Pub Date : 2020-01-01DOI: 10.26913/avant.2020.02.12
Patrizio Lo Presti
This paper argues that first-person singular Iand first-person plural we-intentionality are constituted in normative second-person relations. Their relata are individuals who mutually recognize each other as loci of responsibility. Such relations constitute an I–You, which is argued to be sufficient for both singular Iand plural we-intentionality. Whenever there is I-intentionality there is we-intentionality, because whenever the relevant second-person relations obtain, conditions sufficient for both are satisfied. Consequently, the possibility of autonomous individual I-intentionality as well as plurally shared we-intentionality depends on at least two individuals involved in normative mutual recognition. Neither individual is an intentional ‘I’ independently of entering the I–You, and when they do so they are an intentional ‘we.’
{"title":"Individuality, Collectivity and the Intersubjective Constitution of Intentionality","authors":"Patrizio Lo Presti","doi":"10.26913/avant.2020.02.12","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26913/avant.2020.02.12","url":null,"abstract":"This paper argues that first-person singular Iand first-person plural we-intentionality are constituted in normative second-person relations. Their relata are individuals who mutually recognize each other as loci of responsibility. Such relations constitute an I–You, which is argued to be sufficient for both singular Iand plural we-intentionality. Whenever there is I-intentionality there is we-intentionality, because whenever the relevant second-person relations obtain, conditions sufficient for both are satisfied. Consequently, the possibility of autonomous individual I-intentionality as well as plurally shared we-intentionality depends on at least two individuals involved in normative mutual recognition. Neither individual is an intentional ‘I’ independently of entering the I–You, and when they do so they are an intentional ‘we.’","PeriodicalId":43453,"journal":{"name":"Avant","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79019127","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-01-01DOI: 10.26913/avant.2020.03.28
Piotr Sieńko
{"title":"Czy człowiek jest prostą konstrukcją i czy gender nam zagraża? Recenzja książki Medyczne, bioetyczne, psychosocjologiczne i prawne aspekty tożsamości płci","authors":"Piotr Sieńko","doi":"10.26913/avant.2020.03.28","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26913/avant.2020.03.28","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43453,"journal":{"name":"Avant","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79086942","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-01-01DOI: 10.26913/avant.2020.02.13
D. Dennett
Paweł Grabarczyk explores the shortcomings of my meme theory, concentrating on my rather perfunctory treatment of meaning in BBB. He notes that I deem words the best examples of memes and claims that if I don’t have an account of the meanings of words as memes, I can hardly use memes to explain comprehension. He is right, but I think that I have provided the elements of an account of meaning of words that can be readily united and presented to meet his excellent challenge. In BBB I concentrated on phonology and semantics, leaving syntax largely untouched, since I couldn’t see through the fog of war among the linguists on this contentious topic, and Grabarczyk also sets syntax aside, but recently my own thinking on how to handle it has been informed by Daniel Dor’s remarkable book, The Instruction of Imagination (2015), which analyzes language as a “social communication technology,” banishing most of the Chomskian innateness dogmas and replacing them with reverse engineering of culturally transmitted habits and dispositions. Dor ignores meme theory and doesn’t rely as much as he should on evolutionary processes (and free-floating rationales), but he has clearly set out a reimagined set of specs for language, filling in many details only dimly suggested by my sketchy account. I recommend it to all serious thinkers about the phenomena of language.
pawez Grabarczyk探讨了我的模因理论的缺点，重点是我对BBB中意义的敷衍处理。他指出，我认为文字是模因的最好例子，并声称，如果我不把文字的含义作为模因来解释，我就很难用模因来解释理解。他是对的，但我认为我已经提供了一个词的意义解释的要素，可以很容易地统一和呈现，以满足他的出色的挑战。在BBB中，我专注于音韵学和语意学，基本不涉及语法，因为我无法透过语言学家在这个有争议的话题上的战争迷雾，格拉巴兹克也把语法放在一边，但最近我自己对如何处理它的思考受到了丹尼尔·多尔(Daniel Dor)的杰出著作《想象力的指导》(the Instruction of Imagination, 2015)的启发，该书将语言分析为一种“社会交流技术”。摒弃大多数乔姆斯基的先天教条，代之以文化传播习惯和性格的逆向工程。多尔忽略了模因理论，也没有过多地依赖于进化过程(以及自由浮动的基本原理)，但他明确地为语言设定了一套重新构想的规范，填补了许多细节，这些细节只是我粗略的描述中隐约提出的。我向所有认真思考语言现象的人推荐这本书。
{"title":"Comment on “Can memes explain the birth of comprehension?”","authors":"D. Dennett","doi":"10.26913/avant.2020.02.13","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26913/avant.2020.02.13","url":null,"abstract":"Paweł Grabarczyk explores the shortcomings of my meme theory, concentrating on my rather perfunctory treatment of meaning in BBB. He notes that I deem words the best examples of memes and claims that if I don’t have an account of the meanings of words as memes, I can hardly use memes to explain comprehension. He is right, but I think that I have provided the elements of an account of meaning of words that can be readily united and presented to meet his excellent challenge. In BBB I concentrated on phonology and semantics, leaving syntax largely untouched, since I couldn’t see through the fog of war among the linguists on this contentious topic, and Grabarczyk also sets syntax aside, but recently my own thinking on how to handle it has been informed by Daniel Dor’s remarkable book, The Instruction of Imagination (2015), which analyzes language as a “social communication technology,” banishing most of the Chomskian innateness dogmas and replacing them with reverse engineering of culturally transmitted habits and dispositions. Dor ignores meme theory and doesn’t rely as much as he should on evolutionary processes (and free-floating rationales), but he has clearly set out a reimagined set of specs for language, filling in many details only dimly suggested by my sketchy account. I recommend it to all serious thinkers about the phenomena of language.","PeriodicalId":43453,"journal":{"name":"Avant","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89946907","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-01-01DOI: 10.26913/avant.2020.03.25
R. Poczobut
{"title":"Koherencyjna koncepcja błędu reprezentacyjnego w kontekście badań nad mechanizmami powstawania błędnych reprezentacji pamięciowych","authors":"R. Poczobut","doi":"10.26913/avant.2020.03.25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26913/avant.2020.03.25","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43453,"journal":{"name":"Avant","volume":"420 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75764773","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-01-01DOI: 10.26913/avant.2020.03.36
Edyta Lorek-Jezińska
This article examines the recorded city soundscape and its relation to dance in Nadia VadoriGauthier’s resistant dancing project Une minute de danse par jour started in 2015. Referring to the concepts of site and non-site, site-specific performance, sonoric landscape and Cage’s experiment with city soundscapes, I look into three types of sites used by the dancer: the street, means or sites of transport and isolated places (cemeteries). I am particularly interested in the ways in which the found sound determines the dancer’s movements and how it is framed both by the dancer and the camera.
本文考察了Nadia vadorigier于2015年开始的抵抗舞蹈项目“一分钟的舞蹈”(Une minute de dance par jour)中所记录的城市声景及其与舞蹈的关系。参考场地和非场地、场地特定表演、声景观和凯奇的城市声景观实验的概念，我研究了舞者使用的三种类型的场地:街道、交通工具或场地和孤立的地方(墓地)。我特别感兴趣的是发现的声音如何决定舞者的动作，以及它是如何被舞者和相机框起来的。
{"title":"Sound, Site and the City in Nadia Vadori-Gauthier’s Resistant Dancing Project ‘Une minute de danse par jour’","authors":"Edyta Lorek-Jezińska","doi":"10.26913/avant.2020.03.36","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26913/avant.2020.03.36","url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the recorded city soundscape and its relation to dance in Nadia VadoriGauthier’s resistant dancing project Une minute de danse par jour started in 2015. Referring to the concepts of site and non-site, site-specific performance, sonoric landscape and Cage’s experiment with city soundscapes, I look into three types of sites used by the dancer: the street, means or sites of transport and isolated places (cemeteries). I am particularly interested in the ways in which the found sound determines the dancer’s movements and how it is framed both by the dancer and the camera.","PeriodicalId":43453,"journal":{"name":"Avant","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75913816","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-01-01DOI: 10.26913/avant.2020.03.10
Edyta B. Pietrzak
{"title":"Feministyczna politologia. O dwóch siostrach: Krytyce i Teorii","authors":"Edyta B. Pietrzak","doi":"10.26913/avant.2020.03.10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26913/avant.2020.03.10","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43453,"journal":{"name":"Avant","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78323174","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-01-01DOI: 10.26913/avant.2020.02.07
Adrianna Smurzyńska
The aim of this article is to examine the relation between self-understanding and other-under-standing. In this context, three theories of mentalization will be considered: theory theory, simulation theory and the person model theory. Two types of issues will be analyzed: (I) whether the abilities involved in self- and other-understanding are identical or diverse and (II) whether the abilities of self- and other-understanding are distinct or intertwined. These questions will be applied to theory theory, simulation theory and the person model theory; they will also be placed in the context of selected research concerning this issue.
{"title":"Relations between self-understanding and other-understanding: similarities and interactions","authors":"Adrianna Smurzyńska","doi":"10.26913/avant.2020.02.07","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26913/avant.2020.02.07","url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this article is to examine the relation between self-understanding and other-under-standing. In this context, three theories of mentalization will be considered: theory theory, simulation theory and the person model theory. Two types of issues will be analyzed: (I) whether the abilities involved in self- and other-understanding are identical or diverse and (II) whether the abilities of self- and other-understanding are distinct or intertwined. These questions will be applied to theory theory, simulation theory and the person model theory; they will also be placed in the context of selected research concerning this issue.","PeriodicalId":43453,"journal":{"name":"Avant","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74018683","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：