Pub Date : 2023-11-12DOI: 10.1080/00393274.2023.2261499
Zilong Zhong
{"title":"Matylda Włodarczyk, Jukka Tyrkkö & Elżbieta Adamczyk (eds.). <i>Multilingualism from manuscript to 3D: Intersections of modalities from medieval to modern times.</i> New York: Routledge. 2023. ISBN 9781003166634. 274 pp.","authors":"Zilong Zhong","doi":"10.1080/00393274.2023.2261499","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00393274.2023.2261499","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43263,"journal":{"name":"STUDIA NEOPHILOLOGICA","volume":"80 16","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135037228","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-03DOI: 10.1080/00393274.2023.2253290
Yabo Yan, Yong Mei
Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Disclosure statementThe authors declare that they have no potential conflict of interest.Additional informationFundingThis work is supported by the Fund for the Humanities and Social Sciences sponsored by the Department of Education of Hubei Province (Grant No. 22Y002), the Provincial Teaching Reform Research Project in Hubei Province (Grant No. 2020319), and the Wuhan Educational Science Planning Project (Grant No. 2022ZG21).
{"title":"Jakub Przybył & Mirosław Pawlak. <i>Personality as a factor affecting the use of language learning strategies: The case of university students</i> . Cham: Springer Nature. 2023. ISBN 978-3-031-25254-9, (hardcover), ISBN 978-3-031-25257-0 (softcover) ISBN 978-3-031-25255-6 (ebook). xi + 210 pp.","authors":"Yabo Yan, Yong Mei","doi":"10.1080/00393274.2023.2253290","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00393274.2023.2253290","url":null,"abstract":"Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Disclosure statementThe authors declare that they have no potential conflict of interest.Additional informationFundingThis work is supported by the Fund for the Humanities and Social Sciences sponsored by the Department of Education of Hubei Province (Grant No. 22Y002), the Provincial Teaching Reform Research Project in Hubei Province (Grant No. 2020319), and the Wuhan Educational Science Planning Project (Grant No. 2022ZG21).","PeriodicalId":43263,"journal":{"name":"STUDIA NEOPHILOLOGICA","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135819144","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-31DOI: 10.1080/00393274.2023.2228831
Irina Rabinovich
{"title":"The feebleminded and unfit should not have babies – American eugenics in K.D. Alden’s <i>A Mother’s Promise</i>","authors":"Irina Rabinovich","doi":"10.1080/00393274.2023.2228831","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00393274.2023.2228831","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43263,"journal":{"name":"STUDIA NEOPHILOLOGICA","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135872654","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-29DOI: 10.1080/00393274.2023.2251561
Paul Battles
{"title":"<i>Andreas</i> and the Cynewulfian poetic sociolect","authors":"Paul Battles","doi":"10.1080/00393274.2023.2251561","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00393274.2023.2251561","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43263,"journal":{"name":"STUDIA NEOPHILOLOGICA","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136157685","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-26DOI: 10.1080/00393274.2023.2265985
Sirkku Ruokkeinen, Aino Liira, Mari-Liisa Varila, Otso Norblad, Matti Peikola
This article examines visual modes of information transmission in early modern English books. Images, tables, diagrams, and other graphic devices may be used to support or illustrate the text and to communicate information difficult or even impossible to convey via words alone. Previously established models of graphic representation generally focus either on individual devices or device types, or aim to construct taxonomies of present-day materials; little has been done to combine these approaches to create historical taxonomies of visual communication. This article presents a model for classifying graphic devices in early English print, 1473-1700, based on a cross-disciplinary review of previous scholarly work on graphic and visual devices, and discusses the methodology of constructing a taxonomy of devices suitable for historical, diachronic research.
{"title":"Developing a classification model for graphic devices in early printed books","authors":"Sirkku Ruokkeinen, Aino Liira, Mari-Liisa Varila, Otso Norblad, Matti Peikola","doi":"10.1080/00393274.2023.2265985","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00393274.2023.2265985","url":null,"abstract":"This article examines visual modes of information transmission in early modern English books. Images, tables, diagrams, and other graphic devices may be used to support or illustrate the text and to communicate information difficult or even impossible to convey via words alone. Previously established models of graphic representation generally focus either on individual devices or device types, or aim to construct taxonomies of present-day materials; little has been done to combine these approaches to create historical taxonomies of visual communication. This article presents a model for classifying graphic devices in early English print, 1473-1700, based on a cross-disciplinary review of previous scholarly work on graphic and visual devices, and discusses the methodology of constructing a taxonomy of devices suitable for historical, diachronic research.","PeriodicalId":43263,"journal":{"name":"STUDIA NEOPHILOLOGICA","volume":"31 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136381474","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-15DOI: 10.1080/00393274.2023.2256365
Anna Rutka
ABSTRACTThis article analyses Lena Gorelik’s latest novel Wer wir sind (2021) in terms of cultural debates on postmigration diversity and multilin-gualism in modern Germany in recent years. The novel Wer wir sind can be read as a process of dealing with the family experience of migration, shown across generations, as well as the difficult process of learning German and settling into a culturally different context. The analysis of the novel focuses on linguistic and narratological means through which the opposition to the national concepts of monolingualism and the identity of migrants as ‘others’ is expressed. The process of learning German, the role of the German-speaking writer and multilingual identity are presented in the novel as strategies of opposition to the hegemonic national discourse. On the one hand, learning German and writing literary works in this language appear to be subversive activities in relation to oppressive cultural and social norms and acts of self-empowerment. On the other hand, literary images of linguis-tic resistance and self-determination are marked by an awareness of linguistic unattainability and uncertainty. ‘Mastering’ a language, as well as writing literature, is an ambivalent process and work in progress.KEYWORDS: Russian-Jewish-German proseLena Gorelikpost-migrationempowerment Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Den Begriff Dominanzkultur prägte Birgit Rommelspacher. Sie bezeichnet damit die Mehrheitsgesellschaft, d.h. den Teil einer Gesellschaft, der wegen seines größeren Anteils an der Gesamtbevölkerung die kulturelle, politische und gesellschaftliche Definitionsmacht für sich beansprucht (Rommelspacher Citation1995).2 Die Tendenz der selbstbewussten Performanz von Unterschieden, die in ,,einer Gesellschaft der Vielen“ zur ,,Grundlage des Zusammenlebens“ (Czollek Citation2017, 121) erklärt wird sowie die ,,Selbstermächtigung“ als Widerstand gegen eine Vereinnahmung durch die Mehrheitskultur stehen im Fokus der seit 2017 in Berlin erscheinenden Zeitschrift Jalta. Positionen zur jüdischen Gegenwart. Die erste Ausgabe der Zeitschrift trug den programmatischen Titel Selbstermächtigung (2017).3 Zur Kritik des Othering-Prozesses dem zufolge die Menschen und ihre Lebensgeschichten als Gegenbilder zu einer national/ethnisch abgegrenzten Mehrheitsgesellschaft verhandelt werden, vgl. den Aufsatz von Marina Chernivsky ,,Empowerment und Selbstermächtigung“ (Chernivsky Citation2017: bes. 54).4 An dieser Stelle sei kurz auf das prominente Beispiel von Katja Petrowskaja eingegangen: Petrowskaja gewann 2013 mit dem Ausschnitt aus ihrem Buch Vielleicht Esther (veröffentlicht 2014) den Ingeborg-Bachmann-Preis. Seitdem wurde der Prosatext in einer schier unübersehbaren Flut von internationalen literaturwissenschaftlichen Beiträgen u.a. im Hinblick auf die sprachlichen Übergänge und die Rolle der Mehrsprachigkeit diskutiert. Drei Jahre nach Petrowskajas Klagenfurter Erfolg
摘要本文从近年来现代德国关于移民后多样性和多语言主义的文化争论出发，分析了莱娜·戈雷利克的新作《我们在一起》(2021)。小说《我们在一起》可以被解读为一个处理跨代移民家庭经历的过程，以及学习德语和融入不同文化背景的艰难过程。对小说的分析主要集中在语言和叙事手段上，通过这些手段，对单一语言主义的国家概念和移民作为“他者”的身份的反对得以表达。学习德语的过程、讲德语的作家的角色和多语言身份在小说中被呈现为反对霸权民族话语的策略。一方面，学习德语和用这种语言写作文学作品似乎是与压迫性的文化和社会规范以及自我赋权行为有关的颠覆活动。另一方面，语言抵抗和自我决定的文学形象以语言的不可达性和不确定性为特征。“掌握”一门语言，以及写作文学，是一个矛盾的过程和工作的进展。关键词:俄-犹太-德裔律师selena Gorelikpost-migrationempowerment披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。注1 Den Begriff dominanzkulr prägte Birgit Rommelspacher。[2]〔1〕〔1〕〔1〕〔1〕〔1〕〔1〕〔1〕〔1〕〔1〕〔1〕〔1〕〔1〕〔1〕〔1〕〔1〕〔1〕〔1〕〔1〕〔1〕〔1〕“未来发展趋势”，“未来发展趋势”，“未来发展趋势”，“未来发展趋势”，“未来发展趋势”，“未来发展趋势”，“未来发展趋势”，“未来发展趋势”，“未来发展趋势”，“未来发展趋势”，“未来发展趋势”，“未来发展趋势”，“未来发展趋势”，“未来发展趋势”，“未来发展趋势”，“未来发展趋势”，“未来发展趋势”，“未来发展趋势”，“未来发展趋势”，“未来发展趋势”position zur j<s:1> dischen gengenwart。2 .《科学与技术》(2017). Selbstermächtigung《其他方面的批判与进步》和《其他方面的批判与进步》，《其他方面的批判与进步》和《其他方面的批判与进步》，《其他方面的批判与进步》，《其他方面的批判与进步》。切尔尼夫斯基，“赋权与Selbstermächtigung”(Chernivsky Citation2017: bes)。54) 4。与此同时，研究人员还发现了一些新的问题，如:peter Petrowskaja gewann 2013; demdem Ausschnitt aus ihrem Buch Vielleicht Esther (veröffentlicht 2014) den ingeburg - bachmann - preis。在德国文学研究中，德国文学研究在国际文学研究中起着重要的作用Beiträgen与德国文学研究在德国文学研究中起着重要的作用Übergänge。2016年9月，在克拉根福尔，德国文学评论家和德国文学评论家在德国文学评论家和德国文学评论家在德国文学评论家和德国文学评论家在德国文学评论家和德国文学评论家在德国文学评论家和德国文学评论家在德国文学评论家。译:在德语中，语序为德语，语序为德语，语序为德语，语序为德语，语序为德语，语序为德语。《罗马人的出版》《罗马人的文学》《罗马人的文学》《罗马人的文学》《罗马人的文学》《罗马人的文学》《罗马人的文学》《罗马人的文学》《罗马人的文学》《罗马人的文学》《罗马人的文学》《罗马人的文学》《罗马人的文学》《罗马人的文学》《罗马人的文学》《罗马人的文学》《罗马人》《罗马人的文学》《罗马人》《罗马人的文学》《罗马人》《罗马人的文学》《罗马人》《罗马人》《罗马人》《罗马人》《罗马人》《罗马人》《罗马人》《罗马人》《罗马人》《罗马人》《罗马人》《阐释》《罗马人》德国巴赫曼文学研究中心:德国巴赫曼文学研究中心5 Max Czollek和andere Aktivist在柏林的Umfeld des Gorki剧院，entwickelten as Projekt der Desintegration, mitdem es eine grundlegende Revision des herkömmlichen Integrationsdenkens fordern。6 .“德国，意识形态-文化”，“德国，意识形态-文化”，“德国，意识形态-文化”，“德国，意识形态-文化”，“德国，意识形态-文化”，“德国，意识形态-文化”，“德国，意识形态-文化”，“德国，意识形态-文化”，“德国，意识形态-文化”，“德国，意识形态-文化”，“德国，意识形态-文化”，“德国，意识形态-文化”[2] [j] .中国当代文学研究进展与发展[j] .中国当代文学研究。
{"title":"Widerständige Sprachpraxis und literarische Selbstermächtigung: Postmigrantische Perspektiven auf Ein- und Mehrsprachigkeit in Lena Goreliks Roman <i>Wer wir sind</i> (2021)","authors":"Anna Rutka","doi":"10.1080/00393274.2023.2256365","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00393274.2023.2256365","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis article analyses Lena Gorelik’s latest novel Wer wir sind (2021) in terms of cultural debates on postmigration diversity and multilin-gualism in modern Germany in recent years. The novel Wer wir sind can be read as a process of dealing with the family experience of migration, shown across generations, as well as the difficult process of learning German and settling into a culturally different context. The analysis of the novel focuses on linguistic and narratological means through which the opposition to the national concepts of monolingualism and the identity of migrants as ‘others’ is expressed. The process of learning German, the role of the German-speaking writer and multilingual identity are presented in the novel as strategies of opposition to the hegemonic national discourse. On the one hand, learning German and writing literary works in this language appear to be subversive activities in relation to oppressive cultural and social norms and acts of self-empowerment. On the other hand, literary images of linguis-tic resistance and self-determination are marked by an awareness of linguistic unattainability and uncertainty. ‘Mastering’ a language, as well as writing literature, is an ambivalent process and work in progress.KEYWORDS: Russian-Jewish-German proseLena Gorelikpost-migrationempowerment Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Den Begriff Dominanzkultur prägte Birgit Rommelspacher. Sie bezeichnet damit die Mehrheitsgesellschaft, d.h. den Teil einer Gesellschaft, der wegen seines größeren Anteils an der Gesamtbevölkerung die kulturelle, politische und gesellschaftliche Definitionsmacht für sich beansprucht (Rommelspacher Citation1995).2 Die Tendenz der selbstbewussten Performanz von Unterschieden, die in ,,einer Gesellschaft der Vielen“ zur ,,Grundlage des Zusammenlebens“ (Czollek Citation2017, 121) erklärt wird sowie die ,,Selbstermächtigung“ als Widerstand gegen eine Vereinnahmung durch die Mehrheitskultur stehen im Fokus der seit 2017 in Berlin erscheinenden Zeitschrift Jalta. Positionen zur jüdischen Gegenwart. Die erste Ausgabe der Zeitschrift trug den programmatischen Titel Selbstermächtigung (2017).3 Zur Kritik des Othering-Prozesses dem zufolge die Menschen und ihre Lebensgeschichten als Gegenbilder zu einer national/ethnisch abgegrenzten Mehrheitsgesellschaft verhandelt werden, vgl. den Aufsatz von Marina Chernivsky ,,Empowerment und Selbstermächtigung“ (Chernivsky Citation2017: bes. 54).4 An dieser Stelle sei kurz auf das prominente Beispiel von Katja Petrowskaja eingegangen: Petrowskaja gewann 2013 mit dem Ausschnitt aus ihrem Buch Vielleicht Esther (veröffentlicht 2014) den Ingeborg-Bachmann-Preis. Seitdem wurde der Prosatext in einer schier unübersehbaren Flut von internationalen literaturwissenschaftlichen Beiträgen u.a. im Hinblick auf die sprachlichen Übergänge und die Rolle der Mehrsprachigkeit diskutiert. Drei Jahre nach Petrowskajas Klagenfurter Erfolg ","PeriodicalId":43263,"journal":{"name":"STUDIA NEOPHILOLOGICA","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135759117","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-26DOI: 10.1080/00393274.2023.2253846
Na Xu
ABSTRACTThis article identifies and analyzes new evidence for the theory that The Dream of the Rood is a product of composite authorship. An examination of the attestations of the word hæleð in the corpus of Old English poetry reveals that vocative uses of this word are found only in The Order of the World, Judith, Andreas, Elene, and the second half of The Dream of the Rood. The restriction of the vocative use of hæleð to these works is shown to substantiate the theory of composite authorship for The Dream of the Rood and associate the poem’s second half with the Cynewulfian school of poetic composition.KEYWORDS: The Dream of the RoodhæleðauthorshipCynewulf AcknowledgmentsI thank Professor Leonard Neidorf, Zixuan Wei, Kexin Zhang, and Chenyun Zhu for reading this work in draft and assisting me with the composition of it.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Among several dozen stylistic inconsistencies, three are especially salient and deserve mentioning at the outset: the disappearance of hypermetric lines (Fleming Citation1966: 55), longer and difficult-to-divide sentences (Lee Citation1972: 470), and the absence of vivid imagery (Burrow Citation1959: 132) in the second half of the poem.2 This edition was originally published in 1934. Scholars prior to them, Albert S. Cook for instance, also perceived that the poem contained interpolations, see Cook Citation1905: xlii.3 See Burrow (Citation1959: 130); Burlin (Citation1968: 42); Patten (Citation1968: 385); Lee (Citation1972); and Swanton (Citation1996: 77).4 See, for instance, Orton (Citation2000: 160); and Neidorf (Citation2016).5 See Hieatt (Citation1971).6 Citations of Old English poems refer to the editions of Krapp and Dobbie (Citation1931–53), The Anglo-Saxon Poetic Records. Translations of The Dream of the Rood are cited throughout from Clayton (Citation2013).7 In this note, Neidorf points out that in the second half of the poem ‘there is a steep decline in the incidence of verses that begin with a finite verb’ (95) and thus proposes that ‘at least two authors with distinct compositional tendencies contributed to its transmitted text’ (96).8 For the comprehensive data for hæleð, see Appendix.9 The translation is cited from Bjork (Citation2014).10 The translation is cited from Hamer (Citation2015).11 All translations of Andreas are cited from Clayton (Citation2013).12 The translation is cited from Bjork (Citation2013).13 See Timmer (Citation1966); Cassidy and Ringer (Citation1974: 346); Griffith (Citation1997: 47); and Orchard (Citation2006).14 See Bjork (Citation2013: x–xviii).15 For the identification of this frame and the conventional use of it, see Louviot (Citation2016: 163; Citation2018: 283–284). I would like to thank the anonymous referee for calling my attention to this point and making my argument stronger.16 See Kemble (Citation1840: 362–3); Thorpe (Citation1842: 501); Dietrich (Citation1865); and Cook (Citation1905: xl). How
{"title":"Old English <i>hæleð</i> and the authorship of <i>The Dream of the Rood</i>","authors":"Na Xu","doi":"10.1080/00393274.2023.2253846","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00393274.2023.2253846","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis article identifies and analyzes new evidence for the theory that The Dream of the Rood is a product of composite authorship. An examination of the attestations of the word hæleð in the corpus of Old English poetry reveals that vocative uses of this word are found only in The Order of the World, Judith, Andreas, Elene, and the second half of The Dream of the Rood. The restriction of the vocative use of hæleð to these works is shown to substantiate the theory of composite authorship for The Dream of the Rood and associate the poem’s second half with the Cynewulfian school of poetic composition.KEYWORDS: The Dream of the RoodhæleðauthorshipCynewulf AcknowledgmentsI thank Professor Leonard Neidorf, Zixuan Wei, Kexin Zhang, and Chenyun Zhu for reading this work in draft and assisting me with the composition of it.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Among several dozen stylistic inconsistencies, three are especially salient and deserve mentioning at the outset: the disappearance of hypermetric lines (Fleming Citation1966: 55), longer and difficult-to-divide sentences (Lee Citation1972: 470), and the absence of vivid imagery (Burrow Citation1959: 132) in the second half of the poem.2 This edition was originally published in 1934. Scholars prior to them, Albert S. Cook for instance, also perceived that the poem contained interpolations, see Cook Citation1905: xlii.3 See Burrow (Citation1959: 130); Burlin (Citation1968: 42); Patten (Citation1968: 385); Lee (Citation1972); and Swanton (Citation1996: 77).4 See, for instance, Orton (Citation2000: 160); and Neidorf (Citation2016).5 See Hieatt (Citation1971).6 Citations of Old English poems refer to the editions of Krapp and Dobbie (Citation1931–53), The Anglo-Saxon Poetic Records. Translations of The Dream of the Rood are cited throughout from Clayton (Citation2013).7 In this note, Neidorf points out that in the second half of the poem ‘there is a steep decline in the incidence of verses that begin with a finite verb’ (95) and thus proposes that ‘at least two authors with distinct compositional tendencies contributed to its transmitted text’ (96).8 For the comprehensive data for hæleð, see Appendix.9 The translation is cited from Bjork (Citation2014).10 The translation is cited from Hamer (Citation2015).11 All translations of Andreas are cited from Clayton (Citation2013).12 The translation is cited from Bjork (Citation2013).13 See Timmer (Citation1966); Cassidy and Ringer (Citation1974: 346); Griffith (Citation1997: 47); and Orchard (Citation2006).14 See Bjork (Citation2013: x–xviii).15 For the identification of this frame and the conventional use of it, see Louviot (Citation2016: 163; Citation2018: 283–284). I would like to thank the anonymous referee for calling my attention to this point and making my argument stronger.16 See Kemble (Citation1840: 362–3); Thorpe (Citation1842: 501); Dietrich (Citation1865); and Cook (Citation1905: xl). How","PeriodicalId":43263,"journal":{"name":"STUDIA NEOPHILOLOGICA","volume":"2011 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134885566","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-07DOI: 10.1080/00393274.2023.2251550
Suzanne Penuel
{"title":"The presence of Rome in medieval and early modern Britain: Texts, artefacts and beliefs","authors":"Suzanne Penuel","doi":"10.1080/00393274.2023.2251550","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00393274.2023.2251550","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43263,"journal":{"name":"STUDIA NEOPHILOLOGICA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2023-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45540631","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-21DOI: 10.1080/00393274.2023.2224831
Ljubica Leone
{"title":"Multifunctionality of the discourse marker okay in spoken English: A sociolinguistic examination linked to age","authors":"Ljubica Leone","doi":"10.1080/00393274.2023.2224831","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00393274.2023.2224831","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43263,"journal":{"name":"STUDIA NEOPHILOLOGICA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44065465","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：