Even though we are at the ning of the 21st century there is still a blindness to gender, as it is evident in the paper that I comment: El genero en el analisis de la violencia contra las mujeres en la pareja [Gender in the analysis of intimate partner violence against women]. The problem is: how are we going to be able to end with that blindness? The proposal presented here is very clear: institutionalizing generelogy, which represents a considerable advance with respect to gender studies, which would thus be coherently integrated. From this perspective, the gender goes from being a mere category of analysis (important as it has been until now) to a nationally and internationally recognized area of study, under conditions similar to those of other scientific disciplines already fully recognized, such as psychology, medicine, or sociology, among others. Some of the study nuclei of this new discipline are already being widely investigated, such as gender identities, masculinities and femininities, roles, stereotypes, status, or gender asymmetries, along with services, laws, and intervention programs whose ultimate goal is gender equality.
尽管我们正处于21世纪初，但人们仍然对性别视而不见，正如我评论的论文中所表明的那样：El generao en El analisis de la violencia contra las mujeres en la pareja[亲密伴侣暴力侵害妇女行为分析中的性别]。问题是：我们如何才能结束这种失明？这里提出的建议非常明确：将遗传学制度化，这代表着在性别研究方面取得了相当大的进步，因此，性别研究将被连贯地整合在一起。从这个角度来看，在与心理学、医学或社会学等已经得到充分认可的其他科学学科类似的条件下，性别从一个纯粹的分析类别（迄今为止一直很重要）变成了一个国家和国际公认的研究领域。这一新学科的一些研究核心已经在广泛调查中，如性别认同、男性气质和女性气质、角色、刻板印象、地位或性别不对称，以及最终目标是性别平等的服务、法律和干预计划。
{"title":"La Ceguera de Género frente a una Generología. Comentario a Ferrer-Pérez y Bosch-Fiol, 2019","authors":"Juan J. Fernández","doi":"10.5093/APJ2019A5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5093/APJ2019A5","url":null,"abstract":"Even though we are at the ning of the 21st century there is still a blindness to gender, as it is evident in the paper that I comment: El genero en el analisis de la violencia contra las mujeres en la pareja [Gender in the analysis of intimate partner violence against women]. The problem is: how are we going to be able to end with that blindness? The proposal presented here is very clear: institutionalizing generelogy, which represents a considerable advance with respect to gender studies, which would thus be coherently integrated. From this perspective, the gender goes from being a mere category of analysis (important as it has been until now) to a nationally and internationally recognized area of study, under conditions similar to those of other scientific disciplines already fully recognized, such as psychology, medicine, or sociology, among others. Some of the study nuclei of this new discipline are already being widely investigated, such as gender identities, masculinities and femininities, roles, stereotypes, status, or gender asymmetries, along with services, laws, and intervention programs whose ultimate goal is gender equality.","PeriodicalId":44109,"journal":{"name":"Anuario De Psicologia Juridica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2019-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44220074","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
María Isabel Salinas, Rodrigo Landabur, Felipe Antonio Gálvez, Marcelo Balboa, C. Vásquez, I. González, V. Molina, M. Halpern, María P. Contreras
Cases of homicidal children are scarce, but they have great social and legislative impact, leading to the study of risk and protector factors of early criminal activity. Given the only record in Chile of a homicidal child, the objective of this study was to the individual and contextual risk factors associated with such homicidal behavior of a child under 10 years of age toward a pair. A unique case design was used that involved a multidisciplinary diagnosis, with neuropsychological, individual, and family, clinical, and psychiatric evaluations. The main findings are scarce cognitive flexibility in the child and emotional feedback in their family relationships, which would be associated with risk factors – family education guidelines, personality characteristics, and use of time (playing violent video games – and could explain the homicidal behavior, where it would be difficult for the child to stop the violent behavior once initiated, in an emotionally demanding context.
{"title":"Factores de Riesgo Asociados a la Conducta Homicida de un Niño hacia un Par","authors":"María Isabel Salinas, Rodrigo Landabur, Felipe Antonio Gálvez, Marcelo Balboa, C. Vásquez, I. González, V. Molina, M. Halpern, María P. Contreras","doi":"10.5093/APJ2018A12","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5093/APJ2018A12","url":null,"abstract":"Cases of homicidal children are scarce, but they have great social and legislative impact, leading to the study of risk and protector factors of early criminal activity. Given the only record in Chile of a homicidal child, the objective of this study was to the individual and contextual risk factors associated with such homicidal behavior of a child under 10 years of age toward a pair. A unique case design was used that involved a multidisciplinary diagnosis, with neuropsychological, individual, and family, clinical, and psychiatric evaluations. The main findings are scarce cognitive flexibility in the child and emotional feedback in their family relationships, which would be associated with risk factors – family education guidelines, personality characteristics, and use of time (playing violent video games – and could explain the homicidal behavior, where it would be difficult for the child to stop the violent behavior once initiated, in an emotionally demanding context.","PeriodicalId":44109,"journal":{"name":"Anuario De Psicologia Juridica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2019-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44671325","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The intimate partner homicide is a social problem affecting immigrant women primarily for their greater risk of being killed, existing an overrepresentation of both immi victims and perpetrators. The present study explores the existing difference in domestic homicides committed by immis and Spanish aggressors comparing sociodemographic factors of the offender, characteristics of the relationship, history of violent behavior, modus operandi, and post-crime behavior. Through the analysis of final court judgements, a sample of 168 cases of murders, homicides, or attempts taking place in Spain between the years 2000 and 2011 was gathered. Data obtained was d with Student’s t-test and chi-square test. The groups showed significant differences in the age of aggressors, presence of children shared with the partner and arguments before the attack, presenting few differences regarding the risk factors that are studied.
{"title":"Homicidios en la Pareja: Explorando las Diferencias entre Agresores Inmigrantes y Españoles","authors":"Miguel Ángel Soria-Verde, Elena M. Pufulete","doi":"10.5093/APJ2018A14","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5093/APJ2018A14","url":null,"abstract":"The intimate partner homicide is a social problem affecting immigrant women primarily for their greater risk of being killed, existing an overrepresentation of both immi victims and perpetrators. The present study explores the existing difference in domestic homicides committed by immis and Spanish aggressors comparing sociodemographic factors of the offender, characteristics of the relationship, history of violent behavior, modus operandi, and post-crime behavior. Through the analysis of final court judgements, a sample of 168 cases of murders, homicides, or attempts taking place in Spain between the years 2000 and 2011 was gathered. Data obtained was d with Student’s t-test and chi-square test. The groups showed significant differences in the age of aggressors, presence of children shared with the partner and arguments before the attack, presenting few differences regarding the risk factors that are studied.","PeriodicalId":44109,"journal":{"name":"Anuario De Psicologia Juridica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2019-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45415425","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pablo Buil-Legaz, José J. Burón-Álvarez, J. Bembibre
The social concern about offenses committed by minors has been reflected in the Organic Law 8/2006, which modifies the Organic Law 5/2000 that regulates criminal responsibility of minors in Spain. However, this group of delinquent minors is heterogeneous and diverse variables have been described in different levels of individual development that would explain emergence and relapse of such behaviors. The aim of the study is to analyse the socio-demographic profile and the criminal typology of juvenile offenders in a probation in Granada province from 2014 to 2017. Methodologically, data were ed from the annual reports of the Integral Service of Open Resources, which d a sample of 2,691 minors. The profile describes a male, 16-18 years old and of Spanish origin. A low academic level and inadequate parenting practices would be relevant risk factors. The main offences are injuries and damages to property.
{"title":"Perfil Sociodemográfico y Delictivo de los Menores Infractores en Medio Abierto en Granada de 2014 a 2017. Análisis Descriptivo y Evolución","authors":"Pablo Buil-Legaz, José J. Burón-Álvarez, J. Bembibre","doi":"10.5093/APJ2019A2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5093/APJ2019A2","url":null,"abstract":"The social concern about offenses committed by minors has been reflected in the Organic Law 8/2006, which modifies the Organic Law 5/2000 that regulates criminal responsibility of minors in Spain. However, this group of delinquent minors is heterogeneous and diverse variables have been described in different levels of individual development that would explain emergence and relapse of such behaviors. The aim of the study is to analyse the socio-demographic profile and the criminal typology of juvenile offenders in a probation in Granada province from 2014 to 2017. Methodologically, data were ed from the annual reports of the Integral Service of Open Resources, which d a sample of 2,691 minors. The profile describes a male, 16-18 years old and of Spanish origin. A low academic level and inadequate parenting practices would be relevant risk factors. The main offences are injuries and damages to property.","PeriodicalId":44109,"journal":{"name":"Anuario De Psicologia Juridica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2019-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49304398","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Being able to determine that an instrument predicts behavior such as violence or recidivism is one of the main objectives of legal psychology. Predictive validity, as it is known, allows evaluating this characteristic. This type of validity has been evaluated through various techniques, such as contingency , sensitivity, specificity, andROC curves. However, these techniques do not address a major statistical problem: data censorship that occurs in prospective studies, since in many cases the subjects will not relapse during the follow-up performed. Survival analysis is a technique that allows taking this information into consideration and modeling the time until a certain event happens. Through different approaches, such as its descriptive techniques or Cox proportional hazards models, this technique allows us to evaluate the predictive power of tests, as well as of interventions.
{"title":"El Análisis de Supervivencia como Técnica para la Evaluación de la Validez Predictiva en la Psicología Jurídica","authors":"Julio Isaac Vega-Cauich","doi":"10.5093/APJ2018A11","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5093/APJ2018A11","url":null,"abstract":"Being able to determine that an instrument predicts behavior such as violence or recidivism is one of the main objectives of legal psychology. Predictive validity, as it is known, allows evaluating this characteristic. This type of validity has been evaluated through various techniques, such as contingency , sensitivity, specificity, andROC curves. However, these techniques do not address a major statistical problem: data censorship that occurs in prospective studies, since in many cases the subjects will not relapse during the follow-up performed. Survival analysis is a technique that allows taking this information into consideration and modeling the time until a certain event happens. Through different approaches, such as its descriptive techniques or Cox proportional hazards models, this technique allows us to evaluate the predictive power of tests, as well as of interventions.","PeriodicalId":44109,"journal":{"name":"Anuario De Psicologia Juridica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2019-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42426704","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
A reflection on gender blindness in research and in the academy is proposed from the paper “Gender in the analysis of intimate partner violence against women: From gender ‘blindness’ to gender-specific research”. A t work of the whole society through alliances is suggested to modify and transcend inter-sectionally the gender blindness. It is necessary to transcend gender confrontation from the feminist movement, requiring deconstruction and redefinition of gender norms, including the redefinition of the subject of feminism. It is necessary to expand the fight against gender violence beyond violence against women by intimate partners, which, despite being one of the most significant sources of feminicide, does not exhaust violence or discrimination against women or girls on the mere fact they are women.
{"title":"Ceguera de Género, Feminismo y Academia en la Violencia de Género. Comentario a Ferrer-Pérez y Bosch-Fiol, 2019","authors":"Susana Barón","doi":"10.5093/APJ2019A7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5093/APJ2019A7","url":null,"abstract":"A reflection on gender blindness in research and in the academy is proposed from the paper “Gender in the analysis of intimate partner violence against women: From gender ‘blindness’ to gender-specific research”. A t work of the whole society through alliances is suggested to modify and transcend inter-sectionally the gender blindness. It is necessary to transcend gender confrontation from the feminist movement, requiring deconstruction and redefinition of gender norms, including the redefinition of the subject of feminism. It is necessary to expand the fight against gender violence beyond violence against women by intimate partners, which, despite being one of the most significant sources of feminicide, does not exhaust violence or discrimination against women or girls on the mere fact they are women.","PeriodicalId":44109,"journal":{"name":"Anuario De Psicologia Juridica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2019-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44771767","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Violence against women is now regarded as a gender-based violence and recognized as a violation of human rights and a serious social problem of epidemic proportions, both by different international organisms and by governments in a growing number of countries. According to this consideration, studies for the analysis and characterization of this violence should place gender as a central category of analysis (i.e., they should be gender-specific or, at least, gender-sensitive). However, despite this, not a few scientific texts and papers continue to be written from what has been termed gender blindness. This article reflects on the possible repercussions of this “blindness”, and on the need to start from a framework of interpretation that places gender at the centre of analysis and adequately dimensions this problem. For this, the most common form of violence against women is taken as an example, that is, the one that occurs in intimate partner relationships.
{"title":"El Género en el Análisis de la Violencia contra las Mujeres en la Pareja: de la “Ceguera” de Género a la Investigación Específica del Mismo","authors":"V. A. Ferrer-Perez, Esperanza Bosch-Fiol","doi":"10.5093/APJ2019A3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5093/APJ2019A3","url":null,"abstract":"Violence against women is now regarded as a gender-based violence and recognized as a violation of human rights and a serious social problem of epidemic proportions, both by different international organisms and by governments in a growing number of countries. According to this consideration, studies for the analysis and characterization of this violence should place gender as a central category of analysis (i.e., they should be gender-specific or, at least, gender-sensitive). However, despite this, not a few scientific texts and papers continue to be written from what has been termed gender blindness. This article reflects on the possible repercussions of this “blindness”, and on the need to start from a framework of interpretation that places gender at the centre of analysis and adequately dimensions this problem. For this, the most common form of violence against women is taken as an example, that is, the one that occurs in intimate partner relationships.","PeriodicalId":44109,"journal":{"name":"Anuario De Psicologia Juridica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2019-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42980176","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In Spain gender violence is poorly defined in Organic Law 1/2004, focused on comprehensive protection measures for women, because it only s intimate partner violence. Different forms of gender-based violence against women, such as rape, sexual harassment, mob violence, or trafficking in women, are excluded from this law. Gender violence depends on sexist behaviors, though not exclusively, because there is a set of non-specific violent attitudes and behaviors early learned in the family, at school, and in society that reinforce violence as an adequate coping strategy. Regarding assessment and treatment programs focused on male perpetrators of intimate partner violence, in Spain there are available assessment instruments that take into account cognitive distortions on women and violence aimed at designing multicomponent treatment programs.
{"title":"Sobre el Papel del Género en la Violencia de Pareja contra la Mujer. Comentario a Ferrer-Pérez y Bosch-Fiol, 2019","authors":"E. Echeburúa","doi":"10.5093/APJ2019A4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5093/APJ2019A4","url":null,"abstract":"In Spain gender violence is poorly defined in Organic Law 1/2004, focused on comprehensive protection measures for women, because it only s intimate partner violence. Different forms of gender-based violence against women, such as rape, sexual harassment, mob violence, or trafficking in women, are excluded from this law. Gender violence depends on sexist behaviors, though not exclusively, because there is a set of non-specific violent attitudes and behaviors early learned in the family, at school, and in society that reinforce violence as an adequate coping strategy. Regarding assessment and treatment programs focused on male perpetrators of intimate partner violence, in Spain there are available assessment instruments that take into account cognitive distortions on women and violence aimed at designing multicomponent treatment programs.","PeriodicalId":44109,"journal":{"name":"Anuario De Psicologia Juridica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2019-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47230325","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The authors answers the article in which empirical studies revealing that violence in relationships is a complex and multicausal phenomenon affecting both sexes are accused of gender blindness. A review is made of fallacies that underlie a discourse based on the suppression of all evidence against the prevailing ideology, citing only reports containing data of violence committed by men against women. The main problems that this distorted vision of reality entails for the implementation of programs for the prevention and treatment of violence are also addressed. As a consequence of this evidence blindness, there is a lack of resources to help and support male victims and women who use violence in their intimate relationships.
{"title":"¿Ciegos ante la Perspectiva de Género o Ciegos ante la Evidencia Empírica sobre la Violencia en las Relaciones de Pareja? Comentario a Ferrer-Pérez y Bosch-Fiol, 2019","authors":"N. Pereda, J. Tamarit","doi":"10.5093/APJ2019A6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5093/APJ2019A6","url":null,"abstract":"The authors answers the article in which empirical studies revealing that violence in relationships is a complex and multicausal phenomenon affecting both sexes are accused of gender blindness. A review is made of fallacies that underlie a discourse based on the suppression of all evidence against the prevailing ideology, citing only reports containing data of violence committed by men against women. The main problems that this distorted vision of reality entails for the implementation of programs for the prevention and treatment of violence are also addressed. As a consequence of this evidence blindness, there is a lack of resources to help and support male victims and women who use violence in their intimate relationships.","PeriodicalId":44109,"journal":{"name":"Anuario De Psicologia Juridica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2019-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43181640","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
A. L. Manzanero, M. T. Scott, Rocío Vallet, J. Aróztegui, R. Bull
The aims of the present study were to analyse people’s natural ability to discriminate between true and false statements provided by people with intellectual disability (IQTRUE = 62.00, SD = 10.07; IQFALSE = 58.41, SD = 8.42), and the differentiating characteristics of such people’s statements using criteria-based content analysis (CBCA). Thirty-three people assessed 16 true statements and 13 false statements using their normal abilities. Two other evaluators trained in CBCA evaluated the same statements. The natural evaluators differentiated between true and false statements with somewhat above-chance accuracy, even though error rate was high (38.19%). That lay participants could not effectively discriminate between false and true statements demonstrates that such assessments cannot be considered useful in a forensic context. The CBCA technique did discriminate at a better level than intuitive judgements. However, of the 19 criteria, only one significantly discriminated. More procedures specifically adapted to the abilities of people with intellectual disabilities are thus d. The presence of structured production, quantity of details, characteristics details and unexpected complications increased the probability that a statement would be considered true by non-expert evaluators. The classification made by the non-expert evaluators was independent of the participants’ IQ. A big data analysis is performed in search for better classification quality.
{"title":"Criteria-based Content Analysis in True and Simulated Victims with Intellectual Disability","authors":"A. L. Manzanero, M. T. Scott, Rocío Vallet, J. Aróztegui, R. Bull","doi":"10.5093/APJ2019A1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5093/APJ2019A1","url":null,"abstract":"The aims of the present study were to analyse people’s natural ability to discriminate between true and false statements provided by people with intellectual disability (IQTRUE = 62.00, SD = 10.07; IQFALSE = 58.41, SD = 8.42), and the differentiating characteristics of such people’s statements using criteria-based content analysis (CBCA). Thirty-three people assessed 16 true statements and 13 false statements using their normal abilities. Two other evaluators trained in CBCA evaluated the same statements. The natural evaluators differentiated between true and false statements with somewhat above-chance accuracy, even though error rate was high (38.19%). That lay participants could not effectively discriminate between false and true statements demonstrates that such assessments cannot be considered useful in a forensic context. The CBCA technique did discriminate at a better level than intuitive judgements. However, of the 19 criteria, only one significantly discriminated. More procedures specifically adapted to the abilities of people with intellectual disabilities are thus d. The presence of structured production, quantity of details, characteristics details and unexpected complications increased the probability that a statement would be considered true by non-expert evaluators. The classification made by the non-expert evaluators was independent of the participants’ IQ. A big data analysis is performed in search for better classification quality.","PeriodicalId":44109,"journal":{"name":"Anuario De Psicologia Juridica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"70894467","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：