Pub Date : 2021-01-01DOI: 10.23923/j.rips.2022.01.054
Joaquín Villaécija, Bárbara Luque, Sandra Martínez, R. Castillo-Mayén, Esther, Cuadrado, Marta Domínguez-Escribano, C. Tabernero
Background: Unhealthy eating habits in children and adolescents and low personal judgment of efficacy in maintaining healthy eating behaviors have negative repercussions for health. These negative effects can have a differential affectation associated with psychosocial factors. Objectives/Method: The objectives were: to validate the Weight Efficacy Lifestyle (WEL) Questionnaire for Spanish children and adolescents; to analyze the relationship between well-being, socioeconomic level, body mass index, age, academic distress, social support for healthy and unhealthy eating, and self-efficacy; and to develop an explanatory model of well-being in children and adolescents based on their eating behaviors and other psychosocial behaviors. Results: Data were obtained from 299 children and adolescents (58.5% girls) aged from 9 to 18 years old (Mage = 12.92 years, SD = 2.74). Preliminary analysis showed adequate psychometric properties and results showed that perceived well-being was associated with lower academic distress and parent and peer social support for unhealthy eating, and with a better eating self-efficacy, parent support for healthy eating, and general weight management self-efficacy. Conclusions: Therefore, fostering confidence in children and adolescents about their weight management selfefficacy judgments may influence well-being, reduce body mass index, and prevent overweight and obesity.
{"title":"Perceived social support and healthy eating self-efficacy\u0000on the well-being of children and adolescents","authors":"Joaquín Villaécija, Bárbara Luque, Sandra Martínez, R. Castillo-Mayén, Esther, Cuadrado, Marta Domínguez-Escribano, C. Tabernero","doi":"10.23923/j.rips.2022.01.054","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23923/j.rips.2022.01.054","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Unhealthy eating habits in children and adolescents and low personal judgment of efficacy in maintaining healthy eating behaviors have negative repercussions for health. These negative effects can have a differential affectation associated with psychosocial factors. Objectives/Method: The objectives were: to validate the Weight Efficacy Lifestyle (WEL) Questionnaire for Spanish children and adolescents; to analyze the relationship between well-being, socioeconomic level, body mass index, age, academic distress, social support for healthy and unhealthy eating, and self-efficacy; and to develop an explanatory model of well-being in children and adolescents based on their eating behaviors and other psychosocial behaviors. Results: Data were obtained from 299 children and adolescents (58.5% girls) aged from 9 to 18 years old (Mage = 12.92 years, SD = 2.74). Preliminary analysis showed adequate psychometric properties and results showed that perceived well-being was associated with lower academic distress and parent and peer social support for unhealthy eating, and with a better eating self-efficacy, parent support for healthy eating, and general weight management self-efficacy. Conclusions: Therefore, fostering confidence in children and adolescents about their weight management selfefficacy judgments may influence well-being, reduce body mass index, and prevent overweight and obesity.","PeriodicalId":44413,"journal":{"name":"Revista Iberoamericana de Psicologia y Salud","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68738933","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-01-01DOI: 10.23923/j.rips.2021.01.045
{"title":"COVID-19: Impacto Psicológico, Factores de Riesgo e\u0000Intervenciones Psicológicas en el Personal Sanitario. Una\u0000Revisión Sistemática.","authors":"","doi":"10.23923/j.rips.2021.01.045","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23923/j.rips.2021.01.045","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44413,"journal":{"name":"Revista Iberoamericana de Psicologia y Salud","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68739188","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-01-01DOI: 10.23923/j.rips.2021.01.043
{"title":"Reading span test in subjects with speech, language and\u0000communication needs (SLCN)","authors":"","doi":"10.23923/j.rips.2021.01.043","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23923/j.rips.2021.01.043","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44413,"journal":{"name":"Revista Iberoamericana de Psicologia y Salud","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68738977","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-01-01DOI: 10.23923/j.rips.2022.01.053
{"title":"The role of text characteristics in the reading comprehension\u0000of primary school children in Spanish","authors":"","doi":"10.23923/j.rips.2022.01.053","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23923/j.rips.2022.01.053","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44413,"journal":{"name":"Revista Iberoamericana de Psicologia y Salud","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68738880","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-01-01DOI: 10.23923/j.rips.2021.01.049
{"title":"Memory of visual paired associates in healthy aging. A\u0000transcultural study","authors":"","doi":"10.23923/j.rips.2021.01.049","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23923/j.rips.2021.01.049","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44413,"journal":{"name":"Revista Iberoamericana de Psicologia y Salud","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68739259","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-01-01DOI: 10.23923/j.rips.2021.01.041
{"title":"Esquemas Tradicionales de Roles Sexuales de Género,\u0000Poder en las Relaciones y Violencia en el Noviazgo","authors":"","doi":"10.23923/j.rips.2021.01.041","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23923/j.rips.2021.01.041","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44413,"journal":{"name":"Revista Iberoamericana de Psicologia y Salud","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68738709","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-01-01DOI: 10.23923/J.RIPS.2021.02.045
M. D. Tolsá, O. Malas
espanolEn relacion a la mala salud mental del personal sanitario debido a la pandemia por COVID-19, la presente revision sistematica tiene como objetivo sintetizar el conocimiento generado entre noviembre-2019 y septiembre-2020 sobre impacto psicologico, factores de riesgo e intervenciones psicologicas llevadas a cabo en esta poblacion. Siguiendo metodologia PRISMA se recuperaron 49 articulos que cumplieron con todos los criterios de inclusion y calidad exigidos, y que revelaron prevalencias del 5,2% al 79% para estres, del 6,78% al 71% para los trastornos del sueno, del 4,98% al 50% para ansiedad, del 8,9% al 50,70% para depresion y del 4,4% al 19,10% para estres postraumatico. Las mayores prevalencias dependen de factores relacionados con situaciones de mayor riesgo (primeras fases de la pandemia, primera linea, escasez de recursos de proteccion personal y falta de apoyo social) y con la pertenencia a grupos poblacionales mas susceptibles (mujeres, personal sanitario de apoyo, con poca formacion sobre la COVID-19, de nivel socioeconomico bajo y/o vida sedentaria, entre otros). Prevalecen las intervenciones basadas en estrategias de intervencion temprana, de resolucion de problemas inmediatos y terapias cognitivo-conductual para incrementar las conductas adaptativas, mejorar las habilidades de afrontamiento al estres y establecer sistemas de apoyo social. EnglishRelating to poor mental health of healthcare workers due to COVID-19 pandemic, the present systematic review aims to synthesize the knowledge generated between November-2019 and September-2020 about psychological impact, risk factors and psychological interventions carried out on this population. Following PRISMA methodology, we retrieved 49 titles, which fulfilled all inclusion and quality criteria; and that revealed prevalences ranging from 5.2% to 79% for stress, from 6.78% to 71% for sleep disturbances, from 4.98% to 50% for anxiety, from 8.9% to 50.70% for depression and from 4.4% to 19.10% for post-traumatic stress disorder. Higher prevalences were dependent on experiencing situations of increased risk (early stages of the pandemic, working on the front line, the scarcity of personal protection resources or the lack of social support) and the membership to susceptible population groups (being a woman, working as a health support staff, have little training on COVID-19, being of low socioeconomic status and/or have a sedentary lifestyle among others). Prevail the interventions based on early intervention strategies, for solving immediate problems, and cognitivebehavioral therapy in order to increase adaptive behaviors, greater coping skills to stress, and establish social support systems.
本系统综述旨在综合2019年11月至2020年9月期间产生的关于这一人群的心理影响、风险因素和心理干预的知识。按照PRISMA metodologia痊愈49第达到所有要求的包容和质量标准,并透露因过度劳累5.2%至79%、6,78% 71%为4,98% 50%的睡眠失调、焦虑、8.9%至50,70%为“和4.4% 19,10%过度劳累postraumatico。因依赖有关因素增加,风险较大的情况(第线,这种大流行病的早期阶段资源保护人员短缺和缺乏社会支助)易受影响的群体更多的归属感(妇女,卫生人力支持,在短暂的编队飞行socioeconomico《COVID-19低水平和/或生活方式,等等)。基于早期干预策略、即时问题解决和认知行为疗法的干预占主导地位，以增加适应性行为、提高应对压力的技能和建立社会支持系统。关于COVID-19大流行导致医疗保健工作者精神健康不良的问题，本系统综述旨在综合2019年11月至2020年9月期间产生的关于这一人群的心理影响、风险因素和心理干预措施的知识。按照PRISMA方法，我们检索了49个标题，满足了所有的包容性和质量标准;压力的患病率为5.2%至79%，睡眠障碍的患病率为6.78%至71%，焦虑的患病率为4.98%至50%，抑郁的患病率为8.9%至50.70%，创伤后应激障碍的患病率为4.4%至19.10%。高等prevalences是dependent on国家优惠待遇增加了风险(early stages of the virus, working on the front line, the scarcity人员保护资源或缺乏社会支持的)and the membership to敏感人口群体(being a woman, working as a health support staff,向小training on COVID-19 being of low性status and / or have a sedentary生活方式之间其他人)。采用基于早期干预策略的干预措施，以立即解决问题和认知行为疗法，以增强适应性行为，增强应对压力的技能，并建立社会支持系统。
{"title":"COVID-19: Impacto Psicológico, Factores de Riesgo e Intervenciones Psicológicas en el Personal Sanitario. Una Revisión Sistemática","authors":"M. D. Tolsá, O. Malas","doi":"10.23923/J.RIPS.2021.02.045","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23923/J.RIPS.2021.02.045","url":null,"abstract":"espanolEn relacion a la mala salud mental del personal sanitario debido a la pandemia por COVID-19, la presente revision sistematica tiene como objetivo sintetizar el conocimiento generado entre noviembre-2019 y septiembre-2020 sobre impacto psicologico, factores de riesgo e intervenciones psicologicas llevadas a cabo en esta poblacion. Siguiendo metodologia PRISMA se recuperaron 49 articulos que cumplieron con todos los criterios de inclusion y calidad exigidos, y que revelaron prevalencias del 5,2% al 79% para estres, del 6,78% al 71% para los trastornos del sueno, del 4,98% al 50% para ansiedad, del 8,9% al 50,70% para depresion y del 4,4% al 19,10% para estres postraumatico. Las mayores prevalencias dependen de factores relacionados con situaciones de mayor riesgo (primeras fases de la pandemia, primera linea, escasez de recursos de proteccion personal y falta de apoyo social) y con la pertenencia a grupos poblacionales mas susceptibles (mujeres, personal sanitario de apoyo, con poca formacion sobre la COVID-19, de nivel socioeconomico bajo y/o vida sedentaria, entre otros). Prevalecen las intervenciones basadas en estrategias de intervencion temprana, de resolucion de problemas inmediatos y terapias cognitivo-conductual para incrementar las conductas adaptativas, mejorar las habilidades de afrontamiento al estres y establecer sistemas de apoyo social. EnglishRelating to poor mental health of healthcare workers due to COVID-19 pandemic, the present systematic review aims to synthesize the knowledge generated between November-2019 and September-2020 about psychological impact, risk factors and psychological interventions carried out on this population. Following PRISMA methodology, we retrieved 49 titles, which fulfilled all inclusion and quality criteria; and that revealed prevalences ranging from 5.2% to 79% for stress, from 6.78% to 71% for sleep disturbances, from 4.98% to 50% for anxiety, from 8.9% to 50.70% for depression and from 4.4% to 19.10% for post-traumatic stress disorder. Higher prevalences were dependent on experiencing situations of increased risk (early stages of the pandemic, working on the front line, the scarcity of personal protection resources or the lack of social support) and the membership to susceptible population groups (being a woman, working as a health support staff, have little training on COVID-19, being of low socioeconomic status and/or have a sedentary lifestyle among others). Prevail the interventions based on early intervention strategies, for solving immediate problems, and cognitivebehavioral therapy in order to increase adaptive behaviors, greater coping skills to stress, and establish social support systems.","PeriodicalId":44413,"journal":{"name":"Revista Iberoamericana de Psicologia y Salud","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68739277","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-06-10DOI: 10.23923/j.rips.2020.02.039
Pablo Prieto Macías, A. Riquelme, Raúl Quevedo Blasco
espanolLa Historical-Clinical-Risk Management-20 (HCR-20) es un instrumento ampliamente usado para la evaluacion del riesgo de violencia en muestra general y penitenciaria. Algunos estudios han demostrado una buena consistencia interna en muestra penitenciaria, pero no existe un meta-analisis que proporcione una vision global de todos estos resultados. El presente meta-analisis tiene el objetivo examinar los alfas medios de este instrumento en instituciones penitenciarias y analizar el efecto de los moderadores en la fiabilidad. Los datos fueron recogidos a traves de las bases datos de Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest, Psicodoc y Cochrane. Se incluyeron 25 estudios que examinaban la consistencia interna en esta herramienta, reuniendo un total de 2.517 participantes de diferentes paises con una media de edad de 29,7 anos. Se demostro que el HCR-20 posee una optima consistencia interna, influenciada por diversos moderadores. La principal conclusion de este meta-analisis es, por tanto, que el HCR-20 es un instrumento fiable para este tipo de muestra. Esta informacion es importante por la repercusion que tiene este instrumento en numerosas decisiones trascendentales. EnglishThe Historical-Clinical-Risk Management-20 (HCR-20) is a widely used instrument for assessing risk of violence in civil and correctional sample. Previous studies have demonstrated good reliability in correctional sample, but it does not exist a meta-analysis that provides an overview vision for all these results. This meta-analysis has the aim to examine the average alphas of this instrument in prison and analyze the effect of moderators on reliability. Data were collected through formal and informal sources. Twenty five studies, that examined the internal consistency of this tool, were included, collecting a total of 2,517 participants from different countries with an average age of 29.7 years. It was demonstrated that HCR-20 has an optimal internal consistency, influenced by various moderators. The main conclusion of this meta-analysis is, therefore, that HCR-20 is a reliable instrument for this type of sample. This information is important because of the impact that this instrument has on numerous transcendental decisions
{"title":"Generalización de la consistencia interna del Historical-\u0000Clinical-Risk Management-20 (HCR-20) en población\u0000penitenciaria: Un meta-análisis","authors":"Pablo Prieto Macías, A. Riquelme, Raúl Quevedo Blasco","doi":"10.23923/j.rips.2020.02.039","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23923/j.rips.2020.02.039","url":null,"abstract":"espanolLa Historical-Clinical-Risk Management-20 (HCR-20) es un instrumento ampliamente usado para la evaluacion del riesgo de violencia en muestra general y penitenciaria. Algunos estudios han demostrado una buena consistencia interna en muestra penitenciaria, pero no existe un meta-analisis que proporcione una vision global de todos estos resultados. El presente meta-analisis tiene el objetivo examinar los alfas medios de este instrumento en instituciones penitenciarias y analizar el efecto de los moderadores en la fiabilidad. Los datos fueron recogidos a traves de las bases datos de Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest, Psicodoc y Cochrane. Se incluyeron 25 estudios que examinaban la consistencia interna en esta herramienta, reuniendo un total de 2.517 participantes de diferentes paises con una media de edad de 29,7 anos. Se demostro que el HCR-20 posee una optima consistencia interna, influenciada por diversos moderadores. La principal conclusion de este meta-analisis es, por tanto, que el HCR-20 es un instrumento fiable para este tipo de muestra. Esta informacion es importante por la repercusion que tiene este instrumento en numerosas decisiones trascendentales. EnglishThe Historical-Clinical-Risk Management-20 (HCR-20) is a widely used instrument for assessing risk of violence in civil and correctional sample. Previous studies have demonstrated good reliability in correctional sample, but it does not exist a meta-analysis that provides an overview vision for all these results. This meta-analysis has the aim to examine the average alphas of this instrument in prison and analyze the effect of moderators on reliability. Data were collected through formal and informal sources. Twenty five studies, that examined the internal consistency of this tool, were included, collecting a total of 2,517 participants from different countries with an average age of 29.7 years. It was demonstrated that HCR-20 has an optimal internal consistency, influenced by various moderators. The main conclusion of this meta-analysis is, therefore, that HCR-20 is a reliable instrument for this type of sample. This information is important because of the impact that this instrument has on numerous transcendental decisions","PeriodicalId":44413,"journal":{"name":"Revista Iberoamericana de Psicologia y Salud","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2020-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48470889","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-05-28DOI: 10.23923/j.rips.2020.02.038
Ana Álvarez Muelas, C. Berrocal, Juan Carlos Sierra Freire
espanolEl doble estandar sexual (DES) hace referencia a la aceptacion de diferentes criterios para la valoracion del mismo comportamiento sexual en hombres y en mujeres. Ante la ausencia de revisiones bibliograficas previas, este trabajo presenta una revision sistematica sobre la relacion del DES con el funcionamiento sexual y las conductas sexuales de rie sgo. A partir de la busqueda en diferentes bases de datos, se obtuvieron 22 articulos cientificos. Los resultados senalan que la actitud a favor del DES perjudica el funcionamiento sexual y favorece las conductas sexuales de riesgo, las cuales son mas perjudiciales para las mujeres. Se discute la importancia que tiene el estudio del DES en la salud sexual, para entender el funcionamiento sexual y la incidencia de las conductas sexuales de riesgo. Se recomienda mejorar los instrumentos para medir DES, con el fin de garantizar una evaluacion exacta e invariante de este fenomeno en aquellos grupos definidos por el genero y otras variables socioculturales. EnglishSexual double standard (SDS) refers to the acceptance of different criteria for the assessment of the same sexual behavior in men and women. Due to the absence of previous bibliographical reviews, this study presents a systematic review of the relationship between SDS, sexual functioning, and risk sexual behaviors. From a search of different databases, it was obtained a total of 22 scientific articles. The results indicate that attitude in favor of SDS harms sexual functioning and favors risk sexual behaviors, which were more harmful to women. The importance of the study of SDS in sexual health is discussed, to understand sexual functioning and the incidence of risk sexual behaviors. It is recommended to improve the instruments used to measure SDS, to guarantee an exact and invariant evaluation of this phenomenon in those groups defined by gender and other socio-cultural variables.
{"title":"Relación del doble estándar sexual con el funcionamiento\u0000sexual y las conductas sexuales de riesgo: revisión\u0000sistemática","authors":"Ana Álvarez Muelas, C. Berrocal, Juan Carlos Sierra Freire","doi":"10.23923/j.rips.2020.02.038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23923/j.rips.2020.02.038","url":null,"abstract":"espanolEl doble estandar sexual (DES) hace referencia a la aceptacion de diferentes criterios para la valoracion del mismo comportamiento sexual en hombres y en mujeres. Ante la ausencia de revisiones bibliograficas previas, este trabajo presenta una revision sistematica sobre la relacion del DES con el funcionamiento sexual y las conductas sexuales de rie sgo. A partir de la busqueda en diferentes bases de datos, se obtuvieron 22 articulos cientificos. Los resultados senalan que la actitud a favor del DES perjudica el funcionamiento sexual y favorece las conductas sexuales de riesgo, las cuales son mas perjudiciales para las mujeres. Se discute la importancia que tiene el estudio del DES en la salud sexual, para entender el funcionamiento sexual y la incidencia de las conductas sexuales de riesgo. Se recomienda mejorar los instrumentos para medir DES, con el fin de garantizar una evaluacion exacta e invariante de este fenomeno en aquellos grupos definidos por el genero y otras variables socioculturales. EnglishSexual double standard (SDS) refers to the acceptance of different criteria for the assessment of the same sexual behavior in men and women. Due to the absence of previous bibliographical reviews, this study presents a systematic review of the relationship between SDS, sexual functioning, and risk sexual behaviors. From a search of different databases, it was obtained a total of 22 scientific articles. The results indicate that attitude in favor of SDS harms sexual functioning and favors risk sexual behaviors, which were more harmful to women. The importance of the study of SDS in sexual health is discussed, to understand sexual functioning and the incidence of risk sexual behaviors. It is recommended to improve the instruments used to measure SDS, to guarantee an exact and invariant evaluation of this phenomenon in those groups defined by gender and other socio-cultural variables.","PeriodicalId":44413,"journal":{"name":"Revista Iberoamericana de Psicologia y Salud","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2020-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45880018","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-01-01DOI: 10.23923/j.rips.2020.02.036
Francisco González-Sala, Víctor Ciudad-Fernández, Julia Haba-Osca, Julia Osca-Lluch
{"title":"Efectos del consumo dual cannabis-tabaco sobre el\u0000embarazo y la descendencia: una revisión sistemática","authors":"Francisco González-Sala, Víctor Ciudad-Fernández, Julia Haba-Osca, Julia Osca-Lluch","doi":"10.23923/j.rips.2020.02.036","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23923/j.rips.2020.02.036","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44413,"journal":{"name":"Revista Iberoamericana de Psicologia y Salud","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68738338","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：