首页 > 最新文献

MODERN LANGUAGE REVIEW最新文献

英文 中文
The Turning Point: A Year that Changed Dickens and the World by Robert Douglas-Fairhurst (review) 《转折点:改变狄更斯和世界的一年》作者:罗伯特·道格拉斯-菲尔赫斯特(书评)
4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.1353/mlr.2023.a907858
Reviewed by: The Turning Point: A Year that Changed Dickens and the World by Robert Douglas-Fairhurst John Batchelor The Turning Point: A Year that Changed Dickens and the World. By Robert Douglas-Fairhurst. London: Cape. 2021. 355 pp. £25. ISBN 978–1–78733–070–2. This is an extraordinarily clever book. For a reader who is completely new to Dickens, the whole story of his relationship with his age is set out in a full and comprehensible form. David Copperfield is a mirror of Charles Dickens. The 'CD' of Dickens's initials are a reversal of David's initials. His history is the history of the whole of Victorian society taking 1850 as its midpoint. 1850 was a triumphal central year in Victorian culture, the year of Dickens's 'story of my own life', of Tennyson's great autobiographical elegy 'In Memoriam', and also of the first publication of Wordsworth's masterpiece, The Prelude. The 'turning point' of this book's title also is a physical structure, the Great Exhibition in the Crystal Palace, opened 1 May 1851, which for this study embodies the material success of the British Empire at its most affluent and resplendent. By 1851, this little island, with its industries, [End Page 614] its navies, and its command of much of the underdeveloped world, was arguably the most powerful civilization that the world had ever seen. Dickens was at the heart of it. Dickens's personal life story had been one of steady social advancement, and the British class system provided the spine of many of his plots. Pip in Great Expectations lives the dream of many a young, ambitious, and socially disadvantaged man of the period. At the same time, his story shows, shockingly, that sudden and unexpected access to great wealth can be a disastrous social evil. The plotting of this novel, with its elaborate network of hidden relationships, displays another of Dickens's leading preoccupations. Hidden relationships form a network which sustains the plot of several of Dickens's masterpieces, and this is particularly true of Bleak House, Great Expectations, and Our Mutual Friend. In his writing life, Dickens was both harnessing the energies of the previous century that drove the Bildungsroman, the novel of initiation and development as practised by Fielding, and following the bigger and broader traditions of narrative which drove Don Quixote. The novels which centre on the life of a single figure, David Copperfield and Great Expectations, are themselves phenomenal ragbags of narrative, packed with incidents all of which are part of a significant pattern. Bleak House does more than that, and this book shows that its tumult of incident disappointed and mystified some of its first readers. The fog which dominates some of the early narrative is presented in a sequence of verbal fragments which refuse to form discrete sentences. Robert Douglas-Fairhurst unpicks Dickens's prose here and in so doing demonstrates that a new kind of narrative writing has been evolved. He throws in the fasci
《转折点:改变狄更斯与世界的一年》作者:罗伯特·道格拉斯-菲尔赫斯特·约翰·巴彻勒《转折点:改变狄更斯与世界的一年》罗伯特·道格拉斯-菲尔赫斯特著。伦敦:2021年开普。355页,25英镑。ISBN 978-1-78733-070-2。这是一本非常聪明的书。对于一个完全不了解狄更斯的读者来说,他与他的时代的关系的整个故事都是以一种完整而易懂的形式展开的。大卫·科波菲尔是查尔斯·狄更斯的翻版。狄更斯首字母的“CD”是大卫首字母的反转。他的历史就是以1850年为中间点的整个维多利亚社会的历史。1850年是维多利亚文化胜利的中心年份,狄更斯的《我自己的故事》在这一年问世,丁尼生伟大的自传体挽歌《追忆》在这一年问世,华兹华斯的杰作《序曲》也在这一年首次出版。本书标题的“转折点”也是一个物理结构,即1851年5月1日在水晶宫开幕的大展览,对本研究来说,它体现了大英帝国最富裕、最辉煌的物质成就。到1851年,这个拥有工业、海军和对大部分欠发达国家的控制的小岛,可以说是世界上有史以来最强大的文明。狄更斯是其中的核心人物。狄更斯的个人生活是一个稳定的社会进步的故事,英国的阶级制度为他的许多情节提供了支柱。《远大前程》中的皮普实现了那个时代许多雄心勃勃、社会地位低下的年轻人的梦想。与此同时,他的故事令人震惊地表明,突然和意外获得巨额财富可能是一种灾难性的社会罪恶。这部小说的情节,以及它错综复杂的隐藏关系网络,显示了狄更斯的另一个主要关注点。隐藏的关系形成了一个网络,支撑着狄更斯几部杰作的情节,尤其是《荒凉山庄》、《远大前程》和《我们共同的朋友》。在他的写作生涯中,狄更斯既利用了上个世纪推动成长小说的力量,也遵循了更大更广泛的叙事传统,这也推动了堂吉诃德的发展。《大卫·科波菲尔》和《远大前程》这两部以一个人物的生活为中心的小说,本身就是一个惊人的叙事大杂烩,其中充满了事件,所有这些事件都是一个重要模式的一部分。《荒凉山庄》所做的不止于此,这本书还表明,它的混乱事件让一些最初的读者感到失望和困惑。在早期的一些叙述中,迷雾是通过一系列的语言片段呈现的,这些片段拒绝形成独立的句子。罗伯特·道格拉斯·菲尔赫斯特在这里对狄更斯的散文进行了解构,并以此证明了一种新的叙事写作方式已经发展起来。他还提供了一些有趣的信息,说这本书的工作笔记杂乱无章,“写在淡蓝色的纸上,每章往往只有几个关键词”(第244页)。在印刷文本中,主要动词“已经消失了,取而代之的是分词,这些分词描述的是人们坐着挤来挤去,滑来滑去,但没有任何目的或方向感”(第246页)。在这部小说中,狄更斯的散文“被粉碎成无意义的碎片,可以被清理和再利用”(第246页)。就好像我们看到的是“未经整理和重新包装成故事之前的原始的、未成形的经验”(第247页)。这本书揭示了狄更斯对绝对控制的无情追求,这是他一生和成功的一个关键特征。当他的女儿称他为“非常邪恶的人”时,她不仅指的是他在自己的家庭圈子里的专制主义,还指的是他在创作和个人生活的大多数方面都表现出的对权力和社会优势的强烈欲望。他的“合作”出版物实际上是独裁统治。他需要在他想象的世界里拥有一切,形成一个……
{"title":"The Turning Point: A Year that Changed Dickens and the World by Robert Douglas-Fairhurst (review)","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/mlr.2023.a907858","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mlr.2023.a907858","url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: The Turning Point: A Year that Changed Dickens and the World by Robert Douglas-Fairhurst John Batchelor The Turning Point: A Year that Changed Dickens and the World. By Robert Douglas-Fairhurst. London: Cape. 2021. 355 pp. £25. ISBN 978–1–78733–070–2. This is an extraordinarily clever book. For a reader who is completely new to Dickens, the whole story of his relationship with his age is set out in a full and comprehensible form. David Copperfield is a mirror of Charles Dickens. The 'CD' of Dickens's initials are a reversal of David's initials. His history is the history of the whole of Victorian society taking 1850 as its midpoint. 1850 was a triumphal central year in Victorian culture, the year of Dickens's 'story of my own life', of Tennyson's great autobiographical elegy 'In Memoriam', and also of the first publication of Wordsworth's masterpiece, The Prelude. The 'turning point' of this book's title also is a physical structure, the Great Exhibition in the Crystal Palace, opened 1 May 1851, which for this study embodies the material success of the British Empire at its most affluent and resplendent. By 1851, this little island, with its industries, [End Page 614] its navies, and its command of much of the underdeveloped world, was arguably the most powerful civilization that the world had ever seen. Dickens was at the heart of it. Dickens's personal life story had been one of steady social advancement, and the British class system provided the spine of many of his plots. Pip in Great Expectations lives the dream of many a young, ambitious, and socially disadvantaged man of the period. At the same time, his story shows, shockingly, that sudden and unexpected access to great wealth can be a disastrous social evil. The plotting of this novel, with its elaborate network of hidden relationships, displays another of Dickens's leading preoccupations. Hidden relationships form a network which sustains the plot of several of Dickens's masterpieces, and this is particularly true of Bleak House, Great Expectations, and Our Mutual Friend. In his writing life, Dickens was both harnessing the energies of the previous century that drove the Bildungsroman, the novel of initiation and development as practised by Fielding, and following the bigger and broader traditions of narrative which drove Don Quixote. The novels which centre on the life of a single figure, David Copperfield and Great Expectations, are themselves phenomenal ragbags of narrative, packed with incidents all of which are part of a significant pattern. Bleak House does more than that, and this book shows that its tumult of incident disappointed and mystified some of its first readers. The fog which dominates some of the early narrative is presented in a sequence of verbal fragments which refuse to form discrete sentences. Robert Douglas-Fairhurst unpicks Dickens's prose here and in so doing demonstrates that a new kind of narrative writing has been evolved. He throws in the fasci","PeriodicalId":45399,"journal":{"name":"MODERN LANGUAGE REVIEW","volume":"47 17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134933737","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Transcultural Memory and European Identity in Contemporary German-Jewish Migrant Literature by Jessica Ortner (review) 当代德国犹太移民文学中的跨文化记忆与欧洲认同——杰西卡·奥特纳(评论)
4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.1353/mlr.2023.a907872
Reviewed by: Transcultural Memory and European Identity in Contemporary German-Jewish Migrant Literature by Jessica Ortner Stuart Taberner Transcultural Memory and European Identity in Contemporary German-Jewish Migrant Literature. By Jessica Ortner. Rochester, NY: Camden House. 2022. 285 pp. £85. ISBN 978–16–401–4022–6. There is much to recommend this volume. In it, Jessica Ortner examines recent German-language writers with a Jewish background whose lived experience of the Soviet Union (or, in the case of Barbara Honigmann, the former East Germany) introduces Eastern European histories into a historical narrative that has largely been [End Page 636] shaped by Western institutions. Whether it is Stalinist crimes, Soviet antisemitism, or less familiar sites of the Nazi genocide, these writers offer an important corrective, Ortner argues, to dominant social, political, and cultural discourses that tend to construct 'Auschwitz' as the single most significant memory around which Europe could—or should—shape a unified identity. Ortner thus offers an important contribution to the scholarly literature on the 'Eastern turn' (Brigid Haines: see 'Introduction: The Eastern European Turn in Contemporary German-Language Literature', German Life and Letters, 68 (2015), 145–53 ) in recent German-language writing and inflects this with an emphasis on the migration of Jewish memories from east to west following the fall of the Berlin Wall and the end of the Cold War. This also relates, of course, to the spectacular revival of the Jewish community in Germany following the arrival after 1990 of around 200,000 people from the former Soviet Union able to claim Jewish heritage. Ortner's book is organized into three sections. The first gives a detailed overview of and engagement with the 'mnemonic divide' between Eastern and Western Europe, with countries that once belonged to the Soviet bloc tending to their victimization under communism while Western European countries focus on the Nazi genocide. This section also attends to recent scholarship in memory studies and identifies the volume's original contribution to this literature. Section 11 examines three contemporary authors, Vladimir Vertlib, Katja Petrowskaja, and Barbara Honigmann, and specifically their endeavours to parallel Stalinism with Nazi crimes—without, however, relativizing the Holocaust. Section in then examines two writers, Olga Grjasnowa and Lena Gorelik, who more explicitly contest Germany's dominant memory culture, by de-emphasizing the uniqueness of the Holocaust and placing it within a multidirectional, transcultural framework alongside other atrocities and injustices—for example, the Armenian genocide or even Israel's military interventions in the West Bank and Gaza. The close readings are detailed, generally sound, and occasionally excellent. The chapter on Petrowskaja, then, is highly illuminating in its detailed and nuanced focus on the memory politics of
当代德国犹太移民文学中的跨文化记忆与欧洲认同杰西卡·奥特纳著。纽约州罗切斯特:卡姆登之家,2022年。285页,85英镑。ISBN 978-16-401-4022-6。这本书有很多值得推荐的地方。在这本书中,杰西卡·奥特纳(Jessica Ortner)考察了近年来具有犹太背景的德语作家,他们在苏联(或者像芭芭拉·霍尼格曼(Barbara Honigmann)那样,在前东德生活过的经历,将东欧历史引入了一种主要由西方机构塑造的历史叙事中。奥特纳认为,无论是斯大林主义的罪行、苏联的反犹主义,还是人们不太熟悉的纳粹种族灭绝遗址,这些作家都为主流的社会、政治和文化话语提供了重要的纠正,这些话语倾向于将“奥斯维辛”构建为欧洲能够或应该形成统一身份的唯一最重要的记忆。因此,奥特纳在最近的德语写作中对“东方转向”的学术文献做出了重要贡献(布里吉德·海恩斯:见“引言:当代德语文学中的东欧转向”,《德国生活与书信》,68(2015),145-53),并强调了柏林墙倒塌和冷战结束后犹太人记忆从东向西的迁移。当然,这也与1990年后大约20万前苏联人来到德国后犹太社区的壮观复兴有关,这些人能够声称拥有犹太遗产。奥特纳的书分为三个部分。第一部分详细概述了东欧和西欧之间的“记忆分裂”,曾经属于苏联集团的国家倾向于共产主义下的受害者,而西欧国家则专注于纳粹的种族灭绝。本节还出席了最近的学术记忆研究,并确定卷的原始贡献,这一文献。第11部分考察了三位当代作家,弗拉基米尔·维特利布、卡佳·彼得罗夫斯卡娅和芭芭拉·霍尼格曼,特别是他们将斯大林主义与纳粹罪行相提并论的努力——然而,没有将大屠杀相对化。接下来的部分考察了两位作家,Olga Grjasnowa和Lena Gorelik,他们通过不强调大屠杀的独特性,将其与其他暴行和不公正——例如亚美尼亚种族灭绝,甚至以色列对西岸和加沙的军事干预——放在一个多向的、跨文化的框架中,更明确地挑战德国占主导地位的记忆文化。细读是详细的,总体上是健全的,有时是优秀的。因此,关于彼得罗夫斯卡娅的那一章非常有启发性,因为它详细而细致地关注了苏联和后苏联对大屠杀的记忆政治,而关于霍尼格曼的那一章则揭示了她的作品中一个被忽视的方面,即她对共产主义压迫的描述。这是一本雄心勃勃的书,很大程度上是“有效的”。有时候,奥特纳可能夸大了她所谓的社会记忆框架的规范性力量。欧盟很可能会根据大屠杀的记忆,要求对欧洲的过去做出特定的解释,但很明显,成员国,更重要的是,每个公民,对自己的记忆有着广泛的分歧,甚至是相反的。奥特纳的论文不需要详细提及欧盟的政策就具有说服力。同样,这本书的两个主要论点——东欧作家关注斯大林主义而不是大屠杀,以及东欧犹太作家关注大屠杀的不同方面——有时彼此矛盾,或者至少这两个论点之间的相互作用并不总是清晰地表达出来。然而,这些都是框架问题,或者是与表达清晰度有关的偶尔的缺陷,并没有减损近距离阅读的说服力和全书的整体独创性。研究当代德国和德国犹太文学的学者会发现,奥特纳的《跨文化记忆》一书非常有用,因为它为前苏联(和民主德国)作家对当前关于德国(以及更普遍的西方)记忆文化的辩论做出了贡献。然而,更重要的是,它的细读……
{"title":"Transcultural Memory and European Identity in Contemporary German-Jewish Migrant Literature by Jessica Ortner (review)","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/mlr.2023.a907872","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mlr.2023.a907872","url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Transcultural Memory and European Identity in Contemporary German-Jewish Migrant Literature by Jessica Ortner Stuart Taberner Transcultural Memory and European Identity in Contemporary German-Jewish Migrant Literature. By Jessica Ortner. Rochester, NY: Camden House. 2022. 285 pp. £85. ISBN 978–16–401–4022–6. There is much to recommend this volume. In it, Jessica Ortner examines recent German-language writers with a Jewish background whose lived experience of the Soviet Union (or, in the case of Barbara Honigmann, the former East Germany) introduces Eastern European histories into a historical narrative that has largely been [End Page 636] shaped by Western institutions. Whether it is Stalinist crimes, Soviet antisemitism, or less familiar sites of the Nazi genocide, these writers offer an important corrective, Ortner argues, to dominant social, political, and cultural discourses that tend to construct 'Auschwitz' as the single most significant memory around which Europe could—or should—shape a unified identity. Ortner thus offers an important contribution to the scholarly literature on the 'Eastern turn' (Brigid Haines: see 'Introduction: The Eastern European Turn in Contemporary German-Language Literature', German Life and Letters, 68 (2015), 145–53 <https://doi.Zorg/10.1111/glal.12073>) in recent German-language writing and inflects this with an emphasis on the migration of Jewish memories from east to west following the fall of the Berlin Wall and the end of the Cold War. This also relates, of course, to the spectacular revival of the Jewish community in Germany following the arrival after 1990 of around 200,000 people from the former Soviet Union able to claim Jewish heritage. Ortner's book is organized into three sections. The first gives a detailed overview of and engagement with the 'mnemonic divide' between Eastern and Western Europe, with countries that once belonged to the Soviet bloc tending to their victimization under communism while Western European countries focus on the Nazi genocide. This section also attends to recent scholarship in memory studies and identifies the volume's original contribution to this literature. Section 11 examines three contemporary authors, Vladimir Vertlib, Katja Petrowskaja, and Barbara Honigmann, and specifically their endeavours to parallel Stalinism with Nazi crimes—without, however, relativizing the Holocaust. Section in then examines two writers, Olga Grjasnowa and Lena Gorelik, who more explicitly contest Germany's dominant memory culture, by de-emphasizing the uniqueness of the Holocaust and placing it within a multidirectional, transcultural framework alongside other atrocities and injustices—for example, the Armenian genocide or even Israel's military interventions in the West Bank and Gaza. The close readings are detailed, generally sound, and occasionally excellent. The chapter on Petrowskaja, then, is highly illuminating in its detailed and nuanced focus on the memory politics of","PeriodicalId":45399,"journal":{"name":"MODERN LANGUAGE REVIEW","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134933774","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Adaptations: Critical and Primary Sources ed. by Deborah Cartmell and Imelda Whelehan (review) 改编:黛博拉·卡特梅尔和伊梅尔达·惠勒汉主编的关键和主要来源(评论)
4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.1353/mlr.2023.a907844
Reviewed by: Adaptations: Critical and Primary Sources ed. by Deborah Cartmell and Imelda Whelehan Kate Griffiths Adaptations: Critical and Primary Sources. Ed. by Deborah Cartmell and Imelda Whelehan. 3 vols. New York: Bloomsbury. 2022. x+ 357 pp. (vol. i); xi+ 426 pp. (vol. ii); xi+ 466 pp. (vol. iii). £495. ISBN 978–1–5013–1540–4. Deborah Cartmell and Imelda Whelehan's three-volume set of critical and primary sources on adaptation is a much-needed addition to the discipline of Adaptation Studies. It traces, via a compellingly contrastive range of critical voices, the complicated relationship between source texts and their afterlives in an ever expanding range of different media. Ranging from Vachel Lindsay in 1915 to Thomas M. Leitch in 2019, Cartmell and Whelehan set themselves the daunting task of compiling the cacophonous voices commenting on and theorizing the much-disputed art of adaptation between those dates. The value of their compendium is clear. The range and diversity of their coverage maps the plethora of thinkers contributing to the discipline that is Adaptation Studies, documenting its evolution, definitions, and development. The conversations between these different thinkers take us, as readers, to the heart of the existential questions which both power and haunt Adaptation Studies: What is adaptation? What are the formative forces shaping its outputs? What is the value of those outputs? What is Adaptation Studies? How might we theorize it? Where does Adaptation Studies sit as a discipline? How do we map its borders and boundaries? Cartmell and Whelehan's collection offers no simplistic, finite answer to any of those questions. Rather, it embraces the wealth of possible responses to them, exploring the ways in which different historical moments, thinkers, creative practitioners, political contexts, and theoretical turns have answered these and other questions in intriguingly diverse ways. The compendium's focus is the history of adaptation from the early twentieth century. It deliberately takes the birth of film, the medium which would impact so powerfully on adaptation and its study, as its starting point. Subsequently, the progression is chronological. Volume i covers the period 1900–93, volume ii 1996–2007, volume iii 2007–20. The greatest space by far is allocated to the years from 1993 onwards, reflecting the acceleration and accumulation of research in this area as Adaptation Studies turned and re-turned in different theoretical directions. This collection of essays does not over-privilege the years from 1993 onwards, though. Rather, it underlines, in the telling intersections between each of its three volumes, the ways in which the present of Adaptation Studies speaks to and is shaped by its past, and itself actively shapes that past. [End Page 591] The collection offers valuable correctives to our vision of adaptation history. It has become a commonplace that Adaptation Studies began with George Bluestone's 1957 'The Lim
由黛博拉·卡特梅尔和伊梅尔达·惠勒汉凯特·格里菲斯主编的《改编:关键和主要来源》审查。黛博拉·卡特梅尔和伊梅尔达·惠勒汉主编,3卷。纽约:布鲁姆斯伯里出版社,2022。X + 357 pp (vol. i);ISBN 978-1-5013-1540-4。黛博拉·卡特梅尔和伊梅尔达·惠勒汉的三卷本关于适应的关键和主要资料集是适应研究学科急需的补充。它通过一系列具有鲜明对比的批评声音,在不断扩大的不同媒介范围中,追溯了原始文本与它们的来世之间的复杂关系。从1915年的瓦切尔·林赛(Vachel Lindsay)到2019年的托马斯·m·莱奇(Thomas M. Leitch),卡特梅尔和惠勒汉给自己设定了一项艰巨的任务,收集这些时期对备受争议的适应艺术进行评论和理论化的嘈杂声音。他们的纲要的价值是显而易见的。他们涵盖的范围和多样性描绘了对适应研究这门学科做出贡献的众多思想家,记录了它的演变、定义和发展。作为读者,这些不同思想家之间的对话将我们带到了存在主义问题的核心,这些问题既影响着适应研究,也困扰着它:什么是适应?形成其产出的力量是什么?这些输出的值是什么?什么是适应研究?我们如何将其理论化呢?适应研究作为一门学科处于什么位置?我们如何绘制它的边界和边界?卡特梅尔和惠勒汉的藏品并没有对这些问题给出简单、有限的答案。相反,它包含了对这些问题的丰富可能的回应,探索了不同的历史时刻、思想家、创造性实践者、政治背景和理论转向以有趣的不同方式回答这些问题和其他问题的方式。该纲要的重点是20世纪初以来的改编史。它有意以电影的诞生作为起点,因为电影这种媒介对改编及其研究产生了巨大的影响。随后,进程是按时间顺序进行的。第一卷涵盖1900 - 1993年期间,第二卷涵盖1996-2007年期间,第三卷涵盖2007 - 2020年期间。到目前为止,最大的空间分配给1993年以后的年份,反映了适应研究在不同理论方向上的转向和回归,这一领域的研究加速和积累。不过,这本文集并没有过分强调1993年以后的年份。相反,它通过三卷书之间生动的交叉,强调了适应研究的现状是如何与过去对话、被过去塑造的,以及它自己如何积极塑造过去。这本合集为我们对改编史的看法提供了有价值的纠正。改编研究始于乔治·布鲁斯通1957年的《小说的极限和电影的极限》(在他的小说变成电影:小说变成电影的变形(巴尔的摩:约翰·霍普金斯大学出版社,1961)),这已经成为一种司空见惯的现象。然而,这个汇编再现了在蓝石的作品之前发表的八个关于改编的重要讨论:林赛·瓦切尔、弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫、谢尔盖·爱森斯坦、安德烈·巴赞、莱斯特·阿什海姆和弗朗索瓦·特吕弗的作品。卡特梅尔和惠勒汉的纲要还指出,正如卡米拉·艾略特所指出的那样,有一段适应的历史可以追溯到奥古斯都时期和更早的时期(第一卷导言,第5页)。尽管再多出一卷来描绘这段史前历史将是非常受欢迎的,但仅仅承认它的存在是重要的。它强调,适应研究作为一门学科的来源在许多方面与它所研究的人工制品的来源一样不断变化。虽然这些编辑卷的方法是按时间顺序排列的,但卡特梅尔和惠勒汉的项目不仅仅是调查工作。他们对每卷的精辟和有用的概括性介绍将我们带到了适应研究的基础辩论的核心。每卷中思想家的并置所产生的对比和对话也是如此。本书的作者包括影评人、来自不同学科的理论家、艺术家、电影制作人、编剧、历史学家等,既必要又令人耳目一新。这说明了内在的交叉性……
{"title":"Adaptations: Critical and Primary Sources ed. by Deborah Cartmell and Imelda Whelehan (review)","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/mlr.2023.a907844","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mlr.2023.a907844","url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Adaptations: Critical and Primary Sources ed. by Deborah Cartmell and Imelda Whelehan Kate Griffiths Adaptations: Critical and Primary Sources. Ed. by Deborah Cartmell and Imelda Whelehan. 3 vols. New York: Bloomsbury. 2022. x+ 357 pp. (vol. i); xi+ 426 pp. (vol. ii); xi+ 466 pp. (vol. iii). £495. ISBN 978–1–5013–1540–4. Deborah Cartmell and Imelda Whelehan's three-volume set of critical and primary sources on adaptation is a much-needed addition to the discipline of Adaptation Studies. It traces, via a compellingly contrastive range of critical voices, the complicated relationship between source texts and their afterlives in an ever expanding range of different media. Ranging from Vachel Lindsay in 1915 to Thomas M. Leitch in 2019, Cartmell and Whelehan set themselves the daunting task of compiling the cacophonous voices commenting on and theorizing the much-disputed art of adaptation between those dates. The value of their compendium is clear. The range and diversity of their coverage maps the plethora of thinkers contributing to the discipline that is Adaptation Studies, documenting its evolution, definitions, and development. The conversations between these different thinkers take us, as readers, to the heart of the existential questions which both power and haunt Adaptation Studies: What is adaptation? What are the formative forces shaping its outputs? What is the value of those outputs? What is Adaptation Studies? How might we theorize it? Where does Adaptation Studies sit as a discipline? How do we map its borders and boundaries? Cartmell and Whelehan's collection offers no simplistic, finite answer to any of those questions. Rather, it embraces the wealth of possible responses to them, exploring the ways in which different historical moments, thinkers, creative practitioners, political contexts, and theoretical turns have answered these and other questions in intriguingly diverse ways. The compendium's focus is the history of adaptation from the early twentieth century. It deliberately takes the birth of film, the medium which would impact so powerfully on adaptation and its study, as its starting point. Subsequently, the progression is chronological. Volume i covers the period 1900–93, volume ii 1996–2007, volume iii 2007–20. The greatest space by far is allocated to the years from 1993 onwards, reflecting the acceleration and accumulation of research in this area as Adaptation Studies turned and re-turned in different theoretical directions. This collection of essays does not over-privilege the years from 1993 onwards, though. Rather, it underlines, in the telling intersections between each of its three volumes, the ways in which the present of Adaptation Studies speaks to and is shaped by its past, and itself actively shapes that past. [End Page 591] The collection offers valuable correctives to our vision of adaptation history. It has become a commonplace that Adaptation Studies began with George Bluestone's 1957 'The Lim","PeriodicalId":45399,"journal":{"name":"MODERN LANGUAGE REVIEW","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134935005","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Selected Letters: A Bilingual Edition, 1523–1546 by Vittoria Colonna (review) 《书信选集:双语版,1523-1546》作者:维多利亚·科隆纳
4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.1353/mlr.2023.a907866
Reviewed by: Selected Letters: A Bilingual Edition, 1523–1546 by Vittoria Colonna Maria Serena Sapegno Selected Letters: A Bilingual Edition, 1523–1546. By Vittoria Colonna. Ed. by Veronica Copello; trans, by Abigail Brundin. (The Other Voice in Early Modern Europe: The Toronto Series, 88) New York: Iter Press. 2022. xiv + 186 pp. $48.95. ISBN 978–1–64959–028–2. This volume completes the string of texts dedicated to Vittoria Colonna in the same series, The Other Voice in Early Modern Europe—Sonnets for Michelangelo: A Bilingual Edition, ed. and trans. by Abigail Brundin (Chicago, 2005); Poems of Widowhood: A Bilingual Edition of the 1538 'Rime', ed. and trans. by Ramie Targoff (Toronto, 2021)—in a remarkable achievement. A larger public is now in a position to evaluate the significance of a complex personality and a writer who was a unique model for European women in her time: the first to have a book of poetry printed in her name. [End Page 626] The historical-critical Introduction helps to situate Vittoria Colonna's epistolary activity within a public and private life that was complicated and intense, and not without difficult or even dramatic moments. Her life, after the untimely death of her husband in 1525, was always traversed by a tension between, on the one hand, the allure of meditative withdrawal into a regime of prayer and writing and, on the other, the need to fulfil family and social commitments related to her position as a member of the ruling class. Colonna's collected letters, which, thanks to intense research in recent years, now stand at about 270 documents and may grow further, reflect the richness and variety of her life and interlocutors, as manifested in the plurality of stylistic registers and variety of content. For these reasons, the undertaking presented the two editors with the far from straightforward task of making a selection that would preserve this richness and make sense of it in an already complex and fast-moving historical and cultural context. Incidentally, this is precisely the period when, thanks to the press, epistolary writing was on its way to becoming a literary genre in its own right, through the publication of model texts and collections by various authors, among whom Colonna herself finds a place. Pietro Aretino, her correspondent and admirer, published the first printed collection of letters in 1538. The edition comprisese forty letters covering the period from 1523 (before her husband's death) to 1546 (shortly before her own death in 1547). This selection, although limited in number, manages to give an idea of the social position of the writer, her authority, and her wide network of relationships, to provide an insight into her interests, her passions, and, last but not least, her opinions in diverse fields and subjects. Many of these letters are in fact among her most famous. Each letter has its own introduction that explains its importance and meaning, references the critical bibliography, and, ver
书评:《书信选集:双语版,1523-1546》,作者:维多利亚·科隆纳,玛丽亚·塞雷娜·萨佩尼奥维多利亚·科隆纳著。维罗妮卡·科佩罗编辑;阿比盖尔·布伦丁译。(早期现代欧洲的另一种声音:多伦多系列,1988)纽约:Iter出版社,2022。Xiv + 186页,48.95美元。ISBN 978-1-64959-028-2。本卷完成了同一系列中献给维多利亚·科隆纳的一系列文本,早期现代欧洲的另一种声音-米开朗基罗十四行诗:双语版,编辑和翻译。阿比盖尔·布伦丁著(芝加哥,2005年);寡妇的诗:1538年《诗韵》的双语版,编辑和翻译。拉米·塔戈夫(Ramie Targoff)(多伦多,2021年)——一个了不起的成就。现在,更多的公众能够评价一个复杂的人格和一个作家的意义,她是她那个时代欧洲女性的独特典范:第一个以她的名字出版诗集的人。[End Page 626]历史批判的导言有助于将维多利亚·科隆纳的书信活动置于复杂而激烈的公共和私人生活中,并不是没有困难甚至戏剧性的时刻。1525年,她的丈夫英年早逝,此后她的生活一直处于一种紧张的状态中,一方面,她沉迷于冥想,沉迷于祈祷和写作,另一方面,她作为统治阶级的一员,需要履行家庭和社会责任。由于近年来的深入研究,科隆纳收集的信件现在大约有270份,并且可能会进一步增加,反映了她的生活和对话者的丰富性和多样性,体现在文体的多样性和内容的多样性上。由于这些原因,这两位编辑面临着一项远非直截了当的任务,即在已经复杂和快速发展的历史和文化背景下,进行选择,以保存这种丰富性并使其有意义。顺便说一句,正是在这个时期,多亏了媒体,书信体写作正在成为一种独立的文学类型,通过各种作者的示范文本和文集的出版,科隆纳自己也在其中找到了一席之地。1538年,她的通讯员兼仰慕者彼得罗·阿雷蒂诺(Pietro Aretino)出版了第一本印刷书信集。这一版本包括40封书信,时间跨度从1523年(她丈夫去世前)到1546年(1547年她自己去世前不久)。这些选集虽然数量有限,但却能让我们了解这位作家的社会地位、权威和广泛的人际关系,让我们深入了解她的兴趣、激情,以及她对不同领域和主题的看法。事实上,这些信件中有许多是她最著名的。每封信都有自己的引言,解释了它的重要性和意义,参考了重要的参考书目,并且,非常有用地考虑到对这一领域的日益关注,提供了最新的关键研究的更新。对文本的注释也丰富而准确,为理解内容提供了必要的信息。科隆纳的通信涉及重大主题和人物:给卡斯提里奥内,她谈到了科尔特吉亚诺,给枢机主教本博,部分归功于她的调解;她感谢查理五世对她丈夫去世的吊唁信,感谢米开朗基罗送来一幅耶稣受难像;她给保罗三世写了一封明确的信,为卷尾猴教会辩护,挑战以改革者自居的法尔内教皇。但也有三封特别长的,关于神学和精神深度的信,表明作者对积极生活和沉思生活之间的关系进行了反思,写给她丈夫家的一位年轻亲戚,科斯坦扎·达瓦洛斯。这些都是在1544年出版的一个小卷,但不清楚科隆纳是否授权出版。从这本值得赞扬的集子中,也许还不够清楚的是,书信形式在生活中的总体重要性……
{"title":"Selected Letters: A Bilingual Edition, 1523–1546 by Vittoria Colonna (review)","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/mlr.2023.a907866","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mlr.2023.a907866","url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Selected Letters: A Bilingual Edition, 1523–1546 by Vittoria Colonna Maria Serena Sapegno Selected Letters: A Bilingual Edition, 1523–1546. By Vittoria Colonna. Ed. by Veronica Copello; trans, by Abigail Brundin. (The Other Voice in Early Modern Europe: The Toronto Series, 88) New York: Iter Press. 2022. xiv + 186 pp. $48.95. ISBN 978–1–64959–028–2. This volume completes the string of texts dedicated to Vittoria Colonna in the same series, The Other Voice in Early Modern Europe—Sonnets for Michelangelo: A Bilingual Edition, ed. and trans. by Abigail Brundin (Chicago, 2005); Poems of Widowhood: A Bilingual Edition of the 1538 'Rime', ed. and trans. by Ramie Targoff (Toronto, 2021)—in a remarkable achievement. A larger public is now in a position to evaluate the significance of a complex personality and a writer who was a unique model for European women in her time: the first to have a book of poetry printed in her name. [End Page 626] The historical-critical Introduction helps to situate Vittoria Colonna's epistolary activity within a public and private life that was complicated and intense, and not without difficult or even dramatic moments. Her life, after the untimely death of her husband in 1525, was always traversed by a tension between, on the one hand, the allure of meditative withdrawal into a regime of prayer and writing and, on the other, the need to fulfil family and social commitments related to her position as a member of the ruling class. Colonna's collected letters, which, thanks to intense research in recent years, now stand at about 270 documents and may grow further, reflect the richness and variety of her life and interlocutors, as manifested in the plurality of stylistic registers and variety of content. For these reasons, the undertaking presented the two editors with the far from straightforward task of making a selection that would preserve this richness and make sense of it in an already complex and fast-moving historical and cultural context. Incidentally, this is precisely the period when, thanks to the press, epistolary writing was on its way to becoming a literary genre in its own right, through the publication of model texts and collections by various authors, among whom Colonna herself finds a place. Pietro Aretino, her correspondent and admirer, published the first printed collection of letters in 1538. The edition comprisese forty letters covering the period from 1523 (before her husband's death) to 1546 (shortly before her own death in 1547). This selection, although limited in number, manages to give an idea of the social position of the writer, her authority, and her wide network of relationships, to provide an insight into her interests, her passions, and, last but not least, her opinions in diverse fields and subjects. Many of these letters are in fact among her most famous. Each letter has its own introduction that explains its importance and meaning, references the critical bibliography, and, ver","PeriodicalId":45399,"journal":{"name":"MODERN LANGUAGE REVIEW","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134935010","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Art, Theory, Revolution: The Turn to Generality in Contemporary Literature by Mitchum Huehls (review) 艺术、理论、革命:米彻姆·休尔斯当代文学向普遍性的转向(书评)
4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.1353/mlr.2023.a907848
Reviewed by: Art, Theory, Revolution: The Turn to Generality in Contemporary Literature by Mitchum Huehls Peter Sloane Art, Theory, Revolution: The Turn to Generality in Contemporary Literature. By Mitchum Huehls. Columbus: Ohio State University Press. 2022. 198 pp. $69.95. ISBN 978–0–8142–1524–1. Mitchum Huehls sets himself a difficult challenge in his deeply thoughtful and philosophically astute study of the relationship between literary form and politics in the contemporary period, more specifically the post-period following the various playful and often exaggerated nihilisms and endings attendant on the postmodern. On the one hand he makes a sophisticated series of claims about the ways in which current literary fiction continues to exploit forms' potential for various kinds of resistance (even to resistance itself) by engaging with what he describes as the 'form-politics homology' (p. 6); on the other, in a series of insightful close readings of the specifics of his chosen figures—including Chris Kraus, Percival Everett, Zadie Smith, and Rachel Kushner—he argues that some have instead 'turned to the single-general relationship' (p. 6). Either one of these might warrant a monograph, [End Page 598] but the point of Huehls's study is that these interrogations work together to give rise to a peculiarly post-postmodern set of entanglements between art, theory, and revolution. Intriguingly, as I suggest below, though this is not stated explicitly, the study is fundamentally interested in the work performed by the hyphen in these two conjunctions, the relationships, dependencies, and linkages implied by that, and by its possible erasure or refiguration. The Introduction is extensive, wide-ranging, and if at times hard to follow because it goes in at the deep end, worth reading closely because the theoretical framework is both rewarding in itself and vital if sense is to made of the following chapters. Much of the hard work takes place here, Huehls outlining the case that he will reinforce in his Conclusion, that his subjects 'develop generalized forms of value production irreducible' to the 'homological thought' of their predecessors in the modernist or pre-modernist periods (p. 153). Chapter 1 is concerned with 'Art, Life-Writing, and the Generic', focusing on Sheila Heti and Chris Kraus, arguing that they explore 'the problem of being a person in the world' and reconceive the 'nature of female selfhood' (p. 40). Chapter 2 turns to 'Theory, Metafiction, and Constructivism', asking the question that, if theory is 'supposedly dead', why is it still so 'alive and well in contemporary fiction?' (p. 75). Finally, Chapter 3 gets to grips with 'Revolution, Historical Fiction, and Gesture', to propose that Peter Carey, Viet Nguyen, Dana Spiotta, and other writers of recent historical fiction use 'their own forms of realism to think through the formal impasses that beset the various revolutionary activities that their content comprises' (p. 113). As I hint
书评:《艺术、理论、革命:当代文学的普遍性转向》,作者:米彻姆·休尔斯,彼得·斯隆米彻姆·赫尔斯著。哥伦布:俄亥俄州立大学出版社,2022。198页,69.95美元。ISBN 978-0-8142-1524-1。米彻姆·休尔斯对当代文学形式和政治之间的关系进行了深刻的思考和哲学上的敏锐研究,更具体地说,在后时期,随着各种有趣的、经常被夸大的虚无主义和后现代主义的结束,他给自己设置了一个困难的挑战。一方面,他提出了一系列复杂的主张,关于当前文学小说继续利用形式的各种抵抗(甚至抵抗本身)的潜力的方式,通过参与他所描述的“形式-政治同源性”(第6页);另一方面,在一系列深刻的亲密的他选择的细节而克里斯•克劳斯珀西瓦尔埃弗雷特、扎迪·史密斯,和瑞秋Kushner-he认为一些人而不是“转向single-general关系”(p。6)。其中一个可能需要一个专著(页598)但Huehls的研究的重点是,这些审讯共同产生一组post-postmodern特有的艺术之间的纠葛,理论,和革命。有趣的是,正如我下面建议的那样,尽管没有明确说明,但这项研究从根本上对这两个连词中的连字符所做的工作感兴趣,它所隐含的关系、依赖和联系,以及它可能的删除或重构。导论内容广泛,涉及面广,虽然有时很难理解,但值得仔细阅读,因为它的理论框架本身就很有价值,而且对于后面的章节也很有意义。许多艰苦的工作发生在这里,Huehls概述了他将在结论中强调的情况,即他的主体“发展了不可简化的价值生产的一般形式”,与他们在现代主义或前现代主义时期的前辈的“同质思想”(第153页)。第一章是关于“艺术,生活写作和一般”,重点关注希拉·海蒂和克里斯·克劳斯,认为他们探索了“在世界上成为一个人的问题”,并重新认识了“女性自我的本质”(第40页)。第二章转向“理论、元小说和建构主义”,提出了这样一个问题:如果理论“被认为已经死亡”,为什么它在当代小说中仍然如此“活跃”?(第75页)。最后,第三章讨论了“革命、历史小说和姿态”,提出彼得·凯里、阮越、达纳·斯皮奥塔和其他近代历史小说作家使用“他们自己的现实主义形式来思考围绕着他们的内容所包含的各种革命活动的形式僵局”(第113页)。正如我上面所暗示的,Huehls所做的,在一种无望但我认为准确的简化解读中,是质疑两个术语之间通过连字符形成的联系或联系的强度。换句话说,如果后现代时期承诺、威胁或嘲弄对艺术-政治同源性的解构,那么它是通过溶解结缔组织来实现的,就像它是接触点一样。然而,Huehls认为,另一种形式的松散关系得以维持,不是通过像“痕迹”这样模糊的东西,而是通过先前的纠缠;从某种意义上说,新的自由形式——美学的、政治的和美学-政治的——在空出来的空间中出现了:这种形式是“普遍的”。这项工作是雄心勃勃的,但因为它是建立在密切关注文本例子的基础上的,所以思想清晰而令人信服(随着章节的进行,更令人信服)。休尔斯令人信服地得出结论,这里研究的作家从“形式与政治之间没有必要联系的假设”开始,转向更普遍的“价值特设方法”(人性、政治、美学等)(第153页)。当然,在某种程度上,这只是对现代主义的重新表述,甚至是对“为艺术而艺术”的美学概念的重新表述。因此,在一系列典范文本中,休尔斯创作了一部具有广泛吸引力的文学理论作品,他的见解……
{"title":"Art, Theory, Revolution: The Turn to Generality in Contemporary Literature by Mitchum Huehls (review)","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/mlr.2023.a907848","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mlr.2023.a907848","url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Art, Theory, Revolution: The Turn to Generality in Contemporary Literature by Mitchum Huehls Peter Sloane Art, Theory, Revolution: The Turn to Generality in Contemporary Literature. By Mitchum Huehls. Columbus: Ohio State University Press. 2022. 198 pp. $69.95. ISBN 978–0–8142–1524–1. Mitchum Huehls sets himself a difficult challenge in his deeply thoughtful and philosophically astute study of the relationship between literary form and politics in the contemporary period, more specifically the post-period following the various playful and often exaggerated nihilisms and endings attendant on the postmodern. On the one hand he makes a sophisticated series of claims about the ways in which current literary fiction continues to exploit forms' potential for various kinds of resistance (even to resistance itself) by engaging with what he describes as the 'form-politics homology' (p. 6); on the other, in a series of insightful close readings of the specifics of his chosen figures—including Chris Kraus, Percival Everett, Zadie Smith, and Rachel Kushner—he argues that some have instead 'turned to the single-general relationship' (p. 6). Either one of these might warrant a monograph, [End Page 598] but the point of Huehls's study is that these interrogations work together to give rise to a peculiarly post-postmodern set of entanglements between art, theory, and revolution. Intriguingly, as I suggest below, though this is not stated explicitly, the study is fundamentally interested in the work performed by the hyphen in these two conjunctions, the relationships, dependencies, and linkages implied by that, and by its possible erasure or refiguration. The Introduction is extensive, wide-ranging, and if at times hard to follow because it goes in at the deep end, worth reading closely because the theoretical framework is both rewarding in itself and vital if sense is to made of the following chapters. Much of the hard work takes place here, Huehls outlining the case that he will reinforce in his Conclusion, that his subjects 'develop generalized forms of value production irreducible' to the 'homological thought' of their predecessors in the modernist or pre-modernist periods (p. 153). Chapter 1 is concerned with 'Art, Life-Writing, and the Generic', focusing on Sheila Heti and Chris Kraus, arguing that they explore 'the problem of being a person in the world' and reconceive the 'nature of female selfhood' (p. 40). Chapter 2 turns to 'Theory, Metafiction, and Constructivism', asking the question that, if theory is 'supposedly dead', why is it still so 'alive and well in contemporary fiction?' (p. 75). Finally, Chapter 3 gets to grips with 'Revolution, Historical Fiction, and Gesture', to propose that Peter Carey, Viet Nguyen, Dana Spiotta, and other writers of recent historical fiction use 'their own forms of realism to think through the formal impasses that beset the various revolutionary activities that their content comprises' (p. 113). As I hint","PeriodicalId":45399,"journal":{"name":"MODERN LANGUAGE REVIEW","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134935196","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
From Puppet to Cyborg: Pinocchio's Posthuman Journey by Georgia Panteli (review) 从木偶到电子人:匹诺曹的后人类之旅
4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.1353/mlr.2023.a907846
Reviewed by: From Puppet to Cyborg: Pinocchio's Posthuman Journey by Georgia Panteli Kelly Mckisson From Puppet to Cyborg: Pinocchio's Posthuman Journey. By Georgia Panteli. (Studies in Comparative Literature, 40) Cambridge: Legenda. 2022. xi+ 178 pp. £85. ISBN 978–1–781887–12–7. When in 2023 Guillermo Del Toro's stop-motion adaptation of Pinocchio won the Oscar for best animated feature, audiences were again captivated by the adventures of the now one-hundred-and-forty-year-old mischievous puppet. Carlo Collodi's classic, first serialized in an Italian children's magazine in 1881–82, and then expanded and published as a novel in 1883, has been so widely translated and adapted that it remains 'one of the most famous texts in the world' (p. 1). So proclaims the first line of Georgia Panteli's slim book, From Puppet to Cyborg. Panteli's comparative project tracks contemporary retellings of the Pinocchio myth and analyses how they reinterpret and revise the original's concern with a desire to be human. The pleasure of reading Panteli's book comes not from one centrally sustained argument but instead from thought-provoking insights revealed by unearthing Pinocchio elements in multiple recent reimaginings, across three media forms and multiple languages. As the title suggests, Panteli's survey makes a suitable case for the Pinocchio myth, and especially the wooden boy's desires, as an early precursor to posthuman narratives—here, readers should expect the posthumanism aligned with Nick Bostrum's Tn Defense of Posthuman Dignity' (Bioethics, 19.3 (2005), 202–14), which refers to the transhuman or superhuman extension of the human category. Panteli moves from cyborg Pinocchios in science fiction film and television to ironic Pinocchios in postmodern metafiction and then to subversive Pinocchios in contemporary graphic novels, making new use of Collodi's original myth in each instance. The structure and analysis of From Puppet to Cyborg resemble the picaresque journey of Pinocchio's adventures: with few sections longer than fifteen pages, the book's Introduction and Conclusion bookend three parts that are divided into prefatory pieces and nine short chapters. The Introduction is one of the longest sections, providing an overview of the contexts for Collodi's original and subsequent international translations, as well as twentieth-century stage and film adaptations. Here, Panteli makes a case for understanding Pinocchio's part in the fairy-tale tradition, following Vladimir Propp's Morphology of the Folk Tale (Russian original 1928), as well as Pinocchio's function as modern myth, fitting Joseph Campbell's formula from The Hero with a Thousand Faces (first edition 1949). Outlining the themes and archetypes of the Pinocchio myth—for example, fairy and talking animal characters; moments of confrontation and transformation; the hero's journey [End Page 595] of separation, initiation, and return—allows Panteli to engage these elements as connections for compar
回顾:从木偶到半机械人:皮诺曹的后人类之旅乔治亚·潘特利凯利·麦基森从木偶到半机械人:皮诺曹的后人类之旅。作者:Georgia Panteli。(《比较文学研究》,第40期)剑桥:Legenda, 2022。ISBN 978-1-781887-12-7。2023年,吉列尔莫·德尔·托罗(Guillermo Del Toro)改编的《木偶奇遇记》(Pinocchio)定格动画获得了奥斯卡最佳动画长片奖,观众们再次被这个140岁的淘气木偶的冒险故事所吸引。卡洛·科洛迪(Carlo Collodi)的经典作品于1881 - 1882年首次在一家意大利儿童杂志上连载,随后于1883年作为小说进行了扩充和出版,被广泛翻译和改编,至今仍是“世界上最著名的文本之一”(第1页)。这是乔治亚·潘特利(Georgia Panteli)的薄书《从木偶到电子人》(From Puppet to Cyborg)的第一句话。潘特利的比较项目追踪了当代对匹诺曹神话的重述,并分析了他们如何重新诠释和修改原著对人性的渴望。阅读Panteli的书的乐趣不是来自于一个集中持续的论点,而是来自于最近在三种媒体形式和多种语言的多种重新想象中挖掘出的匹诺曹元素所揭示的发人深省的见解。正如标题所暗示的那样,潘泰利的调查为匹诺曹神话,尤其是木男孩的欲望,作为后人类叙事的早期先驱,提供了一个合适的案例——在这里,读者应该期待与尼克·博斯特拉姆的《捍卫后人类尊严》(生物伦理学,19.3(2005),202-14)一致的后人类主义,它指的是人类范畴的超人类或超人的延伸。从科幻电影和电视中的机器人匹诺曹,到后现代元小说中的讽刺匹诺曹,再到当代图画小说中颠覆性的匹诺曹,潘泰利在每一个例子中都使用了科洛迪的原始神话。《从木偶到生化人》的结构和分析类似于匹诺曹的冒险之旅:只有很少的几个章节超过15页,书的引言和结论结束了三个部分,分为序言部分和九个简短的章节。引言是最长的部分之一,概述了科洛迪的原著和后来的国际翻译,以及20世纪的舞台剧和电影改编。在这里,潘泰利根据弗拉基米尔·普罗普的《民间故事的形态学》(1928年俄语原版),以及约瑟夫·坎贝尔在《千面英雄》(1949年第一版)中的公式,阐述了匹诺曹在童话传统中的角色,以及匹诺曹作为现代神话的功能。概述匹诺曹神话的主题和原型——例如,仙女和会说话的动物角色;对抗和转变的时刻;主人公的分离、成长和回归之旅——让潘泰利通过书中对当代复述的调查,将这些元素作为对比分析的联系。在第一部分中,Panteli声称匹诺曹的身份是“第一个有自己愿望成为人类的拟像”,这使他与早期的无生命转化(如Pygmalion的Galatea)区别开来,而是将他与科幻小说中的电子人联系起来(第26页)。雷德利·斯科特的《银翼杀手》(1982)中的瑞秋,史蒂芬·斯皮尔伯格的《人工智能》(2001)中的大卫,以及《太空堡垒卡拉狄加》(2004)中的莎伦都是“语义上的亲戚和主题上的同源”,他们协商自己与人类的关系(第30页)。在第二部分中,杰罗姆·查林的《匹诺曹的鼻子》(1983)和罗伯特·库弗的《威尼斯的匹诺曹》(1991)中的元虚构作家角色采用了匹诺曹神话的元素,然后反过来讽刺了人类的处境,尤其是通过关注衰老和死亡,这对所有木偶来说都是一个不太幸福的结局——变成了人。这些后现代小说的精神分析线索让潘特利重新审视了原始神话的特征,比如皮诺奇和蓝仙女之间的俄狄浦斯关系。在第三部分,Panteli读了两本图画小说,Ausonia的《匹诺曹》(2006)和Winshluss的《匹诺曹》(2008),看看它们是如何解构——也许更确切地说,是如何分解、逆转或拒绝——神话中关于人类成长的进步叙事,尤其是对消费主义价值观的批判。潘泰利没有……
{"title":"From Puppet to Cyborg: Pinocchio's Posthuman Journey by Georgia Panteli (review)","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/mlr.2023.a907846","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mlr.2023.a907846","url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: From Puppet to Cyborg: Pinocchio's Posthuman Journey by Georgia Panteli Kelly Mckisson From Puppet to Cyborg: Pinocchio's Posthuman Journey. By Georgia Panteli. (Studies in Comparative Literature, 40) Cambridge: Legenda. 2022. xi+ 178 pp. £85. ISBN 978–1–781887–12–7. When in 2023 Guillermo Del Toro's stop-motion adaptation of Pinocchio won the Oscar for best animated feature, audiences were again captivated by the adventures of the now one-hundred-and-forty-year-old mischievous puppet. Carlo Collodi's classic, first serialized in an Italian children's magazine in 1881–82, and then expanded and published as a novel in 1883, has been so widely translated and adapted that it remains 'one of the most famous texts in the world' (p. 1). So proclaims the first line of Georgia Panteli's slim book, From Puppet to Cyborg. Panteli's comparative project tracks contemporary retellings of the Pinocchio myth and analyses how they reinterpret and revise the original's concern with a desire to be human. The pleasure of reading Panteli's book comes not from one centrally sustained argument but instead from thought-provoking insights revealed by unearthing Pinocchio elements in multiple recent reimaginings, across three media forms and multiple languages. As the title suggests, Panteli's survey makes a suitable case for the Pinocchio myth, and especially the wooden boy's desires, as an early precursor to posthuman narratives—here, readers should expect the posthumanism aligned with Nick Bostrum's Tn Defense of Posthuman Dignity' (Bioethics, 19.3 (2005), 202–14), which refers to the transhuman or superhuman extension of the human category. Panteli moves from cyborg Pinocchios in science fiction film and television to ironic Pinocchios in postmodern metafiction and then to subversive Pinocchios in contemporary graphic novels, making new use of Collodi's original myth in each instance. The structure and analysis of From Puppet to Cyborg resemble the picaresque journey of Pinocchio's adventures: with few sections longer than fifteen pages, the book's Introduction and Conclusion bookend three parts that are divided into prefatory pieces and nine short chapters. The Introduction is one of the longest sections, providing an overview of the contexts for Collodi's original and subsequent international translations, as well as twentieth-century stage and film adaptations. Here, Panteli makes a case for understanding Pinocchio's part in the fairy-tale tradition, following Vladimir Propp's Morphology of the Folk Tale (Russian original 1928), as well as Pinocchio's function as modern myth, fitting Joseph Campbell's formula from The Hero with a Thousand Faces (first edition 1949). Outlining the themes and archetypes of the Pinocchio myth—for example, fairy and talking animal characters; moments of confrontation and transformation; the hero's journey [End Page 595] of separation, initiation, and return—allows Panteli to engage these elements as connections for compar","PeriodicalId":45399,"journal":{"name":"MODERN LANGUAGE REVIEW","volume":"153 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134935009","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Imagining the Soul in Premodern Literature by Abe Davies (review) 前现代文学中的灵魂想象亚伯·戴维斯(书评)
4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.1353/mlr.2023.a907854
Reviewed by: Imagining the Soul in Premodern Literature by Abe Davies David Parry Imagining the Soul in Premodern Literature. By Abe Davies. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 2021. xiv+ 244 pp. £109.99. ISBN 978–3–030–66332–2 (pbk 978–3–030–66335–3). Abe Davies's Imagining the Soul in Premodern Literature is an ambitiously wide- ranging and earnestly but often delightfully quirky study of the literary representation of the soul. The definition of 'soul' is a vexed question to which this study repeatedly returns, but Davies has a persuasive working definition: 'the soul is the privileged part of the human that transcends embodiment, and […] represents and guarantees the integrity of selfhood' (p. 5). He suggests that the persistence of this idea over time across varied human cultures is due to the fact that it 'represents] a self […] that is separable from the body and its death' (pp. 14–15). However, this core definition of the soul leaves and to some extent, Davies argues, generates numerous ambiguities. Much of Davies's study is dominated by the teasing out of these ambiguities as they manifest themselves in literary texts. Despite the title gesturing towards a broader premodernity, the texts analysed are primarily from the early modern period. Although his opening introductory chapter offers a broad survey of the history of the soul in classical, biblical, and medieval sources, the one medieval text Davies treats at length is the Old English Soul and Body from the Exeter Book, which Chapter 2 of the book pairs with Marvell's 'A Dialogue between the Soul and Body' as early and late examples of [End Page 608] the body/soul debate genre. Another provocative pairing is found in Chapter 3, which pairs Donne's Anniversary poems with Descartes's Discourse on Method as 'travelogues' of the soul, both using the subjective inner experience of the soul as a reassuring anchor to restore meaning to a cosmos threatened by the 'spatial turn', in which bodies with a fixed place in the order of things had been replaced by bodies with no fixed boundaries extending into an infinite space. Chapter 4 explores the address to the soul in didactic religious writing through the lens of a close reading of Shakespeare's Sonnet 146 ('Poor soul, the centre of my sinful earth'), structuring its discussion around the sonnet's images of the soul as military rebel, painted harlot, and prodigal son. Shakespeare is also the key focus of Chapter 5, which develops an innovative argument linking the 'nothingness' of the ghost of Old Hamlet to scientific debates around atomism in which the universe is made up mostly of void space. A brief concluding chapter notes how premodern debates around the body and soul relationship persist into present-day debates surrounding the nature of human consciousness. Davies highlights the early modern period as a transitional one in which classical and Christian notions of a soul that transcends materiality and mortality coexist with emerging challenges fr
评鉴:《前现代文学中的灵魂想象》作者:亚伯·戴维斯,大卫·帕里。亚伯·戴维斯著。Cham: Palgrave Macmillan出版社,2021。Xiv + 244页,109.99英镑。ISBN 978-3-030-66332-2 (pbk 978-3-030-66335-3)。亚伯·戴维斯的《前现代文学中的灵魂想象》是一部雄心勃勃、涉及面广、认真而又常常令人愉悦的对灵魂文学表现的古怪研究。“灵魂”的定义是一个令人困扰的问题,这个研究反复地回到这个问题上,但戴维斯有一个有说服力的工作定义:“灵魂是人类超越化身的特权部分,并且[…]代表并保证了自我的完整性”(第5页)。他认为,这个观点在不同的人类文化中持续存在,是因为它“代表了一个与身体及其死亡可分离的自我[…]”(第14-15页)。然而,戴维斯认为,灵魂的核心定义在某种程度上产生了许多歧义。戴维斯的大部分研究都是对这些在文学文本中表现出来的模糊性进行梳理。尽管标题指向更广泛的前现代性,但所分析的文本主要来自早期现代时期。尽管他的开篇介绍性章节提供了对古典、圣经和中世纪来源的灵魂历史的广泛调查,但戴维斯详细论述的中世纪文本是埃克塞特书中的古英语灵魂与身体,该书的第2章与马维尔的“灵魂与身体之间的对话”配对,作为身体/灵魂辩论类型的早期和晚期例子。在第三章中发现了另一种挑衅的配对,将多恩的周年纪念诗歌与笛卡尔的方法话语作为灵魂的“旅行”,两者都使用灵魂的主观内心体验作为可靠的锚,以恢复受“空间转向”威胁的宇宙的意义,在这种情况下,在事物顺序中具有固定位置的身体被没有固定边界的身体所取代,延伸到无限的空间。第四章通过仔细阅读莎士比亚十四行诗146(“可怜的灵魂,我罪恶的地球的中心”),探讨了在说教的宗教写作中对灵魂的描述,围绕十四行诗中灵魂的形象,如军事反叛、画中的妓女和浪子,进行了讨论。莎士比亚也是第五章的重点,这一章提出了一个创新的论点,将老哈姆雷特鬼魂的“虚无”与围绕原子论的科学辩论联系起来,原子论认为宇宙主要由虚无空间组成。一个简短的结论章指出了前现代关于身体和灵魂关系的争论如何持续到今天关于人类意识本质的争论。戴维斯强调,近代早期是一个过渡时期,古典和基督教的灵魂观念超越了物质性和必死性,与唯物主义哲学和生理学的新挑战并存。然而,他对时间顺序上的整齐分期提出了质疑。一方面,“事实证明,如果不把早期现代灵魂拉回到它所产生的古代和中世纪传统中,就不可能想到它”(第17页)。另一方面,引用凯瑟琳·斯蒂尔·布罗考(Katherine Steele Brokaw)和杰伊·齐斯克(Jay Zysk)的话说,“前现代性”本身与“理性的、复杂的和世俗化的”力量“与唯物主义现代性相关”(第19页)相距甚远。虽然这本书中没有引用它,但我想起了布鲁诺·拉图尔的《我们从未是现代的》(1991;反式。凯瑟琳·波特(哈佛:哈佛大学出版社,1993)。戴维斯似乎是在暗示,我们一直都是现代的,尽管关于身体和灵魂的长期争论,周期化崩溃的最终结果可以说是一样的。这本书充满了创造性的联系和挑衅的新观点,其中一些戴维斯承认“更多的是推测而不是结论”(第214页)。戴维斯最具说服力的是,他展示了他所讨论的文本是如何努力将身体与灵魂分开的,所谓的非物质灵魂总是用物质的术语来描述(比如约瑟夫·霍尔对“你被描绘的灵魂”的指责)。
{"title":"Imagining the Soul in Premodern Literature by Abe Davies (review)","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/mlr.2023.a907854","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mlr.2023.a907854","url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Imagining the Soul in Premodern Literature by Abe Davies David Parry Imagining the Soul in Premodern Literature. By Abe Davies. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 2021. xiv+ 244 pp. £109.99. ISBN 978–3–030–66332–2 (pbk 978–3–030–66335–3). Abe Davies's Imagining the Soul in Premodern Literature is an ambitiously wide- ranging and earnestly but often delightfully quirky study of the literary representation of the soul. The definition of 'soul' is a vexed question to which this study repeatedly returns, but Davies has a persuasive working definition: 'the soul is the privileged part of the human that transcends embodiment, and […] represents and guarantees the integrity of selfhood' (p. 5). He suggests that the persistence of this idea over time across varied human cultures is due to the fact that it 'represents] a self […] that is separable from the body and its death' (pp. 14–15). However, this core definition of the soul leaves and to some extent, Davies argues, generates numerous ambiguities. Much of Davies's study is dominated by the teasing out of these ambiguities as they manifest themselves in literary texts. Despite the title gesturing towards a broader premodernity, the texts analysed are primarily from the early modern period. Although his opening introductory chapter offers a broad survey of the history of the soul in classical, biblical, and medieval sources, the one medieval text Davies treats at length is the Old English Soul and Body from the Exeter Book, which Chapter 2 of the book pairs with Marvell's 'A Dialogue between the Soul and Body' as early and late examples of [End Page 608] the body/soul debate genre. Another provocative pairing is found in Chapter 3, which pairs Donne's Anniversary poems with Descartes's Discourse on Method as 'travelogues' of the soul, both using the subjective inner experience of the soul as a reassuring anchor to restore meaning to a cosmos threatened by the 'spatial turn', in which bodies with a fixed place in the order of things had been replaced by bodies with no fixed boundaries extending into an infinite space. Chapter 4 explores the address to the soul in didactic religious writing through the lens of a close reading of Shakespeare's Sonnet 146 ('Poor soul, the centre of my sinful earth'), structuring its discussion around the sonnet's images of the soul as military rebel, painted harlot, and prodigal son. Shakespeare is also the key focus of Chapter 5, which develops an innovative argument linking the 'nothingness' of the ghost of Old Hamlet to scientific debates around atomism in which the universe is made up mostly of void space. A brief concluding chapter notes how premodern debates around the body and soul relationship persist into present-day debates surrounding the nature of human consciousness. Davies highlights the early modern period as a transitional one in which classical and Christian notions of a soul that transcends materiality and mortality coexist with emerging challenges fr","PeriodicalId":45399,"journal":{"name":"MODERN LANGUAGE REVIEW","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134935244","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Zola's Painters by Robert Lethbridge (review) 左拉的画家罗伯特·莱斯布里奇(评论)
4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.1353/mlr.2023.a907864
Reviewed by: Zola's Painters by Robert Lethbridge Claire Moran Zola's Painters. By Robert Lethbridge. (Research Monographs in French Studies, 68) Cambridge: Legenda. 2022. xiii+ 230 pp. £85. ISBN 978–1–83954–079–0. 'It is difficult to dispute the oft-made claim', as Robert Lethbridge writes in his engaging and meticulously researched monograph on Émile Zola, 'that with the possible exception of Baudelaire, no other nineteenth-century writer enjoyed such a close relationship with the art of his time' (p. 24). What Lethbridge reveals, however, over the course of six chapters on Zola's art criticism, discussions on Cézanne, Courbet, Manet, landscape painters, and, interestingly, the Old Masters, is the complexity of, as well as the many paradoxes and contradictions that define, that relationship. The book could easily have borne a subtitle borrowed from one of the chapter subheadings such as 'tensions and contradictions' or 'reflections and refractions', since what Lethbridge unearths is the complicated history of nineteenth-century art and the figures which shaped it. Zola is important not only as a critic but also as a chroniqueur, although these roles were largely self-defined. In his articles for the annual Salons, he details facts and figures that remain historically significant. In 1876, for example, he notes 104,775 visitors in the opening week of the Salon, with 50,000 visitors on the final day, a Sunday, when there was no entry fee (p. 12). But it is Zola's role as critic that Lethbridge scrutinizes. Through careful reading of Zola's correspondence from the 1860s to the 1890s, Lethbridge questions Zola's artistic 'apprenticeship' and the relationships and personal and professional motives that moulded it. The writer's self-belief is never in doubt as from the outset, in 1859, shortly after moving from Aix-en-Provence to Paris, he distinguishes himself from 'des personnes qui se piquent de se connaître en peinture et [qu'il voit] au Salon prendre des ânes pour des vaches' (p. 16). Zola's immense contribution to nineteenth-century criticism is well known (between 1863 and 1869 alone he penned almost four dozen reviews on aesthetics, scholarly books by art historians, and illustrated editions), yet it is his writing on Impressionism, most particularly directly and indirectly on Manet, as well as what has been largely understood as a veiled portrait of Cézanne in L'Œuvre, that has gained most critical attention. What Lethbridge's book does in a subtle yet convincing way is to question the relationships that underscore these texts, both critical and fictional. The figure of Claude Lantier looms large, and the mutually admiring yet thorny relationship of Zola and Cézanne could, as the author notes in his Introduction, merit an entire book. In this chapter, which stands out for its sensitive portrayal of a friendship that unravels, not, as art-historical and literary legend would have it, because of Zola's damning and wounding fictional portrait o
书评:左拉的画家罗伯特·莱斯布里奇克莱尔·莫兰左拉的画家。罗伯特·莱斯布里奇著。(法国研究研究专著,68)剑桥:Legenda. 2022。13 + 230页,85英镑。ISBN 978-1-83954-079-0。正如罗伯特·莱斯布里奇(Robert Lethbridge)在他对Émile左拉进行了引人入胜的细致研究的专著中所写的那样,“很难反驳人们经常提出的说法,即除了波德莱尔之外,没有其他19世纪的作家与他那个时代的艺术有着如此密切的关系”(第24页)。然而,莱斯布里奇在关于左拉艺术批评的六章中所揭示的是,关于cmaczanne,库尔贝,马奈,风景画家,以及有趣的,早期大师的讨论,是这种关系的复杂性,以及定义的许多悖论和矛盾。这本书可以很容易地从其中一个章节的副标题中借用一个副标题,比如“紧张与矛盾”或“反思与折射”,因为莱斯布里奇揭示的是19世纪艺术的复杂历史和塑造它的人物。左拉不仅是一个重要的评论家,也是一个重要的记录者,尽管这些角色在很大程度上是自我定义的。在他为《沙龙》杂志撰写的年度文章中,他详述了具有历史意义的事实和数据。以1876年为例,他注意到沙龙开幕的第一周有104,775名参观者,最后一天(周日)有50,000名参观者,当时没有入场费(第12页)。但莱斯布里奇仔细审视的是左拉作为批评家的角色。通过仔细阅读左拉从19世纪60年代到19世纪90年代的信件,莱斯布里奇质疑左拉的艺术“学徒”,以及塑造它的人际关系、个人和职业动机。从1859年从普罗旺斯的艾克斯搬到巴黎后不久,这位作家的自信就毋庸置疑,因为从一开始,他就把自己与“des personnes qui se piquent de se connatreen peinture et [qu'il voit] au Salon prendre des nes pour des vaches”(第16页)区分开来。左拉对19世纪批评的巨大贡献是众所周知的(仅在1863年至1869年间,他就撰写了近40篇关于美学的评论,艺术史学家的学术书籍和插图版本),然而,他对印象派的写作,尤其是直接或间接地对马奈的写作,以及在L'Œuvre中被广泛理解为对c赞纳的面纱肖像的写作,获得了最重要的关注。莱斯布里奇的书以一种微妙而令人信服的方式质疑了这些文本之间的关系,无论是批判性的还是虚构的。克劳德·兰蒂埃的形象凸显出来,而左拉和卡姆萨纳相互欣赏却又棘手的关系,正如作者在前言中所指出的那样,值得用一整本书来描述。在这一章中,它以其对友谊的敏感描绘而脱颖而出,而不是像艺术历史和文学传说所描述的那样,因为左拉对一个绝望的艺术家的诅咒和伤害的虚构肖像,但更多的是因为政治和意识形态的差异(最明显的是围绕德雷福斯事件),宗教观点和个人怨恨。正如莱斯布里奇所说,他们之间的隔阂有“多重线索”(第59页)。事实上,正是这种对左拉的批评与他自己的人际关系和自我投射交织在一起的强调,使得《左拉的画家》的每一章都是如此引人入胜的读物。莱斯布里奇对马奈的左拉画像(1868)的讨论值得特别提及,因为它仔细地描绘了另一套复杂的重叠和无法回答的问题[…],这些问题存在于纪实报告文学和想象戏剧之间。在许多方面,左拉的《画家》提供了一个很好的例子,说明为什么19世纪的学术研究如此重要:神话和半真半假的事实,以及政治、社会和个人的复杂性,塑造了这一时期的艺术和文学,以及它们的接受,需要得到充分的拷问,即使我们留下的问题比令人满意的答案更有趣。贝尔法斯特女王大学版权所有©2023现代人文研究协会
{"title":"Zola's Painters by Robert Lethbridge (review)","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/mlr.2023.a907864","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mlr.2023.a907864","url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Zola's Painters by Robert Lethbridge Claire Moran Zola's Painters. By Robert Lethbridge. (Research Monographs in French Studies, 68) Cambridge: Legenda. 2022. xiii+ 230 pp. £85. ISBN 978–1–83954–079–0. 'It is difficult to dispute the oft-made claim', as Robert Lethbridge writes in his engaging and meticulously researched monograph on Émile Zola, 'that with the possible exception of Baudelaire, no other nineteenth-century writer enjoyed such a close relationship with the art of his time' (p. 24). What Lethbridge reveals, however, over the course of six chapters on Zola's art criticism, discussions on Cézanne, Courbet, Manet, landscape painters, and, interestingly, the Old Masters, is the complexity of, as well as the many paradoxes and contradictions that define, that relationship. The book could easily have borne a subtitle borrowed from one of the chapter subheadings such as 'tensions and contradictions' or 'reflections and refractions', since what Lethbridge unearths is the complicated history of nineteenth-century art and the figures which shaped it. Zola is important not only as a critic but also as a chroniqueur, although these roles were largely self-defined. In his articles for the annual Salons, he details facts and figures that remain historically significant. In 1876, for example, he notes 104,775 visitors in the opening week of the Salon, with 50,000 visitors on the final day, a Sunday, when there was no entry fee (p. 12). But it is Zola's role as critic that Lethbridge scrutinizes. Through careful reading of Zola's correspondence from the 1860s to the 1890s, Lethbridge questions Zola's artistic 'apprenticeship' and the relationships and personal and professional motives that moulded it. The writer's self-belief is never in doubt as from the outset, in 1859, shortly after moving from Aix-en-Provence to Paris, he distinguishes himself from 'des personnes qui se piquent de se connaître en peinture et [qu'il voit] au Salon prendre des ânes pour des vaches' (p. 16). Zola's immense contribution to nineteenth-century criticism is well known (between 1863 and 1869 alone he penned almost four dozen reviews on aesthetics, scholarly books by art historians, and illustrated editions), yet it is his writing on Impressionism, most particularly directly and indirectly on Manet, as well as what has been largely understood as a veiled portrait of Cézanne in L'Œuvre, that has gained most critical attention. What Lethbridge's book does in a subtle yet convincing way is to question the relationships that underscore these texts, both critical and fictional. The figure of Claude Lantier looms large, and the mutually admiring yet thorny relationship of Zola and Cézanne could, as the author notes in his Introduction, merit an entire book. In this chapter, which stands out for its sensitive portrayal of a friendship that unravels, not, as art-historical and literary legend would have it, because of Zola's damning and wounding fictional portrait o","PeriodicalId":45399,"journal":{"name":"MODERN LANGUAGE REVIEW","volume":"143 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134935265","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Climate and the Making of Worlds: Toward a Geohistorical Poetics by Tobias Menely (review) 气候与世界的形成:走向地理历史诗学托比亚斯·梅内利(书评)
4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.1353/mlr.2023.a907855
Reviewed by: Climate and the Making of Worlds: Toward a Geohistorical Poetics by Tobias Menely Sophie Fordham Climate and the Making of Worlds: Toward a Geohistorical Poetics. By Tobias Menely. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 2021. vii+ 269 pp. $27.50. ISBN 978–0–226–77628–6. Energized by Fredric Jameson's coinage in The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act (London: Methuen, 1981), Tobias Menely's Climate and the Making of Worlds astutely locates the misty gradations of the 'climatological unconscious' in a sample of poems scattered across 140 years of fluctuating atmospheric conditions. Starting with John Milton's Paradise Lost (1667) and closing with Charlotte Smith's Beachy Head (1807), this interdisciplinary and multidimensional critical text yearns to make visible the covert ways in which climate has shaped poetics, by tracing the vicissitudes of both and evidencing why the connection between them is not incidental but generative. It traces the development of poetic mode—from the allegorical, to the descriptive, to the lyrical—across a century-and-a-half of intense energy transition, where meaningful reliance upon a system of solar energy conditioned by the flux of sunlight, wind, and water is phased out by an emerging planetary system and mode of production fuelled by fossil energy. This intertwined poetic and planetary genealogy is sketched out in great detail, through meticulous interdisciplinary research over a decade in the making—and yet the text remains relevant, rehearsing a renewed critical approach to unconsciously climatological poetry that has the potential to transform and better connect the nexus of fields it contributes to. The first chapter leans on an understanding of Paradise Lost as allegory, in order to perform a geohistorical reading of its 'mimetic strata' (p. 48). A significant portion of the chapter is devoted to justifying the allegorical nature of Milton's epic, both responding to and pre-empting further critical resistance to characterizing the poem in a way that is often understood to insufficiently capture the sensitivities to mimetic relation and representation Milton was so consciously attuned to. Menely gets around this somewhat by framing allegory as an unstable and multivalent term in itself, the 'name' for Paradise Lost's 'refusal to offer the reader an interpretive code' (p. 47). The second chapter examines James Thomson's The Seasons (1730), a text which uses description to witness the workings of a natural world circumscribed by seasonal and diurnal patterns, rather than to express a sentimental attachment or [End Page 610] psychological relation to it. The third chapter looks at four industrial georgics which evidence the crisis of description that arose in the late 1700s, as new modes of industrial production—whether in mines, factories, or plantations—were in the process of decoupling from the temporal and geographic realities of an economy controlled by solar energy. The
《气候与世界的形成:走向地理历史诗学》作者:托拜厄斯·梅内利,索菲·福特汉姆托拜厄斯·梅内利著。芝加哥:芝加哥大学出版社,2021。Vii + 269页,27.50美元。ISBN 978-0-226-77628-6。受弗雷德里克·詹姆逊在《政治无意识:作为一种社会象征行为的叙事》(伦敦:梅辛出版社,1981)的启发,托拜厄斯·梅内利的《气候与世界的形成》敏锐地将“气候无意识”的模糊层次定位在140年来大气条件波动的诗歌样本中。从约翰·弥尔顿的《失乐园》(1667)开始,到夏洛特·史密斯的《比奇角》(1807)结束,这本跨学科的、多维度的批判性文本渴望通过追踪两者的变迁,并证明它们之间的联系不是偶然的,而是产生的,来揭示气候塑造诗学的隐秘方式。它追溯了诗歌模式的发展——从寓言,到描写,再到抒情——跨越了一个半世纪的激烈能源转型,在那里,对太阳能系统的有意义的依赖受到阳光、风和水的影响,逐渐被新兴的行星系统和化石能源驱动的生产模式所淘汰。通过十多年来细致的跨学科研究,作者非常详细地勾勒出了这种交织在一起的诗歌和行星谱系——然而,文本仍然具有相关性,对无意识的气候诗歌进行了一种新的批判方法,这种方法有可能改变并更好地连接它所贡献的领域的联系。第一章将《失乐园》理解为寓言,以便对其“拟态地层”进行地理历史解读(第48页)。这一章很重要的一部分是用来为弥尔顿史诗的寓言本质辩护的,既回应了,也先发制人地阻止了进一步的批评,反对以一种通常被理解为不足以捕捉到弥尔顿有意识地适应的,对模仿关系和表现的敏感性的方式来描述这首诗。Menely通过将寓言本身定义为一个不稳定的和多重价值的术语来解决这个问题,这是《失乐园》“拒绝为读者提供解释性代码”的“名字”(第47页)。第二章考察了詹姆斯·汤姆森的《季节》(1730),这篇文章通过描述来见证一个受季节和昼夜模式限制的自然世界的运作,而不是表达一种情感依恋或与之的心理关系。第三章考察了四种工业地质,它们证明了18世纪末出现的描述危机,因为新的工业生产模式——无论是在矿山、工厂还是种植园——正在与太阳能控制的经济的时间和地理现实脱钩。最后一章也是最有说服力的一章考察了诗歌形式的抒情化,部分地展示了自然世界是如何成为心理和精神解脱的源泉的,正是因为它与劳动和生产空间的分离。所选原始材料的地层密度在梅内利自己的作品中得到了复制,这使得这本书的内容紧凑,本身就与其他理论和地学读物紧密交织在一起——远远超过了本书所能解释的。最丰富的时刻出现了,当文本的多维论点在每一个连续的阅读中被重新表述,当那些被仔细阅读的具体证据层被去物质化,这样推动项目“走向”地理历史诗学的运动和精神可能会被更充分地照亮。梅内利成功地说明了诗歌并不是安放在琥珀里的,他认为,连续读者的气候条件变化将显著影响他们与这些过去的诗歌项目互动的方式。这里的含义是,当(或者如果)我们的地球系统从目前对化石能源的依赖中进化出来时,目前难以想象的阅读方式和写作方式将会出现。伦敦玛丽女王大学版权所有©2023现代人文研究协会
{"title":"Climate and the Making of Worlds: Toward a Geohistorical Poetics by Tobias Menely (review)","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/mlr.2023.a907855","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mlr.2023.a907855","url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Climate and the Making of Worlds: Toward a Geohistorical Poetics by Tobias Menely Sophie Fordham Climate and the Making of Worlds: Toward a Geohistorical Poetics. By Tobias Menely. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 2021. vii+ 269 pp. $27.50. ISBN 978–0–226–77628–6. Energized by Fredric Jameson's coinage in The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act (London: Methuen, 1981), Tobias Menely's Climate and the Making of Worlds astutely locates the misty gradations of the 'climatological unconscious' in a sample of poems scattered across 140 years of fluctuating atmospheric conditions. Starting with John Milton's Paradise Lost (1667) and closing with Charlotte Smith's Beachy Head (1807), this interdisciplinary and multidimensional critical text yearns to make visible the covert ways in which climate has shaped poetics, by tracing the vicissitudes of both and evidencing why the connection between them is not incidental but generative. It traces the development of poetic mode—from the allegorical, to the descriptive, to the lyrical—across a century-and-a-half of intense energy transition, where meaningful reliance upon a system of solar energy conditioned by the flux of sunlight, wind, and water is phased out by an emerging planetary system and mode of production fuelled by fossil energy. This intertwined poetic and planetary genealogy is sketched out in great detail, through meticulous interdisciplinary research over a decade in the making—and yet the text remains relevant, rehearsing a renewed critical approach to unconsciously climatological poetry that has the potential to transform and better connect the nexus of fields it contributes to. The first chapter leans on an understanding of Paradise Lost as allegory, in order to perform a geohistorical reading of its 'mimetic strata' (p. 48). A significant portion of the chapter is devoted to justifying the allegorical nature of Milton's epic, both responding to and pre-empting further critical resistance to characterizing the poem in a way that is often understood to insufficiently capture the sensitivities to mimetic relation and representation Milton was so consciously attuned to. Menely gets around this somewhat by framing allegory as an unstable and multivalent term in itself, the 'name' for Paradise Lost's 'refusal to offer the reader an interpretive code' (p. 47). The second chapter examines James Thomson's The Seasons (1730), a text which uses description to witness the workings of a natural world circumscribed by seasonal and diurnal patterns, rather than to express a sentimental attachment or [End Page 610] psychological relation to it. The third chapter looks at four industrial georgics which evidence the crisis of description that arose in the late 1700s, as new modes of industrial production—whether in mines, factories, or plantations—were in the process of decoupling from the temporal and geographic realities of an economy controlled by solar energy. The ","PeriodicalId":45399,"journal":{"name":"MODERN LANGUAGE REVIEW","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134933778","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Destiny, Discretion, and the Demonic: On Isak Dinesen's 'Alkmene' 命运、自由裁量权和恶魔:论伊萨克·迪内森的《阿尔克门尼》
4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.1353/mlr.2023.a907831
Peter Yoonsuk Paik
Abstract: What kind of role does fate play in a world that denies its existence? This article explores this question in relation to 'Alkmene', a tale by Isak Dinesen (Karen Blixen), which depicts the relationship between a young nobleman and the title character, an orphan who resists the Christian faith of her adoptive parents. The article examines the mysterious events that conspire to thwart the budding romance between the two. The denial of destiny draws the nobleman into the grip of a demonic silence.
摘要:在一个否定命运存在的世界里,命运扮演着怎样的角色?本文通过伊萨克·迪内森(凯伦·布利克森饰)的小说《阿尔克曼》探讨了这个问题,故事描述了一个年轻的贵族和主人公之间的关系,主人公是一个反抗养父母基督教信仰的孤儿。这篇文章探讨了阴谋阻止两人之间萌芽的浪漫的神秘事件。对命运的否认使贵族陷入了恶魔般的沉默。
{"title":"Destiny, Discretion, and the Demonic: On Isak Dinesen's 'Alkmene'","authors":"Peter Yoonsuk Paik","doi":"10.1353/mlr.2023.a907831","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mlr.2023.a907831","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: What kind of role does fate play in a world that denies its existence? This article explores this question in relation to 'Alkmene', a tale by Isak Dinesen (Karen Blixen), which depicts the relationship between a young nobleman and the title character, an orphan who resists the Christian faith of her adoptive parents. The article examines the mysterious events that conspire to thwart the budding romance between the two. The denial of destiny draws the nobleman into the grip of a demonic silence.","PeriodicalId":45399,"journal":{"name":"MODERN LANGUAGE REVIEW","volume":"2014 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134933788","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
MODERN LANGUAGE REVIEW
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1