Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.21639/2313-6715.2021.1.5.
I. Minnikes, M.D. Esitashvili
The article discusses the trends in the development of legislation regulating the aviation business in the Russian Federation, in particular, theoretical and practical issues related to the efficiency and safety of air transportation, as well as the search for a balance between them. The article reveals the history of forming the concepts «transport security» and «aviation security» in the Soviet and modern Russian legislation. In order to clarify the Russian state authorities` powers distribution in the field of transport security and their consolidation in the current legislation, the authors investigate the features of the powers of these bodies in the historical retrospect from the beginning of the XIX century. The authors critically analyze the implementation of the certain provisions of the Government of the Russian Federation «On the approval of requirements for ensuring transport security, taking into account the safety levels for air transport vehicles», the implementation of which causes significant problems for air transport operators. It is established that the implementation of these provisions is difficult: it will significantly aggravate the existing economic situation of aircraft operators, and in combination with the general negative trends in the world can lead to a possible mass bankruptcy of domestic small and medium-sized airlines. The authors suggest ways to solve the identified problems. In particular, a possible solution in finding a balance between transport safety and the cost-effectiveness of air transportation may be a «transition period», during which the expansion of the requirements under study will affect only new aircraft.
{"title":"Legal Regulation of the Aviation Business in Russia: Finding a Balance between Ensuring Transport Security and Air Transportation Efficiency","authors":"I. Minnikes, M.D. Esitashvili","doi":"10.21639/2313-6715.2021.1.5.","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21639/2313-6715.2021.1.5.","url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses the trends in the development of legislation regulating the aviation business in the Russian Federation, in particular, theoretical and practical issues related to the efficiency and safety of air transportation, as well as the search for a balance between them. The article reveals the history of forming the concepts «transport security» and «aviation security» in the Soviet and modern Russian legislation. In order to clarify the Russian state authorities` powers distribution in the field of transport security and their consolidation in the current legislation, the authors investigate the features of the powers of these bodies in the historical retrospect from the beginning of the XIX century. The authors critically analyze the implementation of the certain provisions of the Government of the Russian Federation «On the approval of requirements for ensuring transport security, taking into account the safety levels for air transport vehicles», the implementation of which causes significant problems for air transport operators. It is established that the implementation of these provisions is difficult: it will significantly aggravate the existing economic situation of aircraft operators, and in combination with the general negative trends in the world can lead to a possible mass bankruptcy of domestic small and medium-sized airlines. The authors suggest ways to solve the identified problems. In particular, a possible solution in finding a balance between transport safety and the cost-effectiveness of air transportation may be a «transition period», during which the expansion of the requirements under study will affect only new aircraft.","PeriodicalId":433311,"journal":{"name":"Prologue: Law Journal","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115172293","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.21639/2313-6715.2021.4.2.
E. Aleksandrova
The introduction of the principle of unity of public authority has led to the development of a new federal law «On the general principles of the public authority organization in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation». In this regard, the author set the goal: to determine how the provisions of this law change the system and status of public authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. When considering these issues a wide range of methods was used, including the method of analysis, comparison, logical, deduction and generalization. As a result of the study the features of the state power system of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation were identified, the main of which, in our view, is the attribution of the highest official to the mandatory bodies of state power of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation; the consistency of existing models of state power organization of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation was outlined. In this case, due to a different legal technique and the allocation of provisions on the highest official in a separate chapter of the law, there is a certain confusion with the definition of his position in the system of public authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. The author supports the provisions of the law on the inclusion of the highest official of a constituent entity of the Russian Federation among the mandatory in the system of public authorities of a constituent entity of the Russian Federation, and justifies the need to include provisions on it in the chapter on executive power bodies.
{"title":"Organization of Public Power in the Constituent Entities of the Russian Federation: Reforming or Improving?","authors":"E. Aleksandrova","doi":"10.21639/2313-6715.2021.4.2.","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21639/2313-6715.2021.4.2.","url":null,"abstract":"The introduction of the principle of unity of public authority has led to the development of a new federal law «On the general principles of the public authority organization in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation». In this regard, the author set the goal: to determine how the provisions of this law change the system and status of public authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. When considering these issues a wide range of methods was used, including the method of analysis, comparison, logical, deduction and generalization. As a result of the study the features of the state power system of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation were identified, the main of which, in our view, is the attribution of the highest official to the mandatory bodies of state power of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation; the consistency of existing models of state power organization of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation was outlined. In this case, due to a different legal technique and the allocation of provisions on the highest official in a separate chapter of the law, there is a certain confusion with the definition of his position in the system of public authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. The author supports the provisions of the law on the inclusion of the highest official of a constituent entity of the Russian Federation among the mandatory in the system of public authorities of a constituent entity of the Russian Federation, and justifies the need to include provisions on it in the chapter on executive power bodies.","PeriodicalId":433311,"journal":{"name":"Prologue: Law Journal","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121317239","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.21639/2313-6715.2022.1.4.
U. Filatova
One of the actual directions of the modern legislation development in Russia remains legal provision of social sphere transition from state to private sector of economy. Along with the new legal phenomenon – social entrepreneurship – a number of other legal categories requiring theoretical understanding have appeared. This article analyzes the legal nature of the social certificate for public municipal services in the social sphere. According to the law, the social certificate is a registered document certifying the right of the consumer of services or his legal representative to choose a provider of social services in a certain volume and on certain conditions, as well as in the cases established by regulatory legal acts of a certain quality and the right of the provider of services to receive from the appropriate budget of the budgetary system of the Russian Federation funds for financial support (compensation) of costs associated with the provision of the relevant state (municipal) service. Due to the fact that the process of providing social services is regulated by both social and civil legislation, the study of the legal nature of the certificate for rendering services in the social sphere is carried out through the analysis of similar legal structures characteristic of both public (housing certificate, certificate for the right to receive maternity capital) and private law (securities, gift certificate). The author substantiates the conclusion that the certificate for the provision of state (municipal) services in the social sphere can be characterized as an obligation of option type with a number of features determined by the specifics of services that constitute the subject of this contract.
{"title":"Social Certificate for State (Municipal) Services in the Social Spheres: To the Question of the Legal Nature","authors":"U. Filatova","doi":"10.21639/2313-6715.2022.1.4.","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21639/2313-6715.2022.1.4.","url":null,"abstract":"One of the actual directions of the modern legislation development in Russia remains legal provision of social sphere transition from state to private sector of economy. Along with the new legal phenomenon – social entrepreneurship – a number of other legal categories requiring theoretical understanding have appeared. This article analyzes the legal nature of the social certificate for public municipal services in the social sphere. According to the law, the social certificate is a registered document certifying the right of the consumer of services or his legal representative to choose a provider of social services in a certain volume and on certain conditions, as well as in the cases established by regulatory legal acts of a certain quality and the right of the provider of services to receive from the appropriate budget of the budgetary system of the Russian Federation funds for financial support (compensation) of costs associated with the provision of the relevant state (municipal) service. Due to the fact that the process of providing social services is regulated by both social and civil legislation, the study of the legal nature of the certificate for rendering services in the social sphere is carried out through the analysis of similar legal structures characteristic of both public (housing certificate, certificate for the right to receive maternity capital) and private law (securities, gift certificate). The author substantiates the conclusion that the certificate for the provision of state (municipal) services in the social sphere can be characterized as an obligation of option type with a number of features determined by the specifics of services that constitute the subject of this contract.","PeriodicalId":433311,"journal":{"name":"Prologue: Law Journal","volume":"92 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121579102","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.21639/2313-6715.2021.4.1.
V. Babenko
The article deals with organizational and legal problems of the judicial system and proceedings in Russia in the XV - XVI centuries, the relevance of which remained in the subsequent periods of its history. In the period under consideration, judicial books as a new type of law sources became widespread. First, these were the Code of Laws (Sudebnic) of 1497 and the Code of Laws (Sudebnic) of 1550. In addition to them such sources as Stoglav of 1551, statutory books of separate orders, statutory letters of viceroyalty administration, gubnye and zemstvo letters, etc. were widely used. The subject of the research is not only normative legal acts, which regulated activity of judicial bodies, but also problems and peculiarities of Russian centralized state courts functioning during the period of reforms carried out by Tsar Ivan IV and oprichnina policy, aimed at central state power strengthening. The aim of the article is to reveal problems and peculiarities in the development of judicial system and legal procedure during the period of Russian centralized state formation and class-representative monarchy formation. The methodological basis of the work consists of historical legal and comparative legal methods. The article analyzes the causes and nature of changes occurring in the system of the judicial system and legal proceedings in Russia during the period under consideration. The author concludes that the use of the term «Moscow state» in the title of the period considerably limits the researchers' possibilities to study the regional materials concerning the peculiarities of the development of the local courts in the territories of the Volga region developed by Russia in the 16th century. The received results and conclusions can be used in studying the history of state and law.
{"title":"Organizational and Legal Problems of the Judicial System and Judicial Proceedings Development in the Russian State (XV – XVI Centuries)","authors":"V. Babenko","doi":"10.21639/2313-6715.2021.4.1.","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21639/2313-6715.2021.4.1.","url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with organizational and legal problems of the judicial system and proceedings in Russia in the XV - XVI centuries, the relevance of which remained in the subsequent periods of its history. In the period under consideration, judicial books as a new type of law sources became widespread. First, these were the Code of Laws (Sudebnic) of 1497 and the Code of Laws (Sudebnic) of 1550. In addition to them such sources as Stoglav of 1551, statutory books of separate orders, statutory letters of viceroyalty administration, gubnye and zemstvo letters, etc. were widely used. The subject of the research is not only normative legal acts, which regulated activity of judicial bodies, but also problems and peculiarities of Russian centralized state courts functioning during the period of reforms carried out by Tsar Ivan IV and oprichnina policy, aimed at central state power strengthening. The aim of the article is to reveal problems and peculiarities in the development of judicial system and legal procedure during the period of Russian centralized state formation and class-representative monarchy formation. The methodological basis of the work consists of historical legal and comparative legal methods. The article analyzes the causes and nature of changes occurring in the system of the judicial system and legal proceedings in Russia during the period under consideration. The author concludes that the use of the term «Moscow state» in the title of the period considerably limits the researchers' possibilities to study the regional materials concerning the peculiarities of the development of the local courts in the territories of the Volga region developed by Russia in the 16th century. The received results and conclusions can be used in studying the history of state and law.","PeriodicalId":433311,"journal":{"name":"Prologue: Law Journal","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116622761","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.21639/2313-6715.2022.3.3.
S. Sumenkov
The article examines the interconnection between legal awareness and legal discretion of the special subject. The author notes the particular role of that type of the special subject as a subject of law enforcement is noted. It is these subjects who exercise the powers of power of public authorities, directly applying the norms of law. The author points out some contradiction between the objectively existing diversity of social relations and the reference nature of law. In this aspect, the author pays considerable attention to the norms of a dispositive nature indicating the framework limits of the action of the law enforcement officer. This kind of a norm is initially endowed with such a quality as legal uncertainty that determines the practical significance of legal discretion. The article reveals the essence of law enforcement discretion, its role in the implementation of legal norms and individual legal regulation. The article covers the algorithms for making law enforcement decisions that are taken as a result of discretion as a special kind of thought activity of a special subject. The obvious dependence of the discretion of the law enforcement official on sense of justice of the last is emphasized. The main role is played by professional legal consciousness, consisting of various components of legal psychology and legal ideology. Practical examples prove the need for law enforcement discretion, the absence of which entails a gap in legal regulation. At the same time, the author draws the attention to the possibility of abuse of the right of both the consequence of the defective legal norms and the legal awareness of the subject of law enforcement. Attention is paid to the need for constant work both on improving legal prescriptions that allow for the possibility of law enforcement discretion and a positive impact on the legal consciousness of the subject of law enforcement.
{"title":"Legal Awareness of Special Subjects as a Determinant of Their Legal Discretion","authors":"S. Sumenkov","doi":"10.21639/2313-6715.2022.3.3.","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21639/2313-6715.2022.3.3.","url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the interconnection between legal awareness and legal discretion of the special subject. The author notes the particular role of that type of the special subject as a subject of law enforcement is noted. It is these subjects who exercise the powers of power of public authorities, directly applying the norms of law. The author points out some contradiction between the objectively existing diversity of social relations and the reference nature of law. In this aspect, the author pays considerable attention to the norms of a dispositive nature indicating the framework limits of the action of the law enforcement officer. This kind of a norm is initially endowed with such a quality as legal uncertainty that determines the practical significance of legal discretion. The article reveals the essence of law enforcement discretion, its role in the implementation of legal norms and individual legal regulation. The article covers the algorithms for making law enforcement decisions that are taken as a result of discretion as a special kind of thought activity of a special subject. The obvious dependence of the discretion of the law enforcement official on sense of justice of the last is emphasized. The main role is played by professional legal consciousness, consisting of various components of legal psychology and legal ideology. Practical examples prove the need for law enforcement discretion, the absence of which entails a gap in legal regulation. At the same time, the author draws the attention to the possibility of abuse of the right of both the consequence of the defective legal norms and the legal awareness of the subject of law enforcement. Attention is paid to the need for constant work both on improving legal prescriptions that allow for the possibility of law enforcement discretion and a positive impact on the legal consciousness of the subject of law enforcement.","PeriodicalId":433311,"journal":{"name":"Prologue: Law Journal","volume":"2 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116766492","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.21639/2313-6715.2021.1.1.
A. Makutchev
The article presents the results of the analysis of the Frankish criminal law main provisions in the Early Middle Ages, namely, the aspects of the application of punishments for the main types of crimes. This analysis was based on the norms of two sources: the Salic Law, which is deservedly considered to be one of the most important barbarian laws, and the Ripuarian Law, which is less studied in domestic historiography, which consolidated the customary law of the Ripuarian Franks. The aim of the study was a comparative analysis of the Salic and Ripuarian laws, aimed at identifying both common characteristics of criminal law for both documents, and features that reflect various aspects of the Salic and Ripuarian Franks social and economic development. In the course of the conducted research, the qualification of the main criminal offenses according to the Ripuarian and Salic Laws was determined, the characteristic features of the criminal legislation fixed by both sources were identified (class status, the predominance of material penalties, etc.). Based on the comparison of the norms of both Laws, the author also concludes that the historical value of the Ripuarian Law is higher than it is commonly believed: while repeating the norms of the Salic Law in some parts, neverthelessб it does not duplicate it, but complements and expands the characteristics of a legal institutions number.
{"title":"Crimes and Punishments according to Salic and Ripuarian Laws","authors":"A. Makutchev","doi":"10.21639/2313-6715.2021.1.1.","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21639/2313-6715.2021.1.1.","url":null,"abstract":"The article presents the results of the analysis of the Frankish criminal law main provisions in the Early Middle Ages, namely, the aspects of the application of punishments for the main types of crimes. This analysis was based on the norms of two sources: the Salic Law, which is deservedly considered to be one of the most important barbarian laws, and the Ripuarian Law, which is less studied in domestic historiography, which consolidated the customary law of the Ripuarian Franks. The aim of the study was a comparative analysis of the Salic and Ripuarian laws, aimed at identifying both common characteristics of criminal law for both documents, and features that reflect various aspects of the Salic and Ripuarian Franks social and economic development. In the course of the conducted research, the qualification of the main criminal offenses according to the Ripuarian and Salic Laws was determined, the characteristic features of the criminal legislation fixed by both sources were identified (class status, the predominance of material penalties, etc.). Based on the comparison of the norms of both Laws, the author also concludes that the historical value of the Ripuarian Law is higher than it is commonly believed: while repeating the norms of the Salic Law in some parts, neverthelessб it does not duplicate it, but complements and expands the characteristics of a legal institutions number.","PeriodicalId":433311,"journal":{"name":"Prologue: Law Journal","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117009247","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.21639/2313-6715.2019.4.5
T. Otcheskaya, T. Afanasieva
{"title":"CONDITIONS FOR RESTORATION OF THE TERM FOR APPEALS IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS AT THE REQUEST OF A PERSON NOT INVOLVED IN THE CASE","authors":"T. Otcheskaya, T. Afanasieva","doi":"10.21639/2313-6715.2019.4.5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21639/2313-6715.2019.4.5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":433311,"journal":{"name":"Prologue: Law Journal","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126466145","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.21639/2313-6715.2021.2.3.
S. M. Vorobyev, I. Kusmin
The purpose of this study is a general theoretical characterization of the discrediting factor in the mechanism of legal liability implementation. The authors indicate the negative impact of discrediting on the effectiveness of legal liability and, in general, the work of bodies and officials in bringing to justice and its implementation. Specific forms (manifestations) of discredit are named, and their analytical description is given in relation to the subject of study. The necessity of countering discrediting at various stages of the dynamics of responsibility, including law-making and subsequent law enforcement activities, is justified. The relationship between the quality of the general legal theory of legal responsibility and the interdisciplinary methodology is indicated. It is proposed to develop a scientific and legal strategy to expand the research tools for understanding the social and legal reality that develops around the organization and implementation of activities for the assignment of legal responsibility. Based on the specifics of the discrediting effect, the article discloses the specifics of the discrediting factor in relation to the system of law enforcement agencies directly involved in the mechanism of implementing legal liability. The authors use statistical data indicating the level of trust in the institutions of public power, taking into account the discrediting influence exerted on them, and formulate the basic guidelines for the intensification of a comprehensive fight against discredit in the mechanism of legal liability implementation.
{"title":"The Discrediting Factor in the Legal Responsibility Implementation Mechanism: General Theoretical Aspect","authors":"S. M. Vorobyev, I. Kusmin","doi":"10.21639/2313-6715.2021.2.3.","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21639/2313-6715.2021.2.3.","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is a general theoretical characterization of the discrediting factor in the mechanism of legal liability implementation. The authors indicate the negative impact of discrediting on the effectiveness of legal liability and, in general, the work of bodies and officials in bringing to justice and its implementation. Specific forms (manifestations) of discredit are named, and their analytical description is given in relation to the subject of study. The necessity of countering discrediting at various stages of the dynamics of responsibility, including law-making and subsequent law enforcement activities, is justified. The relationship between the quality of the general legal theory of legal responsibility and the interdisciplinary methodology is indicated. It is proposed to develop a scientific and legal strategy to expand the research tools for understanding the social and legal reality that develops around the organization and implementation of activities for the assignment of legal responsibility. Based on the specifics of the discrediting effect, the article discloses the specifics of the discrediting factor in relation to the system of law enforcement agencies directly involved in the mechanism of implementing legal liability. The authors use statistical data indicating the level of trust in the institutions of public power, taking into account the discrediting influence exerted on them, and formulate the basic guidelines for the intensification of a comprehensive fight against discredit in the mechanism of legal liability implementation.","PeriodicalId":433311,"journal":{"name":"Prologue: Law Journal","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117269614","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.21639/2313-6715.2020.2.3
D. Parkhomenko
{"title":"The crime for the first time and its reflection in the criminal legislation of Russia: history of issue","authors":"D. Parkhomenko","doi":"10.21639/2313-6715.2020.2.3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21639/2313-6715.2020.2.3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":433311,"journal":{"name":"Prologue: Law Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128428259","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.21639/2313-6715.2020.3.8
E. Madaev
{"title":"Theoretical and Legal Problems of Introducing the Term «Senator» to the Constitution of the Russian Federation","authors":"E. Madaev","doi":"10.21639/2313-6715.2020.3.8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21639/2313-6715.2020.3.8","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":433311,"journal":{"name":"Prologue: Law Journal","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132225366","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：