Comedy present Athenian power and what does this comic presentation tell us about how at least some ordinary Athenians understood it? Can one popular Athenian imaginary of the empire be constructed through analysis of Aristophanes and his contemporaries? I will argue that Old Comedy, taken as a corpus, presents a very Athenian empire, that is to say one focused on Athens and its exploitation of others. The comic poets, therefore, likely assumed parochialism and myopia on the part of their audience, but also significant topical interest in the mechanisms of Athenian power, particularly those which brought revenue to Athens. This impression of highly topical engagement with the empire is corroborated by bringing Comedy into dialogue with other sources, in particular the epigraphic record.</p>","PeriodicalId":43237,"journal":{"name":"POLIS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139376183","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}