Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.21639/2313-6715.2020.2.9
A. Ushakova
{"title":"Specialty 12.00.06: a statistical study of subject matters and the number of dissertations","authors":"A. Ushakova","doi":"10.21639/2313-6715.2020.2.9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21639/2313-6715.2020.2.9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":433311,"journal":{"name":"Prologue: Law Journal","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125660134","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.21639/2313-6715.2021.4.5.
A. Suslov
The article analyzes the problems associated with the refusals of public authorities to requests of participants in civil law relations. The significance of civil studies of this problem is argued. It is proposed to distinguish two types of refusals of public authorities to participants of civil relations: refusals to perform legal actions and refusals to perform actual actions. The consequence of the first ones will be the non-occurrence of civil legal relations (legal fact, object, legal personality), the consequence of the second – the possibility of committed actions qualification by subjects of civil law as unlawful. Legal nature of refusal of public authorities to participants of civil law relations is analyzed. The author concludes that it is impossible to qualify such refusals as unilateral transactions, despite the fact that these actions give rise to civil law consequences, proposes to characterize these types of refusals as a special category – a legal obligation, pays attention to the need to clarify terminology and to distinguish between the concepts «issuing consents» and «issuing authorizations». The issues related to contestation of public authorities’ refusals are examined. The author concludes that such refusals affect the focus and the course of the enforcement process in private law, and therefore this technical and legal method is subject to further study in the framework of civic studies.
{"title":"Refusals of Public Authorities to Participants in Civil Law Relations","authors":"A. Suslov","doi":"10.21639/2313-6715.2021.4.5.","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21639/2313-6715.2021.4.5.","url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the problems associated with the refusals of public authorities to requests of participants in civil law relations. The significance of civil studies of this problem is argued. It is proposed to distinguish two types of refusals of public authorities to participants of civil relations: refusals to perform legal actions and refusals to perform actual actions. The consequence of the first ones will be the non-occurrence of civil legal relations (legal fact, object, legal personality), the consequence of the second – the possibility of committed actions qualification by subjects of civil law as unlawful. Legal nature of refusal of public authorities to participants of civil law relations is analyzed. The author concludes that it is impossible to qualify such refusals as unilateral transactions, despite the fact that these actions give rise to civil law consequences, proposes to characterize these types of refusals as a special category – a legal obligation, pays attention to the need to clarify terminology and to distinguish between the concepts «issuing consents» and «issuing authorizations». The issues related to contestation of public authorities’ refusals are examined. The author concludes that such refusals affect the focus and the course of the enforcement process in private law, and therefore this technical and legal method is subject to further study in the framework of civic studies.","PeriodicalId":433311,"journal":{"name":"Prologue: Law Journal","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126027198","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.21639/2313-6715.2019.2.7
V. V. Mishin, Zaozersk Garrison Military Court Murmansk
{"title":"o the issue of conditions and grounds of the criminal procedure application of art. 25 (Code of criminal procedure of the Russian Federation)","authors":"V. V. Mishin, Zaozersk Garrison Military Court Murmansk","doi":"10.21639/2313-6715.2019.2.7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21639/2313-6715.2019.2.7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":433311,"journal":{"name":"Prologue: Law Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130338820","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.21639/2313-6715.2021.4.8.
P.Yu. Medyankin
The subject of the study is the provisions of corporate legislation on the corporate agreement in terms of analysis of non-standard for corporate relations legal construction of the contract between creditors of the company and other third parties with participants of the economic society – the so-called «quasi-corporate agreement». Despite the annually increasing popularity of this legal construction, legislation in this area contains many legal gaps, which have not yet been filled by law enforcement practice. The positions of leading domestic legal scholars also remain ambiguous. Using members of the joint stock company board of directors as an example, the author raises questions concerning the subject composition of quasi-corporate agreements. Can a member of the joint stock company board of directors, who is not a shareholder of the company, conclude a quasi-corporate agreement with creditors of the company and other third parties? The author concludes that the narrowing of the circle of third parties in the quasi-corporate agreement is inexpedient. Moreover, members of a company`s board of directors are competent to act as a party of such an agreement. Restricting exclusively by participants of a business company the list of persons who may act both on the side of a business company and on the side of third parties in quasi-corporate contracts concluded in the order of clause 9 article 67.2 of the Civil Code, does not meet the original (legislatively enshrined) purpose of such agreements.
{"title":"Participation of a Member of the Board of Directors in a Quasi-corporate Agreement: Legal Basis and Problematic Aspects","authors":"P.Yu. Medyankin","doi":"10.21639/2313-6715.2021.4.8.","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21639/2313-6715.2021.4.8.","url":null,"abstract":"The subject of the study is the provisions of corporate legislation on the corporate agreement in terms of analysis of non-standard for corporate relations legal construction of the contract between creditors of the company and other third parties with participants of the economic society – the so-called «quasi-corporate agreement». Despite the annually increasing popularity of this legal construction, legislation in this area contains many legal gaps, which have not yet been filled by law enforcement practice. The positions of leading domestic legal scholars also remain ambiguous. Using members of the joint stock company board of directors as an example, the author raises questions concerning the subject composition of quasi-corporate agreements. Can a member of the joint stock company board of directors, who is not a shareholder of the company, conclude a quasi-corporate agreement with creditors of the company and other third parties? The author concludes that the narrowing of the circle of third parties in the quasi-corporate agreement is inexpedient. Moreover, members of a company`s board of directors are competent to act as a party of such an agreement. Restricting exclusively by participants of a business company the list of persons who may act both on the side of a business company and on the side of third parties in quasi-corporate contracts concluded in the order of clause 9 article 67.2 of the Civil Code, does not meet the original (legislatively enshrined) purpose of such agreements.","PeriodicalId":433311,"journal":{"name":"Prologue: Law Journal","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132253013","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.21639/2313-6715.2020.4.4
A. Petrič
The purpose of this study is to identify areas of public life for which legal self-regulation is relevant as a social regulator and an expression of independent and initiative activity of subjects of modern legal relations, characterized by a high level of organization of their subjects and a wide range of opportunities for solving problems arising in the course of their activities. The article describes the types of relationships developing at the national level and addressed through the rules of legal regulation, as well as in the context of the study the author examines the peculiarities of self-regulation application at the supranational level and defines the scope of the regulation and its peculiarities at this level. In addition, the author considers the relationship between legal self-regulation and state legal rules when considering each of the areas of legal self-regulation application, the degree of their interdependence and the line between freedom and coercion of subjects of such legal relations. The author identifies a variety of areas of legal relations regulated by legal self-regulation rules, particularly of such rules as well as the complexity of the legal self-regulation system, formed on the grounds of its scope. The author concludes on the further expansion of these areas, as well as on supplementing them with normative legal regulation.
{"title":"System of Legal Self-regulation in Light of its Application in Various Sphere of Public Relations","authors":"A. Petrič","doi":"10.21639/2313-6715.2020.4.4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21639/2313-6715.2020.4.4","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to identify areas of public life for which legal self-regulation is relevant as a social regulator and an expression of independent and initiative activity of subjects of modern legal relations, characterized by a high level of organization of their subjects and a wide range of opportunities for solving problems arising in the course of their activities. The article describes the types of relationships developing at the national level and addressed through the rules of legal regulation, as well as in the context of the study the author examines the peculiarities of self-regulation application at the supranational level and defines the scope of the regulation and its peculiarities at this level. In addition, the author considers the relationship between legal self-regulation and state legal rules when considering each of the areas of legal self-regulation application, the degree of their interdependence and the line between freedom and coercion of subjects of such legal relations. The author identifies a variety of areas of legal relations regulated by legal self-regulation rules, particularly of such rules as well as the complexity of the legal self-regulation system, formed on the grounds of its scope. The author concludes on the further expansion of these areas, as well as on supplementing them with normative legal regulation.","PeriodicalId":433311,"journal":{"name":"Prologue: Law Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131327435","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.21639/2313-6715.2021.1.5.
I. Minnikes, M.D. Esitashvili
The article discusses the trends in the development of legislation regulating the aviation business in the Russian Federation, in particular, theoretical and practical issues related to the efficiency and safety of air transportation, as well as the search for a balance between them. The article reveals the history of forming the concepts «transport security» and «aviation security» in the Soviet and modern Russian legislation. In order to clarify the Russian state authorities` powers distribution in the field of transport security and their consolidation in the current legislation, the authors investigate the features of the powers of these bodies in the historical retrospect from the beginning of the XIX century. The authors critically analyze the implementation of the certain provisions of the Government of the Russian Federation «On the approval of requirements for ensuring transport security, taking into account the safety levels for air transport vehicles», the implementation of which causes significant problems for air transport operators. It is established that the implementation of these provisions is difficult: it will significantly aggravate the existing economic situation of aircraft operators, and in combination with the general negative trends in the world can lead to a possible mass bankruptcy of domestic small and medium-sized airlines. The authors suggest ways to solve the identified problems. In particular, a possible solution in finding a balance between transport safety and the cost-effectiveness of air transportation may be a «transition period», during which the expansion of the requirements under study will affect only new aircraft.
{"title":"Legal Regulation of the Aviation Business in Russia: Finding a Balance between Ensuring Transport Security and Air Transportation Efficiency","authors":"I. Minnikes, M.D. Esitashvili","doi":"10.21639/2313-6715.2021.1.5.","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21639/2313-6715.2021.1.5.","url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses the trends in the development of legislation regulating the aviation business in the Russian Federation, in particular, theoretical and practical issues related to the efficiency and safety of air transportation, as well as the search for a balance between them. The article reveals the history of forming the concepts «transport security» and «aviation security» in the Soviet and modern Russian legislation. In order to clarify the Russian state authorities` powers distribution in the field of transport security and their consolidation in the current legislation, the authors investigate the features of the powers of these bodies in the historical retrospect from the beginning of the XIX century. The authors critically analyze the implementation of the certain provisions of the Government of the Russian Federation «On the approval of requirements for ensuring transport security, taking into account the safety levels for air transport vehicles», the implementation of which causes significant problems for air transport operators. It is established that the implementation of these provisions is difficult: it will significantly aggravate the existing economic situation of aircraft operators, and in combination with the general negative trends in the world can lead to a possible mass bankruptcy of domestic small and medium-sized airlines. The authors suggest ways to solve the identified problems. In particular, a possible solution in finding a balance between transport safety and the cost-effectiveness of air transportation may be a «transition period», during which the expansion of the requirements under study will affect only new aircraft.","PeriodicalId":433311,"journal":{"name":"Prologue: Law Journal","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115172293","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.21639/2313-6715.2021.2.1.
I. Yagofarova
The article is devoted to the introduction of digital technologies in law-making activities. The process of digitalization has actively affected economic relations, which has led to the transformation of public administration. Law, being the main regulator of public relations, is also undergoing significant changes. The subject of the study is the results of the digitalization of law-making activities, which leave an imprint on the entire system of state and legal relations. The article presents a bibliographic review of modern works on this issue, describes the main trends in this area, and assesses the practical results of the digital technologies impact on law-making. The models of digitalization are analyzed: automation of all processes, which assumes the absolute exclusion of a person and the preservation of human participation at the stage of making the final decision. The author investigates the main stages of law-making activity, where the use of digital technologies is possible: the formation of law-making initiatives; the process of preparing a normative legal act; discussion of the draft normative legal act; the voting process; the process of promulgation and publication. The author provides the examples of specific electronic platforms: «Russian Public Initiative», the System for Ensuring Legislative Activity, Simplex+, Reaching everyone for active citizenship & home (REACH) and specific technologies (ML-model, LL-model, blockchain), both already used and developed in Russia and abroad. It is indicated that digital technologies can be used to systematize regulatory legal acts, and the question of using digital technologies in predicting the future directions of legal regulation is raised. It is concluded that it is necessary to determine the main directions and principles of digitalization of law-making, the goals and limits of the introduction of digital technologies in the law-making process.
{"title":"Digital Technologies in Law-making Activity: Theoretical and Legal Aspect","authors":"I. Yagofarova","doi":"10.21639/2313-6715.2021.2.1.","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21639/2313-6715.2021.2.1.","url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the introduction of digital technologies in law-making activities. The process of digitalization has actively affected economic relations, which has led to the transformation of public administration. Law, being the main regulator of public relations, is also undergoing significant changes. The subject of the study is the results of the digitalization of law-making activities, which leave an imprint on the entire system of state and legal relations. The article presents a bibliographic review of modern works on this issue, describes the main trends in this area, and assesses the practical results of the digital technologies impact on law-making. The models of digitalization are analyzed: automation of all processes, which assumes the absolute exclusion of a person and the preservation of human participation at the stage of making the final decision. The author investigates the main stages of law-making activity, where the use of digital technologies is possible: the formation of law-making initiatives; the process of preparing a normative legal act; discussion of the draft normative legal act; the voting process; the process of promulgation and publication. The author provides the examples of specific electronic platforms: «Russian Public Initiative», the System for Ensuring Legislative Activity, Simplex+, Reaching everyone for active citizenship & home (REACH) and specific technologies (ML-model, LL-model, blockchain), both already used and developed in Russia and abroad. It is indicated that digital technologies can be used to systematize regulatory legal acts, and the question of using digital technologies in predicting the future directions of legal regulation is raised. It is concluded that it is necessary to determine the main directions and principles of digitalization of law-making, the goals and limits of the introduction of digital technologies in the law-making process.","PeriodicalId":433311,"journal":{"name":"Prologue: Law Journal","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124314529","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.21639/2313-6715.2021.4.2.
E. Aleksandrova
The introduction of the principle of unity of public authority has led to the development of a new federal law «On the general principles of the public authority organization in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation». In this regard, the author set the goal: to determine how the provisions of this law change the system and status of public authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. When considering these issues a wide range of methods was used, including the method of analysis, comparison, logical, deduction and generalization. As a result of the study the features of the state power system of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation were identified, the main of which, in our view, is the attribution of the highest official to the mandatory bodies of state power of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation; the consistency of existing models of state power organization of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation was outlined. In this case, due to a different legal technique and the allocation of provisions on the highest official in a separate chapter of the law, there is a certain confusion with the definition of his position in the system of public authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. The author supports the provisions of the law on the inclusion of the highest official of a constituent entity of the Russian Federation among the mandatory in the system of public authorities of a constituent entity of the Russian Federation, and justifies the need to include provisions on it in the chapter on executive power bodies.
{"title":"Organization of Public Power in the Constituent Entities of the Russian Federation: Reforming or Improving?","authors":"E. Aleksandrova","doi":"10.21639/2313-6715.2021.4.2.","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21639/2313-6715.2021.4.2.","url":null,"abstract":"The introduction of the principle of unity of public authority has led to the development of a new federal law «On the general principles of the public authority organization in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation». In this regard, the author set the goal: to determine how the provisions of this law change the system and status of public authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. When considering these issues a wide range of methods was used, including the method of analysis, comparison, logical, deduction and generalization. As a result of the study the features of the state power system of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation were identified, the main of which, in our view, is the attribution of the highest official to the mandatory bodies of state power of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation; the consistency of existing models of state power organization of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation was outlined. In this case, due to a different legal technique and the allocation of provisions on the highest official in a separate chapter of the law, there is a certain confusion with the definition of his position in the system of public authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. The author supports the provisions of the law on the inclusion of the highest official of a constituent entity of the Russian Federation among the mandatory in the system of public authorities of a constituent entity of the Russian Federation, and justifies the need to include provisions on it in the chapter on executive power bodies.","PeriodicalId":433311,"journal":{"name":"Prologue: Law Journal","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121317239","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.21639/2313-6715.2021.4.1.
V. Babenko
The article deals with organizational and legal problems of the judicial system and proceedings in Russia in the XV - XVI centuries, the relevance of which remained in the subsequent periods of its history. In the period under consideration, judicial books as a new type of law sources became widespread. First, these were the Code of Laws (Sudebnic) of 1497 and the Code of Laws (Sudebnic) of 1550. In addition to them such sources as Stoglav of 1551, statutory books of separate orders, statutory letters of viceroyalty administration, gubnye and zemstvo letters, etc. were widely used. The subject of the research is not only normative legal acts, which regulated activity of judicial bodies, but also problems and peculiarities of Russian centralized state courts functioning during the period of reforms carried out by Tsar Ivan IV and oprichnina policy, aimed at central state power strengthening. The aim of the article is to reveal problems and peculiarities in the development of judicial system and legal procedure during the period of Russian centralized state formation and class-representative monarchy formation. The methodological basis of the work consists of historical legal and comparative legal methods. The article analyzes the causes and nature of changes occurring in the system of the judicial system and legal proceedings in Russia during the period under consideration. The author concludes that the use of the term «Moscow state» in the title of the period considerably limits the researchers' possibilities to study the regional materials concerning the peculiarities of the development of the local courts in the territories of the Volga region developed by Russia in the 16th century. The received results and conclusions can be used in studying the history of state and law.
{"title":"Organizational and Legal Problems of the Judicial System and Judicial Proceedings Development in the Russian State (XV – XVI Centuries)","authors":"V. Babenko","doi":"10.21639/2313-6715.2021.4.1.","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21639/2313-6715.2021.4.1.","url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with organizational and legal problems of the judicial system and proceedings in Russia in the XV - XVI centuries, the relevance of which remained in the subsequent periods of its history. In the period under consideration, judicial books as a new type of law sources became widespread. First, these were the Code of Laws (Sudebnic) of 1497 and the Code of Laws (Sudebnic) of 1550. In addition to them such sources as Stoglav of 1551, statutory books of separate orders, statutory letters of viceroyalty administration, gubnye and zemstvo letters, etc. were widely used. The subject of the research is not only normative legal acts, which regulated activity of judicial bodies, but also problems and peculiarities of Russian centralized state courts functioning during the period of reforms carried out by Tsar Ivan IV and oprichnina policy, aimed at central state power strengthening. The aim of the article is to reveal problems and peculiarities in the development of judicial system and legal procedure during the period of Russian centralized state formation and class-representative monarchy formation. The methodological basis of the work consists of historical legal and comparative legal methods. The article analyzes the causes and nature of changes occurring in the system of the judicial system and legal proceedings in Russia during the period under consideration. The author concludes that the use of the term «Moscow state» in the title of the period considerably limits the researchers' possibilities to study the regional materials concerning the peculiarities of the development of the local courts in the territories of the Volga region developed by Russia in the 16th century. The received results and conclusions can be used in studying the history of state and law.","PeriodicalId":433311,"journal":{"name":"Prologue: Law Journal","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116622761","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.21639/2313-6715.2019.1.5
E. Sidorova
{"title":"ON THE INDIVIDUAL DETERMINANTS OF CRIMES COMMITTED BY STUDENTS OF SECONDARY AND VOCATIONAL EDUCATION ORGANIZATIONS","authors":"E. Sidorova","doi":"10.21639/2313-6715.2019.1.5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21639/2313-6715.2019.1.5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":433311,"journal":{"name":"Prologue: Law Journal","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124711890","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：