Pub Date : 2021-06-29DOI: 10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.57.1.05
Sergio Armando, Gallegos-Ordorica
Abstract:Following the line of thought articulated by Gallegos-Ordorica (2019), the main goal of this article is to argue that the 19th century Venezuelan-Chilean polymath Andrés Bello should be included within the history of the pragmatist tradition as an important precursor insofar as his masterpiece, Filosofía del Entendimiento (Philosophy of the Understanding), exhibits many views and attitudes that are characteristic of pragmatism. A second and narrower goal of this article is to show that the specific kind of proto-pragmatist position that Bello endorses in Philosophy of the Understanding bears remarkable similarities to the neo-pragmatist view of Huw Price and to argue that Bello’s metaphorical idea-signs can be potentially useful in explaining the great variety of functions that what Price calls “i-representations” have within his functional pluralism.
摘要:按照Gallegos-Ordorica(2019)所阐述的思路，本文的主要目标是论证19世纪委内瑞拉-智利博学家andr·贝洛(andrs Bello)应该作为一个重要的先驱被纳入实用主义传统的历史，因为他的杰作Filosofía del Entendimiento(知性哲学)展示了许多实用主义特征的观点和态度。本文的第二个和更狭窄的目标是表明贝罗在《知性哲学》中所支持的特定类型的原始实用主义立场与休·普赖斯的新实用主义观点有着显著的相似之处，并论证贝罗的隐喻性观念符号可以潜在地用于解释普赖斯所谓的“我表征”在他的功能多元主义中具有的各种各样的功能。
{"title":"I-Representations as Mental Currency: Reading Huw Price through Andrés Bello","authors":"Sergio Armando, Gallegos-Ordorica","doi":"10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.57.1.05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.57.1.05","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Following the line of thought articulated by Gallegos-Ordorica (2019), the main goal of this article is to argue that the 19th century Venezuelan-Chilean polymath Andrés Bello should be included within the history of the pragmatist tradition as an important precursor insofar as his masterpiece, Filosofía del Entendimiento (Philosophy of the Understanding), exhibits many views and attitudes that are characteristic of pragmatism. A second and narrower goal of this article is to show that the specific kind of proto-pragmatist position that Bello endorses in Philosophy of the Understanding bears remarkable similarities to the neo-pragmatist view of Huw Price and to argue that Bello’s metaphorical idea-signs can be potentially useful in explaining the great variety of functions that what Price calls “i-representations” have within his functional pluralism.","PeriodicalId":45325,"journal":{"name":"TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHARLES S PEIRCE SOCIETY","volume":"1 1","pages":"113 - 89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2021-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89789013","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-06-01DOI: 10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.57.1.08
G. Pappas
{"title":"AMERICAN PHILOSOPHY: FROM WOUNDED KNEE TO THE PRESENT, ERIN MCKENNA AND SCOTT L. PRATT","authors":"G. Pappas","doi":"10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.57.1.08","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.57.1.08","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45325,"journal":{"name":"TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHARLES S PEIRCE SOCIETY","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43479728","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-06-01DOI: 10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.57.1.06
F. Stjernfelt
{"title":"LOGIC OF THE FUTURE: WRITINGS ON EXISTENTIAL GRAPHS. VOLUME 1: HISTORY AND APPLICATIONS, EDITED BY AHTI PIETARINEN","authors":"F. Stjernfelt","doi":"10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.57.1.06","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.57.1.06","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45325,"journal":{"name":"TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHARLES S PEIRCE SOCIETY","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48359156","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-04-14DOI: 10.2979/TRANCHARPEIRSOC.56.4.05
Dorstewitz
Abstract:This article surveys functional features of human imagination from a pragmatist perspective. It proposes a taxonomy that traces facets of imaginative functioning and posits these at the center, not the periphery of human intelligence. The article understands human deliberative intelligence as a creative and situated process of transactions which involve not only the entire spectrum of human psychological capacities but also meaningful interactions with others within an environment. The concept of “imagination” will be explored in its projective, affective, aesthetic, motoric and dramatic provinces.
{"title":"Provinces of Imaginative Intelligence: A Taxonomy","authors":"Dorstewitz","doi":"10.2979/TRANCHARPEIRSOC.56.4.05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2979/TRANCHARPEIRSOC.56.4.05","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article surveys functional features of human imagination from a pragmatist perspective. It proposes a taxonomy that traces facets of imaginative functioning and posits these at the center, not the periphery of human intelligence. The article understands human deliberative intelligence as a creative and situated process of transactions which involve not only the entire spectrum of human psychological capacities but also meaningful interactions with others within an environment. The concept of “imagination” will be explored in its projective, affective, aesthetic, motoric and dramatic provinces.","PeriodicalId":45325,"journal":{"name":"TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHARLES S PEIRCE SOCIETY","volume":"35 1","pages":"600 - 619"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2021-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88545374","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-04-14DOI: 10.2979/TRANCHARPEIRSOC.56.4.04
J. Schmidt
Abstract:Peirce is best known as the founder of pragmatism, but his dissatisfaction with how others understood and appropriated it prompted him to rename his own doctrine “pragmaticism” and to compose several variants of his original maxim defining it, as well as numerous restatements and elaborations. This paper presents an extensive selection of such formulations, followed by analysis and commentary demonstrating that for Peirce the ultimate meaning of an intellectual concept is properly expressed as a conditional proposition about the deliberate, self-controlled conduct of its interpreters, not the law-governed behavior of its object.
{"title":"Peirce’s Maxim of Pragmatism: 61 Formulations","authors":"J. Schmidt","doi":"10.2979/TRANCHARPEIRSOC.56.4.04","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2979/TRANCHARPEIRSOC.56.4.04","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Peirce is best known as the founder of pragmatism, but his dissatisfaction with how others understood and appropriated it prompted him to rename his own doctrine “pragmaticism” and to compose several variants of his original maxim defining it, as well as numerous restatements and elaborations. This paper presents an extensive selection of such formulations, followed by analysis and commentary demonstrating that for Peirce the ultimate meaning of an intellectual concept is properly expressed as a conditional proposition about the deliberate, self-controlled conduct of its interpreters, not the law-governed behavior of its object.","PeriodicalId":45325,"journal":{"name":"TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHARLES S PEIRCE SOCIETY","volume":"14 1","pages":"580 - 599"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2021-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87705599","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-04-14DOI: 10.2979/TRANCHARPEIRSOC.56.4.01
A. Topa
Abstract:According to Charles Peirce, “thinking always proceeds in the form of a dialogue —a dialogue between different phases of the ego—so that, being dialogical, it is essentially composed of signs, as its matter, in the sense in which a game of chess has the chessmen for its matter” (CP 4.6, 1906). As this insight seems to imply that thought processes are essentially semeiotic, because they are dialogical, it is the dialogical form of thought that grounds and necessitates its semeioticity. The truth of the ‘dialogicality thesis’ for Peirce “is not merely a fact of human Psychology” but rather reflects “a necessity of Logic, that every logical evolution of thought should be dialogic” (CP 4.551, 1906). But is all thought really dialogic? And what is the set of formal properties belonging to logically evolving thought that Peirce here designates with the term ‘dialogic’? What does “the form of a dialogue” in which all thinking proceeds actually consist in? And what kind of truth is expressed by the dialogicality thesis, if it is not a psychological one? We contribute to answering these questions by distinguishing two ways in which dialogic form is thematized in Peirce’s writings. Dialogicality is, on the one hand, a rhetorical principle of composition operative in his writings. As such, it thematizes dialogicality performatively. On the other hand, dialogic form is also the object of his writings. As an object of philosophical inquiry, dialogic form fascinates Peirce from the very inception of his development in the late 1850s and takes center stage in the development of quantification-theory in the 1880s; however, he did not use the term ‘dialogical form’ before 1904, so that it is only in the last decade of his life that he provides a coenoscopic analysis of the components and normative dimensions of the dialogic form of thought.
{"title":"Charles S. Peirce on Dialogic Form","authors":"A. Topa","doi":"10.2979/TRANCHARPEIRSOC.56.4.01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2979/TRANCHARPEIRSOC.56.4.01","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:According to Charles Peirce, “thinking always proceeds in the form of a dialogue —a dialogue between different phases of the ego—so that, being dialogical, it is essentially composed of signs, as its matter, in the sense in which a game of chess has the chessmen for its matter” (CP 4.6, 1906). As this insight seems to imply that thought processes are essentially semeiotic, because they are dialogical, it is the dialogical form of thought that grounds and necessitates its semeioticity. The truth of the ‘dialogicality thesis’ for Peirce “is not merely a fact of human Psychology” but rather reflects “a necessity of Logic, that every logical evolution of thought should be dialogic” (CP 4.551, 1906). But is all thought really dialogic? And what is the set of formal properties belonging to logically evolving thought that Peirce here designates with the term ‘dialogic’? What does “the form of a dialogue” in which all thinking proceeds actually consist in? And what kind of truth is expressed by the dialogicality thesis, if it is not a psychological one? We contribute to answering these questions by distinguishing two ways in which dialogic form is thematized in Peirce’s writings. Dialogicality is, on the one hand, a rhetorical principle of composition operative in his writings. As such, it thematizes dialogicality performatively. On the other hand, dialogic form is also the object of his writings. As an object of philosophical inquiry, dialogic form fascinates Peirce from the very inception of his development in the late 1850s and takes center stage in the development of quantification-theory in the 1880s; however, he did not use the term ‘dialogical form’ before 1904, so that it is only in the last decade of his life that he provides a coenoscopic analysis of the components and normative dimensions of the dialogic form of thought.","PeriodicalId":45325,"journal":{"name":"TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHARLES S PEIRCE SOCIETY","volume":"80 1","pages":"475 - 520"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2021-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72963068","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-04-14DOI: 10.2979/TRANCHARPEIRSOC.56.4.03
Nate Whelan-Jackson
Abstract:Jane Addams analyzes recreation, and particularly sports, as a domain in which people are “revealed” to one another, affording sympathetic knowledge of the other. This function is integral to a democratic way of life; thus, she maintains that cities have an obligation to provide recreational opportunity. Some disability theorists challenge whether athletics can serve this revelatory function in contexts of disability, since esteem for an athletic performance supposedly takes place against a backdrop of “normal” functioning. On this view, disabled people might be subjects of “social inclusion,” the recognition of someone as an abstract bearer of rights, but not “community inclusion,” recognized as a subject of love or esteem by virtue of some contribution to a publicly acknowledged good. In this article I contend that Addams’s comments on confronting disability’s isolating barriers in the context of education disclose the malleability of this background and afford an avenue for understanding the potential for athletics to serve as a locus of community inclusion for disabled people.
{"title":"Disability and the Playing Field: Jane Addams, Sports, and the Possibility of Inclusion","authors":"Nate Whelan-Jackson","doi":"10.2979/TRANCHARPEIRSOC.56.4.03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2979/TRANCHARPEIRSOC.56.4.03","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Jane Addams analyzes recreation, and particularly sports, as a domain in which people are “revealed” to one another, affording sympathetic knowledge of the other. This function is integral to a democratic way of life; thus, she maintains that cities have an obligation to provide recreational opportunity. Some disability theorists challenge whether athletics can serve this revelatory function in contexts of disability, since esteem for an athletic performance supposedly takes place against a backdrop of “normal” functioning. On this view, disabled people might be subjects of “social inclusion,” the recognition of someone as an abstract bearer of rights, but not “community inclusion,” recognized as a subject of love or esteem by virtue of some contribution to a publicly acknowledged good. In this article I contend that Addams’s comments on confronting disability’s isolating barriers in the context of education disclose the malleability of this background and afford an avenue for understanding the potential for athletics to serve as a locus of community inclusion for disabled people.","PeriodicalId":45325,"journal":{"name":"TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHARLES S PEIRCE SOCIETY","volume":"95 1","pages":"558 - 579"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2021-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90441552","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-04-01DOI: 10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.56.4.06
Ulf Zackariasson
{"title":"Pragmatic Realism, Religious Truth, and Antitheodicy: On Viewing the World by Acknowledging the Other by Sami Pihlström (review)","authors":"Ulf Zackariasson","doi":"10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.56.4.06","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.56.4.06","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45325,"journal":{"name":"TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHARLES S PEIRCE SOCIETY","volume":"39 1","pages":"620 - 624"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91367407","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-04-01DOI: 10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.56.4.07
J. Stuhr
{"title":"PRAGMATIST AND AMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL PERSPECTIVES ON RESILIENCE, EDITED BY KELLY A. PARKER AND HEATHER E. KEITH","authors":"J. Stuhr","doi":"10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.56.4.07","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.56.4.07","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45325,"journal":{"name":"TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHARLES S PEIRCE SOCIETY","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47998807","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-04-01DOI: 10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.56.4.08
Fernando Zalamea
{"title":"Creativity Between Experience and Cosmos: C.S. Peirce and A.N. Whitehead on Novelty by Maria Regina Brioschi (review)","authors":"Fernando Zalamea","doi":"10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.56.4.08","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.56.4.08","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45325,"journal":{"name":"TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHARLES S PEIRCE SOCIETY","volume":"21 1","pages":"631 - 634"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84430693","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：